TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DarrenPlymouth

Saved - February 9, 2026 at 6:08 PM

@DarrenPlymouth - Darren of Plymouth

The Committee of 300 by Dr John Coleman The plan to halve the world population by 2050. A must listen. Link to the book is in the thread. Please repost. https://t.co/WiGDLx7u9t

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents a message of alarm and action, arguing that anarchy in Washington DC stems from the federal government seizing powers and passing unconstitutional laws, with men acting as though they are above the Constitution. He claims a supranational, clandestine power structure governs world events. Key claim: a Committee of Three Hundred (also known in intelligence circles as the Olympians) consists of 300 men who run the world and who are sworn to secrecy. The speaker says he discovered this while in Africa, finding documents labeled above top-secret that revealed the committee’s influence. He asserts that the descendants of the British East India Company control The United States today, and that the 300 men govern global affairs with equal voting rights and no outvoting. The speaker traces the committee’s roots and influence to the British East India Company, opium profits, and a global elite. He asserts that in India House in London he found manifests showing opium trade profits that dwarned major carmakers’ profits for certain years, and that the 300 govern from Venice’s black nobility families (the Lucatis, the Rekanates, the Volpe Dumiserratis), boasting wealth that would make figures like David Rockefeller seem modest. He claims those families still run the world and name every member in his book The Committee of 300 and, later, in socialism, the road to slavery. The scope of control is described as worldwide and multi-branch: the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA, aka Chatham House) is the executive arm; the Club of Rome, the Seni Foundation, the Mont Pelerin Society, the Order of Saint John are tapped as executive arms; the RIIA allegedly instructs U.S. policy through the Morgan Guarantee & Trust Bank, with Dennis Weatherstone as a conduit to the Secretary of State and then the President. The speaker alleges the Gulf War was orchestrated by Margaret Thatcher (in Aspen Institute) to instruct George Bush, framing it as unconstitutional and driven by an international agenda. He asserts that the Club of Rome (through Aurelio Peccei) sought to destroy U.S. industry and agriculture, citing Bertrand Russell’s influence and writings on overpopulation. He claims the Club of Rome’s “Zero Growth” post-industrial plan aimed to destroy the American middle class, destroy U.S. industries, and push a socialist transformation. Global 2000 is described as a Club of Rome genocide blueprint targeting mass population reduction by 2050, aimed particularly at decimating the U.S. middle class and other populations. The speaker links AIDS, HIV-era and other outbreaks to this plan, alleging deliberate creation and dissemination of pathogens via Fort Detrick, the World Health Organization, and other bodies, with assertions of experiments (CAB, Lassa fever, etc.) and a later shift to other viruses like HIV/AIDS, cholera, malaria, and black plague, all framed as part of population control under the global plan. He claims vaccines and viral campaigns in Africa and Brazil were weaponized to decimate populations, while the “black nobility” finances these operations through London and Venice. The speaker asserts that a vast network of bankers, insurance companies, mining conglomerates, and political organizations—including the Democrat Party in the U.S.—are controlled by the 300 and their secret society apparatus ( Illuminati, Society of the Cincinnati, etc.). He contends the strongest arm is the Club of Rome, and that the RIA/Club of Rome manipulated U.S. presidents through PMs, MI6, and other foreign controllers. He gives examples: Lincoln’s assassination, Wilson’s presidency, Kennedy’s murder, and later U.S. policy under Bush, Clinton, and others, as outcomes of control by London and the RIIA. The speaker contends that intelligence and political leadership are predetermined by the 300, not elected by the people. He argues the President and Secretary of State are chosen by the Royal Institute for International Affairs, not directly by the American electorate. He cites MacArthur, Dean Rusk, and Truman as exemplars of subversion by an international power structure that guides U.S. foreign policy. In closing, the speaker asserts the Constitution is immutable, condemns what he sees as creeping socialism, and calls for the dissolution of the Federal Reserve and a severing of the concord between the 50 states and the federal government. He frames the situation as a war to the death for the United States, urging Americans to reclaim state sovereignty and reject what he characterizes as unconstitutional measures, arguing that the United States consists of 50 nations with rights to dissolve the federal government if necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ladies and gentlemen, I bring you a message of hope, not fear. A message that I hope will galvanize us all into much needed action. The problem is quite simple. Anarchy and chaos prevails in Washington DC because the federal government has seized powers to which it is not entitled to and is passing masses of laws that are 100% unconstitutional. And when you get men setting themselves up as greater than the constitution of The United States, you get anarchy and eventually tyranny. It's taken me twenty five years to come to the conclusion that I have come to, and I want to tell you that one of the biggest things I discovered in my work was the existence of a supranational committee composed of 300 men. I came across this quite by accident when I was serving in Africa in Angola, and I was given a series of documents which were only supposed to be handed in to top level people. They were what we call above the top level of classification of intelligence documents. And there I discovered that whilst I thought I was in Africa fighting against the invasion of the communists, I was, in fact, fighting to introduce socialist regimes in the black African countries, and that I was actually working for a committee called the Committee of Three Hundred, also known in intelligence circles as the Olympians. In my book, the Committee of Three Hundred, which took twenty years of research, and incidentally, I was only a little bit behind with Karl Marx. He spent thirty years in the British Museum in London where he got most of his things from. I point out that the British East India Company was the most powerful trading company in the world. They made their massive monies out of the dope trade. They first grew prime poppies in Kew Gardens in Kensington, London, got the best producing opium poppies. They then shipped them to binaries in India where they began a massive plantation of poppies, opium producing poppies. They then used their famous tea clippers to transport the poppies in the form of raw opium to China. And by their military force, they imposed an opium policy on China that turned the Chinese nation into a nation of addicts. And they enforced this policy, which was known to the royal family and lord Gladstone, the prime minister, and every one of the lords and ladies in England. And they made a massive huge fortune In researching these documents in India House in London, I came across some of the manifests of the old tea clippers and the numbers of kegs of opium they carried in the values. And I totaled up to these things, and I found to my astonishment that if we took 1970 as an optimum year for profits in General Motors and Ford, in one year, the opium trade with China was three times the profits of the combined profits of Ford and General Motors in 1917. And this was shared by 300 people. That was the committee that ran the British East India Company. They all had equal voting rights. They could not outvote each other, and, of course, they were sworn to secrecy. The descendants of the British East India Company today run The United States. These 300 men in the committee of 300 still run the world today with an iron fist. Their wealth is untold, cannot be measured. I know I looked at some of the the records that I could find in Italy, in Rome. I've done most of my work on location, and this has always been invaluable to me. And I came across the families in Italy who were called the funding, meaning the people who had all the money. They were all members of the Committee of three hundred, the Lucatis, the Rekinates, the Volpe Dumiserratis. These people are so wealthy that they would make David Rockefeller look like a piker. That is how rich they are, and this is the committee that runs the world. Now in my book, the committee of three hundred, I name every one of them. This is not a book that talks about they. It gives you specifics. And I must say I do the same thing in my new book, socialism, the road to slavery, which was ten years in researching. On 07/04/1789, George Washington told the congress, it is necessary for us to impose tariffs to protect the manufacturers of our colonies. That was the first trade barrier. Now let us dispose for once and for all with the words that have been implanted on our minds like isolationist and you are for restricted trade and you are against global trade, The United States Of America did not grow great on global trade. The United States Of America grew great on the hard labor of the people who lived in those days and the wise protection barriers put up by president George Washington. Because immediately after the war, they tried the British to try to down The United States through so called free trade, which is nothing but piracy. Free trade, ladies and gentlemen, is a one way street which allows other countries to dump their products on our markets to the detriment of our own people. That's what free trade is. It's strictly a one way street. The trade barriers were increased by Lincoln, Garfield, and McKinley, and all three presidents paid with their lives for that policy. Disraeli was particularly incensed with Lincoln. Disraeli was the British prime minister at the time. And he ordered British I MI six to assassinate Lincoln, which is what they did. The same way as British MI six publicly executed president John F. Kennedy at a later time. Our founding fathers and our presidents saw the value of trade barriers. They realized that we, if we wanted to progress, were not to be the dumping ground of the world. And I'm going to leave that subject for now and return to it later. The format that I want to use this morning is the type of questions that are most often asked of me. I've spoken to hundreds of thousands of people across The United States and worldwide, And I've been on many, many radio shows. And these type of questions, we note them, and this is what comes up most of all. Who and what is the Committee of three hundred? Well, I've dealt with that. I've told you this is a supranational body that knows no boundaries, respects the laws of no countries. The first time that they were publicly announced was by a German socialist by the name of Walter Raffinau. Now I'll give you some background of Walter Rathenau. He was the financial adviser to the Kaiser of Germany, and he was also the financial adviser to the Rothschilds, the French family Rothschilds. So he must have known what he's talking about. He made an astonishing statement in 1934. He said there is a committee of 300 men that rule the world. They are known only to each other, and nothing happens without their consent. When former head of state Mikhail visited The United States a few years ago, flanked by George Bush and quail, he opened his foundation in The United States. And he left slip. He said, this is being done with approval of the Committee of three hundred. CNN cameras were on him. They immediately switched. Now I wrote to CNN, and I said, could I have a transcript of this program, which they said was available, I never got a reply. I followed it up with letter after letter, but nothing ever came of it. The point I'm trying to make, ladies and gentlemen, is that the federal government, the secret upper level parallel government that runs The United States, does not want you to know that you have an upper level parallel government that calls the shots, that dictates what is going to happen to your life and mine. So that's how I found out about the Committee of the three hundred. The next question is what are their goals? Their goals are a one world government, latterly called the New World Order. The one world government began with King George the third. At the time that the colonists were brave enough to take him on, King George was already busy formulating a one world government, and he had lined up at least 50 countries that were willing to come into this future world dictatorship with him. The goals then, very simply stated, are to make the world over into a one world, new world order dictatorship controlled utterly and completely by this committee of 300. How can they possibly carry out their goals? That's the next question that I'm often asked. They do it by dint and by virtue of their fantastic wealth and the fact that they control thousands of the top banking institutions, the political organizations, insurance companies. In fact, one of the giant insurance companies, a man called me and said, do you mean to tell me that they are controlling the metropolitan of New York? I said, the metropolitan of New York is Peanuts. He said, how can you say that? That's a giant American company. I said, well, compared with the Securrenzi de Generali de Venezia, it's Peanuts. That's the biggest insurance company in the world. They control that organization. Everything that happens in the world in the insurance field comes out of Venice. That's why Venice is so important because in Venice, we have the black nobility. Now that has nothing to do with the color of the skin of the people, and I'm going to come back to them as we go along. So the goals are a one world dictatorship of the most brutal kind. And how they carry it out is they have these interface banks, insurance companies, mining conglomerates, every conceivable control in politics, including the Democrat Party the United States, which is, of course, since 1980 behind closed doors at a secret caucus in Washington DC, the Democrat hierarchy took on the goals of the old Socialist Party USA, I. E, based upon the communist manifesto of 1848. If you have a copy of my book, and I'm not pushing it, but in my book, The Committee of 300, I list every one of their huge, gigantic corporations, how they interface. And this, ladies and gentlemen, is an eye opener because it gets right down to the nitty gritty of your everyday life in the cities and towns across The United States. So they carry out their goals through existing organizations. And also, of course, they have built up some special organizations of their own. When I first started writing in America when I came here in 1969, I revealed the existence of an organization called the Royal Institute for International Affairs, which is located at Chatham House in 10 Saint James Square in London. I also revealed the existence of the Club of Rome, the Seni Foundation, the Monteloran Society, the Order of Saint John, which was known but not known. And I listed all of these secret societies that run the world as executive arms of the Committee of three hundred. So it controls the world through all of these. The Royal Institute for International Affairs is the executive arm of this committee which gives instructions to the United States government to this very day. The chain of command is as follows. Every secretary of state that has been appointed since 1919 is appointed by the Royal Institute for International Affairs. That may come as a shock for you. You think you vote and you put a conservative in the White House, And then he appoints supposedly or allegedly conservative people to carry out the policies that you wanted him to implement. Surprise. Surprise. I ask you to find me a conservative secretary of state since 1919. And if you search diligently and apply the correct rules, you will come up blank. Every one of the secretaries of state was chosen in London by the secretary of state, as was Wilson, the president Wilson, as was Roosevelt, as was James Earl Carter. He was specially chosen because he'd had three mental breakdowns, They felt he would be a good guy to manipulate. Oh, I'm talking facts. I'll tell you the story of that. In my World in Review news magazine, I wrote that James I'm digressing a bit here, but it's necessary to do that now and then. It's not a sign of a bad speaker, although I don't put any laurels around my own neck. But James Earl Carter was not a known entity in American scene. I first heard of him through my intelligence contacts, particularly my French sources, who are one of the best in the world after MI six. And he told me, your next president is going to be a peanut farmer from Georgia. And I said, how come? He said, right now, they're meeting at the Dorchester Hotel in London. And if you get your penny over there, he said, you'll find that there's a lot of goings on you might like to look at. And lo and behold, that's what was happening. The Royal Institute for International Affairs had ordered David Rockefeller to find a candidate who was totally weak, preferably a little mentally weak. And they put one of the greatest brainwashing specialists in the world, trained by the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, Doctor. Peter Born, on the job. And he said, it's funny you should say that. One of my patients is a guy from Georgia, James Earl Carter. And this guy can't take rejections, and he's been to me three times for a nervous breakdown. So they hiked Carter over to London and faded him at the Dorchester Hotel, which is a very ritzy place. And they faded him and wine and dine him. And the next thing we saw, Time News wake every newspaper in the country, James Earl Carter. Now we, in our little magazine, World in Review, we told those of our subscribers, this man is your next president. We also did exactly the same thing with William Jefferson Clinton because we had the story of the club of Rome. We knew who Agnelli was. We knew that Agnelli had had a huge love affair with missus Pamela Harriman, and that missus Pamela Harriman was the doyen of the Democrat party, and missus Harriman been given a task of finding the next president of The United States a socialist. And she picked up Clinton and said, you're our boy. But there's one snag. Clinton went up there brushing his forelock back and said, well, you know, there's one problem. My wife left me. So missus Harriman was dumbfounded. She said, well, you better get this back in a hurry. And he said, no. She doesn't wanna come back to me because of my thrice with other woman. That's how he put it. My philanderings would have been a better word, but he said thrice with other woman. So missus Harriman sent for missus Clinton, and she duly came to New York. And she sat her down and said, look. If you want to be the first lady of the lady of America with all the attendant prestige and power, you better forget about your husband's philanderings and get right back to him. And that is precisely what happened. And when I heard that had happened, I knew this guy was the next president. And we wrote that in our news magazine. And sure enough, a year later, here came marching into the scene, William Jefferson Clinton. So the RIA, the Royal Institute for International Affairs, does control everything that happens in The United States. They give their orders to the Morgan Guarantee and Trust Bank on Wall Street. And the chief executive officer of that organization is Dennis Weatherstone. And he duly relays the orders over to the Secretary of State, whoever that happens to be. And he then relays the orders to the president. There was one exception to this, and that was during the illegal 100% unconstitutional Gulf War. Now I'm gonna use a word, and I apologize to the ladies for this, but I need to tell you this graphically to illustrate the power that the Royal Institute for International Affairs exercises over the affairs of The United States Of America. When George Bush was hesitating and didn't know whether he should get into The Gulf or not, the prime minister of Britain, missus Margaret Thatcher, came over to the committee of head of three hundred headquarters at the Aspen Institute Colorado, and this is the phone call that she had with George Bush. She said, George, this is Margaret. Apologies to you, ladies president. Get your ass up here. I've got some orders for you about the Gulf War. And Bush went scurrying up there like a little messenger boy. And the next thing we know, there was this massive outpouring of propaganda to start a war against the nation of Iran, a nation that had never done this country, one iota of harm. I use those illustrations in order to give you the extent of the control that is exercised by this committee of 300. There are many other societies that are operating for the RIIA. The Illuminati, which has been around for many, many years. I've written a work called The Illuminati in America 1784 to 1994. A lot of people think this is an ancient secret society that's gone away. They think that Adam Weisop had a quarrel with the Catholic church, and that's it. Don't you believe it? 13 of the top families in The United States are in the Illuminati today, and they have a big say on everything that happens politically in this country. Then we have the Society of Cincinnati, which I don't think many of you will have heard about. That is an ultra, ultra secret society to which every president of The United States is forced to belong, including our so called conservative presidents. And I point this out to you to show you that it doesn't matter who is in the White House. This committee of 300 through the Royal Institute for International Affairs, through the Council on Foreign Relations exercise exercises complete control. But their strongest arm is called the Club of Rome. Now when I first heard of the Club of Rome in 1969, I immediately began my investigation. And as Ken told you, all of my investigations have been done on location, every one of them. The Club of Rome is one of the most insidious, baneful organizations in existence today, which has done intolerable, immeasurable harm to The United States Of America. This committee of 300 told a man called Aurelio Pecki to form this club of Rome with the main object of bringing down the industries and the agricultural development of The United States. He immediately wrote a paper in which he said there are too many people on the earth and that The United States, with its industrial development, its agricultural development, is responsible for this curse of overpopulation. And he picked up the documentation for his work from lord Bertrand Russell, a senior statesman of the committee of three hundred. And Lord Bertrand Russell had written a work called The Impact of Science on Society. And if you can ever secure a copy of that book, which I doubt you'll be able to get, you will see in there that he said, the world is grossly overpopulated, and we have to get rid of at least half of the world's population, and it doesn't matter how we do it. So the Club of Rome was instituted and organized to start an attack on the world's population using The United States as the whipping boy. And they came up with a paper called the Zero Growth Post Industrial Plan for industry and agriculture for The United States Of America. Three days after that plan was accepted as official United States policy by James Earl Carter, I was able to, through my intelligence people, get a copy of this insidious document. Basically, what it said was that the middle class in The United States Of America had to be destroyed because in the coming push to a world order, the middle class would be the stumbling block because history had shown that the peasant class in ancient days, when they had revolted, were just easily crushed crushed. There was no resistance, but now had grown a new super class of people in The United States called the middle class who had long term employment, who had job security, who were well paid, who could afford to buy the products that were made by The United States and didn't need to buy products from China or anywhere else. And the Club of Rome post industrial zero growth paper said this has got to stop. We have to bring down the middle class of The United States. And the way that we will do this, the way that we will accomplish this task is by crushing their industries. In 1980, based on this report, I wrote a small work, a booklet called The Death of The United States Steel Industry. And in that, I told of a French aristocrat by the name of Etienne Darvignon, and I'm sure there's not a single steel worker in America out of a job who's ever heard of this man's name. But they put this aristocrat onto the job of destroying first the steel industry. In my book in 1980, I said that by 1985, we would have silent blast furnaces. The rolling mills would be stopped. There'd be no more shipbuilding. We'd have thousands of skilled workers who'd pass the skills of their trade down for generations who were forever dispossessed of their jobs. If you go to the Northeast United States today, ladies and gentlemen, and I've just been up in Cleveland where I had a very good radio address I gave there, you will find that what I said in 1980 has unhappily come to pass. In 1970, The United States had 5,000 ships built by good United States know how using good United States steel. 5,000 ships sailing the high seas. Last year, we had exactly 270 subships and at least 50,000 steelworkers permanently out of a job, jobs that will never come back. What happened? Did we suddenly lose our marvels? Did we suddenly lose that great American know how of getting things done? Did we lack finances? Did we run out of money? No. None of those things happened. What happened was this dastardly club of room had sent their emissaries to The United States to deliberately destroy our steel plants, and they did it by opening the doors of so called free trade. And everybody who signed the NAFTA treaty and everybody who signs the GATT treaty when it passes is a traitor and a seditionist. Our mighty steel industry is destroyed. Our shipyards are silent. Our skilled workers are permanently without a job. And if you don't believe me, get the report of the Club of Rome. You know, when I came out in 1969 with my report on the Club of Rome, nobody had ever heard of it. And people, when they got it, said, now this guy is paranoid. There's no such organization. It's probably something to do with the Catholic church. Well, surprise, surprise, twenty five years later, last year, the club of Rome celebrated its anniversary, and Alexander King, its chairman, stated the American people henceforth must get used to the idea that they will never ever again in their lifetime have full employment. What a scandalous thing that our government is fully cooperating with this organization built up by the Royal Institute for International Affairs to destroy the middle class of The United States and to add to the policies of global genocide. That brings me to the next question. What is the global two thousand? Once again, when I heard about this policy, it was three days after it had been accepted by the United States government as its official policy. And the Global 2,000 was a blueprint for mass genocide produced by the Club of Rome. Basically, what the Global two thousand calls for is the destruction of half of the world's population by the year 2050, hence the title 2,000. They built a case based on Bertrand Russell and H. G. Wells' findings that the world was going to be overpopulated, would be a terrible place to live in. That was picked up by a fellow called Robert Strange McNamara, and a stranger individual you're not likely to meet in this world. And this man had a conference of all the leading bankers about twelve years ago, and he said the biggest menace facing the world today is the American middle class and overpopulation. He linked the two together. And he said, by the year 2050, this is the state of the world. All of these unfed, unwashed people, no jobs. He said, do we want to live in a world like that? So the global two thousand was a genocidal plan to take care of the people of The United States who don't have any jobs and who, like Alexander King said, are never going to get their jobs back, and the masses of people in other nations. That is why we had the sudden appearance of AIDS. And I was told there's a CAB experiment, that's chemical and bacteriological water experiment going on in Sierra Leone in Africa. That's a remote corner of Africa, West Africa, just above Liberia. If you look at your map and your atlas, and you'll see where it's located. Why Liberia? Extremely hard country to get to. You have to fly from London. That's the only way you can get there. You land on an island, and then you've got to take a ferry across to the Mainland. And, of course, all people taking the the ferry are heavily scrutinized. And I managed to work my way. I was told the Americans were doing the CAB experiment. I managed to work my way to within striking distance of a small mission station. And what I discovered was that these blacks were coming in from the bush to this mission station with broken arms or ulcer on the leg or something like that, and they were extensively being treated there, but they were dead by the evening. What was actually going on was that a laboratory had been set up using Lassa fever virus. Now at that time, Lassa fever was the one was one of four viruses that could jump the human animal barrier, and it was a deadly virus. They were trying to create a virus that could be mass produced and it could be sent out through the World Health Organization to get rid of millions of people in the world. But the Lassa fever virus proved uncontrollable. It killed three scientists who were working there. So the orders came from Washington, burned the place to the ground, and that's exactly what they did within a radius of a 100 miles. They bottled up some of these viruses they'd been experimenting with and took them back to the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta. There, they began again, but again, they escaped and killed three more scientists. So they incinerated the whole laboratory, seal it off and incinerated. The same experiments are now going on in Harvard University right now, but they're not using the Lassa fever virus. That has proved to be too tough for them to handle. Instead, the United States government gave millions of dollars to the United States military chemical and bacteriological warfare establishment at Fort Detrick, and they began experimenting with the AIDS virus. I knew about the AIDS three years before the word ever came out in the world, in The United States particularly, because of my field work in Sierra Leone. The British government used their Fortin Down CAB facility. It's easier to get into the Bank of England boss than to get into Fortin Down. All the deadliest viruses in the world are being crafted there. In pursuance of the goal of Global two thousand to decimate the world. Shortly after this experiment had finished at Fort Detrick, the World Health Organization started a massive vaccination campaign. They said, for once and for all, we're going to wipe out the scourge of smallpox. They chose Africa and Brazil, launched a massive vaccination campaign. Immediately, AIDS began to appear. Thousands and thousands of people began dying of a strange new virus, which the World Health Organization then said had come from the bite of a green monkey. They forgot to tell you the green monkey's been there for centuries, and he'd been biting people if he ever did for centuries, but no disease of that nature had ever occurred. The World Health Organization deliberately took this virus, which was crafted from a series of animal viruses, including mediastinum sheep, which destroys the brain, which is why you find AIDS patients get dementia probably first before any of the other AIDS related complex diseases appear. And they began vaccinating innocent people on the massive scale, and they began dying like flies. Why Africa and why Brazil? Because those two countries had the biggest black population in the world. And I want to tell the black people of The United States Of America, do not trust the Democrat party. Do not trust government. Do not believe that government is your friend. To you, they to them, you are dispensable the same way as we are. Millions of people died. I went through Uganda on an inspection tour, and I saw whole areas decimated where previously there had been small towns and villages. There was not a living soul in sight. And that is going on today. The AIDS epidemic is completely out of hand. It swept the world. It's been swept under the carpet in The United States Of America. We were told that this is a disease which is passed by homosexuals. True enough, but that's not the primary cause of it. This is a crafted virus that was spread throughout the world to decimate the population. Coming behind them, and we reported this about two years ago in our World Interview News magazine, is the v b r o nineteen cholera virus, the deadly killer. You get this cholera in the morning. If it's not immediately treated with massive doses of expensive antibiotics, you'll be dead in a day and a half. This epidemic swept India, carrying away millions of people. I don't know if you've heard of it in the press. I doubt it. Behind that is a deadly strain of malaria, and some of our forces in Somalia contracted this disease, a strain of malaria which acts almost like the HIV virus. It attacks the human immune system. And behind that, the black plague. Now you've had some experience with black plague recently. Experiments were conducted in this area and in California with the black plague distributing them, these plague viruses, to definitive areas by means of encoded scalar waves using extremely low frequency radiation, which was a warping technique developed in 1934 by the great Soviet virologist, V. A. Gurchev. This is not Buck Rogers stuff, ladies and gentlemen. This is today's deadly truth. So some of the end of of the Indian reservations were targeted, and all of a sudden, they began dying of black plague. And then we were told, well, the harvest mouse droppings are responsible. Well, the harvest mouse has been doing these droppings for centuries, but none of them got the black plague before that. But what happened immediately following the so called population control meeting in Cairo, there was a sudden and violent outbreak of black plague in India. And it is still going on, and it is not under control. This is all part of the global two thousand mass genocide plan. I know something about the black plague because in my research in the British Museum, I discovered that the black Venetian nobility had never none of their families or members had ever got the black plague. Yet the black plague, as you know, swept through Europe and killed half of the population of Europe, but none of their families ever got it. So I began seeking for the answers, I found them in the Cairo Museum. So they people said, well, how come if these things are true, how are they going to protect themselves? They have they being the committee of 300, their servants, and their families, they have the means of protecting themselves by certain types of herbal compounds mixed with sugar. And they also have, of course, the protection of extremely low frequency radiation where using the technology developed by the great virologist, Gertrude, who proved that every living thing on this earth has a vibratory cycle. And he was able to measure the vibratory cycle of various deadly viruses. And by vibrating them double their cycle, you would kill them instantly. So that's one of the defensive weapons that these people have got that will kill the plague if they ever get it. The same technique, of course, will kill cancer cells. But the medical profession run by the Rockefeller family and all the pharmaceutical companies do not want you to know this because when you go into the doctor, he's gonna write you a prescription for a chemical drug. There's no chemical drug benefit out of extremely low frequency radiation vibration. No profit to these people. So that's the Global 2,000. Decimate the world's population and particularly hit hard The United States middle class. How are they financing all of this stuff? They're financing it through the fundee who I mentioned to you earlier, the Venetian black nobility. Now why are they called the black nobility? They called that because of the vileness and the evilness of their deeds. These families date back to the eleventh centuries, the Lucatis, the Recanatis. They were called and the Gelts, by the way, I'll come to them. They're particularly interesting. They were called that because of the evilness of their deeds. They made Lucrezia Borgia look like a Sunday school teacher. They had so much money, which was the outcome of the drug trade, the years of investing, the years of gaining control of every mining, mineral, gold, oil, natural resource of the world, that they can afford to finance these things. So the black nobility or the ancient aristocrats of Venice and Genoa, and they called that because of the nature of their deeds. The black Gaels were one of the worst of them. Now interesting enough, the Queen of England, Queen Elizabeth II, is a Gael. She's not a Windsor. This was a title that was evolved in 1935 by her father to put researchers off the track. I like to include myself in that category, although I wasn't doing it then. I was much too young to be doing it. But he didn't like that certain people were getting hot on the track of who this royal family actually was. And so this was put out that they are the House of Windsor. Are not. They are the House of Gelf, and it's important for us to know that because every time there's a financial crisis, it follows a meeting of the Black Gelfs upon the Royal Britannia yacht of the Queen of England, which anchors off the coast of Venice. And all the world bankers meet over there and say, now this is what we're going to do to country x. This is how we're going to control this worldwide situation. And then they go up and give their orders to everybody. So that is the way it is done. I told you earlier that they control The United States even in the days of president Lincoln. They had him assassinated on the orders of the Israeli. And they then, of course, in later years, were able to elect one of the worst socialists we've ever had, the worst misfortune to suffer under, Woodrow Wilson. Wilson was elected by a ploy. Of course, they got Teddy Roosevelt and the Bull Moose party running as a supposedly third candidate to siphon votes off so that Wilson could be elected as a socialist president. Now our eyes have been fixed on Moscow. We've been led down the garden path, ladies and gentlemen. All of the time, we've been looking at Moscow, and we've been told what demons they are in Moscow. Rightly so. But all the time this was going on, the Trojan horse of socialism in Washington DC has been stealing our country away from us. And in my book, socialism, the road to slavery, I give you a full and factual description of exactly how this was done. In 1898, the Fabian Society, a socialist organization, said sent Ramsay MacDonald, prime minister of England, to The United States to spy out the land. He came back, and he said, there are two things in the way. You have a very strong middle class, and you have the constitution of The United States, both of which have got to be destroyed before we can socialize America. The first step they took was getting a socialist president in office in the form of Woodrow Wilson. Woodrow Wilson was controlled out of England by sir William Wiseman, head of the North American desk of MI six. Now in case you don't know MI six, it is the most powerful and the oldest of all intelligence agencies in the world. They taught the CIA. They taught the Vatican intelligence. They taught the French intelligence. They taught the Mossad. They taught the checker. Captain Hill of MI six went out and set up the Mossad. And captain Hill went to Russia and helped the Bolsheviks set up their single cell apparatus. Sir William Wiseman was the controller of Wilson through Colonel House. Now who was Colonel House? He was an unknown person who emerged out of Texas. His father served the Rothschild during the civil war, and he emerged out of the war as the only person in Texas who had made any money. And House was sent to Washington in order to control the first socialist president, and he took his orders from Wiseman. And House lived about a few blocks away from Wilson. And above him, Weisman had an apartment. And that type of control is not gone. It is still here to this very day, right now, as I speak to you. Other questions. Give us some examples of what you're talking. How do we know that what you're saying is true? I'll refer you to the great soldier's son of The United States Of America, General Douglas MacArthur, a great patriot, a great warrior, a great Christian. When Douglas MacArthur was in Korea, he and General Strattermeer of the Air Force devised a plan that would have put China out of action for the next fifty years. He submitted this plan to Washington, an arch socialist, one of the most vilest preachers who ever walked this earth by the name of Dean Rusk, immediately summoned the president of The United States to a meeting in Blair House. And he said, mister president, we have seen the plan submitted by general Douglas MacArthur, and there's no way in the world that you can allow him to implement this plan. And Truman said, why not? He said, you know very well that anything that relates to China has to be cleared by the Royal Institute for International Affairs first. And he said they don't want you to do this. And MacArthur was not allowed to carry out his plan. And 50,000 sons, beautiful Americans, were slaughtered on the battlefields of Korea needlessly because of orders from the Royal Institute for International Affairs, and that same institute is controlling president William Jefferson to this day. MacArthur was eventually bola hatted on the orders of the British government. I mentioned earlier the death of John F. Kennedy. Given the methods that are well known in intelligence circles of how to get rid of bothersome people, It would have been a very simple matter to make it look as though Kennedy had died of a heart attack or some other natural cause. Instead of that, in order to warn every president that would follow in his wake, every powerful person in this country in the know, you do not kick over the traces. You obey us, or you will see what will happen to you. Kennedy was publicly and brutally executed in a plan carried out by British MI six under the control of sir William Stevenson and his lieutenant, a Canadian citizen by the name of major Louis Mortimer Bloomfield. Now you won't get that in any of the accounts of the Kennedy assassination. You'll find it in my book, the committee of three hundred. You'll also find it in my monographs about the Kennedy assassination. Who are these people? Sir William Stevenson ran American intelligence throughout the second World War out of the RCA Building in New York. His second in command, a Canadian citizen, major Louis Mortimer Bloomfield, ran division five of the FBI counterintelligence. You want examples of how Britain controls this country, I have given you them. I've also told you that every secretary of state since 1919 is selected by the Royal Institute for International Affairs on the orders of the Committee of Three Hundred. Why is this? We go to these conventions, and there's all the hoopla in the world. The balloons are flying. The straw boaters are in the air. Bush has been elected conservative president. Reagan has been elected. What happens in reality? The secretary of state who's charged with carrying out the policies subverts each and every one of them. You show me a secretary of state that has acted in the best interest of The United States Of America since 1919, and I will give you the only money that I've got in the bank, which is about $1,500. You're welcome to it because I know that you will not be able to do that. Every secretary of state has subverted and acted in a treasonable manner towards the people of this great country. And when they haven't done it directly, they've done it through surrogates like Lachlan Curry, who ordered the military to jettison a shipment of arms destined for the great Chinese leader, Chiang Kai shek, to jettison overboard these arms in the Indian Ocean, and that's exactly what they did. We think that we elect our presidents. Ladies and gentlemen, we do not elect our presidents. They are selected for us long before we'd even heard of them, and I've given you two examples this morning of how this is done. The three hundred office at Aspen keeps a tight control over every political event that takes place in this country. And it was this office through Margaret Thatcher that ordered president Bush to violate the constitution of The United States Of America and to violate his own personal oath to uphold the laws of The United States by sending our troops to the Gulf War against Iraq, a nation that had never done us any harm. And we did it by the dirtiest of dirtiest tricks. We got the daughter of one of the Al Shabaq clan, over 400 of these people, and they are these are the most degenerate, disgusting people that you'd ever come across. The ruler has a 140 wives. He doesn't have them all at the same time. When he gets tired of one, he says, I divorced thee. I divorced thee three times, and she's gone. When the Iraqi troops came in there, and they turned it over to the Red Cross in Geneva, a 140 marriage certificates. This was the man that your sons and your daughters are propping up today in Kuwait in a most illegal manner in violation of the constitution of The United States Of America. And Bush did a Texas two step around the constitution. He did not get the mandatory declaration of war. I'm not a lawyer, but I've studied the annals of congress, the congressional votes, and the congressional records for twenty five years. And in those pages will be found more wisdom, more in-depth information about the constitution than you'll ever get from any law school. Anyway, most of the law schools have professors far to the left of Marx, and they don't know anything much about the constitution. I talked to a few people, one lawyer in congress, and said, what do you know about the con the constitution? Well, I got one semester of law when I was at law school on the and the in that was something about the constitution. Our constitution is not even taught in The United States school system. Isn't that an utter shame and a resounding disgrace? Bush said the troops Bush did not get a constitutional declaration of war. This is a very difficult area of the constitution. It's probably one of the most complex areas of the constitution. It's a five step process that involves both houses making separate declarations, then joint declarations. Then the army has to be informed, and then the public has to be informed. And then we have to be told whether it's a a private war or a public war, I. E, whether all the armed forces are going to be employed or only one branch. In so called police actions, the president has forty five days to use only one branch of the service. Bush violated his oath of office by going to the United Nations to which we do not belong and getting them to give him a so called color so that he could send our troops to The Gulf. Our troops to this day are in The Gulf illegally in violation of the constitution of America, and we're still paying for it. The story that the Gulf states put up all the money, you're gonna ask the general accounting office as I did, how much money have they paid. We are still paying for the Gulf War. And now we've got another huge bill to meet, billions of dollars for Clinton's fantasies to go out there and support this disgusting Al Sabah clan. I don't know if you know the story of Kuwait. It's really a horrendous one. I don't want to get into that too much, but that land was stolen from the Iraqi people by the British imperialists. They came in and drew a line through the sand right through the middle of the most important oil field that had just been discovered, the Rommelier Oil Field. They then thought this is gonna be called to wait. And they brought up these tame sheiks from Bahrain and put them in as the rulers. And since then, they've been stealing the oil off Iran, and the proceeds go to the British banks in the city of London for the Committee of three hundred. They're just doing the same thing now in South Africa with the gold. That's part of their tactics to gain control of all natural resources through the world. I also touched briefly on Giovanni Agnelli and Mrs. Clinton and how she had left her husband and Pamela Harriman. Pamela Harriman, for her duties in getting Clinton elected, was given a plum job as ambassador for The United States to France. And this is what happens to the traitors. Patriots are punished, and traitors traitors are rewarded. Dennis de Consigni, who voted for the giveaway of our property in Panama and who voted for the crime bill and every other obscenity that is passed by the federal government in violation of the constitution. He's now going to get a plum ambassadorship when he retires top of his huge pension of something like 200,000 a year. I've been asked whether Clinton will stay the full term. Yes. He will. Clinton will stay the full term because he's been given a job to do, and that is to pass certain far reaching socialist measures. And he's been very successful in doing that with the help of so called Republicans. I personally am not in favor of political parties. I'm like George Washington. He said political parties are baneful, and in the long run, they are harmful. What happened in NAFTA, a so called conservative, mister Newt Gingrich, who I wouldn't trust as far as I could throw him, went out and acted as the floor manager, as the party whip in true parliamentary style, and he whipped up a 132 Republicans, so called, to support NAFTA. And no doubt he will do the same thing with this dreadful GAP treaty, which is coming up in a vote in the lame duck session. So he's going to run. And I'll let you into some information which I just got a few days ago from French intelligence. Clinton would not be able to run on his record or anything that he's done or anything meritorious. So what he's done, he sent emissaries, and this is the first time you're gonna hear this. Might hear it in 1996, but this is the first time you're gonna hear this now. He has sent emissaries to Iran to dig and dig and promise huge sums of money to any of the Iranians who will come up with the actual documentation of the scandal where our prisoners were kept there until Reagan was elected the president. And if he can come up with this documentation, he's going to keep them. In 1996, he's going to come out and say to America, I have here documentary proof of how bad your Republicans are, president Bush and Reagan. Look what they did. And on the strength of that, he hopes to run-in 1996. That's what he's doing now. He's taking the money that he's not entitled to, and he's using it to bribe the Iranians to come up with these documents. I don't know that they will because I think they like him even less than I do, and that's saying a lot. What is the Clinton agenda? Clinton has been instructed to socialize America. And let me tell you that the enemy in Washington is more to be feared than the enemy in Moscow. I've said this for years. And we have creeping socialism in this country today, which has nowhere to go but to communism in the new world order, one world government. That is the direction that William Jefferson Clinton is pushing this country as hard as he can go. Nothing has changed. The con the constitution of The United States is immutable. I violently disagree with justice Ginsburg, who says the constitution is flexible. The constitution is not flexible. Our founding fathers meant it to be an immutable document that would stand the test of the ages of time and foil people like William Jefferson Clinton and Roosevelt and every other dictator that is going to follow unless we stand up and take our back our states right. In future, historians are going to say, this was the maddest nation on earth to allow this insidious war to be waged against them. And that's what it is, ladies and gentlemen. This is a war to the death for The United States Of America. The only thing that is making it unrecognizable as a war, there are no big drums being beaten. There are no flags waving, but we are being insidiously destroyed in a trade war. And GATT is a coup de grace to kill off the American middle class for once and for all. This is a war to the death against the people of The United States. The Committee of Three Hundred wants to reduce us through socialism into a nation no better than the third world countries. That is the aim and object of all of this. Once a nation has destabilized, it's very easy to deal with it and push it into a socialist new world order, a one world government. Ladies and gentlemen, I want to say to you today, the time has come for us to recognize that we are 50 individual nations. We have all the rights of an individual nation. We gave only limited empowerments to the federal government. They have grossly, flagrantly violated the concord that we have with them. Therefore, we, the masters, have the right to go to Washington and tell them the servants. Henceforth, this Concordat is severed unless we understand from today all of these unconstitutional measures will be rolled back, and a new system will come into being. The Federal Reserve Bank, that private enterprise bank will be put out of business. Ladies and gentlemen, this is not anarchy. This is the god given right of each of the 50 nations of which the state of New Mexico is an individual nation. We are the only entity in the entire world that has a legal document that allows us to dissolve the federal government without resorting to violence and bloodshed.
Saved - December 22, 2025 at 10:17 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I describe a plan to introduce AI and transhumanism that could extinguish humanity. Great Resets happened before. It doesn’t matter if the video is AI or human-made; it’s worth reading. We’re at stage 3—Obedience. Ponder this before sleep.

@DarrenPlymouth - Darren of Plymouth

This video is a description of the plan to introduce AI and transhumanism, eventually leading to the extinction of humanity. Great Resets have happened before. It doesn't matter if this video is AI or made by a human, it is definitely something worth reading. We are at stage 3 -Obedience. Something for you to think about before you go to sleep.

Saved - November 14, 2025 at 2:57 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I envision a future Europe where people are a Eurasian-Negroid mix with varied personalities, the Jews in leading positions by Providence, and the White races destroyed and replaced by a Eurasian-Negroid order easily controlled by a ruling elite.

@wolsned - Darren of Plymouth

THE KALERGI PLAN The Genocide of all White People "The future man will be mixed-race. As for Pan-Europe, I wish to see a Eurasian-Negroid mixture with great variation in personality types. The Jews shall take the leading positions, since Providence (God) has given Europe a spiritually superior race of nobility called, The Jews. The White races of Europe should be destroyed and replaced with a race of Eurasian-Negroids who can be easily controlled by us ruling elite." -Count Richard Von Coudenhove-Kalergi Founder and Pres of Pan-European Union for 49 years Written in his book 'Praktischer Idealismus' 1924

Saved - November 10, 2024 at 12:36 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I believe everyone has committed crimes, and the truth will eventually come to light. This situation feels like a large-scale experiment on humanity. As the consequences unfold, those in power will find it increasingly difficult to escape accountability.

@wolsned - Darren of Plymouth 🇬🇧

“You have all committed crimes. It will collapse, because the truth will surface. This has been a large scale experiment of gain of function on the human population. This will be recorded in history for many many generations to come” Geert Van Den Bosche on COVID vaccines. The truth always outs in the end, but this time, as the bodies pile up, it will leave the criminals in power no place to hide.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many individuals recognize their mistakes but feel they cannot admit them due to fear of backlash. They hope for distractions from the issues at hand, but those distractions are unlikely to come. This group, feeling protected by their numbers, resembles a mafia, believing that their collective strength shields them from accountability. However, the truth will eventually emerge, leading to a collapse of their facade. This situation represents a significant experiment on humanity that will be remembered for generations, far surpassing the discussions following World Wars I and II.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If these people would now go out and say, oh, wait a minute, yeah, we have been making some mistakes, it wasn't all right, we have to correct them and we have to revise our opinion, these people would be stoned in the street, right? They have no choice they have no choice than other than to stick even if they completely see how wrong they have been. They have no other choice. They can only hope that something will happen that will distract from this issue, that will distract it, but it won't. It won't. And so they keep silent or they just continue, you know, along the path that they have been walking along so far. But, I can tell you that many of them must be desperate that, you know, being together, they feel protected, you know. This is a big lobby. This is a big lobby and they think that everybody thinks that the other will protect them, right, which is not the case, but this is this typically this typical feeling. You all have committed crimes, but you are a big group and it's like the mafia and you feel altogether, you feel like a big team and nobody can penetrate into the team, etcetera. It will collapse because the surface the the the truth will surface. This has been a large scale experiment of gain of function on the very human population. This is something that, you know, will be reported in history for many, many generations to come, much longer than the talks that have, you know, taken place after World War I and World War II, etcetera.
Saved - July 19, 2024 at 5:39 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Do you believe Net Zero is about reducing the world's population? https://t.co/5Uz4YNqS1l

Video Transcript AI Summary
Patrick Moore, a Greenpeace co-founder, recently claimed that achieving net zero emissions could lead to the death of half the world's population. Some believe this is part of a depopulation agenda aimed at reducing the global population by 7.5 billion people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As you know, the one of the cofounders of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, he's recently said that if we get to net 0, half of the population of the world will die. Now many will say that that's part of the point that, you know, the agenda, the depopulation agenda, if it's if it does exist, is to remove 7 and a half 1000000000 people from the world.
Saved - June 17, 2024 at 10:46 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

The best explanation of 9/11 ever. https://t.co/T7oJrBxllt

Video Transcript AI Summary
On September 11, 2001, 19 hijackers carried out attacks in the U.S. The official narrative blames Osama bin Laden, but many inconsistencies and cover-ups exist. The 9/11 Commission failed to address key questions, and government agencies destroyed evidence. The media pushes the official story and discredits any skepticism. The truth remains obscured, and dissent is discouraged. This message is sponsored by various government agencies and the mainstream media.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On the Speaker 1: morning of September 11, 2001, 19 men armed with box cutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily defended airspace in the world. Overpowering the passengers in the military combat train pilots on 4 commercial aircraft before flying those planes wildly off course for over an hour without being molested by a single fighter interceptor. These 19 hijackers, devout religious fundamentalists who like to drink alcohol, snort cocaine, and live with pink haired strippers, managed to knock down 3 buildings with 2 planes in New York. While in Washington, a pilot who couldn't handle a single engine Cessna was able to fly a 757 in an 8,000 foot descending 270 degree corkscrew turn to come exactly level with the ground. Hitting the Pentagon in the budget analyst office where DOD staffers were working on the mystery of the $2,300,000,000,000 that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had announced missing from the Pentagon's coffers in a press conference the the day before on September 10, 2001. Luckily, the news anchors knew who did it within minutes. Speaker 0: Osama Bin Laden. Speaker 1: The pundits knew within hours. Osama bin Laden. The administration knew within the day. Speaker 0: Terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them. Speaker 1: And the evidence literally fell into the FBI's lap. Speaker 0: That a hijacker's passport was found blocks from the World Trade Center crash site. If you can believe that. Speaker 1: But for some reason, a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists demanded an investigation is the greatest attack on American soil in history. That investigation was delayed, underfunded, set up to fail, a conflict of interest, and a cover up from start to finish. It was based on testimony extracted through torture, the records of which were destroyed. It failed to mention the existence of WTC 7, Abel Danger, P TECH, Sibel Edmonds, OBL and the CIA, and the drills of hijacked aircraft being flown into buildings that were being simulated at the precise same time that those events were actually happening. It was lied to by the Pentagon, the CIA, the Bush administration. And as for Bush and Cheney, well, no one knows what they told it because they testified in secret, off the record, not under oath, and behind closed doors. It didn't bother to look at who funded the attacks because that question is ultimately of little practical significance. Still, the 911 commission did brilliantly answering all of the questions the public had, except most of the victim's family members' questions, and pinned blame on all the people responsible, although no one so much has lost their job. Determining the attacks were Failure of imagination. Because Speaker 0: obey our government at least, and I don't think the prior government could envision flying airplanes into buildings. Speaker 1: Except the Pentagon, FEMA, NORAD, and the NRO. The DIA destroyed 2.5 terabytes of data on Able Danger, but that's okay because it probably wasn't important. The SEC destroyed their records on the investigation into the insider trading before the attacks, but that's okay because destroying the records of the largest investigation in SEC history is just part of routine record keeping. NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC seven's collapse, but that's okay because knowing how they made their model of the collapse would jeopardize public safety. The FBI has argued that all material related to their investigation of 911 should be kept secret from the public, but that's okay because the FBI probably has nothing to hide. This man never existed nor is anything he had to say worthy of your attention. And if you say otherwise, you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist and deserve to be shunned by all of humanity. Likewise, him, him, him, and her, and her, and her, and him. Osama bin Laden lived in the cave fortress in the hills of Afghanistan, but somehow got away. Then he was hiding out in Toribora, but somehow got away. Then he lived in Abbottabad for years, taunting the most comprehensive intelligence dragnet employing the most sophisticated technology in the history of the world for a decade, releasing video after video with complete impunity and getting younger and younger as he did so before finally being found in a daring seal team raid which wasn't recorded on video, in which he didn't resist or use his wife as a human shield, and in which these crack special forces operatives panicked and killed this unarmed man, supposedly the best source of intelligence about those dastardly terrorists on the entire planet. Then they dumped his body in the ocean before telling anyone about it. Then a couple dozen of that team's members died in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan. This is the story of 911 brought to you by the media which told you the hard truths about. Speaker 0: His head could be seen to move violently forward. Speaker 1: And Speaker 0: They took the babies out of incubation. Speaker 1: And Mobile production facilities. And The rescue of Jessica Lynch. If you have any questions about this story, you are a batshit, paranoid, tinfoil, dog abusing baby hater and will be reviled by everyone. If you love your country and or freedom, happiness, rainbows, rock and roll, puppy dogs, apple pie, and your grandma, you will never ever express doubts about any part of this story to anyone. Ever. This has been a public service announcement by the friends of the FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA, SEC, MSM, White House, NIST, and the 9/11 Commission. Because ignorance is strength. Speaker 0: I I I was the CIA director. We lied. We cheated on steel. It's It's like we we had we had entire we had entire training courses.
Saved - May 30, 2024 at 12:35 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Every aspect of COVID was a lie. https://t.co/pKz7YQpY8i

Saved - May 25, 2024 at 10:29 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Remember when people were arrested for filming empty hospitals? Well it was confirmed in the Scottish Covid Inquiry that hospitals were in fact empty. Funny that. https://t.co/P2ndlGS6HH

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video shows an empty hospital with no patients, which angers the speaker. They criticize the lack of treatment available for those in need, especially during the holiday season. The speaker expresses frustration at the hospital's conditions, including closed wards and shops. They also condemn Macmillan Cancer Support for their involvement in NHS privatization. Overall, the speaker is upset by the state of the hospital and the lack of services being provided.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hospital. Look. Look at it. This is a disgrace. I've never seen oh my god. Look at this. It is so dead. Please do not sit here. Yeah. Not much chance of that, is there? All the people in our country desperately waiting for treatment, cancer treatment, heart disease. Look at this. This honestly, this is making me so angry walking around here. This is making me angry. Show the hell out of this guy's truth. Look at the truth here. Do not come back to this post with bullshit when there's a completely empty hospital I'm walking around. I'm so angry. Not only am I angry for all the people. Look. I'm looking into a ward. Look. Look at this ward here. What is this ward? Mine injury units. This is a mine injury unit. Oh my god. Look at it. All the people this time of year that would normally be in here do not being denied treatment. This is a disgrace. I am so angry. I to be honest, I wasn't expecting it to be quite as quiet as this. I expected a few more people around. There's absolutely nobody. No securities. Where's the security staff? The I haven't even seen them. Lights off in there. Cardiology. Look, lights are off. What a joke. Look at this. Macmillan. This is disgusting. Macmillan cancer cancer table. Of course, Macmillan, for those of you that don't know, have been key in the privatization of the n h NHS where these huge companies, pharmaceutical companies, have come in and taken over and privatized everything. Remember that when you do these stupid things online for Macmillan, don't get involved. They are a disgrace. Macmillan is a disgrace. So the canteen is closed. The shop I've been in the hospital before for various things and this shop is normally
Saved - March 30, 2024 at 8:44 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Since 2022, there have been more excess deaths in the UK than civilian deaths in World War II. The same goes for the USA, where excess deaths are ten times greater than losses in the Vietnam War. Surprisingly, the ONS has altered the way they record excess deaths, yet there is a lack of response or inquiry.

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

A quick reminder there have been more excess deaths since 2022 than UK civilians died during World War II. No questions, no investigation, a deafening silence. In the USA, excess deaths are ten times greater than total US losses during the Vietnam War. Now the ONS have changed the way the record excess deaths. And no one bats an eyelid.

Saved - March 14, 2024 at 9:21 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Not so safe now are they Rishi. No booing for vaccine injuries. The dam has collapsed. https://t.co/XdqkKQe4KT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thank you for discussing COVID-19 vaccine damage. I sympathize with those affected. I will arrange a meeting with the secretary to discuss your bill. We are reviewing policies to ensure proper support is provided.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joe. Mister speaker, may I thank my right honorable friend for meeting me 6 weeks ago to discuss the plight of victims of COVID 19 vaccine damage. And may I ask him, following that discussion and his very sympathetic response during the GB People's Forum to mister John Watts, who himself is a victim of COVID 19 vaccine damage, whether the government will be supporting my COVID 19 vaccine payments bill this Friday. Speaker 1: And do this, sir? Mister speaker, can I thank my honorable friend for raising the issue and the conversation that I had with him previously and extend my sympathies to all of those who have been affected by this? I I will, of course, make sure that he can meet with the secretary of escape to discuss his bill. And as I committed him, we are looking at the issue in some detail to make sure that the policies we've got are providing the support that they need to.
Saved - February 14, 2024 at 5:59 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

"Let me be unequivocal from this despatch box, COVID vaccines are safe" Rush Sunak "I want you to look into my eyes Rishi Sunak, at the pain, the trauma, and regret" John Watt Millions have been injured and killed, Sunak can only lie and smirk. 🤬 https://t.co/wvFxvIIKgE

Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID vaccines are declared safe by Speaker 0. Speaker 1 expresses pain, trauma, and regret due to lack of help for vaccine injuries. They mention others with amputations and heart conditions, and question why support is lacking. They criticize the vaccine damage payment scheme and highlight over 30,000 adverse reactions in Scotland. Speaker 1 demands that Rashid Shunaka do the right thing. Speaker 0 responds by stating that decisions during the pandemic were based on medical advice from experts, guiding vaccine rollout and eligibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me be unequivocal from this dispatch box that COVID vaccines are safe. Mister speaker. Speaker 1: I want you to look into my eyes, Rashid Shunaka. I want you to look at the pain, the trauma, and the regret I have in my eyes. We have been left with no help at all. Not only am I in here with this vaccine injured, there's another man over there whose life's been ruined by that COVID 19 vaccine. I know people who have lost legs, amputations. I know people with heart conditions like myself, Rishi Sunak. Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people that have been affected by that COVID 19 vaccine? Why are the people who are in charge who told us all to do the right thing have left us all tear up and left me and the 1,000 and the tens of 1,000 in this country to rot. Rashid Shoonyak, look me in the eye. When are you going to start to do the right thing? The vaccine damage payment scheme is not fit for purpose. In Scotland right now, according to the yellow card system, There are over 30,000 people who have had an adverse reaction to that vaccine. Okay. Deaths. John, thank you very much indeed for your question. You you start doing the right thing, mister Rashid Shunaka. The of what you've seen. I think Speaker 0: I've seen The last thing I'd say is, you know, we went through a pandemic like everyone else. At the points when it came to the Seeing those decisions were always taken on the basis of medical advice from our medical experts to tell us as politicians who are obviously not doctors about How best to roll out the vaccine? What was in the public health interest? The priority order? How that should be done? Who should be eligible? That was something that the doctors recommended on, and that's
Saved - February 3, 2024 at 3:12 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The government knew the vaccines were not proven safe or effective, as stated by Mark Sexton. The South African Pfizer contract revealed unknown side effects and effectiveness. The contract was signed months after the public was told it was a miracle cure. This is seen as a crime against the people, with Pfizer accused of fraud. It is time for accountability and a criminal investigation.

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Our Government knew the vaccines were not 'safe' or 'effective'. Mark Sexton (former police officer) The South African Pfizer contract clearly states that side effect were unknown, effectiveness in preventing 'disease' was unknown. The South African Pfizer contract was signed on April Fools, months after rollout, months after UK public was told by Johnson, Whitty, Valance, et al, that it was a miracle cure. Our Government have committed a crime against its people, democide, Pfizer have committed fraud. We need to rise up against this, please include your MPs twitter handle in the thread of this tweet. Time for accountability. Repost - we demand a criminal investigation

Video Transcript AI Summary
Retired police constable Mark Sexton raises concerns about the contract between Pfizer and the South African government regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. He highlights that the contract states the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not known, contradicting claims made by the UK government. Sexton suggests that if the UK contract is similar, the government knowingly misled the public. He calls for legal action against the government and Pfizer, accusing them of fraud and crimes against humanity. Sexton urges the Metropolitan Police to investigate and emphasizes the need for accountability and justice for the victims. He provides a link to the contract for further examination. (147 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Mark Sexton. I'm a retired police constable from Birmingham. Today is Friday, 2nd February 2024, and it's approximately 8 PM. The reason I'm making this video is for a really, really important contract that's come to my attention. This is the contract. This is the contract that Pfizer signed with the South African government in relation to the COVID 19 vaccine. What concerns me about this contract is if The UK signed a contract the same as or very similar as this. We are in trouble, and I'll tell you why. The South African Supreme Court ordered the South African government to release the contract for the public to scrutinize. And that happened before Christmas last year, I believe, September, October last year 2023. I've looked through this contract. What concerns me is a number of things. 1st of all, and I will provide the link so you can access this contract, When you go to page number 7, which I've highlighted, And it's there and you'll be able to see it for yourself. 1.56, section 1.56, vaccine, shall include all vaccines manufactured in whole or in part or supplied directly or indirectly by or on behalf of Pfizer or BioNTech or any of their affiliates that have intended Intended for the purpose prevention for the purpose of prevention of the human disease, COVID 19, or any other human disease in each case which is caused by any of the virus, SARS CoV-two, and or any or all related strains, mutations, modifications or derivatives of the foregoing that are procured by purchaser. The vaccines are intended for the prevention of the vaccines, but they're not preventing it, are they? So the word prevention in the dictionary, very specific, prevention is the act of stopping something from happening. But we now know and have known for a long time that the vaccines are not preventing SARS CoV to COVID 19 or any of the mutations. So that is false information. Maybe at the time they thought so, but that suggests to me that those vaccines I'm not doing what they said on the tin. Naughty naughty, Pfizer. So going back and looking at page 21 section 5.5, There it is there, section 5.5. This is very interesting. Purchaser acknowledgement. Purchaser Purchaser acknowledges that the vaccine and materials related to the vaccine And their components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID 19 pandemic and will continue to be studied after provision of the vaccine to purchaser under this agreement. This is the interesting bit. Purchaser, in this case, the South African government, acknowledged that the long term effects and efficacy of the vaccines are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known. So here, in this contract, they're saying to the South African government quite clearly, The long term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known. So What does efficacy mean? From the dictionary, the ability of something to produce the intended results. Pfizer telling the government here, we don't know. Yet, if I recall, I'll take from our own experience our own government and our own media and superstars and sports stars And influencers and GPs who were on TV, some famous people, famous people with big followings who do interviews on social media, on the television, We're all saying, oh, it's 95% to 100% effective, safe and effective, 100%, 95%. But here On page 21, purchaser acknowledgement, section 5.5, they're saying, we don't know. Why is this important, you're asking? Come on, Mark. Get to the nitty gritty. Okay. Well, here I am. When you go to page 36 of this incredible contract, page 36, What does it say there? At the very top, in witness whereof, The parties hereto have caused this agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first written above. The 1st April 2021, that agreement between Pfizer and the South African government is binding. So let's assume our government You have to assume this. We rolled out the vaccines in the UK on the 8th December 2020. Yet 4 months after, 5 months after the rollout, Pfizer's contract with the South African government He's saying they don't know the efficacy. They don't know the long term effects. So that means our government would have known this information 100%. This is a contract. So our government's lawyers would have read that contract. If it's Similar to or the same as the South African government 1, and I'm taking that at face value right now, means they knew, our government knew, Our lawyers who work for us, for the government, they knew they would have read this contract. And this contract Is 99.99% favorable to Pfizer? They've got no liability, No indemnity against anybody being sued. No third party can sue them. It's all in these different sections in this contract. Page 23, 8.1, total indemnification of Pfizer and BioNTech. Page 25, 9.1, Insurance. They will not cover any third party claims. Page 26, excluding liability, governments knew exactly what they were signing, knew exactly what they were doing. So why did our government sign a contract and an agreement where they knew something had long term effects, but they didn't know what they were, where they knew it wasn't effective. Yet they were going on television every single day, Boris, Witty, Valance, Van Tam, Sajid Javid, they were going on television and saying it was safe and effective, So they blatantly lied to the British people day after day after day. Let's not forget the vaccine minister, Nadia Zahawi. So all these people working for us in government in the civil service knew if the contract was the same, that it wasn't effective. They didn't know if it was safe or not, and they gave it to the British people in the millions. And they spent 1,000,000,000 buying this product from Pfizer. And have Pfizer committed fraud? Because it doesn't prevent It's not preventing it. It would appear to be causing it. So how do we go about rectifying what these people have done, these Heinous and disgusting crimes that our government, our civil service, our media have committed against the people. We've got millions of people injured, 100 of thousands of people dead. Excess deaths are through the roof. As per Andrew Bridgen asking the question of Rishi Sunak in Parliament at PMQs on 31st 24 on Wednesday. And what was Rishi Sunak's reply? Safe. They are safe. Now really interesting, Rishi Sunak didn't say Safe and effective, which has been the mantra that they've been spouting for the last 3 years. So Rishi Sunak, why is why didn't you say effective? Is Is it because you probably looked at the contract and realized, or is it because you're aware of the harm, injury, and death that's being caused? So to all the lawyers out there, the barristers out there, the legal superstars out there, you need to get a copy of this contract, And you need to sue the British government and the civil service and potentially Pfizer because As part of Pfizer's agreement, it says in here that this agreement agreement is nonbinding If fraud has been committed or misrepresentation, I think Pfizer have committed fraud and misrepresentation because it doesn't prevent what they say it was supposed to prevent. But our government knew that. So Regardless of what Pfizer have or haven't done, our government and their lawyers knew this product was not effective, And they didn't know what the long term effects were, yet they're spouting over the television day in, day out in the media 247, indoctrinating the public They're safe and effective. How do they know when Pfizer's telling them it isn't? Metropolitan Police, Are you finally going to do something now? Because we've got evidence. So you need to be getting the contract off our government, don't you, and say, We'd like to see the contract, please. It's our contract. Make it public. Get it down to the police Have a look at it, and then start making the arrest of these people who caused these disgusting crimes against The men, women, and children of the United Kingdom. And I'll suggest people around the world, get your governments to have a look at the contracts that They've signed on your behalf. Does it say the same? Because if it does, you need to be asking some questions. There needs to be accountability. You've murdered, murdered our families, corporate manslaughter, gross negligent manslaughter, misconduct in public office, misfeasance in public office, Manslaughter, fraud, genocide, treason, crimes against humanity, they're all there. And let's not forget terrorism. We were terrorized. Look what they did to the elderly. They injected them to death as well. There's blood on these people's hands. There needs to be accountability. It's time that the people of this country stood up and said, what on earth is going on? There has to be has to be A criminal investigation. Metropolitan Police, do your job. We've had enough. How much more evidence do you need? How much more? I will leave a copy of the link where you can find this contract, and you can look for yourself at the points that I've raised. And don't warn your social media or government if you think that you're going to delete these links. I've got a copy of the contracts And there's also safe copies with 3rd parties. So delete away. If anybody wants one and they can't find it, I've got this here. I'm happy to make it publicly available. The link will be will be supplied on this video for everybody to go and have a look What these so called ministers who work for us have done to us for the last 4 years with the knowledge, the knowledge, they don't work, They're not effective, and they knew from the start. Time for accountability, a criminal investigation and accountability, but most importantly, remedy and redress for the many, many victims Are these disgusting bioweapons they call vaccines? Thank you.
Saved - January 17, 2024 at 3:14 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

"You is the most diverse pilot on record. She is a 3ft, 2 inch transgender pansexual native American man who identifies as a 6ft tall Korean woman" Welcome aboard folks, diversity is our strength. Genius 😂 https://t.co/e6Oi6W6iW2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome aboard! Our pilot is a highly diverse individual, being a 3 foot 2 inch transgender Native American man who identifies as a 6 foot tall Korean woman. We encourage volunteers to assist with the controls, and please buckle up as the flashing lights in the cockpit can trigger her epilepsy. Remember to keep your voices low, as she may need to consult instructional videos during the flight. Let's celebrate the diversity on board!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome aboard, folks. We are very proud to share that your pilot is the most diverse pilot on record. She is a 3 foot 2 inch transgender Native American man who identifies as a 6 foot tall Korean woman. Any volunteers to help reach the controls are welcome. You will want to buckle up as her epilepsy is often triggered by the flashing lights in the cockpit. Remember to keep a whisper at a volume level as she may have to consult instructional videos as a refresher during the flight. Now can we get a big cheer for diversity.
Saved - January 14, 2024 at 10:44 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Fantasy Island is real. https://t.co/YJfXhffQWH

Saved - January 8, 2024 at 3:39 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
In the film "Children of Men," set in 2007, a flu pandemic causes global infertility. The protagonist, wearing a London 2012 Olympic top, helps a pregnant refugee girl reach "The Human Project" to save humanity. The film also explores themes of illegal immigration and societal collapse. Symbolism and visuals hint at planned events. The film's scenes reflect current realities, such as civil war, immigration issues, and a police state. The rainbow on the jumper predates the LGBTQ+ movement. These warnings should not be ignored.

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

What will really blow your mind, is the 2007 film Children of Men, features the hero (Clive Owen) wearing a London 2012 Olympic top. He puts the top on and then secretly listens to a friend explain when the women of his world stopped having babies... ... one year after a flu pandemic. Genetic experiments are even mentioned in the film as a possible cause for the 100% infertility rate. Even better, his purpose, a white man, is to take a black refugee girl who is pregnant, the only child bearing lady on the planet, to 'The Human Project', so that humanity can be saved and repopulated. Illegal immigrants are a dominant theme in the film Predicative programming, these are things that are about to pass, depopulation is real. Do you see it yet?

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Here is the clip, at about 1 min 20 Michael Caine mentions the flu pandemic of 2008. 2008 is one year before babies stop being born in the film's timeline. Notice Owen's top. London 2012. This film is 100% telling you what they planned through visuals, language, and a shit load of symbolism.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses the concept of faith versus chance. The speaker mentions a mythical cosmic battle between the two and questions the significance of faith when life is governed by chance. The speaker also mentions a couple named Julian and Theo who met at a rally and shared a belief in changing the world. However, their faith was challenged when their child Dylan was born by chance. The speaker reflects on the flu pandemic and how it affected Theo's faith. The video concludes with the idea that life makes its own choices, highlighting the unpredictability of existence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is a mythical cosmic battle between faith and chance. Maybe I shouldn't. I you already dead. Hang on. Now come. What do you taste? Strawberries. Strawberries. That's what it's called. Strawberries. Got it. Weakest. So you I'll be sure. Luke, Julian, and Theo. Yeah. There you go. Julian and Theo met among a 1000000 protesters in a rally by chance. But they were there because of what they believed in in the 1st place, their faith. They wanted to change the world and their faith kept them together. But by chance, Dylan was born. Is it him? Yeah. That's It it'd have been about your age. Magical child. Beautiful. Their faith put in praxis. Praxis. What Charts. It was a sweet little dream. Yeah. Little hands, little legs, little a Along came the flu pandemic, and then by chance, it was gone. Oh, Jesus. You see, Theo's faith lost out to chance. So why bother if life's going to make its own choices? Watch Baby's got Theo's eyes. Yeah. It's terrible. But, you know, everything happens. Dad,

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Every scene in this film has information that is true today. USA is in civil war Russia is at war in Eastern Europe Piles of cows burn in every field you see Immigrants are hunted down and put in cages The UK is a police state Suicide is promoted as a normal part of life There are NO children, no one under the age of about 20 years old. It is a gloom dull and depressing film. But the black girl makes it to 'the human project', the white man dies passing her on for the future of humanity. Think about it.

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

There is even a rainbow on the jumper, before rainbow people were really even a thing. The 6 colours of LBTQP123ABC flag. Just an observation. These warnings may be a sign of a paranoid mind, culture, ideology, but I say look around, ignore these warnings at your peril. https://t.co/dCoQj3XRH5

Saved - January 3, 2024 at 11:32 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

United Kingdom had an increase of 9.4% excess deaths in 2023. Canada, New Zealand, Australia were worse. None of the countries on this list had excess deaths during the so called pandemic. This trend will continue into 2024 and beyond. Yet no one bats an eyelid. https://t.co/aQBsL6QMBB

Saved - January 1, 2024 at 11:45 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
A scientist named Dennis Rancourt challenges the validity of COVID, vaccines, and climate change, claiming to have conducted thorough research. He believes that climate change is a scam, denies the existence of a pandemic, and considers mRNA vaccines to be extremely dangerous. He warns that these issues may potentially cause the deaths of millions of people. Rancourt believes that the truth will soon be revealed to the public, despite efforts by the establishment to hide it. The author encourages others to share this information widely in hopes of raising awareness in 2024.

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

"I am a scientist..." Dennis Rancourt demolishes COVID, vaccines, and climate change, he's done his research like a proper scientist should. Climate Change is a scam, there was no pandemic, and mRNA vaccines are the most dangerous medical product ever forced upon the public. Potentially killing millions of people, likely many millions more. The floodgates are buckling, the truth about what has been done cannot be hidden from the remaining unsuspecting public much longer. And the establishment will unleash hell in order to prevent them from finding out. Enjoy the talk, and share as widely as possible, make 2024 the year when everyone finally wakes up.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am a scientist with expertise in various fields, and I have extensively analyzed data related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on my research, I can confidently say that there was no pandemic and no particularly virulent pathogen causing death. Mortality rates did not cross borders, and there was no evidence of a spreading virus. Additionally, I have studied global warming and concluded that it is not occurring. Furthermore, my research on vaccines has shown that they are toxic and associated with an increase in all-cause mortality, particularly among the elderly. We have analyzed data from over 100 countries and found a clear correlation between vaccine rollout and increased mortality. Our work will continue to challenge the establishment and expose the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah, I'm a scientist. I have spent decades learning science and math, statistics, everything from quantum mechanics all the way to environmental science, biogeochemistry, I'm interdisciplinary. I was a tenured full professor at the University of Ottawa, and I always spoke my mind, and that got me fired. This was before COVID, so I knew what it was like to fight the establishment. And when I heard the COVID propaganda, I knew immediately that it was intense propaganda and that it couldn't possibly be true because they were yelling that we were all going to die, and I couldn't see any dead bodies out in the street. And I did. I went out in the street and I looked around, I couldn't see any dead people no matter what they said. And as a scientist, what I decided to do was to look at all cause mortality data. So our nations collect very good data about the number of deaths. That's something you cannot be biased about. The person either died or they didn't. You know that they died. You know their age. You know where they died, and you collect that data. Countries collect very good data about deaths and births. So that is unbiased, hard data. We can analyze the number of deaths as a function of time by age group, by sex and by region, by jurisdiction, by province, state down to municipalities and so on. And that is the data that I've been using since the very beginning of this so called pandemic. And my research group, we were the 1st to say back in an article that was published in June of 2020 that when we look at all cause mortality data, there is no pandemic. There was a peak of deaths at the beginning in certain hot spots that was directly due to how people were treated in hospitals and care homes. It was Quantitatively due to that, there is no so I can tell you after 3 years of intense study that we are continuing, I can tell you the following thing. And this is hard scientific conclusions from looking at the data. There was no pandemic. There was no particularly virulent pathogen whatsoever. There's no evidence for it. There is nothing that is spreading that causes death. The mortality doesn't cross borders. The virus has a passport. It refuses to cross borders. You can make a map of Europe. You can see countries where there's absolutely no excess all cause mortality, right beside hotspots where there's intense all cause mortality. So those are firm conclusions from our I have written more than 30 scientific reports about all cause mortality and COVID related science. And I can tell you these things with certainty. So when Eva says there's no global warming, I also study global warming. I did the calculations, the radiation transfer. I can tell you Eva is right. As a scientist, I can tell you there's no global warming, there was no pandemic, nothing is spreading, nitrogen is not a problem. Cow farts are not a problem. I can tell you these things with certainty. I'm not joking. I'm a scientist. The article about, radiation transfer and so called global warming that I wrote in 2010, parts of it were read in the U. S. Senate. It was very impactful. Fall. Scientists have said this is rigorous. This is hard. What we showed what I showed in that calculation was you can double the amount of CO2, and it will not have a noticeable effect on the earth's mean surface temperature, period. That's a hard calculation. So I've been doing this for many years. Every time there is a problem in society where science can be of some help, I get right in there, and I do it. And so we have done this for COVID. We were the 1st to establish the points that I just told you about, and then we moved on to the vaccines. And what we found was that the vaccines are a toxic substance. They should be interpreted and thought of as a toxic substance that they inject into your arm, the best way to understand the effect of the vaccine is to study toxicology. So we showed that as soon as a booster is rolled out to a particular age group, very rapidly within weeks, immediately there follows a peak in all cause mortality. And we see this repeatedly in country after country. We have studied more than 100 countries now, And the vaccines are clearly temporally associated with, peaks in all cause mortality. And we're able to calculate the toxicity of that vaccine, and we find that the risk of dying per injection increases with age and it increases exponentially with age, and your risk of dying per injection doubles every 4 or 5 years of age. We were the 1st to demonstrate that. We have demonstrated it repeatedly for many countries, Australia, Israel, Peru, many, many countries. And so in this study, one of the things we found, and this should convince anybody, the following thing. We can quantify excess mortality, whether or not there's mortality beyond the historic trend as a function of time. And what we find is that in more than half of the countries around the world, there is absolutely no excess mortality in the entire period from the time the pandemic was declared in March of 2020 all the way to until mortality starts to increase when the vaccines are rolled out. In more than half the countries in the world, there is no excess mortality until the vaccines are rolled out, and then there is a significant shift to a domain of higher mortality. And this is clear in the data itself. And the countries that do have excess mortality before you roll out the vaccines, it can be directly associated to what how people were being assaulted. And there are many ways in different jurisdictions that people were assaulted. Some of the assaults were very vicious. Like in Peru, they actually called in 10,000 military reservists to go and test people in their homes, in the villages, everywhere and pull them out and isolate them if they tested positive, they actually had a huge peak of mortality related to that policy. So when you assault people by refusing to treat them, in the U. S, they refuse to treat, poor people for bacterial pneumonia by not prescribing antibiotics. This was a huge problem, a big killer in the U. S, and it created a peak of all cause mortality in the summer, which is unheard of. Normally, mortality is lower in the summer. So we just kept seeing these features, and we kept explaining them quantitatively in terms of how populations were assaulted. So this was a mega Campaign, obviously, you know it was planned by the CIA, the military. It was executed. They were going to do it no matter what, and it killed people by how they treated people, and then the vaccines themselves are toxic. So the experiment's been done globally. We know this now. We know that death, increases exponentially with age. Many elderly people died. It's hard to complain because they were elderly, but still they died. So just to give you one quantitative figure to leave you with, In most countries, people over 80, the, chance, the risk of dying per injection is 1 death in between 5 20 injections depending on the country. That's the level of toxicity of the vaccine for elderly people. And this is not to mention all the serious harms that are done to young people and young adults, including myocarditis, heart conditions, you name it. So this has been the nature of our scientific work. We're continuing this full time. We'll be publishing papers in the coming months that are even more revolutionary, I would say. And so we're not going to stop, and we're embarrassing the establishment scientists who are not doing this work and who are lying through their teeth and who are part of the propaganda industry. That's our job.
Saved - December 20, 2023 at 2:33 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Evil walks amongst us. Who is the real Bill Gates? https://t.co/PBdGb4Rcx2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Gates, the chairman of Microsoft, is known for his success in the tech industry. However, there are some controversies surrounding his career. He bought an existing operating system and took credit for its invention. He also attempted to cheat his co-founder out of his share of the company. Gates faced legal issues when the United States Department of Justice sued Microsoft for antitrust violations. To improve his public image, Gates established the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and became a prominent philanthropist. However, the foundation has faced criticism for its investments in companies accused of unethical practices. Gates has also been involved in various controversial initiatives, including global warming experiments and global surveillance projects. Additionally, his connection to Jeffrey Epstein raised questions about their relationship and business dealings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: According to legend, young Bill Gates built his computer empire out of his garage. Reality tells another story, that Bill Gates was born into wealth and privilege. Both his grandfather and great grandfather were banking muggles. His father, William Gates, Sr, was a prominent Seattle based lawyer and political lobbyist. Through his father, Bill Gates learned the ins and outs of law and politics and how to manipulate those governing forces. Speaker 1: I'm Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft. Speaker 0: Bill Gates dropped out of college to start Microsoft. He is credited with inventing the operating system that became Windows. However, he played no part in the invention of Windows. The fact is, he bought an existing operating system from Seattle Computer Products, had it modified then licensed it to IBM. That didn't stop him from taking all the credit. Speaker 2: I don't see Bill Gates Says this great creative person, I see him as an opportunist. Speaker 0: While Microsoft's cofounder Paul Allen was struggling with cancer, Bill Gates Seize the opportunity by attempting to cheat him out of his share of the company's fortune. Speaker 3: They're basically talking about how they were planning to dilute my share down to almost nothing. And it was, you know, really a shocking and disheartening moment for me. Speaker 4: And you were sick? Speaker 3: Well, I think I was still probably in the middle of radiation therapy. Speaker 0: Gates's business strategies came under fire in 1998 when the United States Department of Justice sued Microsoft for antitrust violations. Speaker 5: This is day 3 of the videotape deposition of Bill Gates on September. Speaker 0: During the 18 month trial, Gates gave hours of videotaped testimony. Speaker 6: What were the non Microsoft browsers that you were concerned about in January of 1996. That month. Speaker 5: Yes. Sorry. Speaker 6: And what about it? What non Microsoft browsers Were you concerned about in January of 1996? Speaker 1: I don't know. You mean concerned. Speaker 6: What is it about the word concerned that you don't understand? Speaker 1: I'm not sure what you mean by it. Speaker 7: The justice department has charged Microsoft with engaging in anticompetitive and exclusionary practices designed to maintain its monopoly in personal computer operating systems. Speaker 0: In a move to overshadow the negative press, Gates invested $100,000,000 to set up the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Overnight, Bill Gates transformed his public image from ruthless tech monopolizer to the world's most generous philanthropist. Speaker 1: I'm pleased to announce That we're pledging an additional $1,000,000,000, to Speaker 5: We had the chance to witness Bill Gates 2 point o, The man you don't know. Speaker 0: The rebranding campaign paid off. His net worth swiftly doubled, earning Bill Gates the title of Richest man in the world. Speaker 8: You've invested $10,000,000,000 in vaccinations over the last 2 decades, and you figured out the return on investment for that. It kind of stunned me. Can you walk us through the math? Speaker 0: In a Wall Street essay, Bill Gates declared vaccines the best investment I've ever made. Speaker 1: There's been over a 20 to 1 return. So if you just looked at the Economic benefits. That's a pretty strong number compared to anything else. Speaker 0: The Gates Foundation expanded rapidly Into a massive, vertically integrated, multinational corporation controlling every step in a supply chain that reaches from Seattle based boardrooms to the villages of Africa and Asia. Speaker 9: Is the world's largest private philanthropy causing harm? The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has made 1,000,000 of dollars each year from companies blamed for many of the same social and health problems the foundation seeks to address. The Gates Foundation has investments in 69 of the worst polluting companies in the US and Canada. Other companies in the foundation's portfolio have been accused of transgressions, including forcing thousands of people to lose their homes, supporting child labor, defrauding, and neglecting patients in need of medical care. The Gates Foundation has now provided details. Speaker 5: William h Gates the third and Melinda French Gates. Speaker 0: As a top donor to both the WHO and the CDC, no one man has more power than Bill Gates to influence and control the health and medical freedom of all people. Speaker 1: Normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population. This will be the new normal Until a vaccine is developed. Speaker 5: Until we find a vaccine, going back to normal means putting lives at risk. Speaker 4: We need to produce it And to deploy it in every single corner of the world. Speaker 10: Full vaccination of our children and pregnant women. Speaker 0: Development All new vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics, Speaker 11: and more infectious vaccines and therapeutics are developed. Speaker 7: We've already bought the syringes. We already know where it's gonna Happen. We're thinking about what that's going to be. It's all part of this plan. Speaker 12: Our military is now being mobilized. So at the end of the year, we're gonna be able to give it to a lot of people very, very rapidly. Speaker 0: In 1986, president Ronald Reagan signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, granting total immunity to vaccine manufacturers. After a decade of lawsuits related to vaccine injuries and deaths, Vaccine makers were going bankrupt. In a move to coerce policymakers, vaccine companies threatened to stop making vaccines until they could be legally shielded from liability. To this day, when someone is injured or killed as the result of an adverse reaction, It is the US taxpayers that pay for the damages. Speaker 13: Welcome back. Were several Indian tribal girls used as guinea pigs? The report alleges that 2 American pharma giants' untested vaccine was administered to Thousands of tribal girls without proper study and paperwork. Speaker 0: India was among the hardest hit after Bollywood celebrities were incentivized by the Gates Foundation to urge the public to submit to mass vaccinations. In 2009, tribal children were administered the HPV vaccine. Over 24,000 girls were told they were being given wellness shots, in many cases, without the informed consent of a parent or a guardian. Speaker 14: The people that were administering these vaccines lied to the Guardians of these girls and told the girls, oh, this is gonna cure cancer. You're never gonna have cancer. And these girls became severely injured. Some of them developed Seizures, some of them developed cancer, and 7 girls died. And there was no insurance. There was no assistance for them. And the Gates Foundation denied that it had been clinical trials. And it was so bad that the parliament in India created a task course they studied it, and they kicked out the Gates Foundation. Speaker 10: But India is a barbaric country. Things happen here in a very barbaric way, But I was surprised to find an American organization operating in broad daylight, doing things in a very, very, Let's say Indian fashion. And so the route I took was that I want the whole procedure to be investigated. The Indian parliament formed a committee, and it was to be a rather surprising move because you generally don't often have Such a high level inquiry into matters affecting poor people, and that was such an extraordinary report. I don't think Indian parliament has ever come out with such a scathing report. And the government officials came up and said we shouldn't have authorized this. We're sorry. We're not going to allow them again. And now they are back Doing the same old tricks again. Speaker 15: The good news is that human clinical trials can start as early as July 2020 for India's 1st COVID 19 indigenous vaccine that's been developed by Bharat Vitek. Speaker 10: So you can imagine how the manipulation of the media by the media, The manipulation of public opinion by leaders of all political parties unanimously say, we want a vaccine. And the worst thing is they are taken as philanthropists. Whereas what this actually is is the acquisition of political and financial power. And I think the 2nd most populous country with 1,300,000,000 people is going to be a good base for pharmaceutical companies to make a killing and also kill a lot of people in the process. Yes. I just find it a pity that we haven't been able to get any benefit for the girls who suffered. You know? It's so terrifying as to what they're actually doing with the world. Speaker 1: We're taking things that are, you know, genetically modified organisms, and we're injecting them in little kids' arms. We just Sewed him right into the vein. Speaker 0: A 2018 scientific study released in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health concluded that Over 490,000 children in India developed paralysis as a result of the gate supported oral polio vaccine that was administered between the years of 20,021,017. Using all the usual slight of hand, US based media and fact checkers rushed to bury the story. But thanks to the meticulous work of a team of Indian researchers and doctors, The inconvenient truth lives on the nih.gov website. Speaker 1: It's my honor to introduce Speaker 10: Bill and Melinda Gates. Speaker 0: Without any medical training, Bill and Melinda Gates founded the Global Alliance For Vaccines and Immunization through which they fulfill their agenda to vaccinate the world. The foundation has been sued by the governments of some of the poorest and most vulnerable nations for causing serious harm through experimental vaccine programs. Speaker 4: If you just look at health care workers around the world, they deserve to get the vaccine first. You know, here in the United States, really, it's going to be black people who really should get it first and many indigenous people. Speaker 16: Vaccines were always Taught to us that it was safe. It was it was healthy. These are things that we had to do. But given the position that I am in now as a state legislator In looking at these studies and reviewing a lot of these studies, it's very scary, and I want the African American community to open up their eyes. Speaker 17: Of all the places that mister Gates could have gone in the world, why did he settle on Africa? It's not because he cares about people that look like me. He cares about an agenda. Speaker 11: African bodies have been used as lab rats for many years for big pharma. They are using us for trials. They are using us for testing. But as an African, I say no more. Speaker 16: Africans, they're tired of becoming the guinea pigs of the world. Their antennas are raised, and they are telling each other all over social media. They're on high alert right now. Speaker 18: There is a policy of the American government. It's called the Kissinger report, which was produced in the mid seventies. And it explicitly states that, the purpose of the foreign policy in Africa was to, reduce the the population Because they have a great mineral resources there. At the time, Kissinger and those involved with the Carter administration Wanted to shrink the population, make sure that the Africans do not develop and do not use the resources for themselves because we in the states, we need them. There's a a concerted effort of foreign powers to control the population of Africa. Speaker 19: Some children did survive the botched vaccinations last month and will recover, but fifteen, all under the age of 5 died from fever, vomiting, and diarrhea. Speaker 18: Human errors Contributed to the unfortunate deaths of the children. Speaker 20: How can you believe big pharma, but not believe These parents, when they tell you that their children have been injured by big pharma, I don't care how big this corporate machine looks. As a parent, I can tell you these people will never stop fighting for their kids. Speaker 0: Hours to list all of the questionable initiatives that Bill Gates is involved in. Here's a few of the highlights. Gates is one of the key funders in the Stratosphere Controlled Perturbation Experiment designed to block out the sun in an effort to control global warming by releasing massive amounts of calcium carbonate and other materials into the upper atmosphere. Critics, including environmental scientists, have called the project a global genocide experiment. Gates has invested over $1,000,000,000 in Earth Now's global surveillance project. The project will launch hundreds of Utilights into space which will allow for the 20 four seven monitoring of all people everywhere. In partnership with MIT, Bill Gates has It's developed a new technology that allows vaccines to be injected under your skin along with your medical records. The quantum dot Tattoo will implant an invisible certificate that can be scanned by authorities using a cell phone app and infrared light. Speaker 1: Eventually, what will have to have is certificates of who's a recovered person, who's a vaccinated person. So eventually, there will be this digital Immunity. Proof. Speaker 0: The EPA recently approved an experimental use permit to Oxitec, A biotech company funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. In an effort to fight malaria, Oxitec will soon release millions of genetically modified in various US states. According to the NIH website, programs are being developed to allow human immunization via mosquito bite. It was Science Magazine that coined the phrase flying syringes. Speaker 11: Would you raise your Ma'am, please, do you solemnly swear to testimony you're about to give, and the matter now pending? Speaker 21: A shocking new report from The Speaker 11: New York Times sheds light on the connection between Microsoft founder Bill Gates And the late Jeffrey Epstein, you report these 2 men met at least 6 times. Speaker 10: Well, I Speaker 5: believe that there were more. This included visits to the mansion, seeing each other in Seattle, flying on Epstein's plane. Speaker 0: When flight logs revealed that Gates had been a passenger on the Lolita Express, he claimed that he didn't know that the private jet belonged to Epstein. He also denied that he and mister Epstein were involved in any business deals. However, an expose by the New Times revealed that not only did Bill Gates initiate a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein well after he was convicted of sex crimes, but the 2 were also involved in the process of cofounding a multibillion dollar charitable fund. Speaker 11: Why would they ever set up a charitable trust Benefiting Jeffrey Epstein. Speaker 5: That it was all about philanthropy, that Bill Gates just wanted to find new sources of money. Speaker 0: Why would one of the richest men in the world choose to partner with the world's most notorious pedophile? A deeper dive into Epstein's world revealed that the 2 men had more in common than meets the eye. Like Gates, Epstein was a billionaire philanthropist with a passion for science, health, education, and children. The Jeffrey Epstein Foundation donated 1,000,000 of dollars to top universities, science institutes, medical schools, early education programs, youth initiatives, an international peace accords. Bill Gates is either the most misunderstood man alive or one of the most convincing con men to ever live. Is he a benevolent hero Or a malevolent opportunist. Speaker 7: Bill Gates. Speaker 0: Personally, I would love to believe that one of the richest men in the world He's given away his fortune for the betterment of humanity. I wanna believe that endearing smile. I wanna believe that his heart is as soft and warm as his sweaters. At the very least, I wanna believe that he's unaware of the damage
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 10:02 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Covid vaccines & operation warp speed was cut from the live feed of the latest republican debate. This is what was blacked out from the American public. If msm & their big pharma pay masters didn't want you to see it, then it's probably worth sharing. https://t.co/oiSEi5MNwZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the development of the COVID vaccine through Operation Warp Speed and the issue of vaccine liability. The program protected drug companies from lawsuits over vaccine injuries, which critics argue creates a bureaucratic compensation system. The speaker believes that the special lobbying protection for vaccine manufacturers should be repealed, as it prevents accountability for those harmed by vaccines. They also emphasize the importance of free speech during emergencies and advocate for a separation between capitalism and democracy to end crony capitalism. The speaker calls for an end to government officials joining the boards of companies they previously dealt with and highlights the need to address corruption in government. The video ends with a statement about Alabama and a final question about the vaccine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Market place begins. That's crony capitalism, and that's the answer. Speaker 1: Okay. Through Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration and private industry developed a COVID vaccine in record time. Vaccine. The Trump administration and private industry developed a COVID vaccine in record time. Vaccine. The program protected the drug companies from virtually all lawsuits over vaccine injuries. The government has a program to compensate for such harm, but critics say it is a black hole of bureaucracy. 12,000 claims filed, 10% decided, only 8 payouts so far in a forum with no right to counsel, no hearings, no appeals. Mister Trump says he's very proud of warp speed. Should he be? Speaker 0: Vaccine. Well, this question specifically on liability goes back to actually Reagan. And Reagan is a president who I admire. Many of us do. I think that vaccine. Reviving that spirit is in many ways gonna be good for this country in so many ways, but one of the areas where he erred was this special form of lobbying to say that one kind of manufacturer, vaccine. A vaccine manufacturer cannot be sued for their product liability. So I have pledged it is part of my legislative agenda. We will repeal that, vaccine. Just like we will repeal every other form of crony capitalism, people who have been harmed by those vaccines deserve accountability. They cannot be forgotten Americans. And I think one of the top lessons we learned from that COVID pandemic is that free speech in this country is most important in those alleged times of emergency. If we had been allowed to openly debate the merits of those vaccines, they would have been never mandated in the way that they were. And in general, I don't think that we should want capitalism and democracy to share the same bed anymore. It's time for a clean divorce. Let companies be companies, but I don't like the crony capitalism. Vaccine. This dates back a long time in both parties, and I think that we need to end the lobbying. And I personally believe that if you have been working in the government, you should not lobby that government for 10 years. Vaccine. If you have been a government elected official doing deals with companies, be they Boeing or be they pharmaceutical companies, you should not join the board of that company for 10 years after. Vaccine. The former chairman of the FDA, the leader commissioner of the FDA ended up on the board of Pfizer. Nikki Haley did deals with Boeing, ends up on the board of Boeing. I don't care if it's a Republican or a Democrat. Vaccine. We need some basic principles that end the corruption in government. That's how we got the health insurance exemptions. That's how we got Pharmaceutical product liability exemption to end the corruption. We need vaccine. Speaker 2: Alabama. Final question before vaccine. Statements, and we wanna get you all in. So we're gonna give you 45 seconds for this last one. Governor Christie, we're gonna start with you. Vaccine.
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 4:58 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

The New Zealand vaccine database whistle-blower on vaccine deaths, injuries, payments, and political exemptions, talks to Liz Gunn. 'people were dying as soon as the were vaccinated' This is MASSIVE. Please repost. https://t.co/QJgY6dEycI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their involvement in building a vaccine payment system in New Zealand. They noticed discrepancies in the data, specifically a high number of deaths occurring shortly after vaccination. They provide charts showing the top ten batches with high mortality rates and mention a website called "Find My Batch" where people can find information about their specific batch. The speaker also highlights the high mortality rates among certain vaccinators. They mention various spikes in deaths over the years, including the COVID-19 pandemic, but note that the death rate has continued to increase even after COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Well, I was involved with building a project, helped with, implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It's called, a pay per dose system. So it means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get They get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it. I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates, of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated. Speaker 1: So what did you notice when you first started to look At this data as you were building it? Speaker 0: Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that, people would die almost straight away after being injected. So That sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper. And I am a scientist by nature. I I love science. It's My all time favorite. I've got a I've got a master's degree in science. Oh, no but no one knows this data. Nobody but me in New Zealand has seen this data. Now I'm giving it to the world. Speaker 1: Explain why. Explain that. Speaker 0: Because it's a it's a payment system, and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with 1 database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good IT, I was able to manage and build the system and as be the only database administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, you'd need a whole team of people. So it'd be very difficult for 1 person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of the size and because it's got really good IT, I happen to be the the one. Speaker 1: A lot of people want to know what was my batch? What can you do to help keep us with that? Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top Ten, batches that were had a high death count, a high mortality rate. And I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID, which is our internal number for a batch, but You can easily get the Pfizer batch ID from that. It shouldn't be too difficult. Speaker 1: Tell us more about that because a lot of people will say, hey, that's only the top Tien, I want to know my batch. What would you advise? Speaker 0: Yep. You can do that. There's, there's a website, find my batch for the whole world that can actually find that. And I we can list this on, a website, the whole number of batches. There are 119 individual batches Just so far, New Zealand, a 119 Speaker 1: Of the Pfizer? Speaker 0: Of the Pfizer. Actually, not of all of them because we have We have Moderna. We have AstraZeneca. We've but they're only few and far between. Mostly, it's Pfizer. Mostly, it's Pfizer in New Zealand. Speaker 1: So people can find that? Yep. Find my batch? Speaker 0: Yes. They should be able to. Speaker 1: Yes. Hello? Speaker 0: So what I did was our internal batch ID, I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio. Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 0: Yes, they are. Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% Speaker 0: death There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was, are the vaccinators themselves, what are they doing? Are we looking at some who I've got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators Who have the highest ratios of mortality? Speaker 1: For privacy reasons, We have redacted the names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. Speaker 0: We have to. Speaker 1: We have. Yeah. So we've just called it Vaccinator 1? Speaker 0: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one This vaccine added 246 people, and 60 of them are no longer with us. Speaker 1: That is nearly 25%. One in 4. Speaker 0: Nearly 1 in 4 that that person's vaccinated is dying dead. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, But this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, But we point 7. Speaker 1: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. Yeah. So it looks then we start to say, what is it they were putting into people's bodies? Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 by vaccinated, the 3rd highest Vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 0: Yes. And unless they they go around, terribly ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, Then there is no other explanation for this then, and why would they give them that anyway? You know? It doesn't make any sense. The vaccine is meant to Protect those people. On the left there, the big red line, is the Christchurch earthquake event. So that is the outlier, and that's A lot of people died on that day. From there, the next line where you get more than a 120 people dying is sometime 2012. Then you get nothing for a year. 2013 doesn't have any. 2014, you got a couple. Then nothing. 2016, you got 1. Then nothing until 2018 where you get A whole bunch of whole cluster, that's probably due to a flu epidemic because always these spikes that you see, these black lines previously on the left hand side, They're all due to the winter flu season, so you gotta remember that. They all all these deaths happened June, July, August. So there in 2018, we had a a big flu epidemic. Moving on to the right, we got another one. Then The next red one, the Christchurch massacre, which was in 2019 in March. But from that, you get a a cluster in 2020, a whole bunch there. May have been another bad flu season. We don't know. But then from 2021, you see A black line there appearing, and then it's like a flick of a switch. Suddenly, the black lines get closer together, And there's more of them. Very thick black lines there. So this this one here, Peak deaths was COVID with or from COVID, but then the deaths from COVID, if you look at the Worldometer website, it correlates to that. That was the same time, and they said that over 60 people died with or from COVID. Then after that, it suddenly suddenly drops off. So after that, you only get a couple of people a day dying with or from COVID. So if you if you go back to The chart there, in that case, you would you would expect to see the black lines disappear because no one's dying from COVID anymore. Right? But you're not. Yeah. Absolutely not. You're seeing the black lines. There are more people dying than ever before. These are the biggest number of deaths we've seen in history of New Zealand. The death rate has gone up 6%, 8% year on year. Even after COVID wasn't a thing. The death rate is still going up. And that's illustrated here by these black lines which are still going on.
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 2:03 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Dr. Mike Yeadon's address to the Members of UK Parliament 4th December 2023. "I am going to tell that the design of the so called vaccines was to intentionally harm people" There was no pandemic. https://t.co/Xhnz0liy1E

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Mike Eden, a former vice president at Pfizer, claims that the design of the COVID-19 vaccines was intentionally harmful. He argues that there was no pandemic and that the PCR test was fraudulent. He believes that the vaccines contain toxic materials, such as spike proteins, which can cause the immune system to attack the body's cells. Additionally, he states that the vaccines use lipid nanoparticles that can deposit in the ovaries and cause autoimmune attacks on various organs. Dr. Eden asserts that millions of people have died as a result of these vaccines and warns that more injections are coming. He urges individuals to take action to stop this alleged crime.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. My name is doctor Mike Eden. Probably know by now that I'm a career research scientist, biologist. I've worked in the biopharmaceutical industry for over 30 years. Famously, a former vice president at Pfizer. I left in 2011 as vice president and worldwide head of research. I was responsible for everything from idea to clinical proof of concept. In the 10 years after leaving Pfizer, I've worked as an independent. I consulted to 30 biotech companies. I also founded, led, And sold my own biotech, Zianco. And we were written up in a 2017 article in Forbes Magazine. I think it was, converting Pfizer discounts into gold, and it was written by a former Pfizer board member. So 3 years before this alleged event started, I was very well regarded in the industry. I'm going to tell you that the design of the so called vaccines was intentionally to harm people, And I'm going to give you several examples of that based on my extensive industry experience of rational Drug design. Not a single atom or molecule in a synthetic drug is in there by luck. It's in there because people chose it to be in there, And they intended certain things to flow from their choices. But just very briefly, you should know, I hope, There has not been a pandemic. Dennis Rancourt's data shows that the all cause mortality Evident data did not increase at all in the run up to the declaration fraudulently by WHO pandemic. There is no public health emergency except that created by our governments. A inappropriate fraudulent PCR test was used To give people the impression that they had a particular disease where they didn't, they were all the normal diseases. And then what happened was In 3 different ways, people were treated badly through changed medical procedures that were imposed above the level of nation, briefly Mass ventilation of people inappropriately in hospitals that led to lots of deaths. In care homes, Many people were given sedatives and respiratory depressants which led to their deaths. My PhD was specifically in that area of opiates and respiratory depression. And in the community, people were denied lifesaving antibiotics, and died of bacterial pneumonia. There's your pandemic. There is no other pandemic. And based on this lie, we were told that vaccines were coming our way and would be our saviour. Two things. As I say, first, there's no pandemic so you certainly don't need an experimental or rushed medical intervention. Secondly, even if you did, as someone who's worked in the industry for over 30 years, I am telling you, it's absolutely impossible To invent, test, clinically evaluate, and manufacture, and then launch on global scale a complex Biomedical products. It's absolutely impossible. It's not as close. It's years' wrong. The fastest record price of this was 6 years, And friends of mine who worked all their lives in manufacturing of complex biological products tell me the methods development Alone for the development of a reproducible manufacturing process itself takes a number of years. So whatever it is You think we're done. I am telling you that was not the development of a proper medical product. What I think happened was, the advancements of materials that are intentionally Toxic, and then it was sketchy advanced and jammed into people's arms, often coerced, sometimes even mandated, With the unsurprising effect that millions of people have died, I don't have time today to explain What I think they're gonna do in the future, but suffice to say, more injections are coming if we don't stop this. So Like I said, I'm skilled in the arts of rational drug discovery. So why am I saying these materials are intentionally toxic? Let me give you the first example. How do you think your body plays nice with itself but when it's infected or detects a cancer it goes to war? And the answer is it distinguishes self, things that are meant to be inside you from non self, on foreign things so they're not meant to be inside you. And it is trained exquisitely to detect and attack non self foreign things. If you inject a person with a gene that encodes a foreign piece of protein, like a spike protein, from a foreign organism, Your body will detect that. And every single cell that takes up that material And expresses foreign protein will be attacked and killed by your immune system. Now if you think that's advanced immunology, Let me put you right. It's in the 1st chapter. Distinguishing self from nonself is one of the firm, foremost essence of immunology and every single person involved in in the train of delivery of these materials So doctors' hands knew what I've just told you, they will inevitably cause injury. Then on top of that, It's not just bad enough that you're making a foreign protein. You're making a specific material called spike protein. Those materials are biologically active. That is, if you add them to human blood, for example, They start to coagulate. It clots. Those materials are biological toxins. So now you've got a genetic sequence that forms foreign proteins that means your body attacks and kills every cell that does it. And if you should release any of that protein in your blood, it will form blood clots. If it releases it near nerves, for example, you will get 1 or other of several neurological defects. And, of course, it's not just nerves or blood. There's a third major factor and there are many others but let me give you the third one. These materials are formulated. It's normal to formulate drugs. These are formulated in fatty globules called lipid Nanoparticles. What they do is disguise the foreign genetic information so your body doesn't see it initially until it gets inside your cells and it goes all round your body. It will glide through the cell wall as if it wasn't there. And that was the entire point of it. So that means these materials don't just go to your lymph nodes and they certainly don't stay in your arm where they're injected. They go all around the body including into your brain and your blood and every organ in your body. But here's the thing. 10 years ago, there were papers published, and it was well established and well known in the industry that lipid nanoparticles, lipid nanocarriers, Deposit their cargo preferentially in the ovaries. And that was confirmed with the Pfizer products in an analog experiment performed with the Japanese regulators. So, by design, These agents cause an autoimmune attack on every tissue. They make your body form a well understood Biological toxin that can damage multiple organs in your body. And they deposited their cargos preferentially in the reproductive tissues of women and girls. So if you think that by luck, then you're mistaken. There is no doubt in my mind that anyone of my caliber, and this is my peers that worked on this, absolutely understood What they were designing and manufacturing. So I think having having heard what I've just said, there was no pandemic, And the lie was maintained in order to inject people en masse, I think, 5 a half 1000000000 people with an intentionally dangerous substance, 17,000,000 of whom have died so far. What do you think is happening, and what do you think Your role as an individual is in stopping this crime. Thank you for listening.
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 4:56 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Jets bound for COP28 Climate Change Conference have frozen in Munich, Germany. Priceless 😂 https://t.co/bGb2hLViB5

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 10:27 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

A comment received from a follower and friend this morning. People don't believe in the Kalergi plan. 99% of people have never heard of it. The Kalergi Plan is real, it is happening, and time is running out before UK population hits point of no return. https://t.co/W3oKUinRV7

Saved - December 1, 2023 at 12:39 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

The New Zealand vaccine database whistle-blower on vaccine deaths, injuries, payments, and political exemptions, talks to Liz Gunn. 'people were dying as soon as the were vaccinated' This is MASSIVE. Please repost. https://t.co/QJgY6dEycI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their involvement in building a vaccine payment system in New Zealand. They noticed discrepancies in the data, specifically a high number of deaths occurring shortly after vaccination. They provide charts showing the top ten batches with high mortality rates and mention a website called "Find My Batch" where people can find information about their specific batch. The speaker also highlights the high mortality rates among certain vaccinators. They question the reasons behind these deaths and express concern about the vaccine's effectiveness. They mention spikes in deaths during flu seasons and the COVID-19 pandemic, but note that the death rate in New Zealand has continued to increase even after COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Well, I was involved with building a project, helped with, implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It's called, a pay per dose system. So it means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get They get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it. I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates, of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated. Speaker 1: So what did you notice when you first started to look At this data as you were building it? Speaker 0: Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that, people would die almost straight away after being injected. So That sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper. And I am a scientist by nature. I I love science. It's My all time favorite. I've got a I've got a master's degree in science. Oh, no but no one knows this data. Nobody but me in New Zealand has seen this data. Now I'm giving it to the world. Speaker 1: Explain why. Explain that. Speaker 0: Because it's a it's a payment system, and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with 1 database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good IT, I was able to manage and build the system and as be the only database administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, you'd need a whole team of people. So it'd be very difficult for 1 person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of the size and because it's got really good IT, I happen to be the the one. Speaker 1: A lot of people want to know what was my batch? What can you do to help keep us with that? Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top Ten, batches that were had a high death count, a high mortality rate. And I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID, which is our internal number for a batch, but You can easily get the Pfizer batch ID from that. It shouldn't be too difficult. Speaker 1: Tell us more about that because a lot of people will say, hey, that's only the top Tien, I want to know my batch. What would you advise? Speaker 0: Yep. You can do that. There's, there's a website, find my batch for the whole world that can actually find that. And I we can list this on, a website, the whole number of batches. There are 119 individual batches Just so far, New Zealand, a 119 Speaker 1: Of the Pfizer? Speaker 0: Of the Pfizer. Actually, not of all of them because we have We have Moderna. We have AstraZeneca. We've but they're only few and far between. Mostly, it's Pfizer. Mostly, it's Pfizer in New Zealand. Speaker 1: So people can find that? Yep. Find my batch? Speaker 0: Yes. They should be able to. Speaker 1: Yes. Hello? Speaker 0: So what I did was our internal batch ID, I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio. Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 0: Yes, they are. Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% Speaker 0: death There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was, are the vaccinators themselves, what are they doing? Are we looking at some who I've got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators Who have the highest ratios of mortality? Speaker 1: For privacy reasons, We have redacted the names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. Speaker 0: We have to. Speaker 1: We have. Yeah. So we've just called it Vaccinator 1? Speaker 0: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one This vaccine added 246 people, and 60 of them are no longer with us. Speaker 1: That is nearly 25%. One in 4. Speaker 0: Nearly 1 in 4 that that person's vaccinated is dying dead. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, But this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, But we point 7. Speaker 1: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. Yeah. So it looks then we start to say, what is it they were putting into people's bodies? Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 by vaccinated, the 3rd highest Vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 0: Yes. And unless they they go around, terribly ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, Then there is no other explanation for this then, and why would they give them that anyway? You know? It doesn't make any sense. The vaccine is meant to Protect those people. On the left there, the big red line, is the Christchurch earthquake event. So that is the outlier, and that's A lot of people died on that day. From there, the next line where you get more than a 120 people dying is sometime 2012. Then you get nothing for a year. 2013 doesn't have any. 2014, you got a couple. Then nothing. 2016, you got 1. Then nothing until 2018 where you get A whole bunch of whole cluster, that's probably due to a flu epidemic because always these spikes that you see, these black lines previously on the left hand side, They're all due to the winter flu season, so you gotta remember that. They all all these deaths happened June, July, August. So there in 2018, we had a a big flu epidemic. Moving on to the right, we got another one. Then The next red one, the Christchurch massacre, which was in 2019 in March. But from that, you get a a cluster in 2020, a whole bunch there. May have been another bad flu season. We don't know. But then from 2021, you see A black line there appearing, and then it's like a flick of a switch. Suddenly, the black lines get closer together, And there's more of them. Very thick black lines there. So this this one here, Peak deaths was COVID with or from COVID, but then the deaths from COVID, if you look at the Worldometer website, it correlates to that. That was the same time, and they said that over 60 people died with or from COVID. Then after that, it suddenly suddenly drops off. So after that, you only get a couple of people a day dying with or from COVID. So if you if you go back to The chart there, in that case, you would you would expect to see the black lines disappear because no one's dying from COVID anymore. Right? But you're not. Yeah. Absolutely not. You're seeing the black lines. There are more people dying than ever before. These are the biggest number of deaths we've seen in history of New Zealand. The death rate has gone up 6%, 8% year on year. Even after COVID wasn't a thing. The death rate is still going up. And that's illustrated here by these black lines which are still going on.
Saved - November 27, 2023 at 9:30 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

75% of those with vaccine induced myocarditis will die in 10 years, and turbo cancers are spreading like wild fire through the vaccinated population. No one will be left unaffected, we all have people we care about who had the jab, when do we rise up? https://t.co/JOXC7uaK5W

Video Transcript AI Summary
Research from Basel, Switzerland shows that 5-9% of people in a study experienced significant cardiac harm from the vaccine, resulting in 50,000 to 90,000 cases of heart damage per 1,000,000 citizens. If diagnosed with myocarditis, 75% of individuals will die within 10 years, with the only option being a transplant. Vaccine-induced myocarditis leads to a 50% mortality rate within 5 years and 75% within 10 years. Menstrual abnormalities, infertility, and aggressive cancers are also spreading among the vaccinated population. This is a result of a well-controlled and widespread lie perpetuated by multiple agencies. We must consider the health and fertility of our nation as a patient in need of urgent care.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another complete lie. Why? Because we know from research out of Basel, Switzerland that five to 9% of the people in that study experienced significant cardiac harm. 5 to 9%, that's 50,000 to 90,000 situations of heart damage for every middle for every 1,000,000 citizens to get the jab. That's pretty nasty truth. And as a doctor, I know that if you actually get myocarditis, if you have diagnosable myocarditis, I've known this for 45 years, and it's still true. 75% of you will be dead in 10 years. I'm very sorry to tell that to families and to people who have a child or themselves with myocarditis, it's either that or a transplant. You might succeed if you get a transplant. So those are your those are your choices. If you've got vaccine induced myocarditis with evident harm, 50% are dead in 5 years, 75% are dead in 10 years. That's the problem with truth. It's sad. And that's the problem when we've been lied to and allowed truths like this to occur in our bodies and in the bodies of our dearly departed loved ones. Other truths are that we know that massive numbers of menstrual abnormalities and infertility are spreading through the vaxxed. Doctor Jim Thorpe has told us that. And I believe the gynecologist and obstetrician that spoke earlier this afternoon alluded to that. 2 cancer specialists, doctor Gauk Dalgliche and, of course, doctor Cole as well, have let us know that aggressive turbo speed cancers are spreading through the vaccinated population. And Jessica Rose has told us the reason for that. So it's all coming together, isn't it? It's been 1 big horrific lie allowed to exist because the lie was so kept well controlled. The lie was so well told by multiple agencies, who were obviously in touch with each other, very obviously in touch with each other. So today, I'd like you to think for a moment that you're not in the parliament. You're in the emergency room for your nation. The health and fertility of your nation is the patient. When the patient is in front of you, you
Saved - November 24, 2023 at 8:38 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Two stories on BBC about the trouble in Dublin last night. No where in either article is there any mention of immigrant, immigration, Algerian, etc etc Plenty of demonisation of the 'far right' though. We are being baited. https://t.co/gwZ6G0Tss4

Saved - November 23, 2023 at 5:49 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Some will never apologise for what they did and said. Instead Cox has blocked and locked. Rather than face the ire of those he mocked. What a c**t. https://t.co/iQ5QiVVlcA

Saved - November 22, 2023 at 1:26 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Patrick Vallance thinks we should have locked down sooner. The covid inquiry is a scam, probably to lead us into the WHO Pandemic Treaty. None of the restrictions were ever needed, including MRNA jabs. They told us this multiple times during covid 👇 https://t.co/1JWCfv1u9F

Video Transcript AI Summary
For the majority of people who contract this virus, it will result in a mild to moderate illness, including older individuals. The risk is higher for older people, but it does not mean they are likely to pass away. Most people, regardless of age, will survive the virus, even those in their eighties. The majority of cases can be managed at home, and not everyone will need testing. It is important to emphasize that the disease is generally mild for most individuals. Older people are at higher risk, but they will still experience a mild to moderate illness in the majority of cases. Recovery is expected for the majority of people, regardless of age.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's always worth stressing with this that for the overwhelming majority of people, this is gonna be, who get it. This is gonna be a mild, to moderate, illness. Don't forget that, even if you get this illness, for the overwhelming majority of people, even in the elderly groups, it won't be, it won't be it will be mild to moderate. Speaker 1: You know, it is clear that the risk is very heavily weighted towards older people. But I think people translate that into if I'm old and then I get it, I'm, You know, I'm likely to, pass away. Actually, the great majority of people will survive this even if they're in their eighties. Then, for people who have mild disease, which is the great majority of people, to be clear, most people have a mild or moderate infection. Some of them have something which they hardly notice at all. To make an obvious point to all of you, but it's worth reiterating, the great majority of people will be managed at home. Mhmm. Great majority. They'll be fine. Even in the most vulnerable, oldest groups in a very stressed health service, Which, Hubei was at the point when, the data most of the data come out of the great majority of people who caught this virus, and not everybody will, survived it. Great majority. It's easy to get a perception that if you're older and you get this virus, then You're a goner. Absolutely not. The great majority of people will recover from this virus even if they're in their 80s. Speaker 2: The great majority of people who have this infection will actually have a mild or moderate infection that will be managed at home and indeed will not need any testing. Speaker 0: I also want, at this stage, to speak directly to older people Because this disease is particularly dangerous, for you, for older people, even though the vast majority of older people, will experience a mild to moderate illness. Speaker 2: Also, because most people, The vast majority of people get a mild illness. For most people, it's a mild disease. Speaker 1: The great majority of people who get this virus, irrespective of age, will recover from it, and most of those will
Saved - October 30, 2023 at 2:28 AM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Sharing for educational purposes. WTF is going on? Makes the hair on the back of the neck stand up. https://t.co/ZALB37zy1O

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the discussion about COVID, the speaker lists various individuals in leadership positions and mentions their dual citizenship with Israel and Jewish background. They mention the director, deputy director, chief of staff, and chief medical officer of the CDC, as well as individuals from Pfizer, Moderna, BlackRock, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, and the World Economic Corps. Another person tries to interrupt the speaker, but they continue talking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When COVID was being enacted. I'm gonna read off the staff of who's in charge of this in, CDC. The director of the CDC was Rochelle Walensky, dual citizenship with Israel. She's a Jew. Deputy director of the CDC, Anne Shoalczyk, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. CDC the chief of staff, Sherry Berger, dual citizenship with Israel. Jew, CDC chief medical officer, Mitchell Wolf, dual citizenship with Speaker 1: talking about COVID. Right? This is Speaker 0: Yeah. This is this is pertinent to COVID, so I love you, Jennifer. With May I please speak? Yeah. Please. So director of the CDC of the Washington office, Jeff Rezek, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. With COVID czar Jeff Zients, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew, COVID senior adviser, Andy Slavitt, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew, assistant of health secretary for human services for our country, the assistant of health secretary, Rachel Levine, transgender in a citizenship with Israel Sue. Can I Speaker 1: ask that you hold off, Christopher? Ma'am, I'm almost done. Mister Head of Firewood. The the chair has ruled that your comments are out of order. She's asked you to stopped. How is that? The chair has He said, too. There's nothing wrong with you. It's not the wrong Speaker 0: exactly. Now Speaker 1: they go across to Okay. They'll keep on going. The head of Pfizer vaccines, Albert Bourla, Speaker 0: dual citizenship with Israel Jew. Pfizer chief scientist Michael Dostin, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. Moderna chief scientist Michael Dost in dual citizenship with Israel too. Moderna chief scientist, Paul Zeck, dual citizenship in Israel too. BlackRock everyone know BlackRock? BlackRock CEO Larry Faith, with dual citizenship of Israel. I said we're willing to sacrifice our ego, our reputation You have Speaker 1: nice views. Speaker 0: Yes, ma'am. And I love you, and I appreciate your patience. With, BlackRock president Ra Raab Kapital, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. The CDC chief medical officer of Johnson and Johnson joined Paul Schrecker, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. Chief medical officer Speaker 1: Roy Dunn. Speaker 0: Merck, Michael Rosenwald, dual citizenship Speaker 1: with Israel, Jew. Head Adviser to World Economic Corps, Yuval Harari, those citizens who in Israel do, and that's what we're talking about. Oh, that's not talking about. Christopher, you need to stop.
Saved - October 18, 2023 at 4:11 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

The Rothschild family instructed and paid for the British government (who they own) to create a Zionist state in Palestine. We are all being played and 1000s of people on all sides are dying. https://t.co/VMFNlWF0Ls

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Balfour Declaration, addressed to Lord Rothschild, expressed sympathy for Jewish Zionist aspirations and supported the establishment of a national home for Jewish people in Palestine. It emphasized the need to protect the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine and the political status of Jews in other countries. The speaker finds it remarkable that this declaration came to fruition after 3000 years of Jewish history. They attribute its success to the persuasive efforts of Hein Weitzman, who convinced key figures like Balfour and Lloyd George. Despite undergoing several drafts, the final letter compromised on certain points but remained significant for the Jewish community. Overall, it is considered a monumental event in Jewish history.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In modern Jewish history, and it begins with 3 words. Dear lord Rothchild. Speaker 1: Dear lord Rothchild, I have much pleasure in conveying to you on behalf of his majesty's government the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations, which has been submitted to and approved by the cabinet. Speaker 0: Why was it that this letter was sent by the foreign secretary to your great uncle Walter. Speaker 2: It's an interesting question because it was primarily a movement from Eastern Europe, But they didn't clarify who was in charge of that movement. And in addition, it was offshore in Great Britain. So they felt that the Rothchild family, should be the one to whom it was addressed. And Walter was lord Rothchild, and he was, a Zionist. And, those rarely are the background reasons. Speaker 0: So Walter received the Balfour Declaration, and and I have a copy here. And I wonder if I could possibly ask you to read it for us. Speaker 2: Yes, indeed. Yep. I'm gonna put on my spectacles to make sure I'm reading Accurately, his majesty's government deal with favor the establishment of Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people And we'll use our best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object. It being clearly understood that nothing should be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation. Yours, Arthur Balfour. Speaker 0: And here it is, the Balfour Declaration. What do you feel when you when you see it here? Speaker 2: I've genuinely felt it's one of the most extraordinary moments In the history of the Jewish people, if you think it took 3000 years, to get to this, and then you say, how did this miracle happen? As the most incredible piece of opportunism I mean, if you think you had an impoverished, would be scientist, Hein Weitzman, Who somehow gets to England, meets a few people, including those of my family, seduces them. He has such great charm and conviction. He gets to Balfour, and he unbelievably persuades Balfour and Lloyd George, the prime minister, And most of the ministers, but this idea of, the national home for, Jews Should be allowed to take place. I mean, it's so so unlikely. Speaker 0: It it Speaker 2: And then he's, you know, Starts to fight a difficult battle with the British cabinet, and this, letter goes through 5 drafts as you know. And in the end, it comes out as a rather compromising letter. I mean, the essential point is there for, the Jewish community to Fasten on to, you have the first bit which promises a national home rather than the national home, And then you have the bit that nothing that's to be done should, in any way, harm the Arab community. But you come back to the big point, which is that this is perhaps the greatest event in Jewish life for 1000 of years.
Saved - October 17, 2023 at 5:37 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

"We pumped dozens of stories about Cuban atrocities, Cuban rapists... We didn't know of a single atrocity committed by the Cubans. It was pure raw false propaganda to create an illusion of communists eating babies for breakfast."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The CIA has various functions, including running secret wars and spreading propaganda to influence people's minds. They manipulate journalists by providing them with both true and false stories, exploiting their vulnerabilities to control their actions. The Church Committee in 1975 revealed that around 400 journalists, including prominent names, cooperated with the CIA to introduce stories into the press. In the Angola war, a third of the speaker's staff was dedicated to propaganda. They would write stories, publish them in the Zambia Times, and then send them to journalists on their payroll in Europe, who would pretend to have received them from their own sources. The goal was to create false narratives about Cuban atrocities to demonize communists.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are other functions, however, some of them more legitimate than others. 1 is to run secret wars. Another thing is to disseminate propaganda to influence people's minds. And this is a major function of the CIA. And, unfortunately, of course, it overlaps into the gathering of information. You you have contact with a journalist. You will give him true stories. You'll get information from him. You'll also give him false story. You also work on their human vulnerabilities to recruit them in a classic sense to make them your agent so that you can control what they do so you don't have to set them up sort of, you know, by by putting one over on them, so you can say, here, plant this one next Tuesday. Can you do this with responsible rule reporters. Yes. The church committee brought it out in 1975, and then Woodward and Bernstein put an article in Rolling Stone a couple of years later, 400 journalists cooperating with the CIA, including some of the biggest names in the business, to consciously introduce the stories into the press. Well, give me a concrete example of how You use the press this way. Well, for example, in my my war, the Angola war that I helped to manage, 1 third of my staff was propaganda. I had propagandists all over the world, principally in London, Kinshasa, and Zambia. We were we would take stories which we would write and put them in the Zambia Times, and then pull them out and send them to journalist on our payroll in Europe. But his cover story, you see, would be that he would he'd gotten them from his stringer in Lusaka who had gotten them from the Zambia Times. But after that point, the journalists, Reuters and AFP, the management was not witting of it. Now our contact man in Europe was, and we pumped just just dozens of stories about Cuban atrocities, Cuban rapists, but we didn't know of one single atrocity committed by the Cubans. It was pure, raw, false propaganda and to to create an illusion of communists, you know, eating babies for breakfast.
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 5:07 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Guess who DIDN'T have the experimental gene therapy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
If someone refuses to be tested in our facilities, they will be required to stay for an additional 14 days. This serves as an incentive for individuals to get tested and ensure they are cleared. Most people will likely choose to take the test rather than prolong their stay in the facility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do we do if someone refuses to be tested? Well, they can't now. If someone refuses in our, facilities to be tested, they have to keep staying. So they won't be able to leave after 14 days. They have to stay on for another 14 days. So it's a pretty good incentive. You either get your tests done and make sure you're cleared, or we will keep you in a facility longer. So I think people most people will look at that and say, I'll take the I'll take the test.
Saved - September 28, 2023 at 5:52 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

"I didn't see a single patient die of covid' Frontline Nurse Nicole Sirotek State sponsored murdered, from cradle to grave.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a nurse, shares their experiences on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic. They express concerns about medical negligence and malfeasance, particularly regarding the use of the drug Remdesivir, which they claim is causing patient deaths. The nurse also mentions the lack of advocacy for marginalized populations and criticizes the isolation and lack of basic care in hospitals. They highlight the importance of nurses as the link between doctors and patients and express gratitude for the opportunity to speak out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Although, I am not a doctor. I'm just a nurse. But what we saw in these front lines, we knew what was happening. And when we asked for the Ibuprofen, they said, no. It was contraindicated. When we asked, like, why aren't we giving them steroids? Oh, well, it's not. We're just following orders. Following orders has led to the sheer number of deaths that has occurred in these hospitals. I didn't see a single patient died of COVID. I've seen a substantial number of patients die of negligence and medical malfeasance. When I was on the front lines of New York, I'm unfortunately known, We known globally viral as the nurse that was in the break room sobbing, saying that they were murdering my patients. The pharmaceutical companies had gone into those hospitals and decided to, and decided to practice, I guess you can say, on the minorities, on the disadvantaged, on the marginalized populations that we know that we had no advocates for because the very agencies that should have been protecting them were closed because we were sheltering in place. Now, while I was there and I saw that the pharmaceutical companies were rolling out Remdesivir onto the patients, I tried to get a hold of the IRBs. I tried to get a hold of my appropriate chain of command. I tried CMS. I tried Department of Health. And they rolled out Remdesivir onto a substantial number of patients for which we all saw it was killing the patients. And now, it's the FDA approved drug That is continuing to kill patients in the United States. As nurses, we've collected a statistical or descriptive amount of information that you may not get from the doctors. Because for more they do quantitative data, we do qualitative data with a humanistic phenomenological approach in nursing research. And so we've collected the data from all of these patients across the country from which we have been helping patients. Because I formed the organization American front line nurses and the advocacy network, so nurses could advocate for these patients. And all of this data pool shows That as these patients get Remdesivir, they have a less than 25% chance of survival if they get more than 2 doses. Now, they're rolling it out on children as well And into the nursing homes or school nursing facilities as early intervention when as Doctor. Pierre Kory and Doctor. Merrick have already demonstrated that there are Cost effective medications out there and we are going to see the amplification of death across our country. And we haven't even touched on the vaccines for which all of our expert panels have already very well described that situation. So I won't touch on that since many of them are by far superior to me than even I could ever hope to be. But I can tell you that 2 days ago, I I flew out my 1st 10 year old with a heart attack and I had to fight the doctor in the ER because he's like, 10 year olds don't have heart attacks. And I argued back and forth for 30 minutes to force his hand to get an EKG. To find out that he was had almost a complete STEMI, which is ST elevated myocardial infarction, for which you could see it lit up on the 12 lead EKG. And he's like, Well, that's not possible. And I'm like, Well, he was It's vaccinated yesterday. It is very much possible. At any given time, people are getting a hold of me and the nurse advocates at American Front Line Nurses to help advocate because as you've seen, there is victim shaming that it Oh, it's anxiety. Oh, it's this. But in actuality, if they put down that it was a vaccine injury, the physician, the corporation, the hospital, the clinic, they actually Won't get reimbursed, so it gets labeled as anxiety or neuropathy or Jan Barre syndrome, when in actuality it's very realistically a vaccine injury. Now I'm not even though I founded American Front Line Nurses, I've traveled extensively to South America, India and South Africa working in hot zones, stopping the spread of the virus and working with early intervention. And nowhere in those countries and developing nations, Do I see these issues that we see here in the United States? It's actually I'm a very proud American citizen. I come from a family of immigrants and my mother told me that the United States is the best country in the world. Though granted, I am biased being an American. And our level of health care has been deteriorated to substandard third world nation health here. Whereas I tell people, you are better off in South America in a field hospital than you are in level 1 trauma designer hospitals in the United States. As nurses, we are getting reports across the country from our American frontline nurses about patients not getting food, patients not getting water. How come a patient hasn't been fed in 9 days? Why do I need to get a court order to force a hospital to feed a person who isn't intubated and who's literally telling you they would like food? Oh, well, you can't take your BiPAP mask off. Well, that's what us nurses are for. We're going to help you take that off. We're going to help you eat, but we're not allowed to. And if you know, if they're on a ventilator, they're not getting basic standards of care. I've had patients that haven't been bathed, haven't been fed, haven't been given water, haven't been turned. And if you ask me, this isn't a hospital. This is a concentration camp. That's right. Absolutely, it is. Nowhere in the United States do we isolate people for 100 of hours at a time with no human contact. It's not even allowed in the prisons. You are not allowed to isolate a prisoner for beyond a certain extensive amount of time because it is again it is horrible for their mental health and is considered inhumane. However, in these hospitals now, we're allowed to isolate patients from their families for days. And you have to say Goodbye to them over an iPhone as Jennifer Bridges has just demonstrated to us or she has to shuttle people in to see. And personally, I was fired for sneaking Hispanic family in to say the last rights to their family. And so thank you, Senator Johnson, for Giving nurses the opportunity to come and represent our patients because as you can see, we're not often thought of as Leading professionals, though we are the missing link between the doctors and the patients. So thank you so much for this time. Thank you for being a nurse.
Saved - September 11, 2023 at 2:21 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

It isn't depopulation, or population decline, it is a managed extinction. Neil Oliver get's it, do you? It is a War on Humanity... Children of Men.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a war against humanity, led by predators and philanthropists, with the aim of making us accept less. The message used to be about abundance and the potential of more people, but now it's about reducing the population. Transhumanism is seen as an upgrade, but it's really eugenics in disguise. Bill Gates and others promote limited aspirations for everyone else while enjoying immense wealth and possessions. They preach about saving the planet but live extravagant lifestyles themselves. The elites want control while we are told to live smaller lives. It's hypocritical and we need to recognize their true intentions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thanks, Aaron. There's a war on, a war on humanity, a war against the people, waged by predators and philanthropaths, aided by poodles in government and the establishment. The declared aim of the war is to force all of us to accept less. At what point did we abandon the notion of hopes and dreams, the desirability of abundance, of plenty. The message from on high used to be about going forth, being fruitful and multiplying. The more the merrier, we were told. The desire was for abundance, including an abundance of people, but not anymore. If you don't hate people Then you might see that more people in the world means more good ideas, more problem solving potential. If you combine copper and tin, just 2 elements, You get bronze and a harder edge. If you combine 4 elements of 10, the potential comes in numbers with more zeros than a person might count. Limitless potential. It's the same with people and good ideas. But for a long time the message from above has been that humanity is a mistake by Mother Earth, that we are a plague she would do better without. Transhumanism is more of the same, the notion that humanity is not good enough and hopeless without an upgrade made of merging flesh with technology, technology to make more 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars for the technocrats and philanthropists. Transhumanism is eugenics, the conviction that some clever people must take responsibility for ridding the species of perceived flaws and inadequacies, playing God. The original eugenicists spoke and wrote about useless mouths, the transhumanists speak and write about useless eaters. What goes around comes around, The anti human agenda is everywhere, infecting every walk of life. It baffles me that we're supposed to accept those that we should have less, less of everything except cold, hunger and poverty, demonstrably can't get enough for themselves, of everything. Software salesman Bill Gates is one of many who talks about how the future will be a better place if fewer people are alive on the planet. In a world in which infertility is everywhere, in which nation after nation, especially in the West, is failing to produce enough babies even to maintain populations where children are mutilated into barren sterility. Gates and Coe preach the religion of managed extinction. He's hardly alone. In an article in The Guardian in 2009, the late Duke of Edinburgh, a father of Fuller himself, was quoted saying, In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus to contribute something to solving overpopulation. Stanley Johnson, father of baby daddy Boris and of 4 children in total, predicts a future Britain doing splendidly, if the island is home to just 10 to 15000000 people. Bill Gates is all about limited aspirations for everyone else, everyone but him and his, and yet he has a fortune and a hall of possessions so great, it's impossible to unearth and list the extent of it all. He certainly has a financial work to be counted in the 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars. He's the largest land owner in the United States with holdings in test of 270,000 acres, while Agenda 21, the humanity hating blueprint for sustainability, a word that's shorthand for you can't have any of that anymore, promotes an end to private home ownership and single occupancy. Gates has multiple homes. His principal address is a 66,000 square foot mansion in Medina, Washington, valued in 2021 at $130,000,000. It's nicknamed Xanadu 2.0 and has, among mind boggling range and opulence, a dining room for 200 people. He's no fan of cattle, old Bill, and has said all the people of the developed nations should switch to meat grown in laboratories, for sale by companies he owns, obviously having invested heavily in Frankenstein fodder. It's not about saving the planet because the production of this Ultra processed material has a heftier carbon footprint pound for pound than cattle themselves. Bill Gates is very set about how much carbon you and I make while living our little lives. And yet as of February this year, his collection of aircraft numbered 6, Four private jets, a helicopter and a seaplane. He has described private jets as his guilty pleasure. For Gates and his ilk, we are the problem, while he, in his own mind at least, is the solution. The so called elites of the World Economic Forum, pontificate about how all the control in the world ought to be in their hands, the hands of a technocracy. I prefer cackocracy, being ruled by the very worst of people. While we, on the other hand, should have nothing and be happy. When I talk about these stated aims of the WEF, I'm dismissed by the mainstream and their paid shills as a conspiracy theorist, and yet the avowed intention to increase the elite control of everything is there to be read in their own policy documents. My point remains, We are lectured and hectored about the necessity to live smaller, hungrier, colder, limited lives by those whose lifestyles are an exercise in excess. Joe Biden's climate czar, John Kerry, who preaches the end of the world is nigh, has a fortune of 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars and owns multiple homes. The family private jet was only sold last year after news broke it had pumped out 3 25 metric tonnes of carbon during just the 1st 18 months of his boss's presidency. When Democrat Al Gore ran for US president in the year 2000, His worth was listed at $1,700,000. 2 decades of climate alarmism later and he's worth $300,000,000. His investment firm is valued at $36,000,000,000 and pays him $2,000,000 a month in salary alone. The father of 4 has multiple homes, including a waterfront mansion in Montecito, valued at $13,000,000, which seems like quite a punt for a man who predicts the world's oceans are set to rise by 10 feet, or perhaps much more. All around us are high profile billionaires and multimillionaires reaching the need for crushing restraint for the proles from the comfort of sun loungers on the decks of super yachts. Among much else, we need a new, bigger word to replace secrecy, which is just not cutting it anymore.
Saved - September 10, 2023 at 4:31 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Neil Oliver nailing the financial system, surprising that he is allowed to say this. Money is a scam, a drug for the masses, now its use to control the public devalued, they need to get you into ULEZ, CBDC's, and the digital prison. Agenda 21

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the state of the government, referring to it as a rudderless ship being steered by unseen officers. They express distrust towards politicians, including Rishi Sunak and Sadiq Khan, and accuse them of causing destruction and social unrest. The speaker believes that the government's actions are distractions from a larger plan for a one-world government called Agenda 21. They also discuss the manipulation of the economy through inflation and the creation of money by central banks, which they argue keeps people in debt. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding these issues and encourages listeners to question the narrative presented by the government and media.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Ship of States in a hell of a state. Rudderless might be the word or hold below the waterline. You Les is the latest squall but only a part of something bigger and more sinister, looming all around. Uncontrolled migration is part of the same man made weather system, part of making people angry and keeping people angry. Neither is what it appears to be. EULEZ is billed as a health measure, but it's just highway robbery and cover for the introduction The migration is the free movement of people. Any British government that wanted to stem the flow or stop it would do so in a day, but the puppets pretending to govern aren't allowed to. I said the word to use about the shipper state might be rudderless, but that would be to fall for the carefully curated optical illusion. It's being steered all right, but by officers none of us proles chose and towards a destination none of us wants, Except, of course, the people who plotted the course long ago. No one with a brain thinks Rishi Sunak is running Britain. Not even his colleagues. London Mayor Sadiq Khan, another homunculus in a suit from the boys department, loathes Britain and is laying waste to a once great city. And the puppet government is fine with it. Cannes sows racial hatred and social unrest to accomplish the same destruction the Romans inflicted on Carthage by ploughing salt into fertile fields so nothing would ever grow there again. Here, Starmer and the fake Labour Party await their turn at the tiller. But all they'll do is shovel more coal into the furnaces, More speed towards the iceberg. It mystifies me that journalists interview these frauds as though they matter. I'd no more ask a senior politician what was going on in Britain than I would a character from a soap opera. Grant Sharps as Defence Secretary. Do me a favour. You might as well make one of my wolfhound's Defence Secretary. She'd have as much meaningful input to policy. At least Jesse's a real wolfhound. Don't fall for any of it. If I had the resources, I'd have it's never about what they say it's about plastered onto chilly orbiting airships and projected onto the surface of the moon where everyone might see it. Eulaz is the Flicking tail on the elephant in the room. The monstrous beast that is Agenda 21, a plan for 1 world government, misrepresented as good news. For those thinking it's about the year 2021 and that we've missed the deadline, Agenda 21 is a plan for the whole of 21st century. Whatever the puppet government and the puppet opposition say about anything is always and only to distract from the real plan and therefore the real threat to our freedom and way of life. The misdirection and downright lying infect and corrupt every aspect of life. Otto von Bismarck is credited with saying The less people know about how laws and sausages are made, the better they'll sleep at night. That depends on whether you want to be asleep or awake, however uncomfortably. The sleepiness is everywhere. A long process of miseducation at school and a forced diet of propaganda for the rest The time has, for instance, seemed to the rearing of a population that either thinks money and the economy are too complicated for them to understand or has accepted the furry end of the lollipop stick handed to them by the powers that be. Inflation. What they would have us believe is to blame for the Cost of living crisis, which is really a cost of lockdown crisis, is caused always and only by government working And in glove with the banks to make themselves rich and everyone else poor. Inflation is caused Always and only by the printing of money. Quantitative easing, as they have called it most recently, although dodgy types alighted on the tactic 1000 of years ago to keep their subjects poor is a transparent attempt to disguise a Ponzi scheme. The Ponzi scheme being modern currencies, which is the conjuring into existence of money from nothing, which only banks are allowed to do. Every time they magic up more money, put more of the currency into circulation in whatever form, What they actually do, in fact, all they do, is devalue any money you had in your pocket or in savings. This is deliberate. This is why excess money is created in the 1st place. Just as a for instance, since the creation of the so called Federal Reserve in the United States in 1913, which is not federal, being a private company run for profit by secretive bankers and hold a reserve of precisely nothing, the actual value of the dollar has fallen by at least 90, if not actually 98%. Inflation is the invisible tax. I'll say that again for emphasis. The invisible tacks almost everyone has been tricked into not seeing, far less being angry about. The same trick, a trick that would be illegal if any of us tried it, is pulled here in Britain by our own central bank, the Bank of England, And by central banks around the world, all of them in service to the bank for international settlements, in splendid isolation in Geneva, in Switzerland, where none of us can affect its operation in any way. Our government, everyone's government, be it nominally democratic, fascist, Totalitarian, communist or monster raving loony. It makes no different. Uses banks to put people into debt and then continuously devalues the currency by creating more money always out of nowhere and so making it harder and harder, all but impossible in fact, for anyone ever to be free of that debt. If all debt was repaid, all money would vanish. You heard me right. If you understand that much, you understand the money flow of the world. This stuff is hiding in plain sight, but so easy to understand when you bother to look at it. And I say that as someone who got a C in maths.
Saved - September 10, 2023 at 4:31 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Part 2: ULEZ, CBDCs, NWO, & Agenda 21. Neil Oliver waking up the sheep.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses various global issues such as wildfires, the war in Ukraine, COVID variants, and migrant crises. They claim that national currencies are on the verge of collapse and predict the rise of central bank digital currencies. The speaker then introduces Agenda 21, a sustainable development plan, and argues that it aims to control all aspects of life, concentrating the population in cities and removing power from the people. They criticize the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group for its proposals to combat climate change, which include banning flying and shipping, cutting home heating, and using alternative building materials. The speaker concludes by expressing their opposition to this future, calling it joyless, totalitarian, and anti-human.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's easy to understand but only if you don't look over there at the suspicious wildfires in Greece and the incomprehensible fires in Maui and the wildly lucrative war in Ukraine and a new COVID variant and the migrants being shepherded ashore every day and used most recently to displace students from their boot and paid for accommodation to sow more fury. If you don't look over there at all that, or when you do understand it for it is or what it is, distraction gone awry, but back here instead where the pretend government is cooking the books and selling Britain down the river, once you see it, you can't believe you overlooked it for so long. I said most of the value of the dollar has been wiped out. So too that of the pound, the euro, you name it. The national currencies around the world are Ponzi schemes teetering on the brink of collapse and held up only by malpractice and lies. The next step, maybe not today and maybe not tomorrow, but when the people think they can't take any more uncertainty, will be central bank digital currencies. And here we get back to the monster. The elephant in the room that most neither acknowledge nor talk about. Indeed, that most don't even see, which is Agenda 21. EULEZ is part of Agenda 21. CBDC is part of it. Digital ID is part of it. Surveillance cameras and checkpoints are part of it. 15 minute ghettos are part of it. Cycle lanes are part of it. The devaluing of money is part of the softening up. The ever increasing debt is part of that. The stoking of anxiety, of fear, of hatred of other, climate crisis and forever war, all about destroying the old and ushering in the new. In 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, 179 countries agreed plans for a sustainable future for planet Earth. Sustainable is a weasel word in this context chosen to seduce. Just as everyone would support a project to protect puppies and kittens from cruelty, So no one would say they were opposed to sustaining life on Earth. Sustainable in the hands of the authors of agenda 21, however, is dread laden and means your way of life, my way of life, and the way of life you'd hoped for for your children is unsustainable and forbidden. In summary, the way of life that has been described as middle class is, according to those pushing Agenda 21, unsustainable and must end. The usual mouthpieces of the mainstream will dismiss this as conspiracy theory. But what is undeniable is that it's out there in plain sight. There's from Rio, priced £11.4 in paperback. What someone somewhere has decided is sustainable is to be made possible by, to quote American campaigner Rosa Corry, the late great siren warning of all things agenda 21, Control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, All information and all human beings in the world. Corrie pointed out how an unholy union of corporations, nongovernmental organizations and governments is pushing ever more desperately towards a world in which the entire population is concentrated in densely populated cities. What's intended is a world of public private partnerships, what the WES Klaus Schwab calls stakeholder capitalism, that takes all power and decision making away from the people and places it in the hands of entities over which we, the voting public, have zero influence, far less control. A person can easily sense the impotent wrath of CAN, WEE Sadiq, as he receives the daily reports of the popular dismantling of his Iulez infrastructure, as well as a vast majority of his surveillance cameras being put out of action by citizen soldiers. God bless you all. The legal basis of his efforts is being challenged too. Worth observing that Sadiq Khan is being embarrassed not just in front of Londoners and the wider British public, but also in front of his pals in the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, of which he has been chairman since 2021. I don't know if you know, but C40 is, according to its Wikipedia page, focused on fighting the climate crisis and driving urban action that reduces greenhouse gas emissions and climate risks. It's also embed with proposals to end flying and shipping by 2,050, The cutting home heating, banning beef and lamb, and ending building with bricks, cement, glass and steel in favour of rammed earth, what you might call the building of mud huts. Here's the thing. The future being discussed might permit existence for the likes of you and me, but will be no life I recognize as honourable or worth living. Altogether now, tell them they can stick the whole joyless, Totalitarian, hypocritical, anti human lot of it where the sun don't shine.
Saved - September 4, 2023 at 1:32 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Their last line of defence. "Nobody forced you to take the vaccine"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Individuals have the freedom to choose whether or not to get vaccinated. While there may be various reasons for vaccine hesitancy, enforcement measures ensure that everyone is vaccinated without forcing them. One person questions if people were forced to get vaccinated to keep their jobs, but another firmly believes that nobody was forced. Those who choose not to get vaccinated may not be able to work. However, it is emphasized that everyone had the opportunity to decide for themselves. Vaccine mandates are expanding to cover a significant portion of the workforce, creating distinctions between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Certain businesses like hospitality, hairdressers, and gyms can operate if they require customers to show vaccine certificates. It is clarified that vaccination was not compulsory, and people made their own choices. The requirement for customers to be vaccinated also applies to workers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Individuals are allowed to make their own choices. There may be all sorts of different reasons why someone is hesitant to get vaccinated. And therefore, while not forcing anyone to get vaccinated, enforcement measures in place will make sure that everyone is vaccinated. Speaker 1: People to have their jobs, to keep their jobs, Were forced to have the vaccination. Now do you retract your statement that they were not forced? Speaker 2: Senator, no, I believe firmly that nobody was forced to have a vaccine. Speaker 1: If people that don't want this mandatory vaccine, how do we manage it? Speaker 3: Well, then they won't be to Speaker 1: work. Speaker 3: It's very, very simple. Speaker 2: I believe everybody was offered an opportunity to get a vaccine or not get a vaccine, I don't believe that anybody was forced to take a vaccine. Speaker 3: We have said no. You must Get vaccinated. In terms of the vaccine mandates, I acknowledge that it was a challenging time for people but they made ultimately made their own choices. A vaccine mandate is being expanded to around 40% of all workers. You basically see it between different classes of people. If you're vaccinated Speaker 1: That is what it is. So, yes, hospitality, hairdressers and gyms Can operate at all levels if they ask customers for a vaccine certificate. Speaker 3: There was no there was no compulsory vaccination. People made their own choices. Speaker 1: And so it follows But if customers must be vaccinated, then so too must the workers.
Saved - September 3, 2023 at 1:12 PM

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

No one forced you to take the jab. Is their last line of defence.

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the vaccine mandates, individuals faced challenges but were able to make their own choices without any compulsory vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In terms of the vaccine mandates, I acknowledge that it was a challenging time for people, but they made ultimately made their own choices. Their own choices. There was no there was no compulsory vaccination. People made their own choices.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the coming months, efforts will be made to reach out to individuals who have not yet received their vaccination or missed their appointments. The goal is to ensure that every New Zealander has the opportunity to get vaccinated by the end of the year. However, it is anticipated that there may be some hesitant or unresponsive individuals who will require additional outreach efforts, possibly extending into next year. Despite this, the commitment remains to provide everyone with the chance to get vaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think early next year, we'll be in the phase of chasing up people who haven't come forward to get their vaccination or have missed their bookings and so on. So, everyone will be able to get a vaccine between now and the end of the year. But, of course, you know and I want every New Zealander to come forward, But human behaviour suggests that there will be some people that we have to actually really go out and look for. And some of that may spill into next year. But Our commitment is everyone will have the opportunity to get the vaccine by the end of the year. Everyone will. But I can't say that, you know, that we're not gonna have some hesitant people or some people who just haven't come forward that we don't have to go out and find next
View Full Interactive Feed