TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @JimFergusonUK
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 THREE DAYS BEFORE HE WAS MURDERED... CHARLIE KIRK ISSUED THIS WARNING. He warned that Marxism and Islamism were forming an alliance against Western civilisation. His words are now being shared around the world. 🎥 Watch. 👇 https://t.co/xl7kmZYQFB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says a spiritual battle is coming to the West, driven by enemies they describe as “wokeism or Marxism” combining with Islamism to target what they call the American way of life. They define the American way of life as being able to get married, buy a home, have kids, and let children ride their bikes until sunset. They also emphasize sending children to good schools, living in low-crime neighborhoods, and ensuring children are not taught “lesbian, gay, transgender garbage” in school. The speaker additionally highlights not having children repeatedly hear the Muslim call to prayer five times a day.
They state they want the American way of life, which they say is “Christendom” and “Christians.” They conclude that Western civilization is an outgrowth of scriptures, shaped by “sacrifice, toil, and vision.”
Full Transcript
The spiritual battle is coming to the West, and the enemies are wokeism or Marxism combining with Islamism to go after what we call the American way of life. And the American way of life is very simple. I wanna be able to get married, buy a home, have kids, allow them to ride their bike till the sun goes down, send them to a good school, have a low crime neighborhood, not to have my kids be taught the lesbian, gay, transgender garbage in their school. While also, while also not having them have to hear the Muslim call to prayer five times a day. That's important. We want the American way of life, which is, by the way, Christendom. Christians. Our sacrifice, our toil, our vision, the outgrowth of the scriptures gave us Western civilization
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I speak with serving Canadian MP Dean Allison and constitutional lawyer Shawn Buckley about their campaign to expose what they call one of the greatest public health scandals in modern history. We discuss censorship, vaccine injury, media accountability, Canada’s MAID programme, and why they believe thousands of victims deserve their voices heard.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 THE COVID COVER-UP IS BEING CHALLENGED FROM INSIDE PARLIAMENT The silence is beginning to break. In this explosive interview, I speak with serving Canadian MP Dean Allison and constitutional lawyer Shawn Buckley about their campaign to expose what they describe as one of the greatest public health scandals in modern history. We discuss censorship, vaccine injury, the media, accountability, Canada's MAID programme and why they believe thousands of victims deserve to have their voices finally heard. If they're right, the implications reach far beyond Canada. This is an interview you cannot afford to miss. 🎥👇@DeanAllisonMP @shawnbuckleylaw @AllisonInquiry
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jim Ferguson welcomes Canadian guests Dean Allison and Sean Buckley to the show.
Sean Buckley describes himself as a constitutional lawyer with 31 years of practice, often representing companies and practitioners facing government efforts to shut down their work related to natural health products/dietary supplements under a pharmaceutical drug model. He says that when COVID began, he and his wife Theresa were lead organizers of the National Citizens Inquiry, with him acting as lead counsel and personally calling over half of the witnesses. He is also president of the Natural Health Product Protection Association, which he describes as a citizen watchdog, and says he has been involved with the “Alison inquiry” as part of setting it up.
Dean Allison says he has been elected since 2004, reelected eight times, and is a Conservative Member of Parliament in Ontario, about half an hour from Niagara Falls. He chairs committees and is currently chairing a major/special projects committee joint with the Senate reporting back to Parliament on progress. He says he met Sean when Sean came to Ottawa in October and that they discussed possibilities after his experiences with public concerns he hears from constituents.
Allison explains that, as an MP, his job is to listen to constituents’ stories and advocate for them regarding government programs. He describes growing censorship in Canada and says that it creates a chill on discussing topics government does not want discussed. He argues that constituents can speak privately about injuries, lockdowns, and related issues, including vaccine injury programs, but that public discussion is frowned upon or discouraged. He says one goal of the inquiry is to give people permission to tell their stories publicly so they can talk with family, friends, and colleagues about what happened—especially when they believe the government does not want it discussed—and to create a public conversation through which healing and progress can occur.
Jim Ferguson references Canada and international freedom efforts, including convoy-related activities, and asks what motivated Sean to build and advance the inquiry and how support from sitting MPs fits into the project.
Sean says his primary motivation is COVID-19 vaccines, which he claims are still being given to children starting at six months of age. He frames this as culpable homicide or criminal negligence in his view, saying his motivation is “to stop harming people.” He describes a “health crisis,” saying many Canadians are harmed by the vaccine and that people are not being treated properly because Canada cannot admit vaccine-caused injury while the official narrative says the vaccines are safe and effective and that harm is caused by long COVID. He says some Canadians believe that messaging is wrong and that, in his account, medical doctors who might speak publicly about vaccine harm could face professional discipline or lose the right to practice. He adds that vaccine-injured people are denied medical treatments because those treatments are not approved for vaccine injury, and he describes long waits and emergency ward delays. He emphasizes that he is not describing “anti-vaxxers,” but people who were injured, sometimes after being coerced or threatened, and he says they need their stories listened to and medical care provided.
Ferguson asks when red flags first appeared for Sean. Sean says he had already been “hardwired” from past experience not to trust Health Canada. He describes earlier legal experiences and, during COVID, says he recognized what he considered fraud related to vaccine approval processes, including claims that animal studies failed in a way that made him believe approval was wrong. He recounts his belief that the world moved into “lockstep” and says he observed fear and coercion that he thinks pushed people to comply.
Ferguson asks Dean about what he saw and whether he faced pressure for speaking out. Dean says he encountered pressure within his party and leadership and gives lockdowns as an example. He describes lockdowns as deadly for small businesses and says leadership treated concerns as provincial rather than within his responsibilities. He says he received calls from constituents including families and individuals affected by lockdown rules, such as students and nursing students forced to stop education and older truck drivers who had allergic reactions and were denied exemptions even when they had previously had adverse reactions to other vaccines. He describes rules that he calls “insanity,” such as families unable to take children outdoors to parks. Dean says he questioned government decisions, followed money, and believed that leaders did not always have people’s best interests at heart. He says he saw political pressure to maintain a unified front and that legislation and narratives limited what could be discussed publicly.
Ferguson connects this to broader issues of censorship. Dean argues that across Canada and other countries there is increasing censorship and legislation that sets “the cage” of what people are allowed to discuss, and he asks why people are not allowed to challenge government. He claims mainstream censorship and political narratives began in COVID. He adds that MPs and opposition roles require holding government accountable. He says people should be able to talk publicly about stories received through emails, voice mails, and letters, and that these constituents have been marginalized or called names.
Sean expands by arguing that mainstream media is necessary for the narrative to function, and he describes Canada as having government-linked and homogeneous messaging, citing CBC as a government broadcaster and suggesting that government and pharmaceutical advertising influence media. He also states that, in his account, public trust in public health cannot be restored without a discussion because large portions of populations in other countries believe vaccines caused serious harm. He says mainstream media pushback has been “vicious” toward those raising concerns, and he uses examples from Canada’s past blood-supply scandal to argue that public trust can be restored only after acknowledging and fixing issues. He claims people are suffering and that Canada’s healthcare mismanagement leads to inability to properly treat those harmed.
Ferguson then raises assisted suicide/MAID, describing horror at injured vaccine recipients and some veterans being offered it. Dean says conservative MPs introduced private members bills aiming to address concerns, arguing the policy expanded beyond its original purpose. He says guardrails have loosened over time, and he describes MAID being offered even to people who come forward with poverty issues rather than terminal conditions. He argues this affects the most vulnerable, including seniors in nursing homes, disabled people in group homes, and teens with mental health challenges. He says he wants rollbacks, restricting access to protect those who are struggling and cannot make stable, fully informed life-ending decisions. He also claims MAID is being driven by cost-saving logic and describes further concerns around incentives and system pressures.
Ferguson asks about British financial conflicts involving Moderna. He says that a Guardian journalist exposed an alleged £/USD-scale investment by then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak (stated as $500,000,000) into Moderna and further described contracts in the UK via a shell company. Sean says he was not previously aware of this and references allegations that Justin Trudeau may also have invested or been involved financially. Dean responds that conflicts of interest and lack of accountability are issues in Canada and other Western democracies and frames this as institutional rot and moral decline.
Later, the conversation turns to Alberta potentially considering independence or separation. Sean says he lives in Alberta and describes historical oil policy and energy market changes, including a 1973 national energy policy which he says tanked Alberta’s oil industry and caused anger. He describes equalization as money being pulled from producing provinces and given to poorer provinces, which he says has fueled long-term resentment. He says COVID-era federal overreach was another “last straw” and may have ignited renewed separatist sentiment, though he says he does not know if a referendum will happen. Dean says he would prefer Alberta stay in Canada but understands the frustration. He says Alberta’s resources have not been allowed to develop and that federal equalization and lack of conversation contribute to anger. He argues that developing Alberta’s resources helps manufacturing in Ontario and that addressing these two issues could reduce tension while keeping Alberta in the country.
Sean and Dean discuss the “Alison inquiry.” Sean says the inquiry will be live-broadcast from Parliament Hill on September 8–11 and will allow MPs to listen to vaccine-injured persons’ stories through questioning and engagement. Sean says mainstream media and the government message have not allowed such conversations publicly, but that public interest has spread. He adds that the inquiry is being funded by volunteers because MPs are not given a budget, and he says costs include flying witnesses and housing them, with some witnesses needing extra recovery time. He provides where to go for donations: he says alisoninquiry.com will appear, but the donation-related web address referenced is COVID testimony, and there is a donate tab for a not-for-profit corporation created to take and disperse funds. He says he is contacting witnesses to ask whether they can cover travel costs because many cannot, and he says many are afraid to testify.
Dean says a core challenge he sees is people feeling alone because they are not allowed to talk publicly. He gives an example of a constituent injured long ago who has joint pain and receives prescriptions without understanding and cannot get help because doctors won’t acknowledge the issue. Dean argues that open conversation helps people realize they are not alone and can help reduce unanswered questions and enable better care. He also says the government admitted vaccine injury exists via a vaccine injury program, describing a low compensation rate compared with numbers the government admits—stating that 252 out of a potential 60,000 were compensated (0.4 percent).
In closing, Sean emphasizes that the inquiry may be “life changing,” that medical professionals should not be afraid to have the conversation, and that restoring confidence in public health requires dialogue and acknowledgment of harm and injury. Dean reiterates support for giving people permission to speak publicly, expanding conversations, and improving compensation and treatment systems so it never happens again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, thanks very much indeed. Welcome to the show. I am Jim Ferguson. I'm delighted to welcome two great Canadian patriots all the way from Canada, Dean Allison and Sean Buckley. Gentlemen, it's really, an honor for me to have you both on the show with me.
Thank you.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having us on.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Thanks for having us, Jim. It's just a pleasure.
Speaker 0: Well, I I assure you the pleasure is mine. Now we're we're because you're first time guests on the show, I would be very grateful if you would both introduce yourself. Well, maybe start with yourself, Sean. Just say a little bit about who you are, what you do, and and, generally speaking, where are you located?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Okay. So I'm a a constitutional lawyer. I've been practicing for thirty one years. And most of my career, I've been I well, I refer to it as resisting the machine, but in the area of protecting our access to natural health products or what you know, dietary supplements.
We're, we're in a complete pharmaceutical drug model, and so I represent companies and practitioners when our government is trying to shut them down for helping people. And then, also when COVID hit, I, I was on the Ground floor, and and my wife, Theresa, and I were the lead organizers of the National Citizens Inquiry. And as lead counsel, I called over half of the witnesses personally that were called at that inquiry. I'm also president of what's called the Natural Health Product Protection Association, which is kind of a citizen watchdog to protect our health rights. So, yeah, it's in connection with that that I had the honor to meet Dean.
We were we were in Ottawa for something connected to that. So and and now I'm I'm involved with the Alison inquiry helping to set up that up. So
Speaker 0: Great. You you know, I have to say I've got huge respect for the Canadians. We took our inspiration in terms of Freedom Tree International being an international, freedom movement from the the Freedom Convoy. And I I was very pleased and honored to have been invited over there. I was in Ottawa, marched down Parliament Hill, met all of the the respective leaders there.
So you guys led the way in terms of the world, and we'll come on to some of that shortly. But maybe, Dean, if we can maybe go on to yourself as well and just tell us a little bit about yourself and where you're located, what you do.
Speaker 1: Sure. So, I've been I was elected in 2,004, and I've been elected eight times. So I've been, just celebrated my twenty two year anniversary. I'm a member of parliament in Ontario. As a matter of fact, I'm most people would get the reference of Niagara Falls.
I'm about a half an hour from Niagara Falls, and my riding's, you know, partly rural, mostly rural. Like, you know, I'm close enough to cities. And as I said, I've been a conservative member of parliament for those, for those twenty two years. Chaired a bunch of committees. I've chaired the foreign affairs committee.
I'm presently chairing a committee, on, special projects or major projects in our country that, our liberal government set up to try and get, resource projects going. You don't need to ask people if that's not really going, but we're we're a committee that is, also joint with the senate that's reporting back to parliament on how their progress is going. So that's what I'm doing currently right now. And as I said, I got a chance to meet Sean when he came to Ottawa back in October. And, and so we we sort of had a chance to have some discussions about what may happen.
You know, I never sat well with me for a lot of reasons, and we could talk about all 100 of them. But, you know, as my as a member of parliament, as you're well aware, Jim, you know, what we do is we listen to people, and we'll help advocate for them on behalf of government programs. That's what we do. That's that's our job, full stop. And, you know, there's a bunch of other things that we also do that, you know, keep us busy.
But the reality is our most important individuals are our constituents. Right? So if I can listen to people's stories privately about injury, about concerns, about lockdowns, all these kinds of things. And I can advocate on behalf of them for government programs, whether it be a vaccine injury program, which, of course, we wanna talk about as well. Then why can't I do that publicly?
And so, you know, we got a a creeping amount of censorship in our country much like you've experienced in your country already, and I see how you throw at the European Union. And it's that censorship that puts a chill on talking about topics that government doesn't want you to talk about. And so what we found and what Sean has found and what I found is that we can only talk about certain things and other things we're not allowed to talk about. So why is it that I can talk and I can relate to my constituents in the privacy of my office about their injuries and their lack of ability to access government programs. But when I say and I suggest that we should talk about these things publicly, we are, you know, sort of frowned upon or we think that's a difficult topic or it's not encouraged or whatever whatever term you wanna use.
And so I think one of the goals of what, Sean and I would like to accomplish is to give people permission to tell their stories publicly. We and that's really all that we're we're doing during our inquiry. And then we'll we'll answer more questions on the exact inquiry, but, really, what we wanna do is hear people's stories and give them permission to be able to talk amongst their family and their friends and their colleagues to acknowledge that something happened that the government doesn't want you to talk about. And I think, if we could do that, if we could get people talking, if we could get people having conversations, I think that, you know, what we will have done will be a success.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. I mean, think it's fantastic that sitting members of parliament included would be willing to take that approach. You're absolutely right, Dean. I mean, I I have to say that I think it's a it is the right direction to take it in. And and I was I would just say that, you know, the last time I was in Canada, drove down in convoy to Niagara Falls to to the Rainbow Bridge, then there was a big delegation of American patriots came up.
We were there carrying the Canadian flags. I was very honored to to be in part. I was actually asked to speak on the bridge as well. It was very, very patriotic. It was it was nice to see Americans and Canadians coming together as a non Canadian, as a non American to see that that spirit come together in such a powerful way.
So let's go let's go into this in some detail then because you've raised some very, very important points, gentlemen. Hate speech laws in Canada are indeed as as Dina said causing a chilling effect. But, you know, let's let's look at the inquiry for example. What motivated you, Sean, for example, to to to build this up and to take this forward? And now, obviously, getting support from sitting members of parliament.
I mean, that's a big undertaking that you've taken on, but what motivated you to do it?
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, my my primary motivation for all of this is is as far as the COVID nineteen, what we call vaccines, is we're still in Canada jabbing children starting at six months of age. And in my opinion, that is culpable homicide and or, you know, at best, criminal negligence and because these people aren't at risk at all. So my my big motivation is let's stop harming people. But there's in Canada, there are so many people that are harmed by this vaccine. We're we're in a a health crisis, and, you know, I think we're just now starting at the leading edge of of cancer diagnoses going off the chart.
But let's just ignore even cancer. There's just so many people that are injured, and they're not being treated properly because we cannot accept in in Canada that the vaccines caused injury because the official narrative is is that they are safe and effective. And the official narrative is is all of this harm is caused by long COVID. And we've got this group of people in Canada, kind of this middle ground, that believe that because that's what the messaging has been, and and that that messaging is is not correct. I I don't wanna go into the causes of of long COVID and and that, but the reality is is we have a significant number of Canadians that are injured by the vaccine, but we can't admit it yet.
You know, I was on a podcast last week with a medical doctor, Canadian medical doctor, and I said, is it possible, you know, in in July 2026 for a Canadian doctor to speak out publicly against the COVID nineteen vaccine, say it caused harm, and, you know, we should look into this and start addressing actually the real mechanisms of harm. And this doctor said, no. I mean, you'd be professionally disciplined and may lose your right to practice. So these people are suffering, Jim, and they're being denied medical treatments because in Canada, we, we have this we've come to believe that everything needs to be scarce and that the next generation needs to be poor and that we can wait in line, you know, eighteen hours in emergency wards, and we can be denied treatments because those treatments aren't approved for any vaccine injury or anything like that. These people are being denied treatments.
And in my mind, we're that's an ethical problem. These aren't anti vaxxers. These are people you know, like, if if if you wanna be in that crowd where you wanna throw that label that somehow is worse than, you know, being called the leper, these are people that took the vaccine, many not wanting to, but, you know, because they were told to, and they're injured. And how dare we not then, first of all, listen to their stories and acknowledge they're injured, but secondly, take care of them?
Speaker 0: Think any society that turns their back on the most vulnerable, raises very, very serious moral questions as well as others, about the direction of travel. And I think you're right. We must talk about these things. And a lot of people, they were coerced into it. They were duped into it.
I'm I'm gonna ask you before I move on to Dean for a second because I'm always interested. Why is it that some people went along with the narrative and others chose not to despite the fact that they were persecuted, they were sort of even family members were being ostracized in certain circumstances. But employers, others saying this is something you had to do. But before I go to Dean, let me ask you the question, Charlotte. At what point did you know there was something not right?
When did the red flags go up for you? When did you see that there was something just not right about this?
Speaker 2: You know what? And I'll just preface it to say when COVID hit, I mean, I I was already hardwired from past experience not to believe Health Canada because I'm fighting them all the time. I'm I'm seeing that that there's an agenda to basically keep us in chronic illness. So I I didn't have any trust anyway, and I also understood that there's there's two Canadas, much like there'll be, you know, two United Kingdoms. You know, one where just the average citizen lives, and if you're not crossing that line where you become a danger to the establishment, you you don't you don't get that treatment.
But I I was involved in a federal court case where if we succeeded and we're just seeking a declaration saying as a constitutional minimum, surely when you take medications that people need to survive, like, there's no question they're gonna die without it and it's been shipped through the mail, when you seize that, surely as a base bare minimum, you should advise them you've stolen medication that they will die without. But if we had won that because of the fact pattern, it would be very clear that some very high up people within Health Canada, including a a former minister in the government, most probably committed culpable homicide and or criminal negligence causing death. And that's when the telephone started getting, you know, tapped right where they're breaking in and say, hang on. I gotta change the tape, and my office is being broken into, and my house is being broken into, and my phone in the car across the street, and the lug nuts being loosened on your wheels. You have to check them before you are gonna go on the highway.
I'd already had those experiences as had other lawyers. When you cross that that Rubicon. There's a there's a certain line you're not supposed to cross, and they let you know that you've crossed it and please back off. So I was already hardwired. But for me during COVID, you know, the first little bit where the wife and I are watching the news, and I don't know.
I think it was the beginning of the third weekend. They start the news starts talking about vaccine. Well, I'm in the drug approval world. The the pharmaceutical companies have been trying for decades to get a coronavirus vaccine approved because then you'd have public health agencies in all western nations paying for two vaccines, not just one, an influenza strain and a a corona strain. It's just it's a license to print money, but they could never get through the animal studies because, you know, generally speaking, a hundred percent of the animals die.
So I knew then right then it was a fraud. And then, you know, once you start looking, it just it becomes it was astounding. I mean, I Jim, I know you know all about this, but, I mean, it's it's truly you look back, and it's almost unbelievable what happened and how the whole world fell into lockstep.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, I I I remember I I picked up on a lot of these signals. It was a psychological operation. They used fear very successfully to coerce people into doing things that they ordinarily would not have done. Dean, let me come to you then because, you know, you're a member of parliament.
Cast your mind back. When did you start to see things starting to happen that that and did you get pressure? I mean, if you spoke out about those those sort of situations or or raised any concerns, did you get pressure from within the establishment itself as well?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Absolutely. I I remember when, all this was going on within our party, lockdowns, for example. Let's just take lockdowns. I'm a small business person.
Lockdowns are deadly for small business people. Right? You you know, how are you gonna get people out to your restaurant, your small business, your store, your retail, whatever. And so I really had a problem with it, and our leadership at the time said, you know, that's really a provincial issue. You always know you're in trouble.
You know, when politicians start pointing at other levels of government. Right? It's like, kinda like, all these are my constituents. Right? Whether they they don't care if it's you know, I people call me about my garbage.
We all their garbage is not being picked up. That's a local issue, municipal. They don't care. They wanna hear from the elected people to go to bat for them. So there was pressure right from the start.
And, you know, and and my thought process was always, hey. People should have choice. People should never never, be not not allowed to participate in society. And, you know, I had people I had kids calling my office crying. I'm in third year nursing, and I can't continue with my program, which means I can't continue with, you know, with with my career.
What am I going to do? And I'm gonna have to throw out all that time. What am I gonna do to pivot? You know, when I had 55, 60 year old truck drivers that are saying, like, I need to do this, and I've I've had allergic reactions. I mean, I knew that this was cocoa bananas when they wouldn't even recognize exemptions.
Like, people that had actually had adverse reactions to other vaccines. They said, no. We're not gonna do this. You know, we're not gonna do it for religious reasons. There is absolutely zero chances that we could do anything.
So imagine the amount of calls I was taking from small business people, from single mothers. Single mothers during lockdowns in 500 square foot apartments. I don't know what that is in meters. May, square meter, maybe 200, whatever. Small apartments, one bedroom apartments, who were not allowed to take their kids across the street to a park and be outside.
That's insanity. So you look at the plethora of stupid rules, and I always I have always I listen. I've never trusted government to begin with even before I got into it. And I realized there are some good people in there. But, you know, government that says they always have your best interest at heart, I over twenty two years, you can't convince me that happens in every case.
So maybe just, you know may maybe just once in a while, they don't have your interest at heart. You know? And and the reality is is that there's always I always ask the question. The other thing I always ask is, people is to follow the money. I just follow the money.
Where's the money coming from? And who's getting rich off of this? And and then you'll start, you know, asking better questions as far as that goes. So, you know, really to me, the challenge was I wanted to say more. I was, upset by the fact that things did not add up.
And very quickly, we saw this will, you know, this will cause you to not be able to get it. You won't give it. Like, you you're protected. You're protected from other people. Well, once again, the the whole, the whole thought process around a vaccine was that that's there to protect myself.
Right? So the narrative kept changing. So if anyone that was a critical thinker could actually try and follow the bouncing ball, you would realize very quickly that this was a challenge. And, yes, always political pressure. You've been around politics.
You you know that the parties, you know, have an apparatus, and there's always saying we gotta speak, you know, with united front, and we gotta make sure I just I just always you know, as an entrepreneur, I've always questioned everything. Right? And I I question things because that's what you do, as an entrepreneur. This is how you like, you what do you mean it can't be done better? It can't be done differently.
What do mean it's never been done before? So these are just part of the questions of my lexicon, that I like to ask anyways regardless of whether it's politics or not.
Speaker 0: It's interesting because, you know, I often I often speak to people who are former military or or or intelligence or or police and and business. And and we all speak a very similar language. We don't have the luxury of debates in Fanatim. I mean, we have to get on. We have to, you know, turn things around very, very quickly.
And I find that most people that had an early instinct that there was something not right, usually I've I've come from those kind of environments. But when when you hear a lawyer, a respected lawyer like Sean saying, hey, You get warnings to toe the line, to to turn turn it down. The the the lug nuts on your wheels get loosened. It's like they're sending a signal. I mean, where are we going with this when you hear that, Dean?
I mean, that is pretty shocking stuff.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So listen. Ever since Trudeau came in, which I was an unmitigated disaster. Like, was a clown before he got elected. He was a clown while he like, I and he continues not to disappoint on the clown front.
This guy had not a clue what was going on and not a serious person by at all. Ever since COVID and I think it's the same all around the world, Jim. Ever since COVID, the the overreach, the censorship, the everything that goes into I we're not here to talk about digital IDs today. We're talking about legislation that is put before the houses of parliament all over the world with increasing censorship, with an increasing you sort what I sort of say, setting the cage in terms of what we're allowed to do and not allowed to do. What why is it that we're not allowed to challenge government?
Why is it that we're not listen. We all everyone on this call does not support hate speech. Absolutely. I mean, that's a that's a that's a given, and we already have laws around hate speech. But when you take some of these decisions out of the hands of, you know, the legal, you know, judges and what have you, and then start appointing, ad hoc boards and ad hoc committees that now can make those decisions.
And when you see, you know, when you see, different countries spend more time censoring, you know, you hurt my feeling memes as opposed to dealing with real crime, you you start to ask questions about where are we going and where are we heading. So the narrative was set in COVID. You will you will comply, you will listen, and you will not challenge the government. And I have seen literally dozens of pieces of legislation that have been introduced, you know, with Trudeau one, second term of Trudeau. And then as we continue to move on with our new guy, Kearney, I mean, you guys have had the benefit of having Kearney.
You guys know more about him than Canadians. Hey. This guy hasn't even lived in the country for the last number of years. Well, he's got three passports. It's crazy.
So he's just continued along the censorship front. So going back to what was discussed before, the challenge is when you can't raise questions, when you can't challenge the government. I don't care who it is. We're we're in the opposition right now. It's our duty to hold the government to account.
We're doing our job. That's what we're supposed to do. But when you see increasing legislation, when you see increasing legislation that it revolves around censorship, that is a bad place to be in in a country, in a society when you cannot discuss. Pick your topic, a, b, or c. And so this is why for me, after hearing people's stories during COVID and the challenge they had to meet, either to continue with their education or to put food on their table or to be able to see dying parents in a hospital.
These choices were unconscionable in terms of what they were doing to people putting a gun to their head. And so as Shauna said, you know, whether you took the vaccine voluntarily or whether you did it where you were coerced and in some cases threatened, it doesn't matter. These people have stories. Not everyone was injured to the same effect. Not everyone had to deal with the same type of trauma or the same type of injury.
But if you were injured, what is it should the government and not at the very least be willing to listen to your story and hear what you have to say instead of marginalizing you and calling you all kinds of names and saying that you don't matter? These people did what they thought they were required to do in order to participate in society. And the fact that we have not given them the time of day, it it just it irks me beyond that, and I'm hearing these stories from all across the country. I'm hearing them in my emails, voice mails, letters. You you just you pick your pick your topic of the way you wanna communicate, and I think it's time, and I think it's well overdue, that we get a chance to listen to some of their stories.
Speaker 0: You know, I've interviewed many people from Canada and other places around the world who were COVID vaccine injured, no question of it. I've spoken to many professors, epidemiologists, virologists, doctors, people of renown who are saying, look, there is something seriously very wrong with the whole thing. I I I did look at the 1918 Spanish flu many many years ago. I studied what had happened there and I had a natural interest in it. But the lockdowns were devastating for for businesses.
I mean, all all in. And a lot of people made a lot of money out of it. But, Sean, it's it's coming back to yourself for a a moment. If if they're so sure of themselves and it being so safe and effective, you would think that they would be able to counter the opposite views or the opposite narrative if they're so sure about their own position on it. But they don't appear to be and haven't been, for for some time, but instead what they're doing is they're imposing legislation or putting in legislation together that actually closes down that debate.
How complicit, Sean, are they in the media in Canada right now as far as that's all concerned?
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, Jim, none of this could happen without the media. And so your viewers in The United Kingdom understand is it's likely that the Canadian media is the most controlled and most homogeneous in having the government message. So one of our major broadcasters, the CBC, it's actually it's a government broadcaster. And, you know, the irony is is a lot of Canadians totally trust them because in the past, they built trust by actually mimicking journalism. And it might have been true germ journalism, but we also fund the other major networks.
So it's you know, I don't know the numbers, but it's very possible that the Canadian government is the largest contributor to the other major networks and then add in pharmaceutical advertising. And, you know, we can go back to, you know, manufacturing consent by Noam Chomsky. The media is is reasonably affected, and editorial boards are reasonably affected by those that are funding them. And and there are well known mechanisms for this. But it's so gotten out of hand, but but they have a narrative problem, Jim.
They have they have a huge narrative problem, and and here's why we have to have the discussion in Canada. It's why you have to have the discussion in you in The UK. It's why every country does. You know, in, September 2025, Rasmussen did a poll in The United States that found that fifty six point six percent of Americans believe that the COVID nineteen vaccines caused, listen to the qualifier here, serious death. So not death, not do you know somebody your aunt Martha know somebody who knows somebody that died?
We have over half of Americans back in September, which, you know, now in our time frame is a lot of time because we've got all of these injuries growing, that's believed the COVID nineteen's caused serious harm. We don't have such a survey in Canada, and I'm assuming, though, the numbers are very similar. Well, what's the percentage of Canadians, of Americans, of people in The United Kingdom that not only believe that the vaccines cause serious death, but also believe that cause serious injury? It's it's, you know, it's well over half. Well, how do you restore trust in public health?
I mean, you've got you've got a subset of this population believing that this was a deliberate thing or in the very least, you know, bordering on criminal recklessness on how things happened. And, I mean, the reality is we all live in a bubble, we, you know, we can think different things. But you've got well over half of the the populace that believes that there was injury caused and death caused by an intervention that was completely promoted and shoved down our throats by our governments. We you can't restore public health until we have this conversation. So, I mean, leaving aside that ethically, what we're doing is is completely morally wrong.
We are terrorizing and allowing to suffer and die. And and in Canada, we pushed assisted suicide. It might now be our leading cause of death. No one knows because doctors can't even you know, in our largest province, we'll get disciplined if they even put that as a cause of death on the death certificate. But we've got people dying.
We've got people suffering. We're not taking care of them. And back to the the mainstream media is none of this could happen without the mainstream media. And the pushback to Dean has, you know, just been vicious. You know, how dare you promote vaccine hesitancy and, you know, where were you when I was saving lives in the emergency ward, etcetera.
Well, there's already vaccine hesitancy. You know, we had a blood scandal in Canada where our blood supply years ago was, not being screened properly, and people were getting things like hepatitis c and other conditions. And we refused to have the conversation, and so we had basically, the whole nation became unwilling to receive blood and I think even donate blood. And until we had that conversation and they said, oh, yes. Actually, we have a problem, and then we fixed the problem, we couldn't restore confidence.
Well, that's where we are with these with these COVID nineteen vaccines. We have to we have to have an honest conversation, figure out together, you know, what happened, fix the mistakes, and then go on. And until that happens, we're gonna be hopelessly divided.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I I mean, it's it's shocking. I I remember when I first heard about the MAID service. This is assisted suicide. Shocked me.
People that were injured through the vaccine being offered this, instead of, you know, traditional support, financial support, whatever it might be, no. They were offered assisted suicide. I find the whole thing quite stomach churning. And military veterans that that were injured as well, a lot of them were once again offered this this maid service. To the point where we've been having debates in parliament here in The United Kingdom about the same type of thing.
And I know that Australia have been having that conversations there in their government too. So, you know, it is shocking. And I I am deeply much very much against it because I can see all sorts of reasons why that is the wrong path to go down. If I could come to you then, Dean, as a sitting member of parliament, what's your view on on MAID? Why do you think it was passed the way it was?
Do you think there's any possibility that a a conservative government might revoke some of that legislation or just do away with it altogether?
Speaker 1: Well, definitely. And as a matter of fact, number of our members, conservative members of parliament have actually introduced private members bills. Our concern was always, you know, it started as an irrefutable and imminent. Right? So you had a incurable disease, and your the death was was going to be around the corner.
And, you know, there's there's some reasoning to say maybe that's humane, and that's that's probably unacceptable level. But the challenge was was that we were always concerned about the guardrails and that we just continue to expand it. It's been out of control. I mean, we've gone from that, and then we continue you know? And even even the process, it was, like, two weeks to think about it.
Two doctors, and now we're down to, you know, one doctor in, know, twenty four hour yeah. The the guardrails continue. And and so the challenge is, as you mentioned, we have veterans that show up that are dealing with poverty issues. So not not even talking about injuries. We're talking about people that fought, bled, and were injured for our country.
And they show up to say, we need help financially, and they're offered made. They're offered medical assistance in dying. Think about that for one second. What kind of society goes to, go to point of, you know, we will just offer you an easy way out, and we'll save our health care, which had totally mismanaged as well. That's a conversation for another day.
And so, we've always wanted to bring things back and and limit they're talking about mental illness. They're talking about, you know, reducing the age. So, you know, what what I find very difficult is what happens to those who are most vulnerable? So our seniors in nursing homes, how about our disabled in group homes? How about our teens that struggle with a plethora of mental health challenges?
I mean, as we were all teenagers once, you know, if things were not always rosy, which we struggled with, you know, this, that, or the other thing. And we realized in time, oh, you know what? This too this too will pass. And so we the last thing you wanna do is is when someone's vulnerable and struggling, to offer them something like this. And so we would most definitely roll back some of these things around me.
And I think, you know, we've had over a 100,000 people that have used this already. Sean indicated it's one of the leading. It's not the leading cause of death, but it's growing. And as a percentage, we are we're doing far worse in even places like Holland, The Netherlands that have a pretty liberal policy around, physician assisted in dying or, like I said, we call it MAID, because it's called different names everywhere. California, which is a lefty state and and very, you know, progressive on some of these issues, we're actually outpacing them as well.
So when we look at these kinds of things, we realize this is not good. There was a a paper that was done, a research paper, a number of, a number of months ago that came out and showed that, you know, potentially, as we lead into post 2035, post 2037, the savings to the health care system. So once again, follow the money. Follow the money. Could be in the trillions of dollars.
And so if you think about offering people made for any reason, and I think it's un unconscionable that people that have been injured through no fault of their own from vaccines are being offered this as as a solution for for a system that was supposed to take care of them, and they were only doing what they thought was the right thing to do. So, you know, if you look at you start to connect all the dots, which is I know, what, you know, what what certainly, I look at. It's the money thing. It's a failing health care system and a whole plethora of issues. You know, maybe it's not one in particular.
But when you add them all up, you see why they're doing what they're doing and trying to save money on the backs of, Canadians, or wherever this is offered around the world. And I think that's that's reprehensible.
Speaker 0: Absolutely agree. You know, when I was last in, Canada actually, wasn't the last time. It was I was the one of the times I was thinking I went to Ottawa. I met, a fellow called Eddie Cornell. He's a great Canadian patriot.
He was one of the founders for Veterans for Freedom Canada. And I started working with him and and and his colleagues and drawing awareness to a lot of the things that were going on with the vaccine injured, in particular, those who military veterans. In fact, one of the highest honors I've ever received was to be made an honorary member of Veterans for Freedom Canada. And, you know, got a lovely letter from from Eddie and his his colleagues, and they're doing some amazing work. If you haven't linked up with Eddie Cornell, would highly recommend it because he's a very, smart guy and really knows what he's talking about.
But I want to ask you, if I can back to Sean just for a moment, first of all, before I ask you this question, let me tell you something. I don't know if you guys are aware of this, but but people in The UK are. When we had our prime minister, Richie Sunek, installed, because he wasn't never he was never voted in, he was installed after a lot of strange activity going on there. And it turned out that a Guardian newspaper investigative journalist had found out that back in 2017, he had invested $500,000,000, that's $500,000,000 of his own personal fortune, he's a very wealthy guy, Richie Sinnick, into none other than Moderna, who up until that point had never had a successful product to market. This is back in 2017.
And then he was questioned about it, you know, obviously when the pandemic struck, said, oh, it was just good luck on my part. Well, who'd invest $500,000,000 into a company that's never had any successful products to market to that extent. I don't know. Let let me ask you first of all, Sean, were you were you aware of that? Did you know about that?
Speaker 2: No. No. I had no idea, and it it's kind of curious you're saying that. And I don't know if it's true, but I recall that there were allegations going around that Justin Trudeau had also invested in Moderna. I could be completely wrong with that or had somehow been involved in that that process in a financial way.
But, no, that's a shocking conflict of interest, isn't it? There's Well, I mean there's no way unless he knew something.
Speaker 0: Right. And and I think this is what caught a lot of people's attention. I mean, Dean, $500,000,000 into a company that's never had a successful product to market and then to compound it further when he did become prime minister, he allowed Moderna to set up contracts within The United Kingdom worth billions. And of course, would have made a great deal of money off the back of his investment in that as well. And by the way, this was set up in the Cayman Islands through a shell company that he helped create called Thelene Partners.
So there was a lot I mean, I'm not I'm not a fan of The Guardian newspaper, but in this case, deserve they a bit of praise because that journalist, that investigative reporter, exposed something that I think was right to the heart of what we witnessed over that whole COVID era. And maybe I'll just come back to you to you just very briefly, Dean. I mean, had you heard about British Synod, the the former British prime minister, having made that kind of investment? Is that something you heard about in Canada?
Speaker 1: I I've heard of of of some over the time. Like, you know, you read the stories at the time. You know, I I he almost sounds like he he's had the kind of luck that Nancy Pelosi has had in The States with her investment portfolio. You know, it's incredible that some of these politicians that have insider information and are unable to trade on it. It just blows me away that this actually happens in United States.
And that that not only do they outpace the market, they outpace any of the top performing fund managers as well. You know, once again, you know, Jim, I always tell people, follow the money. Find out where people are going, what they're doing, and, you know, can you imagine, like, you know, if he was worth a billion dollars? I I like I said, I don't I I I was aware that he was a wealthy individual, etcetera, etcetera, at the time. But, you know, can you imagine putting that kind of bet, like, on anything?
Like, like, you would have to be pretty sure. So I would say I would I would take it one step further and say that's not only incredibly great luck. Like like, I you know, this he should he should give up politics. Well, I know he's he's not involved anymore. And just go into fund fund management because to put that amount of money on the on on one on one particular stock, I, you know, I I I don't think lucky even become begins to describe what that is.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And I'd say no years before. Of of course, can't.
Speaker 1: Many years before. Right?
Speaker 2: I I just I you know, I'm just the word accountability is is screaming at me. You know? So how is it possible? Because you're describing something that happens in Canada also. We, you know, we could talk about engineering firms and our prime minister and the like.
But, Jim, how is it that, you know, like, Britain spawned a bunch of West what we call western liberal democracies. And in every single one of them, in and in Britain itself, there's no accountability. How is it possible that a prime minister of The United Kingdom could have a financial interest in a company that then is profiting during, you know, what we're told is is this big crisis and not be able to have to step down or at least be a 100% insulated, which would require it being outside of cabinet's purview to be making these decisions. And there's never any accountability. There's never any investigation, and we could go on and on.
And it's it's why we have rot in our institutions. If we listen. You get into office now, you know you can act criminally. You know that you can you can have glaring conflicts of interest, and you will profit by it because our justice system will not investigate you. You will you know, our parliaments will not kick you out and and censure you.
You basically have a free ride. Now the the reason that is is because the citizens are tolerating it, and this is part of a wider problem. You know, if I can just, like, go religious on you, but I just I feel I have to, is is The United Kingdom was founded on Christian principles. Canada was founded on Christian principles, and and that required honesty and it required personal accountability of every member of society, not just our leaders. And we stepped away from that.
And we have to get back to that because society collapses when we get into this moral relativism where it's okay for a prime minister to be profiting, you know, incredible amounts during a pandemic when their government is basically probably censuring any information for alternative treatments and everyone's being railroaded into this. I mean, that it's out it's outrageous. You know, we're talking about MAID. When the Supreme Court of Canada allowed that, and and there had been attempts before with really egregious fact patterns where, you know, your heart's bleeding for the person, and the court says, no. We can't allow this.
We've got this sanctity of life, which was a Christian principle that was embedded in our legal system that you could it was a line you couldn't cross. And when they finally said in another hard luck case, yeah, we'll allow this, the legal community thought we might have two a year. And the real problem is is this is just a symptom of us abandoning hard and fast principles such as the sanctity of life, which doesn't allow this. Because as soon as we abolish these principles, we go into awful places. And and the other thing, and I invite anyone in your audience to share with me, how we murder people in Canada with, you know, government assisted suicide.
I because I just thought when we allowed it that we just give them a morphine overdose. You know, if somebody's, like, in their last hour or something in a a hospice, you know, we all kinda know that that they might be given a little too much morphine to kind of help that process along. And I thought that's what we were doing because it's cheap, and you know it they're not gonna suffer. They're just gonna go to sleep, and the respiration's gonna stop. No.
What we do is we give you a drug that paralyzes you. So you can't do anything. You can't blink. You can't speak. And then we give you a drug where you basically it causes you to drown in your lungs.
So your your your lungs fill up with fluid. The question I have for your audience, because I don't know the answer and no one can tell me the answer in Canada, is are some of us aware when this is happening? Like, we're paralyzed, but are we aware that we're slowly drowning?
Speaker 0: I mean, it's a nightmare. I I don't I'm not a medical professional, but I have spoken to people that say, it's incredibly painful as well. Yet, as you say, the people are paralyzed. They can't speak. They can't move.
They can't do anything. What a dreadful dreadful way to go. What kind of government would sanction that kind of process? And then and not just sanction it, but actively encourage it. Yeah.
I mean, let me let me come to you, Dean Dean, for one second because one of the times that I was I was speaking to Canadians about this, at that point, they were talking about passing legislation that would have allowed the maid service to be given to young people or or even children. And do you know if that passed, or is that still on the the cards to be voted on? And what's your thoughts on that?
Speaker 1: Oh, you know, completely unacceptable. Right? You know? And and I could get into a whole bunch of other topics that I won't, that I could get in trouble on when when it deals with how and what we allow young people to do. So, you know, I I think that, first off, you know, young people should be protected at all costs.
They don't understand the consequences. They they're in a period of time where they they think that nothing can ever get better, so they don't understand the context. The life is full of ups and downs. And let's be honest. The last number of years, we we put our kids in a bubble, and we bubble wrap them, and we give them participation trophies.
And things are different than when my parents grew up and were you know, they my parents came, you know, like, most most people in Canada came from Western Europe. You know, my people that came from Ireland and and England and Scotland, like, all these places, you know, two hundred years ago. And they they weren't put on some kind of welfare program, and now governments put everyone on welfare for they came to contribute. They were given land. They worked so hard, etcetera, etcetera.
So this is completely unacceptable. We're trying to I there has been, some discussion about trying to roll back some of the things. But but right now, we've gone way too far, and we need and by the way, any any discussion we have to even hold the line is not good enough. We need to roll it back even further. Kids are not in a position to make any kind of decisions around things that will affect the rest of their life.
In this case, would end their life. And I think that, you know, what we have to get back to is the fact that, you know, we talk about personal responsibility, and I know we're on we're this we're on the show to talk about personal responsibility, but whatever happened. Right? Our countries were founded on Judeo Christian principles. Right?
And part of that is personal responsibility. And so there are a number of things that we need to do. And I think, you know, when we start looking at passing laws to try and fix problems that we've created, maybe we should take a step back and figure out, you know, what what I'm always worried about when we pass legislation is the law of unintended consequences. How many times do you see governments around the world pass one piece of legislation that is supposed to affect one issue and has got a catastrophic effect in something else that didn't even consider? And so I think that's the, that's the the point.
I take the sort of the the approach that we should try to do no harm. Although that's not, you know, that's not what we're dealing with a lot of times when it comes to legislation. I think that that's the challenge. Right? That we've gotta do a better job on those things.
We've gotta defend the people that need to be defended. We have gotta be a voice for the voiceless. That is why Sean and I are undertaking this. These people do not have a voice. They don't have a voice, and they've been even made to feel guilty and ostracized and put away and said, no.
You don't you shouldn't talk about it. You should suck it up. And by the way, if it gets too bad, we'll offer you assisted assistance in dying. Right? MAID is what we call it in Canada.
And even we changed the name to make it sound better, more pleasant, etcetera, etcetera. And I think it's so important that we give these people a voice. Their voices need to be heard, and we we really believe if, we can give, these people that have been vaccine injured a voice, then that we can begin to start the healing process, not only in their lives, but in the maybe their family's lives, maybe the community, but certainly in this country. As has been said, we don't trust institutions like we should. And, you know, there was a time and place where they were created.
I know why they've been created is to be able to do the right thing, but that is not the case anymore. And quite frankly, we need to make sure that people can heal from what's happened. And part of that is being able to talk about these things publicly.
Speaker 0: Absolutely right. I mean, we are approaching this has gone past all too quickly. I I have a big interest in Canada. I've been there many times. I know great people there.
And I have to say I'm delighted to have you both on, maybe a bit there is something that I'd like to ask you that that isn't so much COVID related, but it is to do with Alberta. The province of Alberta, there is talk about the potential for them to to potentially declare independence or at least to have a a democratic vote on on separation. Maybe I'll start with yourself, Sean. Do do you have any thoughts on that? Do you think it's gonna happen?
What do you think the premier is gonna do? Do think she's gonna allow it? And if they don't allow it, where does it go from there? But start with yourself first of all, Sean.
Speaker 1: You're you're you're muted, John.
Speaker 2: Sorry. No, Jim. I do I do wanna talk about that, and I live in Alberta, so I've I've got some things to say, but I first wanna just briefly talk about the Allison inquiry so that people understand. So, you know, you see Dean's last name Allison. So just, you know, do an Internet search, allisoninquiry.com.
So what what Dean has has agreed to do as a as an MP, and this isn't a government initiative, it's not a conservative party initiative, he's just decided I'm going to formally so it's gonna happen on Parliament Hill in a committee room, and and all other MPs are invited. So MPs are gonna have the opportunity to formally listen to vaccine injured persons tell their stories. Now we're not allowed to do this. I mean, by the mainstream media and that, we're not supposed to have this conversation. And it it it could be the icebreaker.
It could this has already so resonated on social media that people that believe the vaccines, you know, saved lives, that believe that all of these injuries are long COVID and don't accept, wait a second, a large part of these injuries are vaccine injured. They're now having this conversation even if it's in disbelief for the first time. And so this this inquiry could be groundbreaking around the world, and people around the world are gonna be watching it. So here in Canada, on Parliament Hill, we are gonna have MPs having that conversation for the first time, an honest conversation where they're they're interacting with vaccine injured persons, asking them questions, listening to their stories. So I just you know, I wanted to make sure everyone knew, and they can go to Allison inquiry.
I'm also gonna ask ask if your audience would help donate to support this. It's like, I'm volunteering. This is being set up by volunteers, but MPs in Canada are not given a budget to do this. So we're actually having to fundraise by the public, and our major cost is flying vaccine injured witnesses and housing them. And some of them have to travel a couple of days before because they're too sick.
They have to recover. So we desperately need funds to be able to get the vaccine injured persons who need to tell their stories, and the world needs to hear them. So I just wanted to to say that first because it's so important that your audience understands what member
Speaker 0: our community Before we we go on to the other part, where can people donate to? Is there like a Yeah.
Speaker 2: So if you if you search alisoninquiry.com, you're actually gonna get you know, it's gonna come up as Alison Inquiry, but the the web address is actually COVID testimony. We just set up a not for profit converse corporation to take funds and disperse funds. So, the yeah. And there's a donate page. And so, you know, thank you for asking that question.
So please just go to alison inquiry or, you know, covidtestimony.com, and there's a donate tab and donate. Because we're I'm we're at the stage where we're now contacting the witnesses, and I'm having to ask them, is there any way you can cover your own travel costs? And and, you know, we know that many can't. Some can and many can't, but we shouldn't even be having that conversation. Many of them are afraid to testify.
Many of them fear that there's gonna be consequences. All of them will suffer physically for doing this, and the fact that we can't just take care of that, I'm embarrassed, actually. So so yeah. So thank you for letting me get that out of the way, Jim. I think that's you know, this this is a a conversation we haven't been allowed to have in Canada.
Members of parliament have been reluctant to have the conversation, and the mainstream media has an interest in not having this conversation, in continuing the government narrative for several reasons. A, that's what their their funders want. So the pharmaceutical company and the Canadian government, their major funders, do not want this conversation. But the risk they run is is that they're like, public trust in the mainstream media is already at an all time low. I I truly hope they understand that we have to now have this conversation.
Like, I'm sure they've they've had these conversations. How long can we kick the can down the road? Hoping it will be forever. But the world needs to the world needs to start listening to these stories because if we listen to each other, even if we disagree, there's something about listening to other people share their experience, their lives, and and this is this is gonna change our lives, full stop. And and maybe while we're still on that topic, I'll let Dean speak, and then I'll answer your Alberta question.
Speaker 0: Absolutely, Dean. Truly, there is unity and strength in unity, isn't there? I mean, unity is strength. And and just to to add maybe add to what Sean has said, maybe would you like to say a few words on that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. I like I said, you know, the the biggest challenge I've seen is that, people feel alone. And, you know, because they're not allowed to talk about it publicly, what happens is is that you could have, like, two neighbors that have had two different experiences, but because you we've not gonna give them permission to talk about it publicly. Like, I'm not talking to we're doing a public forum.
But even, like, it's been frowned upon, even have these conversations. Like, it's like a a dirty little secret, and somehow you're to blame. What we're really hoping will happen is that people will realize that they're not alone. And they'll they'll come out and say, you know what? I thought it was just me.
I had no idea. And as Sean has mentioned before, well, how do you think we can get healing? How do you think we could actually I had a guy come up to me at a we just celebrated our hundredth anniversary for our legion, our Royal Canadian Legion, a hundred years. And I had a gentleman came up to me. He was in my my office, you know, fifteen years ago.
And he said, Dean, I I was injured, and I've been to the doctor. I got joint pain, and the doctor doesn't know what to do. Like, he they keep prescribing. They they they don't know how to handle it. And so part of the reason we want discussions is that people could have conversations and then figure out, well, what may have worked for a, b, or c, disease, etcetera, doesn't necessarily work for a vaccine injury.
But if you can't have the conversation, how are you ever gonna come up with a cure? Right? So we don't have a cure, and we don't have conversations, which means that we'll just offer offer you death. Wow. That is completely unacceptable.
And so I think we really want the conversation to to happen, a, because we want people not to feel alone, b, because we wanna see healing, but but, c, because we wanna we want conversation to evolve to a point where people can actually try and reduce some of the issues that they've had as a result of the of of of their injuries. So quite frankly, they weren't sure because the doctors wouldn't acknowledge or even have a conversation, which further frustrates people, as they try to figure out what's wrong and how can I get help?
Speaker 0: Incredible. Incredible.
Speaker 2: Can can I can I talk about this thing? Jim, can I just give you another example? Because, you know, the the if the issue of neighbors came up and and how we've been so divided, and it ties into censorship because censorship divides us. We can't actually know what other people think, so then we can't understand them. So and and COVID is the perfect thing.
You know? We were all UK, Canada divided, vaccinated, unvaccinated. In fact, we came to hate each other. Well, let's say you've got two neighbors. One that was, you know, I'm against the vaccine and the other that was pro vaccine, and they hate each other.
Now if they were actually allowed to listen to each other's story, they would come to understand they had the exact same experience. And listen carefully. They had the exact same experience. They just believed different things. And I'm totally generalizing, but the vaccine, you know, pro vaxx person could honestly say to their neighbor, you know, I believed that there was this dangerous pathogen that actually could kill me, could kill my kids, and I'm terrified.
I'm I'm I am terrified by this, but there's this solution. There's this vaccine. And so we could all be safe. If only if only you would have taken it. You live right beside me, and I'm being told that I'm unsafe and my children are unsafe.
Of course, I'm mad at you. Of course I hate you. It's become the anger and hate. Now the the unvaccinated person gets to share their story and says, you know, during that that thing, I honestly believed that the vaccine posed a mortal threat to me and my kids. Well, no problem because in The UK and Canada, you don't have to take a treatment you don't wanna take.
Oh, no. Wait a second. We've got the government and we've got the pro vaxxers like you. We we can't go to our kids' hockey game. We can't go to restaurants.
We can't work. We can't pay our mortgage. We're being we can't go to Christmas dinners. I mean, the social pressure, everything. I can't send my kids to school because they're gonna get vaccinated, and the teachers are gonna tell the kids not to tell me, the parent.
So I would be safe if only it was for you, my neighbor. And, of course, I was scared of you. And, of course and now it became angry and hatred. Well, now they've just shared this. Can they continue to hate each other?
They've had the exact same experience because we're human beings. They divide us by by preventing us from actually having these conversations, and they are able to manipulate us with fear and all of that because we all react the same. We're human beings, and we have to understand we're the same. And we have to understand that, you know, those people, how are they acting that way? Because in what they believe, that makes perfect sense, and you would act that way too.
Like, we have to understand we're the same. We were all in this together. It was all traumatizing. My gosh. Don't separate us with censorship, then we can never come to understand and forgive and come together and love again.
We have to share the stories, and and this is you know, member of parliament, Dean Anderson, is stepping out here and doing what Mhmm. Nobody in Canada has done and said, I want members of parliament to have the opportunity to listen to stories, and that's gonna change lives.
Speaker 0: Powerful words, Sean. I have to say what what I'd be very keen to see is the likes of Dean to take over as premier of, prime minister of Canada. I think that was is what would give the the real leadership that's necessary. How would you feel about that, Dean? Would is that something you'd ever rule out, or or would you consider doing it if that ever became a possibility?
Speaker 1: No. I have seen what leaders endure and go through. You know, even the bad leaders are really well, I tell you what a what a life. Oh my goodness. You know, I look at how hard they work.
I look at how hard our current leader works right now, and I think, my goodness. You know, there are many sacrifices made in public life. And, you know, I've made sacrifice. We all make sacrifice. Right?
We work. We have jobs. We're away from our families. But I think the so I I look at ministers, and the and the requirement is that much more than MPs. The prime minister, that much more than ministers.
It it's an incredible, incredible commitment. And I well, I appreciate the role, and I appreciate the job and the responsibilities. We're gonna leave that to other people. But I love to be supportive. I'm I'm happy to be supportive.
I
Speaker 0: would just say that's the kind of answer that should signal to people in Canada that you are the right person for that particular role. Never rule things out. Alright, gentlemen. We've got a little bit over time, but I've really enjoyed But I am curious a little bit about your positions on Alberta. I know we're deviating ever so slightly.
Okay. But but I'm gonna get your thoughts, Sean and Dean, about that, and then we're gonna go and give you both the last and final word to do. Say whatever you wanna say. So, Sean, you you stay in Little Alberta. What are you hearing there?
Do you think this referendum is gonna happen?
Speaker 2: Okay. So first of all is is so people in The UK and actually even people in Canada won't understand the Alberta experience. So we're this crazy huge country. Like, for me to drive to Ottawa, you know, even, like, twelve hour days is probably a four day four or five day one way commitment. Just so you understand the, excuse me, the distances involved.
So Alberta has been oil rich, and we've we've got a couple of things that happens. So back, you know, in the nineteen seventy three oil crisis, price of oil is shooting through the roof. Alberta's just going gangbusters, and the actually, Trudeau government, so it was Pierre Trudeau, steps in and imposes what was called a national energy policy saying, no. No. No.
You're not selling to the rest of Canada at world prices. We're, you know, basically controlling costs within Canada. And Alberta just tanked. Like, businesses went out of business overnight. The oil patch just died, and it created a lot of anger.
And then over the years, we've got what's called equalization. And, you know what? And, you know, I I'm I'm gonna be poking some sacred cows here by asking some questions. But so the idea is is, well, the federal government will pull money from those parts of Canada that are generating more income and and give it to the poorer parts of Canada so that there can kind of be a base level of services across the nation. Now, you know, if you have a couple of provinces that, you know, are not productive and they're uneconomic, If you're not interfering, then what might happen is is people might go, you know, there's actually not economic activity here, and maybe I should I have the the choice.
We have freedom of mobility. Maybe I'll move to parts of Canada, you know, that are booming or or just actually more reasonable places to live. We just ended up here by historical accident or whatever, and just let people decide. But we've decided not to do that. Well, Alberta, I don't know what the figure is, but we're you know, it's hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars that have been sucked out mainly to the East, and it never comes back.
You know, my my spouse has the experience where she was a, you know, struggling single mom who, you know, had to hold down several jobs and didn't have day care. But in the province of Quebec, which is receiving most of Alberta's money, she would have day care paid for by the the government. Well, with Alberta money. Well, you know, that goes on for decades, and you kinda get angry about it. Right?
So and then I think COVID was the last straw where there was so much federal government overreach with this that those people that viewed this as, wait a second, you're you are so intruding on our rights and freedoms, that it it's ignited that movement again. So will there be a referendum? I don't know. That's above my pay grade. Is there a sizable number of people in Alberta that would like to separate and become a separate country?
Absolutely, there are.
Speaker 0: Interesting indeed. And and the same question to yourself then, Dean. And very interested to hear your views as a sitting member of parliament, what you think about the whole scenario of Alberta, the province of Alberta potentially, seceding from Ottawa. What's your thoughts on that?
Speaker 1: There's a couple of things. It'll come as no surprise. I would I love them to stay. And maybe it'll come as a surprise for someone from the East, but I completely agree that, their love of frustration there is because they have not been allowed to develop their god given assets and resources. And quite frankly, you know, we are so stupid as a country not to do that.
You know, if any country could have the kind of resources that we have and and critical minerals, oil, gas, and and and, the list goes on and on, We have been absolutely insane not to develop those. So I understand the level of frustration. First of all, we've handcuffed our our good friends in Alberta. The second thing is and the I'm I'm I'm I don't wanna oversimplify it because there's more to it. The second thing is, of the the two major points I just wanna mention and our other underlying things is that, you know, they need to be able to develop the resources because we have manufacturing in Ontario that actually feeds into that.
If, you know, if the oil sands are doing well we have our manufacturers are doing well because we're selling. They're providing goods and services to them. And then the second thing is the whole question of equalization. I've heard it over and go over again from my friends. I got many dear friends in Alberta.
Like, we should let be having a conversation. And the federal government said we're not even gonna have a conversation. So back to Sean's point is that years ago, we actually screwed screwed you over in terms of your resource development, and then we took all your money. So, like, why wouldn't you be upset? You know, I think it's actually ridiculous that you wouldn't entertain those two questions.
Now there could be other things underlying there, but we've gotta make sure they're the economic engine of our country. I love my colleagues from Alberta. I love Albertans. I got family members that live there, but we gotta allow them to develop the resources, which in turn is better for all Canada. And I think to say, you know what?
Over time, we don't wanna look at the equalization. That's what we call the redistribution of wealth. Right? That's what we call welfare for the for for the federal government is, taking money and giving it to other provinces. And Ontario, by the way, has been on the receiving end of that.
Currently, we're we're not receiving that much, but we have definitely been there, over time. So I think if those two, issues were addressed, we could bring the temperature down way, way down, and it's really just being respectful. And I think that, I can sense their frustrations. I can understand completely where they're coming from. But my thought is we're much stronger if we have them in the in the country, but I understand why they're why they're upset.
Speaker 0: Well, that's a great answer, Dean. I think it will be appreciated by people on all sides of the argument. We we are gonna have to look at wrapping it up. As I said to you even before we went to recording, I'm gonna give you both the opportunity to say the the last and final word. I'm gonna start with yourself, Sean, if I might, first of all, and then we'll cross over to Dean.
So, Sean, floor is yours.
Speaker 2: Okay. So Dean gets to be Mark Anthony, but thankfully, we're
Speaker 0: on the same page.
Speaker 2: So I I wanna go back to the Alison inquiry and and really encourage everyone to go to it. It's going to be live broadcast from Parliament Hill on September eighth, ninth, tenth, and eleventh. Put it in your calendar. So it doesn't matter what country you're in. This is going to be life changing.
And I promise you, you watch this inquiry. You will never be the same. It'll be like you've stepped through a door, and then you look behind you and realize that door is locked and you can't go back. To thinking the way you were thinking before. And even though this is gonna be held in Canada, I mean, it's in front of our members of parliament, and they're going to be listening, they're going to be questioning, they're going to be engaging with these people.
It's going to change things. And I think it's meant to change things across the world where all of a sudden doctors don't have to be afraid to have this conversation anymore, where we can because it's not just Canada where you'll have over half the population believing that this intervention caused harm. So why can't we say, oh, we may have got it wrong. Well, so we have this dialogue. All that's gonna happen is is we will be divided and weakened.
And if we actually do find ourselves in a situation where we legitimately need to have confidence in public health, it's not gonna be there in any country. How does that make any of us better off? And, you know, and the skepticism about public health is warranted. And once we have that discussion, we'll understand that, and we'll make changes, and and we'll all be stronger. We'll be united as a polity again, and we will be we will have institutions that serve us again.
There is no downside here. But because there are so many people injured and because there are so many people that believe it's caused by the vaccine, no country can avoid this. So it's as uncomfortable as it's going to be for sitting governments, those that were in power during COVID to have this conversation, it can't be avoided. So, I mean, I'm just now speaking to those MPs and and government officials around the world. Let's have the conversation now.
The sooner, the better because so many are suffering that don't need to be suffering. If we can identify vaccine injury as vaccine injury, there are different protocols, there are different approaches, and we can become proud of how we're treating these people instead of ashamed.
Speaker 0: Well, thanks very much indeed, Sean. I mean, those are very powerful words. I concur with them 100%, and I think you're absolutely spot on in terms of all of that. You know, it sometimes surprises people to know that we are truly an international channel. We're watched by hundreds of thousands of people in The United States, all across North Canada, including Canada, but actually Europe, Australia, New Zealand, all around the world.
So that message, that very important words that you put out there will be seen by a lot of people. I think a lot of people that watch this show will be very much in support of what you're trying to do. Dean, over to yourself then for the last and final word from yourself as well, and the floor is yours.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And so I just wanna start off by saying, Jim, thanks for having us on today. We really do appreciate an opportunity to talk to some of your viewers, and I I hope you come back to Canada soon and we get a chance to, see you you see you on our the our side of the pond. I I do make, trips over to The UK, so maybe I'll look you up next time. I'm I'm over there as well for various parliamentary delegations, etcetera.
Listen. Two things I really like to see happen here. I hope this facilitates and starts a conversation, a broader conversation that we can have publicly. Once again, I'll say it. When Sean came to my office about natural health products back in October, I said, I've got this idea that I I need help with.
I I really think we need to listen to people and to hear the stories. So I want to make sure, and we we both agree on this, that we give people permission to publicly, you know, talk about their issues. And I hope that ignites a dialogue that will not stop, that will it'll set it on fire in terms of its ability to have conversations. The second thing I hope we can do is recognize that we we're not the ones that said these people are vaccine injured. The government itself admitted to that because of a vaccine injury program.
They started a program, and according to government numbers, some sixty thousand are injured, some eleven thousand seriously, thirty five hundred entered into a program, three thousand were accepted. Only two hundred and fifty two people out of potentially sixty thousand. And we know the number is really low, right, because of all the things we talked about for the last hour. 252 people have been compensated. That is point four of a percent of the numbers the government admits.
So I really hope the government wakes up and comes up with a better program. The program that they had was a third party run by this company called Oxero. $55,000,000, which, by the way, is chump change when we look at the kind of money we spend on climate finance, etcetera, etcetera, around the world. 55,000,000, of which 35 went to overhead. Think about that for one second.
One third of the money they committed went to vaccine injured people. So what I hope happens is that we start a conversation that continues to grow. And as Sean said, goes around the world. We're gonna have this conversation. We'll keep having it so that we can make sure that we do a better job next time.
And I really hope that it's not the end, but it's just the beginning of more conversations, longer conversations. But we are only as good as our electorate. The elect people elect people that make decisions based on that, and if they don't see this as important, then it's kinda hard to see where governments would wanna continue. There's been many investigations around the world, good, bad, and different. The UK's done it.
The US is doing it. 30 countries, OECD, g seven, Commonwealth countries, and we've done nothing in this country. So could we talk about a lot of other things? Oh, yeah. We could.
But quite frankly, that that those are more complicated, longer discussions, more funding required. As Sean said, this is all gonna be privately funded by citizens. Right? We're gonna provide the space, but we've gotta make sure that people get to come and tell their story. So I hope it's the start of conversations that expands and continues to grow around the world.
And then I hope we learn from it. We do a better job compensating our individuals, and we can speak to the government and say, hey. The money you've got on the table is not enough, and you've gotta start listening to what their concerns are. And then we we can do better in the future either through additional discussions, through parliamentary, committees, through whatever the case may be. But we we continue this conversation to to make sure this never happens again.
Speaker 0: Absolutely agree. I have to want to say, really, I commend you both for the incredible work that you're both doing. And it's deeply encouraging to see, in particular, you know, qualified and and professional lawyers from the legal side meeting up and dealing with people who have been elected into parliament itself. That that's a powerful mix, and I absolutely wish you every success with it. You know, we're gonna put the this out to the the general viewing very, very soon.
We're gonna make sure the links go in, especially to the the donate page and and to the funding page. But can I just say, gentlemen, it's been an absolute pleasure to have you on with me? It's gone past all too quickly. I would definitely love to have you back on again. So please keep in contact, and I can assure you the next time I'm in Canada, I'll let you know.
And likewise, Dean, if you're in The UK, I'm up and down to London a lot. If you're if you come to London, let me know. We'll meet up for a a cup of tea or a coffee, whatever you want to do. But let's keep in contact and please continue the great work that you're both doing. Thank you, gentlemen, indeed for being here with us today.
Speaker 1: Thank you for having us.
Speaker 2: Thanks for having us, Jim.
Speaker 0: You're absolutely my pleasure. And to all the people who are watching this right now, here we have a real powerful combination of of truth seeking that's going on. Having that conversation is incredibly important. So please do share, do do like, do follow the work, go to the go to the Alison Inquiry, go in and have a look and and see for yourselves the great work that's being done. But to each and every one of you, thank you for sharing, thank you for liking this, and also I want you to know, you guys that watch this, you're the real stars of this show and I appreciate each and every one of you.
So until next time, this is Jim Ferguson and we'll speak soon. Bye bye for now. Hello, everyone. Jim Ferguson here from Freedom Train International. I want to speak to you from my heart because what we do here only exists through your support.
Freedom Train International isn't backed by corporations. We are entirely powered by you, ordinary people who care about truth, transparency and freedom. Every interview, every report, every investigation takes time, travel, and a dedicated global team working behind the scenes. They do it because they believe in what we stand for, and your support keeps them going. You can give as little as $3.77, either as a one time gift or a monthly donation.
Every contribution helps support our international operations from production and research to outreach and reporting, including the ambassadors working around the world to expose truth in their own nations. Your donation doesn't just fund journalism, it fuels independence. It helps us stay free from censorship, free from control, and free to keep shining the light on what others hide. So if you believe truth still matters, please consider donating today. Together, we're not just reporting the story, we're defending freedom one voice at a time.
I am Jim Ferguson of Freedom Train International. Thank you for standing with me and with our global Freedom Train International team, working every day to keep truth alive.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
https://t.co/oifvdSNS6y 🚨 IF THESE ALLEGATIONS ARE TRUE, THEY WOULD SHAKE THE U.S. INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY TO ITS CORE. A CIA whistleblower has made explosive allegations involving the CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Among the claims: ▪️ The CIA allegedly monitored the computers and phones of personnel working under DNI Tulsi Gabbard. ▪️ A contractor assisting the investigation was allegedly fired one day after meeting with investigators. ▪️ The CIA allegedly reclaimed 40 boxes of JFK and MK-Ultra files that were being processed for declassification. The whistleblower stated: "These were Americans being spied upon illegally while executing duties directed by the President and under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence." These are extraordinary allegations. If substantiated, they would demand a full investigation and accountability at the highest levels. The American people deserve to know the truth.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The CIA refused to provide information necessary to understand why analytical standards at the CIA were violated. The CIA illegally monitored the computer and phone usage of DIG personnel, including their investigations and contact with whistleblowers. The monitoring involved Americans being spied upon illegally while executing duties directed by the President and under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence.
One CIA contractor assisting with the DIG’s investigation into events that transpired between 2022 and 2023 was fired by the CIA one day after meeting with the DIG. When the DIG ceased operations, the CIA also took back 40 boxes of JFK files and MKUltra files that were being processed for declassification by DNI Gabbard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The CIA refused to provide information necessary to understand why analytical standards at the CIA were violated. The CIA illegally monitored the computer and phone usage of DIG personnel, their investigations, and contact with whistleblowers. These were Americans being spied upon illegally while executing duties directed by the President and under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence. One CIA contractor assisting with the DIG's investigation into the events that transpired between 2022 and 2023 was fired by the CIA one day after meeting with the DIG. When the DIG ceased operations, the CIA also took back 40 boxes of JFK files and MKUltra files being processed for declassification by DNI Gabbard.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I recount Dr My-Le Trinh, a GP in Australia for nearly 30 years, who questioned the COVID narrative, treated patients, and refused to comply with policies she believed harmed people. The system suspended her licence and kept her in court for years. I explore why she believes early treatments were suppressed, why doctors were silenced, and how her fight touches medical autonomy and freedom of speech—about who controls medicine and information.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 SUSPENDED FOR TELLING THE TRUTH For nearly 30 years, Dr My-Le Trinh served as a GP in Australia. Then COVID happened. She questioned the narrative. She treated patients. She refused to comply with policies she believed were harming people. And the system moved against her. Licence suspended. Career threatened. Years in court. In my interview, she explains why she believes early treatments were suppressed, why doctors were silenced through fear, and why her legal fight now goes far beyond her own profession — to the core issue of medical autonomy and freedom of speech. Whether you agree with her conclusions or not, her story raises serious questions about power, authority, and what happened during those years the world was told there was only “one acceptable view.” This is not just about one doctor. It’s about who controls medicine. Who controls information. And what happens to those who dissent. Watch the full interview. @myletrinh123
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Miley Trinh, a GP based in Sydney, Australia, joins Jim Ferguson for her first appearance on the show. She explains she has practiced as a GP for nearly thirty years and has been suspended since late 2021 amid a dispute with the health regulator over her license. She describes her suspension as part of a broader fight with regulators and regulators’ attempts to cancel her medical license.
Trinh recounts how her concerns about the COVID-19 situation began in 2019, while following global events and studying debt-based economic systems. She states she became alarmed by reports of Wuhan’s lockdown timing, noting that authorities announced a lockdown five days earlier and allowed travel before it commenced, which she found alarming. She observed what she called unusual global coordination in reporting and policy responses to the pandemic, with early treatment being suppressed and a tightly controlled narrative across countries.
Regarding ivermectin, she says she concluded after months of research that it was a key medication for treating COVID-19, particularly when given early. She describes participating in doctor groups and Zoom meetings to discuss how to treat patients and notes she treated a patient by telephone during lockdown who was deteriorating. She reports that the patient improved after her treatment but later faced complications requiring hospital care. She says two complaints were filed against her in September 2021—the first from a patient she had helped, and the second from an individual named John Smith who obtained a prescription that belonged to a family member for ivermectin. She asserts John Smith did not belong to her practice, and that the prescription was allegedly handed to an APRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) agent, a fact she says regulators overlooked when investigating her practice.
Trinh emphasizes that she had never before faced a complaint in nearly thirty years of practice and that the suspension hearing concluded with her being deemed a danger to public health, despite her insistence that she saved a life. She has remained suspended for over four years. She describes the regulatory process as involving claims of prescribing ivermectin “below standard” and accusations of professional misconduct for not handing over 20 to 30 patient medical files, which she says she refused to provide because she did not know the patients’ names and because none of the patients had filed complaints against her. She notes that hearings occurred in December, March, and August, with subsequent issues over transcript integrity and requests for recusal of the presiding judge. She says a decision on the main case is imminent, but a cancellation of her license could entail a three to five-year suspension and substantial costs, complicating the possibility of reinstatement.
Beyond her case, she argues the fight is about medical autonomy and the right for physicians to tailor treatments to individual patients, not be dictated by politicians or rigid guidelines. She criticizes what she views as a heavily censored environment for doctors who questioned the pandemic narrative or advocated for therapeutics like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and zinc. She asserts that the COVID-19 Task Force guidelines opposed ivermectin and other therapeutics, and she contends such guidelines restrict doctors’ ability to provide individualized care.
Trinh links the censorship and regulatory pressure to broader concerns about global governance, citing media suppression, removal of dissent on platforms like Facebook and YouTube, and increased control over platforms such as X (formerly Twitter). She mentions public support, including her presence on X and Facebook, as important to her ongoing legal battle and the broader struggle over medical autonomy and truth during the pandemic.
She concludes by inviting people to follow her on X and Facebook to learn more and to show support as she pursues potential appeals if the judgment does not go in her favor. She frames her case as about more than COVID-19 alone: it is about challenging what she views as a long-standing, disproportionate control of doctors and a fight for fundamental rights, including the right to a hearing before the tribunal and the right to medical decision-making free from political interference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, thanks very much indeed. Welcome to the show. I am Jim Ferguson, and I'm joined with a great guest. Her name is Doctor. Miley Trinh, all the way from Australia.
It's her first time on the show. A big welcome to you, Doctor. Trinh.
Speaker 1: Hi, Jim. Thank you for having me on the show.
Speaker 0: You're very welcome. As a first time guest, maybe you would just, for the sake of our audience, tell us a little bit about briefly a little bit about who you are, what you do, where you're located, please.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. I'm a GP in Australia. I'm locating located in Sydney. I've been practicing as GP for almost thirty years before, being suspended, in late two thousand twenty one, and I've been fighting in the court, regarding my suspension and attempt by the health regulator to cancel my license.
Speaker 0: No. I mean, this is obviously to do with the whole COVID pandemic. It's to do with your principled stand that you took. Let me ask you to go back to when you first thought and realized there was something not right about the whole thing. When was what the what was the earliest point you you you just sort of, in your own mind, discovered there's something not right about this?
Speaker 1: So it started fairly early. In 2019, I was following the story of, I was following Donald Trump, campaign for his reelection in 2020. And, but the background of that, I have, interest in, about the financial situation, about the the the fact that we're in a debt a system of a debt based system, and it's about to implode. And I was just watching for any world event that could sort of, change or or indicate there's an indication that that that that there's some serious issues that's gonna come up. So when there was suspicion of, you know, anovirus or or a coronavirus being very serious and deadly, it it's I started to become very concerned, and I acutely aware of the the situation.
So I started to do a lot of research into it. And when the when Wuhan lockdown took place, when they closed Wuhan, but they announced, that they were gonna close it down and but for, they announced that they're close it down five days beforehand and allow the people to travel all over the world to spread the virus. That to me was, quite alarming and quite concerning because it it didn't make any sense whatsoever.
Speaker 0: Yes. I must admit, it was in, December. I think it was early December. I was actually in the Brexit party as a parliamentary candidate fighting the general election at the time, but I remember seeing those reports come out, those things coming out from China as well, and it started to raise red flags for me, and I think a lot of people that I know who have appeared on the show were were in the same position. And and I think also, the way it happened, the sort of coordinated lockstep that the the the the the world's governments were in also raised red flags because it seemed that there was a coordinated, plan unfolding.
Did you feel that as well?
Speaker 1: Definitely. So it was really unusual that every country have the same narrative. And, so I was watching what was happening in Italy and then what what was happening in The US because we were late to have our sort of cases arising. So, I was, seeing how unusual was the way the pandemic was dealt with, how every country responded in the same way, and how early treatment was, being suppressed and controlled. The narrative seems very controlled.
Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean the mainstream media were were almost giving identical reports all at the same time delivering exactly the same message. That, and a lot of people have said it since, has all the hallmarks of a psychological operation that was rolling out, and they were using fear to bully, coerce, intimidate people. And of course, when people are afraid, they look to leadership, and often that's the government. But the government's played a very, very big role, our respective government certainly, that I know Australia did, know The United Kingdom did in particular as well, in pushing that narrative that everybody had to get the mRNA shots, this experimental gene editing therapy, which which I I don't even like calling it a vaccine.
They sort of called it a vaccine, but it wasn't really a vaccine, was it?
Speaker 1: Well, no. It's, it's an experimental product that should not have been pushed upon the world, and certainly not especially people who who or well, especially young people who could deal with the infection quite easily without having to to take an experimental product. And the fact that they were coerced, and it was mandated, in order to for for these people to, take the procedure before they could continue to work. There's so much pressure and so much coercion in Australia. It's it's frightening.
It's it's it's like it's just surreal. I I just couldn't believe that we come to a point in so called free country where we were so controlled and so we were pushed a narrative that was completely false and, pushed by health regulators, pushed pushed by health, so called experts and our own government. And there was no, discussion of the effects of this new experimental vaccine. No discussion on early treatment, management of the, of the pandemic. So it's it's it's bizarre.
It's very disturbing. And, I mean, as a health regulate as as a health practitioner, my I see my role as being the primary care giver that I have to educate myself and to prepare myself if I have a patient that that's got COVID nineteen infection that I I need to be able to equip myself to know how to treat such patients, and that's what I I I did. So it's it was an unusual way of dealing with a disease that they said that it's new, and it's it's deadly, and they have to lock down the whole country. And yet the the response was completely illogical and irrational.
Speaker 0: It certainly was. I know that Australia got hit very, very hard in terms of lockdowns. In the state of Victoria, remember seeing it under Dan Andrews, the the, I don't know how you would describe him, but I mean, he he seemed to be quite gleeful about the newfound power that he had, and he was he wasn't slow in threatening people, and he seemed to be enjoying himself. I mean, Dan Andrews is one of the worst. I know Canada got hit, of course, very, very hard, which led to the rise of the Canadian, Truckers Convoy, that freedom movement, many of whom I've met, all of the leadership I've met in my travels to North America.
What was your reaction after doing the research? Because I think ivermectin played a big part in what you were trying to do to help your patients.
Speaker 1: Yes. So in, after many months of research, I came to a conclusion that ivermectin was a key medication that could, very effectively, treating COVID nineteen, especially if if it's given early. So I I was in a group. I attended Zoom meeting with various groups and, in particular, a group with lots of other doctors discussing how we could handle or treat patients that that were sick. So I educated myself and equipped myself with that knowledge and understanding, and, that's how it all began.
So in so in July, I, well, I took a bit of time off work during the pandemic, because I wanted to understand a bit more about the situation and also about the available treatment, because that wasn't forthcoming from, the health, our health departments. So and also the GP college, etcetera. So I, once I was able to once I I knew that I was convinced that there was treatment available, I felt the need to be back at work so that I could provide treatments for people who who were sick. So it started when I had a referral from a from, a colleague who, was aware of a patient, in my area, that was sick and needing some help, for treating COVID nineteen. And so I, accepted that responsibility and and took on to treat her.
So she was in a lockdown area, and I wasn't able to go to visit her in her home. So the treatment was conducted over the phone. So that patient, got better after my treatment. She was very, very unwell, and I had to use various I mean, I was using medication in a way that I normally wouldn't use in general practice, but it was an emergency. So I used high dosage of steroid to treat her psycho her cytokine storm.
So so she was she got better, but then she had some complication from the treatment and ended up in hospital. And I got reported by the intern of that particular patient. So I received two complaints in in September 2021. So two complaints came, on the same day, And that was a shock to me because I couldn't understand why I had a complaint made against me when I did everything possible and I saved her life. And and the second complaint was from someone by the name of John Smith, and the circumstances around that complaint was quite bizarre because John Smith happened to obtain a prescription that belonged to a family member that I prescribed ivermectin for, and that prescription was taken by me to the chemist to the local chemist.
And so it was with a chemist. And, somehow, John Smith was able to obtain that prescription. And and I I didn't have a a patient by the name of John Smith, so he he wasn't a patient of mine. So that prescription was used as as a way of claiming that I promote there was a claim that I was promoting a treatment of ivermectin as the treatment of COVID nineteen and that I was promoting this measure this treatment online and that, I am an anti vaxxer, etcetera. So that was all false.
I I didn't do any of that. And the issue the real issue was how did John Smith obtain that prescription. So when I found out that that prescription was it belongs to who whoever it was, and I knew the whereabout of that prescription. I went back to the chemist, and asked where the prescription had gone to. And I was told that the that the chemist had told me that the prescription was handed over to an APRA agent.
So APRA being the Australian health regulator in Australia. So the so so the basis of that complaint was really completely fraudulent, and they the health regulator, instead of looking at the, fraudulent nature of that complaint, Instead of looking into that, it investigated me, and my practice. And for almost thirty years being a GP, I've never had a complaint made against me. But all of a sudden, one day, I had two came on one day, and and one from by someone who I about a patient whom I saved, and the other one was completely fraudulent and baseless. So I was taken to this meeting, this suspension hearing.
And at the end of the hearing, I was suspended because I was considered a danger to public health. And I've done nothing wrong. What what I did was treating patients that were sick, and I did everything possible to save that patient's life. I went beyond my core to to to make sure that she's gonna survive. And so
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: I've been suspended since so it's been suspended for four years and three months.
Speaker 0: We're gonna we're gonna come on to ivermectin in a moment. We're gonna go for a very, very short break. Don't go away. We're gonna be right back, and, then we're gonna talk a little bit more about ivermectin itself as one of the safest drugs. We'll be right back.
Are you still feeling off after the COVID vaccine? You're not alone and new research backs it up. In a groundbreaking study, Risk Stratification for Future Cardiac Arrest After the Jab, Doctor Peter McCullough highlights an alarming rise in sudden cardiac events among young and previously healthy individuals. His study found that tiny hidden patches of heart inflammation often missed by doctors could silently be building up leading to sudden heart attacks during exercise or sleep. That's why the wellness company created the three in one ultimate spike detox, crafted with 100% natural ingredients specifically designed to help your body clear harmful spike proteins, reduce inflammation and support heart health.
Don't wait until symptoms strike, experience the only formula approved and used by Doctor. McCullough, a top freedom fighting doctor who risked it all. Head to twc.healthgym10 and use code gym 10 to get 10% off. And we're back. I I want to clarify a couple of things that you mentioned.
First of all, you talked about a cytokine storm. People might not know what that is. A cytokine storm, if I'm right, is where the body produces an overreaction to something that is going on. Am I right in saying that?
Speaker 1: Yes, that's correct. So when the patient is, has been treated early enough and they have a significant vital viral load and the coronavirus being very immunogenic in in terms of the in terms of the reaction that the body's reacting to the virus, it induce a severe immunological response and it attacks the tissue in the lungs. So the lung tissue, I mean. So when your lungs becomes inflamed, then there's no oxygen exchange. So so the the blood cannot obtain oxygen and and and doesn't get oxygenated.
Basically So you're in respiratory failure. So in order to reduce the inflammation in your lungs, you've got to take a huge dose of steroid in order to dampen down the inflammation. That doesn't happen until you're in the second phase of the COVID infection. So if get treated early, you get over it quite easily. But if you get it quite late and you get it quite severe, then you go to the second phase of the lung inflammation and that's a very serious illness and it could result in death.
So technically, these patients should be really be in hospital and be treated in ICU. A lot of them were being treated in ICU. But in particular, the patient that I was treated, she had been to hospital before. She wasn't given any medication and she discharged against medical advice. She continued to deteriorate over a number of days when she contacted me.
By then, she was sort of going to the second phase of the disease and it was a lot harder to treat and she didn't want to be she didn't want to go back to the hospital. So I had no choice, but well, I felt that I needed to treat her or else she would die. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Well, thank you for clarifying that and for explaining it. The other thing I want to touch on is ivermectin itself. Ivermectin, I remember it was absolutely trashed by the mainstream media yet this is a drug that's been on the on the market, I think thirty, forty years. It's won prizes for being incredibly safe. It's very cheap to produce.
Ivermectin is not a dangerous drug, is it?
Speaker 1: No, not at all. In fact, it's one of the safest drug that we've had. So it's been around for, I think, almost forty years and it's won a Nobel Prize for the discoverers two two discoverers won the Nobel Prize for that. And it's been used successfully in treatment of parasitic infection and disease like river blindness. And because of my background, I was born in Cambodia, and I was a refugee from from Cambodia to Vietnam and then to Australia as a boat refugee.
So I after I became a doctor, I provided I went back to Cambodia to provide medical mission work in Cambodia, in a rural area of Cambodia. So there's a condition, a parasitic infection of the intestine called strongyloides, which respond very well to ivermectin. So I had experience using ivermectin for such condition. Ivermectin was available over the counter in Cambodia. So it was not a drug that unfamiliar to me, and it was not a drug that I have any concern in using, and I have experience using it.
So yeah.
Speaker 0: There there was a a clear attempt by the mainstream media to completely denigrate ivermectin, to completely rubbish the whole name of ivermectin. They referred to it as horse paste. They made fun of it. You wonder why they would do that to a Nobel winning a Nobel winning prize medication that that is has been around for decades. Sometimes people say follow the money and and there were other people who were sitting very much involved with the whole mRNA scam, because I because I that's how I see it.
Bill Gates was one of them. He was making considerable sums of money. There were indeed others that appear to have made a lot of money. Even the former prime Minister in The United Kingdom, Ritchie Sunek, who it turns out made an investment back in 2017 of $500,000,000 of his own personal wealth, he's a very wealthy individual, into Moderna through a shell company that he helped create in the Cayman Islands known as Thelim Partners. And I'm not sure if you're aware of that, but he was challenged because he was standing up in the Houses of Parliament here in London saying how safe and effective the mRNA shots were, all the while, making a huge amount of profit, it would seem.
And when you I don't know if you're aware of that, but what what what's your reaction to that?
Speaker 1: Well, ivermectin is a huge threat. Ivermectin and hydrochloroquine is a huge threat to the the provision provisional approval for the vaccine. So the the law concerning the approval of an experimental drug for a new disease is that if there isn't any therapeutics available for that disease, then you can resort, you have to resort to experimental drugs. So any therapeutics like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin d, vitamin c, zinc, and anything at all that is that is that's gonna help COVID, that's gonna alleviate COVID is a threat to the emergency use authorization. So you have there has to be there has to not be a therapeutic before the vaccine could be approved.
So so ivermectin is a huge threat because it's it's the safest drug. It is much safer than hydroxychloroquine. And we didn't need the vaccine. In fact, can I can I can say with all of my heart with what I know that we didn't need the vaccine, that COVID could be treated very easily and very like, it's really easy to treat if we advocate early treatment, if we encourage people to take vitamin D and take measures to boost the immune system, go out in the sun, just measures like that? And that's been shown in India, in a province called Uttar Pradesh where they gave ivermectin and a combination of other things.
I'm not sure exactly what they gave, but it's ivermectin combination of other medication for treatment of COVID-nineteen. And people just self medicate and within a few weeks, literally within a few weeks, COVID infection subsided to nothing. And they didn't need to resort to they didn't need to push, the vaccination so much, and they didn't need to lock down the country as long as we had had that to do.
Speaker 0: Yes. So I remember I I remember the the news coming out of Uttar Pradesh in India where that actually happened, and, they had huge, huge success with it.
Speaker 1: That's right. And that story was completely suppressed by the mainstream media.
Speaker 0: Yes. I mean, it seems that there were there there was other reasons why this pandemic came along. I'm not sure just how involved some of these billionaires were, but there was a lot of people made a lot of money. Of course, big pharma were really pushing it out as well. They were paying fortunes for media coverage.
There was a lot of people in the media that just went along with it simply because they were making a lot of money. This happened in Australia extensively as well, didn't it?
Speaker 1: Yes. It is. I I think it's it's the same that what you have in The UK. It's a very coordinated effort, you know. This is it's it's I I just think it's been planned for a long time.
So it's all the right people and in the right places to do what they needed to do. And and people were so I mean, it's so controlled that we just got nowhere to move, nowhere to to you know, if you say something, if your voice up, you you get suppressed, the the media will the social media or like Facebook will suppress, you know, will cancel your your account and things like that and you you get censored, you get cancelled, that kind of thing. It's such high level of censorship and in particular, those people who spoke out against the pandemic and those people who speaks who spoke about therapeutics and things like that. So so we're dealing with a a a situation where the the authorities were in complete control of the narrative and there wasn't any truth coming out. It's just all lies.
Speaker 0: I remember joining a group on Facebook where there were people who had taken the vaccine. I'm not vaccinated. I refused to do it, but I remember joining this Facebook group. There, there must have been about 20, maybe 30,000 people in at that point and a lot of the people were sort of posting images of their skin and, and, and things that were going wrong after they had taken the vaccine. Well, that group got shut down and censored very, very quickly.
Facebook were one of the worst. Mark Zuckerberg was very much involved with the censoring of it all. YouTube didn't feel much better and they still don't like people talking about this. X actually is the only real free platform for social media, that's why X is the only platform that I really bother with. And I do a lot of interviews with professors and scientists and doctors of course like yourself And because Elon Musk does believe in freedom of speech and of course, the Albanese government in Australia is attacking X vigorously as is Starmer in The UK, as is Mark Carney in Canada.
The three of them seem to be coordinating together to try to actually bar X. When you hear of that sort of level of censorship kicking in again, what what do you think of that?
Speaker 1: It's a different world we're living in. It's not what like what it used to be. It's something that we I find it really hard to to come to terms with. But it's changed, like our world's changed since COVID and it's it's not going back. It it's it's moving on the same as it is.
And I mean, as a GP for like, I I'm a very private person. I I never post anything on social media, and I never spoke out about anything, in you know, in particular. But when COVID came along, the the I just the the the wrong that's been done to the people is to a level where I just can't, not speak out and I can't, especially because I've been I was suspended. Especially I've been suspended, I I have no choice. But I felt a need.
I feel a need to speak out and to to voice, the truth because without voices of reason and truth, you're just gonna be overwhelmed with the lies. And and it's it's hard to have the courage to do that, but but I have to for the future of my children and and future generation because if we don't do anything, we're just gonna be completely completely controlled.
Speaker 0: Well, I absolutely commend you for the courageous stand that you took for your patience, for the truth, to get that word out there and and you're still fighting hard. We're gonna come on to parts of the court case in a moment, but first of all, before we do that, I want to, I want to go back to, you know, you're obviously a deep thinker, you mean you're a professional healthcare practitioner, you're a doctor, you're a GP. You, you think deeply. Why do you think, I mean, you might not know the answer to this, but I always like to ask people when they come on the show, what do you think was actually behind all of this? Because the data is showing how harmful the mRNA shots were.
I mean, we could spend the next three hours talking about just on the data itself and all of it is government data. But what do you think was really motivating these elites, these globalists to do what they did?
Speaker 1: I can't help but to say that it is it is about control and it is about depopulation. You wouldn't want why would you give an experimental injection to the mass population? You you not only are you giving to them, you you've almost forced them to. You it the the level of coercion was so unbelievable that it was really hard for people to say no to. And there has to be a motive and the motive is to vaccinate all the population, as as as many as possible on a product that that in the in fact, we know it's harmful before it even it even created.
I mean, mRNA the mRNA therapy has been available for years before the COVID before COVID and a few of the experiments that's been done on people have had really bad effect. In fact, many of those patients died and experimental on ferret and animals, they all died. So initially when it was first introduced, it was designed for use in genetic disorder where there's no available therapeutics. And that's only what it's reserved for a situation where there's no hope. And so there's a need for, research into therapeutics for that kind of diseases.
But for the mass population to be injected with that kind of medication, that kind of therapeutics, that kind of treatment was actually not a treatment to be given an experimental product that we knew that it's gonna cause harm. Unjust it it cannot be justified. So why would why would people wanna do that unless they want to depublic the world? So there's very dark, nefarious agendas behind and and also control. I mean, all of a sudden in, you know, Western nations, those nations that were considered are free are the least free of all.
We were if if you don't take the job, you can't work, you can't travel, you can't visit your loved ones, you can't live visit your dying loved one, you can't visit them in the nursing home. They just it's just unbelievable. It's just unbelievable. It's I mean, I was born in Cambodia, and my I lost my mom from the during the Khmer Rouge. And and I know that level of threat and and and fear that's from from government, but this is another level altogether.
And and the worst of all is that they're doing all this under this facade that they're doing to protect the public. They they doing it for your for your safety and for your benefit, and none of that was true.
Speaker 0: I think I think as somebody that's that that that that that that knows what communism really is under Paul Pott, the Khmer Rouge, huge numbers of people, I think millions were were were were slaughtered under his tenure. But going back to the earlier parts of the pandemic, I remember speaking with people, and many of them were doctors, some were scientists, some were professors who were looking into this and I remember thinking, look, is, is there has to be something more going on here and then I started to hear about the depopulation agenda where people like Professor Dennis Meadows has quite openly said on YouTube, you know, there's too many people in the world, billions have to go, that the planet can't sustain that population. But they're never the first ones to volunteer to off themselves, say doctor R, they, it's always everybody else that has to to do that, but it looks like, unbelievable as it seems, it looks like men and women, men and women, very powerful, very wealthy people, elites as they like to call themselves. I I tend to call them parasites, to be honest, because they are the parasite class. They have taken the decision, it would appear, to thin the hair, to get rid of many, many people.
We saw our elderly communities here in The United Kingdom being treated with drugs that were extremely harmful in care homes. You vitamin D. Vitamin D is another very safe thing for people to take, very cheap to produce, but they didn't wanna know. And of course that, a lot of elderly in The UK in particular, don't get a lot of sunshine. That would have boosted their immune systems tremendously as well.
Vitamin vitamin d along with zinc, and these types of things that ivermectin could have saved many, many millions of lives around the world, but actually many millions of lives were lost. What is the mentality of people that would that would decide that they were going to perpetuate, you know, perpetrate a global pandemic with the sole aim of of depopulation and control of the remaining population? It seems I think evil is the only way I can describe it.
Speaker 1: Yes. I agree. Because really, they have no rights to decide for all of us. Who are they to say that the world is overpopulated? We only occupy a small part of the world.
I mean, Australia is so vast and we only most of us only live in the in in the East Coast. There's many areas of many open land that that hasn't been occupied. Who is who is it to say that those areas can't we can't live in those areas? So but who who it is to say that for them to take away lives? They it's not for them to take it away.
It's not they did not create a life. We are all created by God and they they have no right to make a decision to to to take away someone's life. And that's actually what happened. They pushed the jab, they locked down they locked down the country, they forced people to take an experimental product. They provide treatment that's not effective in hospital.
They And they have no rights to do any of this. And I think in a way that I felt responsible in a sense that I felt that these people have such power to do what they they've been doing. And it's because the civilian, the average people, refuse to stand up and refuse to say no and refuse to to to to comply. Well, that they we always comply is the problem. And we we we're not we we refuse to stand up and to we refuse to stand up for what is right.
A lot of the time, we'll hope we're hoping that someone would do it. Someone better will come along and would stand up and speak for us or or do something great. But I think that the world is the way it is because we allow just a few people to make decision for for everyone else. And it's about time for the rest of us to actually, say, speak out and and stand up for what is right and don't tolerate what is wrong. And I think that COVID is one of those thing where we cannot tolerate that kind that level of evil, that level of deception wrong to be perpetrated for the whole population.
And for some of especially for some of us who are in the know, I mean, you don't know what goes on, then you can't really do anything. But for for for some of us that are in the know, we need to be able to we need to speak out, we need to stand up. It's really hard for me for what I'm for what I do, but, you know, I I believe in that. I want to do that because I can only do what I do. I can't tell what you know, I can't tell people what to do.
So I need to do what is right and to hopefully encourage others to do the same.
Speaker 0: You know, Freedom Tour International was inspired by the Canadian Trucker Convoy movement. I went there. I met all the leadership, decided to set up an international freedom movement, which is the largest and and fast still fastest growing in the world. We have a motto, don't be scared, be prepared. And I think that that that's very true in a lot of this.
We've got to stand up, we've got to fight for the truth, we've got to fight for our rights and stand firm and hold firm together. And of course, that was one of the things they tried to do is to try to suggest that everybody that was asking questions was somehow, some kind of conspiracy theorist or anti vaxxer. You were labeled that as well. So I think, I think that, that it is all coming out. Now we're seeing an explosion in cancers, sometimes referred to as turbo cancers or early onset cancers where people go from not stage one, stage two, but they're straight to stage three or stage four cancer.
Are you seeing that in Australia as well?
Speaker 1: Yes. So I I have got friends that and and close I have friends that I know that I have have had stage four cancer, and I believe that it came from the vaccine.
Speaker 0: A lot of people. Now they're trying to take your license. Tell us a little bit more about what's the next steps with the court case that's coming up.
Speaker 1: So I've been fighting this for four years, nonstop. I initially took the medical counsel, the body that suspended me in 2021. I took them to the tribunal and then to the supreme court court of appeal. They dismissed my case, but, I I actually disagreed with the decision of the supreme court. But in the process of while I was doing that, they initiated a prosecution proceeding against me.
So that was in late two thousand and twenty three, and that's the proceeding that I'm in at the moment, the proceeding that's before the tribunal. So they're seeking to cancel my license. They deemed that I have practiced significantly below standard for prescribing ivermectin, and they also alleged that I have committed professional misconduct for not handing over 20 to 30 patients medical files that they were seeking. But the the thing is that they didn't know the name of those patients, and none of those patients made a complaint against me. And I've been advised by two lawyers not to hand over those medical files.
So so that's those are, the allegations that I have had to, face, before the tribunal. So that was, the hearing started in December. Sorry, December the before And it went to I had a second lot of hearing in March, and then we had a closing hearing in August. But then after August, I have initiated two two more proceedings because I discovered that the transcript was not how it's meant to be and that bits of the audio was missing, etcetera. So I had to challenge that issue.
And, also, I applied for a recusal of the judge. So that hearing took place last week. So I think it won't be long before the decision of my main case would be would be released. So after that, I don't know what's gonna happen depending on what the decision, would be, will be. So if they're successful in cancelling my license, say they want to cancel it for further three to five years and they want me to pay for the costs of the prosecution proceeding, which been going on since 2023.
And they also wanna fine me thousands of dollars for committing professional misconduct and unprofessional conduct, and and that could be up to $50,000. And it's really hard if you get suspended for that long and and have your license canceled for that long. It's hard for you to get reinstated. And it will be the same body who's gonna approve if I want to if I if I were to be cancelled and I I wanted to reapply. It's the same body's gonna approve my my application for, you know, if I wanna get back.
So but my fight since, you know, since beginning till now, it's it's really more than just my license. It's about truth of what happened during the COVID pandemic. I refuse to call it a pandemic. It's a pandemic. And the truth about ivermectin because the fact that many people because in Australia, they banned ivermectin.
I don't know what happened in Canada, but they banned ivermectin in Australia for for, I think, about two years, more than two years. And there was no reason for them to ban ivermectin. And ivermectin would have saved many lives and those the lives that have lost as a result of being denied of these people being denied of cure. It's criminal and they only would know if I continue to speak out and I continue to fight my fight. So my fight is more than just my license.
It's about that. But it's also about medical autonomy. As physician, we are not we're not we should not be dictated by politicians or health regulators as to how we should treat our patient. We should treat our patient individually. Should be catered for individual patient depending on their health circumstance And we should apply what is best for that particular patient.
We should not be dictated by guidelines how to treat, what should we use, what should be for particular disease, what specific medication had to be used. It should not be like that. And a guideline is a guideline. It's not one where you strictly have to abide by. So I've been judged by this particular guideline that the COVID nineteen task force had had, you know, put together.
And that that guideline was against the use of ivermectin and against the use of anything that works. So I can't do that. I can't morally do that as a doctor to deny a patient, a dying patient, of an effective treatment. And so my fight is about medical autonomy and politicians shouldn't be involved in how doctors care for their patient.
Speaker 0: Especially politicians who are globalists and following a global agenda that is not in the interests of humanity itself. Where can people find more about you? How how can people support you?
Speaker 1: I I like them to they can they can follow me on X. So my Twitter handle is maileitwin one two three and on Facebook. I'm very active on Facebook as well as SX. I I just want people to share my story because I'm going through the court process and and having public support is very significant. I'm also seeking to it's there's a likelihood that I might have to appeal my case if the judgment is not going my way.
So in a few months, I'm I the judgment will probably be released, and I would have to continue to fight on. And there'll be another eighteen months or so of fighting in the Supreme Court. So I just want the public support to continue. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Well, you you know, as we always do with our great guests, I always give them the last and final word, bearing in mind that we have a very large following all across North America, including Canada, and actually all around the world. We have a lot of Aussies that follow us here on the show as well. So what would you like to say to them? Floor is yours. I
Speaker 1: wanna say that my fight against the medical council, against the health care complaints commission is highly significant in Australia. And this is what I'm fighting for is more than more than COVID. It's about because because the health regulator's been able to control doctors for fifteen years since the introduction of a new law that we are regulated under. And I have in in my case to the Court of Appeal, I challenge a particular legislation that's really significant because it allows doctors when they suspend it, they we we we supposed to have we're supposed to be referred to the tribunal before we get prosecuted. So so the injustice is that doctors are so how how can I they the the the way the the way the health regulators been running, the proceedings like like myself and and cases where they want the the when they want to suppress a particular treatment and a particular doctor is being persecuted, they go through this process where the doctors do not have the right to have a hearing and that right, that legislation I challenge in the in the Supreme Court, which I failed?
However, I am planning to rechallenge that second time in the Supreme Court. And if I'm successful, it means that the the control that the health regulators have on on on doctors and on on health, professional in general, will not be able to continue because that right the right to have a hearing before the tribunal, before the prosecution is highly significant, and that's been denied that's been denied for for more than a decade. So so so like an example in my case, the substantive matter of my case has never been hurt. And yet, I'm facing prosecution. Look at the level of injustice that is for for for someone.
I mean, not you don't need to be a doctor. Just in general, if if you've been accused of something, you need to you need to be able to have a hearing to have a say. And that is the fundamental legal rights of of any individual. That's a human right. And that's been denied to all by all doctors to all doctors.
That's been denied for a long time. So that's why, the level control of doctors in Australia is is is so severe that, doctors in Australia are so afraid to speak out, and they they all do what they are told to do. And so I want to be able to change that. And and my case, if if I need to appeal to the supreme court this time, I will be challenging that legislation again.
Speaker 0: Well Doctor. Maile Trinh, want to say I commend you for the great courageous stance that you're taking and I want to really thank you for being on the show with us today telling us about your experience and what's happening.
Speaker 1: Thank you Jim for having me on the show. Thank you so much for the opportunity.
Speaker 0: My absolute pleasure to all of you out there watching. This is a very principled lady. She's tough, she's sincere and you can really help her by sharing this content. Let's get this out far and wide all around the world because people need to know that there are good doctors who fight for them and the whole medical practice itself. So thank you Doctor.
Maile Chren and thank you to each and every one of you for watching. Until next time, this is Jim Ferguson and we'll speak soon. Bye bye for now.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I heard Ben Habib warn that the richest and most powerful meet behind closed doors with no agenda, minutes, or public scrutiny—the World Economic Forum. A man resurfaced, shielded, installed—not to serve the people, but to keep a rotten establishment going as it collapses. Britain won’t be saved by closed rooms or unelected elites; it will be saved when the public finally says enough.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
BREAKING: THIS WAS THE MOMENT THE MASK CAME OFF. Ben Habib closed with a warning that cut straight to the core: There can be no good in the richest people on earth meeting the most powerful people on earth — behind closed doors, with no agenda, no minutes, and no public scrutiny. That is the World Economic Forum. What we’re seeing with Mandelson, Habib said, is only the tip of the iceberg. A man repeatedly resurrected by the system. Shielded. Ennobled. Installed. Not because he serves the people — but because the establishment is rotten to its core. A political class that takes money from foreign billionaires to speak at elite global forums is not governing a nation. It is managing its collapse. This was not rhetoric. It was an accusation. And a final reminder: Britain will not be saved by closed rooms, global elites, or unelected power. It will only be saved when the public finally says: enough. @benhabib6 @_AdvanceUK
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recalls a past policy from when they were deputy leader of another party, stating that they would denounce the World Economic Forum, and asserts that there can be no good arising from the richest people in the world meeting the most powerful people in the world behind closed doors, without an agenda, without minutes, and without public scrutiny. They emphasize that such a gathering lacks transparency and accountability.
The speaker then shifts to a critique of a specific political figure, Mandelson, claiming that what has been seen with Mandelson is “the tip of the iceberg.” They argue that the reason Mandelson isn’t already in jail, and the reason he twice came back from political obscurity, was put back into office, ennobled, and made an ambassador, is because “the establishment is rotten to the core,” and that “the world’s gonna be a problem.”
Further, the speaker claims that someone takes money from a billionaire who is foreign-born in order to attend the World Economic Forum so he can speak on a program with Bloomberg, and states that such a person is “someone we should not be electing as prime minister of this country.”
The speech then transitions to prompting or signaling that there is a question to be addressed next, as indicated by the final remark, “We now have a question.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I I I I I can't I can't believe I went through the whole presentation without mentioning the World Economic Forum. But when I was deputy leader of another party, we had a policy that we would denounce the World Economic Forum. There can be no good no good there can be no good coming out of the richest people in the world meeting the most powerful people in the world behind closed doors without an agenda, without minutes, without the public eye on them. Yeah. Yeah.
I just want to say one more thing. Mandelson's what we've seen with Mandelson is the tip of the iceberg. The reason the reason Mandelson isn't already in jail, the reason he twice came back from political political obscurity, put back into office, ennobled, made an ambassador. The reason that all happened is because the establishment is rotten to the core, and the world's gonna be a problem. Who takes money from a billionaire, a foreign born billionaire to attend the World Economic Forum so he can speak on a on a program with Bloomberg is someone we should not be electing as prime minister of this country.
We now have a question
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Alberta is being strangled by Ottawa—blocked pipelines, crushed industry, ignored voters. He called Alberta a natural partner for the United States. Albertans are independent, resource-rich, energy-driven, and fed up with federal control. Talk of a referendum is moving into the mainstream; sovereignty becomes inevitable. Ottawa should be paying very close attention.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
https://t.co/WAocGUFgW7 🚨 THIS JUST SHOOK CANADA TO ITS CORE U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just said the quiet part OUT LOUD. On camera. Alberta — the energy engine of Canada — is being strangled by Ottawa. Blocked pipelines. Crushed industry. Ignored voters. And now Washington is openly acknowledging what millions of Albertans already feel: They don’t belong in a system that punishes prosperity. Bessent didn’t mince words: “Alberta is a natural partner for the United States.” That’s extraordinary. Not a pundit. Not a commentator. The U.S. Treasury Secretary. Albertans are independent. Resource-rich. Energy-driven. And fed up with federal control. Talk of a referendum is no longer fringe. It’s entering the mainstream. When people are denied the right to build, trade, and prosper — sovereignty becomes inevitable. Ottawa should be paying very close attention. Because when even America starts saying “they’d fit better with us”… The cracks are no longer theoretical. They’re visible.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I present this as evidence that what happened was a planned operation, not spontaneous protest. Don Lemon described a secret, live-broadcast operation; Nekima Levy-Armstrong confirmed “Operation Pull Up,” a clandestine plan to show up at a key location and disrupt a church during worship, while concealing details from the public. This was coordinated, openly admitted.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
https://t.co/ohULWOra9o 🚨 THIS IS THE EVIDENCE — IN THEIR OWN WORDS This is not protest. This is not spontaneous outrage. This was a planned operation — and they admitted it on camera. Don Lemon, moments before a church was targeted: • “They’re getting the operation together.” • “This is an operation that is a secret.” • “I can’t tell you what’s going to happen — but you’re going to watch it unfold live.” • “I turned the camera off because they’re giving critical information.” Then the organizer confirms it: Nekima Levy-Armstrong: • “This is Operation Pull Up.” • “This is a clandestine operation.” • “We show up at a key location they don’t expect.” • “Then we disrupt business as usual.” Let that sink in. A SECRET operation. A CLANDESTINE plan. A TARGETED location. Broadcast live — while concealing details from the public. And moments later? A CHURCH was laid under siege during worship. This wasn’t activism. This wasn’t free speech. This was coordination — openly admitted — carried out under media cover. Every American deserves to see this. Because when people tell you exactly what they’re doing — you should believe them.
Video Transcript AI Summary
They’re preparing for an operation described as secret, invited for viewers to watch unfold live on the Don Lemon Show. The scene includes many white participants and a note that their presence is tied to “white allies” for this particular operation. The participants explain that the operation, called “operation pull up,” is a clandestine effort in which they show up somewhere unannounced and disrupt business as usual.
Nakima Levy Armstrong, a civil rights attorney and longtime activist, explains the purpose and approach of the operation. She notes that they protest and engage in activism in many forms, and that this is a new iteration of their tactic: arrive at a location where they are not expected and disrupt the normal flow of activities. Armstrong confirms that “we’ve had a lot of success with the times we have done operation pull up.” She references past actions to illustrate their method and impact.
To illustrate, Armstrong cites several prior demonstrations:
- After George Floyd was killed, they went to the police federation head’s home and staged a demonstration there.
- They also went to the head of the U.S. Marshals from Minnesota after Winston Smith was killed by U.S. marshals.
- They went to actions following the killing of Daunte Wright, connected to the pursuit of accountability by then–Attorney General Keith Ellison (referred to as “AG Keith Ellis” in the dialogue).
The broadcast notes that the operation is being conducted in a way that might be perceived as MAGA-coded due to the visible presence of white participants, but emphasizes the stated reason for their composition of allies. At one point, the camera is turned away from a group to avoid revealing critical information.
As the segment progresses, the host confirms that they will not disclose exactly what is happening, but signals that the group is about to proceed with the planned disruption. Armstrong reiterates the aim of the clandestine operation and frames it as part of their ongoing tactic of drawing attention to civil rights and police accountability issues, with a history of successful actions in various high-profile cases.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're getting the operation together again. This is, an operation that is a secret that they invited, folks out. Can't tell you what is gonna happen, but you're gonna watch it live unfold here on the Don Lemon Show. There are this for this reason, our car looks the for this reason, it may look like MAGA coded, but there's a reason they have so many white people here. I'm just gonna be honest.
It's because of the the what they're the operation that they're doing today. It's important to have allies, as they said, white allies here. Zero five five. So that is what I could say. I turned our camera off of them because they're giving some critical information here.
But, there we go. Everybody's ready to go. Let's go. Okay. Alright.
Thank you, guys, for be thanks for for allowing me to be here.
Speaker 1: Coming to stop. Okay.
Speaker 0: Thank you, I'm out here. Alright. How are you? Good. See you.
We're we're on. We're not saying what what it is, what's going on, but Okay. Thank you. Tell us why you're doing this. So This is Nakima.
Levy Armstrong. She's on
Speaker 1: the show on Friday. Armstrong, civil rights attorney, longtime activist here in the community. And, you know, we protest and do activism in all kinds of ways. This is operation pull up, more of a clandestine operation. We show up somewhere location.
They don't expect us to come there, and then we disrupt business as usual. So that's what we're about to go do right now. We've had a lot of success with the times we have done operation pull up. Yeah. After George Floyd was killed, we went to the police federation head's, home and staged a demonstration there.
We also went to the head of the US marshals from Minnesota after Winston Smith was killed by the US marshals. We went there after Daunte Wright was killed when AG Keith Ellis
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I see damning, clear footage of Jake Lang being hunted and beaten for speaking in public, not for crime. This isn’t protest but political violence, with authorities backpedaling. Leaders demonize dissent and justify lawlessness, telling mobs they’re morally right. Free speech is beaten down one assault at a time. If this can happen here, it threatens us all.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
https://t.co/bhSKorEegu 🚨THIS IS THE CLEAREST FOOTAGE YET — AND IT’S DAMNING Jake Lang is surrounded, dragged, and beaten by a mob of left-wing anarchists in Minneapolis. Not for committing a crime. Not for attacking anyone. But for doing something the Constitution still guarantees: Speaking freely in public. What you’re watching is not protest. It’s political violence. A man exercising free speech is hunted by a mob — while authorities stand back and chaos reigns. This is what happens when leaders demonize dissent, excuse lawlessness, and portray political opponents as “enemies.” This is what happens when mobs are told they’re morally justified. Free speech doesn’t disappear overnight. It’s beaten out of people — one assault at a time. If this can happen to him in broad daylight, it can happen to anyone. And if this is allowed to stand, America is in far more danger than most people realize.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I see Clare Melford, head of GDI, barred from entering the U.S. for years of behind-the-scenes blacklisting, advertiser pressure, and deciding what voices are “acceptable” in the name of fighting disinformation. This wasn’t public protection—it was control of the narrative. When unelected activists ally with governments to suppress debate and label dissent as “hate,” they threaten American speech. The era of meddling foreign censorship is ending. Free speech isn’t extremism; questioning power isn’t disinformation. The censorship industry is being named and challenged.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 CENSORSHIP JUST HIT A WALL Clare Melford, head of the UK-based Global Disinformation Index, has reportedly been barred from entering the United States. For years, GDI worked behind the scenes to blacklist media, pressure advertisers, and decide which voices were “acceptable” — all under the banner of fighting disinformation. This wasn’t about protecting the public. It was about controlling the narrative. When unelected activists collaborate with governments to suppress debate, downgrade journalism, and label dissent as “hate,” they cross a line — especially when that pressure targets American speech. Now there are consequences. The era where foreign censors could meddle in free societies without pushback is ending. Free speech is not extremism. Questioning power is not disinformation. And the censorship industry is finally being named — and challenged.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I heard a Golani Brigade soldier testify that patrols were canceled along the Gaza border from 5:20 to 9:00 AM on October 7. This stand-down coincided with Hamas’s massacre. Who gave the order—negligence or betrayal? Israeli intel is strong, Egypt warned in advance, yet the border was left open. If this was incompetence, heads must roll; if intentional, trust is shattered. The victims deserve answers and justice.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 OCTOBER 7TH STAND-DOWN ORDER: WHO GAVE THE COMMAND? 🚨 A soldier from Israel’s elite Golani Brigade just testified before the Knesset: 🗣️ “We received direct orders to cancel all patrols along the Gaza border… from 5:20 AM to 9:00 AM. On October 7.” ❗That’s the exact window Hamas launched its savage massacre — crossing the border, murdering civilians, and taking hostages. ❗And there were no Israeli patrols to stop them. This wasn’t a breakdown. This was a stand-down. The question that now echoes through every Israeli home: Who gave the order? Was it negligence? Or something darker? 🧠 Israeli intelligence is among the most advanced in the world. 📡 Egypt warned Israeli officials days in advance. 🚫 And yet — on the morning of the worst attack in modern Israeli history… the border was left wide open. If this was incompetence, heads must roll. If this was intentional — the nation has been betrayed from within. 💥 The victims deserve answers. 💥 The families demand justice. 💥 And the truth will not stay buried. Because if October 7th was preventable, and wasn’t prevented — the entire strategic and moral foundation of the current leadership could crumble.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I watched Tucker Carlson with Alex Jones, and they reveal the Great Reset as a plan to control money, movement, speech, and existence. They warn of feudalism and say the elite want to own the world, not save it. They describe UN/WEF/banks merging toward a post-human, cashless order, with farmers crushed and freedoms eroded. Yet patriots are waking; Trump and Musk challenge the system. I stand with Freedom Train International—faith, family, energy, food, freedom. The reset can be stopped.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🔥 “THEY WILL DO ANYTHING TO DELETE THIS VIDEO” When Tucker Carlson sat down with Alex Jones, it wasn’t entertainment — it was revelation. The two exposed the endgame of The Great Reset: A system built to control not just your money, but your movement, your speech, and your existence. “They want feudalism — the purest form of economic slavery,” Jones warned. “It’s deliberate. The Great Reset isn’t about saving the planet — it’s about owning it.” Tucker called it what it is: the collision of finance, politics, and ideology — the final power grab of a collapsing global elite. WHAT THIS MEANS: • The UN, WEF, and global banks are merging to create a post-human, cashless world. • Farmers are being crushed, families demoralized, and free nations dismantled. • But the tide is turning — patriots are awake, and leaders like President Trump and Elon Musk are breaking their system. Jones and Carlson didn’t just expose corruption — they mapped the escape route. Faith. Family. Energy. Food. Freedom. That’s how humanity fights back. Freedom Train International stands with those who refuse digital slavery and choose sovereignty over submission. The Great Reset can be stopped — but only if we stand up now. @RealAlexJones @TuckerCarlson
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on a perceived collision of finance, politics, and ideology at the highest level, framing a looming “great reset” as a plan to control money, freedom of movement, and human existence. Tucker Carlson’s interview with Alex Jones is described as opening a door to a topic mainstream outlets avoid, with the question posed: how much time remains before the great reset becomes reality?
Key claims and points discussed:
- The global elite, including Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, the IMF, the World Bank, and the World Economic Forum, are portrayed as deciding in the last few years to “deal with monetary debt worldwide” through inflation, affecting corporate, governmental, and individual debt, with Trump’s stance described as accepting inflation alongside expansion of goods.
- The Great Reset is depicted as a plan by leftist UN, WEF elements to implement post-industrial, carbon tax policies that will yield stagflation (high inflation with ongoing recession), described as a “perfect storm of hell on earth.”
- The globalists allegedly want to create a worldwide system of “more manageable slaves” by breaking down borders, lowering all levels of economic status, and establishing small and rural city-states (reminiscent of a Hunger Games scenario) while tech and medicine are centralized above a devalued population; this is presented as the official policy for 2030.
- Depopulation and resource restriction are asserted as deliberate strategies to crash the world economy, enable bank loans to fund a new cashless system, and implement a social credit system. Carbon lockdowns and 15-minute cities are described as tools for totalitarian control.
- The UN’s and globalists’ aim is claimed to be feudalism or neo-feudal capitalism, a system where a few elites retain rights while others are stripped of them, an economic model presented as the oldest form of government being revived.
- Elon Musk is cited as recognizing the existential threat, and the importance of mobilizing political and legislative action is emphasized.
- The dialogue highlights high-level influence over policy, including John Kerry’s statements on cutting global farming, and the actions of global financial players like BlackRock. The depiction is that BlackRock’s influence over investment and ESG policies is being challenged by state-level pushback.
- Recent legal and political countermeasures are noted: attorney generals winning cases in Texas and elsewhere against BlackRock’s climate and fossil-fuel initiatives; states pulling pension funds from BlackRock; public admissions from Larry Fink and shifts away from certain ESG directives in some regions.
- The overarching narrative asserts that the aim is to demoralize free Western societies, to consolidate global power, and to ensure there is nowhere for free societies to escape to, thereby reinforcing a globalist control structure.
Overall, the discussion portrays a globalist scheme involving monetary manipulation, demographic and political restructuring, and technological and legal controls intended to establish a new world order, with mainstream opposition framed as insufficient and the West needing to resist to preserve freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When Tucker Carlson sits down with Alex Jones, you know something big is coming. But this time, it's beyond politics. It's a chilling warning about the end game of global power. A system designed not just to control your money, but your freedom, your movement, your very existence.
Speaker 1: When gold crosses 4,000, I don't understand why that's not like front page like, because to me that maybe and you're better at
Speaker 2: this than I, but that means that the cumulative effect of everything we're discussing has been to destroy the US dollar. When you read what even all Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, the IMF, the World Bank, the Ex I'm Bank, it's not even debated. They've decided the last really three, four years that they're gonna deal with monetary debt worldwide, both corporate, governmental, individual with inflation. And Trump recognizes that and has said, fine. We'll have inflation with expansion and expansion of goods.
And all the economists agree that that will have some pain, but overall will be something that could actually be successful. If you have the leftist UN, WEF, great reset, post industrial carbon tax plan, you will have stagflation, which is high inflation, but a ongoing recession depression, which is the perfect storm of hell on earth. And that is what the UN and the globalist directly want to create a worldwide surf system of more manageable slaves in their official policies, break down the borders with first world and third world, not to rise up the third world economically, but to lower everybody down to a level. And the globalist said they'll have small compact city states and rural city states like the hunger games where they have medicine technology and everything and then just basically fly above us and we're gonna be put into a agrarian situation with a much reduced world population. So that's the official great reset post industrial June 21, June 2030 policy.
And there's nothing more frustrating than than reading all their policy books and the legislation and the treaties, and and then and then seeing it carried out, is the purposeful plan depopulation the earth through slow starvation and and and resources being restricted and and the conflict that comes with when when resources are constricted.
Speaker 0: This isn't conspiracy. It's the collision of finance, politics, and ideology at the highest level. Tucker Carlson just opened the door for a conversation no one in the mainstream dares to have, and Alex Jones just kicked it off its hinges. The question now is simple. How much time is left before the great reset becomes the great reality?
Speaker 2: And then I see Trump massively increasing energy production and then going to Saudi Arabia and having them increase energy production, which hurts US oil production but helps the world in general lower inflation and get real money in the hands of people. That's the biggest benefit and then no tax on tips, no tax on overtime. All the things he's doing, 10,000,000,000,000 committed in in investment, several trillion already here. All of that is exactly what you do if you wanna help the people and build a middle class in a sustainable thriving country and world building back our morale and and and nationalism and the family and God. Trump gets an a plus on all of that, but he needs to get more on message and not say, oh, the left are idiots.
They don't know how to manage things. No. The globalists admit that they want a post industrial world. That's John Kerry said last year, we gotta cut off half the farming or people will starve. That's what causes starvation, obviously.
And they wanna cut the resources off so they can manage and control people. That's why in The Netherlands and in Ireland and in Sri Lanka, all over they're cutting off massive amounts of the farming, taking some of the best farming land ever and saying, your cows pass gas. It's bad for the earth. That is deliberate sabotage of the of the world economy to cause a collapse that the banksters can loan us more money, bring in a new cashless society, social credit score. That is the endgame plan.
And they talk about carbon lockdowns for the earth where you'll be told when you can leave your house. During carbon lockdowns, you'll be told when you can leave your fifteen minute city. This is a very totalitarian hellscape dystopia sci fi vision they have, and Trump is 95%, I would say, in opposition to it even with his limited understanding. He and by limited, mean, he's smart about the economy. He doesn't understand it's deliberate.
And he goes, oh, they're really dumb. These are the worst ideas I ever heard. Is that why they're all unified, decades getting them in place? Is that why the big banks and corporations are exempt? No.
It's feudalism. We don't have resources. We don't have rights. They all have the rights. That is the purest form of economic control.
It's the oldest form of government. It's been the most common form of government in world history, and the UN, the globalist say, we're bringing back feudalism, neo feudalistic capitalism is what they call it. But really, it's just slavery. And that's what we're opposing, and that's what the relaunch of the West is about. That's what Elon Musk understands.
That's why this is a do or die existential threat to everybody. People should just get on board. You understand, and you research the great reset, and you reset research Larry Fink, now the head of the World Economic Forum, you realize three years ago the UN made the World Economic Forum co equal to its governing body and its councils. And you understand if you actually read their writings, the future isn't human, people are bad, families are bad. We're gonna have these AI gods that take over.
I mean, is just the wildest thing that Lex Luther in a in a in a comic book couldn't come up with. This is beyond supervillain stuff. This is real super demon stuff, and you have to identify the attacks you're under and that it's deliberate. Then you have to mobilize and get good legislatures and governors and others elected. Populists are getting elected all over the world.
People are really waking up to this, and we have now these attorney generals winning court cases in Texas and other places where BlackRock tried to come in and say we're not gonna have any investment in your state if you don't get rid of fossil fuels. And we and and then Texas sued, compaction, so this is racketeering. This is illegal. They've won the court cases it is. Because Larry Fink says this is about control, and we're gonna control you.
And and they control us by managing our money. Well, now a bunch of states are pulling their pension funds from BlackRock. And now Larry Fink is seeing a different tune at least publicly, and they pulled some of their DEI and some of the ESG stuff, which is the corporate governance. When you wonder why whether you're in Australia, Germany, The US, or Canada, it's the same policies, the same programs, the same drag queen story times, the same take a knee during the national anthem. All of this comes out of them literally trying to demoralize us because we have a free open society.
People around the world are gonna want that, and you can't have a control group where there's some free prosperous Western nations. Everybody else slaves under BlackRock and the globalist. That's why you gotta take down the West so there's nowhere to run.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that Senator Ron Johnson claims federal health officials concealed vaccine risk signals, didn’t warn the public or doctors, and misused VAERS data. He cites 38,742 deaths in VAERS, with 9,252 occurring on or within one–two days of vaccination, says VAERS was trusted until results they didn’t like were exposed, and calls it thoroughly corrupted. He presents internal records and calls for accountability now.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
BOMBSHELL:🚨 SENATOR JOHNSON JUST REVEALED THE DATA THEY HID Senator Ron Johnson has now stated—on record—that federal health officials knowingly concealed vaccine risk signals instead of warning the public. His words were unambiguous: “They admitted there was a signal on myocarditis, and they hid it. They didn’t warn the public, they didn’t warn doctors.” Then he laid out the data straight from VAERS: “The VAERS system shows 38,742 deaths reported… and 9,252 of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination, or within one or two days.” He added that federal agencies initially promoted VAERS as a trusted safety surveillance system, until the results showed what they “didn’t like.” Johnson further stated: “It’s been thoroughly corrupted.” This is no longer a question of opinion, interpretation, or speculation. A sitting U.S. Senator—armed with millions of pages of internal agency records—is openly accusing officials of: hiding known safety signals failing to alert doctors withholding warnings from the public That is not a debate. That is testimony. And accountability now becomes inevitable.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that the committee now has over 8,000,000 pages of information. In the first tranche, they discovered that someone in the federal health agencies, through interagency communication, hid the signal and admitted there was a signal on myocarditis, but they hid it and didn’t warn the public or doctors. This is described as one instance of corruption and lies told by the CDC, with many more to be rolled out. He notes that they held their first hearing in permanent subcommittee investigation on that hiding of the signal myocarditis and that they have heard a lot of studies.
He mentions that, as he has looked into science, it has been thoroughly corrupted, and he requests to enter a data sheet into the record, saying he has been publishing this chart since early 2021. He references being on talk radio shows where they get deplatformed due to censorship in the Biden administration. He then presents what he calls “the facts” about the VAERS system, which was touted in October 2020 as a great safety surveillance system on COVID. A few months later, they denigrated their own system. Despite this, VAERS shows that there have been 38,742 deaths reported on VAERS worldwide associated with the COVID vaccine. He specifies that 9,252 of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination within one or two days.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My committee has got now over 8,000,000 pages of information. Just in the first tranche, by the way, what we discovered is that CD's somebody in the federal health agencies, this interagency communication, hid the signal. They admitted there was a signal on my architis, and they hid it. They didn't warn the public. They didn't warn doctors.
So that's just one instance of corruption and lies told by the CDC. We we're we've got a lot of others we'll be rolling out. Okay? So we held our first hearing in permanent subcommittee investigation on that hiding of the signal myocarditis. We've heard a lot of studies.
Okay? As I've looked into science, it's been thoroughly corrupted. Here's data, and I'd like to enter this sheet into the record. I've been publishing this chart for, you know, since really early twenty twenty one. When I'm on, for example, talk radio shows and they talk about this, they get deplatformed that they were, you know, because all the censorship in the Biden administration.
Here's the facts. The VAERS system that was touted in October 2020, it's this great safety surveillance system on COVID. Few months later, they didn't like the results, they started denigrating their own system. But VAERS shows that there have been thirty eight thousand seven hundred and forty two deaths reported on VAERS worldwide associated with COVID vaccine. Thirty eight thousand seven hundred forty two.
Nine thousand two hundred fifty two of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination within one or two days.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I speak as a British soldier who sacrificed for freedom and free speech, yet now see arrests for words and crimes by invaders ignored. You’re a disgrace to your uniform and an insult to mine. This moment cuts through all politics. Soldiers know sacrifice, duty, loyalty to the people, and betrayal when it’s seen. This is about truth, honour, and the nation we pledged to defend; history will judge silence harshly.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨A BRITISH SOLDIER SPEAKS FOR MILLIONS “I sacrificed my life to secure this country's freedom and its freedom of speech — and now you arrest people for words while turning a blind eye to crimes committed by invaders. You are a disgrace to your uniform and you are an insult to mine.” A moment like this cuts through everything. When a serving soldier—in full uniform—has to remind the police what this nation stands for, it proves just how far we’ve fallen. Britain’s armed forces understand sacrifice, duty, and loyalty to the people. They also see betrayal when it's unfolding right in front of them. This is not about politics. This is about truth, honour, and the survival of the nation our soldiers pledged their lives to defend. History will look back on these days, and those who stayed silent will not be remembered kindly.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that they sacrificed their life to secure this country’s freedom, specifically its freedom of speech. They accuse the addressed party of arresting people for words while turning a blind eye to crimes committed by invaders. They also condemn the addressed party as “a disgrace to your uniform, and an insult to mine.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I sacrificed my life to secure this country's freedom, and it's freedom of speech. And now you arrest people for words while turning a blind eye to crimes committed by invaders. You are a disgrace to your uniform, and you are an insult to mine.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that a top U.S. constitutional law professor testified in Berlin: only two people defended free speech at the World Forum, the rest demanded coordinated censorship across Europe and the U.S. He said European regulators want U.S. speech controlled by EU law, platforms face fines, international bodies push enforcement, and silence is globalized by regulation. He claimed Hillary Clinton urged the EU to weaponize the DSA after Musk’s Twitter, and warned censorship is being internationalized—through transnational power, not Washington law.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 WHAT A LEADING U.S. LAW PROFESSOR JUST REVEALED 🚨 A major warning was issued this week—not by activists, not by commentators, but by one of America’s leading constitutional law professors. He was just in Berlin, and what he described is chilling. He said only TWO people at the World Forum were defending free speech… and the rest of the room was demanding coordinated censorship—not just across Europe, but against Americans. And here is what he testified: European regulators want U.S. speech controlled by EU law Platforms are being threatened with ruinous fines International bodies now expect enforcement against U.S. citizens Silence is being globalised through regulation, not debate He also stated that Hillary Clinton personally intensified this push—calling on the EU to weaponise the Digital Services Act when Elon Musk acquired Twitter. Think about that: A former U.S. presidential candidate urging a FOREIGN authority to pressure an American company into censoring U.S. citizens. According to this professor, what is happening is not organic—it is strategic. He said the Berlin gathering was “the most anti-free-speech event” he had ever attended. He warned that: “This is how censorship becomes internationalised.” Not through law in Washington. Not through court rulings. But through transnational regulatory power overriding domestic rights. As he put it: “Free speech isn’t falling—it’s being dismantled.” This is not speculation. This is testimony—firsthand—from someone who was in the room. Defending free expression is no longer optional—it is urgent. @JonathanTurley
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that free speech is not a free fall in Europe, contending that two anti free speech movements have coalesced. One movement is in Europe, which has “laid waste to free speech” in countries such as Germany, France, and England, and also in places like Canada. The other movement is described as the US anti-free-speech movement, which began in higher education and then metastasized throughout the government, but which has “all reached our shores now.”
The speaker notes that the Berlin World Forum followed remarks on free speech by Vice President Vance, and that the EU was “red hot.” They describe the forum as “the most anti free speech gathering I’ve ever been part of,” with only two attendees from the free speech community, but those present are “committed.” Hillary Clinton is identified as being there and said to have fueled the anger.
A key claim is that when Twitter was purchased by Elon Musk, Clinton called on the EU to use the Digital Services Act, described as “one of the most anti free speech pieces of decades,” to force censorship of American citizens and to compel people like Musk to censor. The speaker characterizes this as “an extraordinary act by someone who was once a presidential candidate in The United States,” and asserts that Clinton’s position reflects a commitment to censorship.
The speaker further claims that after the World Forum, this effort was globalized, and that they are “threatening companies like ACTS with ruinous fines unless they resume censoring American citizens.” The overall message emphasizes a belief that anti free speech forces are expanding globally, using regulatory tools such as the Digital Services Act to compel censorship and penalize platforms that do not comply, with the World Forum acting as a catalyst for broader international pressure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Free speech isn't a free fall in Europe. There are two anti free speech movements that have coalesced. Mhmm. One is in Europe where it has laid waste to free speech. Germany, France, England.
Free speech has been eviscerated and also places like Canada. The US anti free speech movement began in higher education, then metastasized throughout the government. But this has all reached our shores now. The Berlin World Forum followed the remarks of vice president Vance on free speech, and the EU was red hot. They gathered in Berlin.
And it was the most anti free speech gathering I've ever been part of. There's only two of us from the free speech community. And they are committed. And, you know, Hillary Clinton was there. And she really fueled the anger.
I mean, when Twitter was purchased by Elon Musk, she called on the EU to use the infamous Digital Services Act, which is one of the most anti free speech pieces of legislation in decades. And she called upon the EU to use the DSA to force the censorship of American citizens, force people like Musk to censor. It's an extraordinary act by someone who was once a presidential candidate in The United States. But they are committed to it. And after the World Forum, they further globalized this effort, and they are threatening companies like ACTS with ruinous fines unless they resume censoring American citizens.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I am Hayden Appleby, a 19-year-old British journalist warning the UK’s collapse. I argue freedoms were shredded in COVID, education is a propaganda machine, police arrest for speech, justice is politicized, elites produce illegal immigration, taxpayers are drained, Labour erodes civil liberties, and the BBC is corrupt. This is a warning, not a rant: DIVIDED WE FALL, UNITED WE STAND. More speech, not less, will win.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨EXCLUSIVE: THE YOUNG BRIT WHO JUST EXPOSED THE TRUTH ABOUT THE UK’S COLLAPSE What happened in this interview was bigger than politics. Bigger than left vs right. Bigger than party loyalty. A 19-year-old British journalist — Hayden Appleby — just delivered one of the most blistering, clear-eyed takedowns of the modern UK establishment you will hear anywhere. And he did it with a level of clarity, courage and conviction that puts half of Westminster to shame. Hayden laid it out: • Britain’s freedoms were shredded during COVID • The education system has become a propaganda machine • Police now arrest citizens for speech • The justice system is compromised by political influence • Illegal immigration is a threat created by the elites — not the people • British taxpayers are bled dry while foreign causes are funded • The Labour government is actively dismantling core civil liberties • The BBC is collapsing under the weight of its own corruption This wasn’t a rant. It was a warning — backed by lived experience from a young man who watched his own generation be broken, silenced and betrayed. And then he said the line that will stay with people: “DIVIDED WE FALL, BUT UNITED WE STAND.” He’s right. The enemy is not our neighbour. Not our colleague. Not the person who disagrees with us online. The enemy is the elite class that lies, censors, gaslights, enriches itself, and destroys national identity while calling it “progress.” Hayden’s message to the world was simple and powerful: Keep speaking. Keep questioning. Keep uniting. Because more speech — not less — is how we win. Britain needs voices like his. The West needs voices like his. The future belongs to young people with this level of courage. And as the world gets darker… we get brighter. @haydenappleby
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jim Fergus hosts a conversation with Hayden Appleby, a young British journalist based in Essex who runs a channel that started as a podcast and now shares social-media clips. Appleby describes his work as discussing issues facing the UK, the US, and Europe, and he emphasizes attacks on freedom by “collective governments” and the need for free debate. He says freedom was brought into sharp relief during COVID, notably bodily autonomy, movement, and free expression, and that the education system functions as a propaganda machine with set topics and messages that push one side of an argument and stigmatize dissent. He contends English, math, and science curricula are infused with messaging, including a portrayal of capitalism as negative, and he argues that younger people should speak up and engage in debate rather than simply follow established views.
Fergus notes his recent activities in Europe, including Berlin’s Corona Symposium and a brief speech in the EU Parliament, and he encourages viewers to follow Appleby on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok, with Appleby highlighting Instagram for clips and X for thoughts.
A central theme of the discussion is freedom and censorship. Appleby asserts that the UK currently faces a global standing where independent journalists and ordinary people risk arrest for online statements, contrasting that with the past, when cancel culture led to job or funding losses, whereas the present era sees people jailed for online expressions that are not incitements to violence. He argues that freedom of expression should be protected “under all circumstances besides the direct incitement of violence,” criticizing the notion that indirect or contextual statements can be punished and pointing to authorities such as the CPS, police, and councils acting in concert to target journalists and ordinary citizens. He cites incidents of a comedian being confronted by armed officers and suggests a broader trend of suppressing dissent.
When discussing political leadership, both speakers critique the Labour government and the Conservative Party as beholden to a globalist agenda, arguing that leadership has betrayed British citizens by redirecting resources abroad and away from domestic priorities. They criticize “globalist governments” for prioritizing others over British citizens, and they condemn increasing taxation and policies perceived as punitive toward those who work hard, including high taxes and policies affecting home ownership. Appleby argues that rising costs, inflation, and taxation, including a proposed “leveling up tax,” threaten households and small businesses, and he contends that millions of high-net-worth individuals have emigrated in response to policy changes.
The conversation touches on media bias, with Appleby decrying the BBC as biased and unethical, citing past instances of manipulation and alleged corruption, including the organization’s treatment of Trump. They discuss the potential removal of trial by jury, as proposed by Deputy Prime Minister David Lamy, and the concern that politically appointed judges could replace juries, eroding private citizens’ rights and sovereignty.
In the US context, Marco Rubio and President Trump designated Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization, and Rubio and Trump also labeled the Muslim Brotherhood as a prescribed terrorist organization. Appleby supports designating Antifa due to its violence and intimidation, and he condemns mass illegal immigration as a perceived threat to Western civilization, arguing it compromises safety and national cohesion. He condemns “catch and release” immigration policies and advocates for stronger border controls to protect citizens.
The dialogue explores concerns about civil conflict, drawing on Professor David Betts’s warning that demographic shifts and rising crime could lead toward intergroup conflict or civil war within a few years. Appleby agrees that while he does not want conflict, persistent crime and division could heighten tensions, urging peaceful political solutions and unity.
Towards the end, Appleby urges continued public discourse and unity in defending freedom, warning that elites inside the establishment are not representative of the majority, and he emphasizes that “more speech is what is needed, not less.” He thanks Jim Fergus for the interview and invites audiences to stay engaged and keep talking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, thanks very much indeed. Welcome to the show. I am Jim Fergus. I've got a a great friend to the channel. He's a young British journalist.
His name is Hayden Appleby. Hayden, great to see you, mate. How are getting on?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Thanks so much for having me, Jim. It it really is brilliant. As we discussed just before we started there, I really enjoyed the last interview that we had. I think we we covered a whole plethora of issues that that are affecting The UK and actually that I think are affecting the entire West.
And I think we primarily touched on an establishment an establishment, you know, not not Labour, not Tory, not but an establishment of corrupt, of greedy individuals who are not just politicians that are constantly raining down upon us. So it's great to be here again. I'm sure there's a whole host of more maybe similar also issues that we can touch on.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. First of all, I would be grateful because we've had a lot of new members come to the channel. Maybe they didn't see our last interview. So maybe you could just say a little bit about yourself, where you're located, what you do.
Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely. So I am Hayden Appleby. I am based in Essex in in Britain, and I essentially started around two years or so ago a channel. It it originally started as a podcast. I now do more kind of social media quick clips.
But what it is is it's discussing all the issues that we are facing. I don't just touch on The UK. I also touch on The US. I'm very interested in what's going on over there, in their politics, in their culture, and everything kind of society based. And Europe, the West as a whole, it really explores what's going on, the attacks that we are facing from collective governments time and time again, The attacks on freedom.
Freedom is something that I feel was really brought to a head during COVID. But I think that was important because it woke so many of us up because we took it for granted, you know, living in The UK, living in The US, we took freedom for granted. We're never going to be China. We're never going to be North Korea. And then during COVID, we saw absolutely disgraceful authoritarian attacks on bodily autonomy, on the right of movement, the right of free expression.
And that is when, I mean, I was only 14, 15 at the time, but that's when I looked at it and I was like, this isn't right. This isn't right. I was listening to what my elders were saying, I was listening to what ancestors were saying, I was listening to veterans, and they were saying, this isn't right. This is what we fought against. And so I thought that instead of these wonderful people who have lived here for decades, who have already contributed for decades, constantly being the ones to stand up for freedom.
It's actually time that we do, that youngsters do, and there's too many of us that kind of just just move with the times. Know, we go to school, we live in this dystopian society, and we don't speak up. We don't actually know enough. And so my intention is through my social medias, I primarily exist on Instagram because I think that's where lots of young people are, on X and on YouTube and TikTok also. And I try to bring the message on every topic and encourage free debate because that is what that that is what is under attack constantly.
It's under attack in the education system. And I was watching too many of my peers be funnelled in and out of this system where we have the exact same views. And if you show any dissent, if you do not align with those views, and I will say the education system, I say this in every interview I do, every clip I do, it's a propaganda machine. I've seen it firsthand over the course of many years. You have set topics, set subjects that teach essentially propaganda, that teach one side of a viewpoint, one side of an angle.
And then you also have, even in your traditional subjects like English, maths, science, underlying the content, there's messaging. There's messaging. You are taught, for example, in English to absolutely despise capitalism, to absolutely despise free enterprise. And if you don't come out of school, I say, as a green haired, insane leftist who actually hates others, like has resentment towards those they disagree with, then you've done a good job.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, I have to say we're we're very closely aligned. And I mean, the fact that you're taking a big interest in Europe and The United States sits very, very well with me because I do too. I'm just back from Europe. I was in Berlin at the corona symposium there.
Hundreds and hundreds of people there, top doctors, scientists, professors. And then I was speaking briefly in the EU parliament at the invitation of members of the European Parliament there. So, there's a lot going on. I mean, I certainly absolutely would, recommend that people follow you on X and all those other platforms. I mean, remind us where they can actually find your work.
Speaker 1: So I'm under Hayden Applebee basically on every platform, and the best places to follow me, I would say, are Instagram and X currently. There's YouTube and TikTok as well, but I really focus solely on Instagram and X. X, you will get get a lot of thoughts as they come. And Instagram, you will get more clips.
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, I mean, there's a lot to talk about. And, I think one of the things that that's pressing in a lot of people's minds is freedom and censorship. I mean, we've got 12,000 independent journalists and people who have been put in prison. Our friends in America cannot believe what they're they're seeing, people being arrested for posts on social media for speaking out against things like mass illegal immigration or the unfair two tier justice system that Starmer is waging against the the British population.
So there's a lot of interest in Britain. Trump, Trump's mother was Scottish. Elon Musk has a big interest. He loves the the Brits as do a lot of our American friends and European friends and allies, of course, as well. And as a young person, I think it's important that the older generations take on board what younger people are thinking, and how they're feeling about the whole, sort of mishmash of of socialist ideology that's coming out from Starmer and his minions.
And what are the what would you say would be the biggest challenges facing the younger younger generations in The UK right now?
Speaker 1: I would say, I mean, there's a number of challenges that have been thrown our way financially, socially, culturally. But I think so far, I'm completely on the same page. Whenever anybody asks me what's the most important issue that you're fighting for right now, it is freedom. Freedom. And that comes in many forms.
Freedom, of course, of bodily autonomy, freedom to travel, freedom to protest. But my most important fight right now is freedom of speech and freedom of expression because you are correct. We are currently the joke of the world. We are currently laughed at, mocked and actually, I mean, looked at in shock and just disgust by the rest of the world when they see how many people you're right. I mean, we used to have cancel culture where you would lose your job, would lose your funding if you said, you know, controversial things, things that were a little bit anti establishment.
Now you will be behind bars, and we're not just talking weeks, we're talking individuals sent to prison for years, Jim, for things they have said online, things that often are not inciting violence, things that are construed, I say, as indirect violence because this is the current trend, you know. To me, freedom of expression should be free under all circumstances. Some people think this is an extreme position, but under all circumstances besides the direct incitement of violence. Because right now what we're seeing is this indirect trend where they're saying, you know, oh, well, it's implied that that, you know, we should harm others. And often, it's not implied.
Someone will say, we need to stand up. Well, no no place in that comment did they say we need to hurt one another. However, comments are being misconstrued, manipulated, like the BBC, which we will touch on I'm sure, to appear to be violent. And really what they're doing is they are shutting people up. They're shutting people up who stand up to them.
And it's really scary how the CPS and the justice system and the government and the councils have worked in collusion to send police to the door of journalists. Send police to the door, not even just of journalists, of everyday mums and dads and family members who have said something online, something online maybe in the spare of the moment or even something online that was a perfectly fair statement. It's really scary actually how many people have been arrested. It's really scary when a comedian faces five armed police officers at the airport simply because of something he said about trans people. That is terrifying and that is what we should be hearing from communist nations, not from The UK.
And so that's what I worry about most with my generation growing up, you know, because young people, they're supposed to be anti things. They're supposed to see things and say that's not right and stand up to it. And now now there's a threat that we can have the police at our door while that's happening, while the police will be everywhere but a real crime incident. It's really concerning. So crime is an issue.
Financial issues, there's millions of them. Know, ability of young people to get on the property ladder and save money right now is frankly impossible because time and time again, hard workers are punished to give to those who do not work at all. It's the playbook of the Labour government, but it's also the playbook of all governments, really, that make up this establishment, is punish and tax the hell out of those who work hard, those who manage to build something, those who manage to build businesses, for example. And then we will give it to those who do not work or those who do not work hard enough. Or we will give it to foreign nations or we will give it to illegal migrants or we'll give it to everyone and anyone but British citizens and young people who are finding it impossible to move out, who are finding it impossible to make big purchases, who are finding it impossible to start businesses because why bother?
Like, why bother starting a business when if you manage to grow, you're facing 45% income tax rates. Like, that is ludicrous. That is half of your paycheck taken by the government. And yet, I can't drive to work without falling down millions of potholes. So you ask yourself, where is the money going?
And that is the biggest concern right now is really globalist governments. Governments giving to everyone but us and taking from us to do so. Back when you read books, that would have been deemed treason to take from your citizens to give to other citizens who are breaking your laws or who are committing war crimes or who are doing everything that that British citizens don't necessarily support. It's it's so wrong. It's really putting us last.
It's a Britain last ideology, and it's a young people last ideology.
Speaker 0: Absolutely right. I I agree with every word you've said there. And and to sort of add into the fact that we've got now David Lamy, who is the deputy prime minister in The UK, who is now talking about doing away with trial by jury. I I I I mean, you couldn't make it up. It would be laughable if it wasn't so dystopian and serious.
He's talking about taking away British people's right for trial by jury and that the, politically appointed judges will be the ones that would be the the judge and the jury if effectively. So, I mean, that doesn't lend itself to freedom in this country or to real justice. We've seen a lot of injustice going on as you quite correctly pointed out. What's your thoughts when you hear David Laramie talking about doing away with trial by jury?
Speaker 1: I would say a phrase that I often use is shocking but inevitable. So it's really shocking that this is happening, it's shocking that we're hearing this, but it's not surprising because there's a difference there. We can take shock value from something this government's doing, but we're not actually surprised. You know, it's inevitable. It's terrifying as well.
Mean, taking away trial by jury, we look at these judges, these judges who often are the same judges who are, as you say, appointed in connection with the CPS, have had a legal education that is bound with leftism as it is now. They will sit there and they will fight for the rights and the mitigating factors of those who commit the worst crimes, you know. But what about their childhood? But what about what they went through? Or but but what about their nationality or their income?
You know, you sexually abuse a child, I I don't really care what what your nationality or your income or whatever you went through was. What most British citizens would say is that person needs to go down for a very long time. And we have had far too many examples of this not happening of individuals committing what most people would deem the worst crimes and getting the most lenient sentences, getting the most lenient consequences while, as we just touched on, everyday British citizens who speak out of line are sent down at times for years. So the idea that we're going to give these judges more power, give them more power over the common law to send those that maybe they don't like, maybe that they're receiving pressure from certain individuals in the establishment to push down and send them down for however long they wish, however long they can kind of fix from previous legislation, from previous case law, and then to, I mean, send other British citizens down for longer. It's very scary that we're gonna hand these people more power, that we're gonna hand away our sovereignty because this is what trial by jury is about.
It's about those 12 jurors disagreeing, those 12 jurors acknowledging all the facts of the case and saying, oh, but hold up. You know? He did go through this or she did go through this, but, you know, is there enough evidence that he or she has done this? It is what the entire basis of British justice lies on. You know, trial by jury is the fairest way to me.
It's the fairest way to ensure that we cannot have corrupt influence in trials. And that's what we're having. We are having corrupt influence in trials. You see it more when it is just judges who are making decisions. And so I am completely unsurprised by a decision by a corrupt totalitarian government to hand more power to judges.
That that's not surprising remotely, but it is shocking. I'm shocked time and time again that this government called themselves a Labour government, that they claim to stand for the people. And yet time and time again, not just do they take from the people, take the resources from the people, but they take the freedom from the people again and again and again.
Speaker 0: I think Sir Keir Hardy, who started the Labour movement, was a fellow Scot back in the day would be horrified at what, the present day Labour Party and now government have become. But also the Conservative Party as well are pretty much conservative in name only. They they've lost their way a long time ago, and we've seen successive prime ministers all the way back, including Theresa May and others who have basically sold Britain out to the globalist agenda. But there's been a lot of collusion going on with the mainstream media as well. And the BBC got caught recently, faking news concerning president Trump and what he said during the January 6 protests and all the things that went on.
Now they've come out and they've apologized. Trump's not having it. He's talking about suing the BBC for a billion dollars. What's your thoughts on that?
Speaker 1: Well, again, I mean, shocking but not surprising. This is the BBC, and so many people right now I mean, it's it's great because clearly it's a little bit of a wake up call for British citizens. Suddenly, they're going, oh my goodness. The bastion of Britain, the BBC, has done something so manipulative.' And many of us sit here and we think that this is nothing. Like, the BBC slicing together a clip that's fifty minutes apart from the same speech and manipulating the way in which it sounds.
That's nothing compared to what the BBC has done historically. I mean, this is an organisation that has repeatedly called the British population far right and racist to our faces. This is an organisation that in the wake just a few days after the political assassination of Charlie Kirk called him far right. Like, this organisation is absolutely tainted with bias and corruption and influence. There is no impartiality at all.
And yet, it's this that gets the outrage. Like, it's them slicing together a Trump clip. Like, yeah, of course, it's outrageous, but it's far from the worst they've done. This is an organisation that protects and harbours bad people. Like, this is the organisation that harboured Hugh Edwards, Jimmy Savile.
This is the organisation that lies repeatedly. So, yeah, I mean, it's awful that they've done this to president Trump. And frankly, I hope he burns them to the ground because they are not a national institution. This is the defence we are hearing time and time again is, you know, you cannot possibly be a patriot if you support a foreign president coming for a British institution. I do not consider a British institution an institution this tainted with lack of ethics, this tainted with a lack of truth, a lack of transparency.
Are I mean, slanted is the best way of putting it. They are slanted, but frankly, they're influenced and they're corrupt from the inside. Again, an institution that potentially when it was first formed maybe had some value. But now an institution that you can be arrested if you don't pay when you don't support the lies they're peddling. So, of course, they seem to be crumbling from the inside.
I mean, management seem to be resigning and stepping down. You have president Trump threatening these lawsuits, all of which is great because finally the British are seeing it. You know, people who perhaps didn't see what the BBC did during COVID, perhaps haven't seen what the BBC has done historically. Now the President of The United States is threatening to sue them. I mean, it's quite hard to cover that one up.
So it's great that people are seeing it, but, like, I mean, they should have seen it sooner.
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, the the BBC were the gold standard. The the BBC World Service, for example, were the gold standard in journalism, not anymore. In fact, they've gone completely the opposite. And as you say, a lot of people, still get chased to pay the the license fee, and people in our our friends in America and other places say you actually have to pay a license fee to watch the BBC whether you watch them or not. Just because you've got a television, that's crazy.
And and I I I tell people all the time, there's a process to inform the BBC that you no longer watch them. You're no longer watching television, which is another major propaganda tool. Get rid of it and and stop funding their their propaganda because it's no use. Now we're gonna come out to some other things. Don't go away.
We're gonna go for a quick break. We'll be right back. In today's world, privacy is power. Every time you go online, your data, your location, and even your browsing habits are exposed. And believe me, the globalists, corporations, and even hackers are watching closely more than ever.
That's why I strongly recommend using a VPN. And not just any VPN, I personally trust NordVPN. They are the fastest, they have military grade encryption, and they have a strict no logs policy, meaning they don't track or store what you do online. With NordVPN, you can protect your devices, your freedom, and your privacy wherever you are in the world. I've partnered with NordVPN, and if you use my affiliate link, you'll get an exclusive deal to get protected today.
Freedom starts with securing your digital life. Don't wait until it's too late. Click the link. Stay safe and stay free. Freedom Train International.
Don't be scared. Be prepared. And welcome back. I'm here with Hayden Appleby. Hayden, we're talking we're just talking about the BBC and censorship and all the kind of dystopian things that are going on.
I want to move, and take a look because I know you have a big interest in our friends across the pond in The United States America as well. There's been some big news coming out of America. Marco Rubio from the State Department, President Trump have said some big statements recently. First of all, he has designated Antifa, the far left, radical group who are extremely violent as a domestic terrorist organization. Now Antifa are pretty much every nation.
They're in The UK. They're in Europe. They're in America. And that that's big news in itself. The Netherlands have also voted to ban them and designate them as a domestic terrorist organization.
But he's now come out and also said that the Muslim Brotherhood are now designated as a prescribed terrorist organization. And on the hot heels of that, Mark Rubio and president Trump have said that there is a threat now to the entire Western civilization due to mass illegal immigration. And what he's now started to do, for example, in Australia, he's told The U the United States Embassy in Australia to start to record all the crimes that are being committed and the nationalities of those who are doing it. So it looks like there's some big moves to push back against this this strange phenomenon that's been plaguing our nations for many decades. What do you make of all those three particular points?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, super interesting, Jim. I mean, first and foremost, with Antifa and, you know, designating them as a terrorist organization, to me, makes sense. I mean, we designate I mean, when we look at terrorist organisations and we look at the way they operate, they operate with extremism, with extremist ideology and the very ideology of Antifa, you know, is one of lies.
Like, it's one of real deception. They engage you by saying they are anti extremism. Right? They are anti fascists. They are anti we're all anti fascism.
Like, that's great. And yet, within the way they operate is with extremism, arguably with forms of fascism, where those they disagree with, those who criticize certain ideas or just share certain ideas, those who are against anything that isn't, as you mentioned, far left. I mean, center left ideas sometimes. And people will come for you and they will absolutely not show mercy. I mean, they will come to your place of work.
They will come to you. You know, heard news many years ago that they kind of confronted the late Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens, and they would storm them when they were in restaurants and they would be very aggressive. That that's I mean, that's not just one example. There's millions of examples when antifa have shown violence and not not just not just verbally, but physically to opponents and to those they disagree with. And, course, unfortunately, this year is quite a topical year for political violence from the far left and political violence of any form is just hideous.
It's it's like an ill an illness and a disease that should be ridded entirely. I hate the idea that we have to resent those we disagree with. It's one of the darkest things that's plaguing young people, actually. I should have mentioned that earlier, not just the attacks on freedom, but the way in which we are taught to hate others, to hate those on the left, to hate those on the right. And that is what infiltrates Antifa, is hatred and is resentment of those they disagree with, especially in particularly, of course, those who lie more on the right.
And so given their violent history, given the way they act, given the way they despise often those that they disagree with, of course, that is a very threatening organization to have in any nation. So as far as I can tell, I mean, good move from Rubio and Trump, and I support that. Additionally, you know, when we look at mass illegal immigration as a whole as a wider topic, that is a I mean, when it's permitted, even promoted by a government of a nation, that is to me a form of treason against that nation. I know I've used that word twice, and I don't want to, like, demote the weight that it carries. Of course, treason is an an insane allegation.
And you don't just get treason because you disagree with me. But to allow tens of thousands of individuals who you do not know. You do not know these people from Adam. You do not know whence from they came. You do not know, you know, the kind of beliefs or values that they hold, And you do not know what they have and haven't done, have or haven't got with them, or the ideology that they hold, or the terrorist organisations they're a part of.
And when you allow these people en masse to enter a country, to enter a country without any form of security, and then when you catch them, you release them and you just book them a court date. When you allow that, which is what we saw the Biden administration do on a massive scale, was catch and release. And when you allow that en masse, I mean, when you allow that at all, but especially the huge levels that we are currently seeing in all of Europe, really, in The UK, which, of course, we were seeing in The US. When you allow that, that is to me a form of treason. You are not just putting a country last.
I mean, that's one thing, to give money to everyone but your own nation. But what you're doing is you're coming for the most important thing, which isn't the money of your citizens. It isn't, you know, what they can and can't do. It isn't their jobs. It isn't the economy.
It's their safety. It's their ability to allow their children to walk to school. It's their ability the ability of women to actually walk at night, you know, not even at night, at 6PM home from work. It's the ability of British citizens to not feel bloody terrified with anything and everything they do in the country in which they live and the country in which their ancestors have lived. I mean, surely it's fair.
Surely, the first priority of government is to protect its citizens before you worry about the economy, before you worry about, you know, taxation and policy. Protect your citizens from crime, surely. Protect your citizens from foreign criminals. Every crime, Jim, I I say this often, every crime committed by an illegal migrant was entirely preventable. Of course, any and every crime can be preventable in some way, you know.
Oh, maybe if this didn't happen to that person, they wouldn't have done it. Maybe if they weren't intoxicated, they wouldn't have done it. But a crime committed by an illegal national is entirely preventable. If we had common sense border policy, if we had common sense immigration policies, it never would have happened. British citizen would still be alive.
This British citizen would still have their dignity. Whatever it may be, crimes can be prevented by securing a border. A lot of people think it's intolerant, you know, to prevent mass illegal immigration. A lot of people think that's not loving. That's, you know, that's what the left is driven by.
That's what antifa and organisations like it are driven by these days is the idea of love. You know, love for your neighbor, love for others. Love they are manipulating that word because it is not love to allow anybody and everybody to enter a nation. One more thing. If you have your house, you lock your door at night.
Everyone locks their door at night. I don't know anyone who doesn't lock their door at night. And they don't do it because they hate those on the outside. They do it because they have enough common sense to realise that unfortunately, there is a minority of people on the outside who are not well meaning, who are not ethical and who do not share their values, who will come and try to steal things or, God forbid, hurt them and their family. And we're allowing that with a country.
And a country is much scarier than a house because it's not one house. It's millions of houses. It's millions of streets. It's millions of institutions in which we are allowing these people to enter who, unfortunately, too often than not, don't share our values, Who come from nations where you are stoned to death if you disagree with the government. Who come to nations, come from nations apologies, where you are attacked, hung, killed if you show skin.
I mean, these are the kind of people who are coming to a nation in The UK where quite frankly we are now unfortunately too liberal in the skin we show. It's like we're allowing all these people in and that should be a concern. And acknowledging that is a concern, unfortunately, nowadays can lead the police at your front door, and that's so wrong. British citizens have a right to stand up for their safety, and it needs to be discussed.
Speaker 0: It does. And I'm one of the people who are doing a lot of discussions or giving a lot of presentations and discussions about this very thing. I don't know if you've come across him. His name is Professor David Betts from the War College here in London. He's an academic.
He's not the kind of person that you would have expected to start speaking out. He's given advice to the government. What he's warning about is the actual potential for civil war in The United Kingdom, And he goes into depth about it, and he explains why, but he also came up with the the term a dirty war. So civil wars are where fathers are against sons, neighbors are against neighbors, and all that type of thing. But he's saying that the demographics of Britain, is changing so radically, so quickly that he sees, interfactional and, sort of intercity fighting breaking out with extreme violence with extreme violence.
He's not the kind of person that is a sort of a scaremonger. He's a very methodical professor who looks at the data, who looks at the facts, but he's speaking out more and more and more. When you see people of his stature warning that The UK is heading potentially for a situation where there could be some kind of civil war taking place, what's your thoughts on that? And can you see that? And by the way, I should say before I get you to ask that question, he said this isn't we're not talking twenty years down the line or thirty years down the line.
He is saying within the next two to three years, this could become a reality. What's your thoughts on that?
Speaker 1: Wow. Wow. I mean, he clearly has done his research, and whether that time scale is correct or not, I am in complete agreement that if the country continues to head, you know, there is never a definite. You know, we can always hope that truth will win. We can always hope that a government that cares about its people may come into play.
But if the country was to continue to head in the direction in which it is, then, yeah, I truly believe that civil war is not a far fetched option, is not a far fetched reality. And people believe that it is, right, because it's it's a big term and the idea of war within The UK seems far fetched. But what what seems farfetched anymore? Because we have had full blown totalitarianism in The UK. So the idea that a country in which you have communities living on top of each other that share values so opposing that they actually want to harm one another.
How is that ludicrous to suggest that those communities could harm one another? And right now, a huge issue we've faced, especially this year that we've seen time and time again, is major crimes. We had the train stabbing in Cambridgeshire in which 10 people were stabbed on a train. I mean, that pisses off a population. When you have children, of course, the tragic Taylor Swift event, which was actually a long time ago now, it seems, but in which children were murdered by Axel Rudakavana.
I mean, that is just incredibly dark and there is nothing that frustrates, not frustrates, but angers a population more than children being harmed. And so when you allow this to continue happening, we saw the summer riots last year, and when you allow it to happen time and time and time again, what of course is gonna happen is it's bubbling. It's bubbling. And when things keep bubbling, they eventually burst. They eventually explode.
And that is why I don't think that's a crazy suggestion. The idea of civil war just means war among individuals within the country. Factions, as you say, of individuals within the country, which is not a ludicrous suggestion. We have Sharia courts. I mean, we have institutions being built in The UK that UK values, British values oppose.
And so, of course, it's a scary suggestion. And I recently actually had a video go viral in which I started with there is going to be a civil war, and that was after the incident on the train. And that is because we have just had crime after crime after crime, and when the public doesn't feel safe, then they have nothing left to lose. And so I don't want a civil war, to be very clear. I would far prefer we just had leaders that actually put us first.
But when we have, unfortunately, leaders that are not doing so, that are continuously putting our lives at risk and allowing conflict and division to rise, well, the inevitable result of conflict and division is violence and war, unfortunately. And so I plead, I I really do plead with British citizens to stay peaceful because I promise that the division will only bubble more if you start hurting one another. That's never the solution. But, unfortunately, no matter how much we plead, when someone loses their child, they really have nothing left to lose. And so I do not want, but I do fear that that may be a result.
Speaker 0: I I very much agree. And I think that what we saw in Southport, the the killings there, I think that that that brought the nation really, out. It would just take something else like that, I think, to potentially push people to the point where they say, well, you know what, we're just not having it. But I agree that that violence is not the way. Let's hope that we can get a political solution, to what's going on in the country because Dava Starmer has chosen Davos over Westminster.
He's he's on record for saying he would rather hang be hanging out with the World Economic Forum than the parliamentarians in Westminster. So, I think for every reason that you stated, we we need a change in The United Kingdom politically to put these matters right. I wanna go back to something that you were talking about because the financial pressure on young people, the financial pressures on everybody actually are on a whole other level. We've seen rising food prices. We've seen rising fuel and energy costs.
Once again, the government are continually sending billions of hard working taxpayers' money abroad to Zelensky, who's stuffing it into his pockets. He's one of the most corrupt people, I think, on the planet. Yet there's no end in sight to the drain on British finances, all the while Rachel from accounts is preparing her budget today. And and and I want to sort of get your thoughts on where you think that could lead. And I I don't know about you, but I think we could be seeing a budget that is going to potentially push Britain into a full blown recession.
What's your thoughts on Rachel from accounts? And what do you think is gonna come out and be the sort of the main key points from the budget today?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I am extremely concerned about the next budget. Of course, what we have seen the Labour Party do since they took power last year has been just betraying us time and time again, implementing policies that time and time again have proven to actually harm us more than solve any issue. And so they don't seem to be stopping that rhetoric. They don't seem to have learnt any lessons over the course of the last twelve to fifteen months.
And so I do expect, unfortunately, that it will be quite a catastrophic budget. I think it will come once again for what they claim are corporations and companies and, you know, the the bigger people, you know, the rich. What what is the rich? Because they say the rich, and then they quote individuals who actually are on the average salary in the city of London. I mean, the average salary in the city in the city of London, they come for time and time again and they they claim you're rich, you know.
It started off as billionaires and now they're actually just coming for people who are on like, I mean, 5 figures, 6 figures. It's ludicrous. They are coming for our money. Okay? Time and time again, as you say, to give to those who are not British citizens, to give to foreign nations.
It's absolutely outrageous. And I think most British citizens, if you tell them, they will be outraged. Because, you know, if you have a child and you tell them to do eight hours of work and then you take half of their money and you give it to a child who sat down all day, that annoys the child who has worked hard. I mean, it's the basic principles of socialism is that it does not promote hard work. It actually demotes it.
You know? If you can earn the same on benefits as you could work in, you're not going to work. That's the very principle. And so, unfortunately, I think it will be a terrible budget. I think once again, they're going to come for ownership.
You know, we were told Kirsty Thomas said, you cannot be working class if you own property. That I don't I don't know when that came into play because I know plenty of working class people who would vote Labour, plenty of working class people, and they definitely owned a home. So that's insane. But that is the new principle, is they're coming for ownership because, of course, what we have been saying since 2020 onwards is you will own nothing and you will be happy. That is the idea of the great reset, which again is seen as a conspiracy theory.
It's laundered as a wild idea. But time and time again, the principles of the great reset are proven true. Governments are coming for not just freedom, but ownership. Ownership. If you own a property, we've got to stop you.
You know? If you're attempting to purchase a property, we will absolutely cripple you with stamp duty. And if you die, we will then cripple you with inheritance tax. If you own a farm, we're gonna try and we're gonna try and prevent you from owning a farm by coming for your assets too, which, of course, has been the huge outrage that Labour sparked since the last budget. So I don't have much hope.
Rachel from accounts is one of the worst chancellors we have ever seen, not just in competency, but I think in the way in which she is just fully clouded. There's no judgement there. There's no good judgement. And there's no listening to British citizens when they come out on mats with tractors and block half of London saying, you cannot cripple farmers because farmers are the backbone of the country. And they never reverse that.
They never give back to farmers. They never give back to those again who really do work the hardest in this country. That annoys people. That annoys families. And the real beauty of life is is being able to to work your way up a ladder of life.
Being able, you know, you get your first job, you manage to earn a promotion or start your own business, you get your first home, marriage, children, that they're all the most beautiful aspects of life. And they're becoming impossible for British citizens. The idea of having children or of even attempting to purchase a home would of course not make you working class anymore. So that's seen as utterly terrible. It's been made impossible time and time again.
They come for those who work hard. They come for young people preventing us, and then they bring out these ludicrous schemes of, well, maybe, you know, you could do a lifetime ISA in which we will give you a certain amount back and so on. What would be best is if you just stop taking our money, and then we can save and we can work to achieve a house instead of you bringing in these schemes where you can actually only save up to £4,000 a year. Like, that's never gonna achieve anything. And so wages have not improved much over the last few years and that and yet house prices continue to go up and up.
Inflation continues to go up and up. And so, of course, when you then continue taking, that is when there are issues. We are told again and again there is a black hole, this terrible millions of pound black hole, £20,000,000 black hole. The black hole is you giving to unnecessary causes and taking from us. Stop telling us about this black hole.
I mean, the black hole could be sold within five minutes if you cut unnecessary government spending, of which there is massive ludicrous amounts. If you cut unnecessary spending and you focus on priorities, which is putting more money in the pockets of British people, particularly those who are struggling, improving safety, improving the border, improving defence, all of these things that should be a priority of governments and not bailing out borders overseas, then maybe not only will you earn the respect of the British people, but maybe life will become a little more desirable here and millionaires en masse won't be moving and emigrating overseas.
Speaker 0: Well, you're right because 14,000 high net worth individuals, 14,000 millionaire plus have left within the last twelve months. Of course, the government have seen this, and now they're looking to introduce what they call a leveling up tax, almost, you know, a 25%. So if you're selling businesses, properties, whatever, stock shares, and leaving, they're gonna want to grab 25% of that. That's crazy. But that's what is the reality of it, Hayden.
And I have to say, Britain's not in good shape. I don't think this budget's gonna be any better. I think it's gonna potentially tip it over. We could be seeing some some really damaging economic fallout as a direct result. Now we're we're just coming up to the last part, Hayden.
First of all, I wanna I wanna say how much I've enjoyed the interview. I always I always do. You're a real bastard for a young guy. Remind us how old you are. What?
You're 20?
Speaker 1: I'm 19. Yeah. So 19.
Speaker 0: I would
Speaker 1: have been 18, but we're 19 now.
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, I've got to say, you know, you're a young guy. You're a young professional guy, with a lot of of deep understanding about what's going on, and I absolutely commend you. Would definitely encourage people to keep an eye on this young man, Hayden Appleby. He he's got a real vision and real passion to go with it.
He's he's a smart guy. But I wanna say, Hayden, as we always do with our amazing guests, we always give you the last and final words. So bearing in mind that we have hundreds and hundreds of many hundreds of thousands of followers from America, from Europe, from the from Britain, Australia, New Zealand, all over the world who tune in, what would you like to say to them? The floor is yours.
Speaker 1: What I would say is to keep talking would be my final message because, you know, everything we've kind of focused on and we've touched on today has in some underlying way touched on talking and discussion and unity over division, which is what we are facing so hugely. You know, we are I mean, the word divisive is thrown around like the word hello. I mean, it's just used constantly. But actually there is a deep division, not just left versus right, but in all viewpoints, there is a deep sense of disagreeing means you are the enemy. And we all fall for it too.
I mean, let's not just blame this on the left. I mean, everybody sees one another as the enemy, especially when you're in that heated moment. I've been there. I've thought, oh my goodness. What a terrible person.
They disagree with me on this issue. That must mean they're this, this, or that. They're probably not. And what you have to remember is that the majority of people do, in fact. They are good people.
They do have good ethics. They just somehow land on the other end of the coin to you. But they don't think what they're doing is bad. I mean, 99% of people don't go into something and have passion for a viewpoint, thinking it's a terrible viewpoint. I mean, that's counterintuitive.
People do things because they think they're what's right the majority of the time. And so my final message would be the people you are standing up to are the elites. The people you are standing up to are those who go to the parties on the island of Jeffrey Epstein. The people you are standing up to are those who are corrupt and who unfortunately have sold their souls because not everybody has good intentions. And those are the high elites within the establishment.
But 99% of people around you are not the ones you are fighting. They're not the ones who are evil. They're not your enemy. We need to unite. We need to unite in Britishness.
We need to unite in being in the West. We need to unite as a human race in standing up to and criticizing peacefully, I must assert those who are really coming for what is right, those who are coming for freedom time and time again. But we have to do it together, not divided, because divided we fall, but united we stand. And so stand, keep talking. Whether you have a million or just one disagreement with somebody, those disagreements, those discussions are healthy.
And so keep talking. More speech is what is needed, not less.
Speaker 0: More speech is what is needed, not less. Unity is strength. Hayden, thoroughly enjoyed today's interview. Thank you so much indeed for coming on with us.
Speaker 1: Brilliant. Thank you so much, Jim. It's been a pleasure.
Speaker 0: And for all the amazing people out there, stay tuned because there's more coming. And remember also, as the world gets darker, we get brighter. Until next time, this is Jim Ferguson, and we'll speak soon. Bye bye for now.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m noting De Becker’s claim that the 1975 Kissinger Report made population reduction official policy in 12 nations, pushing medicalized birth control, covert fertility-regulating injections, and paid sterilisation. He cites WHO tetanus/HCG vaccines, forced sterilisations in India and Peru, wellness injections, and a link between population policy and foreign resources. He parallels to today with injections affecting fertility, citing Fauci’s statements.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🔥 Gavin De Becker just linked the Kissinger Report, the WHO, Bill Gates, tetanus vaccines and the global birth-rate collapse — in FIVE minutes. What he claims is staggering: According to De Becker, the 1975 Kissinger Report made population reduction — not “control” — official U.S. foreign policy in 12 targeted nations. He says it pushed medicalised birth control, covert fertility-regulating injections, and even paid sterilisation programmes. He points out that: • The WHO spent the 1970s developing tetanus/HCG fertility-regulating vaccines • Forced sterilisation campaigns were carried out in India and Peru • “Wellness injections” were allegedly used to reduce pregnancy • And the Kissinger framework openly tied population reduction to access to foreign natural resources Then he draws a modern parallel: • The Kissinger Report mentions injections that temporarily reduce male fertility • Fauci admitted the COVID vaccine reduces male sperm count for 3 months • And people were told to take it every 3 months De Becker warns: The same ideology that drove 1970s population-reduction policy has now merged with global health power — Gates, WHO, and the new vaccine infrastructure. He calls it “dark as hell” — and insists almost nobody realises it’s written in official documents. This clip is going to explode.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth?
Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why?
Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports.
It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it.
What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid.
I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it.
Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story.
Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was?
Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the
Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and
Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs.
Speaker 1: And they had h c g
Speaker 0: in it. That's correct.
Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men.
Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections.
Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant.
Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG.
Speaker 1: There's Gates famously,
Speaker 0: of course,
Speaker 1: in the speech saying
Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines.
Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera.
Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report.
Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months.
Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth?
Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why?
Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports.
It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it.
What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid.
I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it.
Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story.
Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was?
Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the
Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and
Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were calling them wellness drugs.
Speaker 1: And they had h c g
Speaker 0: in it. That's correct.
Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men.
Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections.
Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant.
Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG.
Speaker 1: There's Gates famously,
Speaker 0: of course,
Speaker 1: in the speech saying
Speaker 0: Of course.
Speaker 1: We can do that with vaccines.
Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera.
Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report.
Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months.
Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that Archbishop Viganò accuses global elites of infiltrating Western governments to impose Agenda 2030, and warns of a criminal global plan. He says whistleblowers are silenced by censorship, intimidation, psychiatric abuse, or arrest, and that Rainer Füllmich is jailed for telling the truth. He insists those who committed crimes against humanity belong in prison, names Fauci, Gates, Schwab, Soros, von der Leyen, Bourla, and calls the system totalitarian. Raise your voice, free Füllmich.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 ARCHBISHOP VIGANÒ JUST DROPPED A NUCLEAR TRUTH BOMB When a senior Catholic Archbishop — a former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States — openly accuses global elites of infiltrating Western governments to impose Agenda 2030… the world should stop and listen. Viganò warns: “A dangerous subversive elite has infiltrated the highest levels of Western institutions to implement a criminal global plan.” He says those who expose this “global coup” are silenced through: • Censorship • Intimidation • Psychiatric abuse • Arrest And he names a political prisoner the mainstream refuses to talk about: Rainer Füllmich — imprisoned for the crime of telling the truth. Then Viganò goes further than almost any church figure in our lifetime: “It is not Füllmich who belongs in prison, but those who committed the greatest crime ever against humanity.” And he names them: Fauci Gates Schwab Soros von der Leyen Bourla …and their accomplices in public office. This is unprecedented. A senior Archbishop accusing the globalist power structure of crimes against humanity — and calling the emerging system what it is: A totalitarian regime spreading across Europe, Canada, Australia and every nation controlled by the UN, NATO, WHO and WEF. His call to the world is clear: “Raise your voice. Defend the persecuted. Free Rainer Füllmich.” History is accelerating. The Church is speaking. Whistleblowers are being jailed. And the globalists are losing their grip. The truth is breaking through. @CarloMVigano
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker asserts that “a dangerous subversive elite has managed to infiltrate the highest levels of Western institutions and governments to implement the criminal plan of the agenda 2030.” The claim continues that, “in many self proclaimed democratic states, devices denouncing this global coup are being silenced through censorship, intimidation, psychiatricisation and even arrest.” The speaker frames a broad consolidation of power as a totalitarian shift quietly taking hold “in Europe, Canada, Australia, and other vassal nation of the United Nations, NATO, World Health Organization, and World Economic Forum.”
A focal point of the message is the case of a private entity founder named in the speech: “all private entity founded by the same powers is lawyer Reiner Fulmisch, unjustly imprisoned and still awaiting for a fair trial.” The speaker states that Fulmisch’s “crime is having dared to speak the truth in a world of criminal lies.” The appeal follows to a moral appeal: “I call on Catholics and all people of goodwill to raise their voices in defense of those persecuted by the globalist regime.”
The speaker explicitly shifts responsibility away from Fulmisch, declaring, “It is not attorney Fulmish who should be imprisoned, but those who committed the greatest crime ever against humanity.” A list of individuals is named as principal actors behind the alleged crimes: “Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Claus Schwab, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, Albert Burla, and all their accomplices and emissaries, especially those in institutional positions.” The statement closes with a direct call: “Free Reinhard Fulmisch.” The language presents a stark framing of persecution, accusing a defined group of leading a globalist operation and portraying Fulmisch as a victim of this alleged regime. The speaker emphasizes the urgency of collective action and solidarity among believers and “people of goodwill” to resist the described oppression and to advocate for Fulmisch’s release.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A dangerous subversive elite has managed to infiltrate the highest levels of Western institutions and governments to implement the criminal plan of the agenda 2030. In many self proclaimed democratic states, devices denouncing this global coup are being silenced through censorship, intimidation, psychiatricisation and even arrest. Among the victims of the totalitarian regime quietly establishing itself in Europe, Canada, Australia, and other vassal nation of the United Nations, NATO, World Health Organization, and World Economic Forum, all private entity founded by the same powers is lawyer Reiner Fulmisch, unjustly imprisoned and still awaiting for a fair trial. His crime is having dared to speak the truth in a world of criminal lies. I call on Catholics and all people of goodwill to raise their voices in defense of those persecuted by the globalist regime.
It is not attorney Fulmish who should be imprisoned, but those who committed the greatest crime ever against humanity. Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Claus Schwab, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, Albert Burla, and all their accomplices and emissaries, especially those in institutional positions. Free Reinhard Fulmisch.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I reveal that HighWire uncovers every childhood vaccine lacking true placebo-controlled trials. Not one passed a true placebo test. The chart shows safety testing as a rigged illusion—experimental vaccines as controls, toxic adjuvants as placebos, and safety windows as short as 3 days. This is the journalism the public deserves. Watch, share, and see why voices like HighWire matter.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🔥 THE HIGHWIRE JUST BLEW THE LID OFF THE ENTIRE VACCINE SYSTEM What @HighWireTalk uncovered is staggering. A full breakdown of every childhood vaccine — and not a single one was licensed on a true placebo-controlled trial. Not one. This chart, years in the making, exposes the entire structure of “safety testing” as a rigged illusion — experimental vaccines tested against other experimental vaccines, toxic adjuvants used as “placebos,” and safety windows as short as 3 days. This is the kind of journalism the public deserves. This is why voices like The HighWire matter. Watch this interview. Share it. Eyes are finally opening. @HighWireTalk
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I read Shellenberger’s piece arguing governments push Digital ID as a fix for illegal immigration, ID fraud, and healthcare, but warn of digital totalitarianism. He cites China’s Social Credit and says the West follows a voluntary-to-mandatory path with rewards then punishments. The worst risk: a centralized ID creates a cybersecurity kill switch—breach could expose bank, medical records, identity, and an entire life. It’s a digital cage rapidly forming.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 ANOTHER “CONSPIRACY THEORY” JUST CAME TRUE — DIGITAL ID IS HERE Independent journalist Michael Shellenberger has uncovered exactly what the global elites are building — and it matches everything the WEF, UN, EU and UK have been quietly planning. Governments are now pitching Digital ID as a solution to: • “illegal immigration” • “ID fraud” • “streamlined healthcare” But Shellenberger warns the real danger is digital totalitarianism. China already uses Digital ID + Social Credit to control speech, movement, banking and behaviour. And the West is following the same script: • First it’s voluntary • Then it becomes mandatory • First there are rewards • Then come the punishments He also exposed the single biggest threat the public isn’t being told: A centralised ID system creates a massive cybersecurity kill switch. If it gets hacked, they can access: Your bank. Your medical records. Your identity. Your entire life. All in one breach. This isn’t “convenience.” It’s a digital cage — and they’re building it fast.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Independent journalist Michael Schellenberger has been digging into the digital ID issue. He just released a lengthy piece on Substack called Public. He joins us with his thoughts.
Michael says: The argument that digital IDs help thwart illegal immigration, ID fraud, streamline health care services sounds fantastic. But what’s the problem?
Michael responds: Hey, great to be with you. Yeah. Another conspiracy theory that has started coming true. We saw this announcement in September. The World Economic Forum had been pushing digital IDs, the United Nations, the European Union, Britain. Of course, the really terrifying example is China, which uses digital IDs and a social credit score to control speech and to control what people think and say online. It could come in a lot of different ways.
They’ll start voluntary, then they’ll make it mandatory. They’ll have rewards, and then they’ll have punishments. It’s quite terrifying. And when you listen to what the advocates for digital IDs say, it’s terrifying. And, you know, Laura, one thing I learned from this last round of investigations is that this is a huge cybersecurity threat. The idea that, I mean, imagine if you get hacked in one of the many websites that you log into. Imagine everything suddenly being hacked because it’s all centralized in a single place. That cybersecurity threat alone ought to be enough to kill the digital ID. But, again, this is potentially digital totalitarianism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Independent journalist Michael Schellenberger has been digging into the digital ID issue. He just released a lengthy piece on this on a substat called public. He joins us now with his thoughts. Michael, look. The argument is, it's like so helps help thwart illegal immigration, ID fraud, streamline health care services.
Sounds fantastic. What the heck's the problem?
Speaker 1: Right. Hey. Great to be with you, Laura. Yeah. I mean, another conspiracy theory that has started coming true.
I mean, we saw this announcement in September. It took everybody by surprise. The World Economic Forum had been pushing digital IDs, the United Nations, the European Union, Britain. Of course, the the really terrifying example is China, which uses digital IDs and a social credit score to control speech and to control what people think and say online. I mean, it could come in a lot of different ways.
They'll start voluntary, then they'll make it mandatory. They'll have rewards, and then they'll have punishments. It's quite terrifying. And when you just listen to what the advocates for digital IDs say, it's terrifying. And, you know, Laura, one thing I learned from this last round of investigations is that this is a huge cybersecurity threat.
The idea that I mean, imagine if you get hacked in one of the many websites that you log into. Imagine everything suddenly being hacked because it's all centralized in a single place. That cyber security threat alone ought to be enough to kill the digital ID. But, again, this is potentially digital totalitarianism.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I watched a trailer alleging UN Agenda 2030 uses Canada as a proving ground for a global technocracy. It claims the plan is to replace money with digital credits, control energy, seize farmland for “pharma food,” re-engineer economies via net zero, and justify it through a climate crisis. It warns data manipulation and fear manufacture consent, with digital IDs ending humanity and Mark Carney steering governance. They call it sustainability, but see submission.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 CANADA: THE TEST SITE FOR A GLOBAL CONTROL GRID The three-minute trailer that everyone needs to see. The truth about UN Agenda 2030 is no longer hidden — and Canada is the proving ground. This isn’t theory. It’s the blueprint for global technocracy in motion. “The lust to control other human beings is as old as time.” From the collapse of liberal democracy to the rise of centralized rule by unelected officials, the agenda is simple: Control every resource. Control every citizen. Control every choice. Their plan: Replace money with programmable digital credits Transform energy and dictate how you use it Seize farmland and replace real food with “pharma food” Re-engineer economies through “net zero” and “sustainability” Their justification: the “climate crisis.” But the film exposes how data manipulation and fear are being used to manufacture consent for a global control system. Experts warn: “Once the digital ID is in place — it’s game over for humanity.” And at the center of it all? Mark Carney — a man who preaches global governance, controls financial levers, and waits for his majority government to finish the job. They call it sustainability. But it’s really submission — economic, agricultural, digital, and human. Canada is the model. The question is: will the rest of the world wake up before the model goes global?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Several speakers present a cohesive, alarmist view of a global move toward centralized, technocratic governance:
- A long-standing desire to control others is fueling a push toward globalization and centralization of power in unelected officials at supranational bodies. They claim the aim is to have all the world’s resources “in their pocket.”
- The larger project is described as an attempt to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with a global technocracy. A “coup” is alleged, with the argument that rules could replace currency, creating a system of control without money.
- The situation is likened to an inverted prison: people may seem free to roam, but “everything you want to access is behind lock and key.” The potential for social control is described as gigantic and potentially irreversible.
- The plan reportedly includes commandeering land, reducing farming, radically changing the food we eat, transforming the electricity supply, and dictating how it is used, while replacing currency with a system of credits. All three strategies are said to be premised on a climate-crisis narrative centered on carbon dioxide.
- One speaker disputes the climate-crisis premise, stating they do not think there is a climate crisis and that the government pushes a catastrophic story; another adds that no single science paper proves conclusively that humans control all or most of the climate.
- Europe is criticized for a “mad dash towards net zero,” described as economic suicide that deliberately impoverishes ordinary people and de-industrializes Europe, raising questions about what is being saved if it’s being paved over.
- A global war on agriculture is claimed, with many farms selling up and concerns about looming food shortages. There is a suggestion that shifting people from “real food” to “pharma food” would enable control through publicly traded stocks.
- The speakers call the movement “the biggest public relations scam in the history of the world” and, more broadly, a blueprint and action plan. They warn that life on Earth will be radically changed and that everything will be monitored, with environmental consequences of every human action.
- A chilling point is made that once a digital ID is in place, “it's game over for humanity,” and that the general population cannot fathom the psychopathy of the vision they describe.
Overall, the discussion centers on a perceived coordinated effort to centralize power globally, erode traditional democracy, redefine currency, reshape agriculture and energy systems, and surveil all human activity under a climate-justified technocracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The lust to control other human beings is a story as old as time. There's a very strong drift in the direction of globalization, of the ultimate centralization of control in the hands of unelected officials at supernational organizations.
Speaker 1: They want all of the resources of the world in their pocket.
Speaker 2: The bigger picture is that an attempt is underway now to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy.
Speaker 3: This is a coup. They're saying we can control with rules. We don't need currency anymore.
Speaker 4: It's like an inverted prison. You are supposedly free to roam about, but everything you want to access is behind lock and key.
Speaker 2: The potential for social control is gigantic and potentially irreversible.
Speaker 5: They plan to commandeer land, reduce farming, and radically change the food we eat. Transform the supply of electricity, and then dictate how we use it. And replace currency with a system of credits. All three strategies are built on the premise of a climate crisis caused by carbon dioxide.
Speaker 1: I do not think there's a climate crisis, and I base that on all the evidence and the climate data sets that we build to answer questions just like that. The government is very clear that they want a catastrophic story.
Speaker 4: There is no single science paper that proves conclusively that humans control all or most of the global climate.
Speaker 6: Europe's mad dash towards net zero is effectively economic suicide. Politicians are purposely impoverishing ordinary people, purposely de industrializing Europe. There's just
Speaker 4: tremendous amount of damage in the name of saving the planet. It does make you ask what is it we're actually saving if we're paving it over.
Speaker 6: I think what we're dealing with here is actually a global war on agriculture.
Speaker 5: When you look at how many farms are selling up, we're walking into food shortages.
Speaker 3: If I can switch everybody from real food to pharma food, then 100% of the agriculture industry can go through my publicly traded stocks, and I have complete control.
Speaker 7: This is the biggest public relations scam in the history of the world. But it's far more than that. It's a blueprint. It is the action plan.
Speaker 1: All life on Earth is going to be radically changed.
Speaker 5: Everything will be monitored. The environmental consequences of every human action.
Speaker 3: The general population cannot fathom the psychopathy of the vision that they're facing.
Speaker 4: Once the digital ID is in place, it's game over for humanity.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that at WEF 2025, Spanish PM Sánchez demands ending online anonymity, linking every social account to an EU Digital ID Wallet. He says no one should walk streets with a mask, so online identities must be revealed. Translation: the EU will abolish digital privacy, attaching name, ID, and biometrics to online activity. It’s total traceability—a digital surveillance grid monitoring posts, purchases, and opinions. Freedom Train International warned this could form a 2030 control grid.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 WEF 2025 BOMBSHELL 🚨 Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez DEMANDS the END of online anonymity — calling for every social media account to be linked to an EU Digital ID Wallet. At the World Economic Forum, Sánchez declared: “No one can walk the streets with a mask — so why allow people to roam online without revealing their identity?” Translation: The EU is preparing to abolish digital privacy — forcing every citizen to attach their name, ID, and biometric data to their online activity. This isn’t about “accountability.” It’s about total traceability. A digital surveillance grid where every post, purchase, and opinion is monitored. First they came for free speech. Now they’re coming for anonymity itself. At Freedom Train International, we warned this was coming: The merger of Digital ID, AI censorship, and state surveillance will form the backbone of the Digital Control Grid of 2030. Freedom dies when privacy ends. And the battle for both has just begun.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that anonymity on social media stands in contrast to everyday norms in their countries, where masks on streets, unlicensed cars, IDs for packages, and names when purchasing hunting weapons are standard requirements. They point out that social networks currently allow people to roam freely without linking profiles to real identities, which they say enables misinformation, hate speech, and cyber harassment by facilitating bot activity and reducing accountability for actions.
They contend that such an anomaly cannot continue. In a democracy, they claim, citizens have the right to privacy, but not the right to anonymity or impunity, because anonymity and impunity would undermine social coexistence. Based on this premise, they advocate for pushing forward the principle of pseudonymity as the functioning element of social media, and for forcing all platforms to link every user account to a European digital identity wallet.
With this system, citizens would still be able to use nicknames if they choose, but in the case of a crime, public authorities would be able to connect those nicknames to real people and hold them responsible. The underlying assertion is that accountability is not an obstacle to freedom of speech, but rather an essential complement to it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To anonymity on social media. In our countries, no one can walk the streets with a mask on their face or drive a car without a license plate. No one can send packages without showing an ID or buy a hunting weapon without giving their name. And yet, we are allowing people to roam freely on social networks without linking their profiles to a real identity. This paving the way for misinformation, hate speech, and cyber harassment because it is facilitating the use of bots and it is allowing people to act without being held accountable for their actions.
Such an anomaly cannot continue. In a democracy, citizens have the right to privacy, not the not to anonymity or impunity. Because with those two, social coexistence would be impossible. That is why I believe we must push forward the principle of pseudonymity as the functioning element of social media and force all these platforms to link every user account to an European digital identity wallet. This way, citizens could use nicknames if they want, but in the case of a crime, public authorities would be able to connect those nicknames to real people and hold them responsible.
Because accountability is not an obstacle to freedom of speech, it is an essential complement to it.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I quote Tulsi Gabbard: Obama ordered the overthrow of the U.S. government after the 2016 election, on Hillary Clinton’s behalf. When Americans chose Trump, the Obama machine fabricated a Russia interference narrative to delegitimize the President. From Obama down—Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Rice, Lynch, Yates, Clinton, Schiff, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Mueller— they built a shadow coup. Treason, not politics; the Russia tale was sedition to reverse the election and deny 63 million voters.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 TULSI GABBARD: “OBAMA ORDERED THE OVERTHROW OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT” 🚨 🔥 Only 38 seconds — and it changes everything. Former DNI Tulsi Gabbard just said it out loud: “Barack Hussein Obama ordered the overthrow of the United States government — on behalf of Hillary Clinton — after the 2016 election.” When Americans voted for Trump, the Obama machine refused to accept it. So they manufactured a false intelligence narrative, alleging Russian interference to delegitimize the President the people chose. From Obama down — Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Rice, Lynch, Yates, Monaco, Clinton, Schiff, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Mueller, Rosenstein, Weissmann, Jarrett, Rhodes — they built a shadow coup against a sitting U.S. President. This wasn’t politics. This was treason. The so-called “Russian collusion” story was not a mistake — it was a calculated act of sedition to reverse an election and nullify the will of 63 million Americans. They called it “protecting democracy.” But they were overthrowing it. Watergate looks like a parking ticket compared to this. And history will remember it for what it was — a coup against the Republic itself.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses actions taken in recent weeks related to transparency of intelligence operations and political manipulation surrounding the 2016 U.S. election. They claim that documents have been declassified and released which reveal that, after Election Day 2016, high-level figures in the Obama administration and leaders within the intelligence community knowingly created and disseminated a false intelligence document. This document, according to the speaker, asserted that Russia intended to assist Donald Trump in winning the presidency with the aim of undermining his administration and overriding the will of the American people who voted for Trump to be the nation’s commander in chief rather than Hillary Clinton.
The core claim presented is that this manufactured intelligence was produced and circulated despite the outcome of the election having already been decided by the voters, and despite the public’s expressed preference for Trump to assume the presidency. The speaker emphasizes that the deception occurred at the highest levels of government and intelligence, implying an intentional effort to influence perceptions about the 2016 election and the legitimacy of Trump’s win by attributing foreign support to him that allegedly aimed to undermine his presidency from the start.
Key elements highlighted include:
- The timing: after the 2016 election was completed, and after the American people expressed their choice for the presidency.
- The actors: President Obama and leaders within the intelligence community.
- The nature of the claim: the creation of a “manufactured” or false intelligence document.
- The alleged content: Russia’s supposed goal to help Trump win with the objective of undermining his presidency and overruling the expressed will of the voters.
- The consequence implied: a deliberate effort to mislead about foreign influence in the election and to challenge the legitimacy or outcome of the election by associating Trump with foreign assistance intended to subvert democratic choice.
Overall, the speaker asserts that the released documents expose a deliberate fabrication by top government figures designed to cast doubt on the 2016 election outcome and to imply foreign interference aligned with undermining Trump’s presidency. The emphasis is on the authenticity and impact of declassified materials that reveal this alleged manipulation. No evaluation of the truth of these claims is provided within the summary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We look at where we are now over the last several weeks. We've declassified and released documents that exposed how president Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the twenty sixteen election was done, after the American people said, no, we want Donald Trump to go and be our commander in chief, not Hillary Clinton. And this manufactured document alleged that Russia aspired to help president Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I witnessed Dr. Joe Ladapo warn at the CHD Moment of Truth Conference that global forces seek to enslave humanity, naming media voices from The Washington Post and The Atlantic as part of a silent, controlling alliance. Yet he offered hope: our power far outstrips the threat if we tap into it. This isn’t a party or nation battle; it’s a war for the soul of humanity, a fight for freedom. The awakening has begun.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 FLORIDA SURGEON GENERAL: “GLOBAL FORCES ARE WORKING TOWARD THE ENSLAVEMENT OF HUMANITY.” At the CHD Moment of Truth Conference in Austin, Texas, Dr. Joe Ladapo delivered one of the most chilling — and courageous — warnings yet: “The biggest challenge that humanity is facing is really a fight for and a struggle for freedom… Reporters from The Washington Post and The Atlantic represent forces who are working toward the enslavement of humanity.” Ladapo didn’t flinch. He named the enemy — a global alliance of media, institutions, and unelected powers seeking to silence dissent and control thought itself. But he also delivered hope: “The power that each of us has far outspans that… it’s just a matter of tapping into it.” This is no longer a battle between parties or nations. It’s a war for the soul of humanity — between those who would enslave, and those who will stand free. Freedom is under siege. But the awakening has begun. @FLSurgeonGen
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker identifies the largest challenge confronting humanity as a fight for freedom and a struggle for what people are entitled to. They frame this struggle as being against certain forces that include reporters from prominent outlets such as the Washington Post and The Atlantic. While the speaker states they have nothing against these reporters personally, they insist that these reporters represent forces “working toward the enslavement of humanity.” The speaker emphasizes that these opposing forces wield tremendous power.
In contrast, the speaker asserts that the power possessed by each individual is far greater than the power of those opposing forces. This personal power, the speaker argues, is simply a matter of tapping into it. The underlying message is that collective freedom depends on individuals recognizing and accessing their own potential power to counteract the forces perceived as threatening human freedom.
The speaker’s framing suggests a dichotomy between large, powerful institutions or movements that would enslave humanity and the greater, latent power within every person to choose freedom. The essential claim is that freedom is an entitlement under threat, and the key to overcoming the formidable powers arrayed against it lies in individuals realizing and mobilizing their own capabilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The biggest challenge that humanity is facing is really a a fight for and a struggle for freedom, like what we are entitled for. And all of these forces, including frankly, you know, a lot of the reporters from I saw reporters from Washington Post and The Atlantic that represent these forces that, you know, and I got I have nothing against them. But, you know, just to be clear, they represent forces who are working toward the enslavement of humanity. And it's it's and and they have they have a tremendous power, but we, the power that each and each of us has far out spans that, far out spans that. It's just a matter of being able to tap into it.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I read this as a takeover forecast: when everything is tokenized, central banks are outsourced to BlackRock’s rails, dollars become private ledger tokens, and payments follow their rules. This isn’t efficiency—it’s enclosure. Tokenization = programmable money plus programmable permission; flip a flag, access throttles, fees at every gate, total visibility, zero recourse. Open, interoperable public rails; cash protections; ban private control; opt-out rights. Who runs your money—you, your nation, or BlackRock?
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
💥 LARRY FINK ISN’T FORECASTING—HE’S ANNOUNCING A TAKEOVER “When every currency and asset is tokenized,” translate it: • Central banks → outsourced to BlackRock’s rails • Dollars → just tokens in a private ledger • Payments → your wallet, their rules This isn’t “efficiency.” It’s enclosure. Tokenization = programmable money + programmable permission. Flip a flag and your access throttles. Fees at every gate. Total visibility. Zero recourse. We don’t need a corporate Federal Reserve 2.0. The counter-move: • Open, interoperable public rails • Cash protections in law • Ban private control over state money • Opt-out rights from “mandatory” digital wallets Fink isn’t warning you. He’s briefing you. The question is: who runs your money—you, your nation, or BlackRock?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says the biggest question for central banks is the role of tokenization and digitization, including how quickly they should digitize their own currency and what that means for the role of the dollar, bank payments, and payment companies like Mastercard and Visa. They note that while much discussion centers on AI, not enough attention is paid to how quickly every financial asset will be tokenized and the opportunity to use a digital wallet to move assets such as ETFs. They believe this will happen worldwide very rapidly and that most countries are ill prepared for it, with an underappreciation of how technology is changing this, not unlike how technology is changing AI. It will change the technology around the plumbing of finance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would say the biggest question from central banks is what is the role of tokenization and digitization? How quickly should they think about digitizing their own currency? What does that mean for the role of the dollar? If every currency digitizes and we have, you know, what does that mean for bank payments? What does that mean for the for the payment companies like Mastercard and Visa?
All these are being questioned right now. I will make you know, we I think we spend so much time talking about a AI. We're not spending enough time talking about what how quickly we're gonna tokenize every financial asset and the opportunity we're gonna have to have a digital wallet and moving, you know, ETFs and other things through a digital wallet. And I think that's gonna happen worldwide very rapidly. And I think most countries are ill prepared for that and I under appreciate how technology is changing that, not not unlike how technology is changing AI and other things.
It will be changing the technology around the plumbing of finance.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that Gabbard reveals what the deep state hid: Obama knew Hillary Clinton was mentally unfit and said nothing. The original intelligence described Clinton’s intensified psycho-emotional problems, anger, and heavy tranquilizers. Obama allegedly withheld a national-security threat and engineered a conspiracy to overthrow the U.S. government, later blamed on Trump. A psychopath in the White House, sedated and shielded by the establishment, could have sparked blackmail, espionage, and World War III. The truth is darker and coming out.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 TULSI GABBARD DROPS A POLITICAL NUCLEAR BOMB Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard just confirmed what the deep state never wanted you to know. Russia wasn’t the only one sitting on explosive secrets — Barack Obama knew Hillary Clinton was mentally unfit for office and said nothing. The original intelligence report described Clinton’s “intensified psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, and heavy tranquilizers.” Yet Obama withheld a national-security threat from the American people and engineered a conspiracy to overthrow the U.S. government — the very act they later tried to pin on Trump. A psychopath in the White House, sedated and shielded by the establishment. What could that have led to? Blackmail. Espionage. World War III. The truth is darker than anyone imagined — and it’s finally coming out.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript states that Russia claimed to have very, very damaging information—high level DNC emails relating specifically to Hillary Clinton's physical and mental health and DNC leaders questioning whether, if elected, she would be capable of carrying out the duties of the presidency. Russia had this information. If they wanted to swing the election for Donald Trump, they would have released it in September or October 2016 at a pivotal time to swing momentum in Donald Trump’s direction and damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign. They did not do that deliberately. They understood that Hillary Clinton would likely be the inevitable president of The United States. They didn’t think Trump could win like a lot of other people. And so they were withholding this damaging information about Hillary Clinton and planning to release it in the days or weeks leading up to her inaugurate expected inauguration in order to once again sow chaos within The United
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the most significant pieces of evidence that was revealed in that report we released yesterday is the fact that Russia claimed to have very, very damaging information, high level DNC emails relating specifically to Hillary Clinton's physical and mental health and and DNC leaders questioning whether or not if elected, she would even be capable of carrying out the duties of the presidency. Russia had this. If they wanted to swing the election for Donald Trump, they would have released it in September, October 2016 at a pivotal time to swing momentum into Donald Trump's direction and damage Hillary Clinton's campaign. They did not do that deliberately. They're they they understood that Hillary Clinton would likely be the inevitable president of The United States.
They didn't think Trump could win like a lot of other people. And so they were withholding this damaging information about Hillary Clinton and planning to release it in the days or weeks leading up to her to her inaugurate expected inauguration in order to once again sow chaos within The United
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I see doctors reopening the parasite theory of cancer, with some researchers arguing tumor cells may mimic or host intracellular parasites that feed off the body while evading immunity. Others call it pseudoscience, yet the debate shows patients and clinicians demanding open inquiry and answers, not censorship. Whatever the truth, the microscope may finally reveal what decades of suppression kept hidden.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 THE PARASITE THEORY OF CANCER RETURNS TO THE DEBATE Doctors and researchers across the world are reopening one of the most controversial questions in medicine: could cancer behave more like a parasitic invasion than a genetic accident? A growing number of scientists are pointing to studies suggesting strange, life-like structures inside tumors that resemble parasitic forms — and raising uncomfortable questions long dismissed by mainstream oncology. They argue that what we call “tumor cells” may in fact mimic, or even host, intracellular parasites — organisms that hijack the body’s resources, feeding off its life force while evading immune detection. Others say this is pseudoscience. But the debate itself marks a shift: patients and doctors are demanding open inquiry, not censorship. Whatever the truth, one thing is clear — people want answers, not silence. The microscope may yet reveal what decades of suppression kept hidden.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that parasites and cancer have been kept separate topics despite evidence linking them, noting that the NIH has many studies on ivermectin and cancer while doctors worldwide show videos, and referencing a German 1990s project suggesting cancer is caused by intracellular parasites. He cites an example of an adenocarcinoma of the bowel or breast cancer under the light microscope appearing essentially indistinguishable from parasite egg sacs, and relays Brian Artis’s account of a forty-year Egyptian parasitologist who said, “In forty years in parasitology, not one oncologist has told me has made that association, but we talk about it all the time in parasitology circles.” He concludes that “they know that cancer is parasites” but that researchers do not speak about it to avoid losing funding.
Speaker 1 shifts to the microbiome and physiology, noting that 40–60 percent of blood volume passes through the mesenteric gut, delivering blood through arteries with melanopsin receptors. He explains that prokaryotes (bacteria) release 5,000 times more light than eukaryotic cells. Physicist Fritz Pott reportedly showed that every cell emits a specific frequency of light called extreme low frequency UV, though the spectrum remains unknown. He conceptualizes the microbiome as a light projector and the enterocyte surface as the screen, with the information buried in the emitted light driving microbiome function. He contends that light is central to quantum biology in the gut and that current biology and gut health research do not fully understand this.
Speaker 1 praises Jeff Leach’s work, referencing a paper on HASDA equatorial populations fed highly processed foods; the microbiome did not change with diet, and he views this as pivotal, arguing that exposure to nature and sun alters the microbiome. He explains that migration changes the microbiome due to changes in latitude and diurnal light variation, which suggests that light, water, and magnetism sculpt the gut microbiome in powerful, perhaps paradigm-shifting ways. He mentions a blog post (CPC number 42) and plans to share counterintuitive connections between the gut and brain in Europe (Poland and Germany) after releasing related material on Patreon.
Speaker 1 urges microbiome researchers to analyze the spectrum of light emitted by the microbiome, proposing photo multiplier techniques to understand species variation tied to environmental light. He notes UV light is toxic to most prokaryotes, while blue, green, and red light are preferred by many bacteria; mitochondria, derived from a bacterium 650 million years ago, tolerate UV light due to cytochrome components and fluorophore proteins. He describes NAD/NADH as a light-absorbing electron acceptor linked to tryptophan, absorbing 340 nm light, and asserts that carbohydrate electrons enter mitochondria via cytochrome one, with environmental light signals influencing both the skin and gut, and ultimately affecting the brain, blood-brain barrier, and even the cervical spinal cord barrier. He concludes that the gut is a counterintuitive quantum biologic tissue and that many diseases originate outside the gut, with skin and eye signals altering gut processes and biophysical properties of CSF and barriers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because another dirty little secret that's come out in all this is that we've been ignoring the issue of parasites and cancer. The NIH is not because they've got a million studies on ivermectin and cancer. But doctors all over the world now are showing videos. And there was a German research project years ago in the 90s, I think, showing cancer was parasites, intracellular parasites. Right.
If you look at a cancer metastasis like or an adenocarcinoma of the bowel, for example, or breast cancer under the light microscope, it's almost it's essentially indistinguishable from these parasite egg sacs. Now Brian Artis, who's a chiropractor but is very interested and very good researcher on this stuff, he said he has a friend who's a forty year Egyptian parasitologist. And he asked him and he pointed this out to him. He said, Hey, you know, I've been looking at this cancer versus the parasite egg sacs, and they look identical under the microscope. And this guy got real wide eyed and said, In forty years in parasitology, not one oncologist has told me has made that association, but we talk about it all the time in parasitology circles.
I translate as saying they know that cancer is parasites. They're not speaking because they don't want to lose their funding.
Speaker 1: You guys know, being microbiome guys, that when we eat, 40 to 60 of our blood volume goes through the mesenteric plexus of our gut. And that means that massive amounts of blood are delivered through those arteries. Those arteries also have melanopsin receptors in it. And here's the crazier part. The microbiome is made out of prokaryotes, you know that all bacteria are prokaryotes.
Here's what you may not know. Prokaryotes are known to release 5,000 times more light than eukaryotic cells. Now remember, we're made out of eukaryotic cells. Okay? Bacteria release a ton more light.
It turns out there's a physicist named Fritz Pott who discovered about twenty to twenty five years ago that every single cell on the planet, whether it's animal or plant, releases a very interesting frequency of light and it's called extreme low frequency UV light. To this day, nobody knows what the spectrum of that light is but we know every single cell that's ever been tested releases this light. So I started to realize immediately that the microbiome, its main function is a light meteorite and the way I like to think about it is I look at the microbiome as a projector in a movie theater and the enterocyte or the surface of the gut as the screen. It turns out that the black swan mitochondria is most interested not in the projector or the screen. All the information that's buried in the light is actually what we need to know about how the microbiome is working.
It turns out the light that's emitted from the different species of bacteria are absolutely critical in the quantum biology of the human gut. And this is the reason why people in biology and gut health really don't truly understand it. You know better than most that we have found, you know, we think certain floors are simplified when we eat certain diets. You know, one of my heroes in this because I I've I've been a salmon swimming upstream in the microbiome world, and you know that. Mhmm.
Because I've been saying that light scopes the microbiome for a really long time and I didn't have a lot of good data to back me up on this. But Jeff Leach, who's a microbiome researcher that, you know, published in Science Magazine last year, he found that when he gave the HASDA who are equatorial people, basically fed them shit on a shingle, gave them antibiotics, American candy bars, Coca Cola, Fanta, you name it. He gave them anything when he checked their microbiome nothing changed.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: And when he published this paper, I had the biggest smile on my face because I knew that was right and you know last year I went to Vermont and Jeff also talked at Vermont and when he presented this paper from the stage, I told everybody there that this paper was the single most important paper that's come out in microbiome research in my opinion. Why? Because it definitively showed that when you put people in nature under the power of sun, their microbiome doesn't change with diet and this paradigm that you guys know exist in your world must change. It's not changed yet but it's coming and there's so many papers now that are beginning to show that just migration alone changes, you know, the microbiome. Well, why would migration change it?
Because the latitude changes. That means the diurnal variation of the light change. What people don't realize is that the equatorial region, there is no diurnal change in light. It's the same twelve hours a day from the sun up, sun down. As we move away from the Equator, what happens?
The day shortens, you know, and it lengthens in the summer but the key is the diurnal variation also changes. This has to be correlated with species chains in the gut and once you begin to realize that these things are linked, that's how I think we're gonna get people to understand how the gut microbiome really is sculpted utilizing light water and magnetism in ways that would probably blow their mind. And you know, I told you before we came on the podcast that today I released the blog called CPC number 42. Mhmm. And I was supposed to go to Vermont this year to talk about this topic.
Mhmm. And I'm instead I'm going to Europe to go to Poland and to Germany. So I decided four months early that I would release what I was going to say on Vermont about the counterintuitive connection between the gut and the brain today on Patreon. So some of the things that I just described to you guys, all the little nasty details about actually how light water and magnetism do this sculpting is actually contained in that block. And when you see this, I think you guys as microbiome guys are gonna look at this and go, oh my goodness.
We need to do a lot of work and I'll be honest with you, one of the things I'd like to see change, I'd like to see people who do microbiome research, take the microbiome out, put it in a photo multiplier and then do the spectrum analysis on the light that's emitted because guess what? Then I think you're gonna understand why we have all the species that we do and why they vary because they're varying based on light that's outside and what most people don't understand is UV light is toxic to most prokaryotes. It turns out that blue, green and red light is what most bacteria really like And it turns out the bacteria that we stole called the mitochondria Mhmm. 650,000,000 ago, actually is built to like UV light. That's what makes it different than every other bacteria on the planet.
It's the only bacteria that I know of that can tolerate UV light to a great degree and the reason for that is cytochrome one, which is goes back to the story that we started with
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Is made out of a fluorophore protein. What does that mean? It's a protein that works with UV light. And most of you have heard of it, it's called NAD positive or NADH. It's an electron acceptor that passes it to the second cytochrome which is made out of a flavin dihydrogenase.
That's a blue light detector and it turns out that NAD is made out of niacin which is a vitamin b3. Where does niacin come from? Tryptophan. What did we just say before about tryptophan? It's an aromatic amino acid that absorbs between two hundred and four hundred nanometer light.
So we now know that niacin in NAD absorbs 340 nanometer light. Why is that important for your work and the microbiome researchers work? All carbohydrate electrons enter the mitochondria through cytochrome one. So highly powered electrons made from the sun via photosynthesis, remember, through Einstein's equation called the photoelectric effect, photons only interact with electrons. That excites them.
Well, what cytochrome one is really doing is taking those excited electrons and capturing the light in there as it falls back to the ground state, and that energy is being utilized in the cell. It turns out the signal from the environment is not only coming from the eye, it's coming from the skin, but for you guys, it's also coming from the gut, meaning that light show between the projector and the enterocyte is where the action is. Because these things need to be yoked together. And when you begin to see the pieces and parts moving together, you begin to realize that what we're really doing in microbiome research right now is we're not even in the first inning. We're in we're in, like, there's the first batters up and the count is three and two.
And I know you guys are Aussies much, but it'd be like the beginning of a cricket game. Yeah. And and the thing is I wanna make sure that the audience understands that where we are now. I think people really think definitively that we know a lot more than we do. I'm gonna tell you, I believe with the gut and the microbiome, we know very little.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: And the reason why I personally believe the microbiome and the gut is the most counterintuitive quantum biologic tissue that's in the human body. And if you've read anything that I've written, that's a mouthful considering what I've said about the brain and the eye already. I find the gut extremely interesting because most some of the most interesting quantum biologic processes begin there. And you know, there's many diseases, you know, especially the functional medicine guys. They're always out there telling people that autoimmunity and obesity and everything begins in the gut.
Turns out that's not really true. It actually begins on the skin and the eye and that's what changes things in the gut but the gut does sculpt the brain in ways that we don't yet realize and that uses red blood cells. It uses changes, biophysical changes in the blood in both the portal and the mesenteric system that affect the hydrogen bonding networks of CSF, actually affects the blood brain barrier, affects the cervical spinal cord barrier. That's why many many diseases that we now don't have an answer for in medicine, when you see it through this perspective, you begin to realize why some of the problems with them exist.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I claim BlackRock CEO Larry Fink meets potential world leaders before they win, shaping them to fit a globalist agenda before the public ever has a say. Unelected billionaires hand-pick the future, steering policy and markets to serve their empire. Democracy is being replaced by corporate puppetry, and the people never voted for this. It’s time to name the power behind the curtain and end the reign of the unelected elite.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
💣 THE GLOBALIST KINGMAKER BlackRock CEO and WEF co-chair Larry Fink openly admits he likes to spend time with “potential world leaders before they win.” Translation: he meets them before elections are even decided — ensuring they’re fully aligned with the globalist agenda before the public ever gets a say. From Keir Starmer to presidents and prime ministers worldwide, unelected billionaires like Fink are hand-picking the future — shaping policy, markets, and nations to serve their empire of control. Democracy is being replaced by corporate puppetry. The people never voted for this. It’s time to name the power behind the curtain — and end the reign of the unelected elite.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Given this access that you have, which I think is almost unique. I do believe because of the business model of who and what we are, our reach, we're heavily involved in most countries' retirement, whether it's in Mexico. We're the largest third non Mexican, not a foray retirement manager. We're the largest retirement manager, non Japanese, in Japan. You know, we're the largest retirement manager in The UK, including the domestics.
And so having that position, it's all about long term issues, but it's things that you can't replicate because it's based on years of relationships trust, and you know, whether it is And then I do go out of my way when there's somebody who's new in their role, a new prime minister. Will spend time, generally what I try to do is spend time before they win and meet the candidate. So whether it's in Mexico, spending time with Claudia before she won, or spending time with Kirstyme. Right. You know, it's just spending time with them and just saying, you know, you have access to whatever information you need.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Given this access that you have, which I think is is almost unique. I do believe because of the business model of who and what we are, our our reach, we're heavily involved in most countries' retirement, whether it's in Mexico. We're the largest third non Mexican, not a foray retirement manager. We're the largest retirement manager, non Japanese, in Japan. You know, we're the largest retirement manager in The UK, including the domestics.
And so having that position, it's all about long term issues, but it's things that you can't replicate because it's based on years of relationships trust, and you know, whether it is And then I do go out of my way when there's somebody who's new in their role, a new prime minister. Will spend time, generally what I try to do is spend time before they win and meet the candidate. So whether it's in Mexico, spending time with Claudia before she won, or spending time with Kirstyme. Right. You know, it's just spending time with them and just saying, you know, you have access to whatever information you need.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I discussed Dr. Joseph Sansone's perspective on mRNA as a bioweapon and the implications of mandates, which he argues violate Florida law. He emphasizes the negative efficacy of mRNA and its roots in DARPA, framing mandates as a form of psychological manipulation. Sansone has filed lawsuits against state officials, citing serious risks associated with mRNA. He warns of a future where criminal intent could emerge and describes the current situation as a battle against oppressive forces. His call to action encourages resistance and unity in the fight for truth.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🧵BIWEAPON EXPOSED: DR. JOSEPH SANSONE ON mRNA GENOCIDE & PSYOP MANDATES Psychotherapist vs. psychopathic authoritarians—Sansone's lawsuits call mRNA "weapons of mass destruction" (FL law violation). From "Ban the Jab" resolutions to appellate fights: "Truth frees, fear traps." THREAD @PhdSansone
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Joseph Sansom, Florida psychotherapist specializing in clinical hypnosis, describes his push to halt 'MRI injections' by filing Florida lawsuits seeking injunction against the governor and attorney general, arguing they 'are in fact weapons of mass destruction in violation of Florida statute seven ninety point one six six.' After an initial dismissal for procedural reasons, he amended the case with Doctor Francis Boyle's affidavit (writer of 'the 1989 biological weapons and anti terrorism act') and RFK Jr.'s statements with a US DHHS press release: 'these injections basically don't work for flu or COVID, and the risks outweigh the benefits.' He cites peer‑reviewed work 'COVID nineteen injections, harms and damages' and claims 'the virus in the vaccine contain evidence of manipulation' and 'violation of the biological weapons convention.' He promotes 'maximum pressure' and 'asymmetrical resistance,' and supports the 'San Antonio MRA Bioweapons Prohibition Act' template for 50 states and 55 countries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, thanks very much indeed. Welcome to the show. I am Jim Ferguson. I've got a great doctor with me here today. His name is doctor Joseph Sansom.
Doctor, it's wonderful to have you on the show. Thank you so much indeed for taking time out of my very busy schedule to be on with us. How are you doing?
Speaker 1: Well, I appreciate the opportunity to come on your show, Jim. You know, I like to say I'm a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism. That's an ever growing, agenda here. So
Speaker 0: Well, I it's been wonderful. I've been looking forward to this interview. I've followed your work. You're doing some amazing work all around the world. You're very well known within the medical establishment, but you're also very well known within the Freedom Community as well.
It's wonderful to actually have you here. For our our audience's sake, would you just say a little bit about your background, what you do, where you're located?
Speaker 1: Sure. I I live in Florida. I'm in Southwest Florida. You know, I I'm a psychotherapist. I actually specialize in clinical hypnosis.
That's why the brainwashing doesn't work on me. But, so I started getting involved, in May 2021 where I started worked about eighteen months to get my first band of jab resolution passed at, like, my local county Republican party. Got that passed in about 10 counties here in Florida, county county parties across the country. Eventually, the, Idaho and Arizona Republican parties passed that resolution too. That was a resolution declaring the COVID injections to be biological and technological weapons of mass destruction, obviously, calling for their prohibition because of that.
You know, at the time, that was back in '23. The the that that was, you know, trying to reframe this because when you're dealing with the issue of mandates, Jim, that's largely a psychological operation when we're talking about COVID injections or MRA nanoparticle injections because there's an embedded Ericksonian hypnotic command in there that it's okay to hit people with biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. So it needed to be reframed, and that's what I've been, you know, working on doing all along here. Just pretty much scrapping away. And then, then it moved on, to my first, what happened was I kinda was getting blocked by the party.
And so, no. I think it had an influence because in January '24, surgeon general Ladopo called for a halt to the injections here in Florida, and the Florida Department of Health came out and said they're they're risk to the human genome a potential risk to human genome and unsafe for, human use. So I think it had an effect. It helped give a little support for that, but nothing was happening. The governor just didn't do anything here in Florida, so I filed my first case in March 2024, and I did what's called a.
It's a it literally means we compel in Latin. It has very narrow case law on it. The court eventually said that you can only use that for a ministerial duty, like, say, the governor has to appoint somebody in sixty days or something like that, and then not for discretionary duty. I did find case law that says that you can use it for discretionary duty, but the court didn't wanna hear it. I lost my appeal on that in October '24, filed a new case in on 12/01/2024.
And in that case, I included doctor Francis Boyle's affidavit, which I used in my prior case. For the people that don't know, he's the law professor that wrote the 1989 biological weapons and anti terrorism act, here in The United States, which was The US domestic implementation of the biological weapons convention. And his affidavit clearly states that the MRA nanoparticle injections are biological weapons in violation of our federal law here in The United States as well as Florida's state weapons of mass destruction law. I I had other affidavits. I was in the process of collecting interrupt me.
I will, Jim. I was in the process of collect collecting affidavits in my case, and about six business days later, the court dismissed my case. Let me back up. So what I'm arguing in my case is that in in so in 2024 in 2023, in April 2023, I had congestive heart failure and a triple bypass heart surgery. And so, actually, at that time, I got doctor Francis Boyle while I was in the hospital to endorse my my Bandage Ab resolution, which helped a lot because I didn't want people to know I was in the hospital because people were working against me.
You know? So, what I argue in my case is that my congestive heart failure and assume triple bypass heart surgery are the result of shedding or transmission of this technology that's in the shots. And but then I also what I did in my motion for rehearing at the lower court level, I I brought in the because you have to preserve the arguments. I brought in the Florida Civil Rights Act. And what I'm arguing there is even if the court doesn't believe me that that's the cause of my heart issue, I can show that shedding is real.
And because I have a preexisting condition, I have a right to public accommodation with a reasonable degree of safety. You keep putting out these injections that continue to shed or transmit this technology, you're endangering me as well as anybody else with a condition. And so in my case, what I'm arguing is is that the trial I'm looking for an injunction for to get to prohibit the governor and attorney general, not the surrogate general, attorney general of the state of Florida from continuing to allow these injections to be distributed because they are, in fact, weapons of mass destruction in violation of Florida statute seven ninety point one six six. I also bring up our fraud law and our informed consent law. So I'm seeking an injunction, and I'm also seeking declaratory judgments from the court kind of as a backup.
Like, if they don't wanna do the injunction, they can say, yeah. This violates these laws, that kind of thing. So the court threw out my case, and there's I view that there's eight errors in that case. And so I filed an appeal, and I'm in the appellate court now. Now what happened was is on February 18, the attorney for both the governor and the attorney general of the state of Florida, this is governor DeSantis, the attorney for them filed a notice that they will not be filing a reply in this case.
And just so people understand, in my prior case, governor DeSantis' attorney argued to keep the MRI injections on the market. Just wrap your mind around that. Surgeon General Wow. Saying these are unsafe for humans. Governor, so there's a little dichotomy there.
So, what happened was is, they filed a notice saying that they're not gonna file an answer brief because when I served them the, initial complaint, I did not serve the defendants, the governor attorney general, with the summons from the the clerk of the court. They they might have thought that was my error. Now it wasn't. So the next day, on February 19, the first district court of appeal where I'm at here in Florida, and another decision basically says in part of that decision that you can't, dismiss a case prior to notice being served. So I my case was dismissed.
I have a hundred and twenty days to serve the defendants. My case was dismissed in six business days on December 9, nine days later. Okay? I did not have an I did not get a summon from the clerk of the court. The court dismissed the case before I even got a summon from the clerk.
Total procedural violation. And so on that procedural issue alone, the appellate court would have to go against their own decision, in my opinion, from February. I don't know what the court's gonna do, and I'm just laying out what it is. Now so so I I you know, I wanna let him file my appellate brief, and I filed I filed that case law as a notice. More recently, there's been some more recent case developments that I filed in my case as supplemental authorities.
One of them was, Robert Kennedy junior's, statement in his official capacity. I'd like to get these guys in their official capacity. So he's in his official capacity. They issued a press release, from the United States Department of Health and Human Services, as well as a video stating that the MRI injections basically don't work for flu or COVID, and the risks outweigh the benefits. Now then this kinda echoes what I argue in my case.
I only briefly talk about the DARPA stuff in my case because I didn't wanna go too deep at that point. What I'm arguing in my case is these don't work. The in fact, there's a there's no prophylactic effect. In fact, there's a negative efficacy. You're more likely to get that cough there, Jim, if you get the shot.
Right? So there's a negative efficacy.
Speaker 0: I can assure you, doctor, I've had no shots. I'm totally against it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's all good. So there's a negative effect as if they're they, they don't work. They cause disease, disability, death. You know?
And then I talk about the spike protein and nanotech, that kind of thing. And what I'm saying in my case is that they knew these were harmful. Now you and I know the people to plan this, it was premeditated. But at your typical bureaucratic level, in the Kansas versus Pfizer case, they're showing in that case that as early as December 2020, that Pfizer, Stanford, and Health and Human Services knew that the injections didn't work. So I'm arguing that they met the knowingness standard, basically, in my case.
You got specific intent. You got knowingness. At a minimum, they met them knowing. So now this now that's my opinion, but at least from the moment of health and human services statement with RFK junior, from that moment forward, it shows criminal intent if you keep the shots on the market. You're saying they don't work and it risk outweighed the benefits.
So to me, that's criminal intent. It meets the knowingness standard. And so I filed that in my case. And that's why I think, you know, ten years from now when people realize why their family members are all dying, they're gonna start looking for low hanging fruit. And if I were RFK junior, I he has the ability to pull these off the market just because they're harmful, let alone the bioweapon stuff.
So he should just do it. Now Well it you you know?
Speaker 0: Well, I I was just gonna say I absolutely commend the work that you're doing. You're absolutely on fire, doctor. You are doing some amazing things there, and you're holding the powers that be to account. You're also a professional witness in The Netherlands court case, the one that had Bill Gates, that had Burla, and and all these others, you know, the former prime minister of The Netherlands, Mark Ruta, cited. And I I have a particular interest in that.
I went to that court case. I sat in the court listening to what was being said, But you're also a professional witness in that case, aren't you?
Speaker 1: Yes. My involvement in that case is limited, but here's what I can tell you about it other than being a potential witness there. But I think I've been in communication with them for a little over a year, and I shared stuff on my case, like, before they filed this guy. I think they filed this case in September '24, if my memory serves me correctly. And then they survived the motion for dismissal in October, so that's really important.
And, what I did, though, is I I you know, communication with the attorneys there, I had arranged for doctor Francis Boyle to testify in that case. I connected them so he could testify, and, nobody knew about that. And that would have been think that would have been hard to suppress internationally because of who doctor Boyle was, you know, from a legal perspective and saying, you know, it's a bioweapon in a case. And, nobody knew about that. I the court didn't even know, so that was gonna kinda gonna be a surprise.
And then, about three weeks after he agreed to it, he passed away. Like I said, nobody knew about it, so I don't as far as I know, there's no evidence of anything nefarious there. It's possible because all our communications are monitored as we know. But I haven't heard any, you know I've heard some recent speculation, but far as I know, he got sick, went to the hospital, died. I haven't heard anything otherwise.
But that would've that would've been a big deal. Now that case in The Netherlands is different than mine, but it's they're both civil cases, but I'm just trying to get an injunction to get the shots off the market. But it's important for the same reason. If we get any jurisdiction to admit these are weapons, that then the whole the whole house of cards will eventually fall down. And in this case, they're they're suing on behalf of plaintiffs that were injured by the shots, and, they're doing it based on the fact that these are in fact bioweapons and genocide has been committed, which is true.
That that is true in my opinion. Like, if you look at the Japanese data that came out recently, where they had, like, six hundred and ten thousand excess deaths. If you, like, look at The United States based on population, that will be a underreporting factor of 41 on the VAERS data. So that would mean that one million five hundred and fifty eight thousand people died shortly after getting the shots. And I remind people, that's the people that died shortly afterwards.
That's not the people getting sick of heart attacks and cancers now because nobody's even remotely connecting those dots. Now I know, Ed Dowd had, come up with a number of about the excess insurance that's around 5,000 a week right now. So that'd be 250,000 a year. And I'll get it back to my case in a minute. But one of the things I wanna say to people, and this is really important, you don't need to be a scientist look.
I'm not a medical doctor. I'm a psychotherapist. You don't need to be a scientist or a medical doctor to realize that if you're giving people chronic diseases and illnesses, you are shortening their lifespans. Most people, you and I know, Jim, will have a shortened lifespan because of these injections. And I'm not saying that to scare people.
I have type one diabetes. On average, the lifespan is fifteen years less than everybody else. Throw in the heart condition, we'll make it through the interview maybe. But it's you know, if you have two identical twins and you give one of them asthma, it's they're not gonna live as long. It's just this is just common sense.
So these, injections are causing a host of diseases and disabilities, from neurological problems to, heart problems to cancers and and so on. And and to ignore that, you know, denial is not gonna help anybody here. We need to face the ugly truth of it that we've betrayed by our governments across the world. There's an international criminal go ahead, sir.
Speaker 0: I I was just gonna say, I I mean, the the the people I I interview scientists, professors, top doctors, you know, people with professional backgrounds who have all come to the same conclusion. This was premeditated. It was long in the planning. Very nefarious and very evil, actually. There's only you can't describe it as anything else other than pure evil to take a decision to harm people, to to to kill people.
I I would argue, and I'm not a I'm not a legal expert. I would say it was premeditated murder. When you talk about bioweapons, you're really serious about that. You consider these to be deliberate deployment of biological weapons en masse to the global population. Let me ask you.
What was the motivation in your opinion for whoever it was? And let maybe maybe let's discuss who who was it behind this. I call them globalists. I call them the parasitic class. But but who are these people, and why would they do that to their fellow human beings?
Speaker 1: I don't know if we're ever gonna really know who they are because they're the people behind the scenes that create the money out of thin air. They're they're the this is this international criminal class that rules our government. They're the ones who give the instructions to our elected officials why they never listen to us. So, for whatever reason, you know, maybe they really bought bought into, like, the mouth of stuff, like, about deep you know, overpopulation, stuff like that. I think they're sick and twisted too, though.
I call them psychopathic authoritarians. I mean, I'm about two thirds through my book on this, but, you know, there's a certain degree of sadism involved here. And they took advantage of the everyday sadism of, you know, your neighbors, basically. You know, when you saw the guy in the park without a mask being chased by the soccer moms, they they what they did is they they used the fear to get it going, but they, like, decoupled your typical human empathy, and and they put you into, like, a basically, you were basically aligning with the aggressor. And they did that.
So it's like it's like you put somebody in a certain position and they go on a power trip. Like, if you put them at motor vehicles or anywhere where they're in a gateway position, all of a sudden they go on a power trip. You know, that that sadism comes out. Most human beings possess this. You know, I do it in my sarcastic humor sometimes.
You know, if you're watching a slapstick comedy like the Three Stooges, there's a your friend slips and falls on the snow. You see they're okay. You start laughing. It's a little bit of a sadistic humor. In your most malicious forms, though, you see it in your serial killers that, you know, enjoy cannibalizing their victims and so on.
And these people are like that. They're getting off on humiliating us. They're they're getting off on come on. They made people wear those masks, like the face diapers, following the little lines on the floor. These were basically, first of all, they're hypnotic convincers, but second of all, that was to humiliate you.
They they were they were getting off on this. And and they're getting off on the pleasure of the pain of giving people chronic illnesses and diseases that's gonna cause a painful process of death over a decade or two, you know, depending on what condition you have. And only somebody that's totally sick and twisted would do this.
Speaker 0: And and I mean, it's like it's like those people that say you're gonna eat insects. You know, they're denigrating what it means to be human. They are attacking humanity. I've said before many times, they declared war on humanity and what it means to be a human being. You couple that with their obsession about these sustainable development goals agenda.
You we we call it UN agenda 2030 in Europe. But but the control, the dystopian totalitarian controls, and as you were describing these psychopaths, I was thinking of Dan Andrews in the state of Victoria as he presided over them. They were had the hardest lockdown on the planet. Two years they were locked in their homes, and he was getting off in it. Yeah.
It it was crazy. I mean, was bad in Canada, of course, as well. But these people these people are are are completely deranged, but highly dangerous. But for them to have produced and unleashed a biological weapon is a crime of genocide. Go back briefly to that court case in The Netherlands with Ardo van Kessel, the lead lawyer there, and all of these people that were cited to and facing charges of genocide.
These are are are akin to Nuremberg. These are the kind of things that was done as was uncovered after the Second World War by those people that were part of that whole establishment in Germany. Look, I I I most people that listen to the show know my own opinions on it, and they they they recognize that what they're talking about when I have great guests on like yourself, that they are really serious about what they're saying. But, I mean, these people have to be held to account. And, of course, you're pursuing these court cases are doing exactly that.
I mean, I that's like I say, I commend you for it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And I if I can, I just wanna bring up well, first of all, to answer your question, it's depopulation, technocratic slavery, and transhumanism? That's what's driving this. It it's like an outcropping of, you know, Darwinism or so on. It's just it's evolved into this to use the word evolution, it's evolved into this twisted ideology.
But I wanna if I could point out a couple things I I did also find in my case. Recently, there was a peer reviewed journal article. It's called COVID nineteen injections, harms and damages, a non exhaustive conclusion. Doctor Andrew Zeviets was the lead author, doctor Villa, doctor Peter McCullough. You have a you have 11, very highly well known authors on this paper.
This paper that I'm holding right here can't see it there, but this paper basically is a peer reviewed journal article in the, Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. And I I wanna read this to you. My eyes are this bad. But the virus in the vaccine contain evidence of manipulation, and those specific manipulations match the goals of four of seven categories of gain of functions and experiments. Finally, these manipulations represent a a violation of the biological weapons convention.
So I filed this peer reviewed journal article recently in my case as a supplemental authority because it's echoing what I'm saying in my case and doctor Boyle's affidavit and the other affidavits. This paper is important. It should be circulated, because the more voices we have telling the truth, the more power to that voice. Remember, these twisted globalists rule because of the illusion of power. All power rests on an illusion.
Even the person following your order has to believe they have to follow that order. And and the more pressure I believe in maximum pressure. That's why I have my case. That's why I'm pushing my bill. And I think we all have to do maximum pressure pressure.
There need to be more cases. And and don't let anybody tell you you can't sue. Okay? Because, Jim, if something happened to you and you went into an attorney's office, if I were an attorney, we'd all be sick for we'd all be talking around about how to come up with a legal we either find a legal argument or we would create a legal legal argument to argue your case. And so what you need to do is find a legal argument or create a legal argument to file a case.
That's what needs to be happening all over the place. There need to be cases cut crawling out of the woodwork here because Mhmm. Remember, they're murdering the people you know and love. Sitting on the sidelines right now is not really an option, and it's not gonna stop. So I filed that and wonder wonder go ahead.
Speaker 0: Well, I was just gonna say, I mean, let let's get into the the the the real mechanics of it. But before we do that, we're gonna go to a very quick break. Don't go away. You're gonna wanna hear what doctor Sansko's gonna say about this. We'll be right back.
Sorry. I forgot to remind you. We were just about to do a a quick hard break. Don't worry. And we're back.
Doctor Sansson, we were just about to talk about the the legal frameworks for this and why it's so important for people to bring cases. And you say, don't don't be sidetracked. Don't listen to people that say you haven't got a case because it's important that we do hold these people accountable. As you said just before we went to the break, they are killing people that we love, family members, husbands, wives, children, grandmothers, grandparents. They've got to be held to account, haven't they?
Speaker 1: And remember, when the Florida Department of Health is saying that this is a potential threat to the human genome, that means it's a potential threat to the future existence of our species in in some way or form. And so sitting on the sidelines right now is not an option. Remember, when somebody speaks the truth, it wakes people up. A lot of people are familiar with Solomon Asch's studies on conformity where there's, like, one line on the board and three lines over here, and they had 12 confederates in the room, and and all 12 confederates said the same wrong answer. And, like, thirty five or 38% of the time, something like that, the actual participants said the wrong answer, either through social pressure or just doubting their own cognitions.
But when they did the follow-up and you had one more confederate in there that actually said the right answer, 95% of the time, the participants said the right answer. So the truth matters, and the more people stating the truth, the more power it's gonna have. And that's why it's important to file cases. One one more thing I just wanna mention on my case because this is extremely important. On September 3, the Florida Florida surgeon general Joseph Latifo, doctor Joseph Latifo, an MD with a PhD, both from Harvard, I think.
And doctor Latipo was out there with the governor DeSantis, and it was made big news because, basically, the state of Florida is gonna get rid of all vaccine mandates. This is good because it applies to all mandates. It's not just talking about the COVID mandate. So your kids are going to school. They won't be forced any type of vaccine.
So the and what the surgeon general did is he removed some of the rule rules, and now they need some legislation to get rest of the red rest of the mandates. But in that speech, the surgeon general of the state of Florida said that the COVID MRA injections are a poison. That should have been huge news. That should have overshadowed everything else he said in that statement. And I'm tell you why.
If you look up Florida statute seven ninety point one six six, that's an illegal definition of a weapon of mass destruction. Talks about poisonous biological agents and chemical agents and so on. And so he literally threw out the legal definition in the law. So I took that transcript, and I filed that in the video as a supplemental authority in my case. And, again, I don't know what the court is gonna do, but, again, I have the and he's speaking in it.
This is not on Tucker Carlson's, not on Jim Ferguson's show. He's speaking at a conference where they're talking about this policy to get rid of the mandates stating that the MRA is a is a poison, and that meets the legal definition. That is legally significant. That should be used in other cases as well, but I did file it in my case. Now look.
I don't know what's gonna happen with my case, but I'm gonna tell you that, the issues it was dismissed on, I think they're all errors by the court. And it just like she's saying, I didn't meet the criteria for injunction or declaratory judgment. I did, especially if you consider the surgeon general statement. And so I filed that. I think that should be big news.
And, also, if I could just add, this doesn't do with my case, but recently, the World Council for Health here in Florida is the first, as far as I know, the first health freedom or medical freedom organization to declare the MRA nanoparticle injections, biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. And they they also endorsed my bill, the San Antonio MRA Bioweapons Prohibition Act. And so I think that the there is a shift occurring. It's just we need more people to start speaking the truth now. Don't be afraid.
They're they're winning because of your fear.
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's exactly right.
Speaker 1: Jim, if you're within the sound of my voice, you need to step up and act. They are murdering your family and friends. They're gonna continue to get sick and die. We need to stop this, and then we need to get these brilliant experts to start finding ways to mitigate the damage. But if we can't even admit that we're being hit with a continuous weapon, we're screwed.
Speaker 0: Well, the mainstream media the lying mainstream media played a huge role in the psychological operation that took place, and they they perpetrated it, and they still perpetrated. But you're right. As you said earlier on in this interview, it's time to pick a side. There is no sitting on the fence any longer. What they've done is is they declared war on humanity, and these people that were involved in the deployment of this, whoever they are, but there are people that Bill like Bill Gates that come to mind.
He was pushing the mRNA technology. He's still pushing it. He's instrumental with the World Health Organization. He's one of the main funders of it. It's his appointees that go in there, Tedros, so called doctor.
He's certainly not a medical doctor. He is a former member of the People's Tigray Liberation Front, a violent prescribed terrorist organization still on the prescribed list of The United States. What on earth is he doing in there? If if if this was a biological weapon, then surely the US Department of Defense must have had knowledge of this.
Speaker 1: I I I think that doctor Boyle's affidavit, which I got sitting right over here, he he mentions that it was a DARPA project. So clearly, he mentions, Ralph Barack in North Carolina, you know, as well as the Wuhan. So, I mean, yeah, COVID the COVID the virus itself was a biological weapon because it was developed through gain of function research, which according to doctor Boyle, who wrote the law, so I'm gonna take his authority on that. And it's also in the COVID injection, so that alone makes the injections a weapon. But now you have to look at things like the s v forty promoter, which is in the nanoparticle injections.
You know, I interviewed Judith Barry Baker. It was she's she was Lee Harvey Oswald's girlfriend. She was, like, 19 at the time, and she said they were working on that back in the sixties. It was a bioweapon back then. So, like, there there's there's a 101 ways to argue that this is a bioweapon.
In my case, I'm kinda keeping it simple, because I don't want the court to be intimidated. Like, this is a defense thing and try to back off. No. I'd rather not come out when we're if we can get the discovery at some point. Because in a sense, I'm not as far along as The Netherlands case because they survived the motion to dismiss.
In my case, the court did it. I'm in the appellate court. So I need to I need to win to get back to square one. But, yeah, I think that this is clearly part of a broader depopulation campaign. And, like I said, it's being driven by depopulation, transhumanism, and and really this idea of technocratic technocratic slavery.
So, yeah, they wanna get rid of a certain portion of us, and then they they want to imagine, like, somebody with your your worst obsessive compulsive tendencies. And imagine that, like you know, it's like imagine that being the person that's trying to run the world. That's what we're dealing with. They can't handle anything they can't control because their ideology and their faith is rooted in fear. Believe me, they fear us.
How do you know? Because they use fear to put you in that box. They they use fear on you because they know it works because they're driven by fear.
Speaker 0: They they have
Speaker 1: no empathy for their thoughts.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, on the mind
Speaker 1: stuff, yeah. Mean
Speaker 0: On on the on the on the psychological stuff, I mean, you you know how the human mind works. You know how they use fear to bully, intimidate, and change people's rational thoughts, and fear was used extensively throughout this entire campaign. What would you say to the the the likes of people that are that are looking at this that that have buried loved ones that that suddenly find that early onset cancer instead of going to stage one, stage two, straight to stage three, straight to stage four. Sometimes people going to the doctor finding they've maybe only got a matter of weeks or months to live. They're they're crying out for justice right now, and and they're they're very appreciative of people like you who are taking this fight into the front lines to call them out and to hold them to account.
What do you say to people, though, that say, will there ever be justice?
Speaker 1: Well, I think that eventually, when this pendulum switches the other way, people that perpetrated this will have nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. They're gonna be hunted down.
Speaker 0: There are billions of sins.
Speaker 1: I say that, Jim. I say that with absolutely zero fear. These people will eventually be hunted down. They will have nowhere to run, nowhere to hide.
Speaker 0: And and let's not forget, it wasn't just civilians they targeted. They targeted members of the the US military and other militaries around the world. They targeted police forces. They've had many, many ill effects, of this as well. In fact, when president Trump came in back into office, he scrapped all of that.
He reinstated people who had lost careers, some of them very, very senior officers within the US military who had refused to take the shots, which I think was the right thing to do. But, you know, if if if it was I don't wanna get too much into the the sort of the DARPA side of things or the Department of Defense, but if it was a biological weapon, there had to have been people that knew what they were doing. And I wonder because it's been it's been suggested to me. Why now? Well, I think this has been a long time in planning.
I think this is going back decades as you quite correctly alluded to there. But I think also that perhaps with the advent of AI technology, robotics, advanced engineering, where they don't need human beings to pick the crops. They can use drones to harvest the apples. They can use machines to harvest the crops. They don't need drivers.
They don't need people in in planes. They can actually use AI to fly to distribute goods and services. Maybe they thought we just don't need the vast majority of these so called useless eaters as they sometimes refer to ordinary people around the world. Do you think there's some truth to that?
Speaker 1: Yes. I do. I I again, I think this is a broader campaign, and I think those of us that they leave around, they want this technocratic slavery. You probably want us around for spare parts to experiment on. And then, you know, the the whole transhumanism, these twisted billionaires, they're so empty inside that they wanna try to find a way to live forever and merge with technology.
And and I think that that's the old the irony is that they ever succeeded, it'd be the ultimate ultimate Faustian deception. You'd be stuck in this dimension forever. How stupid is that? But, look. Let me say this to you.
You know, you asked about the people you know, the truth itself is never what's painful. It's our resistance to the truth that causes the emotional pain and so on. And so accepting the truth is gonna is gonna actually free you. And you're gonna die. Get over it.
I'm saying that to everybody. You're gonna die. Get over it. Now the question is is do you do you grovel on your knees like a coward, or you stand up like a man or woman and fight against this? And and look, most of our politicians are coward, corrupt, or out of touch.
I'm gonna say at this point, most of them are either cowards or corrupt. I know that governor DeSantis here in Florida knows that these are a weapon. RFK junior, someone should introduce him to the guy that wrote that book, the real Anthony Fauci. He knows that they're a weapon. And, honestly, Trump knows that they're a weapon.
Donald Trump could could stop this in The United States with an executive order. RFK junior, as secretary of health and human services, could simply pull them off the market because they're they're unsafe. Attorney general Pam Bondi in The United States is empowered by 18 USC one seventy five chapter 10 biological weapons to seek an injunction to stop these MRI injections because they are weapons. She can do that. And then the governor DeSantis here in Florida look.
If I were governor here in Florida, I'd have the constitutional crisis with the federal government and say, go to hell. You're not gonna murder our people anymore. Well, why are people so afraid? Well, I get it. They assassinate people.
I get it. But don't run for office if you're afraid of that. Don't don't put yourself in that position. And what I think what goes on, Jim, is I think they find people that are corrupt and they run them up the flagpole. You know, it used to be like they they corrupt somebody in power.
Now those are the people they're putting in power. They're already bought and paid for. And But we we see
Speaker 0: the World Economic Forum. The the pre the the founder, the the previous he's no longer involved in in running it, Klaus Schwab, bragging about having infiltrated the the cabinets of of Canada and various other nations. We see that in The United Kingdom. You know, the Conservative Party in The UK is no longer conservative. They're globalists the same as the Labour Party, which which is pretty far left as well, almost Marxist, I would argue.
But they are globalists, and they are pushing out globalist agendas. It doesn't matter who you vote for. You're absolutely right, doctor Salonson. I absolutely agree with you. I think they find people that are actually already corrupt, that they can corrupt further.
Those are the people that get advanced into those positions because they will do what they're told. They're either so corrupted that they're either blackmailed or they simply go along with it because they are like that anyway. Where where do you see this going in the next sort of year to two years, maybe three years? Do you see a breakthrough coming in terms of the truth? Because I would argue that we are winning the information war, which is why they're constantly hitting us, with censorship laws.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I do agree because what Health and Human Services did with RFK Jr. Is they did a a textbook limited hangout. They admitted there was a problem. They said there's no prophylactic effect. There is outweigh the benefits.
And then and then they turn around and then he turns around and says, we're gonna have placebo blind controlled studies moving forward. He knows they're a weapon. Stop. I mean, that that's that's still textbook. I think what we need to do is continue with maximum pressure.
Don't cheer on the people that you think are on your side. Those are the ones you probably need to put more pressure on because they might actually do some. They need to fear us more than they fear their masters. Now I have my bill out there. It's on my website, josephsandstone.com.
You can download it. I have a version for all 50 US states. It's been introduced in Minnesota by representative Shane Mechlin, and and, the federal version. I also have a version for 55 countries, all 48 European countries, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, Japan, South Korea, and The Philippines. And the whole point is we need to get a jurisdiction somewhere, whether it's through a legal case or through legislation, to recognize that these are weapons.
Now my bill is unique because it's the only bill that recognizes that the NRA nanoparticle injections are already illegal according to existing bioweapons or weapons of mass destruction laws and, you know, seeking their prohibition. And it also creates a criminal and civil liability for non enforcement. And so if you present the evidence to a government official and they don't, do anything about it, they can be charged as if they violated law. And I get it. You know, the prosecutor might not wanna, you know, prosecute their brother-in-law, the sheriff, and that's why I put that civil backstop there that you can then sue them.
Because in a criminal law, you need to have a civil cause of action. That's one of the arguments that they could make against me in my case, but I'm also arguing that, there are constitutional right violations and so on. And I'm arguing that the weapons of mass destruction law is also a public health law. And so what I'd encourage people to do look. This is a template.
You can improve upon it. But what was happening is is I was seeing here in The US, like, seven states last year came out with bills that were trying to stop the shots, but none of them were admitting their weapon. I'm like, they're already illegal. So I get it. We don't need a bill if somebody had enforced the law.
But this is just another way to put pressure on there because if this bill starts popping up in enough places, what's gonna gonna happen is they're gonna try to get in front of it, and they're gonna take the shots off the market. And so the only way we win is if we put constant pressure on that. If we just sit back and think we're safe right now because it's the boil and the frog thing. They turn down the temperature a little bit. You get used to your new normal, and then they're gonna turn it up again.
And and you're seeing it here in New York. By the way, I just found out recently that, Epstein's accomplice, Chris Lane Maxwell, sister is one of the founders of the WF. She's I think she's in the I intelligence just literally I didn't know that until, like, a few weeks ago, but you'd be amazed
Speaker 0: if don't know, Jim. But Well, hey. Listen. We we all learn. We're all learning new things every day.
I'm exactly the same, but, yeah, I was aware of that one. In fact, I posted on it probably a good eighteen months ago. Yeah. They were they were dark. They were dark.
They were heavily involved and connected. There's a lot of things still that haven't come out there about that. But when you when you talk about the the justice that people are deserving of mean, most people just wanna get on with their lives. They just wanna live their lives in peace, but I completely concur with you. It's better to to die on your feet as a man or as a woman, as a freedom fighter, than to live in your knees as a slave.
That's what they want. That's how they use fear. They bully, and they intimidate, and they mandate. They coerce. They do all these things.
But the critical thinkers the critical thinkers were awake and and saw the the red flags rising. I I'm I'm always interested to ask you. It's first time you've been on with me, doctor. Hope it's not the last. I'm sure it won't be.
But let me ask you. Going back to sort of late twenty nineteen, you know, sort of December time, I'm thinking, wait a I'm I'm I'm seeing these things happening. I'm hearing about this. There's something not right. When when did you sort of see those major red flags?
And and bearing in mind, I mean, you are somebody that understands the human mind maybe better than others. Maybe you had an advantage. But can you remember when you saw those red flags and when it was that you
Speaker 1: saw Immediately. Immediately. In 2019. Yeah. Well, you know, in my prior life, I was chairman of one of Pat Buchanan's presidential campaigns.
He's the father of America First movement here in America, and I knew nine eleven was a false flag. So it was the same playbook as that. It was the same playbook. What I tell people is look at the effects sometimes. Like, when nine I I was suspicious when nine eleven happened, but about, I don't know, three or four weeks after it happened, they opened up the borders in The United States.
I'm like, wait a minute. If the delivery system here is an immigrant or illegal immigrant, why would you open up your borders? And then you wanna go attack these other countries, turn up the hornets. I mean, it was just common sense. And, like, even now with the, with the Charlie Kirk thing that going on here with that brutal assassination, there's a lot of mass media hypnosis involved in that.
And and, now they're trying to go after the First Amendment to with hate crime laws and stuff. This is the Trump administration. So I I think that, when the media has you all focusing on something, trying to get you emotionally energized no matter what it is, you need to step back. These are the same people that told you to wear a mask, follow little lines on the floor, and poison your family members. Okay?
So when the whole of the me what I'm looking at right now is what are these people doing right now that I'm not aware of because they've been focused on all Charlie Kirk stuff the last couple weeks. And so because, look, it's still not okay to talk about how the shots are harmful in the mainstream media. And it's not okay to talk about the fact that they're a weapon in most of the alternative media. And so the fact that because, you know, a lot of that's fixed too. But, I mean, the fact that they want you to focus on something like that, that's when you need to step back.
And I intuitively do that. And so to answer your question, I think the people that were awake earlier on, it was prior experience of some kind. I've had these discussions with people in detail, I think it's just somewhere in your life, of course, you'd be a little more critical, not trust authority like that. And and so I joke around and say, like, it's not the honor roll students that are gonna save the world. It's the reformed juvenile delinquents because they they they don't just trust.
Speaker 0: I agree. It's I do.
Speaker 1: So you can tell we were both juvenile delinquents. Right? Right?
Speaker 0: Absolutely. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So and and reason I think it is is because they they respect the authority too much. They're always looking for the accreditations. And academics are really you gotta watch out for the academics because, you know, their whole, like, their whole sense of worth is based on their intelligence and and get a little rewards about their intelligence. Right? So they're easily manipulated.
Yeah. Believe it or not, most people don't realize this. The smarter you are, the better hypnotic subject you are. It's not it's the opposite of what people think. And so Yeah.
Speaker 0: It's it's the same it's the same in in in cults. You know? It's it's often very, very smart people that get deceived and and and brought into it. Yeah. It's incredible.
Speaker 1: Yes. Yeah. Yeah. So I just because someone's really smart, don't think that they can easily be brainwashed. Look.
Look at it like this. Everybody on this planet's consciousness is innocent. Right? Look at their consciousness like the hard drive of a computer, and the software is the belief systems. And no matter what, you you you could look at a bunch of information.
In order to adopt a belief system, there's an intuitive leap that occurs. Even if you're a scientist looking at data and you end up coming up with your, you know, conclusions, there's always an intuitive leap. And so that can be the the person with the highest IQ on the planet. If I if I I get the best hard drive on my computer, but if I put crappy software in there, it's the same thing as if I adopt crappy beliefs. And, unfortunately, you know, we have to take an intuitive leap to adopt a belief system.
This might be a little abstract, but it's just smart people can be fooled, and they can be conned. And sometimes it's harder with them because it's always easier to con someone than to get them to admit they were conned. And so I've I've often go ahead.
Speaker 0: I've I've often I've often asked people, you know, because I'm interested. You you know, what makes some people see it and some people don't, and it's not to do with intelligence. It's not to do with those things. It it is, I guess, the best answer I've ever had is that some people have, and I think you've you've hit on this. You've either gone through something where you you you question things more.
You know, you have a critical mind, and that critical skills, that critical thinking skills is is a was a way for you to see through the smoke and mirrors. But a lot of people, were bullied. A lot of people were intimidated. A lot of people were faced with losing their careers. A lot of people were completely duped into it.
The biggest worry for me is, are they likely to do it again? Do you think that they might try and do that something like this again?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I do or something else. I mean, they're coming at us in all different ways. You know, the injection is just one part of the big piece of the puzzle, but it's a very big part. But, yeah, the what we have going on though right now is a little different.
I think that a growing I think there's a recent poll showing, like, 57 of people realize that major side effects were caused from the injections here in The US. And, what we're having is a little different because I think a lot of people know what happened to them and their families, but they don't wanna admit it because they're afraid. It's like, I don't wanna look at that test result. You know? And and they don't wanna admit that they were hit with a poison.
Let me tell you right now. In this, study that I mentioned earlier, they talk a little bit about doctor Merovig Villa's preliminary data, and she's dealing with, like, thirty five hundred injection victims here in Florida in the villages. It's, the largest senior, community in America. And, she so it is a little bit of an older population, but her preliminary data showed, like, seventy five percent of the people, even asymptomatic people, have immune system problems. So you're gonna see more cancer developing more as your immune system starts failing, you're gonna see more disorders.
And she's got, like I think it's, a thousand people in this in her research. You know? So it's not a small sample size. So that's really, not good information there. And so here's the thing, though.
Pretending that you weren't poison isn't gonna interrupt the fact that you have an immune system problem right now. And and that's not no. Look. You can your your mind is very powerful. You can use that for self healing, and I encourage that.
But you still need to accept the truth of what you're dealing with. You know? Pretending you don't have a broken leg isn't gonna, you know, put it back together. And I think that people need to I think that's the big thing. It's their fear right now because nobody wants to look at the ugly like that.
Look. I get it. You need to live your life, you know, and enjoy life. I'm not telling anybody not to do that, but you it's really I don't know how people can look away because I can't. I'm just watching, like, people dying, and it's, like, not okay.
Speaker 0: Think one of the things once you see it, you can't unsee it. When you look at the data, when you peel back the layers and you look at what's really going on, that's horrific, and and it still gets me. To think that there are people out there that would have taken decision to murder millions of people, potentially billions of people around the planet, it it it I find it difficult to understand how anybody could have a mindset like that. I I I couldn't do something like that. We're not talking about war.
We're not talking about soldiers. We're not talking about being a general sending forces in or sending somebody that that that signed up to to go to war, on potentially a mission that that they're not gonna come back from. That's different. We're talking about men and women and children and pregnant mothers. What kind of mentality does it take to do something like that to people?
I mean, I I'll be honest with you. They're gonna pay the most terrible price at some point.
Speaker 1: Well, that's why I call it psychopathic authoritarianism. It kinda takes the ideology out of it and just says what it actually is. It's a lack they have lack of empathy. They have no empathy for their fellow human being, and they get a sadistic pleasure in causing the pain. And and I think that's that's really what's going on there.
And I don't yeah. It's hard for a normal per person to but it's really you don't wanna look at other people. You and I, Jim, we can deal and trade honestly and that kind of thing. But if you're dealing with someone that's a con artist and a total snake, you need to know that. You can't treat them the way you treat me or vice versa.
You need know who you're dealing with. And understand that when you're dealing with these people, you are dealing with psychopathic authoritarians. You're dealing with sick, twisted people that are looking at you like a useless food eater. And you're right. They've they've targeted a civilian population globally.
And if people aren't getting this imagine getting 10 or 12 of your friends together with similar political, cultural backgrounds. You're having dinner, a couple drinks or something, whatever you're doing. You're gonna start bickering over the nuances of every issue you guys talk about. Right? How did they get the whole planet to follow the same unscientific stupid protocols?
That's not normal. That's not organic. This was a military operation for sure in that sense. It's, you know, the deep state, whatever you wanna call it, the shadow governments that run everything. And and I think that's that's a legitimate thing that occurred.
That that really is. I would say, don't be afraid. It's the fear to trap you to begin with. It's the truth that's gonna set you free. Look.
Fear is a false god. You you you worship fear thinking it will protect you. You worry about paying your next bill thinking it's gonna help you pay the bill. Other than the you know, when you're getting chased by the tiger and you you got the fight or flight thing going on, fear is a false god. It will not protect you.
No way, shape, or form. And I got news for you. Deep down, the guilt you're feeling, forgetting your family members to get the shot and stuff like, deep down, if you really get down to the and distill it to its core, that's a way for you to subconsciously try to manipulate god. Guess what? God knows you're full of crap.
Don't worry about it. So, don't don't buy into the guilt about it. Don't buy into the fear about it. That's what got you in trouble. You got guilted in getting the shot so you wouldn't get grandma sick or the grandkids sick or and that kind of don't buy into that.
That's what got you into the problem. And I you just need to face it head on, and I encourage people to try to push the bill to come up with litigation. I like to say asymmetrical warfare requires asymmetrical resistance. They're hitting us eight ways sideways. We need to hit them eight ways sideways.
Speaker 0: That's a great quote. I I I think I'll be repeating that, but I'll be giving you the credit for it. You know, we're approaching the last part of the segment. This is going past all too fast. Gotta get you back on with me again, doctor.
But as I always do with my incredible guests, I'm gonna give the floor to you. I'm gonna give you the last and final word. On you go.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna reiterate what I just said. Don't be afraid. I want you to remember also that you need to be we need to be on the offense. Playing defense is how we we'll lose. That's why continuously, I'm going behind enemy lines here.
No. This is a bioweapon. We need to get them defending that position, then you'll never have to worry about mandates again. If we can make that shift occur, then we'll be discussing who do we prosecute. Okay?
Because this idea of unfettered government is evil. Government is not god. And there's a strong correlation with the countries that had the strongest lockdowns versus the less stringent ones based on their gun laws. Even here in The United States, there's a correlation on the states that had more strict lockdowns and the states that had better gun laws. A population that is unarmed is a slave population.
In Florida, the reason governor DeSantis backed off of his four month lockdown is because people were starting to pull guns on people in the Walmart and stuff like that when they're trying to force masks on them. It was bubbling up underneath them, and he had to get in front of it. So we need a lot of changes, you know, that need to occur in in every country, but don't ever think that giving up your liberty is ever going to protect you. It will never protect you ever. You're just gonna be a slave.
And you're remember, lockdown is a prison term. And so what I I I guess what I'm gonna say is just fight for your freedom, fight for our species. It's our species we're talking about here. This is planet Earth. It's our planet, and we need to defend it against these psychopathic authoritarians.
Speaker 0: Absolutely well said, and absolutely agree with every word you've said. You know, it is written, we've not been given a spirit of fear, but of power and love and a sound mind. We need to fight for humanity because if we don't, who will? Doctor. Sandstone, it's been wonderful to have you on with me, thank you so much indeed.
I know you're how busy you are, but I've been looking forward to this interview and I've got to be honest, it's gone past in an absolute flash. Just so much thanks to you and and you are absolutely incredible, the work that you're doing, I commend you for it, thank you for being with us.
Speaker 1: Thank you, sir.
Speaker 0: And to all the people out there listening, you need to wake up. There there is no more sitting on the fence as you've heard Joseph Sandstone saying, it's time to pick a side, and it's better sometimes to die on your feet as a man or a woman fighting for freedom, for the truth, fighting for humanity than as a slave on your knees. It's time to pick a side. This is Jim Ferguson, until next time, we'll speak soon. Bye bye for now.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
mRNA as bioweapon—negative efficacy, shedding risks, DARPA roots." Poll: mRNA Mandates: Psyop or Medicine?
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Filed mandamus vs. DeSantis/Moody (dismissed but appealed)—cites Boyle on gain-of-function, SV40 promoter (Epstein-era bioweapon). FL Surgeon General Ladapo: "Poison—risks outweigh benefits." Criminal intent post-2024? Nuremberg-level. (At 3:52)
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Mandates as hypnosis—decoupled empathy, neighbor-on-neighbor power trips. Globalists' depopulation/transhumanism: "Technocratic slavery, sadistic pleasure in humiliation." Fear's their god—truth's ours. "Asymmetrical warfare: Maximum pressure via lawsuits." (At 17:21)
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
"They're hunting us—hunt them back. Nowhere to run." Sansone's bill template (http://josephsansone.com) for 50 states/55 countries. Die on your feet, not knees. Full interview: Bookmark if awakening—reply your fight! Tag @JimFergusonUK @JosephSansone
Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone | Substack
Discussion about politics, economics, mental health, health and wellness, liberty and natural rights, philosophy and spirituality, resisting global genocide, and just about everything. Click to read Mind Matters and Everything Else with Dr. Joseph Sansone, a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers.
josephsansone.com
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I reflect on the insights of Henry Kissinger, who warned against mass migration leading to inevitable conflict. This aligns with a globalist strategy that creates social friction to justify increased control through digital IDs and surveillance. I believe we should reject this cycle of manufactured disorder and instead focus on securing our borders, reasserting our sovereignty, and defending our culture. It's time to break free from the narrative that chaos is necessary for order.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 ENGINEERED CHAOS: THE BORDER PLAYBOOK When Klaus Schwab’s mentor, Henry Kissinger, called it a “grave mistake” to flood the West with people from totally different cultural and religious backgrounds—because conflict was inevitable—he wasn’t guessing. He was hinting at the plan. This is the globalist formula: Mass migration shock Social friction & crisis “Only we can fix it” — with digital IDs, speech controls, surveillance, and centralized power Crisis → Control is not a bug; it’s the business model. We don’t have to play along. Secure borders. Reassert sovereignty. Defend culture. End the cycle where manufactured disorder is used to sell you “order.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Transcript features Henry, born in Germany and a Holocaust survivor. The speaker asks how it feels 'if now on Berlin streets Arabs are celebrating the attack on Israel publicly and are distributing sweets to other people?' The question binds his personal history to current events. It continues with: 'It was a grave mistake to let in so many people of totally different cultural and religious and concepts because it creates a pressure group inside each country that does that.' The dialogue underscores tensions surrounding immigration, cultural and religious diversity, and public demonstrations tied to international conflict in Berlin today and beyond.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Henry, for you being born in Germany and having survived the Holocaust, how does it feel if now on Berlin streets Arabs are celebrating the attack on Israel publicly and are distributing sweets to other people? It was a grave mistake to let in so many people of totally different cultural and religious and concepts because it creates a pressure group inside each country that does that.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Truth resonates clearly, while lies disguise themselves. I see through the façade of those promoting "safety" while imposing new restrictions. What was once sold as compassion has evolved into Digital ID and CBDCs, creating a system of control over our choices and movements. This goes beyond politics; it’s a spiritual battle between light and darkness, reminiscent of ancient warnings about dependence on a mark for commerce. We must resist, uphold our values, and share our message boldly.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
TRUTH HAS A SOUND. LIES WEAR A COSTUME. ⚔️ You can hear it when the mask slips— the wolf in sheep’s clothing preaching “safety,” while writing new restrictions behind the curtain. They sold the mandate years as compassion. Now it’s BritCard and Digital ID—the same script with a sharper edge. Digital ID + CBDCs = programmable permission. What you buy, where you go, whether you access services—all switchable. Call it “modernization.” It’s the architecture of control. This isn’t just politics. It’s spiritual. Light vs. darkness. The ancient warning: a world where buying and selling depends on their mark. We are the resistance—the salt and the light. We do not bow. We do not comply. Stand your ground. Speak the truth. Spread the word. @realrikkidoolan
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 foregrounds grace, forgiveness, and integrity in leadership. "I loved what Erica Kirk did on the microphone at the memorial for Charlie Kirk, and when she stated that she forgives the killer of Charlie Kirk, and that was true Christianity," and "not even to want him to get capital punishment because you don't wanna take away that chance that that person can repent and come to the lord Jesus Christ." "It's not about being good... It's about the ultimate good deed that was done by Jesus Christ... by dying on that cross and rising again to take away all of our sins, meaning that his grace covers a multitude of sins." "Jesus Christ is available to you."
Speaker 1: "it's one of the most historical, accurately historical records there is." "Our actions speak louder than words." "the first order of any government is to protect its citizens" and there have been "multiple failures over many decades." "it's not about left and right anymore... it's about doing the right thing." "candidates will be fielded." "not looking for career politicians" "people that understand what life is all about."
Speaker 0: "Absolutely. ... We've had enough of career politicians... people are looking for something real now, some something true, something with integrity." "This is why the people love Tommy Robinson. ... millions of people at his call came onto the streets," "he is a man of integrity. He's a man of honesty. He's a working class man that speaks the truth."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Explore grace, forgiveness, and integrity in today's leadership on our journey together. I loved what Erica Kirk did on the microphone at the memorial for Charlie Kirk, and when she when she stated that she forgives the killer of Charlie Kirk, and that was true Christianity. And even not only just to forgive him, but not even to want him to get capital punishment because you don't wanna take away that chance that that person can repent and come to the lord Jesus Christ. So there is no this is not about being good. Alright?
It's not about how how many times you help somebody cross the road. It's not about how many times you can do good deeds. No. It's about the ultimate good deed that was done by Jesus Christ thousands of years ago by dying on that cross and rising again to take away all of our sins, meaning that his grace covers a multitude of sins. So Jesus Christ is needed by each and every person in order for our wrongs and our imperfection to be washed clean.
So a message for everybody is that Jesus Christ is available to you. Doesn't matter what you're going through or where you've been, he's available and this is the real good news of Jesus Christ.
Speaker 1: You know something, there's been many people in the past, very smart people, authors, researchers who have gone out of their way to disprove the Bible, to to say it's not historical, that it's all make believe and many of them, many of them have suddenly realized actually it is true. In fact, it's one of the most historical, accurately historical records there is. I think there's a lot of truth to to still come out about what where the direction of travel is coming from, but we see, we we, you know, the Bible often talks about, what people say and what people do. Our actions speak louder than words and I think when we see people abusing their position of power, whether they're a prime minister, whether you're a cabinet minister, whether you're a member of the the British parliament or indeed any other parliament, the first order of any government is to protect its citizens, its people. And we've seen multiple failures over many decades now with our respective governments.
And I don't think this is so much about left and right anymore. I know Ben Abibault, the leader of advance UK office says it's not about left and right, it's about doing the right thing. Yeah. And sometimes you've got to grasp the nettle or grab the bull by the horns as they say and deal with these big issues. And, how important is it from your point of view as a matter of faith that we see that kind of faithful leadership, those kind of strong leaders rising across the country from all ordinary walks of life, know, everybody from ordinary backers are starting to come in and join Advance UK and I'm sure in the not too distant future, candidates will be fielded.
But we're not looking for career politicians, we're looking for people that understand what life is all about. Would you agree with that?
Speaker 0: Absolutely. I think we've had enough of career politicians, we've had enough of people that are willing to sell out their souls for a career or for a pay packet or whatever it is, and people are looking for something real now, some something true, something with integrity, and that's what I know that Ben is offering as an individual and the Advance UK party is offering as a party. This is why the people love Tommy Robinson. This is why no matter how much he gets defamed, no matter how much they attack him and lie about him, people still follow him. I mean, millions of people at his call came onto the streets.
Why? Because he is a man of integrity. He's a man of honesty. He's a working class man that speaks the truth, that takes it on the chin when he gets clapped back for it, and the people see that. People are not stupid.
You know? The majority of people are really not stupid. They see through the veil of of deceit, and that's really the the era that we're living in right now.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I believe Agenda 2030 represents a significant shift towards global control, building on the foundations of Agenda 21. It promotes a false narrative of sustainability while pushing for deindustrialization and population management. Public-private partnerships are manipulating governance for profit, sidelining genuine debate. Local implementations threaten personal freedoms, with corporations benefiting from increased government power. However, I see hope in grassroots action—engaging with local governance, supporting community initiatives, and standing firm against oppressive measures. We must act now to reclaim our freedoms.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨AGENDA 2030: THE SIEGE ACCELERATES—INVENTORY YOUR FREEDOM, BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE Agenda 21 was the blueprint. Agenda 2030 is the lockdown. Born in 1992 as "sustainable development," it's morphed into the UN's master plan for global uniformity: Recycle? Sure. But also ration your land, water, energy, food, movement—and your dissent. THREAD #Agenda2030
Video Transcript AI Summary
"This is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 nations. It's called the agenda for the twenty first century." "It's a totalitarian state being developed right now all over the world." "The three pillars of United Nations Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, the three e's." "Social equity is about impoverishing huge portions of the population and bringing down the nations." "Everything that we're looking at now is destined to collapse our economies." "The mainstream media is owned by five major corporations and you're not going to get this information from the mainstream press." "You need to be your own press."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 nations. It's called the agenda for the twenty first century. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world. It is the inventory and control plan. Inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world.
This is a plan that was agreed to by 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the Agenda for the twenty first Century. So many of us around the world think that sustainable development just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone?
And the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all Because when systems don't meet, when they're when they're out of balance or not in sync with one another, they can't be controlled centrally. And the goal of Agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit.
Every nation that signed on to agenda 21 has its, its local agenda 21 plan. People in The United States are completely unaware of this. If I go out and talk about this, The United States press will attacks me and calls me which is is totally ridiculous. It is a but it's not a theory. It's a fact.
The three pillars of United Nations Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, the three e's. And everyone sort of thinks that they know what that means, the idea of social equity. It must mean that, well, everyone's going to have access to clean water and clean air, and no one's property is going to be used as a dumping ground because they are at a poverty level. But really what social equity is about is about impoverishing huge portions of the population and bringing down the nations. Everything that we're looking at now is destined to collapse our economies.
It's a totalitarian state being developed right now all over the world. And what major corporations want in this development is to be able to, to have move full movement of of of workers without borders or boundaries, to be able to move their goods through without regulations, and to reduce wages. And so this is the goal. So this is what you find with social equity. And of course, economy and ecology is about these are the three circles: economy, ecology and social equity.
And where they meet in the center is balance. But that is communitarian balance. So it's not balance of well-being of the people. What it is, is it's a balance for corporations so that they can exploit and control and have populations in an area in tightly packed dense areas so that they can be surveilled and managed. And this is what that balance looks like as far as the development of totalitarian state is.
The mainstream media is owned by five major corporations and you're not going to get this information from the mainstream press. So you need to be your own press. You need to educate yourself. You need to get out there and educate your neighbors, your community, your real community. You need to help your children understand that they're being indoctrinated from pre kindergarten to post graduate school.
All of us have a responsibility to ourselves and to others. This is true community, to work for personal freedom and always remember that even though we work as a group, if we do work as a group, we're all individuals in those groups, and we answer only to ourselves. And this is essential. It's essential as as free human beings. This is what we are.
We are free, and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight, and then make our friends and our neighbors and our community aware as well, and work together.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
The "Three E's"—Economy, Environment, Social Equity—sell the dream: Clean air for all, development without borders. But it's a trojan horse. Deindustrialize the West. "Raise up" the global South by gutting our resources. Pack the masses into smart-city hives, gut the countryside. Uniformity isn't progress—it's chains. Because scattered people are free. Concentrated ones are trackable. (At 1:00 in the vid)
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Public-private "partnerships" are the velvet glove. Mega-corps cozy up to govs, using taxpayer muscle to lock in markets and profits. "Consensus" isn't debate—it's engineered surrender. Bypass hearings, fast-track policies, seal the deal. Media giants (handful of owners) won't touch it. Be your own press. Educate. Awaken. From pre-K indoctrination to uni echo chambers, they're grooming compliance. (At 1:02)
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Local Agenda 2030? Every nation has one. U.S. officials call it "nonsense"—until zoning "protects" nothing, while "sustainability" clears your backyard. It's population management: Log your harvest, license your home, meter your move. No farmers? No food. No food? No freedom. Ration the fields, ration your voice. Corporations cheer—gov power guarantees their feast. (At 1:04)
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
The essence? Single world governance. Pervasive control at every level. But light pierces dark. We're free people—act like it. Engage local gov. Vote your conscience. Build parallel: Supply chains, schools, media. Defend cash. Reject Digital ID leashes. Back farmers, councils, neighbors. Work together. Change starts in the voting booth—alone, but unbreakable. (At 1:04)
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Agenda 2030 isn't the future—it's here. The darker it gets, the brighter we burn. Grace breaks chains. Faith over fear. Truth over deceit. Stand up. Speak bold. Pray hard. Act now. Full vid breakdown: Bookmark if awakening—reply your fight! Tag @JimFergusonUK @MarkFriesen08
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I noticed a sign at Nando’s UK limiting Coca-Cola Classic to one glass per customer due to new government laws. It feels absurd that adults are being told how much soda they can have. This seems like a slippery slope toward a society where our choices are policed. Who asked for this?
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
NEW:🚨 CONTROL CREEP Spotted in Nando’s UK: “Based on new government laws, we’ve had to limit Coca-Cola Classic to one glass per customer.” Grown adults being told how much fizz they’re “allowed.” Today it’s refills. Tomorrow your Digital ID ticks down a sugar quota. Policy writes the rules → businesses enforce them → tech will police them. Who asked for this? When did we start treating citizens like children? Share if you refuse a quota society. NO to Digital ID
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I shared alarming news about Pfizer's actions, suggesting they injected the world with a process containing cancer-causing sequences while concealing data from the FDA. I highlighted a significant investment in cancer companies, raising concerns that Pfizer may have knowingly contributed to a health crisis. This situation implies that billions could be at risk, and it seems Big Pharma profits from the diseases it creates. I believe the truth about this cover-up is beginning to unravel, and soon, more people will be aware of these issues.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 BIG PHARMA BOMBSHELL 🚨 “This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population.” Pfizer pulled a bait-and-switch: 💉 Injected the world with “Process 2” containing SV40 cancer-causing sequences. 💉 Hid the data from the FDA. 💉 Then went shopping for cancer companies — dropping $43 BILLION on Seagen. Genomics expert Kevin McKernan: 👉 “This has gone absolutely off the rails.” 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ Pfizer may have knowingly seeded cancer. ⚠️ Billions now stand exposed to a slow-motion health catastrophe. ⚠️ Big Pharma PROFITS from the very diseases it creates. 🔥 Trump will soon know. The world will soon know. 🚨 THE COVER-UP IS COLLAPSING 🚨
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues that after trials the vaccine process was changed and a “bait and switch” occurred, stating the EMA asked for another 250-person trial and that data was never delivered, making trial data seem irrelevant to real-world outcomes. They claim Pfizer quickly acquired cancer companies—$43B into C Gen and $2.26B into Trillium Therapeutics—because Trillium focused on blood cancers with a CD one forty seven marker on them, implying beneficiaries from the situation. They assert the Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as tested, calling it a fraud and noting efficacy numbers decay. They report significant DNA contamination found in 10 of 11 studies, with five peer-reviewed studies confirming contamination. They mention rising cancer rates and several papers reporting cancer post-vaccination, including neoplasms at the injection site, labeling this as a liability-free, often mandated issue, potentially the largest carcinogenic hit to the population, including children and pregnant women.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not conspiracy theory. This has been published in the BMJ by Retzaf Levy, and they go through this process one where they where they ran these vaccines in the trial and how they changed that when they decided to go and inject the rest of the world. This is traditionally a mortal sin in vaccine manufacturing or in any sort of biologic manufacturing. The process is the product. You change the process, you have to go through trials again.
And the EMA even asked them to do that, although they failed to. They asked for another trial of 250 people once they changed the process and that data was never delivered. So this bait and switch is very important for you to understand why the trial data is of absolute zero consequence to what we're actually seeing in the field. Those numbers are a caricature of what they're actually doing with these injections. They know something.
Pfizer very early on, they had the data on this from their trial. They knew this was gonna happen and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and they put $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium was focused on blood cancers that have a c d one forty seven marker on them. Okay?
That is one of the markers that is known to be involved in COVID. So they have a very interesting window on those malignancies and they're buying up the cancer companies that are probably gonna play the biggest role in benefiting from the mess that they've created. So in summary, the Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials. This is a big bait and switch and it's a fraud. So you can't believe anything they're saying about the vaccine efficiency, which we have seen even those numbers decay over time.
This is probably why. They're not really what they trialed. They gave you something different. There is significant d DNA contamination that's found. Like, 10 out of 11 studies have found this, and the ones that haven't found it have some financial conflicts.
So I think the consensus is out. 10 out of 10 out of 10 of the real studies are finding this. Several are through peer review, which have not been easy to get through peer review. The peer review journals do not like these papers. They get they get beat beat around in peer review for months to years, but they're they're making their way out now.
There is also significant DNA contamination now found in five peer reviewed studies that were not looking at this. They were looking at people's blood and tissue, and it was accidentally in there. Other people had to go sleuth it out. We've got cancer on the rise, and there's several papers that report cancer post vaccination. Like like, right at right at the site of injection, they'll see neoplasms.
Alright? There is there's something going on here. This can't be ignored saying it's a coincidence anymore. Now this is these are liability free and they're often mandated. Okay?
This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population. And we have these on childhood schedules. We're giving these to pregnant women. This has gone absolutely off the rails.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Elon Musk has significantly impacted the UK political scene by endorsing Advance UK, declaring it the only viable force for change and criticizing Nigel Farage as ineffective. This endorsement suggests a shift in momentum towards Advance UK, which aims to secure borders, restore free speech, and protect British sovereignty. The call to action emphasizes unity among the people to reclaim the nation, marking a pivotal moment in the fight for sovereignty. The message is clear: the time for change is now, and Advance UK is positioned to lead that charge.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE IN BRITAIN 🚨 Elon Musk has spoken. The world’s richest man — with 224.8M followers — has just shattered the UK political landscape: 🔥 “Advance UK will actually drive change. Farage is weak sauce who will do nothing.” Musk’s words are more than commentary. They are a judgment — a thunderclap that exposes the hollow shell of controlled opposition and crowns a new force: Advance UK. 💥 For months, Musk has been in direct contact with Ben Habib. 💥 He now declares Farage unfit and Advance UK the only path to protect Britain. 💥 The global spotlight is on London. The establishment is trembling. 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ Reform UK’s mask is slipping — the “fox” is finished. ⚠️ Advance UK rises with momentum and legitimacy no other new party has achieved. ⚠️ The lions of Britain now have a roar heard across the Atlantic. This is no longer about whether Britain will change. It is about who will lead that change. 👉 Share this. Stand with Advance UK. The fight for sovereignty has entered a new phase. @_AdvanceUK @Advanceuk_wales @benhabib6 @elonmusk
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
📢 WHAT ADVANCE UK STANDS FOR: ⚔️ Secure our borders & end mass illegal migration ⚔️ Restore free speech & dismantle censorship laws ⚔️ Protect Britain’s sovereignty from globalist overreach ⚔️ Put defence, health & education back in the people’s hands This isn’t “reform.” This is restoration. And with @elonmusk backing the lions, Britain has a fighting chance.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🔥 History is calling. @elonmusk has spoken. The world is watching. Now it’s time for Britain’s lions to rise, unite, and take back our nation. 👉 Stand with Advance UK. 👉 Stand for sovereignty. 👉 Stand for the people. The tide has turned. The roar has begun.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the situation in the UK, as even Fox News is highlighting the authoritarian tactics of Keir Starmer’s government. They describe a troubling environment where free speech is stifled, critics are monitored, and democracy feels threatened. The world is observing this descent into censorship, with citizens facing repercussions for opposing views on issues like mass migration. If American media can recognize this crisis, I wonder why our leaders remain silent. It’s crucial that we wake up, stand up, and voice our concerns before dissent becomes a crime.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 EVEN FOX NEWS IS CALLING OUT THE UK’S DESCENT INTO TYRANNY 🚨 You know things are BAD in Britain when American media is sounding the alarm. 🔴 Fox News just ran a full segment exposing the 1984-style tactics of Keir Starmer’s regime: 🗣️ “Free speech is being crushed.” 🗣️ “Critics are being surveilled.” 🗣️ “This isn’t democracy — it’s authoritarianism with a British accent.” 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ The world is watching Starmer’s government spiral into censorship and control. ⚠️ UK citizens are being treated like thought criminals for opposing mass migration or speaking the truth. ⚠️ Even across the Atlantic, they can see it: Britain is no longer free. 💥 If Fox News can see it, why can’t our own leaders? 🇬🇧 It’s time to wake up. Stand up. And speak up — before it's illegal to even whisper dissent.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The UK has created the National Internet Intelligence Investigations Team to monitor anti-migrant social media posts, purportedly to detect unrest. Critics argue this is a crackdown on free speech, citing instances of individuals receiving lengthy prison sentences for online activity. One example given is a woman imprisoned for 31 months for a tweet, longer than a child rapist's sentence.
The EU's Digital Services Act and similar efforts in Canada, Brazil, and Ireland are also mentioned as part of a broader strategy to pressure social media companies into censoring content globally. These measures are seen as targeting populist movements critical of mass migration. Concerns are raised about Americans facing potential arrest in Europe for expressing controversial opinions online. Trump has imposed tariffs on Brazil because of their censorship. The goal, it's claimed, is to instill fear and self-censorship, mirroring the dystopian world of George Orwell's 1984.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1984, called and he wants its truth ministry of truth back, The UK has created an elite police unit known as the National Internet Intelligence Investigations Team dedicated to monitoring anti migrant social media posts. Leaders claim its purpose is to detect early signs of potential unrest.
Speaker 1: Unrest like this protest and counter protest had erupted after a 38 year old asylum seeking migrant was charged with sexual assault for attempting to kiss a 14 year old girl.
Speaker 0: Despite the surveillance, UK's prime minister insists he still believes in free speech.
Speaker 2: We've had free speech for a very, very long time here. So we're very proud about that. We're protected. Well,
Speaker 1: with us now to react is public news founder Michael Schellenberger. Michael, it is true that The United Kingdom and the West has a fairly robust tradition, long standing when it comes to free speech, but I'm not so sure that's true anymore. I mean, there's story after story about people being thrown behind bars in The UK even for tweets that they have deleted with longer prison sentences than people who've committed actual physical violent crimes.
Speaker 2: Yeah. That's right, Guy. Thanks for having me on. Yeah. I mean, it's incredible story.
I mean, there's a woman that's in prison for thirty one months, which is four months longer than a child rapist is in prison. And what all she was she did was have a tweet up for four hours that she ended up taking down. This is a sweeping crackdown on free speech in Great Britain that we have not seen anything like in maybe hundreds of years. I mean, it's really astonishing. It's happening on multiple levels.
Keep in mind, they were already arresting 30 people a day for wrong speech in Britain before this. Now they have a special police task force to constantly monitor social media including, x, formerly Twitter, and they can stop content based on age verification. So they can stop content saying, oh, this is harmful to mental health. And then x recently, just a few days ago, did block content on the basis of the British order to be able to identify if people were old enough to see it. So the other thing you mentioned there was the Islamophobia.
They're they're not gonna allow people to criticize mass migration. They're gonna call it Islamophobia and a hate crime and prevent it. So this is George Orwell I mean, George Orwell perfectly predicted this in 1984 when he wrote his book in the mid forties.
Speaker 0: You know, Michael, I was just in Europe at a conference and talking to a number of the people there. I mean, they are married to this idea that you have to monitor the Internet, that you shouldn't be able to say certain basic things, including posting memes or things that are counter to what they believe politically in terms of the political party that's in charge. It's not just The UK. It's also the EU. They have this new digital services act, which is complicated trade between The United States and the European Union.
And even the deal that the president just got, it's an un you know, it's an issue that has not been satisfied according to the administration. So I don't see this going in a direction that's gonna get better despite the pressure. I mean, the The UK and the EU are really dedicated to this idea of putting people in prison for saying the wrong thing or thinking the wrong thing.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Absolutely. It's it's Europe's crackdown is maybe the worst in the world, but, I mean, it's happening everywhere, and it's actually, unfortunately, accelerated since Trump was elected. So it's the EU. It's Britain.
It's Ireland wants to read your social me your social your private text messages. Canada, Brazil, the strategy here is to make it so that the social media companies, will basically censor this content for everybody. So I think a lot of Americans go, I don't really care what happens in some other country, Britain or Europe. They should care because this is a strategy to basically encircle The United States and then have these social media companies pressure. They just delete censor this content for everybody.
It's coming at a time when it's always it's overly political. The the populist parties in Europe, just like Trump and the MAGA Republicans in The United States, are focused on mass migration. So they wanna censor that content because it's been so politically powerful for these opposition leaders, including Germany, France, Romania. They're basically trying to prevent the opposition from competing at all both through censorship and just keeping them off the ballot. I will just say one positive thing is that Trump today, yesterday, he called out the prime minister of Britain.
Today, he's imposed serious tariffs on Brazil because of their censorship and because of their lawfare in preventing a presidential front runner, the last president Bolsonaro, from competing in next year's elections.
Speaker 0: Well, and also, just to add to that, I mean, Americans now have to worry about traveling to Europe and saying the wrong thing or posting the wrong thing or have posted the wrong thing many years ago. Being in these so called western countries, they could face arrest by the Europeans or the Canadians.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. Yeah. Absolutely. I mean and that's how that's how they want that's how 1984 works is they want you to be afraid of what you're going to say. They want you to be afraid of saying something controversial and then not expressing it.
That's one of the most damaging things to free speech here. You have America was found that we have to be free to speak our minds. Europe has taken us in an absolutely terrifying and totalitarian direction.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Thanks. Thank god for the first amendment here.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Absolutely. Michael Schellenberg, Berger. Thank you very much.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’ve uncovered shocking evidence that George Soros’s team collaborated with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign to fabricate the Russia collusion narrative against Donald Trump. Newly released emails show they used CrowdStrike to manipulate cyber narratives, engaged intel insiders, and worked with media to distract from Clinton’s scandals. The FBI was aware of the authenticity of the DNC emails and the risks of Clinton’s private server but chose to cover it up, allowing the false narrative to fester. Now, I’m left wondering if anyone will be held accountable for this deception.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 BOMBSHELL: GEORGE SOROS TEAM, HILLARY CLINTON & THE RUSSIA COLLUSION SETUP EXPOSED 🚨 The truth is no longer hidden — it’s documented. 🧨 Newly released emails CONFIRM that George Soros’s operatives met directly with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign to help plant the now-debunked Russia collusion narrative against Donald Trump. 🔍 The operation included: Using CrowdStrike to shape cyber narratives Leveraging intel community insiders Coordinating with friendly media outlets to flood headlines and bury Hillary’s own scandals 💻 Meanwhile, the FBI KNEW the DNC emails were real. They knew Hillary's private server was a liability. They knew the evidence pointed elsewhere. 🛑 But they covered it up anyway. 🛑 They let the lie grow. 🛑 They let the nation burn in division — to protect their own. What started as a dirty campaign trick became a multi-year coup attempt. Now the question is no longer “Did they?” It’s “Will anyone be held accountable?”
Video Transcript AI Summary
In early 2016, two Open Society Foundations officials allegedly held confidential talks with the Clinton campaign and the DNC, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Their objective was to promote the Trump-Russia collusion narrative and distract from Hillary Clinton's email and Clinton Foundation scandals.
According to the transcript, Open Society executive Leonard Bernardo outlined a plan for strategic media manipulation using CrowdStrike, ThreatConnect, and Intel channels. CIA and FBI analysts reviewed the evidence and deemed the emails likely authentic. Despite this confirmation, the FBI allegedly did not follow through, allowing the trail to go cold. The speaker claims this was not a mistake but a cover-up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Two officials from George Soros' Open Society Foundations held confidential talks with the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Yes, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz in early twenty sixteen. Their objective, to promote the Trump Russia collusion narrative and distract from Hillary's growing email and Clinton Foundation scandals. Internal emails from open society executive Leonard Bernardo laid out the blueprint. Strategic media manipulation using CrowdStrike, ThreatConnect, and Intel channels.
CIA and FBI analysts reviewed the evidence. They didn't dismiss it. They called the emails likely authentic. But even with confirmation in hand, the FBI never followed through. They let the trail go cold because the truth led to the wrong people.
This wasn't a mistake. It was a cover up and they knew exactly what they were doing.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I just learned that Navy whistleblower Tom Schiller revealed that Chinese engineers had access to classified U.S. military systems via Microsoft Azure for over a decade. Bill Gates was confronted about this, and while Microsoft didn't deny it, they changed their policy quietly. This situation raises serious concerns about national security and American sovereignty, with implications of espionage. I'm questioning who approved this access and why Microsoft hasn't faced consequences. It's crucial to expose this and protect our Republic.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 BOMBSHELL: MICROSOFT GAVE CCP ACCESS TO U.S. MILITARY SECRETS 🚨 🔴 Navy whistleblower Tom Schiller just dropped a national security nuke: 🗣️ Chinese engineers were granted access to classified U.S. military systems through Microsoft Azure — for over a decade. 🔴 Loomer and Charles confronted Bill Gates on camera — demanding answers. Microsoft didn’t deny it. They just quietly changed the policy. 🔥 This isn’t a leak. This is treason by tech infrastructure. 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ The CCP had their hands in the heart of U.S. defense systems. ⚠️ Gates’ empire sold out American sovereignty for profit and global positioning. ⚠️ And the Pentagon is only now reviewing the fallout. 💥 Who approved this? 💥 Why hasn’t Microsoft been raided? 🚨 THIS IS ESPIONAGE — AND SOMEONE NEEDS TO GO TO JAIL. 🚨 🛡️ Join http://FreedomTrainInternational.org — Expose the traitors, protect the Republic, and prepare for what’s coming. 💪 Don’t be scared. Be prepared.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Gates was asked to condemn Microsoft's Azure program for allegedly leaking sensitive classified information to the CCP. He was also asked if he is pro-CCP. The speaker referenced the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's financial connections to the CCP and its ownership of Microsoft shares. Gates was asked again to condemn Microsoft's government Azure program for leaking classified information from the US military. Gates did not respond.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gates, would you like to condemn Microsoft Azure program for leaking sensitive classified information to the CCP? And then are they Are you pro CCP, mister Gates? I understand your foundation owns a lot of Microsoft shares now, and your Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has heavily financed and is financially connected to the CCP. So is that why you're not answering the questions about governments, Microsoft's Azure program, mister Gates? Are you sure you don't wanna condemn them for leaking classified information from our US military?
One more time, mister Gates. Would you like to condemn Microsoft's government Azure program for leaking classified information at a CCP? No? Okay.
New landing page – Inspiration Station
freedomtraininternational.org
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Portugal is set to pilot the European Vaccination Card in September, joining Latvia, Greece, Belgium, and Germany. This initiative, part of the EUVABECO project, aims to consolidate vaccination data in one accessible location, available in printed and digital formats. As Europe shifts from emergency measures to long-term COVID-19 management, the card is seen as a crucial step towards enhancing resilience against future health threats. It emphasizes a citizen-centered approach to data management, moving away from reliance on public health systems.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Portugal to pilot “European Vaccination Card” from September “Crucial step towards more resilient and health-secure future” – or “really chilling”? Portugal is to join four other European countries in piloting a European Vaccination Card from September. According to http://Vaccinestoday.eu, the card “aims to empower individuals by consolidating all their vaccination data in one easily accessible location”. It is the brainchild of the EUVABECO project, of which Portugal is a partner alongside Sweden, France, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Latvia, Luxembourg and Poland. But, for the purposes of the pilot, only Latvia, Greece, Belgium, Germany and Portugal are involved. Introducing the reasons for the project, Vaccines today says: “As Europe transitions from emergency measures to long-term COVID-19 management, there is a critical opportunity to strengthen resilience and increase preparedness for future health threats”. Thus, the European Vaccination Card (EVC), aims to “empower individuals by consolidating all their vaccination data in one easily accessible location. It will be available in various formats, including printed cards, mailed copies, and digital versions for smartphones. The EVC will revolutionise vaccination management and ensure a healthier future for all Europeans, says the article. “This citizen-centred method of storing and sharing data, rather than relying solely on public health systems, was made possible by the Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN). #WEF2030Agenda #VaccinePassport https://www.portugalresident.com/portugal-to-pilot-european-vaccination-card-from-september/
VaccinesToday
We are an online platform for discussing vaccines and vaccination.
vaccinestoday.eu
Portugal to pilot “European Vaccination Card” from September
Portugal to pilot “European Vaccination Card” from September; “Crucial step towards more health-secure future” - or “really chilling”?
portugalresident.com
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m sharing a warning from Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Pfizer VP, who claims that wealthy elites are orchestrating global crises to strip away our freedoms. He highlights the Club of Rome's plan to create manufactured threats like pandemics and climate emergencies, suggesting these are tactics to establish a one world government. Yeadon argues that the same forces behind lockdowns and vaccinations are now promoting climate panic. He urges vigilance and preparation for potential future threats, emphasizing the need to protect our families.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 DR. MIKE YEADON: “THEY WANT TO KILL US — AND THEY’LL DO IT AGAIN” 🚨 🔴 Former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon issues a chilling warning: 🗣️ “Very wealthy people… have plans to take over the world and remove the freedoms of ordinary people like us that they regard as useless eaters.” 🔴 He exposes the Club of Rome plan to create global crises — pandemics and climate emergencies — to force nations to surrender sovereignty to a one world government. 🔥 “Covid. Net Zero. Global boiling. These are fabricated threats from the same people — and they’ll use them again.” 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ The same elites behind the lockdowns and forced injections are now pushing climate panic and carbon control. ⚠️ These aren’t random crises — they’re engineered to enslave you. ⚠️ And the final step? Another round of deadly injections. 💥 Still think this ends with safety? 💥 Or are we walking straight into manufactured catastrophe? 🚨 THIS ISN’T A THEORY. IT’S A BLUEPRINT FOR TYRANNY. 🚨 🛡️ Join http://FreedomTrainInternational.org — Learn the truth, protect your family, and prepare before they strike again. 💪 Don’t be scared. Be prepared.
New landing page – Inspiration Station
freedomtraininternational.org
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I shared a startling claim from a Yale study suggesting a 37% reduction in lifespan for vaccinated individuals. Dr. Joseph Sansone's revelation raises serious concerns about the long-term effects of the vaccine, which many trusted without sufficient long-term data. If accurate, this could represent a significant betrayal of public trust, warranting investigation into the institutions that promoted vaccination. The lack of media coverage and accountability is troubling, and it's crucial that we advocate for those who feel unheard.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
https://t.co/Ni2AJGIvvs 🚨 “That awkward silence right now…” 🚨 🧬 A Yale study reportedly found a 37% reduction in lifespan for the vaccinated. Let that sink in. Dr. Joseph Sansone dropped a bombshell—and the silence from health authorities is deafening. 📉 37% shorter life. 💉 Tied to the jab. ⏳ And millions took it—trusting the science that never asked long-term questions. 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ If true, this would be one of the greatest health betrayals in modern history. ⚠️ Every institution that pushed this must be investigated. ⚠️ Silence now = complicity. 💥 Where’s the media? 💥 Where’s the outrage? 💥 Where’s the accountability? We must speak for the silenced.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
x.com/i/article/1945…
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m witnessing a historic moment as a court case in the Netherlands names high-profile figures like Gates and Schwab, accusing them of serious crimes against humanity. Despite a media blackout, the fight for freedom continues, highlighted by the arrest of lead lawyer Arno van Kessel. I’ve been actively involved in uniting Irish patriots to address the chaos from unchecked immigration. This movement is gaining momentum across Europe, and I’m committed to building coalitions that prioritize sovereignty and cultural identity. Together, we will reclaim our nations and restore the truth.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 BREAKING: UNITED AGAINST THE GLOBALIST ASSAULT 🚨 🔎 COURTROOMS. BORDERS. BACKROOMS. HISTORY IS BEING MADE. 🗣 “They blindfolded the lawyer. Locked him in max security. No charges. Just silence.” 🔥 The fight for freedom is now global — and the world is watching. 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠ A historic court case in the Netherlands has named Gates, Bourla, Schwab & others. ⚠ Charges: Genocide. Psychological warfare. Crimes against humanity. ⚠ Media blackout. No cameras. No outrage. Just silence. WHY? Over the past few weeks, I’ve been everywhere — from the Leeuwarden courthouse in the Netherlands to historic political meetings in Ireland. It was 4 weeks ago when lead lawyer Arno van Kessel — who brought this explosive case forward — was arrested, blindfolded, and thrown into max security. No charges. No trial. Just gone. They thought that would stop the case. It didn’t. The court papers were delivered. I sat in the courtroom. I watched the accusations unfold. 💣 The names listed? Bill Gates. Albert Bourla. Klaus Schwab. Global media figures. Politicians. Accused of deploying biological weapons, engineering mass deception, and waging psychological war against the people. 🧨 This is Nuremberg-level territory. And while most of the accused sent legal teams to observe and react… Gates didn’t even show up. No lawyers. No defence. Maybe he thinks this will just disappear. It won’t. ⚖ Judgement is coming within 6 weeks. And this could set a precedent for similar trials across the world. 🇮🇪 Meanwhile, in Ireland — I was honoured to be invited to chair a historic unity meeting with political leaders from across the island. Irish patriots coming together. Building a new nationalist partnership. Forging unity. Because unity is strength. They asked me to facilitate — not because I’m Irish, but because I’m a neutral Highlander, with deep respect for Celtic heritage. I’ve committed to chair ongoing talks until a unified Irish nationalist coalition is formed. This wasn’t just a meeting. It was a moment in history. A new wave is rising. 🛑 Why? Because Ireland is being overrun. 🔻 Native population: ~3 million 🔺 Illegal influx: Up to 3 million more — overwhelmingly young men No vetting. No background checks. No integration. Just communities drowning in chaos and fear. The media says “asylum seekers.” But these are military-age males, dumping passports, vanishing into small towns, and straining every service. It’s not just Ireland. France. Germany. Sweden. UK. It’s everywhere. A coordinated collapse of borders. A silent erasure of national identity. But in America? The border is finally being locked down. Why not Europe? 💥 Because they don’t want it sealed. They want us broken. Divided. Replaced. But we will not be. 🌍 I’ve spoken in Romania. 🇭🇺 I’ve stood in Budapest. 🇫🇷 I met with Marine Le Pen in France. 🇳🇱 I’ve reported from inside Dutch courtrooms. 🇮🇪 And now I help unify Irish patriots. And I’ve joined Advance UK — a rising political party in Britain led by Ben Habib — to fight this crisis head-on in the UK. We must build coalitions across Europe. Not under Brussels, but among free, sovereign nations who love their culture, faith, and families. 💬 As Ben said: “We face an existential threat to Western civilisation.” And he’s right. 🙏 To the millions of you supporting this movement, thank you. Your shares, your messages, your donations — they keep the engine burning. This fight is global, and your voice makes it louder. 🌍 Join the movement at: http://freedomtraininternational.org 💥 This is the largest, fastest-growing freedom movement in the world. 🎯 We are over the target. 📢 We are the counter-narrative. 🇮🇪🇬🇧🇺🇸🇫🇷🇳🇱🇨🇦🇳🇿 Together, we will reclaim our nations. Together, we will restore the truth. UNITY IS STRENGTH. SOVEREIGNTY IS NON-NEGOTIABLE. THE TIME IS NOW. — Jim Ferguson Freedom Train International @HeneyRaymond @MalachySteenson @BligheDerek @LeahyMaleahyml
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jim Ferguson reports from Ireland after visiting the Netherlands, where he observed a court case against Bill Gates, the CEO of Pfizer, Klaus Schwab, and others. The charges include crimes against humanity, genocide, biological weapons, and mass deception. He notes that Bill Gates did not send a legal team. A judgment is expected in six weeks.
Ferguson is in Ireland to chair meetings aimed at unifying Irish patriots concerned about the country's situation. He claims Ireland's indigenous population of 3 million has increased by 2-3 million in the last four years due to an influx of young, male, illegal migrants. He says the Irish government is complicit.
Ferguson also mentions his involvement with Advance UK, a political party focused on the dangers of mass illegal immigration. He emphasizes the need for unity among patriots across Europe to protect Western civilization. He mentions meeting Catherine Austin Fitts, who is also named as a professional witness in the Netherlands court case. He thanks his supporters and promotes Freedom Train International.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, good morning. This is Jim Ferguson and I'm still here in Ireland. It's been an incredibly busy few days and, those of you that have been paying attention and know where I've been, I've been over in, The Netherlands. I was visiting the Lusvarden Court House and following the court case that was brought by the lead lawyer, Arlo van Kessel, who was interestingly arrested four weeks ago by armed specialised police. They arrested him blindfolded and put him in cuffs and detained him and took him to a maximum security prison in The Netherlands.
And there's a lot of speculation at this point, because he's there without charges. He's he's been detained without charge. And a lot of people are thinking, and I'm I'm one of them, that this was maybe an attempt by the globalist orders and those involved who have been named in this court case to stop the court case from actually going ahead. But they failed because the court papers were able to be delivered to the judge and to the court. So I sat in on that.
I had access into the court to witness and to observe, and what was remarkable about this court case is the charges that have been levelled against very well known people famous people or infamous people depending on your point of view. Bill Gates, the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Buhler, Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum, and others, including journalists, two journalists who are accused of collaborating with the globalist orders to sell the narrative that they wanted to be sold. The charges are crimes against humanity, genocide, biological weapons, and mass deception psychological operations. It is akin to the kind of accusations that were made during the Nuremberg Trials, and I've said it before this could lead to something very, very powerful and significant. Indeed over the last few days I've had a lot of contacts from people in other countries who are interested in bringing these similar types charges in their own countries against those individuals and others.
I watched the evidence being presented and of course these individuals with the exception of Bill Gates had lawyers there to hear and to try to counter what was being said. But it was very interesting that Bill Gates didn't send a legal team to defend what was being said. Maybe he thinks that it will go away. I don't think it's going to go away, and there is going to be a judgment made in the next six weeks as to what happens next. But the levels of interest in this court case in Lisfarden in The Netherlands is on a whole other level and it has very serious implications for those people involved, especially if the judge was to make a ruling where they might even be brought in or asked to attend the court in person to give evidence, to be put on the witness stand.
Can you imagine? Now the lying mainstream media are not covering this. I wonder why. Maybe the big fat checks that Bill Gates gives them is motivation not to talk about what's actually going on there. But it is out there and I'm covering it extensively and I'm going to be going back at some point to The Netherlands, to that courthouse, to give them far more in-depth coverage as to what's actually going on and what the ramifications may very well be.
I have friends who are lawyers in The Netherlands, Mika Terhorst, for example, who's I've known her for many years. She's a great lady and a great lawyer, and I was actually sitting beside her when this was all happening. So I also want to give you an update on the reasons I'm here in Ireland. I alluded it to it yesterday. I was invited to come here by people I know in the political realms, and the reason they asked me is because I'm not Irish, and I know that might be sounding a bit strange, but they wanted somebody that was kind of neutral in all of this.
I am a Scottish Highlander, and there is a close Celtic connection between the Scottish people and the Irish people, and there are other nations like the Welsh, of course, well that are part of that Celtic heritage. But I came to help facilitate and to chair what I can only describe as probably been quite a historic meeting. There was a group came together, I chaired it, there was an agenda, we went through it. And you never really know in advance how these things are going to play out because they're very strong patriots, they love their country, some of them have different views or ideas about different things. But the important thing in all of this is unity, and that's why I came to Ireland on this occasion.
It was to bring the Irish, that love their countries and want to do something positive together. And I have no affiliation to any other particular groups or movements in Ireland. I know a lot of them and have interactions with them, but I'm a neutral player and that was why I was asked to come here. So I'm going to be cheering the next few meetings over the course of the next few weeks and months. We're going to be building a unity coalition of the willing and those, and there's a lot of great patriots here in Ireland that really do love their country, and they're very worried about what's actually starting to happen and has been happening over the last few years.
It's worth bearing in mind that the Irish situation is on a whole other level, and that's why I talk about it so much, because I care deeply about them. You know, we have similar music, history, culture, traditions, language. And what's happening in Ireland is their communities are being completely devastated and overrun. And this is really important that people, especially in The United States, realise those of you who are from Irish descent for example. The situation in Ireland is on a whole other level and it's being caused by this incredible influx, this mass illegal immigration that's been taking place.
To put it in context, the Irish population, the indigenous population is only about 3,000,000. Over the last four years we've seen that increase by a further 2,000,000, some would even estimate an additional 3,000,000. And these people that are coming in are not women and children. It's not asylum seekers. It's not people fleeing a war torn country.
But it's being portrayed as that, but it's not that. The people who are coming in and flooding into Ireland are young, male, illegal migrant men, aged between 19 and 30. Somalia, Syria, many, many other nations like that. They come, they get rid of their papers, their passports, their identities, so they cannot be checked and vetted. They are being housed in hotels in practically every community here in Ireland now, and we're talking about multiple, multiple thousands of people in small Irish communities.
They're being completely overwhelmed. And the Irish government, well, they are quite complicit in all of this. The question is why? But it's not just in Ireland. This is happening in France, Sweden, Norway.
It's happening across the entire West. Western civilization is seeing this happening to it. And up until recently, The United States was in a similar position, with millions of illegal migrants flooding across the Southern US border. That's now been stopped. ICE, federal authorities in The United States are taking that to task and they are removing people en masse.
It's a tough job because there's so many of them, but at least they've stopped it. The military are in there, and their border patrols are in there, and they are making a huge effort to to and and I think the border has effectively been sealed, which is fantastic. But not in Europe, and it's incredibly important that we unify as patriots, as those that that that love freedom and freedom of speech and want our own culture and religion and history and identity protected and preserved. But that may well be something that is going to disappear, and and I those of you that that know will know that I've also joined Advance UK, which is a brand new political party in The United Kingdom led by Ben Habib. Ben Habib is the leader.
He's a former member of the European Parliament. He and I worked together in the Brexit party, and he's a very successful London businessman. He is a patriot that loves The United Kingdom, and he knows the dangers of mass illegal immigration that's out of control now. So there's a lot going on. You'll know that I've been in Romania, I've been in Hungary, Budapest, I've been previously in Cork, I had a march there a few weeks ago.
I was in Paris, France, I met Marine Le Pen, talked to her. Been in The Netherlands, I mean this last trip to The Netherlands at the court case, I'd only been there, you know, about two or three weeks before that doing other work. So I'm all over the place right now and I'm extremely busy, but I want to say that this is necessary, and what makes it worthwhile are all of you. I can't thank you enough for the messages of support that's coming in internationally all around the world and across Europe, Australia, New Zealand, America, Canada, The UK, everybody that that watches this knows that we are in the fight of our lives. Benebib said that we face an existential threat to Western civilization, And he's absolutely right.
We do. The question is why are they flooding our countries with all these people, destabilizing everything? We're seeing attacks on women and children on a whole other level. It should never be like that. The first order of any government is to protect their own people, and we're being sold out.
But we're rising, and we're coming together, and this is why I came to Ireland, to unite the Irish patriots, to to bring them together, to use whatever skills and abilities and talents that I have to to help unite and and to get that focus on the things that unite us, not the things that divide us. And that's a model I've been using across Europe as well when I've spoken to the patriots in France and Romania and all these other nations. We have old historic divisions sometimes and wounds. We will never forget our history, but the time to unite is now because we face such a serious set of issues and problems, not just in one particular country, but actually right across Western civilisation. We need strong leadership.
We need people that will unify the nations and bring and unite Europe and The UK. I don't mean becoming part of Europe again. We did Brexit, it wasn't done properly, but the point is we love our friends in Germany and France and all the other European nations. It's incredibly important that we understand the necessity to come together and to form new alliances and to support existing alliances to enhance them. And the meeting that I chaired yesterday this weekend in Ireland, I would say is almost historic.
There was a group of people came, political parties, movements, groups coming together, and that's just the very first of what's going to be going on further in a series of other meetings which I've agreed to chair and help to facilitate. And I think that what I found yesterday was because you never really know when you're maybe meeting people for the first time or you're meeting people that you don't maybe necessarily have interacted with before. You don't know how it's going to go. Well, I can tell you, it was incredibly productive. There was a true meeting of minds from these wonderful Irish men and women who were there, who attended, and who were absolutely laser focused on tackling the big issues.
And what, as I say, once again, we might not always agree on everything. I mean, would be very unusual if we did. But here's the key. We agreed on the fundamental important parts of all of this. Unity is strength.
And I'm very proud to have been invited here to help facilitate that and to move it forward. And what's going to happen over the course of the next few weeks and months is that others will be brought into this, and I will help to build that coalition, that unity across Ireland. And then when my job is done, I'll hand it back over to them and then they can build it and turn it into whatever it is they want it to become. And then my job here will have been complete, but I will continue to support the Irish people for as long as I am around because at the end of the day, we have a close affinity and I love the Irish. But this same model, the same emphasis has to be done across Europe and The United Kingdom as well.
And there are other great nations that are facing the same issues, Canada being one of them, and up until recently The United States. But thankfully they got their borders sealed, because a nation that doesn't have borders ceases to be a nation. When Ben Habib talks about an existential threat to Western civilization, he's been absolutely true and accurate in what he's saying. So I'm going to be here for a little bit longer. I had met an amazing lady last night with a group of American friends, a former congressman called Catherine Austin Fitz, and I'm sure most of you will know who she is.
A remarkable lady. We went out, we had dinner, we talked about a lot of things, and of course she's got a deep knowledge and understanding of central bank digital currencies, digital ID, the economic situation. I mean, she's been in the previous American administration as well, going back, I think it was Bush, forgive me if I'm wrong in saying that, but a lady with huge integrity and huge capability. She had a really incredible mind, and, it was, really, really nice to to be able to sit down and and talk to her. And what's really interesting is that she is also named as a professional witness in this court case in Luz Varden in The Netherlands.
So I was able to talk to her at length about that, the charges that are being brought against, potentially against Bill Gates, Albert Broula, Claus Schwab and all the other individuals. And it was very interesting to discuss this court case with her. Well it's another beautiful day here and I don't know whether I brought the sunshine with me or whether I've just been lucky because everywhere I've gone over the last few weeks it's been glorious weather. But I will be heading back to The United Kingdom and doing other things there. But in the meantime, I just wanted to say a huge thank you to the millions of people out there who are following the work that I'm doing.
And the messages of support, you know, I do read them. There's been so many that I've been unable to reply to every single one of you, but I will get around to doing that. And I just want to say a huge thank you to all of the wonderful patriots out there internationally that are helping to get the messages out Every time you share and like and repost something, other people see it. And we're building that unity because it's a real counter to this globalist top down control narrative that they seem to be completely obsessed with. And the other thing they seem to be completely obsessed with is the year 02/1930.
And I'm going to talk to you a little bit more about that at some future point quite soon. But in the meantime, I just want to say have a great Sunday wherever you are in the world. Enjoy nature, enjoy your families, enjoy each other, enjoy watching this and thank you from the bottom of my heart for all the wonderful support. I will say to you get on to freedomtraininternational.org. Freedom Train International is the fastest growing and largest freedom movement in the world today, and there is a wealth of information on there.
And if you feel upon your heart to maybe send something to help the fight, fuel the furnace of the freedom train, or you can go on to our major page there and every little donation helps, know, because I'm all over the place There's obviously a cost to that. We're pretty much self funded, but nevertheless it all helps. If it's in your heart to do that, then I would certainly be very grateful. There's been some donations come in very recently. I'm really, really appreciative of that.
But in the meantime, enjoy yourselves, keep fighting for freedom, keep seeking the truth, and thank you for your support, thank you for the shares and the likes, because that is what motivates me to keep on going. When you guys are out there and I read those those messages and I hear those those kind of comments. I know I'm I'm on the target and not only on target I'm right over the target. So stay safe, look after yourselves, have a nice weekend and I'll be speaking to you probably shortly but I'll probably be back in London or somewhere in The United Kingdom at some future point and then I'll be getting back to the proper reporting as I normally do. When you're travelling, when you're interviewing, when you're out meeting people, sometimes you don't get to do as much on that side as I would like, but bear with me on that one.
I'll get back to you all shortly. And thank you once again for the interest that you are showing. There's millions of you out there now. Oh, and the other thing as well, there's been multiple thousands of new followers to the channel just within the last few days alone. I think maybe maybe five or 6,000 new followers, and I just am blown away by that.
So thank you. Welcome to the show. Welcome to the international family that is Jim Ferguson of Freedom Train International. I'm sure I'll get to know you all in due course. Thank you for subscribing also to the channel.
We've had a lot of new members coming in actually subscribing to this channel now as well, so thank you. I'll get to know you all very personally shortly in due course. Until next time though, this is Jim Ferguson, and we'll speak soon. Bye bye for now.
New landing page – Inspiration Station
freedomtraininternational.org
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨BREAKING: A NEW NATIONALIST DAWN IN IRELAND 🚨 🇮🇪 Unity is no longer a dream — it's happening. 🇮🇪 Today, I chaired a historic meeting in Ireland — uniting leaders from across the island in one room, with one purpose: To forge a new path forward rooted in sovereignty, strength, and national pride and create a credible political alternative. I was invited to facilitate this effort — not as an outsider, but as a brother in the fight for freedom — and I will continue to chair future meetings until a unified nationalist front is fully established. 🗣 No more division. No more silence. 📢 The Irish people — will decide their own destiny. 🌍 Globalist influence ends where Irish sovereignty begins. This is just the beginning. And it was an honour to stand among true patriots this weekend. 🔥 Unity is Strength @HeneyRaymond @MalachySteenson @BligheDerek @LeahyMaleahyml
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I attended a groundbreaking court case in Leeuwarden, Netherlands, where global elites were accused of serious crimes, including genocide and biological warfare. Notably, figures like Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab were named. The lead lawyer was detained before the trial, but the case proceeded with nearly 200 documents presented as evidence. This marks a significant moment since Nuremberg, and if the judge rules favorably, these individuals could be summoned to trial. I'm now in Ireland, preparing for the next steps in our movement for freedom and unity against globalist agendas. Join us in this fight for truth and justice.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 BREAKING: Nuremberg 2 Has Begun — And the Globalists Are TERRIFIED 🚨 🎤 Jim Ferguson reporting after attending the explosive court case in Leeuwarden, Netherlands. What I witnessed was unprecedented. 👨⚖ Inside the courtroom, global elites were named in a case involving: ▪ Crimes against humanity ▪ Genocide ▪ Biological warfare ▪ Collusion with the media Names like: 🔹 Bill Gates 🔹 Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO) 🔹 Mark Rutte (former Dutch PM, now NATO head) 🔹 Klaus Schwab (World Economic Forum) The lead lawyer, Arno van Kessel, was blindfolded, handcuffed, and thrown in a maximum-security prison without charge — days before the case. They tried to stop it. They failed. 📄 Nearly 200 documents were entered into evidence. The courtroom heard it all. This is the first judicial case of its kind since Nuremberg. If the judge rules in six weeks as promised, the door could open to summoning these individuals to stand trial. Let that sink in. I want to thank Meike Terhorst, the courageous lawyer who helped me gain access to the court. And I thank the Dutch people, who welcomed me with open arms. 🇳🇱 This case has lit a spark across the world. Millions have read my reports. Hundreds of thousands have shared them. The dam is breaking. Now I’m in Ireland, preparing for the next chapter. Meetings are underway. Something significant is coming. And yes — it’s about unity. Across Europe, across America, around the globe — patriots are rising. Through Freedom Train International — now the fastest-growing freedom movement in the world — we are thundering forward. The globalists are out of time. 💥 CBDCs. Digital ID. 15-minute gulags. Surveillance cities. Media manipulation. It’s all connected. And we are pushing back. 🔥 If you haven’t already — 👉 Join us at http://freedomtraininternational.org 📢 Become a member. Fuel the fight. ✊ Stand with us for truth, justice, and human freedom. We are the army of light. And we are winning.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jim Ferguson reports from Ireland on a court case in Luswarden regarding the Covid pandemic and mRNA "gene therapies." Accusations were made against figures like Bill Gates, Albert Buhler (Pfizer CEO), Mark Rutte, and Klaus Schwab, alleging genocide, biological weapons use, and media collusion. Lawyers for all but Bill Gates attended. A judgment is expected in six weeks.
The lead lawyer, Arno van Kessel, was arrested and detained in a maximum-security prison without charge, allegedly to stop the case. Ferguson thanks the Dutch people and millions of online supporters. He is in Ireland for meetings related to "unity," hinting at future developments.
Ferguson emphasizes the importance of uniting against the "globalist agenda," including central bank digital currencies and digital IDs. He promotes Freedom Train International and thanks supporters for fueling the movement. He asserts the Covid pandemic was a "war on humanity" and those responsible must be held accountable. He praises the free independent media for getting the truth out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, good morning. This is Jim Ferguson. I wanted to give you all a little bit of an update. I attended the court case at Luswarden, and it was really quite remarkable because of what was being said in terms of the whole Covid pandemic, the rollout of the mRNA gene therapies, sometimes they call them vaccines. But you know something, it was really quite astounding to hear certain terminology being used, And against people that are very well known in the public eye, like Bill Gates, like Albert Buhler, the CEO of Pfizer, Mark Rutte, the former prime minister of The Netherlands who's now heading NATO, as well as others like Claus Schwab of the World Economic Forum.
There was accusations of genocide, biological weapons being used, collusion with the media. In fact, there are two journalists who've been named as being colluding with this whole narrative as well. And this is something that is going to develop further. I mean, we we we are starting to see the cracks beginning to show, and I've been contacted by a lot of people in other countries that are very, interested in what's going on here. This could be the opening salvo in getting to the truth, getting to hold the people who were involved in this accountable.
These are very, very serious accusations. And if they are borne out, then we're talking about crimes against humanity. Now, the last time these types of accusations were made was at Nuremberg, after the Nazis were were defeated and many people stood trial. This could lead to a new Nuremberg trial, Nuremberg two, if you like. So it's worth watching.
I mean, we're we're gonna be covering this. We're gonna be giving a lot more analysis, but the wording that was used in the court was leaving no one in any doubt just how serious these accusations are. And all of these people, with the exception of Bill Gates, sent their own lawyers to listen to the evidence, to try to counter it. But if the judge makes a judgment as they said they will in approximately six weeks once they've had a look through the mountains of evidence that was being presented to the court, then I think it's going to develop further. And there are so many people taking an active interest in all of this internationally now as well.
I want to thank the Dutch people for the incredible welcome that I received there. When they saw me there, they were very keen to get me into the court. Of course, Micah Terhorst, another top lawyer and a friend who I've gotten to know over the last few years in The Netherlands was able to get me access into the court courthouse itself as well. And she was sitting beside me and I was listening intently to everything that was unfolding. So thank you to the Dutch people.
We are standing absolutely shoulder to shoulder with you, and I thank Edward for the interview that he did with me and and the others. And I'm going to be going back to The Netherlands, you know, to get more information and to find out exactly what judgment is going to be made. But we could see Bill Gates, we could see Albert Buhler of Pfizer, we could see Claus Schwab and all these others being summoned to the court, and of course if that happens they might go on to the stand to give evidence, to counter the things that they've been accused of. But these are really very serious accusations. And what's incredibly important in all of this is that Arno van Kessel, the lead lawyer, was arrested at his home four weeks ago by specialized armed police officers.
That's right. They blindfolded him. They handcuffed him. They detained him. They took him in, and they've put him into a maximum security prison without charge.
They're just holding him. They, in my opinion, try to stop this court case from going ahead. What is it they're so frightened of? What is it they're so terrified of coming out? Well, I think I know, and I think you probably know as well.
But they failed to stop the court papers getting to the court, so the case was able to proceed. I also want to thank the millions of people out there, and yes, it's been millions. I've written articles over the last few days. Many of them have gone over, a million views, and some have actually exceeded 2,000,000. So that is the level of interest that has been shown in what is going on here.
I also want to thank the hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people that reposted this, that have reached out to me and and with the messages and the comments of support. I really do appreciate it. And, I've tried to reply to to to as many as I can, but the volume has been so dramatic that I haven't had a chance to thank every one of you or to to like the the comments. But but but believe me, I very much do appreciate it. And part of that is because I'm no longer in The Netherlands.
I flew back to The United Kingdom briefly, and now I'm in Ireland. And I'm I've asked I've been asked to come to Ireland for a very specific purpose, and I'm going to be taking part in a series of meetings over the next few days. And this is really quite important. I'm here for a very specific purpose and reason. I can't go into too much of that at this point because of what is going to develop from this, but it is incredibly important.
And I'll give you a clue: unity is strength. So there will be more to be revealed in all of that. I'm very excited to be here. It's very early in the morning. I think it's about 06:00.
It's a beautiful, beautiful sunny day, and of course I love Ireland. And I'm no stranger to coming to visit here as well. Once again, I've been made very welcome here. I had a wonderful dinner with friends and I've got a bit of a journey ahead of me to go to where I'm meeting with quite a number of people to discuss the things that I'm here to discuss. But you know something, I feel that progress is being made.
I think that the patriots across Europe, the patriots across America, and the patriots around the world are indeed starting to unite. And that's been my primary focus for some time now, especially through Freedom Trade International, which is now the largest and the fastest growing freedom movement in the world. We have ambassadors in multiple countries now, and we are starting to really get momentum building here. And it's so important that people do unite, that people come together, because it's the only way we're going to push back against the darkness that is the globalist agenda that is unfolding. It's all connected.
The central bank digital currencies, the digital ID, the fifteen minute gulags or smart cities as they like to call them, the geo fencing, the control mechanisms. All of these things are designed to take away our privacy and our freedom and our ultimate destiny. But we're fighting back and it's thanks to all of you out there who support me personally, who subscribe to the channel, who become members of Freedom Train International. When you go to the website, freedomtraininternational.org, and get signed up and subscribe there, you are fuelling the fire, you're fuelling the furnace, and it's starting to burn hotter and hotter and hotter. That Freedom Train is thundering down the tracks at an incredible pace now.
So I just wanted to give you all a little bit of an update and to thank you for your incredible support. Not only do the people of my own particular channel support me and follow me and push out that content, which is incredibly important, There's been thousands of new members to the channel. I want to thank each and every one of you. It's like an international family actually. Are uniting, we are getting people together, we are pushing things forward in a really quite dramatic way.
We're getting to the truth and we're fighting for freedom, we're fighting for humanity, because, as I always say, this was, in fact, a war on humanity that was declared a few years ago. And people need to understand the darkness and the motives behind the people that were responsible for this. There was millions of people around the world who have lost their lives, who've been injured, their businesses destroyed during the lockdowns. The people responsible for this pre planned this, and they need to be held to account. And that's why the court case in Luswarden was so incredibly important, maybe more important than any of us realise, because it's opening the door now to reveal motivations and why they did what they did.
But I believe justice is coming. I want you to know that I'm fighting in the front lines for you and to get that truth out there and to let you know what's going on. So I'll probably keep it fairly brief at that, but I want you to understand that the next chapter is Ireland. I'm here for a very specific reason and I'll be coming back again for multiple occasions to push all of this agenda forward. But it's exciting and I'm delighted to be here with friends again.
But once again, you to each and every one of you for your support, for helping to get the truth out there. It's incredibly important because the lying mainstream media, they're not touching any of it. They won't go near it because why? Well, they are part of the problem. They censor, they control, they control the perceptions of the narratives.
But the free independent media are definitely getting the truth out there and so are all of you. Well done to each and every one of you. You are quite literally an army of freedom fighters and truth tellers and I appreciate every single one of you. So I will go now. I'm getting ready to head off.
I need to get some coffee, get some caffeine in my blood and then I'm off to fight and to do the next few things I'm going to be doing here. But I will be giving you an update. It's pretty exciting stuff actually, I've got be honest and if we achieve what we're going to be achieving hopefully then I'll be telling you all about it in due course. Anyway, wherever you are in the world stay safe, keep fighting for freedom, keep tuning in there's a lot more to tell you and I'll be telling you in the next few days. So, until next time, this is Jim Ferguson reporting from Ireland, the beautiful Emerald Isles, Erringo Brah, unity is strength, and I'll speak soon to you.
Thank you. Bye bye for now.
New landing page – Inspiration Station
freedomtraininternational.org
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I reported from a historic court case in Leeuwarden, Netherlands, where global figures like Bill Gates and Ursula von der Leyen were named in serious accusations of conspiracy and crimes against humanity. Despite attempts to halt the proceedings, including the arrest of the lead lawyer, nearly 200 documents were presented. I witnessed firsthand the unraveling of lies. A judgment is expected in six weeks, potentially leading to criminal prosecutions of these leaders. This moment could mark the beginning of significant change, and the world is paying attention.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
https://t.co/8M0BSkCNXk 🚨 BREAKING: GLOBALIST ELITES NAMED IN DUTCH COURT 🚨 🧨 This is Jim Ferguson reporting from the Netherlands — the day after a historic court case in Leeuwarden that could ignite a global firestorm. Inside the courtroom, I heard it with my own ears: Bill Gates. Ursula von der Leyen. Albert Bourla. Klaus Schwab. Mark Rutte. All named and accused of conspiracy, bioterrorism, and crimes against humanity. They tried to stop this case. They arrested the lead lawyer, Arno van Kessel, blindfolded him, cuffed him, and locked him in a maximum-security prison. But the evidence — nearly 200 documents — made it to court. I was granted special access inside. Alongside respected Dutch journalist Djamila le Pair, I witnessed the moment the lies began to crumble. This was no ordinary hearing. This was the start of something monumental. 👨⚖ A judgement is due in six weeks. 🔥 If this proceeds, it could trigger criminal prosecutions of global leaders. 📢 The world is watching. And the people are rising. The media won’t cover it. So we will. Share this. Tag everyone. Let them know — Nuremberg 2.0 has begun. @MeikeTerhorst
Video Transcript AI Summary
A court hearing took place following the arrest of Arno van Kessel, a key figure in a case accusing Alfred Bourla from Pfizer, news channel editors, and Dutch politicians. The hearing addressed a request to hear expert witnesses, including Catherine Olsen Fitts, in a separate case brought by three victims. The defense argued against the need for witnesses, citing readily available online information, but the victims' lawyer insisted on in-person testimony before the court.
The discussion included Bill Gates' lack of defense, with his lawyer deferring to the court. Concerns were raised about van Kessel's arrest, allegedly by a police unit with ties to NATO, which is also accused of involvement in a misinformation campaign related to the pandemic. Van Kessel has been suspended as a lawyer, and is being held in a prison with interrogation rooms and a psychiatric ward, raising concerns about intimidation and due process. Supporters believe the case is of international importance and could spark further legal actions globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need people to go to prison. We need justice for the victims of these heinous crimes. And the charges of genocide, the charges of biological weapons that are being used, these are very serious charges. If if the judge in this case puts them on trial, I'm telling you the international media will blow up and we might see another Nuremberg trial take place.
Speaker 1: I think maybe for to summarize for the audience Yeah. Because they're sort of falling into this thing. This was a court hearing where a mister Stasse, a lawyer, lost his colleague, the main driver of this court case, Arno van Kessel, because he was arrested on the June 11. He is taken into a highly secured prison in the South Of Holland so that his family can't visit him. I I understand there's been no contact yet.
Speaker 2: Perfect. Perfect.
Speaker 3: Leave the fornate the lungs and for men's. Gear. That's all. Yeah. Well, my best friend, Anno von Kessel, the the Hebrewscheid of Bethelift,
Speaker 4: and I'd like Nervoushock, who's
Speaker 3: I met who Haiberhandled was.
Speaker 5: Yeah, it is the Landsat Foucault. The main meaning is it shows that Landsat And go check it out.
Speaker 1: We're here. We're here in front of the courthouse in Lejorden, and we're here with Jim Ferguson. Welcome, Jim.
Speaker 0: It's an absolute honor to be here standing with the Dutch people on this what is a historic court case that's unfolding. Absolutely pleasure to be here.
Speaker 1: It is an absolute historic court case, and it's a pity you don't speak Dutch because it was a bull's eye, no, all the gloves off kind of court case. Meike, what is your impression of the hearing today?
Speaker 6: Well, everything was said, and it was said quite loudly. So, we're here for the truth, and there are three people who make their request for to hear witnesses. And but there were
Speaker 1: Two victims of the of the JEBS. Yes.
Speaker 6: Yeah. Three victims of the JEBS that make a separate court case, separate from the earlier one, is already taken place. And there they request to hear several witness, such as Catherine Olsen Fitts, Seshi Lathi Pofa, and others. And Mike Heiden?
Speaker 1: Because the discussion was a lot about Mike Heiden.
Speaker 6: Mike Heiden. Yeah. And well, it's interesting because the defendant is also Borla, who is a foyer former employer of Mike Eden. So it's quite But it was quite interesting to see that the defendant The the lawyers of the defendants, they were taking it quite seriously. It was taking a lot of time.
They said it was inappropriate to hear the witnesses because there we could already read everything in the online media and so on. But I think that missus Stassen, the lawyer, made a very good point, acting on behalf of the victims, that it is necessary that to give testimony before the court, because it's the highest instance in The Netherlands, and it's independent.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And then the discussion was a lot about what we already have so many experts, and why don't you take their word for it? But then mister Slussen said, well, this is a choice of the victims. This is their case. This is the victims.
The the experts they want to hear. I thought that was a very good point.
Speaker 2: Peter Stassen did a marvelous job. He was talking straight. He he reacted very well on the lack of defense from those eight.
Speaker 6: It's it's Eight lawyers. Ridiculous.
Speaker 2: Eight lawyers. And then he just himself, by himself, and he gave all the right answers, and he had Yeah.
Speaker 6: Well, he had a charred chasel.
Speaker 2: The chasel was great. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Was it for you? Because you sat in the room and you don't speak Dutch fluently, I understand. Did you get anything from it?
Speaker 0: I did because my colleague is somewhere around. I'm not sure where she is at the moment, but she was translating for me because she is Dutch.
Speaker 1: So
Speaker 0: Ashley was get was getting the most salient points coming in. But as Mika was saying, Mika was saying, basically there there is a real hardcore of evidence coming out here. And I think what we are definitely doing is winning the information war. And it's thanks to the viewers, it's thanks to the people who tune in and listen in from all around the world. My own channel has hundreds of thousands of people that follow us from The United States, Canada, Europe, and around the world.
And I came here with the sole purpose of covering this particular case because I've been reporting on it over the last two days in particular. And I'm I'm very, very proud to stand with the Dutch people. Think you're a magnificent people, and I've always been made incredibly welcome here. But this is so important. It's an international president that's been sitting here.
And I said in several posts that this could set a new president for another Nuremberg two trial.
Speaker 1: All we need is momentum. We need something to get people to finally throw off all the their their how do you call it? Their blinkers? Yeah. People
Speaker 0: in prison. We need people to go to prison. We need justice for the victims of these heinous crimes. And the charges of genocide, the charges of biological weapons that are being used, these are very serious charges. If if the judge in this case puts them on trial, the I'm telling you the international media will blow up.
We might see another Nuremberg trial take place. And if civilian courts can't do it, military tribunals can.
Speaker 1: What did you all make of Bill Gates not having any defense other than saying I'll I'll comply to whatever the court says?
Speaker 2: I was weak. I
Speaker 6: think I think it was on behalf of the state. Because it was the lawyer mister Heemskerk. He's the representative of the state. Is
Speaker 1: Gates? Because and are for the state.
Speaker 2: And he would he said he adjusts to the defense of the state.
Speaker 6: Yeah. Yeah. So he yeah. So he said he will refer the matter to the court, which means he's not making any defense plea. And and I think, well well, mister Haimskeirk is one of the most brilliant lawyers in on on on on a civil Crisis.
Court cases. So it was quite interesting, I thought, to see him not making not saying anything. And and it well, he's right. Like, the judge has to allow these witnesses to be heard
Speaker 1: in principle. Witnesses or the expert?
Speaker 6: The expert. Well, it's just like it's a yeah. The the expert. Yeah. It's a little bit confusing, but it's like experts.
Yeah. And and but they because as a party in a civil proceeding, you have a right to collect evidence. So in principle, it needs to be granted this request
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 6: Unless there is, like, abuse of the the law. And this was not said. So it was So I think, yeah, mister Heinskeg was right that they're like, the judge in principle has to do it.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 6: And and I felt also was quite strong as well that as Stosser said, like, there is no consensus in science. There are scientists who give their testimony, and it's not a democracy that you have, like, a majority says this and a majority Yeah. A single scientist can make the difference for the whole group. And this is so true. So and a particular, like, with Catherine Ossenfitz, for example, she is very knowledgeable in on on very, subjects.
And also a clay like, she has a is is considered very knowledgeable also by many others. So it's not like that there are I think, like, they they miss Tasse also asked for the right amount of of the the right persons to be heard and good witness good experts. And so I hope that the the court will allow this hearing.
Speaker 1: I think maybe for to summarize for the audience Yeah. Because they're sort of falling into this thing. This was a court hearing where mister Stasse, a lawyer, lost his colleague, the main driver of this court case, Arno van Kessel, because he was arrested on the June 11. He is taken into a highly secured prison in the South Of Holland, that his family can't visit him. I I understand there's been no contact yet.
I just talked to a friend of his. And so in He's accusing Alfred Bourla from Pfizer, then there's two editors of main of a main news channel Half a news channel. And a and a newspaper. And then there's a bunch of Dutch politicians that are all accused in this case. But it consists, I understood today, of two cases.
So there was the original case that we had last year that's still ongoing. That was one of the arguments that that's why we shouldn't hear the experts. Because there was already a procedure going. But he said no, this is a different one. There are three clients that want to have their separate case.
Is that correct? Yeah, that's right. Just to to make a frame.
Speaker 6: And so, of course, it's very disconcerning that mister Von Kessel was arrested shortly beef yeah. Before after there was they handed in some papers paperwork to the court in the other court case. And, well, it was he was arrested by a special part of the police, which is also has links to the military. So in the other court case, there is also accusations against NATO.
Speaker 1: NATO's involvement in the corona Yeah.
Speaker 6: Pandemic. NATO was involved with the misinformation campaign and SIOP operation. So to mislead the population. And then it's quite, of course, bizarre that the same NATO can also may perhaps get the lawyer arrested via a special part of the police which works for NATO. So it sounds to me very old that a lawyer could be arrested and still we don't know anything about the charges.
Speaker 1: And it's absolutely ironic that we don't know anything about the charges. He's been temporarily suspended as a lawyer for six weeks. No. No. No.
No. No. I'm sorry. Six months.
Speaker 2: No. More. The last two years, he'd been three times suspended, and that means that he probably won't ever do his job anymore as a lawyer. The the dean of lawyers, he was there when he was picked up from his bed, and that was the third time in two years. So deliberately, they did this.
I'm sorry. I I Oh, thank you very much for that information. Yeah. They did this to
Speaker 1: have him But really just like Einar Fuhrmig in a way.
Speaker 2: Same story. I'm sorry. Same story. Yeah. Lawyers are the sole persons that can reach to the right, to the judges.
Yeah. If they You're doing fine. We understand. Yeah. He's been put away just so
Speaker 1: you can't Yeah. He's been also, maybe for the viewers abroad, he's been put away in this prison, which I find really scary. It's a prison that they have the interrogation rooms are inside the prison. So a judge can hear the prisoners online, but maybe also inside, and we don't get to see those prisoners because they also made a court case within the prison. So in theory, a prisoner doesn't have to come out again, and everything can happen inside.
And inside is also a psychiatric prison. So it's like Quantanamo Bay marries one flew over the cuckoo's nest. Yeah. It's a really scary concept, and they're building another one in Flushingen. Would you like add anything to this case?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I I would just say that there is huge international focus on what's going on here in The Netherlands. This case is is particularly important, and I believe it will lead to other actions being taken in other countries and other nations. So this could be the the spark that creates the fire that actually burns for justice for people all around the world. And I'm here to support what's going on here.
I'm here to stand with Van Van Kessel. I'm here to stand with the Dutch people who are worried and upset. But the truth will prevail, and they can't silence everybody. But what you're you're talking about there with him being put into that prison, detained, arrested at his home, that is what is pure intimidation. They they are trying to attack people.
They are trying to show them up as as an example of what will happen if you speak out, and that can't be tolerated. So all of us around the world need to band together. We need to unite. We need to support each other. And what you're doing here with the media that you're doing is incredibly important.
And all of us play a part in all of that. And it's a pleasure to be here to talk to you.
Speaker 1: Alright. Well, thank you very much for your time. Let's keep our fingers crossed. And thanks everybody for watching.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The USDA has approved genetically engineered vaccines for use in organic food production, compromising the integrity of the organic label. This change means that animals treated with DNA-altering injections can now be sold as certified organic, leading to concerns about purity and consumer deception. I believe this move reflects a broader agenda to undermine clean food and personal choice, as regulatory loopholes allow GE technology to infiltrate our food supply. It's crucial to defend the integrity of organic farming before it's irreversibly altered.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
BREAKING:🚨 ORGANIC ISN’T SAFE ANYMORE — USDA OPENS THE DOOR TO GENETIC ENGINEERING 🚨 🔴 The USDA has quietly approved genetically engineered (GE) vaccines for use in organic food production. 🔴 Yes — the very label millions trust is being corrupted from within. 🔴 Animals treated with DNA-altering injections can now be sold as certified organic. 🔥 THIS ISN’T SCIENCE — THIS IS SABOTAGE 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ The "organic" label no longer guarantees purity. ⚠️ GE technology is being smuggled into your food through regulatory loopholes. ⚠️ Consumers are being deliberately deceived. ⚠️ This is a globalist war on clean food, bodily autonomy, and informed choice. 💥 First, they altered the food supply. 💥 Then, they blurred the labels. 💥 Now, they’re injecting biotechnology into what was once sacred — our organic farms. 🚨 THIS ISN’T ABOUT HEALTH — THIS IS ABOUT CONTROL 🚨 Corrupt agencies. Complicit certifiers. They want a future where nothing is natural — and nothing is yours. 👊 Reject the deception. Defend organic integrity. Because once it's gone — it's gone forever. https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-08-22-usda-allows-ge-vaccines-in-organic-food-production.html
BEWARE: USDA allows genetically engineered vaccines to infiltrate organic food production – NaturalNews.com
The Alliance for Natural Health (ANH-USA) discussed in an article how the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and other organic certifiers are allowing the genetically engineered (GE) vaccines to infiltrate organic food production. In 2019 the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), an advisory committee of the USDA, decided to consider the use of vaccines produced through “excluded methods” or […]
naturalnews.com
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the warnings from farmers across the U.S. about soil and water contamination from “forever chemicals.” These toxic compounds, particularly PFAS, are infiltrating our crops and livestock, threatening livelihoods and food safety. This crisis is not just an environmental concern; it’s a national emergency. Generational farms are facing bankruptcy, food is being removed from shelves, and the chemical companies remain silent. The contamination of our food supply is a systemic issue that impacts our freedom and well-being. The struggle for farmers is real and urgent.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 U.S. FARMERS SOUND THE ALARM: OUR LAND IS BEING POISONED 🚨 🔴 Across America, farmers are warning that their soil and water are being contaminated by “forever chemicals” — toxic compounds that never break down and accumulate in the food chain. 🧪 PFAS, sprayed on fields through sewage sludge, are now poisoning crops, livestock, and livelihoods. 🔥 THIS ISN’T JUST AN ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE — IT’S A NATIONAL EMERGENCY 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ Generational farms are going bankrupt. ⚠️ Food is being pulled from shelves. ⚠️ The chemical giants? Silent. Untouchable. 💥 This isn’t accidental. It’s systemic. 💥 When the food supply is contaminated, freedom is too. 🚨 THE WAR ON FARMERS IS REAL. AND IT’S COMING TO A FIELD NEAR YOU. 🚨
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers express sadness and anger over "forever chemicals" that have allegedly destroyed land, farming, water, and public health. Farms are said to be contaminated with chemicals linked to liver damage, fertility issues, thyroid problems, and cancer.
The speakers claim that prime soil, crops, and milk are tainted, leaving farmers on the brink of ruin and contributing to high suicide rates. They allege that officials chose to conceal the issue. One speaker states they "just wanted to milk our cows and be left to hell alone."
According to the CDC, these chemicals are impacting 97% of Americans. One speaker welcomes the news investigation, stating that the entire country will deal with the fallout.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: EPA, FDA, political leaders, where have you been? How did you miss this that now we have an entire country, an entire country that could potentially be in peril from this forever chemical that's destroyed your land, destroyed our farming, destroyed our water, and destroyed public health and welfare. Wow.
Speaker 1: There's so much sadness and anger. This has
Speaker 2: broken our hearts and crushed our spirit, and I don't know if we'll ever get that back. Told their farms are shot through with chemicals linked with liver damage, damage to fertility, thyroid issues, and cancer. All of this land has been poisoned, water contaminated, all of these people touched by this. Called forever chemicals because they are nearly impossible to destroy. Prime soil, crops, milk tainted in the heartland, leaving many farmers on the brink of ruin.
Speaker 1: Suicide among dairy farmers and farmers in general is incredibly high because a lot of these farms are third, fourth, and fifth generation. You are gonna be the person to lose it. Your great great great grandfather cleared the land, and you are going to be the person to have a bankruptcy auction because you can't hold on to the land.
Speaker 2: This is the story of how their farmland was destroyed right out from under them.
Speaker 0: Greed. Money.
Speaker 2: We'll take you to ground zero of where it all began. You never wanted to be an activist.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to milk our cows and be left to hell alone.
Speaker 2: And show you how far back the paper trail goes.
Speaker 1: When they had the choice of do we go public with this or do we sweep it under the rug, they chose the rug.
Speaker 2: And with these chemicals now impacting ninety seven percent of Americans according to the CDC, what you and your family need to know.
Speaker 0: I am glad News Nation is looking into this problem. All of us, the entire country will deal with the fall out.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
At the World Economic Forum, I was struck by Larry Fink's statement that replacing humans with machines will be easier in countries with declining populations. This suggests that depopulation is not just a crisis but part of a broader automation strategy. It feels alarming to think that the global elite are envisioning a future where human labor is unnecessary. AI is being framed not merely as a tool for innovation but as a means of elimination. Their intentions are becoming clearer, and it feels urgent to recognize the implications for our future.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 BLACKROCK CEO LARRY FINK AT WEF: “SUBSTITUTING HUMANS FOR MACHINES WILL BE EASIER IN COUNTRIES WITH DECLINING POPULATIONS” 🤖💀🚨 🔴 At the World Economic Forum, Larry Fink didn’t hold back — 🗣️ “Substituting humans for machines is going to be far easier in those countries that have declining populations.” 🔥 READ THAT AGAIN. THEY’RE OPENLY TALKING ABOUT REPLACING YOU 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ Depopulation isn’t just a crisis — it’s part of their automation strategy. ⚠️ The global elite are preparing for a world where you’re no longer needed. ⚠️ AI isn’t just innovation — it’s elimination. 💥 They warned us with quiet words. 💥 Now they’re saying it out loud — at Davos. 🚨 THE FUTURE THEY’RE BUILDING HAS NO ROOM FOR YOU. WAKE UP. 🚨
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’ve come across alarming information confirming the presence of graphene oxide and nanotech in COVID vaccines, leading to electromagnetic phenomena in the human body. The magnet tests people conducted were genuine. Meanwhile, a vast network of 5G and 6G towers is being rapidly constructed without public oversight, suggesting a hidden agenda. This situation implies that those vaccinated were injected with nanotech, and the infrastructure for control is already in place. What was once dismissed as conspiracy is now a concerning reality of global technological dominance.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
https://t.co/pMFxqAs7aj BREAKING: 🚨 IT’S ALL CONNECTED: SCIENTISTS NOW CONFIRM GRAPHENE OXIDE & NANOTECH IN THE COVID VACCINES — AND PEOPLE WERE BECOMING ELECTROMAGNETIC ⚠️🚨 🔴 “Billions of nanoparticles… Graphene oxide… We were seeing electromagnetic fields form inside the human body.” Yes — the magnet tests were REAL. They laughed. They silenced. They banned. Now the truth is breaking loose — and it’s far darker than anyone imagined. 🔥 AND GUESS WHAT’S BEING BUILT RIGHT NOW — AT FULL SPEED? 🔥 ⚠️ A massive grid of 5G AND 6G towers — going up on rooftops, in schools, in neighborhoods across the globe. ⚠️ No oversight. No discussion. Just silent deployment while your attention is elsewhere. 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ You were injected with nanotech. ⚠️ The infrastructure to interface with your body is already online. ⚠️ It’s not just surveillance — it’s control. ⚠️ They mocked you for asking questions — because the answers would collapse the narrative. 💥 The magnetism was real. 💥 The towers are real. 💥 The agenda is undeniable. 🚨 THIS ISN’T A CONSPIRACY THEORY ANYMORE. THIS IS A GLOBAL TECHNOLOGICAL TAKEOVER. 🚨
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mars 2021, un grand nombre de personnes ont réalisé que les individus vaccinés devenaient quasiment tous électromagnétiques au point d'injection. En Espagne, le docteur Pablo Compra a découvert la présence de nanoparticules d'oxyde de graphène dans les flacons de Pfizer. En Italie, les docteurs Gati Montanari ont découvert les mêmes composants inorganiques.
Ils ont également découvert plusieurs dizaines d'autres composants qui ne figuraient pas dans la liste officielle. En Argentine, Lorena Diblasi et Marcella Songorine ont fait les mêmes découvertes, mais en pire s'agissant des métaux lourds et des composants non déclarés, dont certains sont mortels. En Allemagne, en Angleterre, en Corée ou encore en Australie, même recherche, même résultat, même constat. En août 2021, au Japon, le ministère de la Santé a fait retirer tous les lots des vaccins Moderna en raison d'une contamination. Les chercheurs affirment qu'il s'agit d'un crime contre l'humanité, organisé et planifié. Ces photos représentent les nanoparticules disposées aux nano réseau auto assemblées, présents dans tous les vaccins anti covid-19.
***
In March 2021, many people realized that vaccinated individuals were becoming almost all electromagnetic at the point of injection. In Spain, Dr. Pablo Compra discovered the presence of graphene oxide nanoparticles in Pfizer vials. In Italy, Doctors Gati Montanari discovered the same inorganic components.
They also discovered several dozen other components that were not on the official list. In Argentina, Lorena Diblasi and Marcella Songorine made the same discoveries, but worse in terms of heavy metals and undeclared components, some of which are deadly. In Germany, England, Korea and Australia, same research, same result, same observation. In August 2021, in Japan, the Ministry of Health withdrew all batches of Moderna vaccines due to contamination. Researchers claim that this is a crime against humanity, organized and planned. These photos represent the nanoparticles arranged in self-assembled nano-networks, present in all anti-covid-19 vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Et je termine là-dessus. C'est le poster que vous avez derrière moi, mars deux-mille-vingt-et-un. Un grand nombre de personnes ont réalisé que les individus vaccinés devenaient quasiment tous électromagnétiques à minima au point d'injection. Mai deux-mille-vingt-et-un, en Espagne, le docteur Pablo Compra découvrait par le biais de son microscope électronique à transmission, la présence de 1000000000 de nanoparticules d'oxyde de graphène dans les flacons de Pfizer. En Italie, les docteurs Gati Montanari découvraient les mêmes composants inorganiques avec leurs microscopes électroniques à balayage environnemental.
Ils ont également plusieurs dizaines d'autres composants qui ne figuraient pas dans la liste des composants officiels déclarés par les sociétés pharmaceutiques. En Argentine, Lorena Diblasi et Marcella Songorine ont fait les mêmes découvertes mais en pire s'agissant des métaux lourds et des composants non déclarés, cinquante-cinq composants non déclarés dont certains sont mortels. En Allemagne, en Angleterre, en Corée ou encore en Australie, même recherche, même résultat, même constat. Rappelez-vous qu'en août deux-mille-vingt-et-un, au Japon, le ministère de la Santé a fait retirer tous les lots des vaccins de la société Moderna en raison d'une découverte de contamination. Mais de quelle contamination parle-t-on Aujourd'hui tous ces chercheurs sont formels, il ne s'agit pas d'une contamination mais d'un véritable crime contre l'humanité.
Un crime machiavélique organisé et planifié depuis longtemps. Ce que vous voyez sur ce poster, ce sont les meilleures images que nous ayons actuellement en notre possession. Ces photos représentent les nanoparticules disposées aux nano réseau auto assemblées. Ils sont présents dans tous les vaccins anti covid dix-neuf, peu importe la société pharmaceutique qui les produit.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I came across some startling claims about Jeffrey Epstein's death, suggesting it was an execution rather than a suicide. According to Patrick Byrne and Ann Vandersteel, guards were incapacitated with nitrous oxide, and 14 security cameras were disabled, indicating a coordinated operation rather than negligence. They allege a state actor was involved, and a corrupt officer may have facilitated the hit. This narrative challenges the official story, implying Epstein was silenced to protect powerful individuals. The truth is reportedly surfacing, and the implications are significant.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
BREAKING:🚨 EPSTEIN MURDER BOMBSHELL: GUARDS DRUGGED, CAMERAS DISABLED, STATE ACTOR INVOLVED 🚨 🔴 Investigative revelations discussed by Patrick Byrne and Ann Vandersteel suggest Jeffrey Epstein didn’t die by suicide — he was executed. 🗣️ According to new insider intel: 🔹 Guards were knocked unconscious with nitrous oxide gas — confirmed by blood tests taken the next morning. 🔹 A state-level actor allegedly placed the gas canister and ran a pipe to the guards’ location. 🔹 14 security cameras were simultaneously disabled. 🔹 And a dirty cop on the inside may have carried out the hit. 🔥 THIS WASN’T NEGLIGENCE. THIS WAS A COORDINATED BLACK OP. 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ The “suicide” story is now in tatters. ⚠️ A professional operation silenced Epstein — before he could name names. ⚠️ This wasn’t a cover-up. It was an assassination behind prison walls. 💥 Byrne and Vandersteel's sources say the truth is leaking — and those behind it are getting nervous. 🚨 THE SYSTEM PROTECTED HIM — UNTIL HE BECAME A THREAT TO IT. 🚨 Cameras off. Guards gassed. One man silenced forever. But the names, the tapes, and the network? Still coming to light. Justice delayed isn’t justice denied. Stay awake. @PatrickByrne @annvandersteel
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual claims they received information about Jeffrey Epstein's death from someone seeking to convey the seriousness of the people involved. This individual states that a detail from the Epstein crime scene indicates it was murder, not suicide.
Specifically, the guards who supposedly fell asleep had traces of nitrous oxide in their blood. This suggests someone smuggled laughing gas into the facility, accessed the ventilation system, and incapacitated the guards. The individual speculates that 14 cameras were disabled, and a corrupt cop was released from a nearby cell to kill Epstein before returning to his cell. The hose and laughing gas canister were then removed. The individual suggests this level of sophistication points to a state-level actor, not a typical mob hit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Six months ago, I was sent a message. Well, I was sent somebody came to see me. And among the things that I was told eight months ago, among the things I was told so that I would understand what we are up against is I was told a detail of the crime scene. Oh, I'm getting a message from someone saying, do not reveal this. Sorry.
I actually got a message from I got a message
Speaker 1: that that
Speaker 0: do I just got a message flashed up to me from someone saying, do not reveal this. And it's a person who Okay. Knows.
Speaker 2: Okay. I don't want anybody I don't want you to reveal anything that could
Speaker 1: inform an investigation or inform you. That's okay. That's okay.
Speaker 0: No. I'll tell you. I'm gonna tell you. It was from the Epstein death scene. It was a detail that was shared with me.
Just one little detail of the scene that tells you that was conveyed to me so I would understand what we are up against. And the okay. Do you do you that and the the detail of the scene of the crime scene was one that this one detail shows that it was not a suicide. It was in fact a murder. And there's a detail that once you understand it reveals we have to be this isn't the Gambino family.
This isn't the Genovese family. This had the sophistication. Well, I've got to say it now because otherwise they will might kill me. Literally, there was just someone sending me flash message. Do not say this.
But so this is the you know how the guards
Speaker 1: Come on, Patrick. You
Speaker 0: You know how the guards we know that the guards okay. To the person who just sent me that message, send me an explanation. Should I or should I not? If you don't want me to say this, give me 10 words as to why I should not say this. In the meantime, I'm gonna give a little bit more color.
It was a detail that was meant to communicate to me. It was a murder and indicate to me the seriousness of the people behind it. Well, I guess it's too late. It was the Epstein crime scene and the guards I was told that the guards, you know, who fell asleep in the Right. Fell asleep and we all assumed were brought.
Yeah. We all thought that. Well, guess what? They did fall asleep. Their blood was tested the next morning, and they found traces of nitrous oxide.
So what's that tell you, Anne?
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 0: That could help with laughing gas. But doctors use it, laughing gas.
Speaker 1: Dentists use it. Dentists use it. Right.
Speaker 0: So that tells us that somebody snuck into a federal facility a canister of laughing gas. They got access to the ventilation system. They snaked a hose to the right room, turned it on, knocked out the guards. Then I was they they knocked out 14 cameras on that floor, probably let there's a goon cop down a dirty cop who was in a cell down the block. He was probably the guy who did it.
This was not this was not confirmed to me, but he was let in. His door was open. He went and killed Epstein. And then they and went back to your cell. And then they retrieved the hose.
Someone retrieved the hose and x x filled, took out the the canister of laughing gas. Now that tells us something. Does that sound like a Gambino hit, or does that sound like maybe a state level actor?
Speaker 1: State level for sure. Absolutely. Mossad or
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Hungary's "Stop Soros" laws in 2018 aimed to combat foreign-funded NGOs that facilitated illegal immigration, marking a decisive stance against EU migrant relocation schemes. I believe Soros is not a philanthropist but a globalist who fosters chaos through open-border activism, undermining national sovereignty. His influence manipulates politics and media, targeting nations like Hungary and Poland that resist his agenda. To protect culture and borders, nations must recognize Soros as the architect of this crisis and demonstrate the courage to resist.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 HUNGARY WAS RIGHT: SOROS ISN’T A PHILANTHROPIST — HE’S AN ARCHITECT OF DESTABILISATION 🚨 🔴 In 2018, Hungary passed the “Stop Soros” laws — criminalizing foreign-funded NGOs that aided mass illegal immigration. 🛑 They outlawed the EU’s migrant relocation schemes. They drew the line. 🗣️ Orban saw it. Hungary saw it. The floodgates weren’t accidental — they were designed. 🔥 GEORGE SOROS IS A GLOBALIST ENGINEER OF CHAOS 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS FOR THE WORLD: ⚠️ He bankrolls open-border activism that erodes national sovereignty ⚠️ His networks manipulate politics, law, and media to enforce global governance ⚠️ Nations that resist — from Hungary to Poland — are smeared, sanctioned, and silenced 💥 If you want to preserve your culture, borders, and future — Hungary showed the way 💥 This isn’t compassion — it’s controlled collapse under the disguise of “human rights” 🚨 ANY NATION THAT WANTS TO HALT MASS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION MUST RECOGNISE THE SOURCE 🚨 🌍 Soros isn’t a symptom. He’s the strategist behind the crisis. ✊ National survival requires courage. Hungary had it. Will your leaders?
Video Transcript AI Summary
European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest following Hungary's vote to criminalize individuals or groups aiding asylum seekers. This move defies the EU and human rights groups. Austrian Chancellor Kurtz and Hungarian leader Orban, both immigration hardliners, are attending.
Hungary also outlawed EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Orban views himself as the defender of Christian Europe against a perceived Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign, popular in Hungary, paints George Soros as the organizer of this "invasion," despite Hungary having low immigration rates.
Human rights groups are disappointed and look to the EU and the Council of Europe for recourse. The EU Commission is expected to react, but Orban has defied the EU before. While the EU can threaten sanctions, excluding a member state is difficult, especially with rising populist support. A mini-summit on migration is planned in Brussels, highlighting the issue's urgency despite low immigrant numbers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: European leaders in favor of a restrictive migration policy are gathering in Budapest today for a meeting of minds. It follows yesterday's vote in Hungary to stop Soros. That's a series of laws that criminalize any individual or group who help asylum seekers, including NGOs. Well, the move defies the EU and human rights groups. Amongst those at the meeting will be Austrian chancellor Sebastian Kurtz, an immigration hardliner, as well as Hungarian leader Victor Orban.
And MPs also passed an amendment saying, and quote, alien population cannot settle in Hungary, outlawing EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers from Italy and Greece. Well, joining us from Paris now is Dutch journalist Stephane de Vries. Stephane, this is again another complicated topic. Why are there why is there so much support on tightening restrictions on asylum in Hungary?
Speaker 1: Well, Victor Orban sees himself as the defender of Christian Europe, as the protector, as perceived Muslim invasion. And this rhetoric brought him a crushing victory in the last elections in April. He won a two third majority in the parliament. And, well, we've seen that in other countries as well. Being tough on immigration attracts voters.
We've seen it in Italy, in in Austria, and other EU member states. And the Stop Soros campaign slogan was a very popular one. Now George Soros is seen as the person who is organizing this imaginary foreign invasion. Because if you look at the numbers, Hungary has actually one of the lowest immigration rates of the whole European Union. But George Soros is seen as the personification of this invasion.
And the fact that Soros is Hungarian, well, it probably really bothers, Orban who sees Soros as a some some traitor of his country, and that may be an explanation why this stop Soros bill, was, was voted by such a large majority, yesterday in Budapest.
Speaker 0: Obviously, this human rights groups obviously are not going to be happy with this. What can they do? What what will their response be to this?
Speaker 1: Well, of course, they are very disappointed and and even upset by this new rule. Their hope, of course, is the European Union. The Council of Europe, which is the continent's leading human rights institution, is currently reviewing the bill. They had asked the Hungarians to wait with the vote, but Budapest decided to ignore this call. But it may well be that this bill is not respecting any European laws.
I think later today, the European Commission will issue a reaction to what's happening now in Budapest, but the for the right for the moment, the human rights organizations, well, they really have to comply with the new rules because they risk a jail, a prison jail sorry, prison sentence of for a one year if they help illegal immigrants to apply for asylum. So the only hope now is European Commission and the Council of Europe. And I think later today, we'll we will have reactions from Brussels and probably also a warning to Victor Orban.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But, Stephane, it's not the first warning. The EU has already said before Hungary, you cannot do this, but Hungary went went ahead and did it. So act will that change anything? Will the EU's reaction change anything?
Speaker 1: You're absolutely right. Victor Orban has been defying the European Union for for many years now, and, we've seen that Brussels is basically well, they they can't do anything. They can threaten. We are seeing the same thing with Poland. They are, of course, trying to to get Poland on track because they are not respecting, according to Brussels, the basic rules of a of a law society.
And so so they can threaten, but what can they do? There is a procedure to exclude the European member states, but this has never been used in the history of Europe, and it would be very difficult because it's, well, it's very unpopular, especially now in these times that populist parties are getting more and more votes. So, yeah, the European Union can can yell. They can shout. But at the end, it's Viktor Orban who wins.
Speaker 0: And very briefly, Stefan, what's interesting is, again, we're gonna have this summit, and Hungary will be in the midst of all those leaders. What do you expect from that?
Speaker 1: Well, not much. I think the the the agreement will be that Hungary should respect European law, that the European Commission will look into it. But more importantly, there's another extra mini summit this weekend in Brussels with Italy, Germany, The Netherlands, a number of other countries on the the issue. So we see that the migrant issue is really well, we've talked about this many times this week already, is is one of the most urgent this week. And it really doesn't it's it's not logical because as we've seen, the numbers are down.
There are actually very few immigrants coming to Europe now. And even in in in Hungary, there are currently around 3,000 refugees living in Hungary on a population of 10,000,000. So there's a huge difference between reality and perception, and it will be the task of the European politicians to to to explain that this gap is is not not real, and, but it will be very difficult since the populists are so popular.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But what will be interesting is to watch the behind the scenes in those summits. Thank you very much, Stephane de Vries.