TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @NicHulscher

Saved - September 21, 2026 at 3:27 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I found that over 90% of American children are directly injected with alpha-gal through school-mandated vaccines. By age 6, children receive ~54 mg of alpha-gal-bearing gelatin via MMR and chickenpox vaccines. An estimated 450,000 Americans have alpha-gal syndrome. It’s not just lone star ticks.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

We found over 90% of American children are directly injected with ALPHA-GAL through school-mandated vaccines. By age 6, children receive ~54 mg of alpha-gal-bearing gelatin through MMR and chickenpox vaccines. Now an estimated 450,000 Americans have alpha-gal syndrome. It’s NOT just lone star ticks…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript states that over ninety percent of American children are “directly injected with alpha-gal” in vaccines before they go to school. It adds that these vaccines inject bovine gelatin that contains alpha-gal, specifying a value of fifty-four milligrams of alpha-gal. The speaker says they have “just published” what they describe as one of the most comprehensive papers on alpha-gal syndrome. According to the transcript, this paper identifies a “major, major possible contributor” to alpha-gal syndrome and explains why it has “exploded by ten thousand percent” over the past decade. The transcript emphasizes that the major contributor identified is vaccines. It contrasts this with the idea that alpha-gal syndrome is caused only by ticks, stating that the explanation is “not just ticks.” It further indicates that while ticks are mentioned, vaccines are presented as a key factor tied to the observed increase over the past decade. The transcript frames vaccines as the primary source of alpha-gal exposure in this account, highlighting that children receive alpha-gal through vaccine-administered bovine gelatin prior to school. Overall, the transcript conveys a chain of claims: (1) most American children receive alpha-gal through vaccines before school, (2) the injected bovine gelatin contains alpha-gal measured at fifty-four milligrams, (3) the speaker’s newly published comprehensive paper identifies vaccines as a major possible contributor to alpha-gal syndrome, and (4) this contributor is presented as explaining the reported ten thousand percent increase over the past decade, with an explicit statement that it is not just ticks.
Full Transcript
Over ninety percent of American children are directly injected with alpha-gal inside vaccines before they go to school, and so they're injected with bovine gelatin that contains alpha-gal, fifty-four milligrams of it. We just published one of the most comprehensive papers ever done on alpha-gal syndrome, and we identified a major, major possible contributor here, explaining why it's exploded by ten thousand percent over the past decade, and that is vaccines. It's not just ticks. It appears
Saved - September 19, 2026 at 10:57 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

CAUGHT ON CAMERA: Henry Ford’s longtime Infectious Diseases Chief said “I’M NOT A GOOD PERSON” for refusing to publish his own landmark study showing vaccinated kids were far unhealthier. “I’m just not gonna do it... I don’t want to suffer what McCullough did.” "Nothing is gonna come out of it other than me LOSING MY JOB." “I’d put it out just how it is.” “I’m not a good person.” Why would Dr. Marcus Zervos fear losing his job for publishing a study he believed was strong? That is a question Henry Ford Health needs to answer. Unfortunately, they DECLINED to show up to the Michigan House Oversight Hearing.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Marcus Zervos said he was very concerned when a person was seen on camera saying, “I’m just not gonna do it. I don’t want to. I don’t want to suffer what McCullough did. I’m just not gonna do it because I don’t want to.” Zervos reported that the person also said, “I’d put it out just how it is. If we weren’t in this world of censorship, I’d put it out just how it is,” and that he “thought this study was very strong.” Zervos emphasized that the person is “very well respected.” Zervos further said the person described reluctance to take action, stating: “Part of my reluctance to do anything is that nothing is going to come out of it other than me losing my job, which I’d rather not see happen.” Zervos repeated related lines, including: “I’m not a good person. I can’t handle it.” Zervos then asked why the person would be concerned about losing his job for conducting a study he thought was good, and said these questions “need to be answered by Henry Ford Health,” noting that they were not provided “here.”
Full Transcript
Marcus Zervos, I was very concerned when he was caught on that camera in that clip we saw saying I'm just not gonna do it. I'm not gonna do it because I don't want to. I don't want to suffer what McCullough did. I'm just not gonna do, I'm not gonna do it cause I don't wanna, I, I don't wanna suffer what McCullough, McCullough did. I was very concerned to hear that, and he even said, I'd put it out just how it is. If we weren't in this world of censorship, I'd put it out just how it is. He would. I'd put it out just how it is. Yeah. So he thought this study was very strong, and again, he's very well respected. And lastly, he, he said, Part of my reluctance to do anything is that nothing is going to come out of it other than me losing my job, which I'd rather not see happen. Part of my reluctance to do anything is that nothing is going to come out of it other than me losing my job, which I'd rather not see happen. No, I, I'm not a good person. I can't handle it. I, I'm not a good person. So why is he concerned about losing his job for conducting a study he thought was good? those are questions that need to be answered by Henry Ford Health, but they're not here, unfortunately.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

STUNNING: 57% of vaccinated children developed at least one chronic disease by age 10. Only 17% of unvaccinated children developed a chronic disease.... The landmark Henry Ford birth cohort study is one of the most POWERFUL vaccine safety studies ever conducted.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript describes a “strongest, most comprehensive, and largest” vaccinated versus unvaccinated birth cohort study on chronic disease outcomes. It included 18,000 children, all enrolled in the Henry Ford system, and followed them from birth to an average age of 10 years. Immunization records were verified using both medical records and the state immunization registry, so the study was not subject to recall bias. The vaccinated group had an average follow-up of 10 years (from birth to average age 10). After that period, 57% of vaccinated children had at least one chronic disease, compared with 17% of unvaccinated children. The study used standard epidemiological methods and accounted for confounding variables, including age, sex, preterm birth, and other baseline health status differences. After adjusting for these factors, the final statistical measure was that vaccinated children had 2.5 times higher risk of developing a chronic disease compared to unvaccinated children, based on the completed statistical modeling. The transcript characterizes this as a very powerful study.
Full Transcript
The strongest, most comprehensive, and largest vaccinated versus unvaccinated birth cohort study looking at chronic disease outcomes ever conducted. Okay, so it's the best of the best that we have so far. They had 18,000 children. The vaccinated group, after average 10 years, from birth to average age 10, Fifty-seven percent of the vaccinated had at least one chronic disease. Only seventeen percent of the unvaccinated had at least one chronic disease. They followed all of the standard epidemiological methods that they should have done for that data set. They followed the children from birth to average age ten. They were all enrolled in the Henry Ford system. They verified their immunization records with not only their medical records but also the state immunization registry. So this was not subject to recall bias. When they accounted for all of these confounding variables, age, sex preterm birth, other underlying differences in baseline health status, when they did all of that, adjusted for all of that, their final statistical measure was that vaccinated children had a two point five times higher risk of developing a chronic disease compared to the unvaccinated children. After all that statistical modeling that they were supposed to do. And so this is a very powerful study.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

I just dropped EXPLOSIVE vaccine data at the Michigan House Oversight Hearing that Henry Ford REFUSED to show up to… “ALL 22 of the chronic disease categories were proportionally HIGHER in the vaccinated children in the LARGEST and most COMPREHENSIVE vaccinated vs. unvaccinated https://t.co/9ojXURt5pS

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a peer-reviewed reanalysis of the largest and most comprehensive vaccinated versus unvaccinated birth cohort study to date, all twenty-two chronic disease categories were proportionally higher in the vaccinated children. Raw proportions reported include: any chronic condition (250% higher), asthma (553% higher), atopic disease/skin disorders (386% higher), autoimmune disease (1120% higher), cancer (54% higher), food allergies (128% higher), mental health disorders (696% higher), neurodevelopmental disorders (1254% higher), autism (180% higher), neurological disorder (26% higher), and seizure disorders (216% higher). Several conditions were reported as present only in the vaccinated group: autobrain dysfunction, diabetes, ADHD (262 cases; zero in the unvaccinated group), behavioral disabilities, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, other psychological disabilities, and motor disabilities. Other reported proportional increases included developmental delays (412% higher), speech disorders (803% higher), and motor disabilities (810% higher).
Full Transcript
All twenty-two of the chronic disease categories were proportionally higher in these vaccinated children in this largest and most comprehensive vaccinated versus unvaccinated birth cohort study to date. And we actually published a peer-reviewed reanalysis of these data. So it's actually in the peer-reviewed record now, and I want to read the raw numbers of these chronic disease categories. Any chronic condition, two hundred and fifty percent higher proportionally in the vaccinated. Asthma, five hundred and fifty-three percent higher in the vaccinated. Atopic disease, so skin disorders, three hundred and eighty-six percent higher in the vaccinated. Autoimmune disease, twelve hundred or eleven hundred and twenty percent higher in the vaccinated children. Autobrain dysfunction, this was only in the vaccinated group. Cancer, this was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated children. Diabetes, this was present only in the vaccinated children. Food allergies, this was one hundred and twenty-eight percent higher in the vaccinated children. Mental health disorders, this was six hundred and ninety-six percent higher in the vaccinated children. Neurodevelopmental disorders, this was twelve hundred and fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated children. ADHD, only in the vaccinated children. There was two hundred and sixty-two cases of ADHD. There was zero cases in the unvaccinated children. Autism, one hundred and eighty percent higher proportionally in the vaccinated children. Behavioral disabilities, only in the vaccinated children. Developmental delays, four hundred and twelve percent higher in the vaccinated children. Learning disabilities, only in the vaccinated children. Intellectual disabilities, only in the vaccinated children. Speech disorders, eight hundred and three percent higher proportionally in the vaccinated children. Motor disabilities, eight hundred and ten percent higher in the vaccinated children. Tics, only in the vaccinated. Other psychological disabilities this group was only in the vaccinated as well. Neurological disorder, twenty-six percent higher in the vaccinated. And lastly, seizure disorders, this was two hundred and sixteen percent higher in the vaccinated.
Saved - September 19, 2026 at 10:44 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I argue COVID shots functioned as chemical lobotomies. CDC data is cited to show COVID-19 “vaccines” triggered 146 neurological and psychiatric safety signals, which I say can explain serious personality changes. In my peer-reviewed analyses versus flu vaccination, I report extreme PRR/OR increases for conditions like cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (3,060x), CJD (847x), and psychotic symptoms (442x).

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

COVID shots functioned as chemical lobotomies. CDC data shows COVID-19 “vaccines” triggered 146 neurological and psychiatric safety signals. This explains serious personality alterations in some COVID vaccinated individuals. Some of the largest signals identified in our two peer-reviewed studies include: (PRR/OR >2 vs. flu vaccination): Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: 3,060X MORE LIKELY Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD): 847X MORE LIKELY Cerebral thrombosis: 794X MORE LIKELY Mental fatigue: 704X MORE LIKELY Suicidal depression: 534X MORE LIKELY Psychotic symptoms: 442X MORE LIKELY Dementia with Lewy bodies: 425X MORE LIKELY Self-injurious ideation: 385X MORE LIKELY Psychiatric investigation: 373X MORE LIKELY Schizophrenia: 315X MORE LIKELY Cerebral hemorrhage: 310X MORE LIKELY Psychiatric symptoms: 238X MORE LIKELY Panic attacks: 197X MORE LIKELY Suicide threats: 182X MORE LIKELY Herpetic CNS infections overall: 171X MORE LIKELY Mania: 155X MORE LIKELY Suicidal ideation: 153X MORE LIKELY Pachymeningitis: 152X MORE LIKELY Herpes zoster meningoradiculitis: 150X MORE LIKELY Limbic encephalitis: 146X MORE LIKELY Alzheimer’s-type dementia: 142X MORE LIKELY Dementia: 137X MORE LIKELY Herpetic meningoencephalitis: 136X MORE LIKELY Herpes simplex meningitis: 132X MORE LIKELY Noninfectious myelitis: 132X MORE LIKELY Brain abscess: 120X MORE LIKELY Herpes simplex meningoencephalitis: 120X MORE LIKELY Acute psychosis: 118X MORE LIKELY Anxiety: 117X MORE LIKELY Viral myelitis: 115X MORE LIKELY Mental impairment: 115X MORE LIKELY Physical assault: 114X MORE LIKELY CNS abscesses overall: 107X MORE LIKELY Brain fog: 104X MORE LIKELY Suicide attempts: 95.5X MORE LIKELY Prion disease: 62X MORE LIKELY Delirium: 54X MORE LIKELY Suicidal behavior: 44.5X MORE LIKELY Aggression: 35X MORE LIKELY CNS infections overall: 29X MORE LIKELY Homicidal ideation: 24.5X MORE LIKELY Transverse myelitis: 21X MORE LIKELY

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript claims that people have undergone what is described as a “chemical lobotomy.” It states that two papers published by the speaker analyzed the vaccine adverse event reporting system and found 146 neurological and psychiatric safety signals linked to COVID shots, described as “breached” safety signals. The listed neurological and psychiatric effects include cognitive impairment, dementia, Alzheimer’s, schizophrenia, depression, and psychosis. It also lists physical brain-related outcomes, including “brain clots,” strokes, demyelination syndromes (stated as destruction of the myelin sheath protecting neurons), central nervous system infection, and blood-brain barrier breach “allowing these vaccine materials and other pathogens to enter the brain from the blood.” Anxiety is described as a “very strong safety signal,” and prion diseases are also listed, described as the human equivalent of mad cow disease, including Creutzfeldt-Jakob’s disease. The transcript further claims that this range of neurological damage and related safety signals was reported “a hundred times more” with COVID shots than with flu shots. It concludes by saying that “all of this neurological damage will unfortunately change the personalities of some individuals.”
Full Transcript
They have undergone what's called a chemical lobotomy. And I say that because we've now published two papers looking at the vaccine adverse event reporting system, and we found there's been 146 neurological and psychiatric safety signals with the COVID shots. 146 safety signals that were breached, including cognitive impairment, dementia, Alzheimer's schizophrenia depression psychosis, and then the physical brain damage brain clots, strokes what's called demyelination syndromes, when the myelin sheath protecting the neurons is destroyed and a central nervous system infection, so the blood-brain barrier's actually becoming breached. Allowing these vaccine materials and other pathogens to enter the brain from the blood and anxiety that was a very strong safety signal, and prion diseases. And so the basically the human equivalent of mad cow disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob's disease this was like a hundred times more, more likely to be reported with the COVID shots than with the flu shots. And so all of this neurological damage will unfortunately change the personalities of some individuals.
Saved - September 16, 2026 at 1:40 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I just found Pfizer spike-encoding DNA inside a TURBO HEART CANCER. The hyper-aggressive tumors doubled in size every 10 days, then spread into his brainstem and he died. It feels undeniable that mRNA “vaccine” turbo cancer is real.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

This is the TURBO CANCER smoking gun… We just found Pfizer spike-encoding DNA directly inside a TURBO HEART CANCER. The hyper-aggressive tumors DOUBLED in size every 10 days. He died after the turbo cancer spread into his brainstem. It’s now undeniable: mRNA “vaccine” turbo cancer is REAL.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses a claim that Pfizer plasmid DNA fragments were found inside an “extremely rare and aggressive heart cancer.” It states that the DNA included three spike protein–encoding segments and the “origin of replication” sequence on the plasmid. The transcript then links these plasmids to the manufacturing process, saying that the plasmids are “used at the manufacturing plant to make the mRNA” and that “they don’t take it out of the vials like they claim,” asserting that the plasmid DNA remains in the vials. The transcript describes the person’s condition as having “appeared to have reached his heart,” and it claims that “this vaccine and this DNA must have integrated into some cardiac cells leading to this extreme cancer.” It states that the individual received two Pfizer shots, and that both were “E batches.” The transcript further asserts that “E batches were the most lethal batches.” It then says that “a few months later,” they found “a giant Cardiac sarcoma,” and that the cancer also “spread to his brain.” According to the transcript, the growth rate of the cancer is described using the “doubling time,” which is given as “ten days.” It says that this meant “every ten days, the tumor would double in size,” characterizing the condition as “literally called a turbo cancer,” and stating that this is “the exact definition.” The transcript emphasizes that the “DNA is in there” and calls this the “smoking gun,” implying that the presence of the DNA fragments in the tumor serves as the key evidence. The transcript also includes a description of the grieving mother. It says that she is “absolutely heartbroken,” and refers to her as the “grieving mother,” stating that her “thirty-five year old son was killed by Pfizer.” It repeats the idea that “killed” is attributed to Pfizer and frames the DNA evidence as central to the narrative. The transcript then says the mother has “no compensation,” and that she is “left without a son.”
Full Transcript
Pfizer plasmid DNA fragments inside of this extremely rare and aggressive heart cancer, including three spike protein encoding segments of the DNA and what's called the origin of replication sequence on the plasmid. Again, the plasmids what's used at the manufacturing plant to make the mRNA. They don't take it out of the vials like they claim, it's still in there, and so this appeared To have reached his heart, the vaccine and this DNA must have integrated into some cardiac cells leading to this extreme cancer. He took two Pfizer shots, they were both E batches. E batches were the most lethal batches. A few months later, they found a giant Cardiac sarcoma. It also spread to his brain. The growth rate of this cancer, the doubling time it's called, was ten days. So every ten days, the tumor would double in size. This is what is literally called a turbo cancer. It's the exact definition. The, the grieving mother, I mean, she is absolutely heartbroken. Her thirty-five year old son was killed by Pfizer, right? Killed The DNA is in there, the smoking gun is in there, and she's got no compensation. She's left without a son
Saved - August 31, 2026 at 8:13 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

We published the LARGEST COVID “vaccine” autopsy study ever conducted and found 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the shot. Three independent analyses show that COVID shots killed more Americans than WWI, WWII, Vietnam, and Iraq COMBINED. https://t.co/VpWDZkvfVC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that 73.9% of “those deaths” were from the vaccine. They say they conducted a systematic review of 325 peer-reviewed autopsy cases, and that they “looked at all of them” and “adjudicated all of them” to determine whether each death was from the vaccine or not. The speaker then asserts that the results were “unfortunately” that these deaths are deadly, and that an FDA Class I recall “should have happened years ago.” They further claim that the recall “exceeded past vaccine withdrawal limits by like hundreds of thousands of percent.” The speaker also provides a range for COVID-19 vaccine deaths, stating that it ranges from about 470,000 from Pfizer alone up to 840,000 American deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines. They frame these figures as “percent COVID-19 vaccine deaths” and emphasize the magnitude of the numbers. The speaker concludes by asking the audience to remember that the claimed death toll “is rivalling the American soldier death toll of World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and the Iraq War combined.”
Full Transcript
We found that 73.9% of those deaths were from the vaccine. We did do a systematic review of 325 peer-reviewed autopsy cases. We looked at all of them, adjudicated all of them, were they from the vaccine or not? Unfortunately, yes, they are deadly. FDA Class I recall should have happened years ago. It exceeded past vaccine withdrawal limits by like hundreds of thousands of percent. percent COVID-19 vaccine deaths, it ranges from about four hundred and seventy thousand from Pfizer alone up to eight hundred and forty thousand American deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines. We have to remember that, that is rivalling the American soldier death toll of World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and the Iraq War combined.
Saved - August 27, 2026 at 12:38 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Google is preparing to launch one of the LARGEST open-air biological experiments in American HISTORY by releasing 64 MILLION bacteria-infected mosquitoes into Florida and California. The EPA needs to REJECT Google's EXPERIMENTAL USE PERMIT. https://t.co/vQBxyzxXUd

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that Google should focus on web browsers and AI rather than releasing mosquitoes through what they describe as one of the largest open-air biological experiments in U.S. history. They claim Google plans to release 64 million mosquitoes into California and Florida, and that this could cause irreversible ecological disruptions. The speaker states that eliminating an entire mosquito species or suppressing it severely could allow other invasive species to fill the ecological role. They also say removing mosquitoes disrupts food chains because birds, bats, frogs, and other animals eat mosquitoes, leading to “less food” for those species. They claim this could “screw things up” across the ecosystem. They further claim Google already tried mosquito suppression in Fresno in 2018. According to the speaker, mosquitoes were suppressed, but after Google stopped, all the mosquitoes returned. The speaker concludes that the proposal amounts to a recurring approach, characterizing it as Google wanting to put people on a subscription service for mosquito releasing.
Full Transcript
Google should stick to web browsers and AI instead of conducting one of the largest open-air biological experiments in US history to release, it's actually 64 million mosquitoes into California and Florida, which could result in irreversible ecological system disruptions. If you eliminate an entire or suppress severely an entire species of mosquito, you could have other invasive species fill That role, and you'll also disrupt the food, food chain in the ecosystem because birds, bats frogs, they all eat mosquitoes, so they're gonna have less food there. That could disrupt that, screw things up there. as well as Google actually tried this in Fresno in twenty eighteen. It did suppress the mosquitoes, but once they stopped, all the mosquitoes came back. So basically, Google wants to put people on a subscription service of mosquito releasing. You can't make This up
Saved - August 21, 2026 at 1:25 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

BREAKING: FDA DATA REANALYSIS SENT TO SECRETARY KENNEDY FINDS MODERNA’S mRNA FLU SHOT APPROVAL SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY WITHDRAWN We directly reanalyzed the FDA’s own data used to approve mFLUSIVA and found an EXTREME risk-benefit profile that is impossible to justify. To prevent just ONE influenza hospitalization, 5,017 people had to be vaccinated at the COST of: ~2 excess unexplained DEATHS ~278 disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions ~3,798 adverse reactions Compared with the standard-dose flu vaccine, that amounts to approximately 1,454 ADDITIONAL adverse reactions and 233 ADDITIONAL disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions for every hospitalization prevented. Unexplained deaths were 2.55× more frequent among mFLUSIVA recipients, while disabling Grade 3 systemic reactions were 6.15× more frequent than with the standard-dose flu vaccine. Literally EVERY SINGLE solicited adverse event was more frequent in the mFLUSIVA group. Neither pivotal trial included a placebo arm, and no influenza-mortality endpoint was ever measured. Moreover, mFLUSIVA commits recipients to annual lifelong exposure to nucleoside-modified mRNA technology despite evidence of residual DNA contamination, genomic integration, protein misfolding, proteostatic collapse, body-wide biodistribution, years-long persistence, and compounded biological injury with repeated dosing. Our study and accompanying information were sent directly to Secretary Kennedy and officials at HHS, FDA, CDC, and NIH. We hope Secretary Kennedy and federal health officials make the life-saving decision to remove this extremely hazardous product from the market before widespread administration begins. In light of the evidence now before them, allowing mFLUSIVA to remain approved would be a grave mistake. The government has been given the data. It now has the responsibility to ACT. @SecKennedy

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Plans are now underway to have the FDA withdraw its disastrous mRNA flu shot approval. They will not be able to defend the damning data about to drop. Stay tuned.

Saved - August 12, 2026 at 12:39 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Bill Gates literally just funded the first-ever use of artificial intelligence to create 16 synthetic viruses capable of replicating. I guess bioterrorism is normal now… https://t.co/osVDwqi632

Saved - August 11, 2026 at 2:33 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The USDA approved experimental self-amplifying RNA injections for our dogs & cats: Merck’s Nobivac NXT Pet owners have NO IDEA their veterinarian is injecting their pets with lethal saRNA shots for rabies, flu, AND FeLV. This needs to be STOPPED. https://t.co/b7PJ8s2PVA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The main concern raised is that self-amplifying mRNA injections are being rolled out for pets that are already part of earlier vaccine releases. The speaker says that last year the self-amplifying mRNA vaccines were introduced and that this rollout is now being applied to dogs and cats. The transcript specifies that the self-amplifying mRNA vaccines are for flu, rabies, and feline leukemia virus. The speaker states that these injections are actively being given to dogs. They also claim that veterinarians will not tell owners that the products are self-amplifying, and they advise pet owners to pay attention to what is being administered. The speaker identifies the product as Nobivac NXT, developed by Merck, and emphasizes that it is self-amplifying. The instruction given is that if a person goes to the vet, they should make sure their pets are not getting “Novavax, Nxt,” and should not receive Nobivac NXT. The transcript then describes the speaker’s stated fears about what the injections could do after administration. The speaker claims that the pets would become “self-amplifying RNA particle factories.” They further state that this could “probably shed onto the human owners,” and that the material could “recombine with wild viruses.” The speaker adds that such recombination could lead to “chimeric mutant viruses” and says that people “don’t know what those can do.” Overall, the transcript presents this situation as very serious, centers on the self-amplifying nature of Nobivac NXT, and urges pet owners to confirm what vaccine formulation is being used when visiting a veterinarian, specifically to ensure pets do not receive Nobivac NXT (described as self-amplifying mRNA).
Full Transcript
What I'm most concerned about is that now they're rolling out the self-amplifying mRNA injections for the dogs and cats they already have rolled it out last year. It's for flu, rabies, and feline leukemia virus. And so these are actively being injected in the dogs. The vets, they won't even tell you that these are self-amplifying. It's called Nobivac NXT, developed by Merck. So if you go to the vet, make sure Sure, they're not getting Novavax, Nxt, they will become self-amplifying RNA particle factories, and this can probably shed onto the human owners, and it can recombine with wild viruses and cause chimeric mutant viruses that we don't know what those can do. So be careful, that's a, it's a very serious situation.
Saved - June 26, 2026 at 10:44 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

BREAKING: The Supreme Court just DERAILED THOUSANDS of lawsuits against Monsanto for glyphosate causing cancer. In a 7-2 ruling, they sided with Monsanto and BLOCKED cancer victims from suing over missing cancer warnings. This is a GRAVE MISTAKE. Two recent studies found that glyphosate causes 10+ fatal cancers in rats at “safe” doses and has invaded ~90% of Americans’ bodies. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Supreme Court ruled seven to two in favor of Monsanto regarding lawsuits tied to glyphosate, a weed killer alleged to cause cancer. The ruling applies under state law, preventing plaintiffs from suing for omitted cancer risks on labeling when the label does not state that glyphosate has a cancer risk. The transcript characterizes the decision as derailing thousands of lawsuits brought by individuals who developed cancer. The transcript states that the Supreme Court also relied on the position that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) says glyphosate is not carcinogenic. It claims this means “it doesn’t matter,” and the Court will eliminate related cases. The transcript cites additional evidence, saying multiple studies indicate cancer risk. It mentions a newly published rat study where rats were exposed to glyphosate at “safe” levels, and the study found over 10 cancers in the rats, with tumors everywhere. It also says human epidemiological studies show increased cancer risks after exposure to glyphosate. The transcript further claims that the study regulators relied upon to argue glyphosate does not cause cancer was retracted a few months earlier because it was ghostwritten by Monsanto staff and used fake data. It asserts that the safety narrative for glyphosate was “built on a fraud.” As a result, the transcript says individuals who suffered cancer from glyphosate are “screwed” under the Supreme Court ruling. It calls glyphosate a serious public health risk and states that it has invaded over 90% of Americans’ bodies. The transcript says Congress should take action to ameliorate the situation and argues Monsanto and Bayer must be held accountable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Supreme Court just sided with Monsanto and their cancer-causing weed killer glyphosate that has already invaded over 90% of Americans' bodies. And this is going to derail thousands of lawsuits against Monsanto for individuals who developed cancer. The Supreme Court ruled seven to two, basically that under state law, you can't sue them for omitting cancer risks on their labeling because they don't say it has a cancer risk. And so people were suing them. And so now the Supreme Court is claiming that the EPA says it's not carcinogenic. So therefore, you know, it doesn't matter. And we're just going to derail all these lawsuits because there's nothing to see here. But it's all BS. We have multiple studies now. One in rats just came out. They exposed the rats to safe levels of glyphosate, so-called safe. It caused over 10 cancers in the rats. They had tumors everywhere. Human epidemiological studies show increased cancer risks when exposed to glyphosate. And the study that regulators relied on to claim glyphosate doesn't cause cancer was just retracted a few months ago because it was ghostwritten by Monsanto staff and used fake data. And so the entire safety narrative of glyphosate was built on a fraud. And now all of the lawsuits, all of the individuals that have suffered cancer from this dangerous weed killer that's literally everywhere are screwed. And so hopefully Congress can take some action and ameliorate this. This is a very serious public health risk. And Monsanto and Bayer, they have to be held accountable for this. They can't be poisoning the entire population here, given it's in 90% of our bodies. This is absolutely ridiculous.

@scotus_wire - SCOTUS Wire

🚨 In a 7-2 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that Missouri can’t require Monsanto to add a cancer warning to Roundup because federal law already requires Monsanto to use the EPA‑approved label, and the EPA has repeatedly found no cancer risk from glyphosate. https://t.co/lzLGWQCKgH

Saved - June 18, 2026 at 10:18 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m seeing claims that the Gates Foundation developed “MARK OF THE BEAST” microneedle implants that permanently install quantum dot markings and mRNA into your body, to be used as a biological “vaccine” passport controlling who can shop, dine, or travel.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The Gates Foundation just developed “MARK OF THE BEAST” microneedle implants that install PERMANENT quantum dot markings AND mRNA into your body. Planned for deployment during the next plandemic — a biological "vaccine" passport controlling who can shop, dine, or travel. https://t.co/wgMPUfmDlx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says it is “a literal QR code” that will be used to create a “biological vaccine passport system” in which people “won’t use your phone” to enter stores or travel. Instead, the system would use a wrist-based implant: material embedded in the body. Speaker 0 describes the technology as a “very dangerous vaccine platform” meant for wide-scale rollout. They say it was first developed and funded by Gates in 2019 through a study of “quantum dot implants,” described as “a micro needle patch array.” The patch is said to be “like a bandaid,” applied to the wrist; it “dissolves” and “installs these quantum dot materials that last for at least five years.” Speaker 0 then claims that in 2025 Gates funded another study showing how advanced the technology has become. They say the micro-needle patches can install “literal quantum dot qr codes” that can be “read with ai” using specialized cameras. They add that the decoded information could include “store batch information [and] lot number,” as well as “how many doses you receive.” Speaker 0 concludes that this system is planned for “manual wide scale deployment for another pandemic,” and that the QR-code-related system “lasts… for years, perhaps permanently.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a literal QR code. You will be marked. This lasts, again, for years, perhaps permanently. And this will be used as a biological vaccine passport system where you won't use your phone. You won't use the QR code on your phone to enter the store and travel. You will use your wrist where this material is embedded in your body. And so this is a very dangerous vaccine platform that they try and roll out at a wide scale. So first in 2019, Gates funded a study for the original development of these quantum dot implants. So it's a micro needle patch array. So it's got a bunch of mini needles. It's like a bandaid. You put it on your wrist, it dissolves and it installs these quantum dot materials that last for at least five years. So they developed that in 2019. Now in 2025, gates funded another study that shows just how advanced now this technology has become it is advancing at a very fast pace now these these micro needle patches and can install literal quantum dot qr codes qr codes that can be read with ai with specialized cameras and decoded to store batch information lot number how many doses you receive this is planned for manual wide scale deployment for another pandemic.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

New Gates-Funded Microneedle Patch Implant Installs Both mRNA and Quantum Dot Markings Into the Body: https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-gates-funded-microneedle-patch

Saved - June 16, 2026 at 3:04 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’ve learned that Minnesota (HF 3219), Tennessee (SB 1949), and Arizona (HB 2974) have introduced legislation classifying COVID-19 mRNA injections as weapons of mass destruction. I also see claims supported by other legislators and international bodies, plus a peer-reviewed study, that the FDA covered up the largest biomedical catastrophe in history. Criminal prosecutions are urged.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

THREE U.S. STATES INTRODUCED LEGISLATION CLASSIFYING COVID-19 mRNA INJECTIONS AS BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION 1. Minnesota Bill HF 3219 2. Tennessee Bill SB1949 3. Arizona Bill HB 2974 This is because mRNA shots have killed, injured, and disabled more people than 100+ Hiroshima nuclear attacks.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three U.S. states have introduced legislation classifying and designating mRNA injections as biological agents and weapons of mass destruction. The states named are Minnesota (last year), Arizona (a few weeks ago), and Tennessee (just yesterday). The speaker says this is not the end of the developments, citing multiple international and organizational declarations. The Alliance of Indigenous Nations, described as an international governing body recognized by Canada on a nation-to-nation basis, declared the injections to be biological and technological weapons of mass destruction a few months earlier. The speaker also points to a peer-reviewed paper in the *Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons* identifying that the injections contain components that violate the Biological Weapons Convention. In addition, the World Council for Health is cited as having declared the shots to be biological weapons. The speaker concludes that, as these declarations accumulate, it is only a matter of time before the injections are outlawed. Regarding Arizona, the speaker says that if the bill goes through, possessing, distributing, or manufacturing these shots would constitute terrorism-related charges and life imprisonment. The speaker further asserts that the shots have killed, injured, and disabled millions of people worldwide, comparing their impact to “hundreds of Hiroshima nuclear attacks.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Three U.S. states have introduced legislation classifying and designating the mRNA injections as biological agents and weapons of mass destruction. The states include Minnesota was last year, and then a few weeks ago was Arizona, and then just yesterday was Tennessee. That's not the end of these developments. We have to remember the Alliance of Indigenous Nations which is an international governing body recognized by Canada on a nation-to-nation basis, they also declared these injections as biological and technological weapons of mass destruction a few months ago. And so we have that, and then we have a peer-reviewed paper in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons where we identify that these injections have components within them that violate the Biological Weapons Convention. And then we also have the World Council for Health. They have declared these shots as biological weapons. And so as all of these declarations mount, it's only a matter of time before these injections become outlawed. And yeah, you mentioned in Arizona, terrorism, yeah. If that bill goes through, possessing, distributing, or manufacturing these shots will constitute terrorism-related charges and life imprisonment. And rightfully so, given that these shots have killed, injured, and disabled millions upon millions of people across the globe, rivaling hundreds of Hiroshima nuclear attacks.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

COVID SHOTS KILLED MORE AMERICANS THAN WORLD WAR I, WORLD WAR II, THE VIETNAM WAR, AND THE IRAQ WAR COMBINED We now have internal documents proving the FDA COVERED-UP the LARGEST biomedical catastrophe in history. Criminal prosecutions are urgently warranted.

Video Transcript AI Summary
American COVID-19 vaccine deaths are described as ranging from about 470,000 from Pfizer alone up to 840,000 American deaths from COVID-19 vaccines. It is further stated that this death toll rivals the combined American soldier death toll of World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and the Iraq War.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: American COVID-19 vaccine deaths. It ranges from about 470,000 from Pfizer alone up to 840,000 American deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines. We have to remember that that is rivaling the American soldier death toll of World War I, World War II, Vietnam, and the Iraq War combined.

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

This is a scandal WAY bigger than Watergate. @CNN, @MSNOWNews, @NBCNews, @ABC, @PBS — it's past time to cover this. People died from the COVID shot because the government lied to them, yet the legacy media refuses to report on this story.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 asks what justice looks like and what the next steps should be for families affected. Speaker 0 says the first step is to “expose it,” thanking News Nation for covering the issue. He contrasts this with what he describes as a lack of coverage from major networks such as ABC, NBC, PBS, CNN, and only one interview on CBS’ streaming service with Major Garrett. He calls it “the biggest government scandal” of his lifetime, stating that people died because they were not given information and that people were permanently disabled because the government withheld information the American people had a right to know. He says he is not giving up, will begin interviewing those affected, and that those responsible “better not lie” as they work to uncover what he calls the entire plot. Speaker 1 asks whether Speaker 0 believes it is bigger than the biggest scandal of his time and bigger than Watergate. Speaker 0 responds that, unlike Watergate, “nobody died” in Watergate, while he claims “tens of thousands of people died after March 1st” from what he calls a “COVID injection.” He adds that children died and parents were convinced by “these lies” to give the injection to their children so it wouldn’t infect their grandchildren. He says they now know the injection didn’t prevent transmission, and he argues that the lies must be revealed and the people behind them must be exposed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 1: What does justice look like? What's next steps for you and all these families who have been affected by this? Speaker 0: First of all, we need to expose it. Listen, I appreciate News Nation covering this. The major networks, you know, ABC, NBC, PBS, CNN. CBS had Major Garrett do one interview with me on their streaming service, but it is just radio silence. I mean, this is the biggest government scandal of my lifetime because people died because they weren't given this information. They were permanently disabled because the government withheld information the American people had a right to know. So I appreciate you covering this. Stay tuned. I'm not giving up on this. We're going to start interviewing these people. They better not lie to us. We're going to uncover this entire plot. Speaker 1: You think this is bigger than the biggest scandal of your time, bigger than Watergate? Speaker 0: I mean, nobody died in Watergate. Tens of thousands of people died after March 1st from that COVID injection. Children died. Parents were convinced by these lies to give the injection to their children so it wouldn't infect their grandchildren. Now we know the injection didn't prevent transmission. So the lies told, we need to reveal those lies and these people need to be exposed.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

There are now multiple legislators, international bodies, and peer-reviewed scientific publications declaring that mRNA injections constitute biological or technological weapons of mass destruction: - Tennessee Bill SB1949 (Sen. Janice Bowling): https://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default?BillNumber=SB1949&GA=114 - Arizona Bill HB 2974 (Rep. Rachel Keshel): https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/57leg/2R/bills/HB2974P.pdf - Minnesota Bill HF 3219 (Rep. Shane Mekeland): https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bills/94/2025/0/HF/3219/versions/0/ - Alliance of Indigenous Nations (recognized by Canada on a Nation-to-Nation basis): https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-worlds-first-international - Our peer-reviewed study in the American Journal of Physicians and Surgeons: https://jpands.org/vol30no3/zywiec.pdf It’s only a matter of time before these dangerous products are outlawed.

Saved - June 7, 2026 at 7:02 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m alleging the CDC is being sued under federal law for running an illegal 72-dose childhood vaccination program without ever testing cumulative safety or filing required safety reports. The lawsuit claims violations of the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment due process and bodily integrity, and the Administrative Procedure Act for arbitrary, capricious rulemaking—potentially dismantling the regime.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

CDC SLAMMED WITH FEDERAL LAWSUIT FOR OPERATING ILLEGAL 72-DOSE CHILDHOOD VACCINATION PROGRAM NEVER tested for cumulative safety. NEVER filed the legally-required safety reports. This lawsuit could DISMANTLE the CDC’s unlawful vaccine regime that has poisoned the nation.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The lawsuit charges the CDC with violating the First Amendment (silencing dissenting doctors), the Fifth Amendment (due process & bodily integrity), and the Administrative Procedure Act (arbitrary and capricious rulemaking): https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-cdc-sued-for-pushing-illegal

Saved - May 31, 2026 at 12:24 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Google is preparing to release 64 MILLION bacteria-infected mosquitoes into the wild. We’re on the wrong timeline again... https://t.co/UmmG34NWGl

@JonMFleetwood - Jon Fleetwood

Google to Release 64 Million Bacteria-Infected Mosquitoes Across California and Florida Over the Next Two Years EPA accepting public comments through June 5. https://t.co/vU14tsL3wn

Saved - May 28, 2026 at 12:09 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Tick-borne alpha-gal syndrome skyrocketed 10,000% as Bill Gates spent $7.6 MILLION creating genetically modified ticks designed to SPREAD in the wild. The FBI must investigate all possible bioterror-related activities behind this MAJOR surge in tick-induced meat allergies. https://t.co/Synhq5wrji

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

JOE ROGAN: “The tick thing is nuts...” TIM BURCHETT: “Because of Bill Gates.” ROGAN: “Farmers and ranchers are finding boxes of ticks on their property. I have a good friend who got bit by the Lone Star tick and has that alpha-gal problem... It makes your body allergic to red meat.” BURCHETT: “And who has got genetically made meat now?” ROGAN: "Bill Gates?" BURCHETT: "Bill Gates."

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Bill Gates has already spent more than $7.6 MILLION creating genetically modified ticks designed to SPREAD in the wild. In 2023, the Gates Foundation awarded Flyttr the cash to “initiate development of a self-limiting tick” designed to spread and control cattle ticks. https://t.co/92U29bnbPu

Saved - May 25, 2026 at 5:23 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I see alarm in “350 million people” across three countries and multiple datasets: U.S. SEER shows a +6.4% early-onset cancer surge since 2021; U.S. CDC WONDER shows about 138,000 excess cancer deaths since 2021; South Korea reports higher risks of six major cancers for vaccinated people; Italy reports higher risks of three major cancers. I call for criminal prosecution.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

350 MILLION PEOPLE. THREE countries. FOUR independent datasets.... COVID SHOTS UNLEASHED A TURBO CANCER EPIDEMIC 🇺🇸 U.S. GOVERNMENT SEER CANCER DATA: +6.4% early-onset cancer surge since 2021 🇺🇸 U.S. CDC WONDER MORTALITY DATA: 138,000 excess cancer deaths since 2021 🇰🇷 SOUTH KOREA VAXXED VS. UNVAXXED STUDY: Vaccinated individuals face higher risks of 6 major cancers. 🇮🇹 ITALY VAXXED VS. UNVAXXED STUDY: Vaccinated individuals face higher risks of 3 major cancers. It's time for those responsible to face CRIMINAL PROSECUTION.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The global population will unfortunately pay the price for years to come thanks to Pfizer, Moderna, and world governments: 🇺🇸 U.S. SEER: https://thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-us-government-cancer-data 🇺🇸 CDC WONDER: https://theethicalskeptic.com/2026/03/13/the-state-of-things-pandemic/ 🇰🇷 SOUTH KOREA: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12465339/ 🇮🇹 ITALY: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12381369/ https://t.co/4q7k7H9PIX

Saved - May 21, 2026 at 5:10 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

JOE ROGAN: “The tick thing is nuts...” TIM BURCHETT: “Because of Bill Gates.” ROGAN: “Farmers and ranchers are finding boxes of ticks on their property. I have a good friend who got bit by the Lone Star tick and has that alpha-gal problem... It makes your body allergic to red meat.” BURCHETT: “And who has got genetically made meat now?” ROGAN: "Bill Gates?" BURCHETT: "Bill Gates."

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Bill Gates has already spent more than $7.6 MILLION creating genetically modified ticks designed to SPREAD in the wild. In 2023, the Gates Foundation awarded Flyttr the cash to “initiate development of a self-limiting tick” designed to spread and control cattle ticks. https://t.co/DaZ8KojrjD

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

PEER-REVIEWED PAPER SAYS GENETICALLY ENGINEERING TICKS TO SPREAD MEAT ALLERGIES IS “MORALLY OBLIGATORY” Western Michigan professors claim that CRISPR-edited ticks should be used to spread alpha-gal syndrome as “moral bioenhancement” to FORCE humans away from eating meat. This https://t.co/ooKiwMYHXz

Saved - May 21, 2026 at 3:46 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

ORACLE'S LARRY ELLISON: “Citizens will be on their best behavior” with AI surveillance systems "We're constantly recording and reporting everything that's going on." "It's unimpeachable." Welcome to the dystopian AI surveillance state. https://t.co/1Hh2y0ToYm

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

REMINDER: The White House announced “The Stargate Project” where Larry Ellison pushed "personalized" AI mRNA cancer shots developed within 48 hours. MAHA was already infiltrated by mRNA transhumanists on Day 2 of the Trump Administration. https://t.co/5apTaZtzSD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker proposes a future approach to cancer treatment: designing a vaccine for each individual person to vaccinate them against their specific cancer. They say this personalized mRNA vaccine could be produced robotically using AI in about 48 hours. The concept includes early cancer detection, followed by developing a cancer vaccine tailored to the person’s particular cancer, with the vaccine becoming available within 48 hours. The speaker frames this as the promise of AI and the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer. And you can make that vaccine, that mRNA vaccine, you can make that robotically, again using AI, in about forty eight hours. So imagine early cancer detection, the development of a cancer vaccine for your particular cancer aimed at you, and have that vaccine available in forty eight hours. This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future.

@Docjohnc - BeyondBio / John Catanzaro

‼️The Genetic Gamble‼️ The next generation of medicine is being sold as “precision healthcare” — personalized mRNA vaccines, self-amplifying RNA (saRNA), DNA therapeutics, programmable lipid nanoparticles, and AI-designed nucleotide constructs. But beneath the marketing

Saved - May 16, 2026 at 12:12 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨CDC Data Suggests mRNA Shots SEVERELY Harm Future Generations Years after mass vaccination of childbearing women, babies born are now dying at a 77% excess rate. This is a catastrophic generational crisis — one that was expected with experimental gene transfer technology.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: CDC Child Death Records Indicate CATASTROPHIC Transgenerational Harm of Mass mRNA "Vaccination" A new analysis of CDC data by @EthicalSkeptic shows children born following mass mRNA vaccination of mothers are dying at a 77% excess rate ⬇️ 📈30-year decline in infant/child mortality reversed in 2021 ⚠️Transgenerational effect: sustained excess mortality in children never infected or injected ⚠️Teratogenic signal: deaths rose among infants exposed in utero ⚠️17,975 excess deaths (ages 0–4) since rollout ⚠️ Excess death causes align closely with those observed in vaccinated adults, suggesting the same mechanisms may now carry across generations. The implications extend FAR beyond the current generation. If validated, this would represent a public health crisis of historic magnitude—one not only for those who took the injections, but for the children and grandchildren who never consented to the risks.

@EthicalSkeptic - Ethical Skeptic ☀

🚨Those children born of past-vaccination mothers, despite never having been vaccinated themselves, and despite never having had Covid... are dying now at 77% excess - a 24 sigma event.

Saved - May 12, 2026 at 11:15 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Official documents confirm that FDA officials knew in 2021 that COVID shots were linked to SUDDEN DEATHS yet chose to COVER IT UP. CRIMINAL actions by our top public health regulators have resulted in MILLIONS of deaths, injuries, and permanent disabilities. https://t.co/DdJNTCwhaj

Saved - May 11, 2026 at 6:55 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that vaccinated children showed 54% higher cancer rates in the largest vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated birth cohort study, and a post cites President Trump opposing universal vaccine mandates. I also note a peer‑reviewed reanalysis of the Henry Ford Birth Cohort claiming vaccinated children are sicker across 22 chronic disease categories in the same discussion.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

We found vaccinated children suffered 54% HIGHER CANCER RATES in the LARGEST vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated birth cohort study ever conducted. https://t.co/8xFcqZPJbX

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP DROPS TRUTH: We need to STOP pumping babies full of endless vaccines “I believe in vaccines, but I don't believe that you have to have a mandate for all of them... I look at these beautiful little babies, and they get a vat — like a big glass of stuff — pumped into their bodies, and I think it's a very negative thing!” @RapidResponse47 Important for MAHA 🇺🇸

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses a nuanced view on vaccines, stating a belief in their importance while opposing mandatory vaccination for all vaccines. They highlight the polio vaccine as amazing and credited with wiping out the disease, illustrating support for vaccines in general but not for compulsory mandates. They point out that there are about 88 vaccines, suggesting that some could be cut back or administered in smaller quantities. The speaker contrasts the high number with examples from other countries, noting Denmark and others have significantly fewer vaccines (12, 14, or up to 17). They emphasize their own preference for reducing the vaccine load. A vivid image is used: babies receiving “a vat” or “a big glass of stuff pumped into their bodies,” which the speaker characterizes as a negative thing. This leads to the expressed desire for a different approach, namely much smaller shots and fewer visits to the doctor. The speaker proposes that with fewer vaccinations and fewer medical visits, outcomes could be improved. They specifically mention four doctor visits as a desired target, implying that this reduction could lead to better health results. Finally, the speaker links this approach to autism, stating the belief that the proposed changes—smaller shots and fewer visits—would yield a much better result with autism. The remarks indicate a direct connection between the vaccination approach described and autism outcomes, presented as a conclusion of their viewpoint. Overall, the transcript captures a stance that supports vaccines in principle and acknowledges their success (polio), but argues against mandatory universal vaccination and for a substantially reduced vaccine schedule and medical visits, with an asserted positive impact on autism outcomes. The speaker compares U.S. vaccination totals to those of Denmark and other countries to underscore the perceived excess, advocating for smaller, fewer-dose regimens administered over fewer clinical visits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe in vaccines, but I don't believe that, you know, you have to have a mandate for all of them. The polio vaccine's amazing. It's, you know, wiped it out. And I believe in vaccines, but, you know, I think we're up to 88 vaccines. And I really feel that vaccines, if they were given in smaller quantities, they wanna cut some out and that's good too. And I agree with that. 82 is so many. If you look at Denmark and other countries, you have twelve, fourteen, I think 17. And we have, like, 82. But I look at these beautiful little babies and they get a vat. I mean, so like a big glass of of stuff pumped into their bodies. And I think it's a very negative thing to do. And I would like to see it. I'm not doing this in terms of Bobby or not. I hope they agree with that, but that's just my opinion. I would love to see much smaller shots, like four visits to the doctor. And I think you would have a much better result with the autism.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Our Peer-Reviewed Reanalysis of the Henry Ford Birth Cohort Study Finds Vaccinated Children Sicker Across All 22 Chronic Disease Categories: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/125 https://t.co/Chz4WdXYQm

Saved - May 10, 2026 at 10:34 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that a study found only 14% of PCR “COVID cases” in the early pandemic were real, meaning 86% were not; and that lockdowns and vaccine mandates were built on fraudulent testing, with calls to prosecute those who used fake tests.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

STUDY FINDS 86% OF PCR-POSITIVE “COVID CASES” WERE NOT REAL INFECTIONS Vaccine mandates, fear campaigns, and lockdowns were built on a FRAUDULENT testing illusion. Time to prosecute those who used fake tests to manufacture panic, destroy livelihoods, and force gene therapy.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

New study finds that during the early pandemic period, only 14% of PCR “COVID cases” were real — proving that lockdowns and vaccine mandates were built on a fraudulent testing illusion. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-86-of-pcr-positive-covid

Saved - May 7, 2026 at 4:51 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I note that the US Army ran a clinical trial with an Andes hantavirus DNA gene-therapy injection—the same strain linked to the cruise ship outbreak—with 98% adverse events and the DNA plasmid created at Fort Detrick BSL-4. The referenced post claims 13 hantavirus vaccines/gene therapies (6 DNA, 3 mRNA, 2 viral vectors, 1 inactivated, 1 protein). I will NOT take any of them. I will NOT take this gene therapy under any circumstances.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The US Army already ran a clinical trial with an Andes strain hantavirus DNA gene-therapy injection — the exact same strain behind the cruise ship outbreak. 98% of participants suffered adverse events. The DNA plasmid was created at the Fort Detrick BSL-4 army lab. https://t.co/XzEOQVTg33

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

VACCINE CARTEL AND US ARMY ARE DEVELOPING 13 HANTAVIRUS VACCINES & GENE THERAPIES 6 DNA "vaccines" (US Army) 3 mRNA "vaccines" (Moderna, China, Canada) 2 viral vector "vaccines" (UK, Canada) 1 inactivated (licensed in Korea) 1 protein subunit I will NOT be taking any of them

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

You’ll never guess who has been working on an mRNA hantavirus vaccine…

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

I will NOT take this gene therapy under any circumstances. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/229/1/30/7209758

Saved - May 5, 2026 at 2:13 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

FAUCI CAUGHT ON TAPE: "When you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological BS and they get VACCINATED." "You want to come to this college, buddy? You're going to get VACCINATED." ONE WEEK LEFT TO PROSECUTE HIM. The decision should be EASY. https://t.co/mPZPSY28Ps

@RandPaul - Rand Paul

The DOJ has ONE WEEK left to charge Anthony Fauci for the worst cover-up in modern medical history. He lied to Congress about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. Millions died. Trillions were spent. And Fauci walked away with book deals and fawning media coverage instead of handcuffs. I re-upped my criminal referral to the DOJ because the evidence is overwhelming, and justice has been delayed long enough. RT if you’re ready to see Fauci behind bars.

Saved - April 29, 2026 at 11:18 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that FDA officials hid safety signals for COVID-19 vaccine injuries—sudden cardiac death, heart attacks, clots, neurological damage, and dementia. The senior FDA medical officer who uncovered them was ordered to “cease and desist,” and her improved VAERS analysis system was shut down. FDA leadership called the work a major distraction, burying the findings and blocking a clearer warning signal.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

FDA officials COVERED UP 25 COVID shot safety signals, including SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH, HEART ATTACKS, BLOOD CLOTS, NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE, and DEMENTIA. The senior FDA medical officer who uncovered them was ordered to “CEASE AND DESIST.” FDA leadership called her work a “major distraction.” Dr. Ana Szarfman developed a superior VAERS analysis system that fixed “masking”… but they SHUT HER DOWN and BURIED IT.

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

Today, I released a report showing that Biden health officials knew that safety signals for COVID-19 injection injuries were being hidden by their VAERS analytic algorithm. They were shown an updated algorithm that signaled serious adverse events, but they refused to use it. Their cover-up jeopardized the health of millions of Americans. Read my interim report and see the records here:

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

FDA’s own data flagged sudden cardiac death, heart attacks, blood clots, neurological damage, and dementia… and the FDA analyst uncovering it was ordered to “cease and desist.” https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-senate-investigation-finds-f15

Saved - April 21, 2026 at 5:27 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report a 1950s CIA-classified study showing anti-parasitics disrupt cancer growth, buried for over 50 years and delaying vital research. The linked largest human ivermectin/mebendazole cancer study shows 84.4% cancer disappearance, tumor shrinkage, or stabilization. Declassified study.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The CIA CLASSIFIED a 1950s study showing anti-parasitics disrupt cancer growth—and kept it BURIED for over HALF A CENTURY. Millions of cancer victims have paid the price as this vital line of research was set back DECADES. https://t.co/GFAf6LVNds

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The single LARGEST human study of ivermectin and mebendazole in cancer patients found that the VAST MAJORITY (84.4%) declared CANCER DISAPPEARANCE, TUMOR SHRINKAGE, or CANCER STABILIZATION. https://t.co/PvxcTzMURU

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🔥Dr. John Campbell SHOCKED after reading our ivermectin cancer study: “We could be CURING, potentially … your wife’s cancer, your husband’s cancer, your mother’s cancer, your father’s cancer, your son’s cancer, your daughter’s cancer, with ivermectin and mebendazole.” https://t.co/QfY65Hxire

Saved - April 10, 2026 at 1:05 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I note that farmed fish you eat are routinely sedated and mass vaccinated with over 50 vaccines. Hundreds of millions of salmon, trout, and sea bass are injected with automated vaccination machines or immersed in vaccine baths each year. mRNA versions are coming soon.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The farmed fish you eat are routinely sedated and mass vaccinated using over 50 different vaccines. HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of salmon, trout, and sea bass are injected with automated vaccination machines or immersed in vaccine baths every year. mRNA versions are coming soon... https://t.co/ZXhR6unAox

Saved - April 10, 2026 at 12:54 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I note that the largest COVID vaccine autopsy study says 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the shot, with three independent estimates of 470,000–840,000 U.S. mRNA deaths—more than WWI, WWII, Vietnam, and Iraq combined—and a call for an FDA Class I recall. A Systematic Review lists: Florida extrapolation 470K, VAERS-adjusted 600K, and CDC data up to 900K.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The LARGEST COVID "vaccine" autopsy study EVER conducted found 73.9% of deaths after vaccination were caused by the shot. THREE independent estimates yield 470,000–840,000 U.S. mRNA deaths — more than WWI, WWII, Vietnam, and Iraq COMBINED. An FDA Class I Recall is MANDATORY. https://t.co/3W7QYRdx1k

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/a-systematic-review-of-autopsy-findings-in-deaths-after-covid-19-vaccination/ Florida Surgeon General Study Extrapolation (470K mRNA deaths): https://thefocalpoints.com/p/pfizer-mrna-shots-alone-likely-killed VAERS-Adjusted Mortality Estimate (600K mRNA deaths): https://thefocalpoints.com/p/covid-19-vaccines-likely-killed-more CDC Mortality Data Analysis (now up to 900K mRNA deaths): https://theethicalskeptic.com/2026/03/13/the-state-of-things-pandemic/

Saved - April 6, 2026 at 11:21 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨VACCINATED CHILDREN ARE FAR SICKER ACROSS ALL 22 CHRONIC DISEASES IN THE LARGEST VAXXED VS. UNVAXXED STUDY EVER CONDUCTED 1. Cancer: 📈 +54% 2. Autism: 📈 +180% 3. Neurodevelopmental disorders: 📈 +1254% 4. Autoimmune disease: 📈 +1120% 5. Motor disability: 📈 +810% 6. Speech disorder: 📈 +803% 7. Mental health disorders: 📈 +696% 8. Asthma: 📈 +553% 9. Developmental delay: 📈 +412% 10. Atopic disease: 📈 +386% 11. Seizure disorder: 📈 +216% 12. Food allergy: 📈 +128% 13. Neurological disorder: 📈 +26% 14. Any chronic condition: 📈 +250% Observed ONLY in vaccinated children: 15. ADHD 💉 16. Diabetes 💉 17. Brain dysfunction 💉 18. Behavioral disability 💉 19. Learning disability 💉 20. Intellectual disability 💉 21. Tics 💉 22. Other psychological disability 💉 Our peer-reviewed reanalysis of the landmark Henry Ford study found 22 out of 22 chronic disease categories were proportionally higher in vaccinated children. ZERO exceptions.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Our Peer-Reviewed Reanalysis of the Henry Ford Study Finds Vaccinated Children Sicker Across ALL 22 Chronic Disease Categories Reanalysis of the LARGEST U.S. vaccinated vs. unvaccinated birth cohort study ever conducted reveals 54% higher CANCER rates and 549% higher AUTISM-related disorders among vaccinated children. Our independent proportional-incidence reanalysis and peer-review of the Henry Ford birth cohort study (Lamerato et al.) — revealed at the U.S. Senate Hearing on September 9, 2025 — examined 18,468 children (16,511 vaccinated with a median of 18 doses and 1,957 completely unvaccinated) and found the following ⬇️ ⚠️All 22 chronic disease categories were more common in vaccinated children. 🧩Conditions which collectively form the clinical profile associated with autism spectrum disorder — including autism itself, ADHD, developmental delay, speech disorder, learning disability, neurological impairment, and related diagnoses — occurred at 5.49-fold (549%) higher odds in vaccinated children. 🎗️Childhood cancer occurred 54% more often in vaccinated children. 📈By age 10, 57% of vaccinated children had developed at least one chronic disease, compared to only 17% of unvaccinated children. We used proportional-incidence analysis because many conditions had zero or near-zero cases in the unvaccinated group — a well-known “zero-cell” problem that makes odds-ratio modeling mathematically incapable of detecting true differences. This method reveals the large disparities the original authors’ statistics hid. Proportional increases we calculated for all 22 chronic conditions: 1. Any chronic condition: 3.50x higher (+250%) 2. Asthma: 6.53x higher (+553%) 3. Atopic disease: 4.86x higher (+386%) 4. Autoimmune disease: 12.2x higher (+1120%) 5. Brain dysfunction: Present only in vaccinated 6. Cancer: 1.54x higher (+54%) 7. Diabetes: Present only in vaccinated 8. Food allergy: 2.28x higher (+128%) 9. Mental health disorder: 7.96x higher (+696%) 10. Neurodevelopmental disorder (umbrella): 13.54x higher (+1254%) 11. ADHD: Present only in vaccinated 12. Autism: 2.8x higher (+180%) 13. Behavioral disability: Present only in vaccinated 14. Developmental delay: 5.12x higher (+412%) 15. Learning disability: Present only in vaccinated 16. Intellectual disability: Present only in vaccinated 17. Speech disorder: 9.03x higher (+803%) 19. Motor disability: 9.1x higher (+810%) 19. Tics: Present only in vaccinated 20. Other psychological disability: Present only in vaccinated 21. Neurological disorder: 1.26x higher (+26%) 22. Seizure disorder: 3.16x higher (+216%) We calculated that the current CDC childhood immunization schedule now contains at least 81 doses of vaccines by age 18 — more than four times higher than the median exposure in the Henry Ford cohort. This means that the dramatic disparities we uncovered in this dataset emerge even at a fraction of the full CDC schedule. This is one of the clearest population-level datasets EVER produced demonstrating that the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule is a MAJOR driver of chronic disease, neurodevelopmental injury, and early-life morbidity.

@EndTribalism - End Tribalism in Politics

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical

Saved - March 31, 2026 at 8:04 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

ORACLE'S LARRY ELLISON: “Citizens will be on their best behavior” with AI surveillance systems "We're constantly recording and reporting everything that's going on." Welcome to the dystopian AI surveillance state. https://t.co/ZhF7caJADB

Saved - March 31, 2026 at 12:56 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨CDC data shows HUNDREDS of deaths among infants and toddlers within days of MMR vaccination — from SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME, CARDIAC ARREST, AND ENCEPHALITIS. Our study found MMR and MMRV vaccines have been linked to 2,657% MORE DEATHS than measles itself since 1995. https://t.co/tXvexg8hcs

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: MMR and MMRV Vaccines Linked to 2,657% More U.S. Deaths Than Measles Infection Since 1995 We found an ALARMING number of deaths among infants and toddlers shortly after MMR/MMRV vaccination in VAERS — often involving SIDS, seizures, and cardiac arrest ⬇️ Pharma-captured mass media and public health agencies have centered almost exclusively on the minimal dangers of measles infection and ignored grieving parents whose children were injured or even killed by the shots. No proper attention has been paid to signals emerging within the federal government’s own vaccine safety database. Now, our new McCullough Foundation study titled “Deaths Following MMR and MMRV Vaccination in the United States,” takes a comprehensive look at reported fatal outcomes following MMR and MMRV vaccination in the United States, doing the work that our public health agencies should have done many years ago. Our analysis of the federal VAERS safety database identified: 📍536 total global reports of death following MMR or MMRV vaccination 📍299 death reports explicitly attributed to the United States Among those 299 U.S. reports: 📍60.9% occurred in children under age 2 📍52.2% occurred specifically in the 12–15 month first-MMR dose window 📍52.8% occurred within just 14 days of vaccination 📍40.1% occurred within 7 days 📍74.6% occurred during visits where MMR/MMRV was given alongside additional vaccines 📍Commonly reported clinical presentations included SIDS or sudden unexplained death (24%), seizures (12%), cardiac arrest (8%), fever (15%), respiratory distress (7%), and encephalitis (3%). The deaths were heavily concentrated in the routine first-dose window and tightly clustered in the days immediately following vaccination. Since 1995 in the United States: 💉193 MMR/MMRV death reports with identifiable dates have been submitted to VAERS 🦠 7 measles infection–associated deaths have been recorded by the CDC That represents a 2,657% higher count of reported vaccine-associated deaths compared to measles deaths in the modern era. Less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS, meaning the number is likely FAR higher. In conclusion, we identified a serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination in the United States. A substantial number of reported deaths were documented, with patterns demonstrating pronounced alignment across age, temporality, routine-dose timing, concomitant vaccine exposure, and recurring clinical presentations—including fever, seizures, SIDS, and cardiac arrest. A vaccine should NEVER be deadlier than the disease.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 48 hours, MMR vaccine uptake may face TOTAL COLLAPSE. No parent wants to inject their baby with a DEADLY product. Public health agencies should have listened to grieving parents — and conducted this study years ago. Now they’ll have to scramble for damage control. https://t.co/8J9jtriZGO

Saved - March 20, 2026 at 7:41 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that lemongrass and dandelion root are claimed to selectively destroy human cancer cells in vitro and reduce tumor growth in mice by ~95% with zero harm to healthy cells, urging immediate clinical trials for colon and lymphoma cancers.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BOTH lemongrass and dandelion root selectively destroy human cancer cells in the lab and suppress human tumor growth in mice by ~95% — with ZERO harm to healthy cells. Common, non-toxic plants shown to HALT tumor growth in animal models deserve IMMEDIATE clinical trials. https://t.co/GievlZCNxM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Dandelion Root Extract Cuts Human Colon Tumor Growth in Mice by ~95% Without Toxicity: https://thefocalpoints.com/p/dandelion-root-extract-kills-95-of Lemongrass Extract Cuts Human Lymphoma Tumor Growth in Mice by ~95% Without Toxicity: https://thefocalpoints.com/p/lemongrass-extract-cuts-human-lymphoma https://t.co/FGXq9n4iwr

Saved - March 19, 2026 at 6:47 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨COMPLETE REMISSIONS of Stage IV cancers using anti-parasitics are now being documented in the peer-reviewed literature. HUNDREDS of studies find ivermectin and fenbendazole exert over 12 distinct anti-cancer mechanisms across more than 12 cancer types. https://t.co/6wjJYrYWgy

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Mel Gibson: "I have 3 friends. All 3 of them had stage 4 cancer…and all 3 of them…don't have cancer right now at all…" Joe Rogan: "What did they take…? Ivermectin and Fenbendazole…" Mel Gibson nods in agreement. https://t.co/E1VSzjTlkE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 shares a story about three friends who previously had stage four cancer but are not cancer-free now. He notes that what they took included ivermectin and fenbendazole, repeating fenbendazole for emphasis. He mentions they also drank something described as hydrochloride something or other, and points to studies that indicate people have proven they’ve been drinking methylene blue and similar substances. He explains methylene blue is a fabric dye, originally a text-style dye, and adds that it has profound effects on mitochondria. He asserts, “This stuff works, man.” He then observes that there are a lot of substances that do work, which he finds strange. He attributes this strangeness to profit, suggesting that when people hear about things that are demonized and then turn out to be effective, it raises questions about why those treatments are not promoted. He asks how medical institutions have failed, implying that cures exist but are not promoted because they are not profitable. The overall narrative contrasts hopeful anecdotal outcomes with a critique of consensus and financial incentives in the medical establishment, highlighting the tension between what works and what is promoted within mainstream medicine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll tell you a good story. Okay. I have three friends. All three of them had stage four cancer. All three of them don't have cancer right now at all, and they had some serious stuff going on. And what did they take? Yep. Jesus. They took some what you've heard they've taken. Ivermectin. Fenbendazole. Fenbendazole. Yeah. That's Yeah. I'm hearing that a lot. They drank hydrochloride something or other? There's studies on that now where people have proven that they've drinking methylene blue and stuff like that. Yeah. Methylene blue, which was a fabric dye. Yeah. Yeah. It was a text style dye, and now they find it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah. This stuff works, man. There's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange Mhmm. Because, again, it's profit. When you when you hear about things that are demonized and that that turn out to be effective, you always wonder, well, what is going on here? Mhmm. How is how is our medical institutions how have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable?
Saved - March 17, 2026 at 11:39 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: ALL major artificial intelligence systems — SuperGrok, ChatGPT-5, and Google Gemini — independently concluded that VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM after analyzing our landmark 82-page study. The 30-year lie that “vaccines don’t cause autism” has officially been TERMINATED.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.” “There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented. “We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.” But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up. In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately. “It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.” 🧵

Saved - March 9, 2026 at 11:03 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Mel Gibson isn't lying... A recent study documented COMPLETE REMISSION of Stage IV cancers using fenbendazole. Patients with advanced melanoma, breast, and prostate cancer saw their tumors disappear — without chemotherapy. Clinical trials must be launched immediately. https://t.co/f1J0Ot7crt

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Mel Gibson: "I have 3 friends. All 3 of them had stage 4 cancer…and all 3 of them…don't have cancer right now at all…" Joe Rogan: "What did they take…? Ivermectin and Fenbendazole…" Mel Gibson nods in agreement. https://t.co/Flk7b6qBFW

Saved - March 7, 2026 at 7:03 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that a peer-reviewed study claims mRNA vaccines are gene-altering, reprogramming human gene expression across systems. It cites persistent proteomic changes months post-injection and signals of genomic integration in tumor DNA, suggesting possible genome editing. The authors warn the platform’s use beyond COVID, including cancer, influenza, RSV, personalized therapies, and self-amplifying RNA, and call for an immediate suspension with surveillance.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA “Vaccines” Are GENE-ALTERING Technologies We found mRNA gene-transfer shots fundamentally REPROGRAM human gene expression across multiple biological systems — warranting IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION of the ENTIRE mRNA platform. Our newly published peer-reviewed paper in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons presents compelling evidence that mRNA vaccines operate through a gene-altering mechanism of action — fundamentally reprogramming human biology: (1) Transcriptomic Reprogramming: mRNA injections alter how human genes are switched on and off across critical cellular systems controlling metabolism, protein regulation, and stress responses. (2) Persistent Proteomic Alterations: Hundreds of circulating proteins remain altered for months after injection, demonstrating prolonged systemic biological effects. (3) Genomic Integration Signals: Multi-omic molecular analysis detected a host–vector chimeric sequence involving vaccine genetic material within human tumor DNA — suggesting a possible genomic integration event. This means the issue is no longer limited to COVID shots. The same mRNA platform is rapidly being deployed for: • cancer injections • influenza injections • RSV injections • personalized mRNA therapeutics • self-amplifying RNA platforms This dangerous gene-transfer platform was rolled out to BILLIONS of people without molecular surveillance, genomic monitoring, or biological circuit breakers capable of stopping aberrant gene expression. Immediate and comprehensive suspension of mRNA injections for human use is therefore required. @Docjohnc @neo7bioscience @McCulloughFund @P_McCulloughMD @AAPSonline

Saved - March 5, 2026 at 1:54 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

RFK Jr. is right — THOUSANDS of studies link 5G and EMFs to DNA damage, oxidative stress, neurological injury, and cancer. The multitrillion-dollar cellular industry does NOT care about your health — only speed and surveillance. Documented adverse biological effects span: ⚠️ Biochemical changes ⚠️ Cell membrane disruption ⚠️ Cell proliferation ⚠️ Gene expression changes ⚠️ Morphological effects ⚠️ Immune function disruption ⚠️ Brain/neuronal effects ⚠️ Electrophysiological effects ⚠️ Genotoxicity ⚠️ Oxidative stress ⚠️ Metabolic/enzyme effects ⚠️ Haematological effects ⚠️ Reduced cell viability ⚠️ Synergistic/combinative effects ⚠️ Fertility effects ⚠️ Behavioural effects ⚠️ Cell signalling disruption ⚠️ Apoptosis ⚠️ Learning effects ⚠️ Memory effects ⚠️ Hypoalgesic effects ⚠️ Tumour growth ⚠️ Developmental effects ⚠️ Endocrine effects ⚠️ Neurotransmitter effects ⚠️ Hepatic effects ⚠️ Ocular effects ⚠️ Cardiovascular effects

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - RFK Jr.'s U.S. Health and Human Services to launch investigative study on connections between 5G, mobile phones, neurological damage and cancer — Reuters https://t.co/OP3FcwPLXW

Saved - March 4, 2026 at 9:31 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Living Near a Cell Tower Linked to White Blood Cell Elevation Comparable to SMOKING 24% of residents living within 60 meters of a tower had abnormally high immune cell counts and over 50% of heavy phone users suffered the same — a signal of BIOLOGICAL STRESS. Researchers didn’t rely on surveys or symptoms. They drew blood, measured radiofrequency exposure inside participants’ homes, and analyzed complete immune cell profiles. The findings were striking: ⚠️RF exposure from nearby towers predicted elevated monocytes — a key inflammatory white blood cell — at levels comparable to smoking. ⚠️Nearly 1 in 4 residents near towers had immune markers above clinical limits ⚠️More than half of heavy mobile phone users (4–6 hrs/day) showed the same abnormal immune signal ⚠️The majority affected were under 30 years old White blood cells rise when the body detects stress from toxins, inflammation, or environmental exposures. When these immune markers cross clinical limits, it signals the body is reacting. As the authors concluded: “These results indicate human biological systems are under stress from both mobile phone use and local mobile phone tower exposures.”

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

RFK Jr. is right — THOUSANDS of studies link 5G and EMFs to DNA damage, oxidative stress, neurological injury, and cancer. The multitrillion-dollar cellular industry does NOT care about your health — only speed and surveillance. Documented adverse biological effects span: ⚠️ Biochemical changes ⚠️ Cell membrane disruption ⚠️ Cell proliferation ⚠️ Gene expression changes ⚠️ Morphological effects ⚠️ Immune function disruption ⚠️ Brain/neuronal effects ⚠️ Electrophysiological effects ⚠️ Genotoxicity ⚠️ Oxidative stress ⚠️ Metabolic/enzyme effects ⚠️ Haematological effects ⚠️ Reduced cell viability ⚠️ Synergistic/combinative effects ⚠️ Fertility effects ⚠️ Behavioural effects ⚠️ Cell signalling disruption ⚠️ Apoptosis ⚠️ Learning effects ⚠️ Memory effects ⚠️ Hypoalgesic effects ⚠️ Tumour growth ⚠️ Developmental effects ⚠️ Endocrine effects ⚠️ Neurotransmitter effects ⚠️ Hepatic effects ⚠️ Ocular effects ⚠️ Cardiovascular effects

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - RFK Jr.'s U.S. Health and Human Services to launch investigative study on connections between 5G, mobile phones, neurological damage and cancer — Reuters

Saved - February 27, 2026 at 8:11 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I list vaccines that were pulled: Cutter Polio Vaccine (1955) after 10 deaths; Swine Flu Vaccine (1976) after 20-50 deaths; RotaShield Vaccine (1999) after 10-15 bowel obstructions; Chikungunya Vaccine (2025) after 3 deaths; COVID-19 "Vaccine" (2026) 500,000+ deaths.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Cutter Polio Vaccine (1955): PULLED after 10 deaths. Swine Flu Vaccine (1976): PULLED after 20-50 deaths. RotaShield Vaccine (1999): PULLED after 10-15 cases of bowel obstruction. Chikungunya Vaccine (2025): PULLED after 3 deaths. COVID-19 "Vaccine" (2026): 500,000+ deaths.....

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nick, what does the Maha crew need to do and what do the people need to be demanding? First, we have to look in the past. Back in the nineteen fifties, they removed the Qatar polio vaccine for ten deaths. They removed the swine flu vaccine of nineteen seventies for twenty to fifty deaths. They removed the Rhoda Shield vaccine in 1999 due to ten cases of bowel obstruction. So regardless, it doesn't even matter. These vaccines have far surpassed the threshold for withdrawal of a product. There's just no argument. The data is there. There is no reason to deny it. People need to act accordingly with the data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What does the Maha crew need to do, and what do the people need to be demanding, Nick? Well, first, we have to look in the past. Back in the nineteen fifties, they removed the Qatar polio vaccine for ten deaths. They removed the swine flu vaccine of nineteen seventies for twenty to fifty deaths. They removed the Rhoda Shield vaccine in 1999 due to ten cases of bowel obstruction. So regardless, it doesn't even matter. These vaccines have far surpassed the threshold for withdrawal of a product. There's just no argument. The data is there. There is no reason to deny it. People need to act accordingly with the data.
Saved - February 27, 2026 at 7:02 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Bill Gates and Epstein began planning pandemics in 2011. 2011–2017: Emails/texts between Gates and Epstein discuss pandemic simulations and vaccine funding structures. 2019: Event 201 co-hosted by Gates Foundation simulates a global coronavirus pandemic weeks before COVID. https://t.co/3XVicCUFNy

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Beyond horrific. 2011: Bill Gates and Epstein began planning the Pandemic 2015: Gates partners with the WHO, World Bank, MSF and the UN 2017: Simulations are treated as a Business Model 2019: Covid Pandemic Simulation occurs which later happens with astonishing accuracy… https://t.co/qB5mA7bZCw

Saved - February 18, 2026 at 10:49 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: MMR and MMRV Vaccines Linked to 2,657% More U.S. Deaths Than Measles Infection Since 1995 We found an ALARMING number of deaths among infants and toddlers shortly after MMR/MMRV vaccination in VAERS — often involving SIDS, seizures, and cardiac arrest ⬇️ Pharma-captured mass media and public health agencies have centered almost exclusively on the minimal dangers of measles infection and ignored grieving parents whose children were injured or even killed by the shots. No proper attention has been paid to signals emerging within the federal government’s own vaccine safety database. Now, our new McCullough Foundation study titled “Deaths Following MMR and MMRV Vaccination in the United States,” takes a comprehensive look at reported fatal outcomes following MMR and MMRV vaccination in the United States, doing the work that our public health agencies should have done many years ago. Our analysis of the federal VAERS safety database identified: 📍536 total global reports of death following MMR or MMRV vaccination 📍299 death reports explicitly attributed to the United States Among those 299 U.S. reports: 📍60.9% occurred in children under age 2 📍52.2% occurred specifically in the 12–15 month first-MMR dose window 📍52.8% occurred within just 14 days of vaccination 📍40.1% occurred within 7 days 📍74.6% occurred during visits where MMR/MMRV was given alongside additional vaccines 📍Commonly reported clinical presentations included SIDS or sudden unexplained death (24%), seizures (12%), cardiac arrest (8%), fever (15%), respiratory distress (7%), and encephalitis (3%). The deaths were heavily concentrated in the routine first-dose window and tightly clustered in the days immediately following vaccination. Since 1995 in the United States: 💉193 MMR/MMRV death reports with identifiable dates have been submitted to VAERS 🦠 7 measles infection–associated deaths have been recorded by the CDC That represents a 2,657% higher count of reported vaccine-associated deaths compared to measles deaths in the modern era. Less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS, meaning the number is likely FAR higher. In conclusion, we identified a serious mortality safety signal following MMR/MMRV vaccination in the United States. A substantial number of reported deaths were documented, with patterns demonstrating pronounced alignment across age, temporality, routine-dose timing, concomitant vaccine exposure, and recurring clinical presentations—including fever, seizures, SIDS, and cardiac arrest. A vaccine should NEVER be deadlier than the disease.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 48 hours, MMR vaccine uptake may face TOTAL COLLAPSE. No parent wants to inject their baby with a DEADLY product. Public health agencies should have listened to grieving parents — and conducted this study years ago. Now they’ll have to scramble for damage control.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

We have just uncovered data that could result in the END of the MMR vaccine. Stay tuned.

Saved - February 14, 2026 at 8:17 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I note that states are declaring public health emergencies over infant deaths linked to transgenerational mRNA vaccine adverse events. I see CDC data allegedly showing babies dying at >50% excess years after mass vaccination of childbearing women. I am told genomic transfer of vaccine material to babies is claimed, causing deadly consequences. The 30-year decline supposedly collapsed in 2021 after the mRNA campaign, signaling a transgenerational crisis.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

States have begun declaring public health emergencies over skyrocketing infant deaths linked to transgenerational mRNA “vaccine” fatal adverse events. CDC data shows babies born are now dying at a >50% excess rate — YEARS after mass vaccination of childbearing women. Genomic integration in mothers likely transfers Pfizer/Moderna genetic material into the baby, resulting in deadly consequences. The 30-year decline in infant mortality collapsed in 2021, immediately following the mRNA injection campaign. A transgenerational crisis is here — children are dying who were never injected, but whose mothers were.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses signals of transgenerational harm, clarifying they are not referring to transgender issues but harms that span generations. They cite CDC data to support a claim that, beginning right after mass vaccination of childbearing-age women in early 2021, there is a statistically significant inflection point in infant mortality. They state that infant mortality rates had been steadily decreasing for thirty years, but in 2021, after mass vaccination, the rate “shoots right up,” and it “hasn't gone down since.” As of 2025, they assert, babies are dying at seventy-seven percent excess, with Mississippi reportedly declaring a state of emergency over the situation. The speaker further claims that mothers are not taking the shots anymore. They suggest that some of the genetic material from the vaccination appears to integrate into the body and may be passed on, describing it as a legacy effect. They emphasize that most people took the shots in 2021, and express concern that there could be effects through the generations as a result.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are just now identifying signals of transgenerational harm. So I'm not talking about transgender anymore. I'm talking about through generations. Right? So what's happened now is according to CDC data, if you look at it, starting right after the mass vaccination of childbearing age women in early twenty twenty one, there's a statistically significant inflection point. Right? So infant mortality rates are steadily going down for thirty years. 2021 hits mass vaccination. Boom. It shoots right up. It hasn't gone down since. It's 2025. That's the death of babies. Babies. Yeah. And and babies so babies in 2025 are now dying at seventy seven percent excess. Even Mississippi just declared a state of emergency over it. Really? Wait. Tell talk about Mother's aren't taking the shots anymore. No, they're not. It appears some of this genetic material appears to integrate into their body, possibly passed off. So it's it's a legacy effect probably. Most people took the shots in 2021. That's that's my concern is that how there could be effects through the generations.
Saved - February 8, 2026 at 2:42 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A recent study found glyphosate causes 10+ cancers in rats at “safe” doses. Regulators allowed worldwide glyphosate use based on a now-RETRACTED fraudulent study ghostwritten by Monsanto staff. The entire glyphosate safety narrative was built on FRAUD. https://t.co/pVMonvCxus

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a controversial 2000 study and its alleged connections to Monsanto. The speaker asserts that Monsanto staff helped write the article, and that the authors were likely receiving large sums of money from Monsanto. They claim much of the data in the study was unpublished, describing it as secret data from Monsanto, and label the paper “basically a complete fraud.” The study supposedly claimed that glyphosate was safe and not linked to cancer. The speaker then references subsequent studies released recently, which purportedly found that glyphosate increased or caused ten distinct types of cancer in rats when the rats were exposed at so-called safe levels. Despite these findings, the speaker notes that the original paper was used by agencies around the world to claim glyphosate was safe and to support approval processes. The speaker concludes that the entire foundation of those safety assurances was built on “a complete fraud and lie,” and states that the retraction of the 2000 paper is, in this context, something they are happy about, remarking that it is probably the only time they will be happy about a retraction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This study was published in the year 2000, and now it was revealed that actually Monsanto staff helped write this article. The authors were likely receiving large sums of money from Monsanto, and many of the data in this study was unpublished, the secret data from Monsanto. So it was basically a complete fraud and it claimed that glyphosate was safe and not linked to cancer. The and now we have all these studies that came out recently finding that glyphosate increase or caused 10 distinct types of cancer in rats when they're exposed at so called safe levels. And so this paper though was used by our agencies across the world to claim glyphosate was safe and in the approval processes. And so now all of that was built on a complete fraud and lie. And so this retraction is probably the only time I will be happy about a retraction.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The Florida Department of Health just found that your favorite bread is laced with carcinogenic glyphosate. https://t.co/YwK0mDESLd

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 9:46 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Our new study indicates that mRNA injections may never leave the human body in some individuals. Governments and corporations made blatantly false claims that mRNA would degrade within days to weeks. Now, in the most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study to date, mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein were repeatedly detected more than 3.5 years after the final injection — following >40 ER visits, >200 specialist encounters, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and multi-laboratory molecular confirmation across blood and tissue. Legal accountability is inevitable after billions worldwide were lied to.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states: "We found circulating Pfizer mRNA in his exosomes three point six years after his last shot, and we also found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process SV40 ORI segments, as well as the spike expression segments in his skin, in his Grover's disease area. He developed this skin disease after the shots." They add: "We also found vaccine spike protein and no nucleocapsid in this skin area as well." The speaker emphasizes timing: "Three point six years after his last shot, he suffered from myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, multisystem vaccination syndrome, neurological adverse events as well." They conclude: "And so the fact that we are finding this material forty three months after the last shot means we were lied to completely." The speaker claims: "We were told it would stay in the arm, it would degrade within weeks, that was wrong and we expect lawsuits to begin to flood in."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We found circulating Pfizer mRNA in his exosomes three point six years after his last shot, and we also found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process SV40 ORI segments, as well as the spike expression segments in his skin, in his Grover's disease area. He developed this skin disease after the shots. And we also found vaccine spike protein and no nucleocapsid in this skin area as well. Three point six years after his last shot, he suffered from myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, multisystem vaccination syndrome, neurological adverse events as well. And so the fact that we are finding this material forty three months after the last shot means we were lied to completely. We were told it would stay in the arm, it would degrade within weeks, that was wrong and we expect lawsuits to begin to flood in.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans More Than 3.5 Years After COVID-19 Vaccination We report the longest documented persistence of mRNA vaccine components to date, independently confirmed across multiple laboratories, biospecimens, and time points using diverse analytical methods. For years, the public was told that mRNA vaccine materials would degrade within days to weeks — rapidly broken down, biologically transient, and incapable of long-term persistence. That assumption shaped regulatory assurances, public messaging, and safety expectations worldwide. Billions across the globe received these injections based on the claim that the genetic material would quickly disappear from the body. Today, that narrative collapses — following a coordinated, multi-country investigative effort involving the McCullough Foundation, the INMODIA laboratory (Germany), the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany), Neo7Bioscience, and collaborating independent laboratories. The resulting paper, titled “Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” presents what is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine injury case report to date. A 55-year-old male developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction following three Pfizer mRNA doses, including pulmonary emboli, MRI-confirmed myocarditis, small fiber neuropathy, autonomic dysfunction, neurocognitive impairment, chronic GI involvement, sensorineural hearing loss, dermatologic inflammation, and anxiety/depression. Diagnostic evaluation was extraordinary: 40+ ER visits 200+ specialist encounters (18 disciplines) 100+ lab investigations 100+ imaging/functional studies Infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic causes were systematically excluded. SARS-CoV-2 infection was effectively ruled out: 🚫 Nucleocapsid antibodies negative across 5 separate time points spanning 809–1,433 days post-vaccination, confirmed by 3 independent laboratories. 🚫 Nucleocapsid protein absent in serial skin biopsies obtained 1,160–1,364 days post-vaccination — despite clear spike protein deposition in the same specimens. 📈 Meanwhile, spike antibodies remained persistently elevated, including 4,553 U/mL in January 2026 (1,433 days post-vaccination). Serial blood & tissue sampling (852–1,364 days post-vaccination) revealed: 📍Day 852 — SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein detected within classical & non-classical monocyte subsets via blood-based immune phenotyping/flow cytometric analysis, with associated cytokine abnormalities. 📍Day 1,173 — Free Wuhan spike protein detected in plasma (129.0 ± 4.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA. 📍Day 1,173 — Spike protein detected in circulating exosomes (11.6 ± 0.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA following exosomal isolation. 📍Day 1,284 — Vaccine-derived spike mRNA detected in circulating exosomes by RT-PCR using DNase-treated RNA extraction and amplicon-specific primers targeting three spike ORF regions (S1–S3). PBMC RNA was negative. 📍Days 1,173 & 1,284 — Persistently elevated spike-specific IgG4 concentrations (354.4 ± 22.4 ng/mL; 320.2 ± 4.4 ng/mL) identified by serologic profiling, consistent with sustained antigen exposure. Serial skin biopsies demonstrated: 📍Day 1,160 — Spike protein deposition in endothelial cells & macrophages detected by automated immunohistochemistry with histopathologic correlation; nucleocapsid protein absent. 📍Day 1,249 — Persistent spike protein deposition in endothelial and immune cell compartments by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent. 📍Day 1,364 — Spike protein detected in endothelial cells, macrophages, and nerve fibers by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent in the same specimen. 📍Day 1,364 — Plasmid DNA elements detected in skin tissue — including spike gene sequences (S1–S3), ori1/ori2, and SV40 enhancer fragments — confirmed by PCR amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. Whole-genome sequencing structural variant analysis at 1,277 days post-vaccination revealed widespread genomic instability, with large duplications and deletions affecting EGFR, MYC, ERBB2, and ETV6/RUNX1, while RNA–DNA comparison showed RNA-only variants in ribosomal, NMD, small-RNA, epigenetic, and TP53 pathways. Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood highlighted oxidative stress, vascular activation, and nuclear fragility. Urine proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry confirmed systemic inflammation with complement overactivation (CFH), redox imbalance (PRDX1), and sustained antibody responses, supported by risk alleles HLA-B07:02 and DRB1*11:04. This longitudinal, multi-laboratory investigation provides direct evidence that mRNA vaccine–derived genetic material and its translated protein products can persist in humans for years following administration, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source. In parallel, multi-omic analyses revealed sustained genomic instability and transcriptomic dysregulation more than 3.5 years post-vaccination, suggesting that persistent vaccine-derived material may be associated with long-term alterations in host genomic and molecular pathways. Yes, we were lied to.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 36 hours, irrefutable molecular evidence will be released with major global implications. 200+ specialist evaluations across 18 medical disciplines 100+ advanced laboratory investigations 100+ imaging /functional diagnostic studies 70+ alternative diagnoses ruled out https://t.co/6JcAzsEWGd

Saved - February 4, 2026 at 4:54 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Why Some People Are Not Harmed by COVID-19 "Vaccination" Some batches cause mass injury and death. Others are harmless duds. 🔥 Hot lots: DNA plasmids, mRNA overload, heavy metals 🧊 Dud lots: Degraded. Inactive. Multiple peer-reviewed studies confirm: batch determines fate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Four studies are cited as showing significant lot variability in the vaccine batches. The speaker notes that the variability is substantial across lots, with some batches from the early 2021 period appearing to be the most dangerous. They state that some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while other lots are linked to no adverse events at all, describing these as “duds.” According to the speaker, these problematic batches may result from several issues: the mRNA being degraded, or the cold-chain failure such as being left out of the refrigerator for too long, or problems in the manufacturing process that rendered the batch ineffective. The implication is that these dud batches were not manufactured properly. The speaker emphasizes that some of these batches had devastating effects on individuals. They further claim that these batches were probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from the manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, and even heavy metal contamination. The range of issues is described as broad, indicating multiple types of contamination or quality problems in different batches. The overall assertion is that not a single batch appears to be the same as another; there is clear heterogeneity across batches, with some batches causing major adverse events and others causing none.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's now four studies that show lot variability, significant lot variability. We're actually the early twenty twenty one batches were actually the most dangerous it appeared. And, yes, some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events. Some lots are linked to no adverse events really at all. And they're basically batches called duds. Right? Probably the mRNA is degraded or it's been left out of the refrigerator for too long or the manufacturing process was was a bust and it wasn't manufactured properly thankfully right for those individuals. But, yeah, some of these batches, they just decimated people and they're probably contaminated with with high levels of DNA plasmids from a manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, even heavy metal contamination has been detected in these batches. So all sorts of things. But, yeah, really no batch appeared to be the same.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Since batch-dependent safety of COVID-19 mRNA injections has been demonstrated, checking your batch can be a useful tool to help predict possible long-term adverse events: https://knollfrank.github.io/HowBadIsMyBatch/HowBadIsMyBatch.html https://t.co/SEUq1CvHxw

@McCulloughFund - McCullough Foundation

The Safety of COVID-19 'Vaccines' is Batch-Dependent Epidemiologist @NicHulscher explains with @chriswerge Full Episode: https://youtu.be/zx0I8ku81tI?si=C2z7l3Ixkr9s87VT #MFScholar

Saved - February 4, 2026 at 4:13 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study ever conducted found that vaccine mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein can persist in humans for at least 3.5 YEARS — independently confirmed across multiple labs, biospecimens, and time points using multiple methods. https://t.co/odfaKuHTgK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes what he claims is the strongest case report ever done on vaccine injury, specifically mRNA vaccine injury. The subject is a 51-year-old man who developed myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, neurological disturbances, and skin disturbances, constituting multisystem long vaccine syndrome. The key findings are said to be detected 3.6 years after his last shot. Exosomes circulating in his body allegedly contain Pfizer mRNA, and this mRNA is still present in those exosomes years after vaccination. The same mRNA is reportedly also found in his skin. In addition, plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process is claimed to be present in his skin, again 3.6 years after vaccination. Specifically, the plasmid DNA allegedly includes the SV40 segment, the spike expression cassette, and the open reading frame region, with all components of the plasmids in the Grover's disease–affected skin area. Microscopic analysis of the Grover’s disease area allegedly showed staining for SARS-CoV-2 spike or vaccine spike, indicating the presence of spike protein in that skin region. This staining for spike protein is reported as occurring 3.6 years after the shot. Overall, the speaker asserts that all vaccine components—mRNA, plasmid DNA with defined segments, and spike protein—remain in the body for multiple years, with findings in exosomes and skin indicating long-lasting presence. The speaker also asserts that this represents a situation in which “we were completely lied to.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's probably the strongest case report, ever done on vaccine injury, mRNA vaccine injury. So what we found was in an individual, 51 year old man, he developed myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, neurological disturbances, skin disturbances. So he has multisystem long vaccine syndrome. We found three point six years after his last shot circulating Pfizer mRNA in what's called his exosomes. These kind of bubbles circulate around the body, act as as kind of messengers. So the mRNA is still in there. Pfizer mRNA as well as in his skin. You won't even believe it. We found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process. Again, three point six years after literally just placed in his skin. It was the s v 40 segment of it. It was the spike expression cassette of it and it was the open reading frame region. So all components of the plasmas were in his skin in what's called the Grover's disease area where he developed the skin disease from the shot. And then we looked microscopically inside of this Grover's disease area, and we literally stained it for SARS CoV two spike or vaccine spike, and we found it. It's stained. Third, 3.6 after his shot, he still has spike protein in his skin. And so we found all these vaccine components, it appears they last for multiple years, and we were completely lied to.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

x.com/i/article/2018…

Article Cover

STUDY: Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans More Than 3.5 Years

For years, the public was told that mRNA vaccine materials would degrade within days to weeks — rapidly broken down, biologically transient, and incapable of long-term persistence. That assumption shaped regulatory assurances, public messaging, and safety expectations worldwide. Billions across the globe received these injections based on the claim that the genetic material would quickly disappear from the body.

Today, that narrative collapses — following a coordinated, multi-country investigative effort involving the McCullough Foundation, the INMODIA laboratory (Germany), the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany), Neo7Bioscience, and collaborating independent laboratories.

The resulting paper, titled “Unprecedented" target="_blank">https://zenodo.org/records/18460099">Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” presents what is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine injury case report to date — involving >40 emergency department visits, >200 specialist encounters across 18 medical disciplines, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and serial blood and tissue sampling performed at multiple timepoints over more than 3.5 years.

The findings reveal longitudinal molecular evidence that vaccine-derived mRNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and spike protein can persist in human blood and tissue more than 3.5 years after vaccination — independently confirmed across multiple laboratories using diverse analytical methods.

SARS-CoV-2 infection was effectively excluded: nucleocapsid antibodies remained negative across five separate timepoints and three independent laboratories, and nucleocapsid protein was absent in tissue specimens despite the presence of spike protein deposition.

Article image

Case Presentation

We report a 55-year-old male who received three doses of the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and subsequently developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction consistent with post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS), involving cardiopulmonary, neurologic, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, autonomic, otolaryngologic, audiovestibular, immune, ophthalmic, dermatologic, and psychiatric domains. Clinical manifestations included: pulmonary emboli; delayed MRI-confirmed myocarditis; neurocognitive impairment; small fiber neuropathy; autonomic dysfunction; myalgia; chronic pancreatic and gastrointestinal involvement; worsened tinnitus with sensorineural hearing loss; voice dysphagia and dysphonia; ophthalmic disturbances; chronic dermatologic inflammation; and anxiety/depression. The case was evaluated through a uniquely extensive longitudinal, multi-domain clinical investigation spanning molecular, immunologic, genetic, proteomic, transcriptomic, and tissue-based analyses, undertaken to characterize disease mechanisms and exclude alternative etiologies.

Article image

Extensive Diagnostic Evaluation

After >40 emergency department visits and >200 outpatient specialty encounters, the patient underwent >100 non-routine laboratory investigations and >100 imaging/functional studies. This evaluation systematically excluded underlying etiologic mechanisms across infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular/vascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic domains. Testing remained largely nondiagnostic. A possible undocumented/undiagnosed asymptomatic infection manifesting as Long COVID was suspected after myocarditis diagnosis, and serology was pursued; unexpected results prompted expanded immune and tissue-based testing for spike- and vaccine-derived components. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies were negative across five separate time points spanning 809–1,433 days post-vaccination, confirmed by three independent laboratories. The patient remains nucleocapsid negative with persistently elevated spike antibody levels (4,553 U/mL) 1,433 days after the final vaccination.

Specimen Collection and Analytical Methods

Blood and skin tissue specimens were obtained at multiple time points between 852–1,364 days after the final Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Biological compartments analyzed included plasma, circulating exosomes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and skin tissue. Specimens were evaluated across multiple independent laboratories using diverse analytical methodologies, including ELISA, automated immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, standard PCR with Sanger sequencing confirmation, whole-genome sequencing, transcriptomic profiling, and quantitative mass spectrometry.

Article image

Persistent Circulating Spike Protein and Vaccine-Derived mRNA

At 852 days post-vaccination, blood-based immune testing identified detectable SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein within classical and non-classical monocyte subsets with associated cytokine and immune marker abnormalities.

At 1,173 days post-vaccination, high-sensitivity ELISA detected free Wuhan spike protein in plasma (129.0 ± 4.1 fg/mL) and in circulating exosomes (11.6 ± 0.1 fg/mL).

At 1,284 days, RT-PCR identified vaccine-derived spike mRNA within circulating exosomes, whereas PBMC RNA remained negative following DNase-treated extraction and amplicon-specific PCR targeting three spike ORF regions (S1–S3).

Serologic profiling at 1,173 and 1,284 days post-vaccination demonstrated persistently elevated spike-specific IgG4 concentrations (354.4 ± 22.4 ng/mL and 320.2 ± 4.4 ng/mL, respectively), consistent with ongoing antigenic stimulation and an immune-tolerance–skewed response.

Article image

Persistent Spike Protein and Plasmid DNA in Skin Tissue

Serial skin biopsies at 1,160, 1,249, and 1,364 days post-vaccination, all from truncal skin within areas of clinically active Grover’s disease, were nucleocapsid negative and demonstrated persistent spike protein deposition in endothelial cells and macrophages by automated immunohistochemistry with histopathologic correlation. Spike protein was also found in nerve fibers at 1,364 days.

The 1,364-day skin biopsy contained multiple plasmid DNA elements, including spike gene sequences (S1–S3), ori1/ori2, and the SV40 enhancer, confirming durable retention of vaccine-derived DNA in somatic tissue by PCR amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing.

Article image

Multi-Omic Analysis

Whole-genome sequencing structural variant analysis at 1,277 days post-vaccination revealed widespread genomic instability, with large duplications and deletions affecting EGFR, MYC, ERBB2, and ETV6/RUNX1, while RNA–DNA comparison showed RNA-only variants in ribosomal, NMD, small-RNA, epigenetic, and TP53 pathways.

Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood highlighted oxidative stress, vascular activation, and nuclear fragility.

Urine proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry confirmed systemic inflammation with complement overactivation (CFH), redox imbalance (PRDX1), and sustained antibody responses, supported by risk alleles HLA-B07:02 and DRB1*11:04.

Conclusion

This case documents the longest reported in vivo persistence of vaccine-derived mRNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and spike protein following mRNA vaccination, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source. The convergence of these observations across longitudinal blood and tissue sampling provides direct evidence that mRNA vaccine-derived genetic material and its translated protein products can persist in vivo for years following administration.

In parallel, multi-omic analyses revealed sustained genomic instability and transcriptomic dysregulation more than 3.5 years post-vaccination, suggesting that persistent vaccine-derived material may be associated with long-term alterations in host genomic and molecular pathways.

These data challenge prevailing assumptions regarding rapid degradation and short-lived biological activity of mRNA vaccine components and underscore the need for controlled longitudinal studies to determine prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical consequences of persistent vaccine-derived material.

Saved - February 2, 2026 at 12:38 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING: Bill Gates was planning “Pandemic Simulations” with Jeffrey Epstein in 2017. You can’t make this up. https://t.co/kCLyFNssbo

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speakers acknowledge that they did not simulate or practice the current situation. - They note this work is being done on behalf of their partners at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. - They indicate that the efforts span both health policies and economic policies. - They describe the current environment as uncharted territory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now here we are. You know, we we didn't simulate this. We didn't practice. On behalf of our partners in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. So both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in unchartered territory.
Saved - January 25, 2026 at 5:56 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Nokia's CEO says that by 2030 "smartphones will be implanted directly into our bodies" as 6G becomes fully operational. President Trump recently signed a Memorandum to accelerate 6G deployment, with a stated goal to "operate implantable technologies." This is a dangerous path. https://t.co/BLHJweg3E0

Video Transcript AI Summary
By around 2030, the smartphone as we know it today will not be the usual kind of the most common interface; many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About six gs earlier, which is around 2,030. I would say that by then, definitely the smartphone as we know it today will not anymore be the usual kind of the most common interface. Many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

RFK Jr. is right — THOUSANDS of studies link 5G and EMFs to DNA damage, oxidative stress, neurological injury, and cancer. The multitrillion-dollar cellular industry does NOT care about your health — only speed and surveillance. Documented adverse biological effects span: ⚠️ Biochemical changes ⚠️ Cell membrane disruption ⚠️ Cell proliferation ⚠️ Gene expression changes ⚠️ Morphological effects ⚠️ Immune function disruption ⚠️ Brain/neuronal effects ⚠️ Electrophysiological effects ⚠️ Genotoxicity ⚠️ Oxidative stress ⚠️ Metabolic/enzyme effects ⚠️ Haematological effects ⚠️ Reduced cell viability ⚠️ Synergistic/combinative effects ⚠️ Fertility effects ⚠️ Behavioural effects ⚠️ Cell signalling disruption ⚠️ Apoptosis ⚠️ Learning effects ⚠️ Memory effects ⚠️ Hypoalgesic effects ⚠️ Tumour growth ⚠️ Developmental effects ⚠️ Endocrine effects ⚠️ Neurotransmitter effects ⚠️ Hepatic effects ⚠️ Ocular effects ⚠️ Cardiovascular effects

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses strong concern about five Gs towers, suggesting their worry is high (even implying a scale up to nine or ten). They state that calling it “five Gs” is a misnomer because it doesn’t tell you what’s wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths, and some of them are very bad. They note that in Europe, regulations are an order of magnitude lower than what is allowed here. There are literally over 10,000 studies that document a number of ill effects, including cancer and tumor growth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, how concerned should we be about five gs towers, do think? I'm very concerned about it. So, like nine, ten? Calling it five gs is actually a misnomer because that doesn't have to do with five gs does not tell you what's wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths and some of them are very bad. And in Europe, the regulations are order of magnitude lower than what we allow here. But there are literally over 10,000 studies that just document a number of ill effects, including cancer, tumor growth,

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - RFK Jr.'s U.S. Health and Human Services to launch investigative study on connections between 5G, mobile phones, neurological damage and cancer — Reuters

Saved - January 19, 2026 at 1:19 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I assert our peer-reviewed re-analysis of the largest vaxxed vs unvaxxed study shows vaccinated children are far sicker across all 22 chronic diseases, with increases like Neurodevelopmental disorders +1254%, Autoimmune +1120%, Motor +810%, and 15–22—disorders like ADHD, Diabetes, and Learning disability—observed only in vaccinated kids. Bottom line: 22/22 chronic conditions worse in vaccinated children; zero in unvaccinated. The CDC’s schedule drives these epidemics.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Our peer-reviewed re-analysis of the LARGEST vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study in HISTORY shows vaccinated children are FAR sicker across ALL 22 chronic diseases: 1. Neurodevelopmental disorders: 📈 +1254% 2. Autism: 📈 +180% 3. Cancer: 📈 +54% 4. Autoimmune disease: 📈 +1120% 5. Motor disability: 📈 +810% 6. Speech disorder: 📈 +803% 7. Mental health disorders: 📈 +696% 8. Asthma: 📈 +553% 9. Developmental delay: 📈 +412% 10. Atopic disease: 📈 +386% 11. Seizure disorder: 📈 +216% 12. Food allergy: 📈 +128% 13. Neurological disorder: 📈 +26% 14. Any chronic condition: 📈 +250% Observed ONLY in vaccinated children (ZERO cases in unvaccinated): 15. ADHD 💉 16. Diabetes 💉 17. Brain dysfunction 💉 18. Behavioral disability 💉 19. Learning disability 💉 20. Intellectual disability 💉 21. Tics 💉 22. Other psychological disability 💉 Bottom line: 22 out of 22 chronic disease categories were worse in vaccinated children. ZERO exceptions. The CDC’s hyper-vaccination schedule is driving the modern epidemics of chronic disease and autism.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that, when re-examining the data from the original study, the raw numbers reveal a different pattern than what the study’s modeling suggested. Specifically, they state that, in the raw proportions, every single one of the 22 chronic disease categories was proportionally higher in the vaccinated group. This includes cancer, which the study reportedly treated as a control condition and claimed there was no difference for. According to Speaker 0, the study’s use of cancer as a control is at odds with the raw data they observed. They claim that there was a difference in cancer outcomes, contrary to the study’s implication of no difference. They emphasize that, with rare outcomes, the modeling employed in the original analysis is not very reliable, and as a result, the study did not perform any basic proportional analysis. Speaker 0 states that when they performed a basic proportional analysis themselves, cancer was fifty-four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. They mention that this result is “explained biologically” and assert that there is biological plausibility behind it. Key points: - Raw proportions show all 22 chronic disease categories higher in the vaccinated group, including cancer. - The original study used cancer as a control and claimed no difference, which Speaker 0 disputes based on the raw data. - Modeling for rare outcomes is described as not very reliable. - A basic proportional analysis by Speaker 0 indicates cancer is 54% higher in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated. - A biological explanation or plausibility is asserted for the observed cancer difference in the vaccinated group.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so what we did was we looked at the raw numbers, right? So the original study, they did so much modeling, like statistical models, and we really didn't see just the raw proportions between the groups. When we looked at the raw proportions, it was every single, all 22 of the chronic disease categories were proportionally higher in the vaccinated. All 22 including cancer. Really? Because I mean, they said in the study it kind of uses cancer as the control, saying there was no difference in cancer, and you're saying there was a difference in cancer. Yes, so when it comes to rare outcomes, the modeling they use, you know, it's not very reliable, and so they didn't do any basic proportional analysis, but when we did that and we looked, cancer was fifty four percent higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated children. So they had fifty four percent more cases and, you know, this is explained biologically. There is biological plausibility behind it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

A bombshell vax vs. unvax study is now seeing the light of day — and the results are staggering. Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” Here’s what the study revealed: • Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma. • Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema). • Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases. • 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. • 2.9 times more motor disabilities. • 4.5 times more speech disorders. • Three times more developmental delays. • Six times more acute and chronic ear infections. • In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders. • The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.” If this study could be sidelined for producing inconvenient results, how many others have met the same fate? But the truth is, you don’t need a study to notice the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses that publishing the material would effectively end his career. Speaker 1 questions what in the data could make the outcomes catastrophic for his career. Speaker 2 notes the study as a “bombshell.” The study included 18,468 subjects, of whom 1,957 were fully unvaccinated. When comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated groups, there was an increased risk of several chronic health conditions in the vaccinated group. Specifically, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis, with an adjusted figure of 4.29 times (range 3.26 to 5.65 across analyses). Speaker 4 adds that the study also found a threefold increase in atopic diseases, which are a subset of allergic diseases. The researchers reported almost a sixfold risk for autoimmune disease, listing autoimmune conditions such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus), multiple sclerosis, and Guillain–Barré syndrome. They note there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and the data showed a sixfold increase in autoimmunity among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3 highlights neurodevelopmental disorders, noting a five-and-a-half times increased risk. The discussion emphasizes that the immune system is intimately connected with brain development and functioning, suggesting that when the immune system is triggered by illness or vaccination, neuropsychiatric symptoms may arise due to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2 reports two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities and four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated group versus the unvaccinated, along with a threefold rate of developmental delay. The data also show, consistent with allergy and autoimmunity findings, six times more acute and chronic ear infections in the vaccinated group. Speaker 3 notes that in several health conditions, analysis could not be performed because there were none in the unvaccinated group, and the methods required nonzero counts in both groups. For example, there were two hundred sixty-two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group, while the unvaccinated group had zero cases of ADHD. The same pattern is described for other conditions: zero cases of brain dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, ticks, and other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated group.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I'd be finished. Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just curious. You see What in this data makes you think it will be as catastrophic to your career as you think. Speaker 2: What was he so afraid of? The study was a bombshell. Speaker 3: Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred and fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Speaker 1: Four point two nine times in the adjusted. And that seems I've looked at a lot of studies. There's three point two six to five point six five. Speaker 4: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases. Speaker 3: Which is kind of a subset of allergic diseases. Speaker 4: They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease. Speaker 5: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mentioned there are over 80 different autoimmune disease, and what their data showed for autoimmunity, six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: Which is staggering because autoimmune disorders really represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering, you know, accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders What Speaker 1: kind of numbers are we talking about? Do you remember? Speaker 4: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Speaker 3: We know that the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning. And so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and, you know, immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 5: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same things I found related to allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections. Speaker 3: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The way that the mathematical formulas work, you can't have a zero in any one group and be able to compare risk. Speaker 4: For example, there were two hundred and sixty two children who had ADHD in the Speaker 5: vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD. Zero. These ones are just mind boggling. These conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids. Zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero ticks, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.
Saved - January 18, 2026 at 9:25 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Yes, our study concluded that the current H5N1 bird flu outbreak likely originated from the USDA Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory—and not a single U.S. government agency has challenged our findings. https://t.co/iDlxjUHp8t

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Bird Flu Was Created In A US Research Lab Using Gain Of Function... “Current H5N1 strain is man-made from USDA gain-of-function serial passage research in Athens, Georgia...extended to waterfowl, cattle, mammals!” — Dr. Peter McCullough, MD https://t.co/O7zhmfhRbR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Cardcaine, an epidemiologist from the University of Michigan, is identified as the person who broke the story in February about a bird flu outbreak linked to the USDA research lab. He states that mainstream media are not reporting on this development. He also asserts that Peter Hotez will not tell the public about this information. According to the speaker, the current strain of bird flu in this outbreak was created in a lab through serial passage conducted in a U.S. government laboratory. The claim specifies that this lab-driven process enabled the virus to jump from traditional chickens to migratory waterfowl. From there, the outbreak purportedly spread to cows, marking a transition from poultry to other species in the ecosystem. The narrative presented emphasizes that the origin and progression of the outbreak are laboratory-generated, rather than arising solely from natural spillover events. The speaker highlights that the virus was manipulated via serial passage in a government lab, a technique used to adapt pathogens to new hosts or improve transmissibility. The sequence described claims a progression: initial adaptation in poultry, transmission to migratory waterfowl, and subsequent appearance in cattle. The speaker underscores two supplementary points: first, that major media outlets have not reported on this angle of the outbreak; second, that a well-known public figure in the field, Peter Hotez, is portrayed as someone who would supposedly not disclose this information. The overall message portrays a narrative of concealment and laboratory involvement in the emergence and spread of the bird flu across species, culminating in its presence in cows. In summary, the speaker attributes the outbreak to deliberate laboratory manipulation via serial passage in a U.S. government facility, tracing a path from chickens to migratory waterfowl and then to cows, while accusing mainstream media of omission and suggesting that Peter Hotez would not disclose these details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cardcaine epidemiologist from University of Michigan. He's the one who broke the story on this clague February, this bird flu that came out of the USDA research lab. You know, the mainstream media is not reporting on this and Peter Hotez will never tell you this, but the current strain of bird flu in this outbreak is created in a lab through serial passage in a US government lab. It got it to spread from traditional chicken into migratory waterfowl, and now it's into the cows. Incredible, incredible.