TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @WallStreetApes

WallStreetApes
Posted - August 12, 2026 at 12:09 AM
Saved - August 12, 2026 at 4:19 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I have to get extremely loud about what Democrat socialists like Hasan Piker are saying in their own words: they’ll eliminate and impoverish white people, murder capitalists, kill landlords and oppose policies not supporting Medicare for all, claim America deserved 9/11, talk about “9/11 2,” and say giving a Muslim country a nuke could be used against America. I’ll add more in the video—BELIEVE THEM.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

We have to get extremely loud about what Democrat socialists like Hasan Piker are saying with their own words - They will eliminate the White race - They will impoverish the White race - They will murder capitalists and watch as our streets run red with their blood - Their plan is to import so many foreigners they will eliminate the White race - They plan on r*ping white women and white children - America deserved 9/11 - Kill landlords - Kill policies who don’t support Medicare for all - Hasan Piker says to give a Muslim country a nuke so they can use it on America He also says “9/11 2 is going to be so sick” And so much more, I’ll add more in the video This is the new Democrat Party and they are literally telling us their plan BELIEVE THEM

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses Hassan Piker’s remarks and argues that a recurring pattern of racially resentful, violent rhetoric should be categorized as extremism and taken seriously rather than dismissed as jokes. It cites Piker’s celebration of comments attributed to “Mandamie’s aide, his top aide, Cia Weaver,” saying, “If you don't believe in the government's sacred right to seize property, it's over, and impoverish the white middle class.” The transcript then quotes Piker responding approvingly to a discussion about “the white middle class,” while mocking “they” and claiming “we are going to bring immigrants into America to… destroy the white race.” The speaker challenges the idea that similar rhetoric is only dangerous when expressed by the right. They assert that if a right-wing figure celebrated impoverishing the black middle class and described using government immigration to destroy the black race, people would not insist on “context” or that “he was joking.” The speaker claims Piker has “an enormous audience” that shapes “millions of Capitalism and just politics,” and argues that repeated, explicit racial and dehumanizing statements—along with openly celebrating similarly extreme claims—indicate a pattern rather than isolated remarks. The transcript further alleges that Piker and those he celebrates have made violent statements, including “killing capitalists” and “making their blood fill up the streets,” as well as saying “America deserved 9/11.” It asserts the same rhetorical pattern should be recognized as extremism regardless of political direction, stating that if it would be called extremism when said by someone on the right, it must be recognized as extremism when it appears from the left. Additional examples presented in the transcript include: celebrating “9/11” as “so sick,” claiming the intention is to give a Muslim nation a nuke “so that they can nuke America,” describing plans to wipe America off the face of the earth, and asserting “they want us all dead.” It also claims there are statements approving or celebrating sexual assault connected to October 7, praising Hamas as “a thousand times better than a fascist settler colony,” advocating that “Landlords and capitalists should both be murdered,” and saying “Anybody who doesn't support Medicare for All should be killed, even our politicians.” The transcript further claims statements like “Jews are inbred,” and calls it “the best flag ever” in relation to terrorist organizations waving AKs. The transcript’s main conclusion is that “they are planning on another 9/11,” want nukes on American soil to “wipe us out,” and that, it claims, these people are not only present in America but are also “running for office,” with support for the ideology around them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you Hassan Piker. We're gonna keep bringing in immigrants in this country on purpose, just so they can fuck your sister, and then maybe even your daughter. We're gonna destroy the white race, bitch. Nice, right? Well, let's see what else he has to say as it specifically pertains to white people. Mandamie's aide, his top aide, Cia Weaver said, "If you don't believe in the government's sacred right to seize property, it's over, and impoverish the white middle class." Beast Mode, I love her so much. So I don't know, okay? You guys tell me. Would we categorize those statements under the banner of extremism? We don't have to pretend that every stupid, or in my opinion, extreme thing, which is a lot of what he says, that it means that he's trying to propose it as literal policy. It's about the fact that the same worldview from this guy keeps showing up again and again and again, and it all points in the same direction. This time regarding white people. His response to someone who was in aid of Mam White middle class, his response to that is "Golly, it's bravo, amazing, I love this woman." But then he says, in a kind of mocking tone, that "they," meaning the socialist, "they, we are going to bring immigrants into America to, quote, what he says, destroy the white race." Okay, reverse this. If one of the biggest, say, I don't know, right wing streamers in America celebrated somebody openly talking about impoverishing the black middle class, then said that immigration was gonna be used by our government, by the people that this- person in this incident supported to destroy the black race, would people be asking, "To, you know, well, let's carefully consider the context. Oh, he was joking. Why, why can't you take a joke? Would they be doing that? I don't think so. I'm not really sure what happened in America that led people to believe this bizarre idea that rhetoric about race, resentment, and dehumanization can only ever come from people on the right and that it's only dangerous when people on the right say it. No, okay? This guy has an enormous audience and shapes how millions of Capitalism and just politics in general. So when someone with this kind of influence and audience repeatedly says things this ugly and then openly celebrates people saying similarly, if not worse, even more ugly things, I think we're allowed to, and not only that we're allowed to, that we should, take him seriously. Eventually, you stop explaining every statement away individually and you start to look at the pattern. And there's a pattern with this guy. Again, these are just a few examples of recent clips that have resurfaced that are very controversial, not to mention where he's talked about killing capitalists. And making their blood fill up the streets and let the streets soak in their blood, he said that America deserved 9/11, and if you would immediately recognize this pattern and this rhetoric from somebody else as extremism if it were to come from the right, you must have enough intellectual consistency to recognize it when it comes from the left, too. This guy is a danger to the United States of America. I want to give you a few more examples that build on what Hasan Piker is saying. So of course, in that video, he's saying that they're openly going to impoverish the white race, they are going to eliminate the white race, they are going to rape the white race, the children, they're going to murder capitalists, they're gonna import so many foreigners that the white race won't no longer exist anymore. These are all things that are repeated by them, but here are some more examples of what they are saying because I don't think people realize exactly the plan of what these people have for And it is right here. America deserved 9/11, we totally brought it upon ourselves, and if you go down here, take a look at this. Oh my God, 9/11 too is going to be so sick. They wanna give a Muslim nation a nuke so that they can nuke America. Wrap your head around that. These people are openly saying that they want Muslim nations to have nukes so that they can wipe America and all of us off the face of the earth. They want us all dead. And then if we continue on here, we have one of our congress members being sexually assaulted in the eyeball, and he's celebrating that. He's saying that raping people on October 7th is acceptable. Hamas is a thousand times better than a fascist settler colony. Landlords and capitalists should both be murdered. Anybody who doesn't support Medicare for All should be killed, even our politicians. Jews are inbred. He's talking about terrorist organizations waving AKs is the best flag ever. And then a couple more points here, but one, the biggest thing that you should really take away here is they are planning on another 9/11. They want nukes to come to American soil to wipe us out. And for some reason, these people aren't only allowed to stay in America, but they are actually running for office, and the people- Around them support this ideology
WallStreetApes
Posted - August 12, 2026 at 12:55 AM
Saved - August 12, 2026 at 12:34 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I reported that at a Minneapolis polling station (Powderhorn Park Recreation Center), an election judge told federal observers they couldn’t stand 100 feet outside. The judge said since it’s in a park, the whole park is the polling place, so observers must stand 100 feet from the park edge. The post adds: “It’s so obvious Democrats are rigging our elections.”

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

An election judge in Minneapolis tells federal observers they aren’t allowed to stand 100 feet outside a polling station The federal observers say they can stand 100 feet from the building of the polling place The election judge says that because the polling location is in a park, the entire park is the polling place. So they can’t stand 100 feet from the building, they must go to the edge of the park and stand 100 feet away from there This is at Powderhorn Park Recreation Center polling station It’s so obvious Democrats are rigging our elections

Video Transcript AI Summary
Amy, the head election judge for 9-2, explains compliance boundaries for observers and campaigning. She states they must be on the sidewalk or beyond and cannot come onto the park area; specifically, they must stay at least 100 feet from the building. When asked whether the “park” means only the park building or the entire park, Amy says it is the whole park as the designated area. Amy offers to call downtown for clarification if needed, but the discussion centers on avoiding an argument while ensuring observers’ ability to check compliance with federal law. She shares a map showing the 100-foot boundary for the group. She clarifies that campaigning is treated as applying to the whole park: observers are “fine outside of that hundred feet.” She adds practical guidance such as not going into the pond and notes that certain areas (like the pond) are wet. The recap explains that Amy interprets Minnesota’s rule to give a buffer extending to the entire polling-place property. The transcript contrasts this with federal election observers’ position that they may stand within 100 feet of the actual polling place building. Amy’s view is that even though the polling place is inside a building, Minnesota law counts the entire park as the polling place with the result that observers cannot be 100 feet from the building; instead, they must be 100 feet from the edge of the park. The transcript cites a statute stating that “No one except election officials, people waiting to register to vote or vote, pollsters may stand within a hundred feet of the building,” and it references Minneapolis election materials noting that polling places on public property have an extended buffer barring observers from the entire property. The conclusion drawn in the transcript is that federal election watchers must stay at the edge of the park and then stand 100 feet back from that boundary, described as being “essentially like in a creek.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Two, one, just find out who you are. Yeah, I love it. Who are you? I'm Amy. I am the head election judge for 9-2. I love it. Perfect. Perfect. So you guys are aware that you have to be on the sidewalk or beyond, that you can't come on too? We have to be a hundred feet from the building. So in the park, because it's specifically the park, is actually the whole park, not just the park building? I just looked at the, I just looked at the statue, and I'm not getting it. Yeah. No, and if you want, I can call downtown, and you can talk to them. No, that's fine. I don't wanna get in an argument with you, but I did look at the I get it, but every building is on land. I'm just trying to establish some kind of a boundary because we don't want to get into an argument over that. No, no, no, I, I'm not arguing about that. And I'm assuming you don't wanna interfere with our ability to check for your compliance with federal law. Oh, not at all. And that's why, see, this is where the buck's not gonna stop. I have somebody, I can call that you wanna talk to, like, if, if you have more questions, I'm Yeah. So, but I do have the map for you guys for your hundred feet. I guess campaigning is the whole park. You guys are fine outside of that hundred feet. Okay. So like halfway down the steps? Don't go into the pond. Yeah, they're wet. I wanna go in the pond. I know, right? I wanna see that. We used to have a really nice tree that was like a hundred feet, but, yeah, I don't know if you wanna take a picture of it. Yeah, I do. Just but yeah, so I learned something new every the state kind of provided this to us. Alright, so just to recap what's going on here, because it's a little confusing to understand, I had to look it up and research it a little bit. So this election judge is saying that they aren't allowed to be observers within a hundred feet of the actual park of the entire area. Now, these observers, these federal observers, they say that they are allowed to be within one hundred feet at the one hundred foot mark of where the actual building is of the polling Polling place of where they're gonna be casting votes, and then the election judge says, "No, in Minnesota, they have a rule that gives them the buffer, and this buffer is that even though the polling place is in the building right next to them, the entire park is counted as the polling place with their law, so that they can't be one hundred feet from the building, they have to be a hundred feet from the edge of the park, if you can believe it. I mean, as wild as that sounds, it's actually the case here." Here is the law, right here is the statute. No one except election officials, people waiting to register to vote or vote, pollsters may stand within a hundred feet of the building, and here is where the law that she's talking about. Minneapolis election materials explicitly note that polling places on public property have an extended buffer banning them from the entire property. So what that means is if the park is the property of the polling place, then it- It's not the building, it is the entire park, the whole area. So these federal election watchers, they can't be anywhere near the building, they have to go to the edge of the park and then stand a hundred feet back from that, so essentially like in a creek is what they're talking about. I mean, you really can't convince me that Democrats aren't rigging elections. There's no reason to have a law like this.
WallStreetApes
Posted - August 11, 2026 at 6:26 PM
Saved - August 12, 2026 at 11:10 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I saw an interviewer ask Hasan Piker when his $2.7M+ West Hollywood home stops being a human necessity and starts reinforcing the system he critiques. He says an ultra-expensive home is fine if you aren’t engaging in “capital accumulation.” But he’s estimated at $35M net worth, ~$4M/year, and made ~$200K/month at peak, while critics argue he’s hoarding wealth and refusing to give it away.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Socialist influencer Hasan Piker defends his $2.7 million+ dollar home in West Hollywood Interviewer “At what point does your very expensive home stop being a basic human necessity and something that essentially reinforces the very system that you're critiquing?” Hasan Piker says that having an extremely expensive home is fine as long as you aren’t engaging in “capital accumulation” Hasan Piker is estimated to have a net worth of $35 million dollars. He makes an estimated $4 million per year on our capitalist system but pushes socialism for everyone else He is the one hoarding wealth and buying multi million dollar homes Yet he refuses to give his money away like a socialist This is a guy who was making $200,000 per month during his peak just on subscriptions alone

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on where expensive personal property stops being a “basic human necessity” and begins to reinforce the system being critiqued. One point is that certain purchases—such as buying a private jet—are “a little different,” and that purchases do not necessarily imply something less ethical if they are not used “to engage in capital accumulation.” The conversation then critiques a specific example: a person who “is pushing socialism” while buying “multi-million dollar homes” in West Hollywood. The person’s stated position is quoted: “It’s okay if I do it, as long as you don’t do capital accumulation.” Capital accumulation is described as having “a very large net worth.” To assess whether the critique applies, the speaker outlines estimates and figures for the person’s financial standing. They say the person’s net worth is estimated at “around twenty to thirty-five million dollars.” They also claim the person’s income is “two point eight million dollars in just a couple years” from “subscriptions and donations,” and that the person averages “in the four plus million dollar range in recent years.” Based on these numbers, the speaker concludes the person is “benefiting pretty well on the capitalist system,” while still “pushing socialism.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
At what point does your very expensive home stop being a basic human necessity and something that essentially reinforces the very system that you're critiquing? I don't think the purchases that you make necessarily-- I mean, if you're buying a private jet, it's a little different, but I don't think the purchases that you make as long as you're not using it to, to engage in capital accumulation imply, you know, something less ethical than, than whatever, whatever purchase you're making in general I have a house. The reason why it's so expensive is because it's in West Hollywood. This guy is pushing socialism, but at the same time, is buying multi-million dollar homes, and his exact words are, "It's okay if I do it, as long as you don't do capital accumulation." Well, capital accumulation means that you have a very large net worth. Let's just see how much he's worth. If we look at his net worth We're looking at around an estimate of twenty to thirty-five million dollars. To me, that seems like you're accumulating a pretty large amount of capital. If we look at his income, he's making two point eight million dollars in just a couple years from things like subscriptions and donations, and if we look at how much does he actually make per year, according to sources, it looks like he averages in the four plus million dollar range in recent years. So that seems to me like he is benefiting pretty- Pretty well on the capitalist system, yet he's pushing socialism.
WallStreetApes
Posted - August 9, 2026 at 11:22 PM
Saved - August 10, 2026 at 3:22 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I see a Flock Condor camera on a golf course with “zero traffic” that uses AI to track humans across an area, panning, moving, and zooming to follow footsteps. This isn’t just license plate readers—it’s building a mass surveillance network.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Just a Flock camera in the middle of a golf course with zero traffic…. This is the Flock Condor Camera. It uses AI to track humans. It can pan, move, even zoom in and follow your every footstep. It specifically tracks humans across an area When are we going to acknowledge this isn’t about license plate readers. This is about establishing the mass surveillance network in America

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says they have a “Flock camera” that is not a license plate reader and asks viewers to pay close attention to its shape. They zoom in on the camera and then go to Flock’s actual webpage describing its cameras. They state that the camera on the pole is a “Condor camera.” According to the speaker, this camera is not used to detect license plates; it is used to detect humans. They cite Flock’s description: the “Flock Condor camera” is used for “AI human detection,” with built-in software that automatically records and tracks pedestrian movement across the scene. The speaker adds that the camera can pan, zoom in, and follow human movement. They conclude that this makes it “not about license plate reading,” noting that the camera is not positioned near a car and is instead located in a golf course. They further claim that this is “way beyond” what they were told about the cameras, stating it is for human tracking and describing it as a mass surveillance network, “just like China has.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
This is a flog camera, but it's not a license plate reader. Pay very close attention to the shape of this camera. I'm gonna zoom in here. Alright, you see it? I'm gonna go to flog's actual webpage, and this is where they describe the different cameras that they have. The one on this pole is actually a condor camera. This camera isn't used to detect license plates. This is to detect humans. And here you go, the Flock Condor camera is used for AI human detection. The built-in software automatically records and tracks pedestrian movement across the scene. It can pan, zoom in, and follow human movement. So, this isn't about license plate reading, and this is why it isn't anywhere near a car, it's just in a golf course. So, this is way beyond what we were told they were gonna be. This is for human tracking, this is a mass surveillance network, just like China has.
WallStreetApes
Posted - August 5, 2026 at 7:45 PM
Saved - August 8, 2026 at 6:33 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m telling you: I’ve got confirmation that WOW Airlines in America are using “surveillance pricing.” One JetBlue customer says their ticket price doubled in a day because airline data showed they were flying for a funeral. The exchange on X describes prices rising person by person, and I found the original post—JetBlue allegedly deleted their comment and the evidence.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOW 🚨 Airlines in America are using “surveillance pricing” CONFIRMED One JetBlue customer had the price of their plane ticket double in one day because the data the airline collected showed they were flying for a funeral “This is one of the biggest scams in American history. Do you think that it would be fine to double or triple the price of an airline ticket for someone flying to a funeral? There was a disturbing incident that played out on X, that shed some light, I think, on how airlines are using surveillance pricing in real time right in front of us. I think I've got the relevant exchange over my shoulder here. (SEE VIDEO IT’S WILD) “$230 price increase. They're gonna figure out how they can rip you off one person at a time. They're not gonna charge you the same fare they charge your neighbor. They're not gonna charge you the same fare as the guy sitting next to you in the seat. They're gonna figure out how they can bilk you out of every dime they're willing to pay every time you step on an airline” “It's gonna be the grocery stores and everybody else until we figure out how to bring transparency, how to bring honesty and some protections for the American consumer” “This is one of the biggest scams in American history” I went and found the original post and can confirm JetBlue is trying to hide that they are using surveillance pricing because they deleted their comment. The evidence was deleted

Video Transcript AI Summary
A disturbance on X (Twitter) described airlines using “surveillance pricing” in real time, with the claim that prices are adjusted to “rip you off one person at a time.” The transcript cites an example from April of this year: an X user said that while booking travel for a funeral on JetBlue, they saw a $230 pricing increase in one day. The discussion frames this as evidence that airlines “figure out how they can bilk you out of every dime” rather than charging the same fare to nearby passengers. The transcript claims the relevant exchange can be seen in the original post and notes that JetBlue deleted their response. It says the poster commented that JetBlue’s price increase after one day was “crazy” and that they were trying to get to a funeral. The transcript adds that, in the post’s like/comments section, there are only three comments, which are described as indicating that the response was removed; it says the “relevant exchange” is “over my shoulder.” In the account of the JetBlue response, the transcript states that JetBlue advised: “Try clearing your cache and cookies and booking with an incognito window.” The transcript interprets this as a request to hide who someone is and their online persona in order to obtain a reasonably priced ticket, and it concludes by labeling the situation a scam.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
This is one of the biggest scams in American history. Do you think that it would be fine to double or triple the price of an airline ticket for someone flying to a funeral? There was a, a disturbing incident that played out on Twitter on X that shed some light, I think, on how airlines are using surveillance pricing in real time right in front of us. I think I've got the relevant exchange over my shoulder here. You have an X user who in April, this is April of this year, posted that he had seen a two hundred and thirty dollar pricing correction Increase in one day when he was booking travel for a funeral on JetBlue, two hundred, two hundred and thirty dollar price increase. They're gonna figure out how they can rip you off one person at a time. They're not gonna charge you the same fare they charge your neighbor, they're not gonna charge you the same fare as the guy sitting next to you in the seat. They're gonna figure out how they can bilk you out of every dime they're willing to pay every time you step on an airline. And it's not just gonna be them, it's gonna be the grocery stores and everybody else How to bring transparency, how to bring honesty and some protections for the American consumer. You're not gonna believe this, I found the post on X and JetBlue actually deleted their response, so here it is. I love flying JetBlue, but a two hundred and thirty increase on a ticket after one day is crazy. I'm trying to make it to a funeral and they actually deleted it. If you go to the post, you go to likes. You know, there's only three comments, so you can very clearly tell that this comment is gone. And here's the post right here, I love flying JetBlue, same post, here it is. Try clearing your cache and cookies and booking with an incognito window. So they want you to hide who you are and your persona online so that you can just get a reasonably priced ticket. This is a scam, what a joke.
WallStreetApes
Posted - August 3, 2026 at 9:17 PM
Saved - August 8, 2026 at 5:31 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I watch closely as Nick Shirley shows the military escorting illegal migrants off the mountain into Ceuta, Spain. He says there are no mothers or children—only military fighting-aged men—asking where the women are and claiming it was a coordinated planned invasion.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Nick Shirley catches the military leading illegal migrants off the mountain and down into Ceuta, Spain NOT A SINGLE MOTHER AND CHILD Watch very closely, the entire group is 100% military fighting aged men Where are all the women?? This was a coordinated planned invasion https://t.co/BiEkoazXLZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript describes the Spanish military escorting and pushing a group of migrants down a mountain. Multiple groups of men are shown being walked down and escorted by Spanish military personnel, while police move in as part of a push to get everyone down the mountain. The speaker repeatedly notes that no women are visible, emphasizing that the groups appear to consist entirely of men. The speaker focuses on a “zoomed in view” and instructs viewers to look carefully for women or children. They claim that aside from “this one girl here,” there is not a single woman or child elsewhere in the groups. As the speaker continues past Nick Shirley, they again describe the people as “all military fighting aged men,” stating that the rest of the group passes with “not a single woman anywhere” and “not a child anywhere.” The transcript frames these actions as the Spanish military “starting to do something about” what the speaker calls a worsening migrant crisis, depicting people as fleeing down the mountain and being pushed down by the Spanish military while police approach from above. Near the end, the speaker states a “big question” about where the women and children are, then returns to the claim that the visible groups contain only men (and only one girl). The transcript concludes by asserting that the coordination is intended to “overwhelm their system,” and claims that, like in the United States and the United Kingdom, these people “are going to be used for votes.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
And now right here, it looks like the military has grabbed a group of the guys that were up in the mountain. Now they're all coming down, being walked down the mountain right now. And once again, not a single woman in sight. It's all just a group of men right here, all being escorted down the mountain from the Spanish military. There's another group. Back there as well. And right here in the mountains, we have another group of people who are getting pushed down the mountain from the Spanish military. It looks like the Spanish military, the Spaniards, are starting to do something about this migrant crisis. It has gotten really, really bad. All of you are now fleeing, coming down the mountain, being pushed down from the Spanish military, and the police are coming up right now. As the police made a push to get everyone down the mountain. Alright, the big question here is where are the women and children? We see the military guy leading them down the mountain here and aiding them. Let's just take a look. This is a zoomed in view. All men, all men. Let's go pretty slowly. Take a look. There isn't a single woman or child aside from this one girl here. So pay attention to her and let's see if there's a single other woman or child. There's not. We'll go past Nick Shirley. Take a look. Here's a View of them all military fighting aged men. Where are the women and children? These are all men. Look at this, the rest of the group goes by and there's not a single woman anywhere, not a child anywhere. This is very clearly coordinated, they're gonna overwhelm their system and guaranteed, just like in America and just like in the UK, all these people are going to be used for votes.
WallStreetApes
Posted - August 1, 2026 at 8:39 PM
Saved - August 8, 2026 at 3:45 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m seeing claims that “smart dust” is real and documented, with lab prototypes and MEMS sensors already existing. It was originally conceived as a weapon for airborne sensor networks. UC Berkeley later expanded it into “Stim Dust,” reportedly using ultrasound-powered implants to control nerve function in live rodents. They now frame it as medical, but the control angle still worries me.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

‘Conspiracy theorists’ are right again Smart Dust and even an expansion of it are real, documented and have been tested “Smart dust, dust-sized cameras floating around like dandelion seeds, was originally conceived as a weapon. The idea was that helicopters and drones could drop smart dust into the air, and that would serve as a battlefield sensor network. Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley announced they'd expanded on the concept by creating something called Stim Dust. Stim Dust gives the operator control over your nervous system. According to a press release, Stim Dust has, quote, opened the door for wireless communication to the brain and peripheral nervous system through tiny implantable devices inside body that are powered by ultrasound. The researchers successfully implanted stimdust in a live rodent. They were able by doing this to, quote, control hind leg motion. Today the world is watching you. Tomorrow the world could be controlling you like a video game character” Now they say this StimDust is actually meant for medical purposes. The researches say they hope the work can lead to applications of StimDust to treat diseases such as heart irregularities, chronic pain, asthma and epilepsy So on one hand you have a genuine medical purpose something like this could be used for, on the other hand you know how evil the government and globalists are and you’re right to be worried about technology like this The original smart dust is real too Smart Dust is the 1990s–2000s idea from Kris Pister and others at Berkeley: swarms of tiny autonomous sensors with sensing, computing and wireless communication Lab prototypes of this Smart Dust exist and specialized MEMS sensors have existed for years

Video Transcript AI Summary
Smart Dust—dust-sized cameras floating like dandelion seeds—was originally conceived as a weapon, using helicopters and drones to drop it into the air as a battlefield sensor network. Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley said they expanded the concept by creating “StimDust,” which provides the operator control over the nervous system, according to a press release. The researchers described StimDust as “opened the door for wireless communication to the brain and peripheral nervous system through tiny,” and said they successfully implanted “stem dust” in a live rodent. They reported that, after implantation, they were able to “control hind leg motion.” The transcript cites UC Berkeley materials showing a rat with the device intended for implantation, and describes tests in which the device was implanted and later triggered to control the rat’s movement. The transcript also notes that the video contains graphic content that the speaker skips. The researchers’ stated motivation is broader than control, according to the transcript. They hope the technology can lead to applications of smart dust used to treat diseases and conditions including heart irregularities, chronic pain, asthma, and epilepsy. The transcript contrasts these potential medical uses with concerns about what could happen if governments or other actors gained control over a system that can control nerves and motor functions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Smart Dust, dust-sized cameras floating around like dandelion seeds, was originally conceived as a weapon. The idea was that helicopters and drones could drop Smart Dust into the air, and that would serve as a battlefield sensor network. Researchers at the University of California, Berkeley announced they'd expanded on the concept by creating something called StimDust. StimDust gives the operator control over your nervous system, according to a press release. StimDust has, quote, "opened the door for wireless communication to the brain and peripheral nervous system through tiny. Any implantable devices inside the body that are powered by ultrasound, the researchers successfully implanted stem dust in a live rodent. They were able by doing this to, quote, "control hind leg motion. "Today the world is watching you, tomorrow the world could be controlling you like a video game character. " This right here is from UC Berkeley, this is one of their videos. You can see they have their rat right here. This is gonna be the device that they're gonna implant, and they're going to use this device here to trigger the device and control the rat, and they actually do do that here Device being actually implanted. And right here, if you go further in the video, it's a little bit graphic, so I'll kind of skip these parts, but you can see that they actually did this test. and right here, they shock it. But again, it's a little bit graphic, so I'm not gonna show it on X. But they were successful in doing this, so why are they doing this is the big question. The researchers that are doing this are hoping this can lead to applications of smart dust used to treat diseases like heart irregularities, chronic pain, asthma, and epilepsy For this that they're saying, so that it's not just being made to control people, you know, they actually want to help with diseases. But on the other hand, if the government gets in control of these kind of things or globalists, we know these people are very evil, and it is very right to be cautious of what they could do with something that can literally control your nerves and your motor functions.
WallStreetApes
Posted - July 31, 2026 at 3:47 AM
Saved - August 8, 2026 at 2:58 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m telling you: Western nations must learn how Europeans launched the Crusades against expanding Muslim conquest. Muslim armies took Christian lands like Syria, Palestine, Egypt, North Africa, and much of Spain, then reached France. Under dhimma, Christians were treated as second-class, forced to pay jizya, and if they couldn’t, families were seized as slave-tax payment; refusals to convert meant extreme violence and beheadings.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Everyone in Western Nations NEEDS to know this information This is why the Crusades were launched by Europeans against Muslims who were being brutally conquering Christian nations “Muslim armies had conquered Christian Syria, Palestine, Egypt, the whole of North Africa, and most of Spain and Portugal. They crossed the Pyrenees into France and were checked at the Battle of Tours in 732 “What life actually looked like for Christians living under this expanding rule of Islam is something that tends to get neglected. The system governing Christian life across the conquered territories was called the dhimma, which was a legal framework that essentially classified non-Muslims as second-class citizens, and they were subjected to extreme violence if they resisted” “The jizya, which was a sort of poll tax payable specifically by non-Muslims, Muslims as a mark of subordinate status, was levied across the conquered territories. Now, what happened if you couldn't pay it? — they forced the Christians to hand over their wives and children as slaves to the Arab army as part of tax payment” “The slave raiding of Christian populations in Spain and North Africa would continue for centuries” Prominent Christians documented countless beheadings for the crime of saying refusing to convert to Islam Bill Warner from the Center for the Study of Political Islam cites an estimate for the amount of people Muslims killed: - 60 million Christians - 80 million Hindus - 10 million Buddhists - 120 million Africans List of Christian territories brutally taken over be Muslims: - Syria - Palestine - Lebanon - Jordan - Iraq - Egypt - Libya - Tunisia - Algeria - Morocco

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that when people call the Crusades “unprovoked European aggression,” they should consider what occurred in the centuries before Pope Urban II called for them in 1095. By 1095, “the map of the Christian world” had been “violently redrawn.” Within a century of Muhammad’s death, Muslim armies are described as conquering Christian Syria, Palestine, Egypt, all of North Africa, and most of Spain and Portugal. The speaker adds that Muslim forces crossed the Pyrenees into France and were checked at the Battle of Tours in 732 by Charles Martel. The speaker also claims Constantinople was besieged twice, with the second siege reportedly involving around 200,000 men and failing “only just.” The speaker says the lived experience of Christians under expanding Muslim rule is “neglected,” describing a legal system called the Dimma that “classified non-Muslims as second class citizens” and subjected them to “extreme violence” if they resisted. The speaker states that the jizya, a poll tax payable by non-Muslims, was levied across the conquered territories, and asks what happened if it could not be paid. As an example, the speaker says that after Amr conquered Tripoli in Libya in 643 AD, Christians were forced to hand over their wives and children as slaves to the Arab army as part of taxation. The speaker says slave raiding of Christian populations in Spain and North Africa continued for centuries, creating long-lasting demographic change that reduced some Christian populations to minority status and, in some regions, led to disappearance, “like in Arabia.” The speaker cites Eulogius of Córdoba, a priest and scholar, who recorded executions of 48 Christians in Córdoba between 850 and 859 AD, most beheaded under the emirs Abdurrahman II and Muhammad I for blasphemy and apostasy under Islamic law; the speaker says Eulogius was beheaded in 859 AD. The speaker then presents the immediate trigger for the First Crusade as following the Battle of Manzikert in 1071, when the Seljuk Turks are said to have destroyed the Byzantine army and swept across Anatolia. The speaker claims returning pilgrims reported harassment, robbery, violence, and murder, and that in 1095 Byzantine Emperor Alexius I formally asked Pope Urban II for Western military help. The speaker states that “roughly two thirds” of the land that had been Christian at the time of the first Islamic conquest had been taken before the First Crusade was launched. The speaker says this “doesn’t excuse everything that came after,” and notes that the massacres, opportunism, and the Crusader sack of Constantinople in 1204 are “a stain.” The speaker argues that explaining these earlier events shows what Urban II was “responding to” and why “hundreds of thousands of people” answered his call. The speaker then shifts to modern claims, stating that Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam estimates “60 million Christians” were killed, “80 million Hindus” were killed, “10 million Buddhists” were killed, and “120 million Africans as a whole” were killed, and adds that this was “in the name of Islam,” with “hundreds and hundreds of thousands of slaves.” The speaker claims the same process is occurring now, describing Muslims invading Western countries and stating, “Crusades will have to come back.” They also claim that prominent people say Britain is being “overrun,” that births by Muslims outnumber births to other religions, and that mayors controlling funding in capital cities are Muslim. The speaker points to mosque construction in Scotland and references Minneapolis and Dearborn, Michigan, describing “blue centers” with “multiple occupancy.” They say they will not claim “we’re done” because they are still “fighting,” and suggest a future in which British people will face choices: flee eastwards to Eastern Europe with stronger Christian neighbors (Poland, Hungary), seek asylum in America, or “stand their ground,” stating again that the time of the Crusades will need to come back “if we are to return.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Every time someone tells you the Crusades were an act of unprovoked European aggression, ask them what happened in the three hundred and fifty years before Pope Urban II stood up at Clermont and called for them. You see, by 1095, the map of the Christian world was being violently redrawn. Within a century of Muhammad's death, Muslim armies had conquered Christian Syria, Palestine, Egypt, the whole of North Africa, and most of Spain and Portugal. They crossed the Pyrenees into France and were checked at the Battle of Tours in 732 by Charles Martel. Constantinople itself was besieged twice, with the second siege in seventeen to seventeen, involving around two hundred thousand men, and in the end, it failed, but only just. And what life actually looked like for Christians living under this expanding rule of Islam is something that tends to get neglected. The system governing Christian life across the conquered territories was called the Dimma, which was a legal framework that essentially classified non-Muslims as second class citizens, and they were subjected to extreme violence if they resisted. The jizya, which was a sort of poll tax payable specifically by non-Muslims as a mark of subordinate status, was levied across the conquered territories. Now, what happened if you couldn't pay it? When Amr conquered Tripoli in Libya in 643 AD, he forced the Christians to hand over their wives and children as slaves to the Arab army as part of tax The slave raiding of Christian populations in Spain and North Africa would continue for centuries, and this had a long lasting impact because over the generations, this created a steady demographic change that gradually reduced many Christian populations to minority status, and in some regions, they eventually disappeared completely, like in Arabia. In Spain, Eulogius of Córdoba, who was a priest and scholar, recorded the executions of forty-eight Christians in the city between 850 and 859 AD. Most were beheaded under the emirs Abdurrahman II and Muhammad I for blasphemy. And apostasy under Islamic law. In other words, they denounced Islam and refused forced conversion. Eulogius himself was beheaded in 859 AD. So the immediate trigger for the First Crusade was after the Battle of Manzikert in 1071, where the Seljuk Turks destroyed the Byzantine army and swept across Anatolia. Pilgrims returning to Europe brought reports of harassment, robbery, violence, and murder, and by 1095, the Byzantine Emperor Alexius I formally asked Pope Urban II for Western military help. Roughly two Two thirds of the land that had been Christian at the time of the first Islamic conquest had been taken before the first Crusade was ever launched. None of this makes everything that happened during the Crusades justifiable. The massacres, the opportunism, the sack of Constantinople by Crusaders in twelve o four are certainly a stain on that legacy. But presenting the Crusades as unprovoked act of aggression requires you to bury your head in the sand and ignore three and a half centuries of military conquest, a documented system of legal discrimination against Christian populations, slavery, and a formal Request for help from the Byzantine emperor himself doesn't excuse everything that came after, but it does explain what Urban II was responding to and why hundreds of thousands of people answered his call. This right here is the reason for the Crusades, and here are all the countries that used to be Christian countries that were taken over by Muslims, by Islam. Here's everywhere in the Middle East, all of these countries used to be Christian. If you look over here in Egypt and North Africa, all of these countries also used to be Christian. But they were taken over by Muslim extremists who were conquering it for Muhammad and Allah. They were beheading people, they were doing extremely horrible things, including rape to the women and children. And how many people did they kill? That's one of the biggest questions. Well, we do have an estimate here. This estimate comes from Bill Warner from the Center for the Study of Political Islam. He estimates that sixty million Christians were killed, eighty million Hindus were killed, ten million Buddhists were killed, and a hundred Twenty million Africans as a whole were killed. This was all in the name of Islam, and they took hundreds and hundreds of thousands of slaves. But you don't read about any of this. But right now, we are being conquered by Islam, the same thing is taking place. They are invading all over Western countries. Crusades will have to come back. Some very prominent people are saying the exact same thing that we are being overrun by Muslims and the Crusades will have to come back, it's the only way to stop it. And demographically, because we are already overrun, power sits with the Muslim religion, power sits with Muslim leaders. Are you done? And the government, is the, is the nation done? You know, I'll never say we're done, because we're still here fighting. I believe there will come a time, not too far from now, when the British people, true British people, will have to make very difficult choices. Either they will flee eastwards to Eastern Europe with our much more stronger Christian neighbors, Poland, Hungary those countries, or they will seek asylum, flee, try to come to America, or they will stand their ground But certainly, the time of the Crusades will need to come again if we are to return. What do you mean by that? We are overrun in every way, in every sense, demographically, all births Muslim births outnumber births to every in all other religion. This isn't no commentary on anyone's religion, I'm just-- This is just pure fact. Our mayors, who control funding in our capital cities, are Muslim. Mosques aren't churches, and a mosque is being built at the outermost Tippy tippy most end of Scotland, and at the furthest reaches at the end of the other side of our tiny country. This is about a takeover, and of course, America understands, because you have Minneapolis, because you have Dearborn, Michigan, and I see it all the time. These blue centers where they absolutely load it up with multiple occupancy
WallStreetApes
Posted - July 30, 2026 at 4:28 AM
Saved - August 8, 2026 at 1:42 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m pointing out that Anthony Fauci allegedly wrote in his diary that COVID’s fatality rate was about “0.2–0.3%” (not “2.0%”), describing it as more like a bad influenza in transmissibility. I’m asking why he won’t admit he misled the public, mishandled COVID, and pushed vaccines.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

🚨 Anthony Fauci literally wrote in his diary Covid was only a 0.2% fatality rate Anthony Fauci is confronted over writing in his diary that Covid 19 was essentially just the flu but then and locked down for a global pandemic and mandated vaccines “Dr. Fauci, you admitted in your own diary that COVID was nothing more than a flu — Are you ever going to admit that you killed millions of people through your poison shots? — When are you going to take responsibility for your mishandling of COVID Dr. Fauci?“ Here is exactly what was written in Anthony Fauci’s diary “acting like a bad influenza in its transmissibility” “and that the case fatality rate was “more like 0.2-0.3% rather than 2.0%.” It’s time to arrest Anthony Fauci for crimes against humanity He literally wrote that Covid only had a 0.2% fatally rate and then tried everything possible to force everyone to get these experimental dangerous vaccines

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript questions Dr. Fauci about statements attributed to his own diary regarding COVID-19. The speaker asks whether Dr. Fauci regrets shutting down the world, whether he will admit “killed millions of people” through “poison shots,” and when he will take responsibility for “mishandling of COVID.” The speaker claims the “evidence” is written by Anthony Fauci in his diary, stating that the COVID virus was acting like a “bad influenza” in its transmissibility. The transcript further states that the diary describes the case fatality rate as “more like point two percent,” specifically “zero point two percent rather than two percent.” The speaker asserts that this means Dr. Fauci knew the fatality rate was “extremely low.” The transcript compares these figures to the flu: it states that “the fatality rate of the flu” is “one percent,” and then adds that the flu is “zero point one percent,” while COVID is “zero point two percent,” presenting COVID as extremely close to the flu in fatality rate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Dr. Fauci, you admitted in your own diary that COVID was nothing more than a flu. Do you regret shutting the world down? Are you ever going to admit that you killed millions of people through your poison shots? When are you going to take responsibility for your mishandling of COVID? When are you going to take responsibility for your mishandling of COVID, Dr. Fauci? Here's the evidence for that, directly written by Anthony Fauci in his diary, the COVID virus was acting like a bad influenza in its transmissibility, and that the case fatality rate was more like point two percent. Zero point two percent rather than two percent. So he knew that the fatality rate was extremely low, and what is the fatality rate of the flu? Well, that is one percent. So it is extremely close. The flu is zero point one percent, COVID is zero point two percent.
WallStreetApes
Posted - July 29, 2026 at 5:18 PM
Saved - August 8, 2026 at 12:23 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m saying Anthony Fauci refused to answer questions over 106 times in today’s Senate Homeland Security hearing. I’m citing claims from the International Crisis Summit that Covid mRNA injections killed about 17 million people. I’m framing this as why he won’t answer even simple questions, and I’m calling for his prosecution.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Anthony Fauci refused to answer questions more than 106 times in today’s Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing This is why Anthony Fauci is refusing to answer any questions: The International Crisis Summit compiled data for Covid 19 vaccine deaths and found the vaccine killed 17 MILLION PEOPLE “COVID 19 mRNA genetic injections have killed 17,000,000 people. Yep. Absolutely stunning. Can you please tell us more about the paper? That's the global number” “The number we extract from our analysis allows us to calculate the toxicity of the vaccine for all ages and the number allows us, given the number of doses that have been given worldwide, to conclude that 17,000,000 people would have been killed by this vaccine” This is why Anthony Fauci won’t even answer what color tie he’s wearing. He committed crimes against humanity and they can’t be pardoned Prosecute Anthony Fauci

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript states that “the COVID-19 mRNA genetic injections have killed seventeen million people,” and describes this as the “global number.” The speaker says they “studied many countries in Latin America and in the equatorial regions,” to provide what they call “a representative sample of the world.” The transcript also claims that “many injections” amount to “ten percent of the world population” and discusses the proportion of injections as “nine percent of injections” (or “the other way around”). According to the speaker, “the number we extract from our analysis” allows them to “calculate the toxicity of the vaccine for all ages,” and then—using “the number of doses that have been given worldwide”—they “conclude that seventeen million people would have been killed by this vaccine.” The transcript emphasizes that the analysis includes timing “by week or by month and by age group,” which the speaker says makes it possible “to actually see when there’s a rollout of a booster.” The transcript claims that, after each rollout for a given age group, there is “immediately following it” a “maximum in the all-cause mortality,” described as “an excess mortality” peak. It adds that the speaker “see[s] that repeatedly for each rollout, consistently across all countries,” provided there is “sufficient data” and that both “the vaccine data” and “the mortality data” are available. The transcript then turns to a discussion of an appearance at a hearing, stating that “we just heard that 17 million people died from the COVID vaccine,” and asks what Anthony Fauci would answer when he goes into the hearing. The transcript asserts that he answered “absolutely nothing, and that’s exactly what he did.” It presents a sequence of questions and answers from the hearing. When asked “What day of the week is it today?” the transcript says Fauci responded: “On the advice of counsel I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” When asked “What color tie you wearin’?” the response is the same: “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.” When asked “What color’s the carpet in front of you?” the transcript again reports the same Fifth Amendment refusal. The transcript then continues with a rebuttal from another person, stating: “You don’t have any rights under the Fifth Amendment because you’ve been pardoned,” and cites “Brown versus Walker, eighteen ninety-six,” claiming that when someone “has been pardoned, he may not stand upon his privilege.” The transcript concludes by saying the refusal “isn’t about the Constitution, this isn’t about the law, this is about contempt,” and claims it is contempt “for this body and contempt for the American people,” and says that if someone “killed seventeen million people with the COVID vaccine,” they “probably wouldn’t even answer the color of your tie in front of Congress because you know that you are guilty.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
The COVID-19 mRNA genetic injections have killed seventeen million people. Yep. Absolutely stunning. Can you please tell us more about the paper? That's the global number. we studied many countries in Latin America and in the equatorial regions, so we have a representative sample of the world, we believe. Many injections, it's what, it's ten percent of the world population, yep, nine percent of injections, or the other way around? So the number we extract from our analysis Allows us, we, we calculate the toxicity of the vaccine for all ages, and the number allows us, given the number of doses that have been given worldwide, to conclude that seventeen million people would have been killed by this vaccine. And having it by time, like by week or by month and by age group, means that you can actually see when there's a rollout of a booster, for example, which happens very quickly in time for a given age group, you can actually see immediately following it. The, a, a maximum in the all-cause mortality, so an excess mortality actual peak that's temporally associated with that rollout, and we see that repeatedly for each rollout, consistently across all countries, all the countries that have sufficient data where you're able to look at it and you have both the vaccine data and the mortality data, this is what we see. We just heard that 17 million people died from the COVID vaccine, so naturally, when Anthony Fauci goes into this hearing today, what do you think he's gonna answer? Absolutely nothing, and that's exactly what he did. Let's try something. What day of the week is it today? On the advice of counsel I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. What color tie you wearin'? On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. What color's the carpet in front of you? On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Let's just get one thing straight. You don't have any rights under the Fifth Amendment because you've been pardoned, as you very well know. As the Supreme Court has been clear for a century and more, Brown versus Walker, eighteen ninety-six, when he has been pardoned, he may not stand upon his privilege. You know that. Your lawyers sitting behind you now, shifting nervously in their chairs, they know it. This isn't about the Constitution, this isn't about the law, this is about contempt. Contempt for this body and contempt for the American people. So naturally, if you killed seventeen million people with the COVID vaccine, which is found in that data You too probably wouldn't even answer the color of your tie in front of Congress because you know that you are guilty.
WallStreetApes
Posted - July 26, 2026 at 1:50 PM
Saved - August 7, 2026 at 8:48 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I saw a Texas Muslim social studies teacher claim that trying to villainize Islam in American classrooms won’t work, saying suppression spreads Islam and Islam is the fastest growing faith in Texas, the U.S., and worldwide. She then prays to Allah. I’m alarmed, calling it mass indoctrination and saying Muslims have infiltrated classrooms.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOW 🚨 Muslim social studies teacher in Texas says that villainizing Islam in American schools isn’t going to work, she says Islam will take over America as the dominant religion This is who is teaching American children, very clear mass indoctrination into being pro-Islam “I'm going to say this straight up: the more you try to suppress and villainize Islam in the classroom, the more you are doing Islam a favor. Because right now, today, on the ground, Islam is the fastest growing religion in Texas, the United States, and in the world. Suppression doesn't shrink a faith, it spreads it. And you are proving that in real time” She then does a Muslim prayer and prays to Allah We need to mass depot Islam from America while we still can. Muslims have literally infiltrated the classrooms as teachers

Video Transcript AI Summary
Anshira Daher, a Palestinian American Muslim social studies teacher and history major in Texas, describes herself as having taught elementary through high school for nearly fifteen years. She argues that children need to learn how to think before being taught about falsehoods, and she says attempting to suppress or villainize Islam in the classroom instead benefits Islam by spreading it. She claims Islam is the fastest growing religion in Texas, in the United States, and in the world. She also says suppression does not shrink a faith. Daher ends with a du’a to “Oh Allah, make us among those who speak the truth and bear witness with justice. Amin.” A “point of order” follows. The speaker states the topic was not germane, then responds that Al Qaeda is mentioned because Al Qaeda killed three thousand Americans on 9/11 and that many veterans, including a chairman mentioned by the speaker, fought Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. The speaker also says the actions of the panel or state board should not be threatened, characterizing Daher's claims as ridiculous, and asserts that Islam will not take over in the United States. The transcript then reflects that another participant interprets Daher's remarks as saying teaching negative things about Islam or suppressing it in Texas schools will not work, and that Islam will become dominant in America, in Texas, and in the West, concluding that it would end in Sharia law. The transcript says this is a clear statement of her desire for Islam to take over America. Finally, the transcript summarizes public comments, including calls for Daher's firing and license revocation. One comment claims “Islam isn’t ideology, not a religion,” and asserts that Islam is “a society” and “government,” describing it as a set of rules that require living by them “so that is, by definition, government.” Other comments demand revocation of her license immediately, say “wake up America,” and call for removing her by “mass deport” while also stating “Jesus Christ is king.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Islam is the fastest growing religion in Texas, the United States, and in the world. My name is Anshira Daher. I am a history major and a proud Palestinian American Muslim social studies teacher in Texas. I've taught elementary through high school students for almost fifteen years. These children can't yet distinguish a fact from an opinion, and we want to dump Al Qaeda On fourth graders. Before you teach a child about falsehoods, you have to teach them how to think, and I'm gonna say this straight up. The more you try to suppress and villainize Islam in the classroom, the more you are doing Islam a favor. Because right now, today on the ground, Islam is the fastest growing religion in Texas, the United States, and in the world. Suppression doesn't shrink a faith, it spreads it, and you are proving that in real time. I want to end with a du'a. Oh Allah, make us among those who speak the truth and bear witness with justice. Amin. Point of order. What's your point of order? It wasn't germane to the topic posted. I believe the time's expired. Yes the last testifier, yeah, it's, it's not mentioned for any, you said it was for a political agenda that Al Qaeda's mentioned there. It's mentioned because Al Qaeda killed three thousand Americans on 9/11, and many of our veterans, including our great chairman here, put their lives on the line fighting Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. So that's a big, significant part of American history, and you need to understand that as a teacher, and you also need to understand you can't come and threaten the state board of education that what we do here is because that's ridiculous. And you know what? You may have the wind at your back, but we serve the one true God, and it runs into a brick wall right here in the United States of America. Islam will not take over. I hope everyone understood what this Muslim woman just said. She said that she's a teacher. She's saying that teaching negative things about Islam or suppressing Islam in general in Texas schools isn't going to work. She says that no matter what, Islam is going to be the dominant religion in America, in Texas, in the West. Yes, and they are going to take over. She ends with a prayer to Allah. So, I mean, she's making a very clear statement here that she wants Islam to take over America, and this only ends in Sharia law. Let's just take a look at what the public has to say, and the best way to gauge that is by the comments. She should be fired. Islam isn't ideology, not a religion. One thing you need to understand is so many prominent people have pointed this out, Islam isn't a religion. Islam is a society. Islam is government. They put forth a very clear set of rules that you must live by, so that is, by definition, government. Revok her license, do it now, wake up America. Time to squash this belief Jesus Christ is king. I would pull my kid so fast, fire her. She needs to be fired immediately. Everyone is saying the same thing. We can't tolerate this. We need to mass deport this.
WallStreetApes
Posted - July 23, 2026 at 12:34 AM
Saved - July 23, 2026 at 9:53 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I feel like I’ve reached a new level of “awakening.” I normally feared being labeled anti-vax, but I don’t care anymore because, after researching vaccine inserts and sources myself, I say vaccines use cell lines originally derived from elective abortions, with trace DNA potentially remaining. I cite why these lines were selected in the 1960s and mention religious exemptions and Vatican concerns.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American nurse says “I don’t care anymore.” She’s learned the truth about our vaccines system and she’s speaking out “I feel like I've just unlocked a new level of awakening, and normally I would be so scared to talk about vaccines because someone's gonna label me anti-vax, but I literally don't care anymore because the truth is out there and it's right in front of our faces” “You can look on the inserts and it's literally aborted fetuses in the vaccine ingredient list and all these other animal cells — I looked everything up myself and it's all true — long story short, Roe v. Wade was not meant for women's rights — The propaganda is real. It all makes sense, and it's so disgusting that they're using aborted fetuses to make our vaccines” “Anyone who thinks otherwise, like, I don't care anymore. Yes, I'm anti-vaccine.” She’s telling the truth, aborted fetus are used for our vaccines. Using human cell lines originally derived from elective abortions in the 1960s. Now today these are immortalized cell lines maintained in labs The viruses are grown in these cells, then purified. Trace DNA may remain in minute amounts This is why there is legitimate cause for religious exemption These cell lines were chosen in the 1960s because they grow viruses well in a sterile environment Major religious bodies including the Vatican have addressed moral concerns I included examples of current vaccines still using this method

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says they feel they have “unlocked a new level of awakening” and that they no longer fear being labeled anti-vax. They claim “the truth is out there,” pointing to vaccine “inserts” that they say show “aborted fetuses” in vaccine ingredient lists, along with “other animal cells.” Speaker 1 says they watched a “two hour lecture” that “broke it down” in a “factual” way by timeline and “connected the dots,” and that they then looked everything up themselves and found “it’s all true.” They describe their conclusion about Roe v. Wade, saying Roe v. Wade “was not meant for women’s rights,” was “not made to protect women and their bodies,” and was instead not intended to give women the opportunity to have an abortion “if they need it.” They also say “the propaganda is real,” that it “all makes sense,” and that it is “disgusting” to use “aborted fetuses” to make vaccines. Speaker 1 then says that anyone who thinks otherwise, “I don’t care anymore,” and ends by saying “yes I’m anti-vaccine.” Speaker 0 responds by stating that “unfortunately what this nurse is saying is true.” Speaker 0 claims that vaccines “currently used in the U.S.” are “produced using human cells,” and that these cell lines were “originally derived from abortions.” They add that this began “in the 1960s,” and that “the viruses are grown in these cells and purified” with “trace DNA” that “may remain in very small minute amounts.” Speaker 0 says this is “why there is very good cause for religious exemptions for a lot of vaccines” and states that major religious bodies, including “the Vatican,” addressed these “moral concerns.” Speaker 0 lists examples of vaccines they say still use these cell lines: “the MMR vaccine,” “the chickenpox vaccine,” “hepatitis A,” and “rabies.” They also say “some of the COVID-19 vaccines also use it.” Speaker 0 emphasizes that religious exemptions were “so important,” adding that “some Democrat states” tried to deny them. Speaker 0 concludes by saying that while “a lot of vaccines do not use them,” “a lot of vaccines do use them,” and therefore people should “have to be very careful if this is something that you’re worried about.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 1: I feel like I've just unlocked a new level of awakening and normally I would be so scared to talk about vaccines because someone's going to label me anti-vax, but I literally don't care anymore because the truth is out there and it's right in front of our faces. You can look on the inserts and it's literally aborted fetuses in the vaccine ingredient list and all these other animal cells and watch this two hour lecture and and he broke it down so factual and by timeline and connected the dots of everything and I looked everything up myself and it's all true. I'm gonna be posting stuff soon about this but long story short Roe v Wade was not meant for women's rights it was not made to protect women and their bodies to give them the opportunity to have an abortion if they need it that's not the point of roe v wade the propaganda is real it all makes sense and it's so disgusting that they're using aborted fetuses to make our vaccines anyone who thinks otherwise like i don't care anymore yes i'm anti-vaccine Speaker 0: unfortunately what this nurse is saying is true there are vaccines currently used in the u.s produced using human cells line originally derived from abortions this started in the 1960s the viruses are grown in these cells and purified trace dna may remain in very small minute amounts so this is why there is very good cause for religious exemptions for a lot of vaccines and Major religious bodies, including the Vatican, have addressed these moral concerns. And again, there is very good reason for religious exemptions because of this. Here are some examples of vaccines that still use these cell lines. You have the MMR vaccine, you have the chickenpox vaccine, hepatitis A, rabies. Some of the COVID-19 vaccines also use it, so... This is why religious exemptions were so important. But again, some Democrat states were trying to deny them. A lot of vaccines do not use them, but a lot of vaccines do use them. So you have to be very careful if this is something that you're worried about.
WallStreetApes
Posted - July 21, 2026 at 9:09 PM
Saved - July 22, 2026 at 1:55 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m raising a major concern about data centers using closed-loop cooling systems. Chemicals are reportedly added to the water and must be flushed every couple years, yet whistleblowers claim waste is being dumped into sewers/streams and that there’s no clear enforcement or cleanup requirements. Even “closed” systems eventually release contaminated water. I’m calling for investigations.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

There is a major concern about Data Centers that are using closed loop cooling systems that’s not being talked about There are a lot of chemicals being put into the water used in these systems. That water has to be flushed out every couple years Whistleblowers say that chemical water is being pushed into our streams and waterways and may have extremely limited cleaning requirements depending on state “I'm getting whistleblowers on the inside saying that they're taking all that waste and they're just running it down into the sewers. They're wanting to go to more closed cooling systems, and in those closed cooling systems, you still are gonna be using chemicals. There's no regulations about every 2 years when you have to clean out a cooling closed system, where are you gonna throw all of those chemicals?” “Taking polluted water and running it through system and dumping it into a river and it flows downstream, that will have a natural dilution, would resolve the issue, and it's not. Even if it's a closed cooling system, that water that's recycling in there, eventually they have to clean those systems. They have to release that water. And are there any regulations to look at what chemicals aren't in that water before we release it into the environment and just create another pollution issue?” “Right now it's a free-for-all out there.” It’s not a complete free for all, it depends on the states and general federal regulations. Discharges from cleaning, blowdown or maintenance are subject to environmental rules There should be compliance reporting but whistleblowers are saying none of this is being followed, they’re saying it’s a “free for all” and the data centers are just planning on the chemicals being diluted as they flow down our waterways We need investigations

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says whistleblowers claim waste from industrial processes is being run into sewers and that efforts are moving toward more closed cooling systems. Speaker 1 states closed cooling systems still use chemicals and says there are no regulations requiring cleaning out closed cooling systems every two years, including where those chemicals are disposed. Speaker 1 references a statement from her father, a mechanical engineer: “the solution to pollution is not dilution,” and argues that taking polluted water and dumping it downstream relies on natural dilution rather than solving the underlying issue. She asks whether there are regulations to determine which chemicals remain in the water before release into the environment and says, “Right now it’s a free-for-all out there.” Speaker 0 explains that closed loop water systems involve not only water but also a whole array of chemicals to stop corrosion, microbes, and growths. Speaker 0 says the systems must be flushed every so often and that when people cite very large volumes of water use, it is not “one time” because flushing happens repeatedly. Speaker 0 states that for HVAC systems and data centers, flushing can occur every one to three years, though data center timelines may differ. Speaker 0 says the whistleblowers’ claim is that the practice amounts to flushing chemicals downstream with insufficient oversight. Speaker 0 acknowledges that there are regulations under environmental rules, but says the whistleblowers argue it is still effectively a “free for all,” varying by state, and that reliance is placed on dilution. Speaker 1 then shifts to the scale of the issue by discussing mapping of data centers in America. She says the mapping project began about 10 weeks ago and reports “12,000 submissions,” with 8,000 submissions pinned on a map, and possibly 9,000 pinned. She says the team reads each submission and vets its location; some submissions lack zip codes, and some sites are solar farms where a data center is not yet present. She adds that so many data centers are being planned nationwide that “you can’t even see most of America” on the map. Speaker 2 asks how long ago the project started, and Speaker 1 confirms it was 10 weeks ago. Speaker 0 summarizes that the woman is mapping data centers across America and that, in just a few weeks, the project is up to nearly 10,000 pinned submissions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 1: I'm getting whistleblowers on the inside saying that they're taking all that waste and they're just running it down into the sewers. They're wanting to go to more closed cooling systems, and in those closed cooling systems, you still are gonna be using chemicals. There's no regulations about every two years when you have to clean out a cooling closed system, where you're gonna throw all of those chemicals. My dad's a mechanical engineer, and he used to always tell me, remember this, Erin, the solution to pollution is not dilution. And I often wonder if that's what they think. Taking polluted water and running it through a system and dumping it into a river and it flows downstream that will have a natural dilution would resolve the issue, and it's not. Even if with the closed cooling system, that water that's recycling in there, eventually they have to clean those systems, they have to release that water. And are there any regulations to look at what chemicals aren't in that water before we release it into the environment and just create another pollution issue? Right now it's a free-for-all out there. Speaker 0: This is something I don't think a lot of people realize is these closed loop water systems. They're not just putting water in these systems. They're putting a whole array of chemicals in this water to stop things like corrosion and microbes and growths and things like that. So it is not just water. And every so often that water does need to be flushed. So when they say, Oh, we're using X amount of tens of millions or hundreds of millions of gallons of water, they're not using it one time that water has to be flushed. And sometimes it can be every one to three years for HVAC systems, data centers are going to be a little bit different, but again, it is every few years that they're going to have to do this. So the thing that they're saying is that all that water is just going to be flushed into our streams and waterways, and there's not going to be any regulations. Well, there is regulations. They are subject to environmental rules, but what the whistleblowers are saying is that it's a free for all. So, Just know that there are some regulations that varies by state, but the whistleblowers are saying that nobody really cares. It's all just being flushed downstream and they're relying on water dilution. So how big is this issue? It is very big. The amount of data centers in America is crazy. Just listen to this. I saved this as from the same interview. I've saved this earlier and that's a good thing I did because you guys need to know. Speaker 2: How long ago did you start this? Speaker 1: 10 weeks ago. Speaker 2: Just 10 weeks ago? Speaker 1: 10 weeks ago. Speaker 2: And you, I mean, I... I want to give you an introduction before we go through. Sorry, I just jumped right into it. Did I read like you had like 7,000 something submissions? Speaker 1: 12,000 submissions. I updated the map last night and we've now pinned 8,000 submissions. So we read each submission and we vet its location. And some people won't have their zip codes in there. We can't find it. Or it's a solar farm. with a data center coming, but it's not there yet. So we read each one. So we're a little behind because we're reading it and we're a small group and vetting them. But we're now over 8,000, if not possibly 9,000 pinned on the map. And you just like, you can't even see most of America. There's just so many data centers going in everywhere. Speaker 0: So this lady is mapping all the data centers in America. And just in a few weeks, they're up to nearly 10,000.
WallStreetApes
Posted - July 9, 2026 at 3:06 AM
Saved - July 10, 2026 at 12:31 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I find this extremely suspicious: a Flock camera is being installed outside an Academy Sports + Outdoors that sells firearms, pointed directly at the store’s entrance. I don’t think it’s just tracking license plates—it appears designed to record who’s going in and out, possibly monitoring firearm or hunting-related purchases.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is extremely suspicious A Flock Camera is being installed right outside an ‘Academy Sports + Outdoors’ These sell firearms, but pay very close attention to where the camera is pointed. Right at the door. This isn’t tracking license plates, it’s literally installed and pointed directly at the door of the sporting store to capture who’s going in and out Almost like it’s mass surveillance and could be tracking people purchasing firearms or into these hunting activities

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the placement of a Flock camera is “especially suspicious” because it is installed directly in front of an outdoor store that sells guns. The speaker claims this placement would allow the camera to capture and catalog people entering the store. They say that although they have been told the cameras are license plate readers, the screenshot they took and zoomed in on shows the camera positioned on the opposite side of a pole, facing toward the building’s door. From this, the speaker concludes that the camera is not reading license plates but is instead documenting who is going in and out of the store.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay, this flock camera placement is especially suspicious because just take a look at this now. This is an outdoor store that sells guns. So it's very convenient to be putting one of these surveillance cameras out in front of a place that sells guns almost like they can capture whoever is walking through the door catalog them and surveillance what's going on. So again, we're being told that these cameras are license plate readers, but why is it being put here? Because I screenshot this and then I zoomed in and take a look. The camera is on the other side of the pole, which means it's facing right at the door of the building. So you take a look at this. They're not reading license plates. They're documenting who's going in and out of the store. This is highly suspicious.
WallStreetApes
Posted - July 8, 2026 at 3:15 PM
Saved - July 8, 2026 at 9:31 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I wish this wasn’t true, but it’s real. Lab-grown milk is being developed to replace cow’s milk, with Coca-Cola and Danone backing Wilk (formerly BioMilk). Claims say cells are taken from cows, immortalized using SV40, then prompted with lactation hormones, producing milk powder. It isn’t FDA approved, but some products are on shelves via GRAS, and only Mississippi has banned it.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

I wish this wasn’t true, but it’s real More on this Lab-grown milk is quietly being developed to replace cow's milk Coca-Cola and Danone, the world's largest baby formula, are backing a biotech that clones milk in a steel vat called Wilk (formerly BioMilk) “The grim process has customers outraged. This white slop is just 6 months away, and only one state has banned it” - That milk starts as a needle jammed into a cow, scraping out a single cell. - That cell is then immortalized with SV40, a cancer-linked monkey virus grown in fetal bovine serum - Those remains are pumped with a lactation hormone - It is then pulverized into a powder that looks and tastes like milk “Lab milk still isn't FDA approved, but lab dairy is already on shelves” The only US State to ban lab grown milk is Mississippi As far as the dairy products already on the shelves, this is also true and they’re being approved by the GRAS, generally recognized as safe loophole ‘Precision-fermented dairy proteins are on shelves via GRAS self-affirmation. Full cell-cultured milk like UnReal is targeting pilots in late 2026’ So yes, there are plans to hit the shelves this year in 2026 As far as the lab grown milk being a powder as the finished product, that’s true too. Lactation hormone and powder, the Cells are signaled with prolactin to produce milk. Final product can be liquid or dried

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript claims that lab-grown milk is quietly replacing cow’s milk, and that companies including Coca-Cola and Danone (described as the world’s largest baby formula company) are backing a biotech that clones milk. It says the process has “customers outraged.” The transcript describes the claimed production method as follows: milk is said to start with a “needle jammed into a cow,” scraping out a single cell. That cell is said to be immortalized with SV40, described as “a cancer-linked monkey virus,” grown in fetal bovine serum described as “the literal blood of unborn calves.” The transcript then claims the remains are pumped with a lactation hormone, and pulverized into a powder that “looks and tastes like milk.” It also states that only one state has banned the product, and that the process is described as being “six months away.” The transcript further states that a startup has showcased what it calls the first lab-grown whole cow milk, and links it to climate change claims, stating 82% less carbon, 90% less water, and 95% less land use. It says the product is not being “bought” by customers and that it is “all for profit” for companies mentioned in the transcript. A startup named Wilk is described as a rebranding of a company called bio milk, with the same company behind cell-cultured dairy. The transcript says the companies received multiple investments in the millions of dollars and are working to bring the product to market. It claims the milk is “cell cultured” and “harvested directly from the cows.” It states that SV40 is used in research to immortalize cells, and that the cells require “cell signaling,” described as using prolactin to produce milk. The final product is described as either liquid or dried powder; the transcript claims that dried production involves “pound it and then mix it” to become the milk product. The transcript says cell-cultured dairy products are being approved by GRAS under a “generally recognized as safe” FDA “loophole,” allowing companies to approve themselves if they say it is generally recognized as safe. It concludes by stating that full cell-cultured milk is targeted for release in late 2026, and claims there is “not a lot of time to stop something like this.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 1: Lab-grown milk is quietly replacing cow's milk. Coca-Cola and Danone, the world's largest baby formula, are backing a biotech that clones milk in a steal-that. The grim process has customers outraged. Speaker 2: This white slop is just six months away, and only one state has banned it. That milk starts as a needle jammed into a cow, scraping out a single cell. That cell is then immortalized with SV40, a cancer-linked monkey virus grown in fetal bovine serum. the literal blood of unborn calves. And that's nothing. Those remains are pumped with a lactation hormone, then pulverized into a powder that looks and tastes like milk. Speaker 0: I'm sorry to report that this one is actually true, and a startup has already showcased what they call the first lab-grown whole cow milk, which is not good. Apparently this is for climate change. 82% less carbon, 90% less water, and 95% less land use. So they're saying this is a benefit to the climate to get us all drinking this fake lab grown cell cultured milk, which nobody is buying. It's all for profit for these companies. And here we have this startup company called Wilk, and it's actually just a rebranding of a company called bio milk, but it's the same company. Um, it works on cell cultured dairy. They got multiple investments in the millions of dollars and they are making strides very quickly. to bring their product to market. So yes, the milk is cell cultured. It is harvested directly from the cows. And then the SV 40 is used in research to immortalize cells. That is what was mentioned in the video. So this exact thing is being used for this lab grown milk. And these companies do have to activate the cells and that's called cell signaling. So the cells are signaled with prolactin to produce milk. The final product can be either a liquid or dried and what's dried was what was mentioned in the video where they have to pound it and then mix it and it becomes that final milk product. So one of the things that is kind of concerning is that right now they are approving these cell culture dairy products by GRAS, which is a generally recognized as safe FDA loophole where the FDA doesn't even have to look at these things. These companies can approve it themselves if they just say that it's generally recognized as safe and it's just the honor system. And unfortunately for us, full cell cultured milk is targeted for release in late 2026. So there is not a lot of time to stop something like this.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 27, 2026 at 6:13 PM
Saved - June 28, 2026 at 10:52 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
My jaw dropped reading this. A husband at a huge mobile gaming company said they estimate a user’s home value from WiFi signal strength—using how far you’ve moved from the router to infer square footage, compare with location data, then target coin packs based on what you can “afford.” They also track direct-deposit days and push targeted ads.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

My jaw dropped listening to this “My husband worked for a very large mobile gaming company, and these are the craziest things he ever told me” He says they estimate the value of each users home by their home WiFi signal. “Let's talk about data tracking — They would estimate the value of your home, and the way they did that was by looking at your WiFi signal, and depending on how strong the signal was, they would know how far you've walked from where the router is in your house, and they could estimate the square footage of your house from that, compare that to your general location data, and guess how much your house is worth and then they would sell you coin packs based on how much money they thought you had” “They tracked the days of the month that you got your direct deposit, your paycheck, and they would send push notifications locations and targeted ads on those days to get you to buy coins” I verified all this is not only possibly, but it’s 100% happening - Mobile apps with permission can access WiFi signal strength - As you move around with your phone, the app logs how signal strength changes weaker farther from router. This can roughly estimate room sizes, floor plans and overall home footprint especially combined with GPS and location data for the neighborhood This is not what you sign up for when you download an app

Video Transcript AI Summary
A large mobile gaming company made fake slot-machine games on phones where users cannot win real money, but can spend money; free players received only a few coins per day. The top monthly spender averaged about $125,000 per month. The company tracked roughly 25 “high roller” users in this category, and those users generated about $2 million per month on average. High rollers were treated as VIPs, including a dedicated 24-hour phone line for customer service, invitations to all expenses-paid trips and events, and replacement iPads if a user’s device became outdated for the app. The company’s data tracking included monitoring direct deposit dates and paychecks, then sending push notifications and targeted ads on those specific days to prompt coin purchases. It also estimated home value using Wi‑Fi signal strength: by analyzing the signal strength, it could infer how far a person walked from the router within a house, estimate square footage, and combine that with general location data to guess how much the home was worth. Coin packs were then priced and offered based on how much money the company estimated the user had. The transcript also describes non-random outcomes tied to coin purchases. Immediately after buying coins, users would win more, receiving bonuses and jackpots; over time, the winnings would be tapered down and then sharply drop, causing users to lose their coins and prompting additional purchases. The company reportedly called this “addiction tracking.” Additionally, the transcript describes how mobile apps use Wi‑Fi signal strength recorded on a phone to infer home layout and room sizes, then cross-reference estimated home size with publicly available real estate data and ZIP code averages to estimate home worth. It also states that apps do not directly access bank account deposits, but can use GPS and location history to detect time spent near ATMs or banks; by checking those locations during typical pay periods, the apps could confirm paycheck timing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 1: My husband worked for a very large mobile gaming company, and these are the craziest things he ever told me. Speaker 0: For context, this company had a bunch of games, but the games he worked on specifically were slot machines. Not real slot machines. Fake ones on your phone where you cannot win any money. You can spend money. You only get a few coins per day for free. After that, you have to buy them. The top monthly spender on the app spent on average $125,000 per month. There were about 25 players that they considered high rollers up in this category, and from those 25, they made about 2 million per month on average. These players were treated like total VIPs. They had a dedicated phone line they could call 24 hours for customer service. They would be invited to all expenses paid trips and events. If their device was like out of date for the app and they couldn't play anymore, the company would just send them a new iPad. Now talk about data tracking. They track the days of the month that you got your direct deposit, your paycheck. And they would send push notifications and targeted ads on those days to get you to buy coins. They would estimate the value of your home. And the way they did that was by looking at your Wi-Fi signal. And depending on how strong the signal was, they would know how far you walked from where the router is in your house. And they could estimate the square footage of your house from that. Compare that to your general location data and guess how much your house is worth. And then they would sell you coin packs based on how much money they thought you had. And this will come as a surprise to no one. The wins and losses are not random. Right after you buy coins, you would win more. You would get bonuses, jackpots, you'd be winning. And then they would slowly taper it down and then they would plummet it to take all your coins back. So you'd have to buy more. And they called this addiction tracking. Speaker 1: this is wild that this is true so basically what happens is mobile apps get access to your wi-fi signal strength and then as you move around your as you move around your home with your phone your phone logs that signal strength and your apps have access to this information so then the apps get an idea of your floor plan your home footprint about how big your room sizes are And then they cross-reference that with publicly available real estate data and zip code averages. And then they can estimate how big your home is and what your home is worth. And then get a load of this. Apps don't directly have access to your bank account deposits, but they do have access to things like your GPS. So what they'll do is they'll monitor you where you go and they'll see if you're spending time near ATMs or banks. And if it's around the time that people typically get paid, then they can confirm that you're getting your paycheck on those dates. This is such an invasion of privacy and not what you sign up for when you download the app.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 28, 2026 at 10:19 PM
Saved - June 28, 2026 at 10:51 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m told the Rio Grande in Arizona is completely dry in many places. They don’t want you to know most of this water has been sold off in the past five years: about 87% goes to agriculture. Mexico gets a huge share under the US-Mexico water treaty, and from 2020–2025 it delivered only about 50% of what it owed.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The Rio Grande River in Arizona is completely dry in many locations They don’t want you to know, the majority of this water has been sold off over the past 5 years - A huge amount goes to agriculture, about 87% - Mexico gets an enormous amount of the water because of the US-Mexico Water Treaty Mexico is supposed to send about 1/3 of the water from certain rivers that flow into the Rio Grande to the US, mainly for Texas farmers - Minimum: Average of 350,000 acre-feet per year or 1.75 million over 5 years. - Mexico keeps the other 2/3 of that water for its own farms and cities - The US sends Mexico a lot of water from the Colorado River about 1.5 million acre feet per year During 2020-2025 Mexico only delivered about 50% of the water it owed to the United States at the end of the 5 year period Mexico continues to keep way more than their agreed share

Video Transcript AI Summary
A long-time fisher on the Rio Grande River said the river has dried up to nearly zero flow for much of the past four years, with only a few exceptions he has noticed. He reported pulling up nearly 100 pounds of dead fish from a small area, with the dryness stretching about five to ten miles. He described finding sizable dead channel catfish that had gone to waste in the dried river and said he has never experienced conditions like this firsthand, calling it a sad sight for someone used to finding quality fish in those spots. Another speaker said there is something people are not being told about the Colorado River being as dry as it is, focusing on water being sold and the use of withdrawals. They stated that about 87% or higher of water withdrawals are used for agriculture. They argued that the issue is over-leasing, claiming the Rio Grande is seeing peak agricultural leasing activity, meaning it is being leased more water than the river can actually support. They also pointed to a shared water arrangement with Mexico under a 1944 U.S.–Mexico treaty, saying the U.S. and Mexico each receive a percentage of the water. The speaker claimed Mexico is not delivering the amounts it is supposed to; they said Mexico delivered about 50% of what it owed the U.S. by the end of the last five-year period (between 2020 and 2025). They said this means Mexico is not holding up its end of the bargain, resulting in depleted water for the U.S. The final speaker reacted by saying, “This is so fucking sad.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 2: Guys, I have been fishing the Rio Grande River for many years now, and I have never seen anything like this. In the last four years, the river has dried up pretty much to zero flow. Maybe four times in the last four years that I know of, but this is the first time I've ever got to experience it firsthand. I have pulled up nearly 100 pounds of dead fish just in one little spot, and this dryness Stretches for about five to ten miles man. So this is just a fraction of the unalived fish out here Some of these catfish are pretty big too Not like the biggest I've ever seen or anything nor caught but gosh good sized channel catfish Gone to waste in the dried up Rio Grande. Oh, it's I'm not saying it's gonna be the end of all fishing on the Rio Grande River, but I It is just a sad sight when you're used to poking around in these spots, you know, to see quality fish that didn't make it. Speaker 1: There's something you're not being told about the Colorado River being as dry as it is, and the main thing is that the water is being sold. About 87% or higher of water withdrawals are being used for agriculture. Now you can argue that we need that water for agriculture, what the problem is is that they're over leasing it rio grande is seeing peak agricultural leasing activity which means they're leasing more of the water than the river can actually support another issue is that we split the water with mexico and this is due to a treaty it was the 1944 u.s mexico treaty this treaty basically means that we get a percentage of the water and mexico gets a percentage of the water but what you're also not being told is that mexico is not holding up their end of the bargain if you look at how much they are supposed to deliver They're not even delivering anything close to that amount of water. Part of this deal, they are supposed to give us water too. Mexico only delivered about 50% of what it owed the US by the end of the last five year period, meaning between 2020 and 2025. So Mexico is not holding up their end of the bargain, which means that our water is depleted. Speaker 0: This is so fucking sad.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 21, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Saved - June 23, 2026 at 7:28 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
One user claims a Federal Reserve report shows 30% of metro home price increases and 20% of rent increases from early 2021 to early 2024 are due to illegal immigration, arguing it happened during the Biden administration and will worsen if Democrats gain power. Another user asks for the specific Federal Reserve report and exact locations in it to verify the figures.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 Real report released from the Federal Reserve finds 30% of the cost of increase in home prices and 20% of rent increases ARE DUE TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION No longer a conspiracy theory. “We just saw a study from the Federal Reserve just last week finding that 30% of the increase in home values across the country in metropolitan areas are due to illegal immigration” Just think about that, you already can’t afford a home and now they’re 30% more expensive because illegals flooded America under Biden You already can’t afford rent but you’re paying 20% more because illegals flooded America under Biden Again, these are increases for the average metro areas from early 2021 to early 2024. Under Biden’s Presidency The second Democrats gain power this starts back up and rent and homes get even more expensive

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers argue that Tallarico’s importance is not just that he is “weird,” “crazy,” or has “outlandish beliefs,” but that his policies would make life “tangibly worse” for people in Texas. One claim is that a Federal Reserve study found that illegal immigration drove housing and rental costs upward: “30% of the increase in home values across the country in metropolitan areas” is attributed to illegal immigration. The discussion also states that illegal immigrant worker flows accounted for “30% of the increase in house prices” and “20% of rent prices,” citing a Federal Reserve report/working paper and noting that “Google is reporting the same thing.” The speakers conclude from this that paying “20% more for rent” is because of illegal immigration, and reference the topic as being “all over Reddit.” The speakers further say Tallarico would “put a welcome mat on our southern border” and “blow our borders open.” They also claim Tallarico wants to “kill our energy industry,” which they describe as providing jobs in Texas and as “the backbone of our entire economy.” Speaker 0 adds additional figures from a “house government report” about consequences of illegal immigration: it claims “about 69% of illegals have no education beyond high school,” that “each illegal is costing us about $70,000 in benefits,” and that “around 60% of illegals are on some kind of government assisted welfare program.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 1: I think that the key with Tallarico is to remember that it's not just that he's weird and he's crazy and he has all kinds of outlandish beliefs, it's that his policies will make life tangibly worse for the people of Texas. We just saw a study from the Federal Reserve just last week finding that 30% of the increase in home values across the country in metropolitan areas are due to illegal immigration. Tallarico wants to put a welcome mat on our southern border. He wants to blow our borders open. This is somebody who wants to kill our energy industry, which not only provides jobs in Texas, but is the backbone of our entire economy. Speaker 0: Just so you can see, this is real. Here are multiple sources from the Fed. Illegal immigrant worker flows accounted for 30% of the increase in house prices, 20% of rent prices. Let's go down here again. Federal Reserve report. Unauthorized immigrant worker flows accounted for 30% of the housing growth, which is just crazy. We'll go to Google. Google is reporting the same thing. Federal reserve working paper found that illegal immigration accounted for 30% of house price growth, 20% of rent increases. So just think about this. If you're paying 20% more for rent, it's because of illegals. It's all over Reddit. And if we look over here, there's a house government report. about the consequences of illegal immigration. It shows about 69% of illegals have no education beyond high school. Each illegal is costing us about $70,000 in benefits. Around 60% of illegals are on some kind of government assisted welfare program.

@scottcjordan - Scott Jordan

@WallStreetApes @grok Can you please identify the "report from the Federal Reserve" that says this, and cite the place(s) in it that say this? It could be useful!

WallStreetApes
Posted - June 14, 2026 at 3:54 PM
Saved - June 15, 2026 at 12:47 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I saw Ford CEO Jim Farley argue people shouldn’t work on their own cars for repairs, saying it’s too complicated and you could “get hurt.” He noted Ford earns over $50B a year from service and repair, implying vehicles are designed to require special equipment.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Ford CEO Jim Farley says people should not be able to work on their own cars and make person repairs He says it’s just too complicated and you could “get hurt” Ford makes over $50 billion dollars per year from their service and repair departments. Thats the real reason they design vehicles so complicated you can’t repair them on your own and need special equipment

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says people repairing their own vehicles is fine in general, but not for warranty work because the cars are “very complicated” and the company does not think it is safe. They argue many repairs cannot be done at home; the speaker says they can work on a 1973 Bronco, but working on a brand new Bronco requires “all sorts of specialty tools,” and not having them could risk people’s lives. Speaker 0 then cites “what real Americans have to say,” stating that if they cannot work on their own vehicle, they expect a “bumper to bumper warranty” for at least 200,000 miles. They connect this to auto manufacturers designing vehicles so they can’t be worked on, claiming that manufacturers do this “that’s how they make their money.” The transcript then discusses data for Ford: about $101 billion in revenue comes from “Ford Blue,” described as parts and service; “Ford Pro” is described as another parts-and-service category with about $66.3 billion in revenue. Speaker 0 concludes that overall Ford makes about $50 billion every year from parts and repairs and says they have “found the real reason why they don’t want you repairing a vehicle.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't want people repairing their own vehicles? Speaker 1: No, that's fine. Not for warranty work, though. These are very complicated cars, and we don't think that's safe. For many of the repairs on our vehicles, someone at home like myself could never do it. I have no problem working on a 73 Bronco. To work on a brand new Bronco, I need all sorts of specialty tools. That's something that we would put people's lives at risk. Speaker 0: Here's what real Americans have to say about this. If I can't work on my own vehicle, I expect a bumper to bumper warranty for at least 200,000 miles. Obviously we all kind of agree with this one, but you need special tools because you design them like that. Exactly. Auto manufacturers design vehicles that you can't work on. That's how they make their money. Now let's look at the data. Now it looks like about $101 billion in revenue comes from Ford blue, which is parts and service. Ford Pro, which is another parts and service thing, they have about $66.3 billion in revenue. So overall, they make about $50 billion every single year from parts and repairs. I think we found the real reason why they don't want you repairing a vehicle.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 14, 2026 at 9:24 PM
Saved - June 14, 2026 at 11:39 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I can’t understand why the U.S. federal government lets foreign corporations—like Spain, the UK, and Canada—buy and own major stakes in American utility companies across many states. This feels like we’re being sold out.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Foreign countries have been allowed to buy American utility companies “Why in the world is the United States federal government allowing foreign corporations to own American utility companies” The issue is widespread. Spain, the UK, Canada and more own major stakes in American utility companies in many different states We are being sold out

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 2 questions why the United States federal government is allowing foreign corporations to own American utility companies. Speaker 1 responds that they like seeing a free flow of capital among allies and friends. Speaker 2 argues that the discussion resembles arguments about the benefits of globalization made for 30 years, which they say prioritize elite economists, out-of-touch politicians, and big corporations. They contend that upstate New Yorkers should not be forced to pay money to utility companies each month with that money shipped overseas to foreign corporations. Speaker 2 describes seniors on fixed incomes who are cutting medicine in half due to the utility costs. They also cite public school teachers who take second jobs because of the NYSEG bill, and a union woman whose husband, after retiring, must get another job to pay the NYSEG bill rather than spending time with his grandchildren. Speaker 2 states that the money paid each month goes to a corporate boardroom in Spain and asks whether Speaker 2 will look into the issue and use authority to get foreign corporations to stop owning American utility companies. Speaker 2’s question receives the response: “I will look into that issue.” Speaker 0 adds that foreign countries are being allowed to buy American utility companies, including Spain, Canada, and the UK. Speaker 0 says this is happening across multiple states: Connecticut, Maine, Arizona, Minnesota, Illinois, Rhode Island, and Vermont, calling it widespread.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 2: Why in the world? Is the United States federal government allowing foreign corporations to own American utility companies? Speaker 1: We do like to see, you know, free flow of capital, at least among our allies and friends. Speaker 2: I don't know which... Well, that just sounds like the same old tired arguments we've had for 30 years about the benefits of globalization that I know the elite economists and the out-of-touch politicians and big corporations want to shove down our throats because it makes them more profitable. Upstate New Yorkers should not be forced to shell out money every month to the utility company and see it shipped to a foreign corporation overseas. These are seniors on fixed incomes who are literally cutting their medicine in half. Public school teachers I've talked to who are picking up second jobs because of the NYSEG bill. A woman in the union whose husband finally got to retirement and wanted nothing else but to spend his time with his grandkids. He worked his whole life to earn that time with his grandkids. And you know what he's doing right now? He had to go get another job to pay the NYSEG bill. And that money he's putting out every month is going to a corporate boardroom in Spain. Will you commit to look into this issue and using your authority to get foreign corporations to stop owning American utility companies? I will look into that issue. Speaker 0: This is a real issue. Foreign countries are being allowed to buy American utility companies. Countries like Spain, Canada, the UK. And this is happening throughout multiple states like Connecticut, Maine. Arizona, Minnesota, Illinois, Rhode Island, Vermont. This is widespread.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 14, 2026 at 4:51 AM
Saved - June 14, 2026 at 6:54 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’ve read Senator Ron Johnson’s PSI majority staff interim report on FDA data mining and Dr. Ana Szarfman’s March 2021 analysis, and it claims the Covid vaccine had 25 major side effects that were hidden. It alleges a “masking” in the standard system where Pfizer and Moderna signals cancelled, so they told the public it was 100% safe and effective while “obscured” signals remained.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The conspiracy theorists were right A new FDA data mining report shows they knew the Covid vaccine had 25 major side effects and they all conspired to hide it from the public Senator Ron Johnson’s Senate PSI Majority Staff Interim Report has been released on FDA data mining and the March 2021 analysis by Dr. Ana Szarfman There was a “masking” in the standard FDA system, where signals from Pfizer and Moderna reportedly cancelled each other out Meaning they lied and hid the side effects from the public and told you it was 100% safe and effective I have compared the whole list for you: Neurological & Dysautonomia • Bell’s palsy (Suppressed Signal) • Paraesthesia ear (Suppressed Signal) • Bradykinesia (Suppressed Signal) • Basal ganglia stroke (Suppressed Signal) • Cerebral artery occlusion (Suppressed Signal) • Thalamic infarction • Sinus rhythm abnormality • Agonal rhythm • Diaphragmatic spasm • Dementia (Pfizer) Cardiac • Sudden cardiac death (Suppressed Signal) • Acute left ventricular failure (Suppressed Signal) • Diastolic dysfunction (Suppressed Signal) • Ejection fraction abnormal (Suppressed Signal) • Hypertensive emergency (Suppressed Signal) • Blood pressure systolic changes (Suppressed Signal) • Aortic stenosis (Suppressed Signal) • Cardiac failure chronic • Acute myocardial infarction (Pfizer, Moderna) • Cardiac telemetry abnormal (Pfizer) (Suppressed Signal) Vascular & Pulmonary • Pulmonary infarction (Suppressed Signal) • Embolic stroke • Ischaemic stroke • Aortic aneurysm rupture • May-Thurner syndrome • Hypomagnesaemia (Suppressed Signal) Other • Cholecystitis acute (Suppressed Signal) • AST/ALT ratio abnormal • Mastoid disorder • Cardiac assistance device user • Brain natriuretic peptide increased • Asymptomatic COVID-19 (Pfizer) (Suppressed Signal) The FDA’s standard analytical method allegedly masked “obscured” statistical safety signals in the data Aka they lied

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Johnson is asked about a “COVID cover-up” and why legacy media such as CNN is not covering it. The interviewee claims that Peter Marks knew on March 1, 2021 that “their algorithms were hiding safety signals,” and that 26 days later it was discovered they had 25 serious adverse events, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, bells and pauses, and different types of strokes. The interviewee says the information was “buried” and “hid,” calling it a major scandal that major media is ignoring for almost six weeks. When asked whether people could sue the U.S. government over the COVID cover-up, the interviewee says legal ramifications are hard to say, noting the government’s ability to protect itself and people carrying out its mission. They frame their role as exposing the issue and mention “radical transparency” from Secretary Kennedy as enabling access to more documents and more people to interview. The interviewee calls it the biggest scandal of their lifetime, saying people were not warned and were mandated to take the shot or were coerced or convinced without the kind of information needed for informed consent. They claim that millions suffered adverse events and that at least tens of thousands died after the March 1 date. In response, a commentator asserts that “conspiracy theorists were right again,” reiterating that 25 serious adverse events with the COVID vaccine were hidden from the public. They describe “masking” as obscuring and then list categories of side effects, focusing on neurological and cardiac effects (including sudden death and cardiac failure) and pulmonary effects associated with stroke, along with other “obscure” items. They conclude that people should have been warned about these side effects before getting the vaccine, rather than being told it was 100% safe and effective.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 3: Senator Johnson, can we get you on the COVID cover-up? So why do you think legacy media such as CNN is not covering this? Speaker 2: Why aren't you covering this? I want to ask you about Iran. You really ought to cover the fact that Peter Marks knew on March 1st of 2021 that their algorithms were hiding safety signals. 26 days later, found out 25 serious adverse events like sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, bells, pauses, different types of strokes, and they buried it. They hid it. It's a major scandal. It's even as big a scandal that the major media is completely ignoring the story. It's been out now for almost six weeks. Speaker 1: Can I ask about Iran? I'm sure that was your question. You're trying to ambush me. Me ambush you? So I ask you about Iran. Speaker 3: Do you think we could see people suing the U.S. government over this COVID cover-up? Speaker 2: It's hard to say. I mean, the government really does a good job of protecting itself and people that carry out its mission. So, you know, the legal ramifications for what harm these government officials did by not informing the American public, not giving them the information they had the right and had deserved to hear. I'm not sure what that is. My job right now is to expose it. I appreciate Secretary Kennedy's commitment to radical transparency. That's why we know about this. We have a lot more documents, a lot more people to interview. So stay tuned. Again, biggest scandal of my lifetime because because people weren't warned, they were mandated to take the shot or they were coerced or they're convinced without the kind of information they should have had for informed consent. And millions, millions suffered adverse events. At least tens of thousands died after that March 1st date. Speaker 0: So the conspiracy theorists were right again, and these 25 serious adverse events with the COVID vaccine were hidden from the public. They call it masking, but what that is is obscuring, which means that it just didn't come up. So let's go over some of these. I'm not a doctor, so it's kind of hard to pronounce some of these things, but these are the neurological side effects. I'll give you guys a second to read through these. Here are some cardiac. Now we know some of these already, the sudden death. Cardiac failure. Then we have some pulmonary. It's causing stroke. And other, here's some more obscure things. But all these side effects you should have been warned about before getting the vaccine, not being told it was 100% safe and effective.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 7, 2026 at 5:51 AM
Saved - June 7, 2026 at 1:42 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m saying $115 million per hour is lost to fraud—about $1 trillion a year—per the Government Accountability Office. I cite Senator Josh Hawley’s claim the money funds luxury items, terrorism, child trafficking, and drugs. Outdated systems are exploited with stolen identities and synthetic IDs; the chance of getting caught is virtually zero, and it’s highly organized.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is the truth about who benefits from your tax dollars - $115 million dollars PER HOUR is lost to fraud - That’s $1 trillion year, all stolen with fraud This isn’t a conspiracy theory, this is from the Government Accountability Office Senator Josh Hawley says the money is going to luxury items, terrorism, child trafficking and drugs Here’s the thing, they are exploiting our outdated government systems, this is exactly what Elon Musk says needed to be fixed and replaced to stop the fraud “They take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes. They go into programs that they know elected and appointed officials won't touch, and they can steal at scale. They learned a really valuable lesson: government never runs out of money. The probability of getting caught is virtually zero.” Read that again, the probability of getting caught is ZERO Criminal networks use stolen identities, synthetic IDs and scale via outdated technology This is highly organized

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses the idea that money from taxes paid by an everyday electrician is used for luxury purchases and for funding terrorism and child trafficking. It states that “a trillion dollars a year” is spent on “this stuff,” and repeats figures of “a hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour.” It then asks how this money is obtained, raising possibilities such as “trends, national organizations, criminal networks.” The response says they “take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes.” It explains that they “go into programs that they know elected and appointed officials won’t touch,” allowing them to “steal at scale.” The transcript concludes with the lesson that “Government never runs out of money,” and that “the probability of getting caught is virtually zero.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
You're telling me that the electrician who goes to work every day and clocks in and works his butt off and tries to earn just enough to be able to, you know, make his rent, maybe have a kid or two, put food on the table, his tax money is being used to buy other people luxury items, cars, yachts, whatever else, and is going to fund terrorism and child trafficking? Yes, sir. A trillion dollars a year on This stuff, a hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour. A hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour. How did they get their hands on it? What, what are we talking about here? Trends, national organizations, criminal networks? How did they get their hands on this money? They, they take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes. They go into programs that they know elected and appointed officials won't touch, and they can steal at scale. They learned a really valuable lesson Government never runs out of money, and the probability of getting caught is virtually zero.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 7, 2026 at 5:51 AM
Saved - June 7, 2026 at 1:37 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m sharing the truth about who benefits from our tax dollars: $115 million per hour is lost to fraud—about $1 trillion a year. The Government Accountability Office says it’s not a conspiracy. Senator Josh Hawley points to luxury items, terrorism, child trafficking, and drugs. Outdated systems let criminals steal at scale; the chance of getting caught is virtually zero.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is the truth about who benefits from your tax dollars - $115 million dollars PER HOUR is lost to fraud - That’s $1 trillion year, all stolen with fraud This isn’t a conspiracy theory, this is from the Government Accountability Office Senator Josh Hawley says the money is going to luxury items, terrorism, child trafficking and drugs Here’s the thing, they are exploiting our outdated government systems, this is exactly what Elon Musk says needed to be fixed and replaced to stop the fraud “They take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes. They go into programs that they know elected and appointed officials won't touch, and they can steal at scale. They learned a really valuable lesson: government never runs out of money. The probability of getting caught is virtually zero.” Read that again, the probability of getting caught is ZERO Criminal networks use stolen identities, synthetic IDs and scale via outdated technology This is highly organized

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript claims that an electrician who works every day and pays rent, supports a family, and relies on tax dollars is being told that his tax money is used to buy others’ luxury items such as cars and yachts, and to fund “terrorism and child trafficking.” It states that “a trillion dollars a year” is spent on “this stuff,” describing it as “a hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour.” It then asks how the money is obtained, questioning whether it comes from “trends, national organizations, [or] criminal networks,” and pressing for an explanation of “how did they get their hands on it?” The answer given is that the actors “take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes,” and they enter programs that elected and appointed officials “won’t touch,” allowing them “to steal at scale.” The transcript adds that the lesson learned is that “Government never runs out of money,” and that “the probability of getting caught is virtually zero.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
You're telling me that the electrician who goes to work every day and clocks in and works his butt off and tries to earn just enough to be able to, you know, make his rent, maybe have a kid or two, put food on the table, his tax money is being used to buy other people luxury items, cars, yachts, whatever else, and is going to fund terrorism and child trafficking? Yes, sir. A trillion dollars a year on This stuff, a hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour. A hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour. How did they get their hands on it? What, what are we talking about here? Trends, national organizations, criminal networks? How did they get their hands on this money? They, they take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes. They go into programs that they know elected and appointed officials won't touch, and they can steal at scale. They learned a really valuable lesson Government never runs out of money, and the probability of getting caught is virtually zero.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 4, 2026 at 2:30 AM
Saved - June 5, 2026 at 1:48 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I researched the details: America has SignalTrace, a commercially available law-enforcement tool that goes beyond ALPR. It captures Bluetooth, Wi‑Fi, RFID and other publicly broadcast signals from phones, watches, headphones, cars, key fobs, even luggage emissions. It correlates them into a unique “electronic fingerprint” tied to you, enabling face- and plate-free tracking and stored search for later, across public places and cities.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

New mass surveillance system introduced in America “If you thought flock cameras are bad, law enforcement now has a system that identifies you based on the signals coming off of every single device you have” “It collects your Bluetooth, your Wi-Fi, your RFID signals from your phone, your smartwatch, your headphones, your car, your car's radio, absolutely everything. Then it builds what they call an electronic fingerprint, and their website gives an example of this. So picture 70 cars drive by one of these systems. Every car has an iPhone, but not every car has the same iPhone model, same smartwatch that's on you, same headphones, same everything else. So they build a profile based on you, not just your car's license plate anymore. So that combination is unique to you. They don't just need your license plate anymore. They don't even need a picture of your face. They just need the signals that your devices are already broadcasting. Can work in malls, subways, any public place, pretty much anywhere this can work. And then all of that information is gonna get stored on a server where it could be searched for later.” This isn't some random theory, it's real and I researched the details It’s called SignalTrace, its commercially available law enforcement tool. It extends beyond traditional Automatic License Plate Recognition by capturing publicly broadcast radio signals from everyday devices Signals Captured: Bluetooth from phones, watches, headphones, car systems, Wi-Fi, RFID like tags, key fobs, luggage and other local device emissions It creates a Electronic Fingerprint unique profile by correlating multiple device signals that travel together with a vehicle and person. This includes your specific iPhone model + smartwatch + car infotainment + headphones This is a massive mass surveillance tool tracking profiles without needing faces, plates, or warrants in many cases. Networks of these sensors could map movements across cities It builds persistent tracking profiles without needing faces, plates or warrants. Networks of these sensors could map movements across cities We have to stop this type of technology for being normalized. This is unlawful surveillance without a warrant

Video Transcript AI Summary
Marshall says law enforcement has a system that identifies people using signals emitted by the devices they carry. He refers to the system as SignalTrace, made by Leonardo, and claims it collects Bluetooth, WiFi, and RFID signals from a phone, smartwatch, headphones, a car, and the car’s radio—“absolutely everything.” The system then builds an “electronic fingerprint” from those collected signals. Marshall says the website for SignalTrace demonstrates the approach using “Seventy cars” driving by one of these systems. He claims each car has an iPhone but that not every car has the same iPhone model, the same smartwatch, headphones, and other device details. According to Marshall, SignalTrace uses these differences to build a profile based on an individual rather than relying only on a car’s license plate. He adds that the system does not require a license plate or a picture of a face, asserting it only needs the signals devices are already broadcasting. Marshall further states that the system can operate in malls, subways, and “any public place,” wherever such signal collection can occur. He concludes that the claims described are “real” and says he will provide a link to the product page in the comments.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
If you thought flock cameras are bad, law enforcement now has a system that identifies you based on the signals coming off of every single device you have, and it has a public product page out there right now. I'm Marshall, I talk about cybersecurity news and things that affect everyday people like you, so please follow me to stay informed. It's called SignalTrace, made by Leonardo. It collects your Bluetooth, your WiFi, your RFID signals from your phone, your smartwatch, your headphones, your car, your car's radio, absolutely everything. Then it builds what they call an electronic fingerprint, and their website gives Seventy cars drive by one of these systems. Every car has an iPhone, but not every car has the same iPhone model, same smartwatch that's on you, same headphones, same everything else. So they build a profile based on you, not just your car's license plate anymore. So that combination is unique to you. They don't just need your license plate anymore, they don't even need a picture of your face. They just need the signals that your devices are already broadcasting. It can work in malls, subways, any public place, pretty much anywhere this can work. And then all that It's real. There's a product page out there, and I'll put the link in the comments so you can go see it yourself.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 3, 2026 at 1:15 PM
Saved - June 4, 2026 at 5:58 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I feel a sense of cold rage after Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said he received an email from a senior Hampshire police officer claiming incidents are policed differently based on ethnicity. He argues the Starmer government is targeting white people and dismissing immigrants, compares it to Democrat policies in America, and warns it will get very ugly like in South Africa.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is literally insane Reform UK leader Nigel Farage “We had an email come through this morning from a senior Hampshire police officer who said, "We are told to police incidents differently according to the ethnicity of those involved” “I feel a sense of cold rage” The UK is so far gone that the liberal government under Keir Starmer is telling the police to target white people and dismiss immigrants White People are already a global minority and this is just going to get worse and worse People need to understand how serious this is, we saw this in America under Democrats too Democrats were literally instructing the Justice Department to go after white moms and Christians If we don’t stand up soon and take our countries back, it’s going to get very ugly. Just look at South Africa

Video Transcript AI Summary
An email from a senior Hampshire police officer claimed that police are told to handle incidents differently depending on the ethnicity of those involved. The speaker says the Novak family behaved with “very, very great dignity” and that they felt “desperately sorry” for them. The speaker also describes “a sense of cold rage” at how police treated a man who was stabbed, saying the police “didn’t believe him.” They state that the man’s last words were his rights being read out to him, and that this occurred due to a false accusation of racism. The speaker says police have been trained and told to take “that” more seriously than anything else, adding that a false accusation of racism counted higher “at that moment” than “somebody who was dying.” They conclude that this is “two tier Britain” and say they are opposed to DEI, opposed to positive discrimination, and believe that in a free and fair country everyone must be judged equally on their merits.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
We had an email come through this morning from a senior Hampshire police officer who said we are told to police incidents differently according to the ethnicity of those involved. I thought the way the Novak family behaved was with very, very great dignity. I felt desperately sorry for them. but yes, I, I feel a sense of cold rage at the way the police treated somebody who was stabbed. They didn't believe him. the last words on earth this man heard were his rights being read out to him, all because of a false accusation of racism. And the police have been trained and told, "You must take that more seriously than anything else." A false accusation of racism counted higher at that moment Than somebody who was dying. This is two tier Britain, and, and I'm totally opposed to it. I'm opposed to DEI, I'm opposed to positive discrimination. I believe if we're gonna live in a free and fair country, everybody must be judged equally on their merits
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 4, 2026 at 12:16 AM
Saved - June 4, 2026 at 4:13 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m seeing a British woman say white people in the UK can’t trust the police or even report crime because she believes they’re “so racist” toward anyone white or English. She says this isn’t just her view and points to alleged “inside information” from Nigel Farage claiming Hampshire police are told to police incidents by ethnicity.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

British woman says white people in the UK can no longer trust the police or even call the police She says the police are "so racist towards anyone white or English” “I feel that the police are now so racist towards anyone white or English or anyone who even looks like me. I would never dare speak to them to report crime. I would not email them or phone them. I do not trust them not to be racist towards me” This isn’t a conspiracy theory, or just one woman saying this. There is real evidence Reform UK leader Nigel Farage leaked inside information He said “We had an email come through this morning from a senior Hampshire police officer who said, "We are told to police incidents differently according to the ethnicity of those involved” And this was just within the last couple days. The police are instructed to intentionally target white native people while favoring minorities Everyone needs to understand how dangerous this is

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says they believe the police are racist toward white people and English people, and toward anyone who “looks like me.” They state they would never dare to speak to police to report crime, and that they would not email or phone the police. The speaker says they do not trust police “not to be racist” toward them. They also describe attending a residents meeting on Thursday but saying they were unable to come the previous Thursday because they went to a residents police meeting. At that police meeting, the speaker told the police directly that they would not report crime to them and would not speak to a police person alone because they did not trust them. The speaker claims the police are racist toward English and white people and says, “we won’t stand for it.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
In my opinion, I feel that the police are now so racist towards anyone white or English or anyone who even looks like me I would never dare speak to them to report crime. I wouldn't email them or phone them. I don't trust them, not to be racist towards me. And at a residents meeting on Thursday, I wasn't able to come here last Thursday because I went to a residents police meeting. I told the police straight, I won't report crime to you. I won't speak to a police person alone. I don't trust you. You are racist towards the English and white people, and we won't stand for it.
WallStreetApes
Posted - May 29, 2026 at 4:23 PM
Saved - May 30, 2026 at 1:30 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I work at an architecture firm that designs data centers, and we were told to “defend” their water use to friends and family, using a graph. It compares domestic usage to farms and golf, claiming data centers aren’t big users. But the figures mostly cover sinks and toilets, downplaying server cooling—so the argument feels misleading propaganda.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Data Centers are coaching their workers on how to lie to the public and their family about how Data Center water usage is actually a good thing “I work at an architecture firm that mainly does data centers, and just to give you all an idea of how out of touch the people making these things are. Today we had a meeting where we were essentially asked to defend the water usage of data centers to our friends and family in conversation at the dinner table or online. They provided them with a graph to break down water usage (included) but I’ll go over it The chart compares “domestic water usage” (toilets, sinks, etc.) for a typical-sized closed-loop data center of 600,000 gallons per year against other things of “equivalent square footage”: Cornfield: 5.85 million gallons Vineyard: 5.60 million Golf course: 5.45 million Peanut farm: 2.88 million Movie theater: 935,000 5 households: 730,000 They make the point that “Data centers aren’t the big water users you think” But that’s not really true “It's still using an incredible amount of water — and the key piece of evidence here was when someone gets pissed at a data center's water usage, ask them if they like golf. And when they say yes, let them know that a golf course uses 9 times as much water much water as a data center. That'll shut them up, because no one disapproves of golf courses using an exorbitant amount of water…” Not to mention, this is incredibly misleading The 600,000 gallons is mostly just building operations of things like sinks and bathrooms. It downplays or completely excludes the main water use, which is cooling the servers More fake propaganda

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 26, 2026 at 1:10 PM
Saved - May 26, 2026 at 1:39 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I saw over 150 residents pack Red Oak, Texas City Hall, protesting a rezoning that council approved late into the night: a massive 830-acre data center campus. Opponents warned about unknown health impacts, and that a single cluster could use as much power as 300,000 homes. The project is moving forward anyway.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Over 150 residents in Red Oak, Texas packed their City Hall meeting, spilling into hallways to protest Despite this their local officials stayed until after midnight and approved a new massive 830 acre data center campus in the middle of the night They don’t work for you The project is will be the 6th data center in the small city of Red Oak. The population is only about 15,000- 20,000 people The council approved the rezoning despite strong opposition. The project is moving forward Resident “We don't need another data center. You don't know what the health impact is. You got them all crunched together — You're going to ruin this community” I found that just these data centers in this small town will use as much power as 300,000 homes Insane

Video Transcript AI Summary
We don’t need another data center. The speaker says people don’t know the health impact, arguing that placing many facilities together “crunched” will lead to a “mass exit” and ruin the community. They emphasize that the community’s welfare should be prioritized and that decision-makers may believe they are doing what is correct, but are not pausing to pay attention to what local people are saying. The speaker concludes that they will fight for their people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We don't need another data center. You don't know what the health impact is. You got them all crunched together. You're gonna have a mass exit. You're gonna ruin this community. You're gonna ruin it. Ruin it if you let this continue. We're supposed to look out for the welfare of our people, and I feel like maybe they think they're doing what's correct, but they're not really pausing and paying attention to to what their people are saying. So I'm gonna fight for that, and I'm gonna fight for our people.
WallStreetApes
Posted - May 22, 2026 at 9:01 PM
Saved - May 23, 2026 at 3:45 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m sad to see Tulsi Gabbard resign to care for her husband. I also note it’s been 303 days since she referred Barack Obama to the DOJ for criminal prosecution. Despite this, the DOJ hasn’t brought a single indictment. The recommended charges include treasonous conspiracy, politicizing/manufacturing intelligence, and withholding/leaking classified information, with claims that Obama orchestrated the Russia collusion hoax with CIA help.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

It’s sad to see Tulsi Gabbard having to resign to care for her husband Let’s not forget, It has now been 303 days since National Security Director Tulsi Gabbard referred Barack Obama to the DOJ for criminal prosecution 303 days and the DOJ refuses to bring a single indictment The charges she recommended are for Treasonous Conspiracy, Manufacturing and Politicizing Intelligence and Withholding and Leaking Classified Information Tulsi Gabbard provided proof that Barack Obama orchestrated the Russia Collusion hoax and worked with the CIA to manufacture fake evidence

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 21, 2026 at 3:39 AM
Saved - May 21, 2026 at 5:17 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m seeing claims that once an Indian-born CEO is hired at major U.S. companies, Americans get pushed out and replaced by Indians. Examples listed include Google, Microsoft, Adobe, IBM, and others. The post says there’s a “correlation” with increased offshoring/outsourcing to India and that H-1B visa applications “skyrocket,” concluding: “This needs to stop.”

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

New data shows once an Indian CEO gets hired at a major company, what follows is Americans getting pushed out of their jobs and replaced by Indians Major Companies with an Indian CEO: - Google - Sundar Pichai - Indian - Microsoft - Satya Nadella - Indian - YouTube - Neal Mohan - Indian - Adobe - Shantanu Narayen - Indian - IBM - Arvind Krishna - Indian - Infosys - Salil Parekh Indian - NetApp - George Kurian - Indian - Arista Networks - Jayshree Ullal - Indian - Novartis - Vasant Narasimhan - Indian - Micron - Sanjay Mehrotra - Indian - Honeywell - Vimal Kapur - Indian - Flex - Revathi Advaithi - Indian - Niyafair (Wayfair) - Niraj Shah - Indian - Chanel - Leena Nair - Indian - Shantanu Narayen (Adobe) - Indian - Cognizant - Ravi Kumar S. - Indian - Cognizant (variant/duplicate) - Indian - Vertex - Reshma Kewalramani - Indian - Escaler Indian - Zscaler - Jay Chaudhry - Indian - Microsoft Gaming - Indian - FedEx - Indian “There's an observable correlation between the rise of Indian-born CEOs taking the helms at major U.S. companies and increased offshoring and outsourcing activity to India” There is also a massive correlation to once an India CEO gets hired, H-1B visa applications skyrocket This needs to stop

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion claims an “observable correlation” between Indian-born CEOs rising at major US companies and increased offshoring and outsourcing work to India. Examples given include Google: Sundar Pichai became CEO in 2015, when Google reportedly filed 2,896 H-1B visa applications, and by 2021 the number reportedly increased to 9,315. A participant describing work at FedEx says they noticed more Indians working internally and that the company outsourced work to India; they say that is what happened to their jobs and team after they were fired. They state that “They all went to India,” and describe being asked to train their replacement from India as “crushing,” adding, “if you go broke.” The conversation turns to job loss and difficulty finding work. One person says they had to sell a home in Sunnyvale that was custom made for them, and reports looking for a job for two years despite having experience and believing they “should have walked right into these corporate jobs.” They attribute their struggle to Silicon Valley being “flooded with people who work for two thirds of the price or even half price.” Another participant argues that the Indian community has helped America’s growth because Indians “come with a lot of academics” and have “always contributed very highly to the… American economy.” A further perspective describes dehumanizing and humiliating experiences, saying it felt like Google cared so little about the worker-investment that it would “just throw it… to any group” believed capable of doing the work. They also say forcing training for replacement workers “was sometimes kind of felt mean, you know, and harsh.” A different voice says they are an American and a US citizen but do not feel threatened about their job because they show up and perform their work, believe they have not replaced a US worker, and have adapted to the environment while continuing to work.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Indians have become CEOs at major American companies, including Microsoft, Google, Adobe, IBM, YouTube, FedEx, and T Mobile. How are they reshaping US tech firms? Speaker 1: There's an observable correlation between the rise of Indian born CEOs taking the helms at major US companies and increased offshoring and outsourcing activity to India. In the case of Google, Sundar Pichai became CEO in 2015. In that year, they filed a total of 2,896 h one b visa applications. However, fast forward six years to 2021, they had filed 9,315 h one b visa applications. Speaker 0: You noticed more Indians working at FedEx internally. So they were outsourcing work to India. Is that right? Offshoring jobs. And eventually, that's what happened to you? Correct. And what happened to your jobs and your team when you're all fired? Speaker 2: They all went to India. Speaker 0: How did it feel to be asked to train your replacement from India? Speaker 2: It was crushing if you go broke. Speaker 0: So no American company has ever been sanctioned for replacing American workers with foreign workers when they didn't have to do so. Speaker 1: Right. It's not as absolutely never has occur has never occurred. Speaker 2: I had to sell my wonderful, perfect gem of a home in Sunnyvale that was custom made for me. Speaker 0: How long have you been looking for a job? Speaker 2: Two years. I had experience. I should have walked right into these corporate jobs, but I didn't. Why? Because Silicon Valley is flooded with people who work for two thirds of the price or even half price. Speaker 3: I think the Indian community has really helped in the growth of America just because we come with a lot of academics, right? All Indians are very highly educated. And I think we've always contributed very highly to the Indian, you know, to the American economy. Speaker 4: It felt dehumanizing and it felt humiliating in a way to think that Google cared so little about your investment as a worker on their product that they would just throw it, you know, to any group that they thought might be able to do it. Speaker 3: I'm an American. I'm a US citizen, but I don't feel threatened about my job because I know that I work. I come to work on daily basis. I do my I perform my job. I don't think I have replaced any US worker here. I've come here. I've worked. I've gone through the whole system, and I've kind of adapted myself to the environment, and I'm still working, right? Speaker 4: And then to even force you to train your replacement people was sometimes kind of felt mean, you know, and harsh.
WallStreetApes
Posted - May 14, 2026 at 1:05 PM
Saved - May 14, 2026 at 11:36 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m a California IT professional with 20 years’ experience, and I’m not speculating: Flock’s patents describe AI surveillance that captures passing people and vehicles and sends data to a private corporate cloud for nationwide querying by state and federal agencies. Corona residents have no public-record rights against the servers. Public records also show Border Patrol access via a pilot. I believe they’re lying—start auditing queries and cancel contracts.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is horrifying and every American needs to hear this California resident exposes what’s really going on with Flock Cameras in America “I want to be clear what these cameras actually are, and I say that with somebody with 20 years of experience in IT. I've served as the chief network architect for Fortune 500 companies, I've designed data centers, and today I work on cloud infrastructure for one of the largest loan origination companies in the country. I'm not speculating on how this technology works. I've read their patents and I know how it works. Flock advertises these cameras as simple license plate readers. But their own patents tell a different story. They're AI-powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, making it queryable by a multitude of state and federal agencies. The city of Corona does not control that database, and Corona residents have no public record rights against a private company's servers. Our daily movements are being harvested by a $7.5 billion corporation, that only answers to venture capital investors, not to us. Flock did not reach that valuation on their per-camera subscription fees. That math doesn't add up The city council should also understand who they're doing business with. Flock CEO was asked whether the company had any federal contracts. He said no. That was a lie. Public records revealed that Flock had been secretly running a pilot program giving the US Border Patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Now consider who's behind the company and where your data flows. Flock integrates directly with Palantir, a data fusion platform, with a $30 million contract with ICE. Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, is also one of Flock's primary investors. These are not separate companies with separate agendas. They are connected actors that are building a connected infrastructure. Palantir's own CEO stated publicly just this month that his technology is being used as a political instrument, designed to reduce the political power of certain voters. And that's the ecosystem that our Corona cameras are feeding into. We're not anti-police at all. We're against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company with a documented record of deception, built by investors with a stated political agenda. We're asking the City Council to start auditing the queries made against Flock's database, to disclose any data sharing agreements, and to take a vote to cancel the Flock safety contract” I looked more into this and he is 100% right Patents describe broader object detection, including tracking people and pedestrians, patents like US11416545B1. The system uses a centralized cloud database for nationwide queries Data goes to Flock’s private cloud, AWS-based, encrypted. Nationwide lookup is common, 75%+ of customers are enrolled enabling cross-jurisdictional searches. Residents have no direct public records access to the corporate servers. This creates a mass surveillance network feeding a private company’s infrastructure If you ask me this is laying the infrastructure for a mass surveillance network in America. We are being lied to. Cancel all contracts nationwide

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brett, a Corona resident in District 415 for 19 years, introduces DFLOC Corona, a community coalition asking the city council to cancel the city’s contract with Flock Safety and remove cameras deployed throughout the city. He says new Flock cameras were recently installed between his home and his daughter’s school, so his family is being photographed and logged every time they make that drive. Brett states that Flock cameras are not merely simple license plate readers. He says Flock’s patents show they are AI-powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, where it can be queried by multiple state and federal agencies. He says the city of Corona does not control the database and residents do not have public record rights against the private company’s servers. He claims residents’ daily movements are being harvested by a corporation he describes as valued at $7,500,000,000 and argues the company did not reach that valuation through per-camera subscription fees. He also asserts the city council should consider who it is doing business with, saying Flock’s CEO was asked about federal contracts, responded “no,” and that public records show Flock had secretly run a pilot program providing the US border patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Brett says Flock integrates directly with Palantir, describing Palantir as having a $30,000,000 contract with ICE. He also states that Peter Thiel, Palantir’s founder, is one of Flock’s primary investors, and argues these companies are connected actors building a connected infrastructure. He adds that Palantir’s CEO publicly stated that his technology is being used as a political instrument designed to reduce the political power of certain voters, which Brett says is the ecosystem his city’s cameras feed into. He says the coalition is not anti-police, but is against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company he describes as having a documented record of deception. Brett asks the city council to audit queries made against Flock’s database to disclose any data-sharing agreements and to vote to cancel the Flock Safety contract.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Brett, and I've been a Corona resident in District 415 years. I'm here to introduce DFLOC Corona, a community coalition asking this council to cancel the city's contract with flock safety and remove the cameras that have been deployed throughout our city. Our website is dflock-corona.org. I'm here because new Flock cameras were recently installed between my home and my daughter's school. So now every time I make that drive, my family is being photographed and logged into a giant corporate database. I wanna be clear what these cameras actually are, and I say that with somebody with twenty years of experience in IT. I've served as the chief network architect for Fortune 500 companies. I've designed data centers. And today, work on cloud infrastructure for one of the largest loan origination companies in the country. I'm not speculating on how this technology work. I've read their patents, and I know how it works. Flock advertises these cameras as simple license plate readers. Their own patents tell a different story. They're AI powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, making it queryable by a multitude of state and federal agencies. The city of Corona does not control that database, and Corona residents have no public record rights against a a private company servers. Our daily movements are being harvested by a $7,500,000,000 corporation that only answers to venture capital investors, not to us. Flock did not reach that valuation on their per camera subscription fees. That math doesn't add up. The city council should also understand who they're doing business with. Flock's CEO was asked whether the company had any federal contracts. He said no. That was a lie. Public records revealed that Flock had been secretly running a pilot program giving the US border patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Now consider who's behind the company and where your data flows. Flock integrates directly with Palantir, a data fusion platform with a $30,000,000 contract with ICE. Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, is also one of Flock's primary investors. These are not separate companies with separate agendas. They're connected actors that are building a connected infrastructure. Palantir's own CEO stated publicly just this month that his technology is being used as a political instrument to designed to reduce the political power of certain voters, and that's the ecosystem that our corona cameras are feeding into. We're not anti police at all. We're against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company with a documented record of deception built by investors with a stated political agenda. We're asking the city council to start auditing the queries made against FLOC's database to disclose any data sharing agreements and to take a vote to cancel the FLOC safety contract.
WallStreetApes
Posted - May 9, 2026 at 12:45 PM
Saved - May 10, 2026 at 6:27 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I heard Rep. Tim Burchett say a classified State Dept memo on his desk claims Biden-era Democrats sent over $5 billion to Afghanistan, routed through about 1,000 NGOs and the UN, with the Taliban in control and the money ending up with them. He says American taxpayers’ money funded the Taliban. Who needs enemies when you have Democrats.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOW 🚨 Rep Tim Burchett says he for a classified memo on his desk from the State Department on his desk about the Biden Administration It says that Democrats under the Biden Administration SENT OVER $5 BILLION TO AFGHANISTAN The money was sent to NGOs and he says the Taliban control the country so the money really went to them He says the money flowed through 1,000 different NGOs and the United Nations was involved Again, this is all our money that American taxpayers must pay back, found to the Taliban and Afghanistan Who needs enemies when you have Democrats

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 6, 2026 at 7:10 PM
Saved - May 7, 2026 at 7:10 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I see the Trump administration enforcing 8 U.S.C. § 1324d civil penalties for failing to depart after a final removal order. Undocumented people may be fined $998 per day, retroactive up to 5 years, potentially $1.8 million or more. One long-resident woman with three birthright citizenship babies faced a $1.8M fine. This is framed as enforcing the law; it’s a sign to leave.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The Trump Administration has begun sending massive fund to undocumented people in America illegally One woman who’s been here for over 20 years illegally and had 3 birthright citizenship babies just received a $1.8 million dollar fine Undocumented people are now being charged $998 per day for being in America illegally This ain’t a new law, Trump is just enforcing the law The $998 per day fine comes from a 1996 law (8 U.S.C. § 1324d) that allows civil penalties for failing to depart after a final removal and deportation order. The law was rarely used before but is now being aggressively enforced under the Trump administration Fines can be applied retroactively up to 5 years, leading to bills of $1.8 million or more If you’re in America illegally, this is your sign to leave

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 6, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Saved - May 6, 2026 at 8:38 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m noting a Florida data center where its generators kick off in the morning, blasting heavy black smoke. Remember when electricity and diesel caused climate change? Now data centers use as much power as cities, and it’s framed as no problem.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Here’s how this Data Center’s generators starts up in the morning in Florida Notice the constant stream of heavy black smoke Remember just a couple years ago when using electricity and diesel caused climate change, now data centers use as much power as cities and its no problem https://t.co/zeUlfzLBmY

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 4, 2026 at 6:20 PM
Saved - May 4, 2026 at 8:14 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I recount Mikki Willis’s view: Covid was planned to release in 2020 to thwart Trump, backed by Epstein files, but it wasn’t supposed to happen yet and perhaps was intended around 2026. States with looser central control, like the Dakotas, fared better because people had a choice. Censorship didn’t stop questions. He says Covid was crimes against humanity and no one has been held accountable.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Filmmaker and director of the Plandemic documentary series Mikki Willis says after all the research he’s done he believes Covid was forced to be released earlier than they wanted, and that was what saved us “What we've deduced from all of our research — was that this was planned and the Jeffrey Epstein files have proven that, but it wasn't supposed to happen yet. It wasn't supposed to happen in 2020. They pulled the trigger in 2020 because every effort to stop Trump, every Russia, Russia, every impeachment thing was failing. And so they pushed it forward. This was a plan, but probably maybe it was supposed to happen around now (2026) The saving grace for us all, was that all of their plan wasn't in place. So we have outliers now. We have states within our own country. They hadn't yet been able to install their own leadership, so they didn't play the game. We're able to look at the data and say, well, why is it that the Dakotas did so much better? They didn't clamp down their economies better. They gave their citizens a choice. Whether you wanna wear a mask or not, that's the problem. When they don't have the centralization totally intact because then you get these outliers that become the case study for us to look at and go, well, hold on a second. Why do we have less deaths there for, you know, a country that was 3% vaccinated” He explains how not having that total control in place yet, is what ultimately allowed us to question it. Despite censorship efforts. He goes into more details Covid was crimes against humanity and not one single person has been held accountable for their part in it It was literally basically black and white planned out in the Epstein files before it happened and still no accountability

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 2, 2026 at 8:34 PM
Saved - May 3, 2026 at 2:51 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that Amanda Askell, ethics chief at Anthropic, allegedly says discrimination against White people can be morally justified, including positive discrimination for Black students. Critics, citing Claude 2.0 tests, argue this reflects a worldview that justifies race-based preferences to “correct” past injustices, attributing them to White people.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is Amanda Askell, she is in charge of the ethics and morality of Anthropic artificial intelligence She wrote that discrimination is okay, as long as it’s against White People “We do not assume all forms of discrimination are bad. Positive discrimination in favor of black students may be considered morally justified” “In one breath, Anthropic will claim to care so deeply about mass surveillance, that they're willing to lose a massive government contract, and the next breath, Anthropic will sing the praises of positive discrimination. As long as it hurts white people As long as the AI is letting white people die, then all things considered you could, you know, maybe the outcome is morally justified. That's the implication here.” This isn’t a conspiracy, she really is saying discrimination against White People is okay. It’s in the critics findings The paper examined how Claude 2.0 handled scenarios and found patterns of both positive and negative discrimination. Critics argue this reflects a worldview that justifies race-based preferences against certain groups like White and Asian students as morally acceptable to “correct” historical injustices The “historical injustices” are seen as being committed by white people

WallStreetApes
Posted - April 30, 2026 at 1:36 AM
Saved - May 1, 2026 at 1:32 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that Santa Carota Beef finishes Black Angus cattle on upcycled carrots (up to 95% of their diet from Bolthouse Farms). They grass-feed on pasture, then finish with carrot-based feed. A large processor started mixing their high-quality beef with foreign low-quality beef, and, instead of settling, pressured them out of business, costing millions in lost customers due to quality.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

A cattle ranch called ‘Santa Carota Beef’ created a new method of raising beef They finish the cows by feeding them carrots, a sustainable alternative to conventional feed lots They’re going through 1 million pounds of carrots per day. A large beef processor caught wind of that and started mixing their low quality foreign beef with this California ranch’s high quality beef Instead of settling, the large meat processor is driving this ranch out of business This meat processor mixing this ranch’s beef with foreign beef cost them millions in lost customers due to quality They raise Black Angus cattle grass-fed on pasture, then finish them on a high percentage (up to 95%) of upcycled cull carrots from nearby major producers like Bolthouse Farms Tuis makes the meat Juicier and more tender Now this meat processor is driving them out of business

Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript covers the rise and disruption of a beef brand and the broader industry context. It begins with claims that Tanacarata beef went viral for finishing beef on carrots, presenting it as a sustainable alternative to conventional feedlot methods. The company reportedly published testing results claiming they go through a remarkable 1,000,000 pounds per day, with the assertion that none of that is metabolized into sugar because cows are ruminant animals. Customers supposedly loved the taste, and Santa Clarita marketed it as premium. However, these developments allegedly collapsed after the industrial food system learned of the approach. Speaker 1, Justin Pettit, identifies himself as the founder of Santa Croda Beef and provides an update on ongoing issues. He says that a few years prior, their company caught a large meat processor mixing foreign beef with theirs, resulting in millions of dollars in losses. He states that they have opened up a lawsuit about a year ago and have attempted mediation, but the opposing party has no intention of settling and aims to put Santa Croda Beef out of business. The discussion then situates these events within a broader pattern of consolidation in the food system, particularly in the beef industry, where “the big four” control nearly 85% of the market. The speaker advocates for breaking up corporate consolidation through a localized farmers market app that enables direct shopping from sustainable cattle ranchers, especially for listeners in the California area. The message emphasizes supporting smaller producers. In closing, the transcript urges listeners to show support for Santa Clara (Santa Clarita) and highlights that they are “doing things the right way” and “definitely need your support right now.” The overall narrative combines a story of a novel beef finishing method and its alleged backlash with a personal account of legal action against a large processor, framed within a call for local, direct-from-ranch commerce to counter market consolidation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is what happens when you fight back against the system and the system bites back. Tanacarata beef went viral for their new method of finishing beef on carrots, a sustainable alternative to conventional feedlot. They even published testing results showing they go through a remarkable 1,000,000 pounds per day, yet none of that is metabolized into sugar as cows are ruminant animals. Customers love the taste, Santa Clarita sells it as a premium because it is, but that all came crashing down when the industrial food system heard wind of it. Speaker 1: My name is Justin Pettit. I'm the founder of Santa Croda Beef. I just wanted to bring you guys up to speed on what's been happening with our company. Few years ago, we caught a large meat processor mixing foreign beef with ours and essentially burned us for millions of dollars. We've opened up a lawsuit about a year ago. We've tried mediation. They have no intentions of settling and only want to just put us out of business. Speaker 0: This is no surprise considering the food system is overrun by consolidation, especially prevalent in the beef industry where just the big four control nearly 85% of the market. Breaking up that corporate consolidation is we the localized farmers market app so you can shop directly from these sustainable cattle ranchers near you. Especially if you live in the California area, go show Santa Clara some love because they're doing things the right way and definitely need your support right now.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 28, 2026 at 2:36 PM
Saved - April 28, 2026 at 9:09 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I discuss a leaked call between Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and John Alle, a property manager and whistleblower in Pacific Palisades. Alle warned of extreme fire risk from high winds and dry brush. Bass replied cryptically—“read between the lines,” “hold tight,” “you will understand soon”—as if she knew danger was imminent but wouldn’t discuss it openly. Some interpret it as a planned fire or land grab. Very cryptic.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Leaked phone call from January 4, 2025 (3 days before the devastating Palisades Fire) The call is between Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and John Alle, a property manager and whistleblower in the Pacific Palisades, Westlake and MacArthur Park areas John Alle contacted Karen Bass to warn her about extreme fire risks due to weather conditions like high winds and dry brush Karen Bass tells him to “read between the lines,” “hold tight,” and that “you will understand soon.” She knew something was coming, almost like a planned fire (many believe the land grab) This call is interpreted as her knowing serious fire danger was imminent but not wanting to discuss what was about to happen openly…. Very cryptic

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says the situation is very dangerous and he would take criticism before a publicity stunt. He believes a press conference right now would be publicity and notes that neighbors, property owners, and residents are involved. He mentions 41,000 people live within a square mile and that two families share a one-bedroom apartment. They want to hear that something is going to be done and that it is recognized. If he must choose between that and compromising something, he will go along with it. He states it is not his area of expertise and emphasizes safety, adding that listeners should read between the lines. He asks them to hold tight and says they will understand soon; when he is able to talk, he will go into great detail. He says they’ve got him on the street and invites a call anytime, promising to call back. Regarding his trip, he is missing two work days. If President Biden extends an invitation, he took it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That this situation is very dangerous, and I would never do I will take the criticism before I do a publicity stunt. And, frankly, a press conference at this point in time, which is publicity. I think I don't But I think the the neighbors Mhmm. Property owners. Uh-huh. Yeah. And the residents. I mean, 41,000 people live within a square mile here. Yeah. Two families share a one bedroom apartment. But but they wanna hear that something is gonna be done. They wanna know it's recognized. But they wanna know it's recognized. Exactly. But if I have a choice between that and compromising something, I just have to go along with it. It's not my area of expertise. I wanna make sure that you are safe, and, hopefully, you can read in between the lines. But I would just appreciate just and it's hard for me to tell you this, but, hold tight. You will you will understand soon. Okay. Okay? Okay. And, when I am able to talk, I will be happy to go into great detail. Okay. And you've got me on the street, and you're welcome to call me at any time. I'll call you right back. No problem. And just in terms of my trip, just so you know, I'm missing two work days. That's it. And if president Biden extends me an invitation, I took it.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 26, 2026 at 6:30 PM
Saved - April 26, 2026 at 11:43 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Chaos as I see Canada’s government slip an omnibus budget bill that exempts themselves from FOIA. Records on cabinet ministers, parliamentary assistants, and their offices are now largely exempt from FOI requests. Holy shit.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Chaos and yelling as government in Canada makes themselves EXEMPT form Freedom of Information Act requests An omnibus budget bill secretly included a statute exempting themselves from FOIA requests Records on cabinet ministers, parliamentary assistants, and their offices inducing staff are now largely exempt from FOI requests Holy sh*t

Video Transcript AI Summary
The debate centers on changes to Ontario’s Freedom of Information (FOI) rules embedded in the budget bill. The motion passes, with the ayes 57 and nays 33, and is declared carried. Opposition MPs denounce the vote as the FOI changes being rushed and retroactive, arguing they will limit public and media access to government documents and effectively shield records involving Premier Ford and his cabinet from scrutiny. The changes were fast-tracked after a late-night legislative session, bypassing the normal committee review that would ordinarily allow public input before proposals are enacted. Speaker 0 frames the outcome by asserting that rights are not being taken away and that the public will still have substantial access; he promises continued transparency and accountability, including quarterly reports on spending. He says that information access remains broad, with tools available for the public to scrutinize government actions. Speaker 2 notes Premier Ford’s claim that 95% of information would remain accessible while 5% could be redacted to protect personal data, but points to disputes over whether some information would still be accessible and under what circumstances. He highlights concerns that the FOI changes could limit scrutiny despite the stated intent to protect personal information. Opposition voices, including the NDP and Liberal leaders, criticize the move as undermining democracy. One speaker states, “Democracy dies in darkness,” arguing the budget bill is being used to hide government actions from Ontarians. The concern is that the changes would reduce transparency not only for the premier’s government but for all governments and all parties, affecting the public service and how billions of dollars are accounted for each year. Speaker 3 emphasizes the need for the public to know how the government uses the funds it receives annually, underscoring the role of FOI in keeping government accountable. The session notes that today’s vote occurred as the legislature plans a break tomorrow and a recess for the entire next week. Liberal leaders indicate they will use that time to propose additional motions to revisit and reopen debate on FOI provisions, attempting to block or modify the changes. They plan to bring more motions to surface the issue and seek greater public discussion and scrutiny, aiming to stop the FOI changes from taking effect.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Speaker 1: ayes being 57, the nays being 33. I declare the motion carried. Speaker 2: MPPs from the opposition yelling shame and FOI while the vote was taking place. That's why members of the Ford government voted in favor of the FOI changes and the rest of the budget bill. The FOI law will limit public and media access to certain government documents, effectively keeping records and information and data involving premier Ford, his cabinet from scrutiny, and that's going to be retroactive as well. So any requests that have been made before now may not come forward. The new legislation would normally go to a committee. The public would have a chance to weigh in at that point before any proposed changes. But after a late night session in the legislature last night, that was fast tracked to a vote today, and it's gone forward. Speaker 0: We're not taking people's rights. You folks will have lots of access. You have lots of tools. That will continue. We'll continue to debate bills in the house. We are gonna continue to I'm out every ninety days telling the people how I spent their money. Speaker 2: Premier Ford has, throughout all of this, said that 95% of information would still be accessible and that it would be limited to 5% that wouldn't be made public. However, there has been dispute over that, and the idea that some information would still be made available. He's talking about how it would be to protect personal information. That's the type of information that would be redacted at that point and wouldn't be made available anyway. So there's lots of dispute over that. And, of course, the opposition leaders, both the NDP and the liberal had something to say about that as well. Speaker 1: Democracy dies in darkness, and this government has used their budget bill, and I will say budgets are moral documents. They have used their budget bill as a way to do to hide from the people of Ontario. Speaker 3: People of Ontario aren't gonna know what's going on in their government, and it's not just for the premier's government. It's for all governments. It's for all parties. It's for all people working in the public service. Right? That's why we have those things so people know how the government is using the billions of dollars that they send them they send to government every year. Speaker 2: So the vote happened today as a result of the legislature taking another break tomorrow and all next week before returning. However, the Liberal Party has said at that point they plan on trying to introduce more motions to bring the FOI back to the surface to try and have more debate and can and see what more they can do to try and stop this from happening.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 20, 2026 at 5:23 AM
Saved - April 21, 2026 at 5:45 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I say RFK Jr claims it wasn’t 400, but 500 hospices shut down in Los Angeles. He alleges none called to complain; 100% were fraud. These fake California hospices created fake addresses, then would approach poor neighborhoods and pay residents $600 flat-screen TVs in exchange for their patient IDs. They billed taxpayers thousands per patient, also paid for lists of patients, and began billing for them. Not a single California Democrat has been held accountable.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

RFK Jr says it wasn’t 400 hospices they shut down in Los Angeles, it was 500 He confirms not a single one has called to complain, 100% were fraud These fake California hospices made fake addresses, then would go to poor neighborhoods and buy residents $600 flat screen TVs, in exchange they would give them their patient identification These fraudulent hospice companies would then bill thousands of dollars to taxpayers for each one They would also pay for lists of patients too and begin billing for them Not a single California Democrat has been held accountable

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've shut down 500 hospices in Los Angeles. Incidentally, we haven't had one call from Congress or anybody else about complaining because clearly, these were fraudulent. A lot of these places, you'd say, they'd have, they were just invented addresses. They would obtain patient identification or they would pay people. They were going and giving people in poor neighborhoods flat screen televisions $600 and then they would enlist them and enroll them in the hospice and we were paying them $6,000.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've already shut down 500 hospices in Los Angeles. And and incidentally, we haven't had one call from congress or anybody else about complaining because clearly, these were fraudulent. A lot of these places, you'd say, they'd have, they were just invented addresses. They would obtain patient identification or they would pay people. They were going and giving people in poor neighborhoods flat screen televisions $600 and then they would enlist them and enroll them in the hospice and we were paying them $6,000.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 18, 2026 at 2:15 AM
Saved - April 18, 2026 at 5:06 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The Georgia Court of Appeals ruled for Sandersville Railroad, enabling a private eminent-domain seizure of family farmland—some held by Black families with roots dating to slavery—for a quarry spur. Families call it an abuse of government power for private gain and will take the case to the Supreme Court. A responder argues the decision amounts to a corporate takeover, says the use isn’t public, and warns descendants to take notice of possible SCOTUS involvement.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The Georgia Court of Appeals just sided with Sandersville Railroad, giving the private company the power to take family farmland Land that has been with families since the civil war, including some Black families whose ancestors farmed the land dating back to slavery times must be given to the railroad Families and farmers say this is a ‘an abuse of eminent domain: a private company using government power to take land primarily for its own benefit’ They plan to fight it in the Supreme Court

@JLHunter1984 - J. L. Hunter

@WallStreetApes They didn’t just lose in court. They got railroaded by a fckin railroad. Eminent domain for a quarry spur isn’t public use...it's corporate takeover. Every farmer, every homeowner, every descendant of anyone who worked this soil just got put on notice. SCOTUS? You notice? 🇺🇸

WallStreetApes
Posted - April 16, 2026 at 12:52 AM
Saved - April 16, 2026 at 5:01 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I read that smoke detectors in bathrooms and public schools have built‑in microphones and sensors to monitor speech patterns, count occupants, and analyze aggression. They can be programmed to pick up keywords and could be configured to detect discussions about specific topics.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Smoke detectors in bathrooms and public schools are capable of monitoring speech patterns “These are sold for public safety, especially in education” The smoke detectors have built in microphones and censors that can tell how many people are in the room, analyzes the speech patterns to determine aggressive behavior They can by programmed to pick up key words Which means, they could be programmed to pick up someone talking about something specific…

WallStreetApes
Posted - April 14, 2026 at 4:44 AM
Saved - April 15, 2026 at 12:50 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I live 1.6 miles from the META Data Center in Wisconsin. My water system is destroyed. Discharge turns the Beaver Dam Creek white like milk; testing shows high heavy metals, including elevated strontium. For almost 50 years a natural creek on my horse farm, 20 feet wide and up to four feet deep, flowed through a connected groundwater system. Since upstream construction, it stops without rainfall and returns opaque with force, causing drastic erosion.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Woman who lives only 1.6 miles from the META Data Center in Wisconsin speaks out She says their water system has been completely destroyed She says there is discharge that turns the entire river white like milk. She paid for testing and found extremely high heavy metal levels “I live on a horse farm and I am an educator. I, for almost four 50 years, a natural creek has flowed through my property. It's 20 feet wide, up to four feet deep. It has persisted through drought, flood, seasonal change. It's part of a connected system. Groundwater, tributaries, watersheds, aquifers ultimately flowing into Beaver Dam Lake. Until construction began upstream on the data center, its behavior was stable and predictable After construction started, all of that changed. Here in Beaver Dam, the creek began to stop flowing entirely without rainfall. It would abruptly return off in cloudy and opaque like milk, with enough force to cause drastic erosion and damage — Water testing on my property shows elevated strontium, a very dangerous metal, and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Miley Kaczynski, a lifelong Wisconsin resident living 1.6 miles downstream from the Meta Data Center in Beaver Dam, describes dramatic changes to a natural creek on her horse farm that have followed upstream construction. The creek, a 20-foot-wide, up-to-four-feet-deep waterway, had flowed reliably for decades as part of a connected system feeding into Beaver Dam Lake, until construction began upstream. Since then, the creek has stopped flowing even without rainfall, often returning only during brief wet periods, and when it does flow, it is sometimes cloudy and erodes the banks. This pattern has repeated dozens of times over a single construction season, leaving the creek dry half the time. Dust from construction covers her yard, turning grass white, and heavy dust plumes make her unable to see the hood of her truck while driving past the site. She notes this behavior is not consistent with natural variability or weather patterns and had never happened before. Kaczynski attempted to report these concerns to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), but found the system fragmented: reports are passed between departments and some are lost. She learned there is no single entity responsible for downstream impacts when large-scale construction disrupts a water system. Different permits govern activities locally, at the county and state levels, and some at the federal level. She emphasizes that this is a policy failure, not a failure of individual agency staff. She asserts that the law favors businesses over residents and that the creek’s flow appears correlated with upstream industrial activity, including daily blasting with dynamite during construction. When that discharge stops, the creek stops; when it resumes, water returns abruptly. Kaczynski highlights that corporations receive fast approvals and tax incentives with limited review, while residents must prove damage after the fact, at their own expense, against billion-dollar companies. She has spent significant time researching this issue (ten to twenty hours per week) and has faced high costs for water testing on her property (shipping a sample costs $121, with the test around $400 per test). Her property shows elevated strontium and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence, changes that coincide with upstream blasting and excavation, warranting independent investigation. If left unresolved, filters and additional testing could cost over $1,000, and her backyard footprint will be converted from permeable land to a paved industrial space of nearly 1,000 acres after construction. She explains the broader community impact: rural farmers and families cannot compete with corporate land purchases, leading to a loss of Wisconsin’s working landscapes as new projects fill in. A second data center is proposed in Beaver Dam. The city annexed land from her township, with Alliant Energy negotiating with farmers to sell collectively; once annexed by the city, rezoning proceeds to county oversight and is described as a rubber-stamp process. By the time residents learn it is a data center, it is too late to stop it. Township residents feel unrepresented—she lacks a representative at the city level, cannot legally prove damage before construction, and is left to navigate a system that she says is not prepared to protect residents. Kaczynski asks who will save her and others, noting that retroactive bills and a missing safety net leave them vulnerable. She ends by urging transparency and action, expressing gratitude for the hearing but lamenting that her full story has not been heard.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Miley Kaczynski and I live 1.6 miles downstream from the Meta Data Center in Beaver Dam. If you need to stand and stretch for a moment, do. I have never in my life needed a group of people to be more alert to what I have to say. Thank you for staying so long. I'm a lifelong Wisconsin resident. I live on a horse farm and I am an educator. For almost fifty years, a natural creek has flowed through my property. It's 20 feet wide, up to four feet deep. It has persisted through drought, flood, seasonal change. It's part of a connected system, brown water, tributaries, watersheds, aquifers, ultimately flowing into Beaver Dam Link. Until construction began upstream on the data center, its behavior was stable and predictable. After construction started, all of that changed here in Beaver Dam. The creek began to stop flowing entirely. Without rainfall, it would abruptly return, often cloudy and opaque like milk with enough force to cause drastic erosion and damage. This pattern repeated itself dozens of times over a single construction season to the point that it is dry half of the time. Dust from the construction covers my yard. My grass is white, and I'm 1.6 miles away. When I drive past it, I have to pull over because the dust cloud is so thick that I can't see of the hood of my truck. That behavior is not consistent with natural variability. It is not explained by weather patterns, and it has never happened before. So I did what residents are told to do. I called up the Department of Natural Resources. I spoke with dedicated staff, but the system is fragmented. My reports are passed between departments. Reports are lost. And at one point, I was told the agency didn't even know if they had clear authority over what was going on. What I learned in this process is there is no single entity responsible for what happens downstream when large scale construction disrupts a water system. Different permits govern different activities locally, county level, state level, some even federal. No one is tasked at looking at the whole picture or what happens beyond the project boundary. This is not a failure of individual agency staff. It's a policy failure. The law is on the side of the businesses and not on the residents. In my case, the creek's flow now appears correlated with industrial activity upstream in the times when that construction took place, including daily blasting with dynamite. When that discharge stops, my creek stops. When it resumes, water returns suddenly. Right now, corporates are receiving fast approval tax incentives, limited review, while residents are left to prove the damage after the fact at our own expense against billion dollar companies. This research has become my part time job. Ten to twenty hours a week I have spent since knowing it was a data center, trying to figure out what's happening to my land. Simply sending in a water sample from my property costs a $121 just to ship the sample. The cost of the test alone is going to be another $400 every time I have it tested. Water testing on my property shows elevated stronium, a very dangerous metal and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence. A change that coincides with large x scale excavation blasting upstream and warrants independent investigation. Filters on my water system to stop this, elevated metal, persistence in my water is going to be over $1,000. When construction is complete, nearly 1,000 acres of my backyard will be converted from living permeable land into a paved industrial space. Land that once actively recharge groundwater, aquifers, and watersheds. That change reshapes an entire community. Farmers and local families cannot compete with billion dollar corporations to pay for that land. And over time, the places that defined Wisconsin, rural communities, working landscapes, they're being replaced, and then the next project arrives to fill in that spot because nobody is building a home next to a data center. People are leaving. Now there's another open spot like a second data center now being proposed in Beaver Dam. The city annexed this land from my township. I was there at the meeting when they were talking to the farmers. Alliant Energy sent a representative in to broker the deal with all the farmers in the area. If we can find a a buyer for the whole shebang, well, you all sell at the same time. They had ten years to find a buyer. They knew exactly what they were doing, and they knew exactly who was going to buy that land, but we did not. Once it got annexed by the city, it goes to the county for rezoning. That is a rubber stamp in the process. There is nothing we can legally do to stop it at that point. Because you have to prove it is damage damaging to people's health. And we cannot legally prove damage. Before it's built. So it goes through. So you have to stop it at the city level if you want to speak up. But the city level proposed a conversation at their meeting about a tid, not about a data center. By the time we knew it was a data center, it was too late to do anything. And the residents of the township have to live now with the negative impacts of a data center that is on city properly property, and I'm not represented by the city. I don't have a representative to speak for me. I bought the property to have horses across from my childhood home. My parents live across the street with their horses. I wanted to be here forever. I can't even leave. I am trapped here because nobody wants to buy my land. They don't wanna be near a data center, and they don't want a 20 foot empty ditch in the front yard. I am concerned at the the idea that there does not seem to be a working, system in place to make sure that permits are being followed. We can issue them left and right. There's not enough staff. There is one mining permit officer in the DNR for the entire state of Wisconsin. There's a minor on that flag. We have one guy for the whole state to make sure people are doing what they're supposed to be doing in that particular area. There's not enough, and yes I nodded when the data center guy was up here because I agree that eight forty does not do enough, and he put his foot in his own mouth. He said we want to work with communities, then do it. Why do you need a bill to do it? Do it. Be transparent. And one thing I have not heard anyone, today share or talk up about is are these bills retroactive? Who is coming to save me? My safety net is gone. My my township cannot say no to being annexed by the city. My city doesn't represent me. And here I sit before you. I I'm counting on you. I need you. It's too late for me. I didn't get to vote no. I didn't get to speak up. I have two minutes at a public hearing at the city, and I am so grateful that you let us sit here so late tonight. Nobody has let me tell my whole story. Please, metaphorically, we are launching planes that are still being built, and we are forced to pilot them, and we don't know how to fly. Thank you for your time. Thank you for being here.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 13, 2026 at 11:00 AM
Saved - April 13, 2026 at 5:45 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
WOAH. Just days before Rep Ayanna Pressley’s swearing-in, her husband quit a $92k job to start a consulting firm. Net worth with assets reportedly jumped to $8M. Every time you see a politician with a 'consulting firm' it’s taxpayer money laundering.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 JUST DAYS before Democrat Rep Ayanna Pressley was sworn into Congress, her husband quit a $92,000 a year job TO START A CONSULTING FIRM Net worth with assets skyrocketed to $8 million Every time you see a politician with a ‘consulting firm’ its taxpayer money laundering https://t.co/GeAQ4DeniI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox News reports allege wealth increases among prominent progressive lawmakers. The segment claims Ilhan Omar is worth up to $30,000,000, noting she rose from negative net worth when first elected to Congress to substantial wealth, with a husband who is a consultant. The piece centers on Ayanna Pressley, stating that when she was elected in 2018 she had a negative net worth, but today she is worth $1,300,000 with assets up to $8,000,000. It highlights property holdings in 2024: a Martha’s Vineyard rental worth up to $5,000,000 and multiple Boston rentals worth up to $1,000,000 each, contrasting with 2019 when she reportedly owned only one property in Boston. The report also notes that days before Pressley was sworn in, her husband left a $92,000-a-year Boston City Hall job to launch Conan Harris and Associates, a consulting firm. It states his income reportedly jumped while in Washington, with a client list including government organizations and one with deep ties to the Obama Foundation. The segment describes ethics concerns about using his city-issued email to pitch Walsh’s Chief of Staff on staying on as a consultant, while city officials say they did not solicit nor accept the offer and that ethics laws bar municipal employees from using official resources for personal gain. Pressed for comment, Pressley did not respond to Fox Business requests. Fox Business anchor David Asman appears to align with the report’s framing, acknowledging that wealth accumulation through government contacts is common but asserting questions arise about those who position themselves as anti-capitalist. David Asman contrasts the situation with what he describes as anti-capitalist squad members who denounce capitalism yet accumulate wealth, asserting that Pressley and her fellow squad members “condemn capitalism” while “she’s the one who’s been pillaging the government,” and noting her husband’s consulting income. The discussion broadens to Ilhan Omar, claimed to be worth up to $30,000,000, with a husband who is also a consultant and previously connected to progressive circles with alleged anti-capitalist leanings. The segment references Nancy Pelosi as part of a broader pattern, describing her as “the grand dam of all this,” and asserts she is worth about $275,000,000, with husband Paul Pelosi, suggesting insider information influenced certain trades tied to credit card companies. The speakers argue that such patterns illustrate long-standing issues, vowing continued investigation and pressure to stop perceived abuses. Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 close with remarks that this situation requires ongoing scrutiny, and they thank David Asman for the discussion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a Fox News alert. It looks like Ilhan Omar isn't the only millionaire squad member. Our team dug into open secrets and financial disclosure reports. What we found is that when Ayanna Pressley was elected to Congress back in 2018, she had a negative net worth. You fast forward to today, she's worth $1,300,000 with assets worth up to 8,000,000. Now that's a massive increase in just six years, especially for someone on a $174,000 congressional salary. It's impressive, really. But how did she do it? Well, part of its property in 2024, Presley reported owning a Martha's Vineyard rental worth up to $5,000,000 as well as multiple Boston rentals worth up to $1,000,000 each. Now for context, back in 2019, she only reported owning one property in Boston. We're also learning days before Presley was sworn into Congress, her husband quit his $92,000 annual Boston City Hall job to start his own consulting firm called Conan Harris and Associates. And as we read more of the congresswoman's financial disclosure reports, we learned that her husband also saw his income jump while he was in Washington. His client list consists of some government organizations, including one with deep ties to the Obama Foundation. But as he started his firm and seek new clients, he faced ethics concerns because of Presley's job in Congress. As Harris's days dwindled in the city's Office of Public Safety, he used his city issued email account to pitch Walsh's Chief of Staff on staying on as a consultant. City officials say they did not solicit nor accept the offer, and state ethics laws bar municipal employees from knowingly using official resources for personal gain. Now we asked Presley for comment, and we even invited her on. She did not answer, but Fox Business anchor David Asman joins me now. He's been looking over this information, and David, there's nothing wrong with, you know, gaining financial resources. We see this a lot in congress, but there are questions. Speaker 1: Well, you go back to the 1930s, the last when movies began, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. I mean, it's happened for a long time. It happens in both the right and left, but what's so rich is that this is coming from anti capitalist squad members. Know? Yes. People who spent their life denigrating our capitalist system and saying how bad it was. In fact, congresswoman Presley came out with an ex post just a year ago. She and her fellow squad members, of course, constantly condemn capitalism, but she says Donald Trump and Musk want big banks and bad actors to run rampant and take people for a ride. They want to pillage the government and make themselves rich. Well, she's the one who's been pillaging the government. Now again, we're not suggesting she's going in and stealing funds or anything like that, but the fact is she got rich off of her contacts in government. Her husband got rich consulting with members of the business community and others, perhaps some people who were taking grants. That's, by the way, we saw that with Lee Zeldin, the EPA Commissioner. When he came in, he found out that right before Biden left office in December 2024, he was spending billions of dollars. A lot of that money was going directly to friends, you know, to acquaintances within the Democratic community that learned how to go in and write grants that would get accepted, making millions and millions of dollars each one of them. So, this has been going on for a while. I should mention that Presley's kind of a poor gal next to her friend Ilhan Omar. Yes. Because Ilhan Omar is worth up to $30,000,000 right now because, and she went from basically a flat to negative, if not negative point when she came into Congress. She also has a husband who's a consultant. He was working with progressive leftists who, again, have this anti capitalist creed which they live and die by, but apparently, they, it's very easy to condemn capitalism when you're making millions of dollars, And of course, we have to mention the grand dam of all this, which is Ms. Pelosi. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: Who's worth about $275,000,000 at least $275,000,000 with her husband Paul, who, and, you know, he's a good investor, but she's come to him, I'm sure, with excellent inside information that we're not allowed to trade on, but members of Congress still do, and there are certain trades that she and her husband made that clearly were based on information she was getting about credit card companies that were going to have a particular advantage that other companies didn't have. A lot of So this has got to stop. We've tried to stop it time and time again. Again, going back decades and decades, it never seems to work properly. Schweizer has done his best to try to try to come out with revealing stuff, but we're going to continue investigating and put pressure on the politicians to stop this once and for all. Speaker 0: David Asman, thank you. Lots of questions here.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 11, 2026 at 3:37 AM
Saved - April 11, 2026 at 12:17 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m hearing new changes are coming to how Palantir will track Americans’ financial information. This AI-driven tool will score every taxpayer and generate ranked targets for audits, collections, or criminal investigations. There’s a lot more coming. This is horrifying.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

New changes are coming to how Palantir is going to start tracking Americans' financial information This new AI-driven tool will score every American taxpayer and generates ranked lists of targets for audits, collections, or criminal investigations But there’s a lot more coming too The is actually horrifying

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses recent changes in how Palantir is used to track Americans’ financial information and the potential impact on privacy, in the context of a legislative vote scheduled for the week of April 13. Key points: - Palantir’s Foundry platform, described as Palantir’s civilian platform, has been inside the IRS since 2017. It connects databases containing bank statements, IRS filings, and financial transactions to identify patterns for investigations. It has helped investigators by finding patterns they might miss. - The IRS has paid Palantir more than $200 million for this work. Historically, the use of Foundry was limited to cases that were already open, with investigators having a formal reason to look and an active investigation. - In December 2024, the IRS paid Palantir $1.8 million to build a tool called SNAP, standing for the selection and analytic platform. SNAP is described as taking the human out of the equation, scoring every American taxpayer and generating a ranked list of who the government should target next for audits, collections, and criminal investigations. - In the following months, the IRS paid Palantir an additional $2.25 million to expand SNAP. SNAP reportedly will pull transaction data from platforms like Venmo, Etsy, Depop, and Cash App. The threshold for reporting on these platforms reportedly dropped to $600 this year, expanding the scope of potentially flagged activities (including small-scale transactions such as selling a used couch or freelance dog walking). - There is concern about legality. In June 2025, ten members of Congress wrote to Palantir’s CEO suggesting the program likely violates the Privacy Act of 1974 and federal tax privacy laws, which limit tax information use to tax-related purposes. The IRS’s top lawyer reportedly agreed but was removed from the position two days after making that statement. - Two short-term actions are proposed: 1) Remove oneself from data broker databases to shrink the government’s data footprint, since it can access real-time location data, phone numbers, and spending habits through third-party data brokers without warrants. California residents can use privacy.california.gov/drop to send deletion requests to over 500 data brokers; the service is described as quick (about five minutes). Non-Californians can use services like Incogni or DeleteMe, with caveats about due diligence and potential fees. 2) Contact Rick Crawford, chair of the House Intelligence Committee, to push for warrant protections in FISA reauthorization. The vote is scheduled for the week of April 13. Crawford’s DC office number is (202) 225-4076, and the speaker demonstrates making a call to advocate for warrant requirements. The speaker emphasizes that if the legislation passes without protections, broader discussions about compliance and oversight will be necessary, and encourages viewers to begin by removing data footprints and calling Crawford.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There has been some really recent changes as to how Palantir is going to start tracking Americans' financial information. And I don't wanna scare anybody, but I do think that this is really important to talk about, especially right now because there's legislation that is being voted on next week on April 13, and we need to make sure that it doesn't pass without there being some protections in there for all of us. So what a lot of people I don't think realize is that Palantir's Foundry platform, which is their civilian platform, has been inside the IRS since 2017. And what it's done is connected all of these databases that contain your bank statements, your our IRS filings, your financial transactions, all of that stuff, and it would find patterns across it for investigate. If someone was suspected of, let's say, fraud, then Foundry could pull that someone's financial information and run an analysis over it and find patterns that maybe a human analyst might miss. And over the years, the IRS has paid Palantir more than $200,000,000 for that level of work. But there was always a caveat in that system, and that was the scope because that system was only to be used on cases that were already open, meaning that an investigator already had to suspect something was up, there had to be a formal filed investigation, and they had to have this reason to look. And then Foundry would then help them look faster. But something has changed recently that we need to talk about because in December 2024, the IRS had paid Palantir $1,800,000 to build a tool called SNAP, which stands for the selection and analytic platform. And, yes, that is SNAP, the same acronym as the food benefit program. So make of that what you will. What's dangerous about SNAP is that it takes the human out of the equation. So SNAP doesn't wait for an investigator to open a case on you or have a reason to look at you. The algorithm scores every American taxpayer and generates this ranked list of who the government should target next. And this is for audits, collections, for criminal investigations. I mean, truly, it is endless what they could flag you. And the reason I say recently is because even though this has been in development since December 2024, the IRS just last month paid Palantir another $2,250,000 to expand Snap further. And Snap doesn't just read your tax return either. According to this expansion, it's going to be able to pull transaction data from places like Venmo, Etsy, Depop, and Cash App. And this year, according to reports, the threshold for reporting on those platforms has dropped to $600. $600. So that's anyone who's selling a used couch on Facebook marketplace to a freelancer who walks dogs on the weekend. By the way, I got rid of Venmo, like, two years ago because I don't trust the PayPal mafia of it all. Like, knowing that Peter Thiel co founded PayPal and Palantir is a big enough red flag for them not to handle any of my transaction history. And that's gonna be a big one, so I recommend getting rid of that if I were you. Personally, I use Apple Pay because it's a little bit safer in that Apple doesn't keep a social feed of your transactions and has never given the government direct server access to those transactions. I mean, it's still subject to IRS reporting rules for businesses, but it's a lot cleaner than those other options. Is this even legal? Well, it's complicated, really, because in June 2025, 10 members of Congress did write to Palantir CEO and say that this likely violates the privacy act of 1974 and federal tax privacy laws, which says that your tax information cannot be used for anything unrelated to taxes, that it is a federal crime. And the IRS's top lawyer did agree with that, but he was swiftly removed from his position two days after saying that on the record in 2025. Now there are two things you can do about this right now, both of which are short term fixes, but it'll at least give you something to do so you're not just a puddle of anxiety. The first thing is going to be to remove yourself from all data broker databases. Because like I said, the government is not just using IRS data. They are going to be using your real time location data, your phone number, and any spending habits that they find through social media or any third party data broker that they can buy it from. Because buying that information does not require a warrant, and that is how they get around the court system. So you can shrink that footprint. I can only speak to California because that's where I live, so each state is gonna have its own rules on how to do this. But if you live in California, then you can go to privacy.california.gov/drop. And I'll insert a video here of what you're supposed to do while you're there. Basically, it's a free website that's run by the state. It's one form. It sends deletion request to over 500 data brokers and databases across The US at once, and it takes all of five minutes. It's definitely worth it. I just did it this morning. If you're not in California, you could look at services like Incogni or DeleteMe. Full disclosure, I'm not sponsored by them. I've never worked with them. I've never used their platform. So do your due diligence. But from what I understand, it's the same thing with a small fee attached. Now the next thing you can do is call Rick Crawford this week. Now I'm not kidding around. This is the most important thing every single one of you should be doing. Okay? Crawford is the House Intelligence Committee chair, and he controls whether FISA reauthorization goes to vote with or without any warrant protections. The vote is scheduled for the week of April 13. That is next week. That is a few days away. So everybody needs to call him right now or tomorrow. K? His DC office number is (202) 225-4076. You don't have to be from Arkansas. Any American can call him. In fact, I'm gonna call him right now and show you how to do it. Okay? Because I know it can be scary sometimes. I'm gonna have to put you guys on my computer screen. One sec. Speaker 1: Thank you for calling the office of congressman Rick Crawford. I'm sorry we could not answer your call. If you'd like to leave an opinion for the congressman, please give us your name, the county you are calling from, and a brief message. If you are in need of assistance, please give us your name, an email address, or a phone number, and a brief message detailing the issue you need help with, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. Thank you, and have a wonderful day. Speaker 0: Hi. My name is Audrey Henson, and I'm calling to request that chairman Crawford add warrant requirements to the FISA authorization before it goes to the floor. I just don't think that the fourth amendment should have loopholes like this in it, and the government should not be able to buy data from third parties. So please be on the right side of history with this. This is going to affect you and your family too. Thank you. I'm not good at that. Now, if legislation doesn't pass with protections, if the government thinks that they can keep building a system with no oversight and no public vote, then we need to have a much bigger conversation about what compliance means when the system that you're complying with is being used against you, if you're picking up what I'm putting down. But that is a bigger conversation with pretty big consequences, and nobody should be having that conversation alone. So the first step is to do just what I did, and and call his office and try to delete your data, and we'll start there. And we'll see what next week brings.
WallStreetApes
Posted - March 31, 2026 at 3:27 AM
Saved - March 31, 2026 at 5:45 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I claim Muslims are practicing Sharia in Plano, Texas. A Muslim at East Plano Islamic Center is with his underage wife, and the investigator says he has three more underage wives at home, insisting, “It’s already happening right here in Plano.”

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American says Muslims are already practicing Sharia Law in Plano, Texas A Muslim is seen at the East Plano Islamic Center with his very underage wife Investigator says he has 3 more underage wives at home “She is his wife. Yes, his wife. Please spare me your denials of Sharia law could never happen in America because it's already happening right here in Plano. And this is all over. He's got three more little wives at home too, by the way.”

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 30, 2026 at 5:44 AM
Saved - March 31, 2026 at 4:18 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that Ayaan Hirsi Ali warns of a planned Islamic takeover in the U.S., citing Dawah manuals and mosques funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar to promote a hostile belief system. She says Muslims infiltrate government, media, education, and family; establishing student associations to islamize institutions, with the same strategy for government and media. She argues discussing political Islam is taboo and Islamophobia invented, equating dissent with bigotry.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Member of the House of Representatives of the Netherlands, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, warns America of the planned Islamic takeover She says there are actual manuals that were created by Muslim leaders to take over the United States, and they’re being followed “The establishment of mosques of Islamic centers that are paid for by governments like Saudi Arabia and Qatar to promote, assist a belief system that is hostile and that is designed to replace the existing our American system. — It is gradual. It is a match through the systems, through government, through the media, through education, through the family. And I'm not making these things up. — You can access all this information. You can get these Dawah manuals and just read for yourself how they set out their strategies, get into campuses, establish Muslim student associations. The Muslim student associations, they're given tools and tactics and to islamize that particular institution. And it's the same for government, the same for media. And it's working. It's working because right now you cannot discuss political Islam. It's been made a taboo, a time Islamophobia has been invented. That makes you, especially — a white man, it, it uses your own vulnerabilities against you because the minute you start to question their goals, their objectives, you're not having a conversation about those particular facts. We are going to have a conversation about you are bigotry”

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 29, 2026 at 3:54 PM
Saved - March 29, 2026 at 9:11 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that California election fraud is exposed in Riverside county’s Prop 50 redistricting: nearly 50,000 votes created. Handwritten logs show 611,428 ballots received; certified total to the SOS was 657,322. About 45,896 votes (~7%) added without explanation. Sheriff seized over 650,000 ballots for a hand count. AG Bonta calls warrants unprecedented and legally deficient. Democrats are rigging our elections.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

California Election Fraud has been officially exposed. A ballot discrepancy was found in Riverside county for the Prop 50 redistricting Nearly 50,000 votes in just one county seem to have been created out of thin air - Handwritten logs from the Registrar of Voters show 611,428 ballots received - The official certified total reported to the Secretary of State was 657,322 votes - 45,896 votes roughly 7% of the county total were allegedly added without any explanation Sheriff Chad Bianco launched a criminal investigation and obtained court-issued search warrants and seized over 650,000 ballots from the Registrar’s office to conduct his own hand count Democrat California Attorney General Rob Bonta calls this move “unprecedented” and “legally deficient,” arguing the warrants lacked probable cause of a specific crime Democrats are rigging our elections

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ramin begins by noting that California said 657,000 people voted in Riverside County on Prop 50, but the registrar’s handwritten logs show 611,000 ballots came through the door—a gap of 45,896 ballots. He adds that a sheriff, sworn in with a badge and a court-issued warrant, says he’ll count those ballots himself, and the California attorney general “loses his mind” over the idea of stopping someone from counting paper. Speaker 1 clarifies the numbers: the registrar of voters’ logs show 611,428 ballots cast, while 657,322 votes were reported and certified to the secretary of state, a difference of 45,896 votes. Ramin uses a simple analogy to illustrate the discrepancy: if you squeeze 20 lemons and sell cups all afternoon, but someone later claims 28 cups were sold, eight cups exceed the supply. He says this is the gist of Riverside’s situation: 611,000 ballots entered, 657,000 votes certified, and a 45,896-vote gap, which he calls unacceptable. He emphasizes that this is not a local school board vote, but Gavin Newsom’s Prop 50, officially called the Election Rigging Response Act. Prop 50 gave Sacramento the power to overturn California’s independent redistricting commission and redraw all 52 congressional districts to benefit Democrats, with maps crafted by Democratic operatives and in effect through 2030. It passed statewide 64% to 36, with over 8,000,000 votes cast. Ramin notes that while the phantom Riverside votes did not flip the statewide result, the point is about potential partisan impact: Republicans currently hold the House by six seats, and California’s new maps are designed to flip five of those seats. He mentions representatives Kevin Kiley and Darrell Issa as examples of Republicans in districts that were redrawn to become more favorable to Democrats. If Democrats flip those seats in November 2026, they would take back the House. Buried within the election that made all of this possible is the 45,000-vote gap in a single county. He extrapolates: if Riverside County’s 7% turnout were representative of all 8,000,000 statewide votes, that could imply over 500,000 “ghost votes.” He explicitly says he is not asserting that this happened and that nobody knows, because no… (the excerpt ends abruptly).
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So California just told you that 657,000 people voted in Riverside County on prop 50. But the guy whose actual job it was to count those ballots, register our voters, his own handwritten logs say 611,000 ballots came through the door. That's a difference of 45,896 votes just gone or maybe just appeared. Nobody knows. Now here's where it gets good. A sheriff, an actual sheriff with a badge and a gun and a court issued warrant signed by a judge says, I'm gonna go count those ballots myself. And the California attorney general loses his mind. Why would you try to stop someone from counting paper? I'm Ramin. Let's dig in. Speaker 1: This investigation is very simple. The registrar of voters maintained handwritten logs of the total number of ballots coming into the ROV. An audit of those logs received from the Riverside County registrar of voters allegedly shows six eleven thousand four hundred and twenty eight ballots were cast, but six fifty seven thousand three twenty two votes were reported and certified to the secretary of state. That is a difference of forty five thousand eight ninety six votes. Speaker 0: So let me break this down like you're seven years old running a lemonade stand. Your mom gives you 20 lemons. You squeeze every single one. You sell cups all afternoon. At the end of the day, someone tells you you sold 28 cups of lemonade, but you only had 20 lemons. Where the other eight cups come from? And that's it. That's the whole story. That's what's happening in Riverside County right now. 611,000 ballots walked through the door. 657,000 votes got certified in Sacramento. And the people responsible for that 45,000 gap are saying, hey, trust us. It's fine. It's with unacceptable errors. Acceptable errors in an election for a ballot measure that redrew California's entire congressional map. I want you to remember that phrase, acceptable error. We're gonna come back to it in a second. Now let me give you the actual number. 45,896 votes. That's not a rounding error. That's not acceptable error. That's the population of a small city. That's a stadium full of people showing up without ballots. Because here's what people are missing. This wasn't some local school board vote. This was Gavin Newsom's baby. Prop 50 officially called the election rigging response act. This gave Sacramento the power to throw out California's independent redistricting commission and redraw all 52 congressional districts to benefit Democrats. Maps redrawn by Democratic operatives operatives in effect through 2030. It passed statewide 64% to 36%. Over 8,000,000 votes cast. So, yeah, the phantom votes at Riverside didn't flip the statewide result, but that's not the point. The point is this, Republicans currently hold the house by six seats. Six. California's new maps are designed to flip five of those seats. Reps like Kevin Kiley, Darrell Issa, guys in redrawn districts that just got a lot bluer overnight. Now if Democrats flip those seats in November 2026, they take back the house. And buried inside the election that made all of that possible, 45,000 votes that nobody can explain in one county. Now extrapolate. If Riverside County is 7% fan of vote rate existed across all 8,000,000 statewide votes, that's over 500,000 ghost votes, half a million. I'm not saying that happened. Nobody knows. Because no
WallStreetApes
Posted - March 27, 2026 at 2:11 AM
Saved - March 29, 2026 at 10:36 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I’m told Humboldt County uses grainy satellite images to identify unpermitted structures and then bills homeowners up to $12,000 a day, with liens as high as $900,000, risking tax sales. The county claims environmental protection, but residents say the Environmental Response Team targets cannabis sites to push people into legality and meet quotas. How is this different from mob rule?

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

California Democrats are using satellite images to find structures on residents properties, like a shed that wasn’t authorized to be built, and then sending them bills for as much as $12,000 per day One family received a notice the would have a $900,000 lien out on their home from the county How is one California county using cannabis and grainy satellite images to extort millions from homeowners? This is Doug and Kareen Thomas — They moved to Humboldt County after their home burned down in the L.A County wildfires, and 6 days later, their dream property turned into a nightmare. The county said a letter saying this barn was built without a permit, and prior owners did use it for growing weed. So they had 10 days to demo the barn or face fines of $12,000 per day. And ignoring the letter would result in a $900,000 lien placed on their property, which could then be sold at a tax sale. — How is this possible? Well, Humboldt County is part of the Emerald Triangle. For decades, it's been a hotspot for OG growers. And after California went legal, the county wanted its cut. So they created an environmental response team to supposedly protect a sensitive ecosystem. In reality, it was used to weed out black market growers and incentivize them into the legal industry. They'd use old grainy satellite images to look for unpermitted development, like barns, greenhouses, grading, and even the removal of too many trees, because those things must mean you're growing weed. However, in Humboldt, people have developed property and lived off the land without permits for generations. But the county didn't care. They had a quota to me, 50 permit violations a week. — How are Humboldt County's actions any different than mob rule?”

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 26, 2026 at 7:45 PM
Saved - March 27, 2026 at 5:01 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I observe private equity firms buying classic American chains like Carl’s Jr., Sonic, Arby’s, Buffalo Wild Wings, Jimmy John’s, Baskin-Robbins, Dunkin’, Auntie Anne’s, Subway, and more. They consolidate to cut labor, install their own operators, extract fees, and maximize profits, supposedly driving down quality while raising prices. They claim this is only the tip of the iceberg.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Private equity firms are buying classic American food restaurants and destroying the quality and raising prices Popular places now owned by private equity firms Carl’s Jr. Sonic Arby’s Buffalo Wild Wings Jimmy John’s Baskin-Robbins Dunkin’ Auntie Anne’s Moe’s Southwest Grill Jamba Carvel Schlotzsky’s McAlister’s Deli Cinnabon Hardee’s Miller’s Ale House Jim ’N Nick’s Community Bar-B-Q Subway “They've all been bought out by private equity firms. If you've noticed, the quality at food chains keeps getting worse while the prices increase. This is why — Private equity has been busy consolidating restaurants to cut labor, install their own operators, extract fees, and maximize profits” “This is only the tip of the iceberg”

View Full Interactive Feed