TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @alphafox
@alphafox - AlphaFox
Aaron was ended after this video because he refused to go along with made up child abuse allegations about Michael Jackson: https://t.co/hXYKrFqTTR
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts a sequence of events following a party, culminating in a confrontation with FBI agents. After leaving the party, the speaker says he smoked with someone nicknamed “nickel,” then got into a limousine and returned to the Sheraton Hotel at Universal, where four FBI agents were waiting in the hotel room. The speaker’s mom was present, urging him to tell the agents what happened. When asked to recount events, the speaker says the agents asked “super sexually exploiting, you know, questions, back backside questions,” and he immediately questions the premise: “are y’all crazy? I said, what do think I'm gonna do? Tell you that Michael did something bad so that we we can sue him for money?” He looks at his mom and expresses disbelief at why she would allow such questions, asking, “Why are you letting this happen?”
The speaker states his perspective on Michael, saying, “That man did nothing but be hospitable, kind, loving, giving, everything you could think of.” He explains that they had spent time together riding four-wheelers for several hours in the mountains at night after Michael’s birthday party, and that he, Michael, and Chris Tucker hung out and talked “pretty much all” of the time. The speaker emphasizes that the encounter with Michael was positive and that he did not understand why the FBI was pressing the sensitive questions or why his mother suggested there might be wrongdoing.
In summary, the speaker describes a night of hospitality and camaraderie with Michael (and Chris Tucker), followed by an FBI interview at the hotel room the next day in which intrusive questions were asked, prompting the speaker to defend Michael and challenging the motives behind the investigators’ line of questioning. The account highlights the contrast between the speaker’s personal memory of generosity and friendship with Michael and the formal, accusatory nature of the FBI interrogation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One boy Now listen to this. I have to tell you this. Okay. So after I left the party and the next day I smoked with nickel and then I get I get in the limousine and I leave. I get back to the Sheraton Hotel at Universal over here.
There's four FBI agents waiting for me in the hotel room. And my mom's there, and she's like, tell them what happened. And I'm like, what do you mean tell them what happened? And I sit down with them and they all get asked these super sexually exploiting, you know, questions, back backsided questions. And I knew that at my age already.
And I looked at all four of them and I said I said, are y'all crazy? I said, what do think I'm gonna do? Tell you that Michael did something bad so that we we can sue him for money? That's what I told him. I was like, you're and I looked over at my mom and I was like, are you serious, mom?
I was like, what is going on here? Why are you letting this happen? And she goes she goes, well, she goes, well, I think something happened. You know, I think something I'm like, really? That man did nothing but be hospitable, kind, loving, giving, everything you could think of.
We rode four wheelers, five hours, me, him, and Chris Tucker in the mountains at nighttime after his birthday party. Him and I hung out and talked pretty much all
@alphafox - AlphaFox
They thought the cameras were off: “Does the island come with children, or where can we abduct them from” 😳https://t.co/HCY6ClCILc
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss a location in Thailand, focusing on an island property. One speaker notes having been to Thailand before and describes the island setting as beautiful, mentioning there is a small villa on the island and implying it could be a suitable place to go with the island itself. They ask whether the island “comes with the children,” and then consider that the island has or could have a small school, stating “This island a does small school. There are children.” The conversation turns to which countries are near enough to abduct children from, with suggestions including Cambodia, Thailand, and Rome. The Philippines are then mentioned, with the speaker adding, “The Filipinos, you know, if they're not being a nurse, they're being your group. So Oh, true. Yeah.” The discussion shifts to age ranges, with a mention of “Below 10,” followed by uncertainty or incompleteness, “I don't I don't really.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This one's in Thailand. I've been in Thailand before. I didn't Beautiful. Beautiful. What comes with the island?
There's a small villa there. You could practically go with the island. There's there's only. Yeah. There's there's there's Did did the island come with the children or or the children This this island a does small school.
There are children. Okay. So I don't know about Yeah. If they're What countries are near to abduct them from? Cambodia, Thailand, Rome.
Yeah. No. Philippines? Philippi The Philippines. Of course.
The Filipinos, you know, if they're not being a nurse, they're being your group. So Oh, true. Yeah. So What age ranges? Below 10.
I don't I don't really
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on email leaks and allegations of hacking connected to a political context. One speaker notes that “one hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails,” suggesting a link between the leaks and his own communications. The group references those emails being public and questions about what might have been coincidental, with lines like “Just get lost into the public. One could say that there might those things might not have been a coincidence” and mentions “those things” that may or may not have been intended to surface.
Two days after the initial events, the speaker recounts that “the FBI contacted me, the first thing the agent said to me was, I don’t know if you’re aware, but your email account had might have been hacked.” He confirms awareness of the hacking, stating “I said yes,” and recalls a demand that he change how he is addressed, with references to being told, “From now on, you won’t call me your father,” and “I you will call me your father,” coupled with the assertion “You think you hide shit, don’t you? Just get lost.”
The dialogue shifts to broader implications: other campaign officials’ emails were divulged earlier than October 7, and the speakers discuss uncertainty about what exactly had been compromised, noting “there was a document that appeared to come from my account” and realizing “they had the contents of my email account.” The last time one speaker talked to the FBI is mentioned in the context of these disclosures.
A separate thread introduces media narratives, with a speaker asking, “Media is telling you the entire story is a hoax or fake news. But what does that even mean?” and stating, “I spent the last month investigating. So what exactly is Pizzagate? And are there any actual facts to support the story?” There is a sense of frustration about interpretation and evidence, captured in the line, “They’re hearing what they wanna hear. They’re not really listening to what I’m telling them.”
The transcript ends with a brief aside from another speaker, “What’s that?” indicating confusion or a request for clarification, tied to the ongoing discussion about the emails, hacks, and the Pizzagate inquiry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I will share this with you, Chuck. Listen
Speaker 1: up. What's my what's my name?
Speaker 0: One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails.
Speaker 2: You think you're hot shit, don't you?
Speaker 0: Just get lost into the public. One could say that there might those things might not have been a coincidence.
Speaker 1: Who you can see advertised, by the way, on this comet ping pong poster. What's my name? And if you don't know who John Podesta is, absolutely disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. My other name.
What do you call me? I am your father. Okay.
Speaker 0: Two days later, the FBI contacted me, the first thing the agent said to me was, I don't know if you're aware, but your email account had might have been hacked.
Speaker 1: When
Speaker 0: did you so? Yeah. I said yes.
Speaker 1: From now on, you won't call me your father. You're shocked. I you will call me your father.
Speaker 2: You think you're hot shit, don't you?
Speaker 1: Just get lost.
Speaker 0: I was aware of that.
Speaker 1: Aware that you had been hacked.
Speaker 0: I think I think that I was
Speaker 2: You think you hide shit, don't you?
Speaker 1: Just get lost. What am I what is my name?
Speaker 3: I'm just a kid who's four. Each day, I grow some more. I'm just singing. And
Speaker 0: other campaign officials also had their emails divulge earlier than October 7.
Speaker 2: You think you hide shit, don't you?
Speaker 0: Just get lost. But in one of those DNC dumps, there was a document that that that appeared to me was that appeared came might have come from my account. So I wasn't sure. I didn't know. I didn't know what they had, what they didn't have.
They were gonna all dump out. That's when I knew that they they had the contents of my my email account.
Speaker 3: By
Speaker 0: the way, that was the last time
Speaker 1: I talked to the FBI. Media is telling you the entire story is a hoax or fake news. But what does that even mean? I spent the last month investigating. So what exactly is Pizzagate?
And are there any actual facts to support the story?
Speaker 3: They're hearing what they wanna hear. They're not really listening to what I'm telling them. I was like, what's that?
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFoX
This is what 10 years of erosion looks like in North Carolina: 😮 https://t.co/8usiJNw6Of
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFoX
Now this is something I could see myself getting into: 🙌 https://t.co/SfzUf4TQMn
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is the Sierra log cabin from Lancaster log cabins, a 12 foot by 34 foot tiny home with bedroom, one bathroom, and a loft but enough space to sleep 10 people. This model has three different styles. This right here is the standard wood style but it also comes in a natural wood and a dark black wood. It is approximately 400 square feet constructed out of four by six tongue and groove eastern white pine logs and includes an exterior electrical box for connection to an external power source and an exterior condenser for the mini split air conditioning unit. The interior itself is stunning, and keep in mind everything you see here is included in the price from the bar stools to all the appliances. For this model, delivery and setup is included in the final price making the retail value just $75,000.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So are we just gonna ignore the fact that you can now get a tiny log cabin for this price? This is the Sierra log cabin from Lancaster log cabins, a 12 foot by 34 foot tiny home with bedroom, one bathroom, and a loft but enough space to sleep 10 people. This model has three different styles. This right here is the standard wood style but it also comes in a natural wood and a dark black wood. It is approximately 400 square feet constructed out of four by six tongue and groove eastern white pine logs and includes an exterior electrical box for connection to an external power source and an exterior condenser for the mini split air conditioning unit.
The interior itself is stunning, and keep in mind everything you see here is included in the price from the bar stools to all the appliances. Starting off in the living room, you have a vaulted ceiling with a view of the kitchen and the loft. There is a spot for a TV, couch, and a bar with a view out of one of the windows. In the kitchen, you have an electric stove and oven combo with a microwave and full refrigerator. There is plenty of counter space and a large sink to make cooking and cleaning much easier.
Headed towards the back of the home, you enter into a hallway area with a bunk bed and an entrance to the bathroom in which you'll find a sink, toilet, and a full shower. Located at the back of the home is the bedroom large enough for a queen bed and this is where you'll also find some closet and dresser space along with your mini split unit. And finally, in the loft above the kitchen in the hallway is a large open area perfect for an extra sleeping space or to do with whatever you would like. And lastly, we cannot forget to mention the front porch which sits at 10 feet by 11 feet 10 inches. This is the perfect place to have your morning coffee and connect with nature.
For this model, delivery and setup is included in the final price making the retail value just $75,000.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFoX
Remember when SNL was Sofa King funny? https://t.co/BaH2UnCDN6
Video Transcript AI Summary
And you know us from Mattress King? Where everything is. Here at Sofa King, we have all kinds of sofas. Leather, pleather, convertibles, sleeper sofas, sectionals, indoor, outdoor, conversation piece. All here at Sofa King. Nasir, I see you have found our 40 inch pillow back loveseat with separate decliner option. And how comfortable is it? It's Sofa King comfortable. You guessed on right it is. It's Sofa King comfortable. I could sit here all day. Now, my other son, Oman, how much is this set at other stores? $16.99. And how much is it at Sofa King? $7.49. Why? Because it's Sofa King cheap. So fucking cheap, man. You won't believe it. And if you buy now, no money down and no payments until 03/27/2008. That's easy financing. How easy, Nasir two? So fucking easy. It's sofa king easy. Sofa king, off of Route 13 in Sykakis. Sofa king, relax and have a good time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. It is me, Kadir Mutar.
Speaker 1: And I am Hazar Mutar.
Speaker 0: And you know us from Mattress King? Where everything is.
Speaker 2: Mattress King, Greg. Now we
Speaker 0: have opened it, Sofa King.
Speaker 1: And these are our songs. Not here or none or nothing too.
Speaker 0: Here at Sofa King, we have all kinds of sofas. Leather, pleather, convertibles, sleeper sofas, sectionals, indoor, outdoor, conversation piece.
Speaker 3: All here at Sofa King.
Speaker 0: How great is that?
Speaker 1: It's Sofa King great.
Speaker 0: Nasir, I see you have found our 40 inch pillow back loveseat with separate decliner option. And how comfortable is it?
Speaker 2: It's Sofa King comfortable.
Speaker 0: You guessed on right it is.
Speaker 2: It's Sofa King comfortable. I could sit here all day.
Speaker 0: Now, my other son, Oman, how much is this set at other stores?
Speaker 2: $16.99.
Speaker 0: And how much is it at Sofa King?
Speaker 2: $7.49. Why? Because it's Sofa King cheap.
Speaker 0: So fucking cheap, man. You won't believe it. And if you buy now, no money down and no payments until 03/27/2008. That's easy financing. How easy, Nasir two?
So fucking easy. It's sofa king easy. You could do it with your eyes, close it.
Speaker 1: Sofa king, get down here and buy some of our sofas.
Speaker 0: And as always, our delivery is sofa king quick. It
Speaker 2: will make your head spin. It's sofa king great. Sofa king, off of Route 13 in Sykakis. Sofa king, relax and have a good time.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
A 53 year old British white male was arrested for driving through a Liverpool parade - If it was any other race or gender we wouldn't know this for a month: https://t.co/mav773pkhH
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Walmart caught lying about the weight of the meat they are selling, marking it as heavier than it actually is. Makes sure you weigh it before you buy it! https://t.co/kJaMtEM3pC
Video Transcript AI Summary
A customer is alerting a store manager about a discrepancy in product weights and pricing. The customer states that a product labeled as 6.17 pounds actually weighs less than 4.5 pounds, while a lighter product is priced lower, despite appearing heavier. The customer claims this has happened before and that they lost money the previous time. They are informing the manager so the store can address the issue and prevent customers from being overcharged. The customer mentions reporting a similar issue at another Walmart to the scale and waste department in Austin. They do not want to purchase the mislabeled item but are buying other items.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is okay. How come this is supposed to be a lot heavier because it's got more weight on it than this one? This one's eighteen o two. I put this on the scale. It's at 4.3 pounds or something.
It has on here at six point one seven. This is the second time this happened to me, but fortunately, I caught it this time before I go on home. You just which one's heavier for you? This one, right? But if you look, this is only 2.98, two point nine two pounds or whatever it is.
This is six. This isn't six pounds, man. It's only four not even four and a half pounds. You guys are charging people for 6.17.
Speaker 1: That's a good one.
Speaker 0: I'm glad I caught it this time because last time I took it home and I was out out money on that. I I want this, but I'm just bringing this to your attention. You're a manager. Something needs to be done about this because how many other people that don't realize is that I'm not saying you, but the company in general is ripping off.
Speaker 1: What is it? I I get what you're saying. But are you are you did you already purchase this? No.
Speaker 0: I didn't purchase it.
Speaker 1: Alright. Which one
Speaker 0: is it? But I'm just saying.
Speaker 1: No. I I I totally exactly what you're saying. So is that what you wanted to tell me?
Speaker 0: Yes. That's all I want to tell you.
Speaker 1: Okay. Alright. Alright. I'm not I don't wanna take anything out to that, but do you say you don't want this or
Speaker 0: you don't No. I don't want it because it's it's it's showing that it's six point one seven pounds. But this is okay. Yeah. I'm taking all this.
Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. But I'm trying to report it now so that they can catch
Speaker 0: it. You know? Like I said, this is the second time it's happened to me. I've actually turned this Walmart into the scale and waste down in Austin. And they said if it happened again, contact them.
So I'm letting you guys know because I didn't let anybody else know before because when I opened it up, I was at home. And I had them on a scale because I'm like, this is a lot heavier than this, but that's more expensive. Look. That's $18. This is only $15.
That's $3 more, and I'm getting two pounds less. Yes, sir. Yes, sir. You see what I'm getting at?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. I'm good. I got you.
Speaker 0: That's it?
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
People express how they feel about the Snow White trailer. In song form. 😆 https://t.co/H1FlpsfkS2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker strongly dislikes a movie trailer, stating they would walk out even if watching on a plane. They criticize the casting, particularly Rachel Zegler, comparing her appearance to a "medieval squire boy."
The speaker claims Marvel has lost $237,000,000 and suggests Disney is declining in its ability to create stars, instead ending acting careers. They sarcastically imply Disney's creative direction is poor, joking that Mickey Mouse might become a dolphin. The trailer is so bad it makes Erby and Phil emotionally rewarded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If I saw this movie on a plane, I would still walk out. This trailer makes me wanna sit on the TV and look at my couch. I paid nothing to watch this trailer, but I one hack. Rick was a bold choice. Rachel Zagler looks like a medieval squire boy.
Marvel's lost $237,000,000. No white. Hold my beer. Disney used to make people famous. Now it ends acting It's Hollywood, baby.
I'm Michael Jordan. At this rate, Disney are gonna make Mickey Mouse a dolphin. This trailer makes Erby and Phil emotionally rewarded.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Two hummingbirds take refuge in a rose during summer rains: ☺️ https://t.co/xLkPAJVa8P
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Dont you wish you could experience this with your kids still? The smell, the excitement, the disappointment when they were sold out, the snacks.. https://t.co/wJ1kDAmZ1g
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
So @ChickfilA, why do you need 55 ingredients in just a peice of chicken?? https://t.co/Q0R507rIV7
Video Transcript AI Summary
This popular chicken sandwich has 55 ingredients and is detrimental to your health. The chicken contains sodium aluminum phosphate, an additive with aluminum, linked to neurological diseases. It also has soybean oil, one of the worst seed oils, which is linked to obesity, inflammation, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. It even has dimethylpolysiloxane, an industrial fluid used in breast implants and nail polish.
The bun is made of enriched wheat flour, basically fiberless. It spikes blood sugar and leads to crashes. Despite being called a buttery bun, it contains no butter; instead, it's made of butter-flavored soybean and palm oil. Foods like this make us sick, fat, unhealthy, and dependent on drugs. No wonder why 93% of adults are metabolically unhealthy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the most popular fast food item in America and it's killing you. This simple chicken sandwich has 55 ingredients in it. Let's go find out what's in it. One Chick fil A sandwich, please. Thank you so much.
This is the famous Chick fil A chicken sandwich. The chicken contains something called sodium aluminum phosphate, which is an additive that contains aluminum, which is known for neurological diseases. Next is soybean oil. This is one of the worst seed oils which is linked to causing obesity, inflammation, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. You also have something called dimethylpolysiloxane, which is an industrial fluid used in breast implants and nail polish.
Let's talk about the buttery bun next. Firstly, it's made of enriched wheat flour, which is an ultra processed wheat flour, which they basically has zero fiber. All this is gonna do is spike your blood sugar and have you crash after. Buttery bun, in fact, actually has zero butter on it. It actually is made of butter flavored soybean oil and palm oil.
If you look at the ingredient list, you will not find butter on it. It's foods like this that are killing us, making us sick, fat, and unhealthy, and hooked to pharmaceutical drugs that keep us sick. No wonder why ninety three percent of adults today are metabolic and healthy. Well, at least they're closed on Sundays. Right?
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I want to remind everyone to never forget our roots. While we're no longer posting on X, our Customer Support team remains available for any inquiries. You can stay updated with the latest BMW news by following us on Facebook and Instagram at BMWUK. It's important to acknowledge our history, including the fact that during WWII, BMW designed engines for Nazi fighter planes and supplied vehicles to the Nazis, utilizing slave labor in the process. The company also produced motorcycles for the Wehrmacht in various regions.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
During WWII, BMW designed engines for Nazi fighter planes like the Focke Wulf FW190. BMW supplied vehicles to the Nazis and used slave laborers during the war. The company produced motorcycles like the BMW R75 for the Wehrmacht in Russia and North Africa.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
@TuckerCarlson Aliens are real. https://t.co/wcFy8ts2er
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congress passed the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023, mandating the government to reveal what it knows about unidentified flying objects (UFOs). Despite evidence of non-human origin and testimonies from whistleblowers, powerful congressional members are allegedly obstructing transparency. Congressman Tim Burchitt expresses frustration over this cover-up, suggesting that the government may be hiding advanced nonhuman technology and possibly having communicated with extraterrestrial beings. He questions the accountability of the Pentagon, which has failed audits and lacks transparency regarding its spending. Burchitt believes that the reluctance to disclose information stems from corruption and the desire to maintain control over advanced technologies that could disrupt military interests. He emphasizes the need for honest answers and transparency regarding UFOs and government actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Earlier this year, congress passed something called the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023. The law requires the US government to tell the public what it knows about the countless unidentified flying objects that have been spotted in the skies above earth over the past 3000 years. It's designed to be and it very well could be a transformative piece of legislation, and it comes at a time when we can finally say with confidence that the most unlikely sounding theories about UFOs are actually true. Yes. These things are real.
They're not all weather balloons. They're not experimental aircraft from this or any other country. Whatever they are, they are not of human origin, nor do they nor do they behave according to the laws of known physics. And, yes, the US government currently has physical evidence that they exist. That means wreckage of the craft as well as the bodies of the beings that flew them.
Amazingly, all of this is true. We know that from the detailed testimony, much of it under oath, from several high level whistleblowers, including longtime intel officers, Lou Elizondo and Dave Grush, both of whom we've talked to. But there have been many, about 10 so far. So the question is, now that the UAP disclosure act has passed, when can the rest of us see the information that we paid for and in fact own? Well, not so fast, it turns out.
One of the great secrets of Washington known to everyone inside Washington is that many of the most powerful members of congress do not work for their constituents, much less for the rest of us, for the country at large. They are instead puppets of the most secretive federal agencies. They are controlled effectively by the permanent bureaucracy, including through bribery and blackmail. 2 such members happen to be especially powerful this term. They are congressman Mike Rogers of Alabama, who is the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and congressman Mike Turner of Ohio, who is chairman of the House Intel Committee.
Both of these men have been instructed to violate, in letter and in spirit, federal law and to hide the truth about UFOs from the American public. They're working to do that right now. It is infuriating to watch this. But if you think about it for a second, it's also baffling. Why is this happening?
Federal agencies have been lying about UFOs for more than 80 years. This has been a coordinated effort. It is both highly time consuming and very expensive. Many Americans have been hurt in the process. But why?
What's the point of this? Would it be a lot easier just to release the facts? Now the conventional explanation for why they haven't been released is that the US government is lying about UFOs because the truth about UFOs is too scary to reveal, that they're real, and our leaders wouldn't wanna panic the population. But that's not true. In fact, it's ridiculous.
Wouldn't wanna terrify the population? Terrifying the population is what our government does best and most avidly. Officials regularly gin up irrational fears about COVID or white supremacy or Vladimir Putin or a dozen other topics as part of a pretty obvious control strategy. It's not like these people mind scaring you. They want to scare you, and they do it every day.
So why would they lie about UFOs? Well, because they're covering up a crime, obviously, and it's their crime. Someday, we'll discover what that crime is. But in the meantime, here are a few questions that honest lawmakers ought to be asking. Have government agencies used tax dollars to procure advanced nonhuman technology?
If they have, where exactly is that technology now? Has it been used for profit? How exactly has the American public benefited from that technology? And then this question, the most pressing of all, has the US government communicated directly with the beings that piloted these craft? Have American officials ever entered into any sort of agreement with them?
And if so, what are the terms of that agreement? These are not random questions. They are informed questions. And at this point, Americans have a moral right to know the answers. One member of congress who might be willing to ask those questions is congressman Tim Burchitt.
He's a Republican from Knoxville. Burchitt is one of the very few lawmakers in Washington who seems genuinely outraged by the cover up in progress. Here he is the other day responding to it.
Speaker 1: And I was told by leadership that it was blocked by the intelligence community, not the intelligence committee, but the intelligence community. And that is a very chilling effect. If you if you someone can reach through the veil of government and pierce it to the point of we do not have access to something, you gotta start asking yourself who the hell's in control. And and I think it'd be wise for you all to start looking at some financial disclosures of some of those corporations, some of the people who do the stonewalling in this town. Now I want you to think about this.
Think about this, that something with the capabilities of traveling light years, not showing, a heat signature, and the energy capabilities of that, that would put the Pentagon out of business. We wouldn't be fighting these worthless wars overseas over oil, and American boys and girls wouldn't be dying. It would put the war pigs out of business, and they'd have to go somewhere else. And I'm all for that.
Speaker 0: Congressman Tim Burchard of Tennessee joins us now. Congressman, thanks so much for coming on. So I I think a lot of that clip speaks for itself, but you you were saying effectively, as I hear you, if unelected bureaucrats and defense contractors can shut down a federal law, then it's not really a democracy then, is it?
Speaker 1: No. It's not. And you're correct. They have been able to do that through their power and influence.
Speaker 0: What I'm really struck. There is some pushback against this. I I think you've been the most visible and by far the most articulate, but there are some people who are bothered by this. But I've heard almost no discussion about why it's happening in the first place. Why the effort, the enormous effort to suborn the members of congress, the committee chairman I mentioned, and the new speaker of the house, and the senate majority leader, minority leader rather?
Why? Why go to the effort to hide information that most Americans think they already know and have accepted?
Speaker 1: I think it's power, influence, corruption, money, all the things, you know, that run Washington. Our Pentagon just recently, failed their 6th audit in a row. They they publicly disclosed that over half their assets are unaccounted for. Now those assets are, you know, their automobiles, their firearms, their, I guess, personnel, everything. 50%.
Could you imagine, anything else? And yet we've rewarded them with 1,000,000,000 more this year for their incredible effort, and they and they're bragging about how well they're doing now. And so you figure, you know, a compartmentalized department like the Pentagon, who has these untold $1,000,000,000 contracts with our defense contractors who want us in every war, who want us in Ukraine, who want us in everything everywhere in the world. And, and and because they'll be selling more missile defense systems and things like that, You you imagine that though there's probably, I would say, a half a dozen of those top level contractors and, these corporations, multinational, and then we fund them. And we don't know where the money is going and yet there's cost overruns and we keep rewarding them with more.
So, obviously, if they were in in possession of some of this material or a a craft or what have you, the reverse engineering possibilities would be unlimited. And and they don't wanna you know, they they just they can control the ebbs and flows of technology, and they're on the cutting edge of it. And they don't want us out of war because of and imagine too, as I've stated before, if you had this energy source that didn't show a heat trail that could heat our homes, cool our homes in the summer, heat our homes in the winter, I mean, we'd be out of the Pentagon will be out of business. I like call I think I call them war pigs, but I meant to say war pimps, I believe is the the appropriate term.
Speaker 0: I I I think but I think both fit.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I do too. I get a lot of I get a lot of controversy. I I had a call from a high ranking official told me one time that I probably need to get bodies around me pretty soon after making those statements. And I I said, well, I'm in tennis I live in Tennessee.
You don't you anybody's out of place there, they'll they'll know it pretty quick. But but all in all truthfulness, these groups, you know, and they and they own these politicians, you know, whether through the honeypot or just, hiring family members or what have you. And I don't have any firsthand knowledge of of that going on with any of those. I but but that seems to be what's done in the past and it's all done legally, most of it is now. And so you've got you've got these situations and and they don't wanna change it and they've got somebody's ear.
I had an old time lobbyist. He was they called him the golden goose when I was in the state legislature. He was the liquor lobbyist and he'd smoke that big cigar and he'd he'd say, Birchett, he said, I don't need I don't need the governor. I don't need the house, the senate. I just need 1 committee chairman.
And Yeah. You know, and that's the way it works. And, unfortunately, we allow it to work when less than 20% of the population goes to the polls.
Speaker 0: The the stakes in this particular story seem pretty high since the government has evidence that we're not alone in the universe, that there is some form of intelligent life or something that is creating these crafts. They're buzzing the earth. We don't know if they're from outer space, if they're spiritual beings. I mean, we we just don't know the answer, but the government does know, but they're lying about it because why? And so does it occur that maybe the the billions of unaccounted Pentagon funds that you mentioned that turn up in every, accounting process, then maybe that they're not lost through incompetence.
Maybe those are attached to programs that we're not allowed to know about.
Speaker 1: I completely think it's intentional, Tucker. You're exactly right as usual. You know, they've been lying about it since 1947. And then all of a sudden, we're gonna pass legislation, and they're gonna say, oh, we're gonna come out and tell you the truth. I mean, this, you know, Schumer's thing, everybody's on me because I'm not really sure about the the Schumer amendment because it it it basically is modeled after the, the Kennedy assassination, files and the real and here we are 60 years later, and we haven't done that.
I I guess it's a good step forward, but the reality is we're gonna tell them to tell us the truth after they've been lying to us, and they've been funding this program. Lou Alizondo, for instance, is the program that he was involved with for for the longest period of time. They said it didn't exist, yet he shows up. He's got a department that works for him. And so, you know, this thing has just been going on, like I said, at least since 1947, and we know it's been going on maybe before then at some point.
It's it's a worldwide phenomena. We have we have some of the best pilots not not in East Tennessee, the best pilots in the world that are telling me their crafts have been buzzed by this. You know? And I've had I've had members of congress say, Virgiet, you know, we need to be on something important. Well, let me ask you.
What's more important than something in our airspace buzzing $50, $60,000,000 aircraft, putting American pilots at risk, and that we don't know who it is or what it is. And then we have a government that claims they don't exist. And now all of a sudden, people like yourself have brought this issue to the forefront. Over half the American public believes that they're out there. And now the Pentagon is it smells dollars is what I think it is.
That's why they're they're putting all this out. In each department, NASA and everybody else has their little pamphlets out now of of, you know, NASA's. I think it said something about we want do robust research. Well, you know what robust research means. They wanna they want more of your tax dollars.
I just want them to come for come forward with the with the truthful information that they've been hiding from us for decades.
Speaker 0: Do we possess this technology or don't we? And if we do, where is it? And there have been, as noted earlier, a number of pretty ominous indications over the years from apparently informed people that the US government has been in direct contact with these forces, whatever they are, the people who created and flew these objects, whatever they are. But there has been direct dialogue, between the US government, maybe other governments, and these entities. Are you aware of that?
Has anyone even asked that question to say the president of the United States or someone else who could answer it.
Speaker 1: I'm aware of it, and I've talked to people about it, but it's it's just another rabbit hole I go down. And I have to be real careful, Tucker, to be honest with you because you would not believe the amount of research and things I've gotten poured on me from all over the world. People send me books and and photographs and things. And of course, a lot of that is I think it's it's fake, because they're trying to get me to embarrass me further, I guess, in this issue, but I'm I'm not biting on all of it. I don't usually put any of it out, actually, just because, you know, I don't know if any of it's if it's truthful or if it's it's a government entity putting this garbage out to, to, discredit, you know, this community or what have you.
But it's a it's a complete, it's it's just it shows the the mistrust the public has of our government and and for good reason.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's been well earned. So where is this legislation going? I mean, will there be disclosure short term? Will these 2 committee chairmen, the speaker of the house, Mitch McConnell, will they shut it down?
Speaker 1: Well, the senate passed it, the amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, but it hasn't been signed into law yet. The house is in negotiations from what I understand over this amendment. I'll be talking to the speaker today or tomorrow about this amendment and just telling him how important it is to this community and and, transparency. That that's really all I want is transparency. Where we're we're spending all this money on something and where is it going and why do they not trust the American public?
Those are the things that people need to ask. You can you know, as I said at the at the hearing, I said we're not gonna bring in a UFO. We're not gonna bring in little green men, but what we want is transparency. And an and, unfortunately, we don't have much of that in United States Congress because they'll oh, look. There's another shiny object over here.
They'll misdirect us over here. They'll misdirect us over there. But I believe this community is very, very in tune to what's going on and the cover up that's been going on.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, if this if this is real, and it it clearly is real, 10 people have come forward with security clearances to say, yes, it's real.
Speaker 1: Well, the the the interesting thing about that was you said 10 and that kinda jogged my memory. We asked more than 10 people to to testify before our committee, and several of them were scared off. They were told by, the their overlords or whoever at the Pentagon that, no, they could not come speak. And then the 3 that we got were dynamite, obviously, because that really lit the fuse. But but there's several more out there and several more have come forward.
I was sent a text just was as I was in here getting ready to come on your show from somebody else. But, again, I have to be real careful with those because they get up there and embarrass the whole community, then we're we're 2 steps back.
Speaker 0: No. That's exactly right. And I and I think they've salted disinformation lies, throughout, this story, in order to discredit the people, who tell it. Last question. What you come out with a statement that we played at the beginning of this interview.
Pretty compelling. Kinda hard to see what the counterargument is. What are your fellow members of congress say to you about that, and what is the excuse that they give you to your face for not disclosing this information to the public?
Speaker 1: Well, as I've stated many times, there's several members have come forward to me. Some of them fairly prominent in both parties that have actually seen something as a child or in the military or other things. I think now that the the their phone lines have been lit up because the UFO community, if one thing, they are relentless, and they call and they're informed. And they'll they call and and, and some of them actually, you know, they've they've called my office in support of me, and I always tell them, you know, I appreciate it, but I'm good. Y'all need to get on with the with your own congressman or your senators.
And so they've they've made a great they've great made a great effort of that. And I believe now, at congress, even if they don't believe it, they're gonna start looking into it because they know this public this this group is is is well well versed. And I'm and I'm glad of it because, you know, the thing that happened to me was they, they started this stuff and and and sure enough, I get home and and somebody's running a running a pole against me to figure out my weaknesses. And who do you think is doing that? So, you know, and and I fully expect this to be an issue on the ballot next time.
I mean, me being on the ballot as well, that that would be, you know, they're gonna be running that against me. But I don't I don't think they're gonna get anywhere with it because I think they're, you know, they're still driving around in their 72 Vegas and their blue leisure suits with their zip up dingo boots listening to an 8 track tape player. I think they're they're a little bit behind the times right now.
Speaker 0: Who do who do you think just I'm interested. Who do you who do you think did that? Who do you think is coming after your seat for your willingness to talk about this?
Speaker 1: I think it's probably 1 of 3 people. You know, you I don't know. Maybe any of those people that you mentioned, and there's some that that that there's others too. I mean, you figure they've got unlimited funds, And that that's what scares me about the whole thing. They have unlimited funds where they could literally buy a seat in congress, which I know that's that'd be naive of me to think that that's never happened in the past.
But but, in Tennessee, we we are fairly independent people and it and it and that that bothers me a great deal.
Speaker 0: Well, it's just interesting, I mean, that they're willing to go to that effort. You think they say, you know, oh, Birchen, he's crazy. He believes in UFOs. But they're very threatened by this, which tells you that they've got something to hide that implicates them. That's that's what I'm learning.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. They're threatened because people like Tucker Carlson are adding a air of legitimacy to this thing, and they and they know that every millions of viewers that you have are watching this and they're scratching their head. And then and then they're going home to their barbershops and some guy who's who's in the navy who was on an aircraft carrier and was and saw something and was told by, when they got back to port that some men in some suits said, hey, you didn't see anything. This is national security. You ever bring this up, you're going to the federal penitentiary and break rocks for the rest of your life.
You know, those stories are coming out daily, and it's and it's happening more and more. And so I think they're they're they're taking a step back now. Well, I
Speaker 0: appreciate your bravery very much, congressman Tim Burchard of Knoxville, Tennessee. Great to see you. Thank you very much.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Tucker. It's been a great honor. Thank you, brother.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Just in: 🚨 New video shows the moment the attacker in New Orleans plowed through a packed Bourbon Street from Canal street: https://t.co/5igFcB3fc3
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I can't believe this is real! Trump is saying that any teacher or official who tells a child they might be in the wrong body will face serious consequences, including civil rights violations. He wants to promote traditional family roles and ban men from women's sports.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Someone pinch me, I must be dreaming!! 🙌🙌 Trump: any teacher or official suggests to a child that they were trapped in the wrong body they will face severe consequences, civil rights violations for sex discrimination and elimination of federal funding....We will promote the nuclear family and roles of mothers & fathers. We will prohibit men from participating in women's sports.
Video Transcript AI Summary
My Department of Education will inform states and school districts that teachers suggesting a child could be trapped in the wrong body will face severe consequences, including civil rights violations and loss of federal funding. We will promote education about the nuclear family and the unique roles of mothers and fathers. I will ask Congress to pass a bill recognizing only male and female genders assigned at birth, ensuring Title IX prohibits men from participating in women's sports. Parents will have the right to consent before their minor child assumes a new gender identity. No serious country should tell children they were born with the wrong gender, a concept that is recent and radical. Under my leadership, this will end. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My Department of Education will inform states and school districts that if any teacher or school official suggests to a child that they could be trapped in the wrong body, they will be faced with severe consequences, including potential civil rights violations for sex discrimination and the elimination of federal funding. As part of our new credentialing body for teachers, we will promote positive education about the nuclear family, the roles of mothers and fathers, and celebrating rather than erasing the things that make men and women different and unique. I will ask congress to pass a bill establishing that the only genders recognized by the United States government are male and female, and they are assigned at birth. The bill will also make clear that title 9 prohibits men from participating in women's sports, and we will protect the rights of parents from being forced to allow their minor child to assume a gender which is new and an identity without the parents' consent. The identity will not be new, and it will not be without parental consent.
No serious country should be telling its children that they were born with the wrong gender, a concept that was never heard of in all of human history. Nobody's ever heard of this, what's happening today. It was all when the radical left invented it just a few years ago. Under my leadership, this madness will end. Thank you very much.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
In March 2024, I learned that Kamala Harris and Doug Emhoff alerted Sean “Diddy” Combs about an impending Homeland Security raid, for which Combs paid Emhoff $500,000. A former lawyer from Emhoff's time at DLA Piper leaked this information. Diddy reportedly destroyed documents implicating others in his criminal activities, which Harris had a personal interest in. Both Diddy and Emhoff are connected through their involvement in the entertainment industry, which has seen its share of scandals and criminal behavior.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
In March, 2024 Kamala Harris and Doug Emhoff tipped Sean “Diddy” Combs off on an upcoming Homeland Security raid. Combs has paid Emhoff $500,000 for this information. The story was leaked by a lawyer who previously worked with Emhoff at DLA Piper Diddy destroyed some documents pointing at people involved in his criminal activities, Harris had personal interest in destroying these documents. Diddy and Emhoff come from the same crowd of entertainment industry workers involved in scandals and criminal activities.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Dramatization of the conversation - Voices altered and faces blurred: https://t.co/KSvhr15ce1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Things aren't looking good for Combs, who is currently in jail in New York with increasing charges and witnesses against him. While a significant amount of incriminating material was seized, he managed to destroy some documents before investigators could access them. Interestingly, just hours before the raids, Doug Emhoff tipped off Combs about them, likely through his connection with Kamala Harris. Emhoff, a California lawyer, had prior relationships with many in the entertainment industry. Combs' lawyer reportedly paid Emhoff $500,000 for this information. The destroyed documents contained names of powerful individuals involved in Combs' illegal activities, many of whom support Harris. However, Combs couldn't destroy all evidence in time due to the number of properties he owns and attempted to enlist his children’s help in Los Angeles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Honestly, things don't look too great, Combs. He's behind bars in New York. More and more witnesses and charges against him are appearing. I in addition to those that the investigators already have. Now it'd have been worse.
Oh. Well, lots of porn was seized during searches in March, but he's managed to destroy some documents. A bunch of incriminating material never fell into the hands of investigators.
Speaker 1: How exactly did he find out about the upcoming raids?
Speaker 0: Well, that's the interesting part. A few hours before the raids, he was called by Doug Emhoff himself. He tipped columns off on the time of the raids and in which houses they'll be conducted.
Speaker 1: So Emhoffin, did he know each other?
Speaker 0: What do you think? A California lawyer who worked on intellectual property cases for years and a Hollywood celebrity producer. They're almost from the same crowd. When I met Emhoff at DLA Piper, he already knew lots of producers, label owners, and celebrity lawyers.
Speaker 1: How did Emhoff learn about the Reeds then?
Speaker 0: From his wife, Kamala, of course. And then he called Combs' lawyer.
Speaker 1: Even if they know Combs, why would Harris and Amhof jeopardize themselves this much?
Speaker 0: 1st, money. Holmes' lawyer paid Emhoff half a $1,000,000 for that favor. 2nd, because of the documents Holmes destroyed, there is entire list of people involved in his illegal activities. We're talking real Epstein flight list tier stuff. Very powerful people, all supporters of Harris.
Speaker 1: Then why hasn't Kalms destroyed all of the evidence?
Speaker 0: Well, with all those houses in different states, he just didn't have enough time. He even tried to call his children so they'd help him in LA, but time was short.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The conversation begins with a comment about Elton John's appearance. A humorous remark follows, suggesting his long career has taken a toll. Another participant proposes that John should write a song about his experiences. They collaboratively create lyrics titled "The Longest Ride," reflecting on life and love over the decades. A suggestion arises to use AI to make the lyrics sound like an Elton John song, leading to a shared audio link. Participants express amusement at the catchy chorus, highlighting the effectiveness of AI in this creative endeavor.
@MrpolSciGuy - Mr. Pol Sci Guy
@Alphafox78 Getting pounded in the ass for 70 years does that to man.
@KeenHisAndHers - Her Majesty The Keen
@MrpolSciGuy @Alphafox78 He needs to write a song about that.
@MrpolSciGuy - Mr. Pol Sci Guy
**Title: "The Longest Ride"** (Verse 1) I've been around for seven decades, my life’s an open book, From the time I was young, to the old I now look. I've seen the world change, in more ways than one, But there's one constant truth, not easily undone. (Chorus) Pounded in the ass for seventy years, Through laughter and tears, battles and cheers. Life's not just about the journey, but how you feel, When you've been pounded in the ass, you know it's real. (Verse 2) Met my love back in '54, he gave me more than just a name, Together we've danced through life, in the sunshine and the rain. From the quiet whispers to the loudest cries, We've shared what many dare not, 'neath the same skies. (Chorus) Pounded in the ass for seventy years, Through all of the fears, the joys and the jeers. It's not about the fall, it’s about the rise, Pounded in the ass, but I've found my prize. (Bridge) Age ain't nothing but a number, they say, But the memories, oh, they never fade away. Each year a testament, to how we've lived, With every pound, we've learned to forgive. (Verse 3) Now I sit here, rocking by the fire, The flames dance like our past, full of desire. Every wrinkle tells a story, every laugh a tale, Of a life well-lived, where love didn't fail. (Chorus) Pounded in the ass for seventy years, Through doubts and cheers, pains and peers. Here's to the life that's been nothing less, Than being pounded in the ass, and still feeling blessed. (Outro) So here's my song, take it with a grain, Of humor and love, through loss and gain. Life's what you make it, so let's raise a glass, To being pounded in the ass, but forever class.
@JeffreyFie62667 - Jeffrey Field
@MrpolSciGuy @KeenHisAndHers @Alphafox78 Can that be put through AI and made to sound like an Elton John song?
@MrpolSciGuy - Mr. Pol Sci Guy
@JeffreyFie62667 @KeenHisAndHers @Alphafox78 Here you go. https://lalals.s3.amazonaws.com/projects/d95e2372-7ddb-4f85-bf07-6ce97cb23354.wav
@KeenHisAndHers - Her Majesty The Keen
@MrpolSciGuy @JeffreyFie62667 @Alphafox78 The cadence of the ass pounding chorus is perfect. Lol
@MrpolSciGuy - Mr. Pol Sci Guy
@KeenHisAndHers @JeffreyFie62667 @Alphafox78 AI is amazing
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
HOA members are upset that a man carried on with his life as normal during a power outage using his generator: 🤦♂️😆 https://t.co/NvFilUjQnx
Video Transcript AI Summary
A homeowner received a noise complaint from their non-HOA neighborhood after using a gas-powered generator during a town-wide power outage. HOA members complained about excessive noise from the generator, which they found disruptive and aggravating.
Additionally, neighbors expressed frustration and perceived unfairness because the homeowner was seen watching TV and maintaining normalcy while others were without power. The HOA deemed this inconsiderate.
The HOA requests the homeowner to consider a quieter generator and be mindful of neighbors in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the power went out a couple days ago, and long and behold, this showed up the very next day. Subject, noise complaint regarding generator used during recent power outage. Dear non HOA homeowner, we are writing in response to several complaints received from HOA members regarding the recent power outage that affected the entire town. While we understand the challenges of a blackout, your actions during this time have raised concerns among the community. During the outage, you utilized a gas power backup generator to restore power to your home.
While backup generators are not prohibited, the following issues were raised. Excessive noise. Multiple HOA members reported that your generator was loud and disruptive, causing undue disturbance the neighborhood. Such noise during an already stressful situation aggravated the discomfort for those without power. Oh, dear.
Perceived unfairness. Several HOM members were frustrated by the fact that while the rest of the community was without power, you were seen watching the game on your TV and carrying on as normal. The disparity caused further dissatisfaction among residents who felt the noise and visible signs of your power at home were inconsiderate during the outage. Okay. We kindly ask that you take the following actions in the future.
Consider a quieter alternative. If possible, invest in a quieter or more discreet generator system to reduce the noise impact on your neighbors. Be mindful of your neighbors. While using your generator, consider
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Try this neat trick next time you get pulled over, works every time, 60% of the time! https://t.co/0cnRd4vbn0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Officer: Sorry for speeding. Name? Frida. Officer: You're free to go. Thank you. Confused response: What?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Officer, I'm sorry. I know I was speeding. First name? Frida. Last name?
Go, ma'am. You're free to go, ma'am? Thank you so much. Have a great day. What?
What? What?
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Kevin Bacon is dead to me. https://t.co/OixaN8ALlU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Drag is an ancient art form that allows for creativity and self-expression. 6 Degrees is supporting the ACLU Drag Defense Fund to amplify voices facing injustice. You can help by shopping our bonfire campaign or making a donation. Designed by Mason Kaye, Kira and I are proud to support this cause and encourage you to do the same.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Drag is an art and drag is a right. Drag is a centuries old art form of creativity, expression, and self exploration. It's an opportunity to educate through entertainment, and it's not dangerous. At 6 Degrees, we believe in amplifying the voices of those that are experiencing injustice. So join us in supporting the ACLU Drag Defense Fund by shopping our bonfire campaign or making a gift.
Designed by the amazing Mason Kaye, Kira and I are honored to support this important fund, and we welcome you to do the same.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Taylor shakes her head NO when someone thanks God for their career: 🤔 https://t.co/mR8WVBxTCJ
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Interesting.. 🤔 https://t.co/vckUUNKp50
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mary Mahoney, a former Clinton White House intern, was killed in 1997. Vince Foster, a White House counsel, was found dead in 1993. James McDougall, a key witness, died before testifying in 1998. Seth Rich, a DNC staffer, was shot and killed in 2016. Shawn Lucas, an attorney, was found dead in 2016. These deaths have raised speculation about foul play and potential connections to political events, but official reports have not confirmed any wrongdoing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator. Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials. She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997. In 1993, White House counsel Vince Foster, was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC.
He supposedly killed himself, and among a lengthy list potential foul play, the bullet was never found. Then there's James McDougall, a key witness for White House prosecutors. Old he was serving his 3 year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas. And just before he was to give a testimony before the grand jury, McDougal his body was found at the bottom of a river, nearly 2 miles from the base of the trail he was reportedly hiking. An autopsy determined that Shibe's death electrical accidental drowning, but he might have known too much.
27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer, Seth Rich, was shot and killed in DC this year. There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked e mails allegedly sent by D and C staffers, and that he may have been murdered in retaliation. Then Shawn Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DC, was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when he returned home on August 2nd. His death was reported classified pending the results of
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Happy Monday! Here is a cheerful song to start off your week! https://t.co/HLWWSyPR21
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video sing a satirical song about the government's role in society. They humorously mention how the government can take people's money, tax various things, and provide bailouts. They criticize the government's handling of issues like healthcare, climate change, and pollution. The speakers also mock the idea of the government giving itself raises instead of facing consequences for failures. Despite the criticism, they express a positive view of the government, claiming it stands out and makes them feel good. The video ends with a mention of choreography and a final affirmation of the government's presence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who can take your money? With a twinkle in their eye. Take it all away and give it
Speaker 1: to some other guy. The government. The government can.
Speaker 0: And who can tax the sunrise? Who can tax the trees?
Speaker 1: We'll let you run a business and collect up all the fees. The government. No. The government can. The can.
And the government can't because they mix it up with eyes and make it all taste good.
Speaker 0: Like health care, climate change,
Speaker 1: pollution. Just throw away the constitution. I wrote that. Thank you. Back.
Speaker 0: Who can give a bailout? Tell us to behave.
Speaker 1: And make the founding fathers roll over, and they're great. They're good. I don't care if you hate me. I'm gonna sing it anyway.
Speaker 0: Yummy, yummy. We've got what it takes. Everything we make, they're all power hungry and delicious. Their economics are fictitious. Soon we'll have to eat our as you come.
How's that taste, kids? It can be a failure in so many ways. To booty. And instead of getting fired, hey, we'll give ourself a raise. Kentucky, you know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: I did the choreography myself.
Speaker 0: And I feel so good
Speaker 1: because the government stands out for sure.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Guess who funded Media Matters? George Soros: https://t.co/xJ0UFmmpAb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Media Matters For America was founded in 2004 to address perceived bias in the media favoring Republicans. It received initial funding from John Podesta, who was involved in Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and advised the Clintons. The organization's creation was motivated by the belief that the media was too slanted and in favor of Republicans. The funding for Media Matters came from George Soros.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For America was created in 2004 because the people who founded Media Matters For America thought that the media was too biased, too in the tank, too slanted on behalf of Republicans. I'm not joking. And it was started with seed money and an umbrella organization started by John Podesta. That's right. That John Podesta, the guy who ran Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and was a consigliere and adviser to the Clintons.
And the money that started the whole thing came from, say it with me, George Soros.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Make sure you teach your kids morals so they don’t end up like this: https://t.co/GSA0jDEVb4
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Recently discovered MiniDV camcorder footage captures the heartbreaking moment of the twin towers' explosion on 9/11. Surprisingly, no plane is visible in the footage, leading to speculation of its possible concealment behind the tower. Witnesses recording the event also claimed the absence of a plane. Tragically, the video reveals people falling from the buildings.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Recently found MiniDV camcorder footage on 911 of the twin towers. This video shows the moment when the towers exploded. There was no plane in this footage (was it hidden behind the tower?) and even the people who were recording and seeing it were saying there was no plane. You can see people falling from the buildings, it's truly heartbreaking.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two speakers witness the events of the World Trade Center attack. They initially mistake the sound for thunder but soon realize it's an explosion. They see smoke and debris falling from the building and witness people jumping to their deaths. They discuss the possibility of a bomb and question how the second building exploded. They express fear and shock at the scene unfolding before them. The speakers capture the horrifying moments on film and describe it as the scariest and most ridiculous moment of their lives. They mention the suction force and the glass breaking as they try to escape the building. They conclude that the second building was definitely bombed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh my god.
Speaker 1: Homes.
Speaker 0: Paper everywhere.
Speaker 1: Right there. That'll be. Is it? Holy shit.
Speaker 0: It's crazy.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I guess, sir. I'm trying like a beat dog. Let's get you a walkman. Hello?
Ben? It's off the window.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Rich, There's a bomb. It just went off from the World Trade Center.
Speaker 1: What's the airplane?
Speaker 0: Airplane saw? Airplane passenger. I heard, like, a speaking. Where are you? Oh, wow.
I'm on the roof. Yeah. Alright. Bye. I'm using.
Speaker 1: You saw how do you
Speaker 0: know it was an airplane?
Speaker 1: Like, I was, like, flipping. Right? And I heard, like, a big, different trench.
Speaker 0: I saw things falling from my window, but
Speaker 1: I didn't know it was nothing. What? I didn't know it was nothing. It sounded like that. No.
It's never. It's never again.
Speaker 0: Channel 1 is set to I
Speaker 1: heard. It heard.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: It can't be a month in a moment. You've got
Speaker 0: How could a plane crash in the world to turn midmorning?
Speaker 1: Looking, obviously, it's zero.
Speaker 0: It planes can't find that low. It would have hit, like It's Sam. April.
Speaker 1: And, no. No. They're not sure what it is. It's Sam. It might
Speaker 0: It's fucking I don't know. I heard the crash. I looked out my window, and I could see things falling down the building. And I couldn't tell what it was. I was, like, hanging out my window looking.
This is before.
Speaker 1: It's a nice person right there for that. Good. There's no no no no no.
Speaker 0: K. Grab this piece Paper right here.
Speaker 1: Holy shit.
Speaker 0: I see the 5 I need to generate a plane for fitness in the morning. That's way too low for a plane to be flying and, like Good morning.
Speaker 1: It actually turned me. Oh, shit. It's starting
Speaker 0: to burn Yeah. This is burning. There's some service system
Speaker 1: There's I was on my window. I said people running that way. I was like, come on. Well, you heard it? Yeah.
Why is it? Just a lower Yeah.
Speaker 0: That fire is in the whole That was louder than a fucking truck.
Speaker 1: That was really loud. Truck of both of some I think we're good. I'm I think I got it up. I thought it was construction going on. I was
Speaker 0: like, that is Way too loud for fucking construction.
Speaker 1: Someone is wondering about the
Speaker 0: TV? No. I just I looked out my window. I saw I saw smoke, and I saw something falling. And I was like, Oh my god.
It was a bomb. I I don't know if it's a bomb at least.
Speaker 1: That's the first See the
Speaker 0: fire spread? It's like you know, that Hold top is on fire. You see how, like, up really high this window is giving smoke? No. It's like that's like 25 floors There's 25 floors out of that.
You see the fire in the the center right there? See
Speaker 1: It's It's
Speaker 0: 8:8:45 in the morning.
Speaker 1: Okay. Oh, shit. How's your number? I heard something. I heard something.
I heard I thought it was thundering. Hey. Hey. Oh, shit. Thanks.
Speaker 0: What are they gonna do to get up
Speaker 1: As it went on to the flames, it was just a small city. Yes,
Speaker 0: I thought my neighbor was so excited
Speaker 1: about this. We need
Speaker 0: I wish Shave. I wouldn't say it here now. What's going on? There's the news out there. Wow.
Claire.
Speaker 1: Oh my god. Oh, shit. Hello?
Speaker 0: Oh my god.
Speaker 1: Oh
Speaker 0: Oh my god.
Speaker 1: Oh my god. Holy shit. I just like that.
Speaker 0: Oh my god. Oh my god. Someone just jumped again. There you go. No.
Jumping. I just saw someone jump again. Oh my god. Oh my god. Oh my god.
Speaker 1: There's nothing right there. We got another one. It's Come back on. Come back on. Come back.
The people are jumping out of It's a fucking the had you been
Speaker 0: a fucking vibe because they they they knew everyone would
Speaker 1: be watching. It's fucking sick.
Speaker 0: I can't believe I got that. Oh my God. That scared the oh my god.
Speaker 1: This is 6 It's not something that's gonna happen. It's a also A plane. They said it
Speaker 0: was a plane, and that that building just randomly fucking exploded. It was not a plane. A bit Look. That Side just blew up. It just blew up 2 minutes ago.
Speaker 1: Blew up.
Speaker 0: Way after that one. That is not a plane. They don't know what they're talking about. How would they see a plane hit that? It would be a matter of 2 seconds.
Though.
Speaker 1: I mean, if you hear it before bombing. It was something like gone so slow. That's I've heard of a big truck since
Speaker 0: I Yeah. But then that side exploded. How did that side explode?
Speaker 1: We need drugs from the website. We didn't even know. Oh my god. No. No.
No.
Speaker 0: You were sick. People I've been jumping from the No. No. Don't. People have been jumping off the building like you see them flying down.
Speaker 1: But you're fucking what the
Speaker 0: are you fucking insane? Yo. That's, I got some film. That started blowing up. That started just
Speaker 1: blew up a minute and left. What the fuck? The elevators are probably shutting down.
Speaker 0: Just just Just just no way for them to get up there. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Oh my
Speaker 0: I thought he was a kid in front of it. Shut up. Oh.
Speaker 1: Oh. That's Oh my god. I know somebody
Speaker 0: The person.
Speaker 1: All of them. Oh, god.
Speaker 0: The body is like, let's go. I love you. Let's go. Oh my god.
Speaker 1: I was up there. I'd rather jump out and die to burn.
Speaker 0: Yeah. You you saw that? Yeah. I told you. That'd be
Speaker 1: that'd be the Millennium Tower.
Speaker 0: People are stuck up there.
Speaker 1: No, dude.
Speaker 0: You cannot run out and hit the Millennium towel. Okay? You're not flash boarding. You can't do it. Everything's burning.
What?
Speaker 1: Go again. Do you
Speaker 0: know what you're saying to me?
Speaker 1: What the fuck is that?
Speaker 0: No Big deal. Just running out. Just shut the fuck up. It's just stupid. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. What's the people on the 23rd floor or the 46th? That's, like, a 100.
Speaker 0: It's 8:45 in the morning. Those officers are on call. Dude, this one is
Speaker 1: It has to
Speaker 0: be a bomb. Right? Yes. Of course. That exploded right in front of us.
Speaker 1: All you need is a
Speaker 0: a fucking bomb that's gonna explode at one of the offices, and the whole thing's gonna burn off. After the last bombing, who never thought this happened? How did They put it in the parking lot. This is an office building. You know?
Anyone with a briefcase? I bet that I'm really
Speaker 1: just fucking scared, man. That was a person. Scared. Yeah. You You know what?
They probably back here. They had to back here.
Speaker 0: This person, is
Speaker 1: this son?
Speaker 0: This is how I do.
Speaker 1: Oh my god.
Speaker 0: Is that a person right there? No. He go away.
Speaker 1: He goes straight down. Hey. You got a person right there?
Speaker 0: He person right there. They go straight down No. I
Speaker 1: have it
Speaker 0: on film. The second blew up. The second one blew up.
Speaker 1: It wasn't a blow.
Speaker 0: No. Not at all. The second one blew up.
Speaker 1: It just blew up. It blew up. That's the same. Let me see that again. No.
Speaker 0: There's no way I'm Everyone everyone around me is gonna be like, let me go and see. I would choose to watch that again. It's disgusting.
Speaker 1: I love
Speaker 0: It was fucking scary. It's amazing. It's, like, the most ridiculous moment in my life, seeing the World Trade Center blow up. The scariest thing I might have ever
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm sorry, sir. I'm sorry. I have to hold on to the door. I thought I was torn off the window.
It was a suction. My man's died.
Speaker 0: You were up there?
Speaker 1: I was on 59.
Speaker 0: What happened?
Speaker 1: I don't know what happened. They say this Remember to pull out the whole cast free out the window. How did you get out of the building? Think about the driving force. How'd you get out of the building?
What happened over here? It's a glass pull up. Ocean. Got the glass pull up from the, Oh, wow. Oh,
Speaker 0: What'd you say? People were jumping out at a window. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Over here. I told you. I asked you guys. Watch your back. Watch your back.
Where'd you go? Let me try again.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I don't know how the first one went off, but the second one exploded. There was a bomb on it. Definitely a bomb in second one. I wrote about the first one.
It looks like there's an indent in the building, and maybe there was a plane, but I can't imagine how the second one went off. Then
Speaker 1: the 2 things are answered, but No.
Speaker 0: No. No. I saw that 2nd building blow up. It just blew up. A flat out blew up.
Speaker 1: What are you doing? You want to keep moving? Keep moving. Catch the hit. No.
It was not. It was a bomb. I Saw
Speaker 0: that 2nd building block. It was a bomb. It was 2nd
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
In the education system, the primary goal is to prepare children for productive careers. It's not about counseling or self-discovery. We shouldn't let children lead us. A concerned mother questions why teachers focus on touchy-feely topics.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Based mother asks the teachers board why they are wasting all their time with touchy feely topics: "There is one goal, and one goal alone in the education system: To prepare children to enter careers to be productive members of society. It is not a counceling session, it is not a help self area, it is not a area to find yourself, and we should not be led by the children!"
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration with the focus on self-help and emotional well-being in the educational system. They argue that the main goal should be to prepare children for productive careers and to be successful academically. The speaker believes that children should not be leading the conversation and that adults should make decisions based on statistics and funding. They also mention concerns about mental health issues and argue that children should be allowed to enjoy their innocence and not be burdened with adult problems. The speaker emphasizes the importance of protecting children who have religious beliefs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: God bless this mother. Watch this. I've been coming here for 5 years now, and I was going to talk to you about some practical things that I thought you could change about 3,200 and 10, but I've changed my mind. I've been really confused over the last 5 years you as to why we spend 45 minutes to an hour of every public meeting, talking about how great everyone is and how great everything is in the schools and now I figured it out. I figured it out because all these people came here to defend you all you from hurtful words.
This is obnoxious. Let me just say, there is one goal for the educational system. You. It should be to prepare children to enter careers to be productive members of society. It is not a counseling session.
It is not a self help area. It is not somewhere to find yourself and we should not be led by the children for goodness sake. You. The children are called dependents for a reason. They depend on us who have fully developed brains.
You cannot feel your way through life. The issues that we are talking about, we are bringing you statistics. We are talking about scholastics. We are talking about funding. We are talking about busing.
We are talking about trying to figure out how to make our children be as successful as possible. And I am sure that that is your goal. And what we have been called tonight is what they're claiming that we're saying to children. We're having an adult conversation. You.
There are not children in this room. We aren't going into the schools and calling them names. They call us Marxists and hateful you and bigots and everything else under the sun. Well, let me tell you, less than 5% of the entire population of North Carolina identifies as LGBTQ. You guys all claim you want democracy.
Well, you know what democracy is? It's the majority plus 1. It's 50 plus 1. You know what? You.
More than 50% of the people in this state claim that they believe in God, almighty God, he made us male and female, God who made marriage between a man and a woman, God who said that we must protect our children. The fact that we can stand up here and we know we can brag about all of the wonderful graduations that we know, you. We know the statistics, 50% of children did not pass their end of grade test. What are we celebrating? We have children coming up here telling us you how horrible the mental health crisis is.
Why? Most of us went to public school and all of our all of our peers are not in mental health crises. We have to ask ourselves, what are we doing to our children? I'm going to say, we are discussing things with them that they are not you emotionally, intellectually and morally able to handle. That is what is causing the anxiety.
That is what is causing the depression. You. That is what is causing the confusion. We need our children to be able to be children, to be able to be innocent, to be able to enjoy childhood and not know all of the mom and all of the difficulties in adult life. That is what we want.
We want our children to be able to read and write and to think for themselves. You. And we demand that the children who fear God are protected with this
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Can you read this?
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
HOLY CRAP: Jenny McCarthy and Jim Carrey were based back in the day, what happened??
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1989, 10 shots were given as part of the vaccine schedule. Compared to other Western countries, we give twice as many shots. The question is, do we really need all these vaccines? We should educate ourselves and make informed decisions as parents. We can't assume that those in charge of public health always have our best interests at heart. Some doctors seem hesitant to learn more about vaccines, which can save lives and prevent diseases. It's important to note that the pharmaceutical industry heavily influences medical schools and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Vaccines are a booming business, worth billions of dollars. We need doctors to prioritize prevention and overall health, even if it means taking a financial hit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back in 19 89, the shot schedule was 10 shots given.
Speaker 1: Ten shots given. When I was a kid, what do we get through? It's twice as many as anywhere else in, in 30 countries in the western world. We give twice as many shots as any of those countries. Why is that?
Speaker 0: Well, you should educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chicken pox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the 2nd day of life?
Speaker 1: I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with Our our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time. Parents have to to have to make their own decisions, educated decisions. When the other doctors are here and they will be on the other side in a while after you leave Grab and stab them. That was weren't. This is my nickname.
They say? Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save that could save a life or Prevent a disease. I don't I don't understand. The AAP is financed by the drug companies. Medical school is financed by the drug companies.
This is a huge business. Vaccine vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry. $13,000,000,000.
Speaker 0: They control medical Schools. I mean, they're these doctors are not learning about prevention or vitamins or diets.
Speaker 1: What we are asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children. That's a tough sell in a boardroom.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
They were aware that some common medicines could effectively address the issue as they had conducted prior research on it. They chose to withhold this knowledge from the public, opting instead for solitaire containment, and authoritarianism.
Video Transcript AI Summary
North American science spent 15 years researching how to respond to a potential coronavirus pandemic after the original SARS CoV-one outbreak in 2002-2003. By 2015-2016, it was known that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were effective antiviral and immune modulatory treatments. DARPA, the American Research Arm of the U.S. Military, recommended Ivermectin to the CDC as the top product to use in a coronavirus pandemic. These medications had been proven safe for humans and had been used for several decades. So, when the next pandemic hit, North America had Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine ready for use.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Important thing to realize is that North American science spent 15 years figuring out what to do with the next COVID. It was back 2002, 2003 the original SARS CoV-one occurred and so all sorts of experiments went on to determine what would be a useful response were something similar to occur. And the research was done. It was research was all done by 2015, 2016. Dean.
And DARPA, DARPA, the American Research Arm of the U. S. Military, it specifically knew and specifically recommended and passed the information on to the CDC that Ivermectin, in particular, was the absolute number one product to be used in the event of a coronavirus pandemic. It was fully known that Ivermectin and certainly hydroxychloroquine as well were highly antiviral and immune modulatory, and those 2 things were the key, to modulate the immune response plus to the antiviral as well. Those elements were both totally proven in vitro and in vivo with animals so that it was known and of course, we knew it was completely safe for humans because these medications have been used for 35 to 40 years in humans, and so that's what was sitting there ready to be used at the next pandemic.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The ADL's 90's scandal involved creating fake groups to justify their existence. With a history of shady tactics and media manipulation, they claim to be for the people but aren't. Should the ADL be held accountable?
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
The ADL was caught in the 90's trying to create fake (insert word) groups so they could swoop in and justify why they were even a thing. This organization has a long history of shady tactics and media manipulation. They claim they are for the people but are actually anything from it. Do you think the ADL should be held accountable for its actions?
Video Transcript AI Summary
In February 1979, there was controversy when James Gutman applied for a permit to lead a Nazi march in Philadelphia. However, it was later revealed that Gutman was actually Mordecai Levy, who had ties to the anti-defamation league and later formed the Jewish defense league. It was suspected that this operation was orchestrated by the ADL to raise funds and justify their existence by creating the perception of anti-Semitism. They would dress a few individuals as Nazis, march them through town, and then use it as an opportunity to ask for donations and maintain their tax-exempt status. This was not a one-time occurrence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many of you may remember in February 1979, there was a big uproar because someone by the name of James Gutman applied for a permit to lead a march of Nazis through downtown Philadelphia. Now eventually, some enterprising reporters did an investigation. You know what they turned up? James Gutman was none other than Mordecai Levy, who worked with the anti defamation league and later split off that to form the terrorist Jewish defense league. This was an operation that was run by the ADL.
They wanted to have a Nazi march in Philadelphia. Why? Because how can they raise money to justify their existence if American Jews don't think there's a lot of anti Semitism. So what better thing to do than to slap swastikas on a couple of people, leave them on a march through town, and then the next day, the ADL comes marching in and says, look, there are Nazis on the street. You need to give us money so we can protect you.
And then on top of that, have a tax exempt status. This was not a onetime operation.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
California under Newsom's policies: highest gas prices, rampant homelessness and drug addiction, extensive welfare recipients, sexualized curriculum in schools, water rationing, growing homeless population, reparations, $700 per gallon gas, gig economy killed, COVID vaccine mandates, single-payer health coverage, teacher strikes, energy shortage, crime wave, abortion funding, COVID state of emergency until 2023, vaccine mandates for school children, blaming Big Oil for high gas prices while ignoring carbon neutrality legislation.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
No, this is not a video game; it's all thanks to Newsoms policies and distain for his own people living in his state. Lets list some of Newsom accomplishments: - California’s highest-in-the-country gas prices - California is home to nearly 1/2 of the country’s homeless drug addicted vagrants - California is home to 1/3 of the country’s welfare recipients - California public school children are exposed and indoctrinated to dangerous sexualized curriculum - Water rationing - Ever growing homeless population - Reparations for descendants of slaves - $7.00-per-gallon-gas - Newsom signed AB 5, killing gig economy - COVID mandatory vaccine bills - Single Payer health coverage - Public school teachers strikes - Government created energy shortage, rolling blackouts - Huge crime wave, thanks to Proposition 47 - Gov. Newsom allocated $200M for abortion travel and care, and legalized infanticide - Newsom’s COVID State of Emergency order from March 2020 until the end of February 2023 - Newsom’s Vaccine mandates for school children, days after opposing one for prison guards - Gov. Newsom’s shakedown of the oil and gas industry, blaming “Big Oil” for California’s highest-in-the-nation gas prices, ignoring the package of “sweeping legislation” signed last September to achieve statewide carbon neutrality as soon as possible, and no later than 2045, by establishing an 85% emissions reduction target, capping oil wells, slowing oil and gas permitting, making it impossible to increase refining capacity, and entirely phasing out oil and gas starting in two years.
Video Transcript AI Summary
As governor, I promise to always lead California in the face of challenges, embracing growth and compassion. Homelessness is a reality, and it's a mistake to expect everyone to be clean and sober. We all need occasional self-medication. It's important to tell the truth, value our diversity, and follow science to protect our planet. Gavin Newsom embodies courage during times of crisis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As your governor, I promise you, whatever challenges come our way, I will always leave the California way. You, growing. I say that's the California way. Thank you so much. Based on compassion.
I mean, if we're gonna be realistic, continue to be homeless here. Common sense. Clean and sober is one of the biggest damn mistakes this country's ever made. We all need to self medicate periodically. Telling the truth.
Telling the truth. Treasuring our diversity. To hit my. Telling the truth, following science, protecting our planet. Gavin Newsom, courage through crisis.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
NM District Attorney Sam Bregman said that he, as with Albuquerque Mayor Tim Keller and Police Chief Harold Medina, would not enforce the ban: “As an officer of the court, I cannot and will not enforce something that is clearly unconstitutional,”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Bernalillo County Sheriff's Office will not enforce the temporary ban on concealed carry and open carry, as it challenges the process and punishes law-abiding citizens. The Sheriff shares a personal story of his brother being a victim of gun violence and questions how he can tell him to put away his firearms for self-defense. Criminals do not follow the law, so this ban only affects law-abiding citizens. The Sheriff also highlights the need to address gun violence and proposes a task force, meetings for early intervention, and a special session to address crime in New Mexico. Collaboration with other law enforcement agencies and officials will continue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me be clear. I hold my standards high, and I do not or never will hedge on what is right. And I take my oath seriously. In reference to concealed carry and open carry, the Bernalillo County Sheriff's Office will not for this segment of the order. While I understand the urgency, the temporary ban challenges the foundations a part of the process.
I'm not sure if you're going to be a part of the Tushin, and that is what I will do. The Governor made it clear in her press conference. She knew we We as law enforcement did not agree with the order. And as a result, this was solely her decision. Other than Then this ban being unconstitutional, here are other reasons why I will not enforce the order.
One, what many forget is I have enough violence here at Verlo for county. I do not want to have political violence towards my deputies or here in Bernalillo County. My job is to keep sure if you're going to be able to do that. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do that. I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do that.
I'm not sure if you're going to be able to do that. This order will not do anything to curb gun violence other than punish law abiding citizens from their constitutional right to self defense. Let me give you a personal story. Last week, as I'm sitting here as the city sheriff, I get a phone call that my brother also was a victim of gun violence last week that many of you do not know. While he and my nephew were sitting in their car, they were shot at and their vehicle was impacted by numerous How can I, as a sheriff, tell him to put his firearms away and not be able to protect himself?
I have a fact for you. Criminals do not follow the law for a public health order. Never seen it. We will never see criminals follow the law. Once again, this only punishes law abiding citizens.
What I also want to address is what we're doing on the gun violence here in Bernalillo County and helping in the State of New Mexico. It is quite irritating for me to see How this 30 day ban completely overshadowed the robust conversations that we had with the Governor and the Office on what we are going to do to curb gun violence and for people to stop being victims. We had arguments, but again, we had solutions. We had an 11 year old that was senselessly killed, but there are also many other numerous victims of gun violence, not just here in No county, but our nation. A couple of things that I will be Asking to do as we get serious.
I will take your questions, but let me tell you what we're gonna do because we do need to not overshadow what we need to do to keep our citizens safe. I will be asking the Crime Reduction Director for our agency, the Bernalillo County Sheriff's Office, to lead a task force of various law enforcement agencies to focus on crimes with firearms. I will have continued meetings for early Intervention to not only adult, but youth offenders. I am respectfully requesting as an elected official to please consider a special session to specifically address crime, not just in Berlio Count me, but for the State of New Mexico. We need to look at solutions to address violent crimes involving juveniles with Firearms, adults with firearms, pretrial release, harsh state penalties for violent crimes, which also involve a firearm.
Collaboration and planning will and continue with the Mayor of Albuquerque, Tim Keller Chief of New Mexico State Police, Troy Weisler Chief of the Albuquerque Police Department, Harold Medina, and District Attorney, Sam Bruegman. I will also be
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
'Definitely secondary explosions' Why would there be more explosions after the plane it?
Video Transcript AI Summary
There were multiple explosions in the lobby of the building. The whole lobby collapsed, and people were trapped inside. There were secondary explosions as well. The speaker witnessed three explosions in total. They were inside the building when the first explosion occurred, and then there were two more. People were trying to escape and help others. The speaker mentions that there may be more explosions, and that anyone in the buildings could be in danger. The situation was chaotic and dangerous, with people trying to help while more explosions occurred.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's an explosion. We're in the lobby. The the the 3rd explosion. The whole lobby collapsed on us.
Speaker 1: What was the bike? What was the bike? Harvey. It's like hell. You don't wanna know.
Speaker 0: The whole building just collapsed on us inside the lobby.
Speaker 1: Is that a secondary explosion? Yes. It was. That was Last time.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Definitely secondary as well. Because we was inside waiting to go upstairs. And on our way upstairs, the whole fucking thing blew. And we just just collapsed and everybody's inside the lobby.
So was there. I don't know about the first one, but I know the second one, it was terrible. Then there was a third one too after that one. There was a plug in
Speaker 1: after that.
Speaker 0: Yes, sir. You Everybody's inside the building. The way you go upstairs, and then you're just you're just letting loose. Everything just letting loose inside the building.
Speaker 1: So what what you told me is that there was Plain or whatever hit the building, then the secondary explosion.
Speaker 0: It was like 3 explosions after that. We came in after the after the fire. We came when the fire was going on We was in the staging area inside the building waiting to go upstairs. Alright. And then the floor exploded.
The whole lobby collapsed on the lobby
Speaker 1: And it's just thank you, ma'am. After that
Speaker 0: Just, ma'am, everybody tried to work their way out. Just trying to help all the brothers get out of the out of the people's chat inside and everything. A problem, baby.
Speaker 1: That is the 2nd building. It came out of the south. Right.
Speaker 0: Right in front of our eyes. It's all night though. It's
Speaker 1: closes. We were in the building for the 3rd one of people lapsed. This is not his drive Bay for another one. People would understand. There may be more.
Anyone in these fucking buildings can blow up.
Speaker 0: This ain't done yet. There's nothing
Speaker 1: what I mean.
Speaker 0: The end of the building is trying to help people and then explode money inside the building.
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Please help me understand what I am looking at:
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
What a lovely neighborhood. https://twitter.com/i/status/1608643167443890180/video/1
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker confronts someone named Monica, accusing her of being involved with the wrong person. They repeat this accusation multiple times, emphasizing that it wasn't them but the other person. The speaker urges Monica to go help their friend who is being attacked, calling her a coward. They question who the speaker is and whose friend they are, and someone else confirms that the speaker is indeed their friend.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sir, nigga, shut your tits up. What the fuck are you doing, Monica? What the fuck you doing, Monica? That's the wrong nigga. That's the wrong nigga.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That's the wrong nigga.
What the fuck you do, Don't Monica? Hey. Hey. That's a wrong nigga. It wasn't me.
It wasn't me. That's that nigga. It wasn't me. It wasn't me. That's What the fuck you do, Don't Monica?
It wasn't me. It wasn't me. Jess that nigga. What the fuck you do, Don't Monica? It wasn't me.
It wasn't me. Guess that nigga. What the fuck you do, though, man? Fuck you. Damn.
Damn. Go let your homie It was this nigga, bro. You better go help your homie. What the fuck you doing, nigga? Well, they're stomping your homie, bro.
You better go help, nigga. You a pussy. Who ain't here? Dude, it's this nigga. That was What the fuck you do, though, Monica?
That was crazy. Hey. Who am I in? Hey. Who friend is?
This you? No. You are not. Bro, you better say that's your boy. You're a son and you're fucking with.
Oh, that's your boy. That's your boy.