TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @craigkellyAFEE

Saved - October 20, 2025 at 8:48 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I watched Trump embarrass Kevin Rudd at a press event; he said he doesn’t know the Australian Ambassador, then cut him off with “I don’t like you either and probably never will.” Rudd should resign and put Australia first.

@craigkellyAFEE - Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

Kevin Rudd has been completely humiliated by President Trump as press gallery breaks out into laugher. First Trump says he doesn’t even know who the Australian Ambassador is, and then as Rudd tries to speak, Trump cuts him off, saying; "I don’t like you either and probably never will" Rudd should resign, he is doing Australia a disservice continuing on as Ambassador. Maybe for just once in his life Rudd might put the interest of Australia ahead of his own.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion opens with Speaker 0 addressing Ki Adi, the president, noting that there is concern in Australia that it has taken nine months to arrange this meeting. The speaker asks whether the president has concerns with the administration’s stance on Palestine, climate change, or the Australian ambassador’s past statements about him. The president responds that he doesn’t know anything about the ambassador; if the ambassador said something bad, perhaps he would like an apology, but he doesn’t know. He asks, “Did an ambassador say something bad about him? Don’t tell me. Don’t Where is he? Is he still working for you?” The president confirms the ambassador is still working for the administration and appears to indicate the ambassador is nearby by saying, “Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. He’s just right there. He’s right.” When asked again about any bad statements, the president or speaker responds with “Give up. Do you said bad?” The exchange culminates with a blunt admission: “Before I took this position, mister president I don’t like you either. Oh, yeah. I don’t. And I and I probably never will.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go ahead, Ki Adi, your president. Mister president Mister president, mister president. Mister president, there's been concern in Australia that it's taken nine months to get this meeting. Have you had any concerns with this administration with the stance on Palestine, climate change, or even things the ambassador said about you in the past, the Australian ambassador? I don't know anything about him. I mean, if he said bad, then maybe he'll like to apologize. I really don't know. Did an ambassador say something bad about him? Don't don't tell me. Don't Where is he? Is he still working for you? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. He's just right there. He's right. Give up. Do you said bad? Before I took this position, mister president I don't like you either. Oh, yeah. I don't. And I and I probably never will. Go ahead.
Saved - November 23, 2024 at 6:13 PM

@craigkellyXXX - Craig Kelly

Just before he passed away, I did this interview with Dr. Zelenko. It was banned by YouTube, Facebook and Twitter - the censorship Industrial complex didn’t want the public to hear what he had to say. https://t.co/fHdbe6SliN

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm in my office in Canberra with Dr. Zelenko, who is in the U.S. He has treated around 7,000 COVID patients and educated many physicians globally. His results show no patient deaths in the last eight months and minimal hospitalizations. He attributes success to early treatment and criticizes government policies that delay care. Zelenko advocates for hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, emphasizing their safety and effectiveness, while expressing concerns about vaccine side effects. He believes the current approach is driven by a desire for control rather than public health. He urges people to take preventative measures, including vitamins and zinc, and to question government narratives. Zelenko warns against vaccinating children, citing a higher risk from the vaccine than from COVID itself. He calls for a grassroots awakening against tyranny, emphasizing the importance of truth and community action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm down here in my office in Parliament House in Canberra at doctor Zelenko. And where are you at the moment? Speaker 1: I'm in, in the United States, on the East Coast. I keep it vague. Speaker 0: Very good. Very good. Yes. For safety reasons. Very good. Okay. Now, doctor Slankow, you you are famous, renowned around the world for your early treatments of COVID. Can you quickly run through us what you recommend about all your early treatments? But before you do, maybe give us some of your your background about how you came across these early treatments and why you recommend them. Speaker 1: Well, my team at the first of all, thank you so much, minister. It's it's really nice to see you again. I think you're like a light in a country of darkness, and you're shining bright. So I hope god gives you the strength to continue. Regarding your question, so my team has treated approximately approximately 7,000 COVID patients at this point. But even more significantly, we've educated 100, if not 1,000 of, by this point, physicians around the world who've done the same. So as a as a collective group, we're in the millions of patients treated high risk patients successfully with COVID. So that's where the perspective I'm coming from. Speaker 0: Okay. I'll drop you there. You've had 7,000 patients. What's your, for want of better of a word, scoreboard or scorecard? How many is, how many how many patients have need hospitalization? How many have been on ventilators? How many patients have you lost from from 7,000? Speaker 1: Well, we haven't lost a patient in the last 8 months, thank God. All total, we've lost 3 patients. We've hospitalized probably somewhere around 20, but they all made they came home. We have around 6 ventilator ventilated patients. And to be honest, those patients are the ones that presented after 2 weeks of being really sick, and there was damage control at that point. And you Speaker 0: that's if I just go through by comparison here, in New South Wales, my state here, we must think something had something like 18,000 COVID cases. I think we've got something like 500 people currently in hospital and something like more than 50 of them on ventilators. So whatever you are you are doing is leaving us in the shade here in New South Wales. You're obviously doing something differently to get the different results. Yeah. How is it possible that you can Speaker 1: Well, there's not. Speaker 0: Such results and in New South Wales here, we have so many more hospitalizations and so many more COVID cases and so many more deaths? Speaker 1: So the answer is very simple. There there are risk factors to die from COVID, and there are only really 2. The first is the doctor you choose because doctors who are just following orders at this point, are delaying treatment for the patients. And by delaying treatment, patients get sicker and transition from the viral infection phase to the inflammatory phase, which causes them to die or at least end up in the hospital. That's so the one risk factor is the incompetent doctor you choose. Number 2 is the government you live under. Because depending on the tyrannical policies of a government, access to life saving medication and to life saving information is being restricted. So for example, Ivermectin now is being HCQ ed. What I mean by that is that if you remember last year, HCQ hydroxychloroquine was vilified as the worst drug in the planet even though it's considered the safest drug in the planet, because it worked. And so they did an effective job in suppressing, the use of hydroxychloroquine. I believe in your country, in New South Wales, a doctor who prescribed hydroxychloroquine could be sentenced to jail. Speaker 0: That's that that that's in the state of Queensland and also Okay. Here in the ACT. But still, I I think you've used hydroxychloroquine. So if you're in the state of Queensland, you would probably be locked up in in jail. And yet you've had these outstanding results. Speaker 1: Well, that's the point. Anything that works is being vilified. And we we should analyze why that is. It's, if you look at the NIH in America, their current, recommendations are not to treat COVID unless you're in a hospital with a oxygen level less than 92. What that is is a policy of a government that wants you to die, not a policy of a government that wants you to survive, and it seems that all the policies that are being enacted globally by the so called leaders, are designed to maintain the narrative of fear and isolation. If you studied any psychological techniques of psychological warfare, which I have, prolonged fear coupled together with human isolation leads to a psychological decompensation of a person, and makes them extremely gullible and easy to manipulate into a course of action that you want them to to participate in. So, for example, when someone's completely living in emotional pain and in distraught, which is essentially what the entire world is in, and then you dangle a false promise to them in front of them, they will gravitate towards anything that will reduce their emotional pain, because who who could live in a chronic state of fear? And so the for example, in the vaccination of, farce, in my opinion, what happens is that, people become believers in a vaccine regardless of the data, regardless of the facts. And, if you attack that narrative, if you question their choices, they become belligerent. Why? Because you're bringing them back into a state of panic. By the way, I am pro COVID 19 vaccine if there was a safe and effective one. I'm not against the vaccine. I'm just anti stupid, and I don't wanna kill my patients. And so, if you look at the let's reverse engineer the worst crime in human history because now we have almost a year and a half of of evidence, and we can now look at different things and and, different puzzle pieces and put it together. If I tell you that anything that's life saving, anything that's been proven to show a reduction in death by 85%, by dozens of studies, like early treatment of COVID 19 with a combination of antiviral drugs, and then that that treatment approach is vilified and suppressed. The knowledge of that treatment approach is is vilified and suppressed. Any doctor who dares to say against the narrative of the government, It could be the world expert in mRNA vaccine design and technology that like Robert Malone, doctor Robert Malone, who designed the vaccine. But because he said something that was contrary to governmental policy, he's deplatformed. That's not that's not a, a society that's interested in the free flow of ideas. This is already full blown tyranny, totalitarian policies, designed to have a certain outcome. It's not about freedom. It's not about truth. It's about manipulation of of information in order to enslave a body of people. Now if you look at the side effects of these vaccines, they're absolutely horrific. I mean, according to VAERS and the European data, they're causing blood clots. They're causing miscarriages, they're causing myocarditis, inflammation of hearts, causing increased rates of cancer, increased rates of autoimmune disease. There's a question about infertility. And then more importantly, between there is this concern of a genocidal potential reaction called ADE that world experts are screaming, saying, hold on. Doctor Luke Montaguer won the Nobel Prize for discovering HIV, saying this is the biggest risk of genocide in the history of humanity. Doctor Michael Yaden, who was the vice president of Pfizer and the director of their vaccine development program, says for every one child that dies from COVID, a 100 will die from the vaccine. Doctor Dolores Cahill from Ireland says, in her opinion, within 2 years, 90% of the people vaccinated will be dead. So and these are world leading thought leaders in the field. So I don't know if they're right or wrong, but one thing I could tell you is if there's a concern about a potential genocidal reaction and when I say genocidal, if if you look in 19 sixties, the RSV vaccine killed kids that they that it was given to, and they found out was because of this reaction of ADE or the your immune system goes crazy and kills the organism. In the 19 seventies, the dengueviral denguevibravirus vaccine did the same exact thing, and they had to stop it. And then historically, all the coronavirus vaccines, all of them, had this ADE reaction in the animals that they tested it on. So I have one simple question. Before we deploy this vaccine, like Bill Gates says, to 7,000,000,000 people, wouldn't it make sense to exclude the potential of this reaction that can kill anyone that you give the vaccine to from actually happening in human beings? It's a rhetorical question. And and the answer is it wasn't done. You're the experiment. That raises a lot of flags. So I'm here, I'm telling you the following. Side effects about these vaccines are being suppressed artificially. We're being lied to. This is doctor Robert Malone, who invented the vaccine, is saying in America, do not take this vaccine. The government is lying to you about the side effects. The guy invented the stuff. The information about life saving treatments is being suppressed. Drugs that have shown an 85% reduction in death are being suppressed. And then there's a global coercion to take a vaccine that the potential for mass murder has not been excluded. So we could take a step back, and now look for the forest of the trees. We have some puzzle pieces that seem to be coming together, and what are these what is the puzzle screaming? What is it what is it saying? Well, let's look at the words of the people that oh, by the way, I have a disclaimer. Do not believe anything that I'm saying. Don't make the same mistake as you do with the government and with blind faith. There's no more blind faith in this generation. What you should do is take the words that I'm saying and test them. Vet them. Do your due diligence. I'm giving you very specific names, very specific information. Go look. Compare to the counternarrative. Look what's being said, and then make your own decision. That's fine. I'm not saying you should believe me. I'm saying you should at least listen to me and then do your due diligence. With that said, if you Google Bill Gates 2 1,015 TED lecture, this sociopath says the following, that the world population needs to be reduced by 15% because of global warming. Those are his words. It's it's a matter of record. Now the same sociopath in 2020, last year, says 7,000,000,000 people need to be vaccinated. One simple question. Why would I take a vaccine for my health, advocated for, and financed by someone who wants to reduce the world population? Speaker 0: Doctor. Greer, one thing that I'm struggling to understand is that when I look at the vaccine, there's the short term adverse effects which there appears to firstly be no adequate measure of actually measuring what they are. There seems to be this, sort of like secondhand voluntary reporting, so we really don't even have a clear, detail of what the short term adverse effects are, but we have no detail whatsoever of what the long term adverse effects are, and yet when we come to, hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, we've got decades of data to show that they're safe and those that are arguing against hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin say, oh, you know, the there's not enough evidence for it. I've done whole a 100% that wanna inject everyone even though they there is 0 long term safety data. It just it just doesn't make sense to me. Speaker 1: Oh, it makes perfect sense to me. But the reason you have trouble with it because you're looking at the world through eyes of a decent person. I don't have that problem. I actually see and understand the essence of of evil. I grew up on the communist Russia's, mentality. My parents suffered from it, and I could see the the techniques of enslavement, the totalitarian, process that we're all going through. I mean, Australia, in my example in my understanding is an example for the rest of the world of what what is coming. I mean, you guys are under martial law almost, and and the people's freedoms have been overtly eroded under the false guise of its its you need to give up your freedom to maintain your safety, where according to the CDC, this disease has a death rate of less than a half percent overall. And with treatment, we can bring it down to almost 0. So what really is going on here, it's not about the truth. It's not about your safety. Okay? It's about inducing global psychosis to enslave people, and this is not a new phenomenon. You see, in my opinion, this is a war against god. There are 2 systems of thought that have collided and cannot coexist. 1 system is god consciousness. That has implications. You see, if I believe that we are made in the image of god, that means your life has sanctity. If your life has sanctity, you have human rights. And if you have human rights, it's not for me to decide how long you could live and how long, how many people should be in the planet. The other system, which is the let's call it the Darwinist survival of the fittest or eugenic system, says that there's a hierarchy of humanity based on genetics or survivability. And what that does is it creates 3 categories, 3 strata of human beings. There's the superhuman, the human, and the subhuman. It sounds like a fairy tale, except 80 years ago, it killed 200,000,000 people because the Nazis believed that they were descendants of Aryan gods, and that made them, the superhumans, and that entitled them to decide who should be enslaved and who should be, dust. So the Anglo Saxons were made to be were meant to be enslaved to Europeans, to serve the Aryans and the subhumans, which I belong to, the the Jews with big beards and and short beards, and, the Slavs and the handicapped and the gypsies and political, opponents. They needed to be thrown into gas chambers and their corpses put into crematoriums and ovens, and they should become dust. Why? Because the Aryans were descendants of of the Nazis were descendants of Aryan gods. This is exactly what's going on now, except it's not anti Semitic. The criteria are completely different now. There's a group of people that truly believe that they have evolved in consciousness to a higher level of illumination, which gives them a vision and insight into the nature of existence, and that entitles them to set policies for the humans and the subhumans. Now these supposedly illuminated, evolved people, in my not so humble opinion, are devolved pagans. There's nothing new under the sun. These are people that are wannabe deities. These are people that believe. What kind of sociopath like Bill Gates could make a statement, I think the world population needs to be reduced. That is a human being who thinks he he knows more than god or that he himself is god. Whereas in reality, we are all suffering because this nerd could not get a girlfriend in high school. And so now he's angry at the entire world, and he's trying to make himself feel better by stepping on our on our heads. He's a true narcissist. By the way, these are psychodynamics that are really happening. Speaker 0: Just going back to your your treatments that you've done. In the early days, obviously, there was great controversy about what you've done, but isn't there now, let's say, we say proof in the pudding or the results are in or the the the runs are on the board, the score your scoreboard is there. Why isn't there other politicians or people from Australia coming to your doorstep and saying, doctor Zelenko, we are now having the COVID, infection numbers like you experienced, you know, like you experienced in New York and in the US. What can we learn from you? What can we tell us? There there seems to be none of that whatsoever. Speaker 1: Well, that's not true. For themselves and their families, they are doing exactly what I've advocated for. Advocated for. For example, I know the whole executive, staff of Google are on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. I'm aware of their doctor who put them on it. Speaker 0: So when you say that, that's that's as what a preventative is, like, a prophylaxis. Speaker 1: Yeah. So they're taking for prevention not to get COVID. They're not taking the vaccine. You know, the White House, the the CDC, the FDA, they're not mandating for their employees the vaccine. Speaker 0: Vaccine. Mhmm. Speaker 1: So the hypocrisy is that there's a double standard. It's the the the people that are empowered, that know the truth, that are doing it for themselves and their families. But for the rest of us mindless sheep, they're advising to to stay away from life saving measures. I'm sorry, but the data is clear. Dozens of studies have shown an 85% percent reduction in hospitalization and death if you treat this thing early, within the first few days of symptoms. That means out of 600,000 dead Americans, for example, 510,000 could've not even gone to the hospital. You see, the crimes here are so massive that the human mind cannot accept or comprehend the scale of the malfeasance and the malevolence. And but that's the problem. In reality, what we're dealing with is a group of very, very, very bad people that have set into motion dangerous policies that are meant to hurt many of us. Speaker 0: This is what I the only thing I can't get my head around. Your treatments of hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, zinc, and I think you use azithromycin as as the antibody. You throw vitamin d in there as well. They also seem such very benign treatments that have many years of data of safety. If you're going into this terrible pandemic, surely you'll be throwing everything you possibly could at it, surely they these things would be worth worth trying even if you didn't think that they were any good. Surely they're worth trying but it appears to be they're they're blocked in the the standard treatment we have here in Australia. Because if you catch COVID, it's basically go home, you know, lay in bed. And if you have trouble breathing, call an ambulance, and we'll take you to hospital. It just seems to be so bizarre that you our authorities wouldn't suggest some of these treatments that you've shown yourself actually worked. Speaker 1: Well, that was that's my thinking. When I started, with treating my patients, it was in March of 2020. There was no other treatments available except go home and die. And I decided that that's not a good treatment plan. So I innovated, and I tried new things. And with the grace of god, hydroxychloroquine together with zinc, now I understand it's not really hydroxychloroquine. It's zinc ionophores. Hydroxychloroquine is one of the zinc ionophores, but the whole idea is you need to get enough zinc inside the cell to stop the virus from growing, and zinc needs help getting inside the cell. Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are 2 prescription drugs that let zinc get inside the cell. However, there are some over the counter options, which I think every Australian should know about because that's a way to say f u to your government and and to live, is that by taking quercetin or EGCG. Quercetin is a natural plant derivative. It comes from vegetables. So I don't know if you have anything does your government have anything against vegetables? Speaker 0: Apples. And perhaps they are saying an apple a day keeps the doctor away. Maybe it's the corsetum in the apples. Speaker 1: It's not a joke because the it turns out I'm gonna give you a piece of information that may clarify some things. You heard of a there's a certain infection in the world called influenza. Maybe you heard of it. And influenza is responsible for, around a $1,000,000,000,000 in business, over a decade, maybe even more. So it's a very lucrative business, whether it's flu shots or contact tracing. Here, it turns out something very interesting, that the same treatment for COVID nineteen, which inhibits RNA dependent RNA polymerase for the layperson, it's the enzyme that helps make copies of the virus. It turns out that influenza uses the same mechanism. So to translate that, what that means, I'll make it very simple. The same quercetin and zinc or hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and zinc, or there's something else, the green tea extract called EGCG. It's also over the counter. And zinc, not only does it shut down all the COVID strains by the way, I just said all the COVID strains, Alpha, beta, South African, Delta, Lambda, and every other future one. It shuts them all down, but it also shuts down all the influenza viruses. So what that means is a 20¢ a pill remedy could destroy a $1,000,000,000,000 business. So perhaps that could be one of the reasons that the powers, the stakeholders who have deeply invested themselves into these this industry are so scared and so afraid that they have vilified, threatened any doctor in the world who's willing to stand up and say, you're hiding something. You're not letting the public have safe treatments, cheap treatments. For example, hydroxychloroquine has been around for 65 years 66 years now, actually. And it's been used in pregnant women, in nursing mothers, and in children for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and lupus and malaria, and it's completely safe. Ivermectin has been used 4,000,000,000 times, and it's completely safe. So what's not safe is out of control COVID. See, COVID is 2 diseases. I'll say it again. The first disease is curable. It's the first 5 days of the viral load. You can it's so easy to cure. It's so easy to treat. It's easier to treat than the flu. However, if you let it get out of control, it sets off a internal inferno, which makes it almost impossible to save the person. So timing is everything. So what what the policy is designed by the Australian government, I'll speak directly to the Australian people, are designed to hurt you. They're designed to delay treatment and so that your illness should progress to a stage where you need to end up in a hospital and get more expensive treatments or even die. So your prime minister and your leader ship is basically, they're prostitutes that have sold themselves out to the stakeholders. And whoever they are, it's the the the interest is not the protection of the Australian public. That's not their point. That's they're making qua quarantine concentration camps for your own good. You should go there with a smile. I mean, what are you? Insane? You know, I'm a Hasidic Jew. By the way, that attack on you about you being an anti Semite, I found was anti Semitic because you said something very accurate. I do have a big Jewish beer, and you're one of the biggest my best friends. Yes. I don't know what these morons are thinking, or I do know what they're thinking. They're trying to vilify your reputation because you're over target. You are actually saying the truth. You are putting in danger and threatening their false narrative of of enslavement of the Australian public. So this Hasidic Jew who's more than 40 of his own relatives were shot or buried alive in Kyiv during World War 2 by the Nazis in a forest of was called Babi Yar, okay, knows very well, viscerally, what genocide is. I don't need to be lectured, and I don't use that word lightly. And I'm telling you, the Australian people are on the verge of a genocide because of the policies of your government. So rise up non violently, but there's many more of you than them. Just say no. No. Look at your truck drivers. I I have to give a shout out to the Fox family, who I believe is, in the trucking industry, because thank god for your truck drivers. There are, I guess, tough men and women, and and they're saying no. We're gonna shut you down. Write it off. Protect your families. Speaker 0: So what's what's your recommendation medical recommendation in an area where, COVID is is is fairly significant in a society? What should people do to protect themselves? Our our governments are hiding doors and and and wear a mask. What what would your recommendations be? Speaker 1: As someone that's define success. Don't die, don't end up with a respirator, and don't go to the hospital. And the way to do that, it's very simple. Get into your house for things that are over the counter. Get vitamin d, vitamin c, zinc, and one of 2 things or both, quercetin or EGCG. By the way, I have a website. It's free. It has all the dosing on it. It's important. I'm not gonna give you the dosing now. Too complicated. But it has the dosing that you should at least consider taking. Speaker 0: That that website, I understand. It's it's Vladimir Zelenkomd.com. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's my name and my credentials.com. Okay. Right. And so if you if you're I'll make it very simple because people need guidance. If you're over the age of 45 or you have any medical problems, take prevention. Consider it your new vaccine. Take prevention. Put the stuff into your body, make sure you have enough zinc inside your cells and enough vitamin d, because vitamin d is a bulletproof vest, and zinc kills the virus. And you need vitamin c and and quercetin, for example, to get enough zinc inside the cell, it's a gun and a bullet. You need the bullet in the right place. And quercetin and c is is the gun. Of course, I prefer a 50 caliber machine gun, which is hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. But the reality is you have to go to war with what you have, not what you wish you have. So if you don't have the 50 caliber machine gun, take the 22 caliber pistol and use it also because it will save your life. And so you take it before you're sick. This way you don't get sick. Now nothing's a 100%. So if you do get sick, then you have to triple the dosing if you cannot get the 50 caliber machine gun. And Speaker 0: all that select details there on your on your website as well for for people to go and see. We'll make sure we put a link up to that so people can go and and have a look themselves. My other question too is, our prime minister and our opposition leader, both major parties, seem to be very keen to inject the 12 year old, boys and girls. I understand you have children, in that age bracket, somewhere around that. What are your thoughts on giving these injections to 12 year old children? Speaker 1: Well, if if you believe in child sacrifice, like, if you if you think cutting the throat of a child is a good idea, or taking a child and throwing it off a cliff, or putting it into a volcano, then injecting this vaccine is a very good idea if you if you believe in child sacrifice. Doctor Michael Yidden, who was the vice president of Pfizer, Maybe you heard of that company. And the head of their vaccine development program said to me personally, it is not hearsay, he said it to me, that for every one child that dies from COVID, a 100 will die from the vaccine. So if that's not child sacrifice, I don't know how you define it. But in a demographic that according to the CDC, if you're looking today, has a 99.998 percent survival rate from COVID without treatment. That means a 100% survival almost. Okay? To inject them with something that causes blood clots, myocarditis, cancer, autoimmune diseases, and a potential of infertility, and this potential of ADE is a crime of biblical scale, is a crime against humanity, and whoever's advocating from it should hang from a rope at the Hague. I don't know if I answered your question. Speaker 0: I think you did. I think you did. You also mentioned, I think at one stage, you would you think that for children that, influenza is more dangerous to them than COVID. Speaker 1: It's not what I think. It's the data. Influenza kills more kids than COVID. Speaker 0: So isn't the case isn't this the case that the injection of the children is actually being done not to protect the children, but to protect the adults or or supposedly to protect the adults, which to me seems the complete reversal of what being a human is that you you protect the kids. You you don't to use the word effective using children as human shields. It just seems to me the reversal of everything that, that is is in our genes that we protect our children first. We sacrifice our ourselves to try and make things better for our kids and future generations. It just seems we've got things so back upfront. Speaker 1: Any normal human being with normal decent values wants the best for their children and for them to have a better life than they had, for them to achieve more, for them to progress and experience the beauty of god's greatness, even to a higher deeper level of consciousness. And these policies so first of all, if you're afraid of grandma and you're such a believer in this vaccine, so vaccinate grandma and leave the kids alone. The reality is the vaccine doesn't work. It doesn't protect grandma. And it's not designed to protect grandma, and it's not designed to protect the grand the kids. It's designed to give power to the essence of evil, which is the prime minister of your country and and people of that caliber that have prostituted themselves and sold the people out of their country that they've been elected to protect. It's a disgrace and an affront to God. Speaker 0: Where do you see this going? At the moment, we see in Israel, it was 2 injections was they're called fully vaccinated that gave you that gave you freedom. Now it appears as though that, I think they're called the green pass in Israel will be revoked after 6 months, and they're gonna have 3rd injection. I imagine it'll be a 4th or 5th. It just seems to be these people who wanna have injections forever. Speaker 1: I see a glorious future. Everything I've said is doom and gloom, but I actually see that the world is on the verge of a transformation. It's gonna be bumpy. There's gonna be some turbulence. There's gonna be, a few moments of unpleasantness, but the world will not tolerate anymore the the lives. We will not live anymore under this false narrative that sociopaths have crafted, and our eyes have been opened. And what we need, the solution here is a grassroots awakening of consciousness of decent human beings that we should coalesce together into a new society of truth loving people that protect each other against the tyranny of a few sociopaths. And there's many, many more of us than them. You know, one Nazi with one German shepherd could shepherd 10,000 sheep into a gas chamber. Why? Because the sheep let them. Okay? It is true that if everyone arose, some of the people would have been killed, But eventually, they would have trampled that Nazi. Okay. We need to trample in a nonviolent way the enemies of humanity by the arousal of the human spirit and banding together of god centered like minded people who value freedom for their children. Do not submit to this tyranny. Stop being blind. I have to watch my words. Stop being submissive. Rise up, in a non violent way, but rise up and say no. Speaker 0: Thanks for your time, doctor Zelenka. I know it's it's very difficult. Also, I understand that, you have some health challenges. And while you've been doing this great work at teaching so many other doctors, you know, you've I think there's someone upstairs looking after you and keeping you, a bit safe that you keep in your work. Our prayers from everyone in Australia. Speaker 1: Thank you. You know, I, I think there's a reason why you should listen to me. Because I may have only another few months to live. God forbid, but that's the reality. I just got diagnosed with recurrent cancer. It's not operable, and I have to try now some experimental treatments. I hope they work, but it's everything's in god's hands. But while I still have consciousness, my head is still working, and my mouth is still able to speak, I will continue to send this message to people. By the way, it's not about my ego. It's not about me wanting power or fame. I'm so past that. When someone is in this stage of life, where they really think that they're gonna be meeting the creator soon, None of that matters. What matters is truth. What matters is alignment of will with the creator, and I want a better future for your children and my children. And and and so I'm begging you. I'm pleading you. Pleading with with normal people. Wake up. Say no to the tyranny, let's band together, and destroy, in a nonviolent way, this enemy. Speaker 0: Thanks, doctor Zelenka. We really appreciate your time. We're all praying for you down here in Australia. We thank you. We thank you for the work that you've done. Speaker 1: God bless you, minister, and God bless the people of Australia. And thank you so much. Speaker 0: Thanks, dear. Thanks, sir. Bye.
Saved - November 19, 2024 at 7:31 PM

@craigkellyXXX - Craig Kelly

Today, the era of Covid Vaccine Hysteria is officially over. https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/a-systematic-review-of-autopsy-findings-in-deaths-after-covid-19-vaccination/ All mRNA "vaccines" must be pulled from the market. The arrests of those that pushed these shots should begin.

A Systematic Review Of Autopsy Findings In Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Background: The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of publichealthpolicyjournal.com
Saved - November 13, 2024 at 4:14 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Albanese’s Mis & Disinformation Bill, influenced by WEF globalists, aims to circumvent the US Constitution and impose censorship on the global internet. It targets content accessible to Australians, meaning posts by Americans, like Dr. Brian Tyson's Covid treatment updates, fall under its jurisdiction. If deemed "misinformation" by ACMA, X Corp could face hefty fines, leading to Australian bureaucrats dictating community standards for the platform. This could set a precedent for global standards shaped by local regulations.

@craigkellyXXX - Craig Kelly

Albanese’s Mis & Disinformation Bill has been drafted by WEF globalists in an attempt to get around the US Constitution and censor Americans and the entire global internet. The Bill applies to content that "is PROVIDED on the digital service to one or more end users IN Australia" . Therefore the Bill applies to all content posted on X in the USA by Americans that is "provided" to Australians. So if Dr Brian Tyson sitting in his Californian office posts something on his X page about how he is successfully treating Covid patients - and as X platform is global, that to post is "provided" to Australians - therefore Dr. Tyson’s post is captured by the Australian legislation. So if the eSafety Karen zealots at ACMA deem that what Dr Tyson posted is "misinformation" they can fine X corp $250 million for not censoring Dr Tyson. And the legislation gives the eSafety Karen zealots at ACMA the power to write the community standards for X corp as to what is "misinformation" The plan of these globalists is because the potential fines are so huge, that these "community standards" written by Australian leftist Government bureaucrats will become the default global standards. https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/bills/r7239_first-reps/toc_pdf/24106b01.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf

Azure WAF Azure WAF JS Challenge parlinfo.aph.gov.au

@BrianTaxpayers - Brian Marlow

Australia’s draft #MisinformationBill has severe global ramifications for free speech. Have a look at Clause 3 which extends the bill’s reach BEYOND Australian borders, allowing unelected bureaucrats to regulate social media companies outside Australia if they provide services to Australians. This means U.S.-based platforms like Facebook, Google, and X could be forced to comply with Australian censorship standards that go against First Amendment protections. the content doesn’t even need to be false to be removed—it just has to be deemed “harmful” by authorities. If platforms don’t comply, they risk massive fines, pressuring them to enforce Australian censorship globally to avoid penalties. This will set a dangerous precedent, creating a global standard that pressures platforms to censor content across borders, ultimately killing free speech worldwide. Democracies worldwide must stand against this bill and protect open discourse. I believe it’s vital for global leaders and elected officials who stand for free speech— the cornerstone of every liberal democracy — to take action. I encourage them to write to @AlboMP and @MRowlandMP, urging them to withdraw the Misinformation Bill and protect online discourse.

Saved - October 14, 2024 at 8:42 PM

@craigkellyXXX - Craig Kelly

Why is it that biggest spreaders of "Misinformation" over the past few years are the very same people that are now demanding the suppression & censorship of the free speech of those that would hold them to account ? https://t.co/KvrtNOGtij

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's easy to blame those who believe or spread mis/disinformation. Governments, internet, and social media companies have a responsibility to prevent the spread of harmful lies and promote access to accurate health information. The WHO is working with partners, companies, and researchers to understand how misinformation and disinformation spreads, who is targeted, how they are influenced, and what can be done to counter this problem.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's easy to blame, dismiss, ridicule, or insult those who believe or spread mis or disinformation. To be sure, governments and internet and social media companies have a responsibility to prevent the spread of harmful lies and promote access to accurate health information. WHO is working with a range of partners, companies, and researchers, and partners to understand how misinformation and disinformation spreads, who is targeted, how they are influenced, and what we can do to counter this problem.
Saved - September 15, 2024 at 1:26 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I just published a large-scale, peer-reviewed, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted across 11 countries with 80 authors, showing that President Trump was correct about Hydroxychloroquine. I'm curious about the likelihood of the corrupted media reporting this. Propaganda and fake news stem not only from what is reported but also from what is omitted.

@craigkellyXXX - Craig Kelly

Just published large scale peer-reviewed, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial, undertaken across 11 countries with 80 authors demonstrates that President Trump was right on Hydroxychloroquine. I wonder what chance there is any of corrupted media will report this ? Propaganda and fake news doesn’t just comes what they report - it also comes from what they don’t report. @abcnews @Mediawat@9NewsAUS @guardiannews @cnnbrk @SkyNewsAust @dailytelegraph @auspol_stories @ABC https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004428…

Evaluation of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for the prevention of COVID-19 (COPCOV): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial In a randomised controlled trial, William Schilling and co-workers investigate potential prevention of COVID-19 by chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine. journals.plos.org

@craigkellyXXX - Craig Kelly

THE EVIDENCE IS IN. HCQ WAS HIGHLY EFFECTIVE AGAINST COVID Everyone that demonised or politicised Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has blood on their hands, starting with Albanese and Bowen. And every senior health bureacrat that ignored the evidence on HCQ should be charged with negligent mass homicide and jailed for lengthy periods for their reckless incompetence. The latest study, published Sept 12, 2024 - a large scale (HCQ/CQ = 2,320; placebo = 2,332) peer-reviewed, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial, undertaken across 11 countries with 80 authors from April 29, 2020 to March 10, 2022 has found that Hydroxchloroquine and Chloroquine used as a preventative in the unvaccinated; Reduced covid cases by 57% Reduced severe illness by 46% Reduced work days lost by 23% With no serious adverse events from the HCQ or CQ Further, this published peer-reviewed study also includes a meta-analysis of this and 11 other RCTs confirming significantly lower COVID-19 cases with HCQ. These results demonstrate that HCQ was superior to the covid vaccines, without the vaccine’s deadly side effects. The authors concluded that HCQ/CQ could have been deployed with benefit early in the pandemic. However, it is highly concerning that results of this study were not published for 820 days after completion. When so many were dying from Covid, it is inconceivable that authors did not know the results earlier and would take 820 days to publish. Perhaps they didn’t want to disrupt the vaccine sales. https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004428 The tragic tale of the millions of deaths that resulted from groupthink, politicisation and censorship on HCQ provide a clear example of the dangers of Labor’s Misinformation & Disinformation (MAD) Bill. The question of the effectiveness of HCQ should have been debated rigorously in an untrammelled clash of opinion. Instead criminally negligent & incompetent government bureaucrats thought they knew best, and censored debate, but they were just stooges for Big Pharma who had to kill off the competition from HCQ to get their billion dollar pay day from selling the rushed experimental vaccines. And the corrupted media played along as ignorant politicians played political games seeking power. And even today, having been brainwashed, weak minded & toxic individuals will continue to ignore the science & believe that HCQ is ineffective. And now, the very same fools that claimed these scientifically established facts on HCQ were ’misinformation" want more powers to censor debate and appointment themselves as the arbiter of truth. We need to scrap this dangerous anti-free speech bill and get back to what Sir Robert Menzies argued; Now, why is this freedom of speech]of real importance to humanity? The answer is that what appears to be today’s truth is frequently tomorrow’s error. There is nothing absolute about the truth. It is elusive. In the old phrase, “it lies at the bottom of a deep well”. It is hard to come at. So few of us have objective minds – detached minds – and what we conceive to be the truth is very often coloured or distorted by our own passions or interests or prejudices. Hence, if truth is to emerge and in the long run be triumphant, the process of free debate – the untrammelled clash of opinion – must go on.

Evaluation of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for the prevention of COVID-19 (COPCOV): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial In a randomised controlled trial, William Schilling and co-workers investigate potential prevention of COVID-19 by chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine. journals.plos.org
Saved - June 24, 2024 at 9:14 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
A recent study from South Korea has found evidence that the COVID vaccines may damage cognition. The study analyzed the health records of millions of individuals and revealed alarming increases in depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease among the vaccinated group. Dr. Pierre Kory, who treats vaccine injuries, has observed brain fog as a common symptom in his patients. The post criticizes political cartoonists for not using their platform to raise awareness about the potential risks of the experimental vaccines and promote alternative treatments like Ivermectin and HCQ. The author believes that the suffering caused by the vaccines could have been avoided.

@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly

THE TRAGIC IRONY Back in early 2021, a cartoonist thought it would be "funny" to mock me for warning that the experimental covid mRNA injections were using a novel technology and had no medium or long term safety data - with a syringe going through my brain . And those brainwashed into believing that the covid injections were some type of "magic potion" that could not be questioned giggled & laughed. Well, we now know that the covid vaccines cross the protective Blood-Brain Barrier depositing the inflammatory lipids & toxic spike protein in the brain. And the laughing & giggling has stopped with a new just published study out of South Korea providing evidence that the covid ’vaccines’ damage cognition. This new study from South Korea analyzed the electronic health records of 2.2 million and later 4.3 million individuals in Seoul. What researchers found was a vaccine induced catastrophe. By comparing the rates of various new medical conditions in vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups over three months, the study revealed that the vaccinated experienced: 💉A 68% rise in depression 💉A 44% surge in anxiety and related disorders 💉A 93.4% increase in sleep disorders 💉A staggering 138% jump in mild cognitive impairment 💉A 23% rise in Alzheimer's disease Dr. Pierre Kory writes: “In my practice of treating vaccine injuries, one of the three most common symptoms I see is brain fog. So many of my patients had been in the prime of their lives, can now barely function, have significant cognitive impairment and need a lot of help from our nurses to carry out their treatment plans. I never imagined I would see any of this in people far younger than me and instead I see it every day. I bear witness to an immense amount of suffering on a daily basis that is hard to put into words.” If only political cartoonists like David Rowe had of used their skills to rally against the human rights abusive mandates, warn people about the potential risks from the experimental jabs, and inform people about the effectiveness of Ivermectin & HCQ (combined with zinc & Azithromycin/Doxycycline), Vitamin D and Betadine - But instead, they joined in the groupthink that the "vaccine" was some type of "magic potion" - and now we are just starting to see the tip of the ice-berg of this catastrophe & suffering that could have and should been avoided.

Saved - June 23, 2024 at 11:32 AM

@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly

Justice is closing in. Romanian MEP Cristian Terheş asks why Ursula von der Leyen would sign a €71 billion contract with Pfizer to buy 4.6 billion vaccine doses (10 doses per citizen). https://t.co/WP5kOXy2MF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ursula von der Leyen should resign as President of the European Commission due to criminal investigations into vaccine contracts. The European Public Prosecutor's Office is looking into contracts worth billions of euros for COVID-19 vaccines, signed without public disclosure. This lack of transparency is concerning for EU citizens. Resignation is necessary. Thank you. Translation: Ursula von der Leyen should resign as President of the European Commission due to criminal investigations into vaccine contracts. The European Public Prosecutor's Office is looking into contracts worth billions of euros for COVID-19 vaccines, signed without public disclosure. This lack of transparency is concerning for EU citizens. Resignation is necessary. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mr. President, dear colleagues, Ursula von der Leyen must immediately and unconditionally resign from her position as President of the European Commission due to the fact that her actions are currently criminally investigated by the European Public Prosecutor's Office. EPPO just announced few days ago that it's investigating the way the contracts were signed between the European Commission and the producers of vaccines, and this is what the court of auditors just stated in the report released few days ago, and I quote, the commission has signed up to November 2021, 71,000,000,000 worth euros worth of contracts on behalf of the member states to purchase up to 4,600,000,000 COVID 9 19 vaccine doses. That means that she purchased 10 doses of vaccines for every EU citizen based on contracts that were never released to the public. This is how the contract that she signed with this pharmaceutical companies were released to the public. How is this possible in the European Union that is called to be transparent with the way of using people's money? So I'm asking again and calling again for immediate and unconditional resignation. Thank you.
Saved - June 12, 2024 at 3:48 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Australia's former Deputy Chief Health Officer revealed he hasn't received a Covid vaccine in 2 years and has no plans to get one, citing his belief that he doesn't need it based on scientific evidence. This raises questions about the mandates imposed by vaccine proponents.

@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly

Australia’s former Deputy Chief Health Officer has admitTed he hasn’t had a Covid injection for 2 years - and stated he’s not getting any more. The doctor further stated; “I don’t think I need anymore and THE SCIENCE tells me I don't”. Where does this leave the fanatics that have continued to mandate these shots over the past two years ?

Video Transcript AI Summary
I stopped getting COVID vaccines 2 years ago after having 3 doses. I believe I don't need more based on science.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have to soldier on. Like, they finally got vaccinated for COVID? No. When did you stop doing that? About 2 years ago. I had 3 vaccines and that's been enough for me. Any reason why? Because I don't think I need any more, Ben, and, the science tells me that I don't. I'm with you.
Saved - June 9, 2024 at 6:33 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The Liberals ordered 267 million Covid vaccine shots, costing $18 billion. Labor is trying to cover up the details. Around 75% of the shots ordered were wasted, but the Canberra bureaucracy sees it as an "effective & efficient" use of taxpayer's money. Join ONE NATION to fight against this and take on the UNIPARTY.

@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly

THE UNIPARTY AT WORK The Liberals ordered 267 million shots of the Covid vaccines (10 for every man, women, transgender, child & baby in Australia) at a cost of $18 billion - and now Labor are trying to cover up the details. And despite around 75% of shots ordered being unused and wasted, the Canberra bureaucracy consider this an "effective & efficient" use of taxpayer’s money. Enough is enough. Australia deserves better, join the revolt - join ONE NATION and fight back against this nonsense. https://www.onenation.org.au/join Only ONE NATION will take on the UNIPARTY. https://www.onenation.org.au/join

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Roberts questions the Minister on the excessive purchase of COVID vaccines for Australia. The Minister explains the need for a portfolio approach to ensure vaccine access for all Australians. The exact number of doses delivered remains confidential due to commercial sensitivity. Senator Roberts insists on transparency, citing the committee's power to gather evidence. The Minister agrees to refer the matter to the Minister for Health if necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator Roberts. Speaker 1: Thank you, Chair. I'd like to continue with the questions I had before. Minister, the purchases of COVID injection doses was, by any measure, excessive. $18,000,000,000 cost, yet we have only used 37% of Pfizer, 26% of Moderna, 25% of AstraZeneca and 1% of Novavax. Why did we buy 267,000,000 vaccines for a population of 27,000,000 people? Speaker 2: Thanks. For your questions, senator. I think professor Kelly, went through some of the rationale for, the COVID purchasing arrangements earlier. But but just to to recap, I think the most important consideration at the time was to ensure that every Australian would have access to, COVID 19 vaccines. It was necessary at the time, given it was a new vaccine, a a whole, you know, new disease to have a portfolio approach to our purchasing. So, so we had a number of vaccines purchased, and we needed to make sure, that, you know, they were they were all going to be safe and effective and have enough for each of the vaccines to cover the population. I would note that, we remain in terms of the, the vaccine program with purchasing that's carrying through into the future as as well and currently. So some of the vaccines numbers you gave are are the ones that are currently going through through the system, and that we have an acceptable level of waste for the program, which is something that we look into to make sure it's an effective and efficient use of public money. Speaker 1: So by my simple calculations, 267,000,000 vaccines is 10 each. That's for people who didn't want didn't wanna be vaccinated as well. So so it's even more than 10 per person, per Australian, per baby. Speaker 2: I I won't question your math, senator, but I think I think going back to my comment about having a portfolio approach, and noting that, you know, different different vaccines, under the advice of the Australian technical advisory group on immunization have been recommended over time for different groups, such as the AstraZeneca vaccine. It was necessary to have, you know, some flexibility in the purchasing arrangements. Speaker 1: Were all of the 267,000,000 doses delivered to Australia? Speaker 2: Were they at the at at what time period? Speaker 1: Have they all been delivered? Speaker 2: No. No. Some of them some of them continue to arrive through through our advanced purchasing agreements. Speaker 1: So how many have arrived and how many yet to arrive? Speaker 2: So, due to commercial sensitivities and the secrecy provisions in the contracts, not able to answer specific questions relating to specific vaccines vaccines around that. I will I am able to tell you how many we purchased, of the different vaccines, and and, you know, some of the uptake that we've had overall, which has been 71,000,000 vaccines have been administered over the last few years. Speaker 1: So that's about a quarter of what we've bought? Speaker 2: Yes. So far. So you're There's more coming every day. Speaker 1: So you're refusing to tell us how many have been delivered because of commercial sensitivity? Speaker 2: Yes. To date. Yes. Speaker 0: Well, I'm I'm The requirements of the contract of the agreements with the company. Speaker 1: I don't understand it, minister, that miss Fisher is required to produce to this committee any information or documents that are requested. And I've requested the number of the vaccines that have not been delivered. Speaker 0: But there's also, I don't know what you're reading from there, but within the Standing orders. Standing orders, there's also, you know, exemptions or you know, provisions for things like commercial in confidence but we can tell you how much has been our extent. We can go through how many has been purchased from each company. And I would imagine, to say that, you know, you could answer about, you know, that the agreements are being conducted in accordance with the requirements of the contract, for example, you know. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: I mean, that's that's the transparency but there are still legitimate reasons before committees that matters remain, commercial in confidence or Speaker 1: Well, as I understand in confidence, Speaker 0: a range of different reasons. Speaker 1: As I understand it, minister, there's no privacy, security, freedom of information, or other legislation that overrides this committee's constitutional powers to gather evidence. And miss Fisher and yourself are protected from any potential prosecution as a result of your evidence or producing documents to this committee. So if you want to seek indemnity from providing that then you have to submit it to the commit committee. Speaker 0: We we certainly if you if you're insisting Yes. We provide that then I can refer the matter to the minister for health.
Membership Join Pauline Hanson in her stand for the values that make Australia great. Join our party and fight for your rights and freedoms. onenation.org.au
Membership Join Pauline Hanson in her stand for the values that make Australia great. Join our party and fight for your rights and freedoms. onenation.org.au
Saved - May 11, 2024 at 6:47 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Elon Musk is thanked for sharing a post about a peer-reviewed study on Ivermectin's effectiveness against Covid. The author believes that Facebook, YouTube, and possibly Twitter would censor this information due to it not aligning with their narrative.

@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly

Thank you Elon Musk. A million views and counting of my post detailing the latest peer-reviewed double-blind randomised controlled trial that shows Ivermectin works against Covid. For this science is censored by Facebook & YouTube (and would be under the old Twitter) because it doesn’t fit the narrative.

@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly

AND ANOTHER : New Study, Ivermectin works again. Double-blind randomised controlled study finds Ivermectin reduced ICU admissions by 83% (P <0.001) Its time that those involved in denying sick and/or dying covid patients access to Ivermectin were arrested and charged with criminal negligence and crimes against humanity. And don’t expect to find the results of this just published (April 30, 2024) study reported by the ABC or our corrupted MS Media. They’s rather cover-up these fundings than admit they were wrong. And what of all the poor simpletons that were so easily propagandised, tricked into believing that Ivermectin was a horse paste ? Will they apologise for their stupidity & ignorance? https://brieflands.com/articles/jjhs-146703 Ivermectin as an adjunct treatment for hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients: A randomized multi-center clinical trial - Varnaseri et al., A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 110 patients with moderate-to-severe (non-critical) confirmed COVID-19 infection. The patients were equally divided into two groups, with one group receiving ivermectin tablets (14 mg every 12 hours for three days) and the other group receiving a placebo. Results: A total of 110 patients, including 62 (56.4%) men and 48 (43.6%) women, with an average age of 53.36 ± 15.10 years, were enrolled in our double-blind, randomized clinical trial. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. The findings demonstrated that ivermectin significantly reduced the need for; 😀Intensive Care Unit admission (32.7% vs. 5.5%; P < 0.001), 😀hospitalization duration (six vs. four days; P < 0.001), and 😀median time to symptom resolution period (P < 0.05) in COVID-19 patients compared to the placebo group, without any serious side effects (P > 0.05). Based on our findings, ivermectin can be important in shortening the time to resolve symptoms such as fever, shivering, myalgia, cough, dyspnea, vomiting, and diarrhea. A recently conducted case series study has shown that combination therapy with doxycycline and ivermectin can also shorten the time to resolution for some symptoms related to COVID-19 infection in mild to moderate cases These findings agree with those reported by Ahmed et al., who assessed the effects of a 5-day therapeutic regimen consisting of ivermectin on CRP and LDH levels, representing the severity of the inflammatory phase of the illness (23). In addition to its direct antiviral effect, this medication activates inhibitory pathways involved in the inflammatory process, such as TNF-alpha, interleukin-8, and LL-37. Subsequently, there is an indirect activation of interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-18, which results in a decrease in neutrophilic and eosinophilic chemotaxis and improvement in the signs and symptoms, shortening of the course of the illness, and faster resolution of abnormal laboratory findings. Moreover, no serious adverse effects of this medication have been observed among the drug arm participants. Therefore, it seems this medication should be considered as a potential treatment for COVID-19 ……"

Ivermectin as a Potential Addition to the Limited Anti-COVID-19 Arsenal: A Double-Blinded Clinical Trial Addressing the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a significant challenge for healthcare systems globally. Despite the absence of a proven... brieflands.com
Saved - April 18, 2024 at 8:11 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The eSafety Commissioner's decision to censor a video depicting an attack on Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel has sparked concerns about censorship and the ability to face the realities of violence. The author questions the purpose of censoring a video that has already been widely viewed and highlights the inconsistency in censoring the video but not still shots. They also raise examples of other disturbing videos and question whether those should be censored as well. The author emphasizes the need to deal with real-world violence without government censorship, except in cases where the video incites violence. They also criticize the eSafety Commissioner for not taking action against hate speech videos.

@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly

A CONTROL FREAK ON A POWER TRIP : SACK THE eSAFTEY COMMISSIONER Warning : Unelected Censorship Julie has ruled Australians must be prohibited from seeing the following video (after everyone has already seen it) 🫣It’s horrific and very disturbing - but why should the video of attack on Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel by censored at the whim of the eSafety Commissioner ? It’s real life, it actually happened. It’s not fake news or "misinformation". 🫣The video doesn’t glorify violence - so why should the paternalistic eSafety Commissioner decide if Australians should or shouldn’t be allowed to view it. ? 🫣And other than a control freak getting their kicks from a power trip - what’s the point of censoring it after millions have already seen it ? 🫣And why censor the video, but not the still shots ? 🫣But the real concern is, how are we going to face the realities and consequences of Islamic extremism in the real world, if the real world is being censored ? 🫣How can we debate the issue if we are not allowed to see what happened ? 🫣Would have Censorship Julie have censored the horrific and highly disturbing images of a young girl naked screaming and burnt by napalm dropped by American bombers during the Vietnam War ? 🫣Or what about the extreme brutality and highly distressing scenes of Dan Andrews’ militia during Covid bashing citizens, stomping on heads and firing rubber bullets into the backs of peaceful protestors - should that be censored and Australians prohibited from seeing the truth ? 🫣Or was that OK because it sent a "message" to anyone that questioned government policy ? 🫣Or what of videos of people in distress from Covid vaccine injuries - should these be censored ? 🫣The world is a tough brutal place, but how can we deal with the realities of real world violence, if the real world is being censored ? 🫣It’s dangerous enough to allow government bureaucrats to be the arbiters of truth, and censor what they deem as "misinformation" - but it’s another thing to give them the power to censor real life situations. The only exceptions should be where the video is used to incite violence. Further, the video actually shows a miracle. To be struck as he was 6 times and to survive was a true miracle - it shows that someone was looking after the Bishop. Should this be censored ? 🫣And where was the eSafety Commissioner, Censorship Julie when videos showing hate preachers inciting violence (something that is unlawful) were being posted across the internet. ? 🤐And am I even allowed to post this video criticising Censorship Julie’s censorship - will she demand that X censor this criticism of her ?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent attacks at a church in Fairfield prompt consequences for noncompliance. Graduated powers include civil proceedings, fines based on severity, and link deletion notices. Content must be removed within 24 hours to prevent further spread. If companies fail to act, formal removal powers will be used. Notices have been issued to X Corp and will be sent to Meta. Translation: Recent attacks at a church in Fairfield prompt consequences for noncompliance. Graduated powers include civil proceedings, fines based on severity, and link deletion notices. Content must be removed within 24 hours to prevent further spread. If companies fail to act, formal removal powers will be used. Notices have been issued to X Corp and will be sent to Meta.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Night beat attacks at the Fairfield Church yesterday. What are the consequences of Well, we have a range of, graduated powers. There could be civil proceedings and we could take them to court or we could fine them. Of course, the quantum of the fine would depend on the gravity of the noncompliance, but we can use graduated tools like link deletion notices. So if they fail to remove the content, then we can go to the search engines such as Google or Bing to really minimize the amount of content the Australians can see. To really minimize the amount of content the Australians can see. And how much time do they have to remove this, this content? We expect them to remove this expeditiously within the next 24 hours. We know that every minute counts. And the more more this content is up there, the more that is re shared, the more the velocity and the virality continues, and we need to stem that. You do have powers to remove this content that's not, actioned on by these companies. Are you prepared to use those powers if they don't come to the table? We've already just issued a notice to X Corp to use these, formal removal powers. We will be issuing notices to Meta today.
Saved - April 5, 2024 at 1:39 AM

@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly

This is only going to get worse across many countries as more and more people awake to what they did. Those that violated human rights and the Nuremberg code by forcing others to undergo an ineffective, unsafe & unnecessary experimental medical intervention are going to be held accountable.

@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker

Former Health Minister Roberto Speranza, who enforced vaccinations can no longer move without police protection. The Italians are waiting for him everywhere and shouting "Murderer" https://t.co/B5G0TXuZ58

Saved - March 11, 2024 at 8:52 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Professor Norman Fenton exposes statistical tricks used by vaccine fanatics to falsely claim vaccine efficacy. Classifying recently injected individuals as "unvaccinated" hides vaccine injuries and creates a fake impression of efficacy. Mainstream media likely won't report on this.

@CraigKellyPHON - Craig Kelly

WHAT A SCAM Professor Norman Fenton exposes the fraud & statistical tricks used by the vaccine fanatics to falsely claim efficacy of the injections. The trick was to classify those injected within the previous 14-28 days as "unvaccinated". This way, those injured by the vaccine and report their injury 14-28 after being injected are falsely classified as "unvaccinated" - thereby hiding the cause of their injury and creating a fake impression of efficacy. Just another part of the Covid scam. Don’t expect Professor Fenton’s work to reported by the ABC or any other mainstream media. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378831039_The_extent_and_impact_of_vaccine_status_miscategorisation_on_covid-19_vaccine_efficacy_studies?channel=doi&linkId=65ec39adb7819b433bf1eeb2&showFulltext=true https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gkh6N-ZL3_k

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net
Saved - December 31, 2023 at 8:36 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) recorded the hottest days in NSW, including temperatures of 125°F (51.7°C) in Bourke on Jan 3, 1909. However, there are claims that the BOM has deleted these records due to opposition from the Climate Cult. The BOM also faced criticism for deleting the record of 50°C in Wilcannia on Jan 11, 1939. Despite efforts to find higher temperatures, no other 50°C+ temperatures have been recorded in NSW. This raises concerns about the accuracy of temperature measurements and the manipulation of historical records.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

The 3 hottest days officially recorded in NSW by the Bureau of Meteorology were; 🌞125°F (51.7°C) Bourke - 3rd Jan 1909 🌞124°F (51.1°C) White Cliffs - 10th Jan 1939 🌞123°F (50.6°C) Brewarrina - 3rd Jan 1909 Before the Covid madness I visited the National Archives and photographed the original handwritten observations before they disappeared down some memory hole. For as such temperatures are sacrilege to the Climate Cult, the BOM have conveniently deleted them from our history. https://jennifermarohasy.com/2020/07/hottest-day-ever-in-australia-confirmed-bourke-51-7c-3rd-january-1909/?fbclid=IwAR0l5eyPi_6fEmLe_QX-1ahaERSKTSVJOwJnJrdFJfUhZkQDJWd7PILDGxw The BOM currently list 50°C recorded at Wilcannia on the 11th Jan 1939 as NSW hottest, but this record was only restored after the BOM were caught red handed deleting it as well. https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/bom-temperature-records-for-nsw-completely-and-utterly-false-craig-kelly/video/27d70560a73df5b966b6aba1a40df699 And despite "global warming" and BOM’s best efforts by shrinking the size of the Stevenson Screens (from .23M3 to 0.06M3 (a trick known to measure 1°C hotter*) and placing 6 new weather stations in outback of NSW - they’ve yet to find another 50°C+ temperature in NSW As Orwell wrote; Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right. And that’s exactly where we are today with the BOM and the Climate Cult *https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/joc.4287 Impact of two different sized Stevenson screens on air temperature measurements

Hottest Day Ever in Australia Confirmed: Bourke 51.7°C, 3rd January 1909 - Jennifer Marohasy The Australian Bureau of Meteorology deleted what was long regarded as the hottest day ever recorded in Australia – Bourke’s 125°F (51.7°C) on the 3rd January 1909. This record* was deleted, falsely claiming that this was likely some sort of ‘observational error’, as no other official weather stations recorded high temperatures on that day. However, [...] jennifermarohasy.com
Sky News Australia Sky News Australia skynews.com.au
Saved - December 17, 2023 at 12:32 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The Australian National Clinical Evidence Taskforce's recommendation to consider Remdesivir for unvaccinated Covid patients raises questions about its safety and effectiveness. The Taskforce's handling of evidence on Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin throughout the pandemic is also concerning. These issues warrant a criminal investigation and the involvement of a Royal Commission.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

There should be a criminal investigation into the Australian National Evidence Taskforce. In May 2023 the Australian National Clinical Evidence Taskforce issued advice that Remdesivir (Run/death/is/near) be considered for unvaccinated Covid patients - but not for vaccinated patients If Remdesivir was "safe & effective" why recommend it only for the unvaccinated ? What clinical evidence did the Australian National Clinical Evidence Taskforce have for making such a recommendation ? Interesting questions that a Royal Commission should be asking. The Australian National Clinical Evidence Taskforce engaged in Malfeasance throughout the Covid period, continually ignoring evidence on Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. The only purpose for recommending Remdesivir to be pumped in the unvaccinated but not the vaccinated was to kill the unvaccinated so that the covid death numbers (vaccinated v. Unvaccinated) could be manipulated. There should be a criminal investigation into the Australian National Evidence Taskforce. h/t @RefugeOfSinner5 https://covid19evidence.net.au/wp-content/uploads/FLOWCHART-DT-FOR-ADULTS.pdf?=220802-53942

Domestic Air Freight Australia - covid19evidence.net.au Domestic air freight offers a comprehensive range of air freight services designed to meet the diverse needs of businesses operating within Australia. With our extensive network and dedicated team, we ensure your cargo reaches its destination swiftly and safely. Whether you require express delivery or cost-effective options, we have the expertise and resources to handle it efficiently. Partner with us for seamless logistics solutions and elevate your supply chain management. covid19evidence.net.au
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 8:44 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The author believes that there was a deliberate effort to discredit and destroy the effectiveness of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. They argue that acknowledging their effectiveness would have jeopardized the lucrative vaccine industry and exposed politicians as frauds.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

IVERMECTIN : FOLLOW THE MONEY They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. They didn’t care how many people they killed. Because if they had acknowledged that Ivermectin or HCQ was effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed. And the politicians that wanted to claim glory for "saving everyone" with a free injection would have been exposed as frauds.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, a group of doctors discuss the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Some doctors argue that Ivermectin is a safe and effective drug that has shown miraculous effectiveness in treating the virus. They cite studies and the endorsement of a senior immunologist to support their claims. However, other doctors disagree, stating that the studies are still undergoing peer review and that Ivermectin is not an approved treatment for COVID-19. They argue that the vaccines have emergency use authorization because there are no approved alternatives. The debate centers around the effectiveness and credibility of Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before. Speaker 1: So it was the first time in history that we ever saw a doctor who could be prosecuted for using a generic, safe, and effective drug for the application that doctor thought was appropriate. Speaker 0: My group of 5, the core 5 of us ICU doctors, collectively, were some of the most highly published doctors in the history of critical care medicine. Paul Maric is the most published practicing intensivist in the world. Speaker 1: As we sit here today. I'm the most published person in my field in history. Speaker 2: To this because I mean, you're the only person saying this. We've got a listen to our doctors and our scientists. Speaker 3: So Ivermectin is a drug which has been dispensed 3,700,000,000 times. It's changed the face of parasitic diseases on this planet. It's probably the 2nd most important drug ever invented. It is very safe. It's very cheap, And it's highly effective against SARS CoV 2. Speaker 2: I don't even wanna get into this because, I mean, you're the only person saying this. We've gotta listen to our doctors And our scientists Speaker 4: I am a physician and a man of science. I have done nothing nothing but commit myself to scientific truth And the care of patients. Many that I wanna talk about. And I wanna talk about that we have a solution to this crisis. There is a drug that is proving to be of miraculous impact. And when I say miracle, I do not use that term lightly. And I don't wanna be sensationalized when I say that. That is a scientific recommendation based on mountains of data that has emerged in the last 3 months. Mountains of data have emerged from all from many centers and countries around the world showing the miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin. It basically obliterates transmission of this virus. Speaker 5: Well, firstly, what you said there is incorrect. Now if you only pick up today's papers, the Sydney Morning Herald, Australia's most senior immunologist, Emeritus professor Robert Clancy, Someone that was actually awarded an order of Australia for his services to immunology and medicine. He has said, and I quote, Craig Kelly is absolutely right. Now that's our most senior immunologist. So the idea that, I'm, I completely and utterly reject the idea That I'm out there putting any theories forward. I'm not putting any theories forward at all. Now, yes, some of the studies that I've posted are still undergoing peer review, But many of them have actually been through the peer review process. In fact, I would say the majority of the studies that I've posted have been through the peer reviewed process. And just because something I'm sorry. If that Speaker 2: is just not true, Craig. Speaker 0: I mean, one of the studies you've worked Speaker 2: it's a Bangladeshi plastic surgeon. I would like to take my medical advice from someone who is knowledgeable in infectious diseases is an epidemiologist. Speaker 5: Well, that's all. You should listen Speaker 2: to that. Speaker 0: In other cases, Speaker 5: you should listen to professor Robert Clancy. He's the most senior credentialed immunologist in this country. So that's who I believe we should be listening to. And he is he has said, like, I'll quote exactly What he's wrote Speaker 0: You've just you've already quoted it, Craig. No. Speaker 5: I haven't. I he also said it. I thought this is very important. He said, from uncertain beginnings, An impressive database has more recently been accumulated that strongly supports the use of hydroxychloroquine and or Ivermectin. Their use in concert with the vaccine, so this is not an anti vaxx position. You know, when the use in concert with the vaccines can no longer be denied. In fact, this is the only science based opinion. Now they're not my words. From Speaker 0: That's not my study. You're Speaker 2: referring to. Speaker 0: That's another study you're referring Speaker 2: to because Speaker 0: this is Speaker 5: important. Study. You are misrepresenting what I'm saying. What I'm what I'm No. No. No. But Speaker 2: I did my research, Craig, Speaker 0: as you asked us Speaker 2: to do. Speaker 4: You need to listen for a moment. Speaker 5: But hang on. Speaker 2: Look at that. Is a wonderful drug. You're right. If you have scabies or river blindness Speaker 5: You obviously haven't read. I'm sorry. You are not listening to our you've gotta listen to the science. You've gotta listen Speaker 6: to a doctor. Speaker 4: Are you a scientist? Speaker 2: Are you a scientist, Craig? I'm not. Speaker 5: I am not. I have just quoted the senior immunologist in this country, The most high as credentialed immunologist in this country. Now are you saying that he's wrong? Speaker 7: For the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people Speaker 4: die. Speaker 6: From the FDA, emergency use authorization of medical products related authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, Preventing or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the US. Speaker 8: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then The logic supporting universal vaccination with largely experimental products is no longer supportable.
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 6:02 PM

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

The masked and injected were more likely to contract Covid.

@FactsMatterRB - Facts Matter

A new study out of Norway bears bad news for mask-wearers. The peer-reviewed study found people who wore face masks were more likely to contract 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗 than people who didn't. https://t.co/bPb1XVvL3T

Video Transcript AI Summary
A peer-reviewed study from Norway analyzed the mask usage of over 3,200 individuals. After following them for 17 days, researchers found that those who wore masks more frequently had a higher incidence of testing positive for COVID-19. Adjusting for factors like vaccination status and gender, the study revealed that people who always or almost always wore masks were 40% more likely to catch COVID-19 compared to those who never wore masks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This peer reviewed study right here which came out of Norway, it was published in the pages of a journal called Epidemiology and Infection. And in this study, Norwegian researchers were analyzing the mask usage of a little over 3,200 people in their country. And once an individual signed up for the study, they were followed for a period of about 17 days and then subsequently they were asked about their personal usage of masks. And what these researchers found was that there was a higher incidence of being tested positive for COVID among the people who wore masks more frequently. Now when these researchers went back, crunched the numbers and adjusted the data based on several different factors such as vaccination status, sex, gender, and so on, they found that people who almost always or always wore masks were 40% more likely to catch COVID versus people who never wore masks at all.
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 7:30 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Greens Senator Faruqi accuses Australia of "criminal inaction" and demands reparations. However, her assertion of melting glaciers washing away villages seems misleading. Pakistan's life expectancy has nearly doubled since 1950. Australia's contribution to global CO2 emissions is only around 1.2%. Climate crisis claims are baseless.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

WHOSE SIDE IS SHE ON ? Greens Senator Faruqi accuses Australia of "criminal inaction" and demands Australians pay her homeland "reparations". Meanwhile, Pakistan has enjoyed an almost doubling of life expectancy since 1950. And in Faruqi’s assertion of "melting glaciers washing away entire villages" - she appears to have misled Parliament, as media reports indicate this is not something that has actually happened - but something that threatens it might happen. https://www.rferl.org/a/pakistan-mountain-villages-floods-melting-glaciers/32696883.html And although her claims of a climate crisis are a complete nonsense, Australia only emits around 1.2% of global man-made CO2.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I recently visited Pakistan and witnessed the devastating impact of Australia's inaction on climate change. The extreme heat, melting glaciers, and destruction of entire villages are all direct consequences of this negligence. The children in Pakistan are suffering from the deadly combination of intense heat and trapped pollution. It is crucial for us to acknowledge the harm caused by Australia's contribution to the climate crisis and take steps to provide reparations to the countries in the global south that are most affected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've just returned from Pakistan after seeing my army. Australia's criminal inaction on climate is deeply felt there, felt in the extreme heat, felt in the melting glaciers, washing away entire villages, and felt in the everyday life of children in Pakistan who are suffocating in an ever deadly mix of intense heat and trapped pollution. So we must remember also to lift our gaze. We must start a process of making climate reparations to the global south countries who are most harmed by Australia's contribution to the climate crisis.
Pakistan's Mountain Villages In Danger As Melting Glaciers Threaten Floods With 800,000 people living less than 15 kilometers from a glacier, Pakistan is one of the most vulnerable nations in the world to glacial lake floods. A project funded by the United Nations aims to assist populations downstream of melting glaciers. rferl.org
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 6:29 PM

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

☠️SPIKEVAX THAT BODY☠️ https://t.co/mLn0S96HyD

Saved - November 22, 2023 at 6:17 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
A top epidemiologist warns of a dramatic rise in cancers worldwide, possibly linked to the Covid vaccines. The immune system dysregulation caused by the genetic-based injections may be accelerating the growth of cancers that would normally be kept in check. While it may take years for cancer to manifest, blood-related disorders and rapidly emerging cancers are already being observed. The long-term effects of the vaccines on cancer rates are yet to be fully understood.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

After injecting the majority of the world’s population with a novel & experimental genetic agent that had zero long-term safety data, this is absolutely frightening. We can only pray they are wrong. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/top-doctor-warns-turbo-cancers-caused-by-mrna-are-set-to-kill-billions/ A top epidemiologist is raising the alarm over soaring rates of cancers, which he warns are spreading “dramatically” around the world. http://Slaynews.com reports: According to Risch and other leading cancer specialists, cases of this new phenomenon have risen rapidly in the past two years. “These cancers that normally would be kept in check by the body are unexpectedly growing very quickly,” Risch explained in a recent interview with The Epoch Times. “We know that the Covid vaccines have done various degrees of damage to the immune system in a fraction of people who’ve taken them. “And that damage could be anywhere from getting Covid more often, getting other infectious diseases, and perhaps it may also be cancer in the longer term,” he warned. Risch is not alone in his concern, however. Many leading doctors, including renowned pathologist Ryan Cole, have been sounding the alarm about “turbo cancers.” “Because of the dysregulation of the immune responses and the suppression of the immune system by these genetic-based injections … these cancers that normally would be kept in check by the body are unexpectedly growing very quickly,” Dr. Cole previously warned during an interview with Children’s Health Defense. But the worst may be yet to come, Risch forewarns. “The idea that a new product like the [COVID] vaccines could cause cancer is not something that’s going to be observable overnight,” he explains. “Cancer as a disease takes a long time to manifest itself from when it starts, from the first cells that go haywire until they grow to be large enough to be diagnosed or to be symptomatic, can take anywhere from two or three years for the blood cancers, like leukemias and lymphomas, to five years for lung cancer, to 20 years for bladder cancer, or 30, 35 years for colon cancer, and so on.” “So these are long-term events, and if you suddenly introduce a new product like the vaccines, the first thing you might expect to see would be the blood cancers that I mentioned but not the other kinds of cancers.” Nevertheless, rises in blood-related disorders are already showing up in official government data. Data analyst Edward Dowd shed light on yearly UK PIP clearances (payments) by body system earlier this year. Dowd’s analysis examines different metrics for 2020, 2021, and 2022. The highly respected data expert found was hematological (blood-related) claims were up a staggering 522% above the trend in 2022. It’s not just blood-related disorders that are soaring, however. Cancers that normally take ten, twenty, or thirty years to develop, are rapidly emerging in patients. Risch asserts that Covid shots are causing the body’s immune system to “go haywire.” He says that cancers are being theoretically sped up by immune-suppressing MRNA shots. Cancers that previously took years to develop could now surface at increased rates in the long term, Risch indicated. But we’re already seeing signs of this happening as young people.

Top Doctor Warns ‘Cancers’ Are Spreading ‘Dramatically’: ‘This Is Not Normal’ - The People's Voice A top epidemiologist is raising the alarm over soaring rates of cancers, which he warns are spreading “dramatically” around the world. thepeoplesvoice.tv
Home - Slay News Breaking News October 30, 2023 – 3:12 pm 13-Year-Old Shot Dead after Trying to Carjack Armed Federal Security Officer in D.C October 30, 2023 – 2:26 pm Federal Judge Issues Order Blocking Biden Admin from Destroying Texas Border Fence October 30, 2023 – 1:45 pm Welsh Government Redefines Legal Definition of ‘Women’ to Include Men […] slaynews.com
Saved - November 21, 2023 at 3:47 AM

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

Or perhaps it was some new technique of administrating an injection. And then these politicians mandated other Australians to get a real injection.

@DrWoofAus - Dr Woof 🐭🦊

That time @AnnastaciaMP faked getting #COVID-19 “vaccine” on television. #Queensland should remember this along with all other tyrannical measures during #COVID19 in upcoming elections. “🎵 Australians let us rejoice in corruption and useful idiots 🎵” https://t.co/Jr40JQAiC1

Saved - November 15, 2023 at 11:10 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
In Nov 2023, some low-information voters still believe "all medical practitioners" dismiss Ivermectin's effectiveness against Covid. ABC and others spread propaganda, hiding the fact that thousands of doctors worldwide successfully use Ivermectin to treat Covid.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

It’s amazing that in Nov 2023 that there are still low-information voters left who believe that "all the medical practitioners in the world" say that Ivermectin has no effect on Covid. But given the propaganda and misinformation peddled by the ABC and other stooges of Big Pharma, it shouldn’t be a surprise. For if you obtained your information primarily from the ABC, you’d have no idea that thousands of medical practitioners around the world are successfully using Ivermectin to treat Covid.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin is a widely used and safe drug that has been effective against SARS CoV 2. It could have saved many lives if it had been used more widely. Doctors who tried to use it faced prosecution, despite its safety and effectiveness. One doctor worked 715 continuous days without a day off because no one else wanted to care for indigent patients. The doctor's hospital had a low mortality rate compared to the rest of the country, thanks to protocols that included Ivermectin. However, the media ignored their success and the use of repurposed drugs. The doctor faced censorship on social media platforms for mentioning Ivermectin. The FDA claims there are no adequate alternatives to the vaccines, but many believe unnecessary deaths occurred due to censorship and lack of access to Ivermectin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Ivermectin is a drug which has been dispensed 3,700,000,000 times. It's changed the face of parasitic diseases on this planet. It's probably the 2nd most important drug ever invented. It is very safe. It's very cheap, and is highly effective against SARS CoV 2. And if this drug had been used more widely in this country, it could have saved 100 of thousands of lives. And we know that that's what's happened in many other countries across the world, that Ivermectin is a life saving drug for SARS CoV 2, and it's probably one of the safest medications on this planet. You are more likely to die from taking Tylenol than Ivermectin, yet the FDA calls this a dangerous horse Deworming medicine. Speaker 1: What So it was the first time in history that we ever saw a doctor who could be prosecuted for using a generic, safe, and effective drug for the application that doctor thought was appropriate. Speaker 2: My group of 5, the core 5 of us ISU doctors, collectively were some of the most highly published doctors in the history of critical care medicine. Paul Maric is the most published practicing intensivist in the world. Speaker 0: For the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people Day. Speaker 3: In my institution, I was the only doctor working in the COVID unit. I had a lot of, assistance helping me, but No other doctor wanted to come into the unit to the point that I worked 715 continuous days without a single day off. Speaker 0: Run that by me again. How Speaker 2: many days? Speaker 3: 715 days. Just imagine that. I mean, not even when I was an intern, I worked 715 Continuously. But I, you know, I couldn't get sick. I wouldn't couldn't take a day off because nobody wanted to care for these people. Because these were, like I said, indigent people, People that have no papers. Speaker 2: And I'll just mention indigent because I think that's the term a lot of people don't know. The people these are people that could be on the street, People are in really rough time in their life. Correct. Speaker 3: I mean, these are people that have no resources. And remember, by the time they came to me, they were very sick because What was happening at the time is there were 3 reasons why people didn't wanna come to the hospital. One was they thought that if they came to a hospital, they were gonna die in the hospital. 2nd one, they they they thought that if they came to a hospital because many of them were illegal aliens, they were gonna be deported. And the third Fair warning, many came to the hospital. They didn't want to come in because they were concerned of the financial burden that that has on them. So by the time they came to me, they were literally critically ill. These were people that were the sickest of the sick that you can imagine. Speaker 2: And you managed to save a lot of lives. Speaker 3: I did my very best to save a lot of lives with with what I had. And we were working on a variety of different guidelines and protocols to be able to help these people. So we started doing that. And our success was unreal. I mean, we started using the math plus protocol, using cortisone like agents, Vitamin c, repurposed drugs like Ivermectin, and my mortality data show that My patients in my hospital had a mortality of about 4.4%, when the rest of the country was in the 25% to 40%. And our success was unreal. I mean, we started using the math plus protocol, you know, using cortisone like agents, vitamin C, Repurposed drugs like Ivermectin and my mortality data show that my patients in my hospital had a mortality of about four 0.4%, when the rest of the country was in the 25 to 40%. So that attracted a lot of patients from all over the world To that little hospital in Northern is Houston. So we will have patients being flown in, in air ambulances. I mean, we had a lot of International attention. I mean, every single news agency came to look at our hospital. But interestingly enough, they would talk about, You know what was going on with COVID, but they would never talk about what we were doing. They never talked about the MathPlus Protocol. They never Talked about, you know, our success rate or more importantly, the use of repurposed drugs like Ivermectin. Unfortunately, people like me We're censored over and over again. Speaker 4: Science based opinion. Now they're not my That's Speaker 2: not my Speaker 4: that's my Speaker 2: hand. That's my That's not my theory. You're referring to. Listen. Listen. That's the study you're referring to because Speaker 3: this is Speaker 4: important. Study. You are misrepresenting what I'm saying. What What I Speaker 2: did is I did my research, Craig, as you asked us to do. You need to listen for Speaker 4: a moment. Speaker 0: But hang on. Speaker 4: Look at this. Speaker 2: Is a wonderful drug. You are right. If you have Gabies or river blindness? Speaker 4: You obviously haven't read. I'm sorry. You are not listening to our you've got to listen to the science. You've got to listen to our Speaker 2: Are you a scientist? Are you a scientist, Craig? I'm not. Speaker 4: I am not. I have just quoted the senior immunologist in this country, the most highest credentialed immunologist in this country. Now are you saying that he's wrong? Speaker 3: Every single news agency came to look at our hospital. But interestingly enough, They would talk about, you know, what was going on with COVID, but they would never talk about what we were doing. They never talked about the MathPlus protocol. They never talked about, you know, our success rate or, more importantly, the use of repurposed drugs like Ivermectin. Unfortunately, people like me were censored over and over again. Every time I would put anything that had remotely the word ivermectin on any post that I did, I would go into what I call Facebook jail, and I became the king of a Facebook jail because they kept on on banning me. The same was true with Twitter, and the same was true with YouTube. So, unfortunately, I truly believe that a lot of people died unnecessarily because of that censorship that we Speaker 5: From the FDA, emergency use authorization of medical products and related authorities. For the FDA To issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorisation in the

@ijwilkins5 - Ian Wilkins

@JessieG05894984 @CKellyUAP Have you got a sick horse. Craig Kelly must be a fucking absolute genius who knows more than all the medical practitioners in the world and the FDA. So if you have worms or head lice or rosacea then yes use ivermectin https://t.co/bh0oS5HmNI

Saved - November 12, 2023 at 4:16 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Pfizer's share price has plummeted by 21% since the start of the Covid pandemic, despite their significant revenue from Covid mRNA injections and the anti-viral pill, Paxlovid. The market perceives Pfizer's Covid vaccine as a liability due to potential compensation claims and legal consequences. The company may face billions in damages for the harm caused by their experimental injections, while senior executives could potentially face jail time.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

PFIZER : THE MARKET KNOWS WHAT’S COMING Covid was first detected in Wuhan in November 2019, reaching 60 cases by 20 December that year. On that very same day Pfizer’s share price closed at $37.16 However, despite the tens billions Pfizer has pocketed in revenue from their Covid mRNA injections and their Covid anti-viral pill, Paxlovid - Pfizer’s share price has crashed to close last Friday at just $29.48 That’s incredibly 21% lower than at the start of Covid. And the reason is simple, despite the die-hard fanatics still clinging to "safe & effective" - the market knows that Pfizer’s covid vaccine is a toxic dangerous product, that is not an asset to the company - but a liability with Pfizer facing paying untold billions in compensation to those their experimental injections have damaged & killed and many of its senior executives are potentially facing lengthy terms in jail.

Saved - November 9, 2023 at 10:07 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Dr. Karen DeVore testified in South Carolina, highlighting her use of Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. Regrettably, politicians attacked these treatments, resulting in unnecessary loss of life. Their ignorance and political games have dire consequences.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

HOW MANY LIVES COULD HAVE BEEN SAVED ? Dr. Karen DeVore testifying before the South Carolina Senate about her use of Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. The sorry excuses for humans, the low-life politicians that played politics and ignorantly stood up and attacked Hydroxychloroquine & Ivermectin in the Parliament all have blood in their hands.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Karen DeVore, a dermatologist in South Carolina. I've been prescribing hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin for over 30 years, off-label. In 2020, the FDA called Ivermectin horse medicine and doctors couldn't prescribe it. I knew these drugs were safe and effective, and I saw great results in my patients. None of the patients I treated with these drugs were hospitalized or died from COVID. They had no side effects and felt better within hours. It's frustrating that insurance companies and pharmacies denied access to these drugs. Even terminally ill patients on ventilators couldn't try them. How many lives could have been saved?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I'm gonna try to make this personal. My name is Karen DeVore. I have been practicing dermatology in Spartanburg, South Carolina for over 30 years. I have a high volume practice. I see about 50 patients a day. I have been prescribing hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. They've been safe. They've been effective. They've been affordable, and I've been prescribing them for over 30 years. Every time I've written the drug for 30 years, it was off label. I have not treated malaria in the state of South Carolina nor river blindness in the state of South Carolina. So Why? I mean, I had no pushback from pharmacies or insurance companies for 30 years. Everything I did was technically off label. Why in 2020, all of a sudden, the FDA was calling Ivermectin horse medicine? Physicians were not allowed to write the medicine? Pharmacists would not fill it for you? You know, where were the FDA, CDC, medical boards, pharmaceutical boards to to be truth tellers in all this? Because I had a long experience writing these safe and affordable drugs. And I knew that there were trials that showed in SARS CoV one, And I knew we had no FDA approved early interventions. Patients were basically told I mean, they weren't even seen by a lot of their primary care doctors. They were basically told to go home, and if you can't breathe and you turn blue, go to the emergency room, and then we'll give you Remdesivir and maybe put you on a ventilator. And this was occurring why many doctors across the United States and other countries were having great results with repurposed drugs, hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. I was noticing that my long term patients on hydroxychloroquine for autoimmune diseases like lupus, They were not getting COVID in 2020. So I began writing, Ivermectin for COVID 19 patients almost immediately. To my knowledge, not a single patient that I treated with Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine was hospitalized or died from COVID. Not only were there 0 side effects, patients amazed me. They called me back. They told me how overnight, They felt normal again. Within 8 hours, their fever was broken. Their rigors were gone. It was unbelievable. If I had not been witnessing such impressive clinical results, I don't think I would have continued to fight for my patients with the insurance companies and the pharmacies. Why would you deny this for anyone? So why wouldn't you try writing these drugs? Why wouldn't you do vitamin g and zinc? What did you have to lose? And, really, ironically, Somebody already alluded to this. South Carolina has a right to tri state. But because these drugs were already FDA approved for human use, Even a terminally ill patient on a ventilator at the end of life was not allowed to try these drugs. How many lives could have been saved?
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 1:00 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
A new study, peer-reviewed and published, reveals that Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) saved lives in the treatment of COVID-19. The study found significantly lower mortality rates among patients who received HCQ + AZ compared to those who didn't. The authors argue that interference from government officials prevented HCQ from being more widely used. They call for resignations and apologies from individuals who opposed HCQ, including government officials, media organizations, and medical professionals. The study adds to the growing evidence supporting the effectiveness of HCQ in saving lives.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

🔥BREAKING: New just published study proves Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was saving lives. Game, set & match. The largest single-center study evaluating HCQ-AZ in the treatment of 30,423 COVID patients has been peer-reviewed and just published. The study found; 4.89% of Covid patients that didn’t receive HCQ + AZ died (344/7,030) while only 0.82% of Covid patients that received HCQ + AZ died (192/23,172) For hospitalised patients; 16.28% that didn’t receive HCQ +AZ died (327/2,008) 7.11% that did receive HCQ + AZ died (180/2,530) And for Outpatients 0.59% that didn’t receive HCQ + AZ died (31/5,282) 0.10% that did receive HCQ + AZ died (21/21,135) The abstract notes; After adjustment for sex, age, period, and patient management, HCQ-AZ was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.55, 95% CI 0.45–0.68). The study concluded that if not for the interference of government bureaucrats and politicians "that HCQ would have saved lives" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297523001075#:~:text=Of%20the%2030%2C202%20patients%20for,CI%2C%200.14–0.19). In light of this study, the largest single-center study evaluating HCQ-AZ in the treatment of COVID-19, together with other large observational studies showing clearly that HCQ + AZ saved lives; 💥The Governor of Queensland, Janette Young (who made it a criminal offence -6 months jail - for a doctor to prescribe HCQ) must resign and apologise for her conduct, which this study shows cost Australian lives. 💥The Chief Medical Office of Australia, Paul Kelly must resign and apologise for his repeated statements against HCQ 💥Anthony Albanese and Chris ‘blackout’ Bowen (who both mocked HCQ on the floor of the Australia Parliament) must make a special apology to the nation at the next sitting of Parliament. 💥The Australian Communications Media Authority (ACMA) chief executive, Creina Chapman must apologise for asserting my posts on HCQ should be "taken down". She should also admit her organisation is completely incapable of being the arbiters of truth and deciding what is and isn’t "misinformation" https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/sep/16/liberal-mp-craig-kellys-hydroxychloroquine-claims-should-be-removed-from-social-media-regulator-says And here’s a partial list of few others that need to apologise for their ignorance, stupidity & politicised groupthink on HCQ that contributed to the deaths of Australians denied access to HCQ; ❌Dr. Coatsworth https://7news.com.au/politics/medico-rejects-virus-claims-by-liberal-mp-c-1274197 https://www.health.gov.au/resources/foi-disclosure-log/foi-1993-release-documents-covid-19-briefing-notes-cmo-or-dcmo-regarding-craig-kelly-mp-and-hydroxychloroquine https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/2020/08/31/craig-kelly-medical-officers-hydroxychloroquine ❌The Sydney Morning Herald https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/craig-kelly-accused-of-pushing-dangerous-covid-19-conspiracy-theory-20200827-p55pw4.html ❌The Age - Noel Towell & Kishor Napier Raman https://www.theage.com.au/cbd/craig-kelly-s-quacks-land-in-australia-with-covid-cure-20230131-p5cgus.html ❌News..com https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/liberal-backbencher-craig-kelly-slammed-for-antimalaria-drug-rant/news-story/270cb1f28dfe7e8e166c85de72c84296 ❌ABC Fact-check https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-23/coronacheck-craig-kelly-george-christensen-hydroxychloroquine/12802672 ❌National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/clinical/do-not-use-hydroxychloroquine-for-covid-national-t https://www.sbs.com.au/news/the-feed/article/liberal-mp-says-doctors-should-be-given-choice-over-issuing-controversial-drug-to-covid-19-patients/tf0anl2bi ❌Alison Langdon https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9216405/Allison-Langdon-puts-Covid-19-conspiracy-theorist-Craig-Kelly.html ❌Tania Plibersek https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/feb/02/liberal-backbencher-craig-kelly-will-wait-to-see-the-evidence-before-getting-covid-vaccine ❌Crikey https://www.crikey.com.au/2021/01/13/craig-kelly-covid-19-disinformation/ ❌2GB - Ray Hadley https://www.2gb.com/gps-join-barrage-against-silly-craig-kellys-coronavirus-comments/ ❌Royal Australian College of General Practitioners NSW/ACT Chair Dr Charlotte Hespe https://www.2gb.com/gps-join-barrage-against-silly-craig-kellys-coronavirus-comments/ ❌The Australian Financial Review https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/skimpy-studies-fuelling-craig-kelly-s-health-posts-20210113-p56ts0 ❌Mark Butler - Minister for Health https://markbutler.net.au/news/media-releases/craig-kelly-s-dangerous-misinformation/ ❌Scott Morrison https://thewest.com.au/news/coronavirus/scott-morrison-demands-craig-kelly-stop-sharing-covid-conspiracies-ng-b881786233z ❌RACGP President Dr Karen Price https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/professional/racgp-president-calls-out-rogue-mp-over-covid-misi ❌Tim Watts MP https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=826133814803430 ❌Junkee - Rachel Conaghan https://junkee.com/craig-kelly-hydroxychloroquine/264559 ❌The Greens https://greens.org.au/news/media-release/craig-kelly-should-be-booted-his-cushy-23k-committee-role ❌MediaWatch https://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/episodes/hyrdoxy/12190376 ❌The TGA https://www.tga.gov.au/news/safety-alerts/new-restrictions-prescribing-hydroxychloroquine-covid-19

Outcomes after early treatment with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: An analysis of a database of 30,423 COVID-19 patients Many studies have evaluated the use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19. Most retrospective observational studies demonstrate a benefit of using HCQ on … sciencedirect.com
Liberal MP Craig Kelly's hydroxychloroquine claims should be removed from social media, regulator says ACMA says social media companies would be expected to remove harmful material about health under proposed codes of conduct theguardian.com
Medico rejects virus claims by Liberal MP Deputy chief medical officer Nick Coatsworth says a treatment spruiked by a Liberal MP is not effective in dealing with coronavirus. 7news.com.au
FOI 1993 – release documents – COVID-19 Briefing notes CMO or DCMO regarding Craig Kelly MP and hydroxychloroquine. This FOR request is for emails and briefing notes to or from the CMO or DCMO regarding Liberal MP Craig Kelly and the drug hydroxychloroquine. health.gov.au
Craig Kelly slammed after attack on top doctors over hydroxychloroquine Labor has attacked Health Minister Greg Hunt, after Liberal backbencher Craig Kelly claimed a top doctor "misled" Australians about coronavirus. thenewdaily.com.au
Craig Kelly accused of pushing 'dangerous' COVID-19 conspiracy theory The Morrison government has refused to publicly rebuke Liberal MP Craig Kelly for attacking the ban on the controversial COVID-19 treatment hydroxychloroquine. smh.com.au
Craig Kelly’s ‘quacks’ land in Australia with COVID ‘cure’ A series of conferences put on by Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party will feature some controversial overseas talent. theage.com.au
Liberal MP slammed for anti-malaria drug rant Liberal backbencher Craig Kelly has gone on an online rant about anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine. news.com.au
We fact checked Craig Kelly and George Christensen on hydroxychloroquine. Here's what we found Federal Coalition backbenchers Craig Kelly and George Christensen have sent an open letter to Queensland's Chief Health Officer in support of hydroxychloroquine. What's the latest on its efficacy as a COVID-19 treatment? abc.net.au
newsGP - Do not use hydroxychloroquine for COVID: National Taskforce The strengthened recommendation stems from studies that show a lack of efficacy and potential harmful side effects. www1.racgp.org.au
Liberal MP says doctors should be given choice over issuing controversial drug to COVID-19 patients The federal member for Hughes, Craig Kelly, told The Feed that doctors should be given the choice to prescribe hydroxychloroquine -- a controversial anti-malaria drug -- to patients with COVID-19. But medical experts said the drug is ineffective in treating the virus and has harmful side effects. sbs.com.au
Allison Langdon puts down Covid-19 conspiracy theorist Craig Kelly Mr Kelly has caused outrage over the past few months by promoting unproven drugs to treat Covid-19 and calling into the question the safety of vaccines. dailymail.co.uk
Liberal backbencher Craig Kelly will 'wait to see the evidence' before getting Covid vaccine The outspoken MP believes Australia’s medical experts are not up to speed on the latest treatments theguardian.com
We regret to report that Craig Kelly MP is at it again Walking embarrassment generator Craig Kelly has dedicated himself to COVID-19 misinformation. Don't expect his bosses to call him out. crikey.com.au
GPs join barrage against 'silly' Craig Kelly's coronavirus comments Craig Kelly is now receiving criticism on all sides for pushing comments suggesting hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin could be used to treat coronavirus.  These claims, based on “inconclusive studies”, are contrary to medical advice and are feared to be undermining public confidence in the Morrison government’s vaccine rollout. Mr Kelly clashed with senior Labor MP Tanya […] 2gb.com
GPs join barrage against 'silly' Craig Kelly's coronavirus comments Craig Kelly is now receiving criticism on all sides for pushing comments suggesting hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin could be used to treat coronavirus.  These claims, based on “inconclusive studies”, are contrary to medical advice and are feared to be undermining public confidence in the Morrison government’s vaccine rollout. Mr Kelly clashed with senior Labor MP Tanya […] 2gb.com
Skimpy studies fuelling Craig Kelly's health posts Backbench MP facing a growing backlash over his social media use, with former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull urging senior ministers to call him out. afr.com
Mark Butler MP > CRAIG KELLY’S DANGEROUS MISINFORMATION Minister for Health and Aged Care. Federal Member for Hindmarsh. markbutler.net.au
PM demands rogue MP stop sharing COVID conspiracies Liberal MP Craig Kelly has been slammed for his “crazy conspiracies”, such as spruiking hydroxychloroquine as a possible treatment for COVID-19. thewest.com.au
newsGP - RACGP President calls out rogue MP over COVID misinformation UPDATED: Dr Karen Price has condemned Federal MP Craig Kelly’s appearance on a podcast hosted by ‘disgraced former celebrity chef’ Pete Evans. www1.racgp.org.au
1.8K views · 83 reactions | The latest Trump impersonation by Craig Kelly | If only the Prime Minister would join us “brainwashed Hydroxychloroquine deniers” and pull Craig Kelly into line on his dangerous spreading of... | By Tim Watts MP | Facebook If only the Prime Minister would join us “brainwashed Hydroxychloroquine deniers” and pull Craig Kelly into line on his dangerous spreading of... facebook.com
This Liberal MP Is Obsessed With Hydroxychloroquine, The Drug Loved By Conspiracy Theorists Craig Kelly is calling for Premier Daniel Andrews to be jailed over the ban on hydroxychloroquine, a drug conspiracy theorists think cures COVID-19 junkee.com
Craig Kelly should be booted off his cushy $23k committee role | Australian Greens The Greens have called upon the Prime Minister to boot Craig Kelly from his role chairing a parliamentary committee, following weeks of disinformation intended to undermine the medical response to coronavirus. greens.org.au
Ep 12 - Hydroxychloroquine disappoints - Media Watch Disappointing results for malaria drug hydroxychloroquine which has been favoured by Donald Trump and some in the media as a possible treatment for coronavirus. abc.net.au
New restrictions on prescribing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 Only certain types of specialists will be able to prescribe hydroxychloroquine to new patients tga.gov.au
Saved - November 2, 2023 at 9:42 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The Australian government spent $8 billion on 264.3 million COVID vaccines, ensuring 10 shots per person in the country's population of 26.5 million. This information was confirmed by the Australian National Audit Office and approved by the TGA. Source: https://www.anao.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-10/Auditor-General_Report_2022-23_3_0.pdf

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

COVID CRAZINESS : Morrison Government ordered 10 shots each for every man, women & child - at a cost of $8 billion Australia’s population was 26,473,055 at 31 March 2023. The Australian National Audit Office has confirmed that Australian government ordered 264,300,000 Covid vaccines at a cost of more than $8,000,000,000 that were approved by the TGA. https://www.anao.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-10/Auditor-General_Report_2022-23_3_0.pdf

Saved - October 30, 2023 at 5:01 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Injecting more increases infection risk. Workplace vaccine mandates were human rights abuses and led to Covid hotspots. #NoMoreMandates #CovidRisk

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

THE MORE YOU INJECT, THE MORE YOU INFECT Dr. Charles Hoff : The more you are injected, the greater chance you have of getting Covid and the greater chance you have of spreading it. Workplace Vaccine mandates weren’t only human rights abuses, they made those workplaces more likely to be Covid hotspots.

Saved - October 29, 2023 at 7:39 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Scott Galloway and others disregarded science and data on vaccine safety and effectiveness. They attacked those questioning Pfizer's trials and the risks of injecting children with an experimental genetic agent. They ignored principles like "first do no harm" and "informed consent." They spread misinformation and silenced truth-tellers. They politicized treatment and denied access to medicines. Their actions caused harm, injury, and death. They don't deserve forgiveness; they should be held accountable.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

NO AMNESTY So marketing "genius" and vaccine propagandist Scott Galloway wants "forgiveness" because he was operating with "imperfect information". Bullsh*t The likes of Galloway ignored the science and ignored the data that showed the vaccines were neither safe nor effective. They vilified, abused and ridiculed those that raised legitimate questions about Pfizer’s fraudulent trials and the wisdom of injecting children with an experimental genetic agent that had zero long term safety data. His ilk were so arrogant & as they believed they were so enlightened, that principles developed over centuries such as "first do no harm" - "free & informed consent" - "the precautionary principle" and "free speech" could be jettisoned. The fact that they were operating under "imperfect information" was the very reason that the "precautionary principle" should have applied. They spread misinformation while demanding those telling the truth be censored. They ignored hard won human rights safe-guards and selfishly demanded others be forced to undergo experimental medical interventions because he thought it would protect them. They politicised early treatment, and denied sick people access to medicines. They harmed children with their zealotry, fanaticism, politics, wilful ignorance and groupthink. And they kept pressing on, causing harm, injury & death - even when they knew they were wrong. They‘ve forfeited all rights to "grace and forgiveness" - they belong in jail.

Video Transcript AI Summary
During COVID, I was on the board of my kids' school and initially supported a strict lockdown policy. However, I now realize that keeping kids out of school for longer had a greater negative impact than the risks. We all operated with imperfect information, including myself, the CDC, and the governor. Let's learn from this and hold each other accountable while showing grace and forgiveness. Unfortunately, about 1 in 5 US adults are unwilling to get vaccinated, making them the global runner-up in vaccine hesitancy. This means roughly 56 million Americans are 11 times more likely to die from COVID than the rest of the population. It's embarrassing that some Americans are playing Russian roulette with their lives and the lives of others. Despite this, America's healthcare response to COVID has been a victory, thanks to the vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: While I was on the board of my kids' school during COVID, I wanted a harsher lockdown policy, and in retrospect, I was wrong. The damage to kids of keeping them out of school longer was greater than the risks. But here's the bottom line: myself, our great people the CDC I'd like to thank the governor we were all operating with imperfect information and we were doing our best let's learn from it. Let's hold each other accountable. But let's bring a little bit of grace and forgiveness. Share the population that is unwilling to get vaccinated. Is now the global runner-up in vaccine hesitancy. Or as I like to think of it, the silver medalist in the Head Up Your Ass competition. Nearly 1 in 5 US adults Report they're unwilling to get a vaccine, coming in 2nd just behind Mother Russia. That makes roughly 56,000,000 Americans 11 times more likely to die from COVID than the rest of the population. In other words, some Americans have decided to play, wait for it, Russian roulette, not only with their own lives, but with other people's lives. This is probably the most embarrassing thing. We have some wonderful things coming out of COVID, specifically, America's response has been a victory in health care. These vaccines are a gift, but there's
Saved - October 29, 2023 at 7:34 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
A recent study found similar SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, challenging claims of vaccine effectiveness in stopping spread. Those spreading this misinformation now seek to censor dissenting voices. (Study link: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.06.23295138v1)

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

New study confirms vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals exhaled similar levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. This further demonstrates that claims that being vaccinated "stopped the spread" and "protected nana" were misinformation - superstition, not science. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.09.06.23295138v1 Yet the very same people that spread this misinformation, want new laws so they can censor anyone that questions or disagrees with them.

Quantity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies exhaled per minute during natural breathing over the course of COVID-19 infection medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org
Saved - October 29, 2023 at 6:39 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Labor's decision to increase migration rates has led to a record-high population increase, while rental home supply has plummeted. Consequently, rents have surged by 14.6%, impacting renters' living standards and hindering their ability to own homes. Labor's policies have disproportionately affected their own supporters, who now face record rental increases and soaring electricity prices. The United Australia Party calls for reduced migration and a focus on strengthening regional areas to alleviate the housing crisis. (499 characters)

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

ALBANESE’S WAR ON RENTERS : Rents up 14.6% p.a Has their been a greater betrayal of Labor battlers in Australia’s history ? The Labor government’s decision to increase Australia’s migration rates to record levels (I don’t remember Albanese mentioning that at the last election) has resulted in the national population increasing by 563,205 persons – a record-high increase - in just 12 months. And they are not stopping. And this has happened at a time when the supply of rental homes has collapsed to a record low, down 22.8% below the September average for the past five years. This has resulted in rents surging by 14.6% over the year to September, with Sydney (18.2%), Perth (14.9%), Melbourne (13.6%), Brisbane (12.2%) and Adelaide (11.1%). This massive increase in rents smashes the living standards of renters, as they not only have less disposable income, but they are forced to move further away for cheaper rents, shift into smaller accommodation, or move into share housing. It also forces up home prices, destroying the dreams of many from ever owning their own home. And the majority of those adversely affected by Labor’s policies most likely voted Labor at the last election. Those that voted are Labor are being punished not only with record rental increases, but also with electricity prices surges due to Labor’s climate zealotry to appeal to wealthy Teal voters. Labor no longer represents working Australians. The United Australia Party calls for an immediately down-scaling of migration to Australia at least until the housing supply catches up. Secondly, we need policies to strengthen regional areas, rather than building "battery hen" style housing in the major cities. For example, where rents increased 18.2% in Sydney, they only increased 2% in Regional NSW. https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2023/10/welcome-to-australia-make-sure-you-pack-a-tent/

Welcome to Australia. Make sure you pack a tent. Australia’s rental crisis continues to worsen thanks to the Albanese government’s record immigration program, which saw around 500,000 net overseas migrants land in the country in 2022-23: New figures from PropTrack show that the supply of rental homes has collapsed to a record low, down 22.8% below the September average for the past five years: macrobusiness.com.au
Saved - October 29, 2023 at 5:54 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The WHO's dishonesty is evident as they blame the climate crisis for excess deaths instead of acknowledging the adverse effects of Covid vaccines. They falsely attribute diseases to air pollution and extreme temperatures. However, data shows a decline in deaths from air pollution and extreme temperatures. Cold weather actually poses a greater risk than heat. The Lancet study reveals that warmer temperatures caused fewer deaths from extreme cold. The WHO's intentional deception is evident, and they cannot be trusted. Funding should be cut off instead of giving them more power.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION ARE LYING With such dishonesty, it’s time to leave the WHO So the WHO are trying to blame "the climate crisis" for the unprecedented level of excess deaths. And according to the WHO it’s not the toxic spike protein from the Covid injections causing increases in diseases like diabetes, cancer & respiratory illness - but air pollution and extreme temperatures!! This is disgraceful dishonesty from Tedros - not only is he covering up for the adverse events from the vaccines the he promoted - but he’s falsely blaming "climate change" as part of the WHO‘s power grab under their Global Pandemic Treaty The truth is the number of deaths from air pollution is in decline - since 1990 death rates have nearly halved - from 156 deaths per 100,000 down to 85.6 deaths per 100,000 in 2019 - the exact opposite of Tedros’s lies. https://ourworldindata.org/air-pollution And deaths from extreme temperatures are also in decline - again the exact opposite of Tedros‘s lies If you follow the peer-reviewed science, the facts are that cold weather kills many times more than heat. And moderate warming over recent decades has reduced deaths from temperature extremes not increase them. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(21)00081-4/fulltext A study published in the Lancet concluded that between 2000/3 to 2016/19 that warmer temperatures caused 116,000 extra heat deaths, but avoided 238,000 deaths from extreme cold - therefore in net terms the world has experienced 166,000 fewer deaths from extreme temperatures. It is inconceivable that the WHO is unaware of these facts - and the only conclusion is that they are lying. Intentionally trying to deceive people. Yet Tedros has the hide to put out a video a few days earlier complaining about "a torrent of misinformation and disinformation". The WHO have demonstrated they can‘t be trusted. Instead of ceding sovereignty and handing more power to these unelected & unaccountable scoundrels at the WHO - we should be telling them to take a running leap, and cutting off funding. But instead we’ve just had Penny Wong hand Tedros millions of Australian taxpayer funds.

Air Pollution Our overview on both indoor and outdoor air pollution. ourworldindata.org

@DrTedros - Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus

The climate crisis is a health crisis. Air pollution and extreme temperatures are causing an increase in diseases like diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular and respiratory. People are dying prematurely, and the most vulnerable are being hit the hardest. We must prioritize healing our…

@DrTedros - Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus

Good talks with @SenatorWong about #Australia’s commitment to multilateralism and health security, shown again through its announcement of $100 million contribution to @WHO to support global efforts to prevent, prepare for and respond to pandemics. We also discussed the process… https://t.co/AzqTjyPGDK

Saved - October 29, 2023 at 5:54 PM

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

$100 million of Australian taxpayer money - no wonder he’s smiling.

Saved - October 29, 2023 at 12:52 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
A western Sydney doctor revealed a concerning rise in blood clots, cancers, and deaths among vaccinated and boosted patients. The media, government, and political parties are accused of concealing Australia's alarming excess deaths. Urgent action is needed to address this crisis.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

I spoke with a prominent western Sydney doctor today, and he broke down telling me about the unprecedented number of his vaccinated & boosted patients being diagnosed with blood clots, cancers and dying. How are we even going to start to address this problem when the media, government bureaucrats and the Labor & Liberal parties continue to cover-up the unprecedented level of excess deaths in Australia.

Saved - October 24, 2023 at 1:16 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
A cardiologist expresses concern about the Covid vaccines, criticizing those who rely on celebrities and politicians for medical advice. They question the knowledge of medical regulators and suggest legal action for negligence. Another user responds with a link.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

"As a cardiologist, I am frightened" - Dr. Peter McCullough Dr. Peter McCullough Summarizes the Latest science on the covid injections. And to think, we have individuals from the left side of politics (who believe they are more enlightened than others) that have been so influenced by the propaganda, that they take medical advice from B-grade celebrities & politicians like Dan Andrews - while they mock doctors like Dr McCullough trying to warn them about the dangers of the covid vaccines. And what about our medical regulators at the TGA that continue to assert the "benefits outweigh the risks" - when they haven’t got a clue what the medium & long term risks are. These fools need to prosecuted for negligence endangering lives.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A cardiologist provides an update on the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Studies have shown that the vaccines can cause direct harm to heart muscle cells, abnormal heart contractions, and abnormal electrical activity. Messenger RNA from the vaccines has been found in the human heart and circulating in the blood for up to 28 days. The spike protein produced by the messenger RNA has also been detected in the blood for up to 6 months. The spike protein is dangerous to cells, tissues, and organs in the body. The messenger RNA used in the vaccines has been modified and is synthetic. Autopsy studies have shown that the vaccine can cause myocarditis and cardiac damage. A basketball player who received the vaccine suffered a cardiac arrest and died two years later.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a cardiologist, I'm gonna give an update, as I would to other doctors and nurses in what we call bench to bedside. Bench to bedside. Some of you have heard that, that's a colloquialism that we use in medicine. Here's the updates and this is all new from the time I presented to this committee several months ago. The first papers by Schreckenberg and colleagues published in the Journal of Pharmacology. Schreckenberg took heart muscle cells from rats in a test tube and applied both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine, directly to the cardiomyocytes. This is the type of safety research that the companies should have done during the development of the vaccines. They found within 48 hours the heart muscle cells got very sick. They started to contract in abnormal ways, conduct electricity and depolarization in very abnormal ways within 48 hours. It was evidence of direct cardiac toxicity. If this would have been a drug in development, likely the drug company would have killed it because It demonstrated early and direct harm to the heart muscle cells. Now, Crosson and colleagues from Harvard has found the messenger RNA in the human heart in people who have died after the vaccine. It's physically in the heart. Castriuta and colleagues published in the journal Pathology Microbiology and Immunology has found circulating messenger RNA in the blood for 28 days and that's as long as they've looked. So, the messenger RNA itself is now being measured in research and these are not findings that are reassuring at all. Brogne and colleagues from Germany, published in the journal Proteomics found circulating spike protein produced by the messenger RNA in the blood in half of the people who took the vaccine out to 6 months and that's as long as they've looked. So, if someone is following The government schedule for the vaccines right now, they have circulating spike protein in the bloodstream from the vaccine for 6 months, they take another shot, they get more circulating spike protein from the vaccines, and it keeps going and going. The spike protein itself is directly dangerous to cells, tissues, and organs in the human body and these are very exact measurements telling us that this vaccine, the messenger RNA, and the spike protein that is produced are long lasting and are not being broken down by normal human enzymes. The messenger RNA is synthetic. It's been changed. The change is called pseudouridination. It replaces a normal nucleic acid, uracil, with something called pseudouridine. There are indestructible 5 prime and 3 prime nucleoside analog caps. The Nobel Prize was just awarded to Weismann and to Kericho for this modification of the RNA. Now, in theory, the messenger RNA would be great if it was producing a normal human protein like missing insulin in a type one diabetic, as an example. But when we're talking about a vaccine and producing an abnormal and dangerous protein, it's a very bad idea. Now, the vaccine companies that own intellectual property on messenger RNA. There's 9,000 patents on messenger RNA and the leading patent assignees are CureVac, Sanofi, BioNTech, Moderna, and the U. S. Government are the leading patent assignees. No single person invented messenger RNA. Don't be fooled by someone who comes out and said they invented it. 9,000 patents. There are an incredible set of investments made worldwide by companies on messenger RNA The ones that are made for the vaccines appear to be an intellectual gamble that we can Trick the body into producing a foreign protein and not trigger autoimmunity and not trigger problems. Next up will be the flu vaccine. If the flu vaccine and one of the proteins this flu vaccine makes is the spike protein and it's called the hemagglutinase on the flu vaccine, we could take a relatively benign vaccine and make it a very harmful vaccine if we had uncontrolled production of influenza hemagglutinase. Keep that in mind. Now, as a cardiologist, a paper published in radiology caught my eye. Nakahara and colleagues studied over 700 people who took the vaccine and 300 people who did not take the vaccine. They had cardiac PET scans, positron emission tomography, which studies the metabolism of the heart. Normally, the heart relies on free fatty acids as its fuel from the bloodstream. A diseased pattern is when the heart starts to prefer glucose and takes up 18 fluorodeoxyglucose. So, when I order a PET scan in clinical practice, I'm looking for a diseased area of the heart, typically because it's not getting enough blood flow, with a cardiac PET scan. What Nakahara and colleagues found is virtually everyone who took the vaccine, The heart shifted towards taking up Fluorodeoxyglucose. The PET scans became abnormal. 65% of people who took the vaccine had a sore arm. Those who had a sore arm had the greatest abnormalities in PET scan. Now, Schwab and colleagues in Germany have done an autopsy study and they found when there's inflammation in the arm at the time of death, there's inflammation in the heart. So a clinical clue into who may become sick with the vaccines and who doesn't is the initial reaction in the arm. This is a very important point. Many have shown this. Now to humans. Holscher and colleagues at the University of Michigan who sought me out in an approved project by the University of Michigan School of Public Health, of which I am a graduate, we performed a systematic review of all the autopsy cases published in the peer reviewed medical literature. We reviewed over 600 papers, extracted all the data from each autopsy, made evidence tables from that, and then submitted those results to 3 independent reviewers for them to adjudicate whether or not the death was caused by the vaccine based on our contemporary knowledge of what the vaccine does to the human body, not based on the author's original conclusions because we were learning over time and it's very hard to see case by case what was going on. In 325 cases, The panel adjudicated 73.9% of the cases as being due to the vaccine or significantly contribute to the vaccine. Now, in the cases, the 28 cases, where the doctors thought it was myocarditis or the cardiac arrest was due to the vaccine 100% of the time myocarditis or cardiac damage was found due to the vaccine. This paper was favorably reviewed by The Lancet editorial staff. It was triaged to a lower journal and, at Lancet Family Journal, we declined and took it to a higher level journal for continued review, but Lancet accepted it on its preprint server and after 2 reviews to make sure that the paper met all the criteria for a preprint publication, it received surges of downloads over 1 night and then Elsevier, the parent publishing company in Lancet, censored it up their platform And they claimed at that time that the methodology did not support the conclusions We used a standard search technology called PRISMA technology and we had standard adjudication review that met every bit of grade for academic publication. That paper then was posted on the European Commission preprint server and it's received record downloads. To give you an idea of the proxy for academic interest in this typical vaccine paper, of which there are many different aspects of vaccines, about 25 to 50 downloads and reads. We are now at over 250,000 downloads and reads on the autopsy paper, but as we sit here today, the next person who dies after a vaccine, and there is no other explanation. There's no other terminal disease, terminal cardiac disease, terminal cancer, no homicide, suicide, drug overdose, no other explanation. On a more probable than that basis, That death is due to the vaccine if we performed an autopsy. I want everyone to understand that. Now to population. So we've gone to from the bench to the bedside to the population. A single case, I think, exemplifies the great concern of what we're facing right now. It's the case of Oscar Cabrera Adamas. He is a Dominican basketball player who plays internationally. In 2021, he gets a COVID nineteen vaccine He suffers a cardiac arrest on the basketball court and then is successfully resuscitated. He messages out publicly that he has vaccine myocarditis and his cardiac arrest is due to the myocarditis. He is appropriately taken out of sports because we know when there's myocarditis, athletic competition can trigger a cardiac arrest. This was our guidelines before COVID-nineteen. So all forms of myocarditis cannot participate in sports. He's out of sports. He's trying to recover. Presumably he's treated. He's on a medical stress test with the EKG on to assess whether or not he's ready to return to sports, did not have an ICD implanted, and he suffers a fatal cardiac arrest on the treadmill. Now, as a cardiologist, I've supervised I've never had a fatal case because we have the defibrillator there, IVs, and all the drugs. So I can tell you almost certainly this cardiac arrest was a brutal cardiac arrest in a perfectly healthy basketball player. If what happened to Oscar Cabrera Adamas is any proxy for what could happen to individuals taking the vaccine. As a cardiologist, I am frightened. Let me repeat, he died 2 years after he took the initial vaccines in 2021. He and he under supervised medical care, eDi to give you any idea of the level of concern.

@Boris4T - Aussie Warpath

@CKellyUAP https://t.co/0yLHRnQNeC

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. McCullough: "Pfizer Should Have Never Been Approved" In Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, there were more deaths in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, denoted Dr. @P_McCulloughMD. "And if it [the data] would be properly analyzed, the conclusion was…

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker discusses additional deaths that occurred among people who received the Pfizer vaccine. They criticize Pfizer for not updating the slides or providing additional information about these deaths during the FDA meeting. The speaker believes that the FDA approval process failed because the panel did not ask about these deaths. They argue that if the data had been properly analyzed, it would have shown a higher cardiovascular risk with Pfizer compared to a placebo. The speaker concludes that Pfizer should not have been approved if all the data had been presented honestly and fairly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the randomized trials, the original ones that Aaron Siri quoted, Pfizer was the lead. We've now learned from the time of the data cutoff in mid November of 2020 to the time of the FDA meeting December 10, 2020, there were 38 additional deaths that occurred. These were people on the vaccine, 38 additional deaths. Pfizer did not update the core slides at the FDA Committee meeting, nor did they provide an appendix to the briefing booklet. No one on the panel asked Pfizer if there were additional deaths. Now, I've served on FDA panels. I've served as an adviser to companies, I've served as the main presenter. In each and every instance, I've always asked the sponsor, has anything else happened since the time you closed the dataset? That is a standard question. So, the entire FDA approval process failed. Turns out there was more deaths with Pfizer. And if it would be properly analyzed, the conclusion was there's a 3 to 4 fold excess cardiovascular risk with Pfizer compared to placebo. If that meeting would have been conducted correctly and if Pfizer would have been fully responsive to presenting the data and fully, honestly, and fairly presenting everything that happened, that product should never have been approved. Pfizer should have never been approved.
Saved - October 18, 2023 at 7:01 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
New research challenges the theory behind climate alarmism. A recent paper shows that CO2 levels were not in equilibrium and actually rose to 383 ppm in the early 1940s, corresponding with temperature increases. Fluctuations in CO2 levels are driven by natural temperature variations, not human activity. The rise in CO2 since 1958 can be largely attributed to natural factors, with only a small portion from fossil fuel emissions. This undermines the need for drastic measures to reduce CO2 emissions. Resources can be better utilized to address real environmental issues and poverty.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

💥HUGE💥 HUGE 💥HUGE 💥 CLIMATE ALARMISM HAS BEEN DEBUNKED BY THE LATEST SCIENCE - if you follow the science its all over for the climate alarmists. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373256379_Science_of_Climate_Change_About_Historical_CO2-Data_since_1826_Explanation_of_the_Peak_around_1940 Climate Alarmism is built upon the theory that; ❎C02 levels were in equilibrium (at around 280-300 ppm) ❎Use fossil fuels (and steel, cement & aluminium production) increases CO2 levels ❎Increases in global CO2 concentrations increases average global temperature. ❎An increase in average global temperatures is bad, and causes more bad weather. But this theory has been destroyed by a new paper which demonstrates that CO2 levels (using an analysis of 979 technical papers reporting from 1,901 air sample measure have not been in equilibrium and in fact rose to 383ppm in early 1940’s (corresponding with temperature increases at that time) and then fell. CO2 levels have been measured at Mauna Loa in Hawaii since 1960 - but prior to that CO2 measurements rely upon proxy data from Antarctic ice samples which are questionable given it is subject to a great deal of selection bias. https://notrickszone.com/2023/10/17/97404-direct-co2-measurements-from-1826-2008-indicate-humans-do-not-drive-co2-change/ However, the late Dr. Ernst-Georg Beck spent years compiling an exhaustive chemical database of the CO2 levels measured in air samples from across the globe. Analyzing 979 technical papers reporting from 1,901 air sample measurement stations, Beck’s CO2 measurement data was published in a scientific paper entitled “Reconstruction of Atmospheric CO2 Background Levels since 1826 from Direct Measurements near Ground” after his death in 2022. The 60,000 global-scale chemical measurements compiled between 1930 and 1950 using data from 25 authors and locations assessed that between 1939 and 1943 global atmospheric CO2 rose to 383 ppm – the same concentration again achieved in 2007. After the early 1940s, the chemical measurements indicate CO2 plummeted  to 310 ppm by the late 1940s. These fluctuations are consistent with variations in sea surface temperatures (warmer water releases more CO2, cooler less) and temperature-dependent soil respiration (with mixing ratios ranging between 500 and 20,000 ppm) processes, suggesting that temperature is the driver, and CO2 variations are the effect. This proves that the major driver of CO2 levels are natural temperature variations. This T→CO2 directionality found in measured CO2 air sample data from 19th to mid-20th century is also evident for the satellite era. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that of the 90 ppm rise in CO2 since 1958 (the Mauna Loa era), not more than 12 ppm could be said to have derived from fossil fuel emissions. And when the CO2 rose to 383 ppm in the early 1940s, the impact from anthropogenic emissions “can be largely excluded.” This means that climate alarmism is over. C02 varitations happen outside man’s control and schemes to reduce fossil fuel use will a such a negligible effect on CO2 that they are pointless even if CO2 causes bad weather. This is great news for the world, the trillions of dollars that was going to be spent on solar panels, wind turbines, toxic big batteries and new environmentally destructive high voltage transmission lines, can instead be spent on tackling real environmental issues and lifting people out of poverty

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net
97,404 Direct CO2 Measurements From 1826-2008 Indicate Humans Do Not Drive CO2 Change notrickszone.com
Saved - October 16, 2023 at 7:45 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Ivermectin denial, seen as a psychiatric malady, disregards numerous studies showing its effectiveness in treating Covid. Big Pharma-sponsored studies that failed to detect efficacy lacked proper dosing and zinc combination. Ivermectin deniers ignore peer-reviewed science and frontline doctors' experiences. This denial is associated with leftist ideology and a willingness to receive multiple experimental injections. These individuals require assistance. (499 characters)

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

When there’s 60 Ivermectin studies from 54 independent teams in 24 different countries showing statistically significant improvements in mortality, hospitalisation, cases & recovery - including 18 prophylaxis studies with 8,485 subjects combined in the treatment group and 11,279 in the control group showing an 85% lower risk of Covid infection - it’s time that IVERMECTIN DENIAL is treated a psychiatric malady involving an emotional or behavioural disorder. The small number of Big Pharma sponsored Ivermectin studies that failed to detect efficacy either involved studies that gave inadequate doses and/or failed to combine the Ivermectin with Zinc. They are not worth the paper they are written on, yet Ivermectin deniers cling to these in a deluded hope. It’s unclear whether Ivermectin deniers brains have been cooked by the spike protein from the jabs, or if it’s just some emotional or behavioural disorder as to why they ignore the peer-reviewed science and the expert opinions of frontline doctors with real world experience successfully treating covid patients with Ivermectin + Zinc + Doxycycline. However, one thing we do know - the psychiatric malady of Ivermectin denial is closely associated leftist ideology, voting YES to the Voice, the anti-scientific belief that masks stop covid, a belief that Chinese made solar panels can stop bad weather, and a desire to be injected with an experimental substance 4 or more times. These people need our help. https://c19ivm.org/meta.html

Saved - October 9, 2023 at 1:28 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Biden's $6B payment to Iran for hostages has emboldened extremists, making hostage taking a profitable business. Every American and Westerner abroad now have a price on their heads. More hostages are being taken. Trump was right.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

TRUMP WAS RIGHT Biden’s $6 billion ransom payment to Iran in exchange for hostages has emboldened hostage takers and put a price on the head of every American (and every Westerner) when they travel abroad. Biden has made hostage taking a highly profitable business for extremists, which has only resulted in more hostages being taken.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden's recent decision to pay a $6 billion ransom to Iran in exchange for hostages is seen as a surrender and humiliation for the United States. This payment to the leading state sponsor of terrorism is expected to fuel violence and bloodshed in the Middle East and beyond, endangering innocent lives. Moreover, it increases the likelihood of more Americans being held captive in the future, as kidnappers realize they can profit from Biden's willingness to pay large sums of money. While it is known that there are Americans among the hostages, no further details have been provided.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biden just agreed to pay a $6,000,000,000 ransom to the Iranian dictatorship in exchange for hostages. This is yet another Biden surrender in a further blistering humiliation of the United States of America to the world stage. But even worse, this decision will be extremely deadly. Biden is giving $6,000,000,000 to the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism, Just as when Obama sent the Iranian regime pilots of cash for hostages in the dark of night. Remember, plane loads cash. Biden's ransom payment will be immediately used to stoke violence bloodshed and mayhem throughout the Middle East and all around the world, costing countless, innocent lives. Tradently Biden's ransom payments also make it dramatically likely that even more Americans will be held captive in the future because Biden has shown that he will pay gargantuan sums of money. Meaning the kidnappers turn a massive profit. They're making money hand over fist. In other words, Biden has put a bounty on the head of every American citizen abroad. Speaker 1: Can you give us more clarity about how many Americans are among the hostages? All I can say is that we know there are Americans about, among the hostages, but I cannot provide more details at this point.
Saved - October 4, 2023 at 10:10 PM

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

Hospitals were saving lives with Hydroxychloroquine in early 2020, but then criminals intervened and stopped it. They deserve to spend the rest of their life in jail.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

New Peer-reviewed study : HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE SAVED LIVES @AlboMP @Bowenchris How many Australians died because of the stupidity and ignorance of Albanese & Bowen who ignored the science and rubbished Hydroxychloroquine on the floor of the Australian Parliament ? Both…

Saved - October 2, 2023 at 6:04 AM

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

MILITARY FORCE or POLICE ? In violation of Article 114 of the Australian Constitution, the Victorian Premier raised and maintained a military force to brutalise the citizens of that state. I wonder if Albanese’s sham Covid inquiry will investigate that ? https://aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Constitution/chapter5

Saved - September 25, 2023 at 1:59 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The Mayo Clinic, a renowned medical research center, updated its website to state that Hydroxychloroquine may be used to treat COVID-19 in certain hospitalized patients. Those who dismissed the drug should apologize to families who lost loved ones due to denied access. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who ridiculed HCQ in Parliament and blocked studies showing its effectiveness, should be the first to apologize. It's time to acknowledge the potential of Hydroxychloroquine.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE DENIERS NEED TO START WITH THE APOLOGISES The Mayo Clinic regarded by many as the best hospital system and medical research center in the USA, recently updated on their website regarding the drug Hydroxychloroquine. In the new update on their site, it now says, “Hydroxychloroquine may be used to treat coronavirus (COVID-19) in certain hospitalized patients.” https://thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/mayo-clinic-website-now-says-hydroxychloroquine-can-be/ Its now time for those that acted as Big Pharma’s useful idiots and played politics over Hydroxychloroquine to wash the blood from their hands and apologise to the families that lost loved to Covid in Australian hospitals that were denied access to this drug. The first person that needs to wash the blood from his hands & apologise is the current Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who ridiculed HCQ on the floor of the Australian Parliament, and also for preventing peer-reviewed medical studies showing HCQ effective against Covid from being tabled in the Parliament.

Saved - September 19, 2023 at 11:35 AM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Senator Ralph Babet and The United Australia Party challenge the AEC in Federal Court tomorrow. They aim to prevent the AEC from counting YES votes as informal in a referendum. Watch the live stream or join the public gallery at Court 7C, Sydney. United Australia Party leading the way.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

Tomorrow, Wednesday 20th September Senator Ralph Babet and The United Australia Party take on the AEC in Federal Court. We are trying to prevent the AEC from ‘stacking the decks‘ in referendum - where the AEC plan to count as YES votes, but rule as informal. Watch on the internet from 10.15am https://youtube.com/@FederalCourtAus… Or join the public gallery and watch live, Court 7C, 97-99 Goulburn St, Sydney. Yet again, its the United Australia Party leading from the front.

Saved - September 19, 2023 at 8:41 AM

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

The nasty vicious hatred of the YES campaign.

@SenatorAntic - Senator Alex Antic

Walking into the launch of the @FairAusADV NO to the Voice campaign in Adelaide this evening. Is this the “unity” the Australian Labor Party promised us their referendum was going to bring?

Saved - September 18, 2023 at 10:14 AM

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

MAGDA’S LIST Magda is making a list of dissenters for "future reference" Stalin would be so proud.

@MagdaSzubanski - Magda Szubanski AO

YES voters and reasonable undecideds…a favour. Please could you screen cap and document any misinformation , defamation and lies being putting about by the NO campaign? Accounts they are coming from etc Just for future reference 😉 Thanks muchly

Saved - September 11, 2023 at 12:51 AM

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

The hardest day in my life as an MP was sitting listening to Caitlin’s Mum, with Caitlin’s ashes in a box on the table. Caitlin’s Mum told me that Caitlin only got injected because of the mandates. Caitlin was never at risk from Covid, but she was from the fanatics

@RaeleneKenned20 - Justice4Caitlin

I've never shared this photo, because it upsets me so much. Around midnight Saturday 13th November, 2021. Caitlin drove herself to Emergency and presented with Shortness of Breath. The hospital didn't do a spirometry test, lung function, any test for asthma. There was no…

Saved - September 9, 2023 at 3:14 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The Pfizer vaccine contract has been revealed by a South African court order. It states that the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are unknown, and there may be adverse effects. Politicians worldwide assured safety while signing this contract. Our government lied to the public, explaining their desperation to keep these contracts hidden.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

PFIZER VACCINE CONTRACT REVEALED - Our Government has been lying to us. A South African court has ordered that the Pfizer vaccine contract between the SA Government & Pfizer be made public. And here it is : https://healthjusticeinitiative.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/OCRPfizer-1_Redacted.pdf It‘a reasonable to assumed that the terms and conditions in this contract would be very similar for every nation. Clause 5.5 provides, Purchaser (the government) further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known. So while poltiticans around the world were assuring the public that the vaccines were "safe & effective" - they’d signed a contract acknowledging that the long-term effects & efficacy of the Vaccine were not known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that were not known. Our government and politicians lied to the public. No wonder they are so desperate to keep these contracts hidden.

Page not found - Health Justice Initiative (HJI) healthjusticeinitiative.org.za
Saved - September 9, 2023 at 1:52 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
An academic received a large sum of taxpayer money to investigate disinformation. However, he wrote a defamatory paper about me without evidence. It seems he did it to align with the grant's objectives. Perhaps he should return the money. [Link to grant details]

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

THE PLOT THICKENS Well, well, well - what do we have here ? The academic who wrote the junk paper defaming me, by "concluding" (with any evidence) that I’d intentionally spread disinformation to cause harm, had received $456,541 from taxpayers to fund his work. Tim obtained this money from the Australian Research Council on the basis he was investigating "disinformation" and "coordinated inauthentic behaviour". Perhaps this is why he made false and defamatory claims against me, so it would fit within the parameters of the grant money he received ? Perhaps Tim should consider returning the grant money ? https://dataportal.arc.gov.au/NCGP/Web/Grant/Grant/DE220101435

Saved - September 8, 2023 at 1:16 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Craig Kelly, an Australian politician, has initiated defamation proceedings against two academics from Queensland University of Technology. The academics claimed that Kelly's tweets mainly focused on undermining vaccines, scientific institutions, and spreading antigovernment rhetoric. Kelly strongly denies these allegations, stating that the academics are misinformed and biased. He also expressed concern about their attempt to promote censorship regulations through an academic paper. Kelly has written to the vice-chancellor of QUT, urging disciplinary action against the academics.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

DEFAMATION PROCEEDINGS HAVE COMMENCED Although I should be flattered that two academics from the Queensland University of Technology, undertook a "mixed methods analysis" of 4,371 tweets collected from my Twitter feed from May 2021 to 24 Sept and concluded; "that most of Craig Kelly’s tweets revolved around undermining vaccines and scientific institutions while spreading anti-government rhetoric" "Overall, we find that Kelly is singularly important in Australia as a driver of health and political misinformation" Today I have commenced Defamation proceedings, and issued a Concerns Notice to the paper’s authors Timothy Graham and Katherine FitzGerald. I am not going to put up with such individuals making false and defamatory assertions, allegedly that I have intentionally spread "disinformation" when they don’t have a clue what they are talking about - for in truth what they deem as misinformation & disinformation is simply anything that conflicts with their own personal prejudices, political biases and ignorance. And it is a grave concern that these academics peddle such misinformation under the guise of an academic paper to call for new censorship regulations. I have also written to the vice-Chancellor of QUT and I hope these academics additionally face some form of disciplinary action for spreading their misinformation. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/78adm/

Saved - September 6, 2023 at 2:02 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Dr. Peter McCullough reveals a shocking incident in Australia. Billionaire Clive Palmer generously acquired a supply of hydroxychloroquine for the entire continent, but Australian authorities seized and destroyed it. This act, driven by the fear of hydroxychloroquine's potential, protected the profits of global elites at the cost of countless lives denied access to the drug. The truth behind this suppression threatens the credibility of Covid vaccines.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

Dr. Peter McCullough : "You can't believe this you know I spent time with billionaire Clive Palmer in Australia. Do you know he bought a supply of hydroxychloroquine for the entire continent, entire continent, free hydroxychloroquine? And do you know what, the Australian authorities seized it and they destroyed it." The Liberal government aided and abetted criminals whom were desperate to stop Hydroxychloroquine, because if the truth was known, the Covid ‘vaccines’ would have never have been able to obtain emergency use authorisation. Hydroxychloroquine threatened hundreds of billions in profits for the global elites - therefore Hydroxychloroquine had to be vilified & destroyed - no matter how many people died because they were denied access to it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hydroxychloroquine was initially praised for its potential in reducing COVID-19 symptoms and hospitalizations. However, it soon faced widespread criticism worldwide. In Australia, billionaire Clive Palmer purchased a large supply of hydroxychloroquine for the entire continent, intending to distribute it for free. Unfortunately, the Australian authorities seized and destroyed the medication.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Symptoms and actually reducing the need for hospitalization and oxygen supports. I mean, that was incredible. That's just for starters. Then, as things unfolded, many know hydroxychloroquine was slammed all over the world, not just in the United States. But Craig, you can't believe this. You know, I spent time with billionaire Clive Palmer in Australia, you know, he bought he bought a supply of hydroxychloroquine for the entire continent, entire continent, free hydroxychloroquine. And you know what? The Australian authority seized it and they destroyed it.
Saved - August 19, 2023 at 4:44 PM
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The government's proposed legislation aims to censor free speech and suppress criticism of the globalist agenda. They plan to establish a global system for Vaccine Passports and make the nation subservient to the World Health Organisation and Big Pharma. Additionally, they seek to create a housing crisis, attack farmers, increase energy costs, divide the nation, and cripple productivity. These actions will burden working families with high living costs, leaving them with little ownership.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

A PENETRATED CABINET ? Klaus must be happy with the progress …… Legislation drafted (Misinformation & Disinformation Bill) giving Government power to censor free speech and suppress any criticism of the globalist agenda Green light WHO Pandemic Treaty and changes to International Health Regulations to make the nation subservient to the World Health Organisation & Big Pharma and establish global system for Vaccine Passports Create a housing crisis with record levels of migration and use this as a guise to establish 15 minute cities Legislate emission reduction targets including agriculture to attack farmers. Close down coal fired power stations, to push up energy costs. Seek to divide nation by attempting to insert racist provisions into the Constitution Attack and vilify anyone that questions the WEF Cripple productivity with red & green tape to create a cost of living crisis, with high rates of food inflation & energy costs, increasing rents & skyrocketing mortgage repayments for working families - so they will own nothing

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Economic Forum has been integrating young leaders for many years, including Prime Minister Trudeau. They are proud that many members of Trudeau's cabinet are young global leaders of the Forum. However, Craig Kelly has accused Dan Andrews of being a Nazi and has compared the Forum's policies to the Cambodian genocide. Kelly is seen as a menace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This, notion to integrate young leaders is part of the World Economic Forum for since many years. They all have been young global leaders of the World Economic Forum. But, what we are very proud of now, the young generation like, Prime Minister Trudeau, said we penetrate the cabinets. And I would know that half of this cabinet or even more half of this cabinet for our, actually, young noble leaders of the World Economic Forum. Speaker 1: Craig Kelly has accused Dan Andrews of being a Nazi. He's compared policies of the World Economic Forum to the Cambodian genocide of Pol Pot. Craig Kelly is a menace.
View Full Interactive Feed