TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ianmiles
@ianmiles - Ian Miles Cheong
Antisemites are turning me into a Zionist. Their low IQ energy is too much for anyone intelligent to handle.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I report that Norbert Gyurcsik, a British man, was jailed for possessing 'extreme' music, including 'extreme right-wing' recordings. He was arrested last May for buying and distributing albums whose lyrics breached terrorism law and incited racial hatred. He received 40 months per offence, served concurrently.
@ianmiles - Ian Miles Cheong
A British man has been jailed over possession of 'extreme' music. Norbert Gyurcsik was jailed over his music collection, which included 'extreme right-wing' recordings. He was arrested in May last year for buying and distributing albums whose lyrics breached terrorism legislation and were intended to incite racial hatred. He was sentenced to 40 months for each offence at Worcester Crown Court. The terms will be served concurrently.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This ad in Denmark shows two Danes making out before an "expert" shows up and tells them that they shouldn't date each other because that is inbreeding and that they need to have kids with non-whites. https://t.co/liNcIVCnez
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
The media hates Stephen Miller. I wonder why. https://t.co/CarSAncfKQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
"You may assert there's no waste in the Pentagon. You may assert there's no waste in treasury."
"If you agree there is corruption, why are you not celebrating the cuts, the reforms that are being instituted?"
"The taxpayers fund it. They pay for it."
"The illegal aliens he brought in from Venezuela, from Haiti, from Nicaragua, they are not doing farm work."
"Are in our cities collecting welfare."
"They funnel money to their cronies all over the world through a swampy network of NGOs, nongovernmental organizations."
"What Democrats are saying is they oppose democracy itself."
"We and president Trump are on the side of democracy."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may assert there's no waste in the Pentagon. You may assert there's no waste in treasury.
Speaker 1: I'm not You may assert
Speaker 0: there's no waste in the HHS.
Speaker 1: That, Steven. Steven, I don't think anyone
Speaker 0: Then why are you not celebrating these cuts if you agree there is waste? If you agree there is abuse? If you agree there is corruption, why are you not celebrating the cuts, the reforms that are being instituted? It is true that many of the people in this room for four years failed to cover the fact that Joe Biden was mentally incompetent. It is also true that many people in this room who have used this talking point that Elon is not elected failed to understand how government works.
So I'd like for the opportunity for a brief civics lesson. What president Trump is doing is he is removing federal bureaucrats who are defying democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people. You have these giant cavernous office buildings Washington DC carved out of marble stone and granite in the Greek classical style, some of most gorgeous buildings on earth. The taxpayers fund it. They pay for it.
They upkeep it. They provide electricity to. And no one's showing up? And what what are they doing at home? Watching their favorite streaming shows?
It's crazy. Of course, they have to get back into the office because they work for everyone watching me today.
Speaker 1: They've had a very good day.
Speaker 0: The illegal aliens that Joe Biden brought into our country are not full stop doing farm work. They are not. The illegal aliens he brought in from Venezuela, from Haiti, from Nicaragua, they are not doing farm work. Are in our cities collecting welfare. As for the farmers, there is a guest worker program that president Trump supports.
Over time as well, you will transition into automation, so we'll never have to have this conversation ever again. But there's no universe in which this nation is going to allow the previous president to flood our nation with millions and millions of illegal aliens who just get to stay here, and we are especially not going to allow a subset of those illegal aliens to rape and murder our citizens. There is probably no entity in the government that is more of an entrenched power center of unelected bureaucrats with less accountability, less oversight than USAID. They funnel money to their cronies all over the world through a swampy network of NGOs, nongovernmental organizations. What Democrats are saying is they oppose democracy itself.
They oppose the idea that the American people can elect a man, in this case, our president Donald Trump, to reform the government according to the will of the people. This is a battle between the will of the people through their president Donald Trump. And the will of an unelected federal bureaucracy. We and president Trump are on the side of democracy.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Hillary Clinton says White Christians are the greatest danger to civilization. https://t.co/TOYxXk1R3o
Video Transcript AI Summary
She expresses pride that the country has always been 'a work in progress,' noting that we haven't reached a 'more perfect union' and that a civil war was fought over part of it. She points out that people have protested for hundreds of years because things were not as they should be given the nation's ideals and how they should be moving toward them. She argues this ongoing struggle is what makes the United States special. She warns against turning the clock back to recreate a world dominated by 'white men of a certain persuasion, a certain religion, a certain point of view, a certain ideology,' calling it damaging to what we should be aiming for. She adds that we were on the path toward that—imperfectly, with bumps along the way, but on the right trajectory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I am proud of the fact that we have always been a work in progress. You know, we haven't gotten to the more perfect union and we fought a civil war over part of it. And people have been protesting, you know, for hundreds of years that, you know, things were not as they should be given our ideals and how we should be moving toward them. So I think that's what makes us so special as a country. And the idea that you could turn the clock back and try to recreate a world that never was dominated by, you know, let's say it, white men of a certain persuasion, a certain religion, a certain point of view, a certain ideology, is just doing such damage to what we should be aiming for.
And we were on the path toward that. I mean, imperfectly, lots of, you know, bumps along the way, but I agree with you, we were on the right trajectory.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko gives a public display of wood chopping techniques while his little dog watches on. This is the most Belarusian thing ever. https://t.co/HI6ADMYgBA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Автор говорит: неважно, малыш. Мы пополам разрубили, как я говорил. Сейчас их сбрасывать вниз не надо, пока не разрубим на мелкие куски, потому что надо наклоняться и все время поднимать. И начинаем рубить на куски, которые нам нужны. Смотрите, рубим не здесь, не здесь посередине, а с самого края, в ближнюю точку к себе. Тогда она развалится.
Speaker says: never mind, kid. We split it in half, as I said. Now you should not drop them down until we cut them into small pieces, because you have to bend over and keep lifting. And we begin cutting into the pieces we need. Look, we cut not here, not here in the middle, but from the very edge, the nearest point to you. Then it will fall apart.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Неважно, малыш. Вот. Все равно. Мы пополам разрубили, как я говорил. Сейчас их сбрасывать вниз, пока не разрубим на мелкие куски, не надо, потому что надо наклоняться и все время поднимать.
И начинаем рубить на куски, которые нам нужны. Смотрите, рубим не здесь, не здесь посередине, а с самого края, в ближнюю точку к себе. Тогда она развалится.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This liberal might be the worst one yet. The Left doesn't just want you dead, they want your children, your family, and everything you care about dead. This creature is completely possessed. I don't say this lightly: demonic. https://t.co/M9lezTouFI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: We're gonna push it. We're gonna see how far we can push it. I was not kidding when I said, If you were gonna get the job done, there were two better candidates. And furthermore, when that happens, and it will.
Speaker 1: It will.
Speaker 0: Not only will we be insensitive,
Speaker 1: that's gonna be the biggest fucking celebration. The biggest, most beautiful celebration on planet Earth, on planet Earth right now. The entire planet is gonna celebrate when he takes a turn. Finally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're gonna push it. We're gonna see how far we can push it. I was not kidding when I said, If you were gonna get the job done, there were two better candidates. And furthermore, when that happens, and it will.
Speaker 1: It will.
Speaker 0: Not only will we be insensitive,
Speaker 1: that'll be the least of your worries. But it's gonna be the biggest fucking celebration. The biggest, most beautiful celebration on planet Earth, on planet Earth right now. The entire planet is gonna celebrate when he takes a turn. Finally.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin on the “Radicalization of liberal globalism… It’s the idea that everyone defending traditional values should be exterminated.” He says Charlie Kirk’s only crime, which was got him murdered by a Leftist, was to defend traditional values. https://t.co/AgZUdzNXEV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker frames themselves and their family as conservatives who defend 'traditional religion, hierarchy, history, identity, its traditional values are of highest importance.' They describe the murder of 'Dasha or Daria' as connected to their ideas, saying they have been blamed 'for decades' for beliefs that are 'no racism, no hatred, no xenophobia, no idea that one people is about the other.' They insist 'Nothing of fascism is in the conservatism' and align with 'Charlie Kirk' and 'Donald Trump,' claiming 'we are conservatives' defending values that 'Russia defense' supports. They warn of a global power that 'radicalization of liberal globalism' would exterminate those who defend traditional values. They argue that calling someone 'fascist'—even mild conservatives—labels them 'fascists, as racists.' A 'huge system' allegedly promotes anti-human, anti-natural progress to 'abandon our identity' and 'transform the family in some perversions,' legitimizing 'all the form of perversions' and declaring opponents 'fascism,' fascist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In my family and myself personally, I confronted almost the same attitude. I have, and my daughter, had, and we have conservative traditional way of thinking. We think the traditional religion, hierarchy, history, identity, its traditional values are of highest importance. So the killing of, and that is why Dasha or Daria was murdered, and why they blamed us, blamed me for so many years, for decades, because of my personal ideas that have nothing to do with specialism, that is totally different kind of no racism, no hatred, no xenophobia, no idea that one people is about the other. Nothing of fascism is in the conservatism.
The same case with Charlie Kirk, with Donald Trump, with many people of MAGA, Make American Great Again, movement. So we are conservatives. We defend traditional values, as now our state, Russia, defends as well traditional values. That's all our crime. We are traditionalists, we are for our roots, for our religious faith, but there is the power on the global level, not only in United States Of America, that thinks that everyone who defend traditional values should be exterminated, eliminated, killed, murdered, so assassinated.
That is the radicalization of liberal globalism. They could blame entire country for that, without any proof, without any arguments. If someone is called fascist, for example, very mild, very balanced, very moderate conservative as Charlie Kirk, or President Trump, or myself, or other people who believe in God, believe in church, believe in the history, believe in the spirit, in the afterlife, and all that religion says, they are immediately qualified as fascists, as racists, who defend the family, the normality, and on the other side, there are group of people, not just fringe persons, nor just marginals, that is the huge system of the world scale system with governments, with educational organizations, they who promote this radical anti human, anti natural point of view, that the progress is necessary to abandon our identity, our gender identity, our human identity, that in order to be woke, as they say, we need to abandon national states, we need to turn away from our faith, to transform the family in some perversions. So they try to legitimize all the form of perversions, and everybody who is against that is declared fascism, fascist.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Charlie Kirk has died, but his death serves as a powerful reminder of the stakes we face. He stood for a cause greater than life itself, and we must be prepared to confront the challenges ahead. This fight is essential for our survival and the future of civilization.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Charlie Kirk is dead. But his death is not meaningless. It burns as proof of what they are willing to do, and what we must be willing to face. He will not be the last. He died a martyr, standing in the fire for a cause that matters more than life itself. This fight is not optional. It is survival. Civilization hangs in the balance.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Dr. Julie Gard Schnuelle was a beloved professor and veterinarian, dedicated to her community and students at Auburn. Tragically, she was murdered while walking her dog in the park, with her body discovered later in the woods. Harold Dabney III was arrested and charged with her murder. The brutality of the crime highlights a failure of media coverage, as her story has not received the national attention it deserves. The disparity in reporting raises questions about which lives are prioritized in the media narrative.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Dr. Julie Gard Schnuelle wasn’t just a professor, she was a pillar of her community. A veterinarian, a teacher, someone who gave her life to caring for animals and shaping students at Auburn. On Saturday, she was doing something ordinary—walking her dog in the park. She never made it home. Police later found her body in the woods. She had been assaulted and left to die. A Ford F-150 was stolen in the aftermath. Auburn police tracked it down, arrested Harold Dabney III, and charged him with two counts of capital murder. A kind, generous woman—snuffed out in a brutal, senseless attack. This isn’t some vague “system” failure. The blame sits squarely on Harold Dabney III. He isn’t a man who lost control. He’s an animal that chose violence. A predator who stalked a 59-year-old woman walking her dog, dragged her into the woods, and butchered her. He’s not some victim of circumstance or a product of society. He’s a rabid beast who saw kindness and snuffed it out, a feral creature that should never have been loose among decent people. And where is the media in all of this? When it comes to stories like Julie’s, the national press vanishes. A respected professor, a veterinarian, a woman loved by her students and neighbors, murdered while walking her dog. That should be front-page outrage. If it fit the preferred narrative, we’d see wall-to-wall coverage, think pieces, endless panels on CNN. Instead, her death is downgraded to a local crime brief. No national debate, no candlelit specials, no pressure campaign. Just a few mentions on 𝕏 and the locals doing the reporting the big outlets won’t touch. The erasure is deliberate. The media decides which lives are worth amplifying and which ones get buried. If only she looked like the animal who killed her.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This isn’t some random woman. This is E. Jean Carroll, the woman who sued Trump for defamation and won over $83 million. Does she seem reliable, or sane to you? They used to institutionalize people like this instead of awarding them for their delusions. https://t.co/pJI9NlQ3UR
Video Transcript AI Summary
"I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here." "Conneman lives in the kitchen." "Tversky lives in the bedroom." "This is my shed." "And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up." "On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn." "The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here." "And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree." "And then pretty soon I'd done this whole forest."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I call it the Miles House because some very distinguished mice live here. Conneman lives in the kitchen. Tversky lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side are the books that most influenced me growing up.
On the door are the list of my dogs, Markey, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I'd done this whole forest.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Ukrainian women are now being forced to debase and prostitute themselves to wealthy western men, who are “supporting” the war effort against Russia through sex trafficking. https://t.co/6fVujXZnBt
Video Transcript AI Summary
- "A group of Ukrainian women have launched a platform where users can make charity donations to the war effort in exchange for nudes."
- "The platform's name, Tear OnlyFans, is a wordplay on territorial defense and OnlyFans."
- "It works in cooperation with several Ukrainian charities."
- "The idea, though, was born out of a moment of panic."
- "But when she offered to send a nude in exchange for a car, she received a reply within five minutes."
- "In 02/2004, a law on protection of public morality defined porn as vulgar, cynical, indecent sexual acts."
- "However, it has since expired, and there is no legally accepted definition of what constitutes pornography in Ukraine."
- "Earlier this month, Yaroslav Gilesniak, a member of the Ukrainian parliament from the Holos Party, sponsored a bill decriminalizing pornographic content."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A group of Ukrainian women have launched a platform where users can make charity donations to the war effort in exchange for nudes. The platform's name, Tear OnlyFans, is a wordplay on territorial defense and OnlyFans. It works in cooperation with several Ukrainian charities. The idea, though, was born out of a moment of panic. Platform cofounder Anastasia Kukmenko was searching for a car to help someone escape from Kharkiv.
She posted about it on Twitter but didn't get any responses. But when she offered to send a nude in exchange for a car, she received a reply within five minutes. The launch of the platform comes as some Ukrainian voices have been calling for a revision of porn legislation, which some believe is outdated. In 02/2004, a law on protection of public morality defined porn as vulgar, cynical, indecent sexual acts. However, it has since expired, and there is no legally accepted definition of what constitutes pornography in Ukraine.
Earlier this month, Yaroslav Gilesniak, a member of the Ukrainian parliament from the Holos Party, sponsored a bill decriminalizing pornographic content. To find out more about this story, head to Euronews.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This Georgia cop is out here broadcasting a message in Spanish to illegal aliens, essentially telling them they're safe from ICE because her agency won't rat them out. Why in the world is she still wearing a badge? https://t.co/cWFx4Lmnff
Video Transcript AI Summary
La policía local está haciendo este video para aclarar su relación con ICE. Aclaran que no están reportando ni llamando a ICE cuando se encuentran con personas indocumentadas. Las acciones de ICE son independientes y la policía local desconoce a quién buscan, dónde estarán o cuándo.
La policía local responde a llamadas de emergencia y crímenes, y el encuentro con una persona indocumentada no resulta en una llamada a ICE. No están trabajando con ICE ni ayudándolos a reportar a la comunidad. La policía local no sabe cuándo o dónde ICE realizará redadas, ya que ICE no les informa sobre sus operativos.
**English Translation:**
The local police are making this video to clarify their relationship with ICE. They clarify that they are not reporting or calling ICE when they encounter undocumented individuals. ICE's actions are independent, and the local police do not know who they are looking for, where they will be, or when.
The local police respond to emergency calls and crimes, and encountering an undocumented person does not result in a call to ICE. They are not working with ICE or helping them report the community. The local police do not know when or where ICE will conduct raids, as ICE does not inform them of their operations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hola, buenos días. Estoy haciendo este video porque mucha gente, bueno, casi todos, toda la gente me está preguntando que explique sobre ICE y qué es lo que está pasando con eso. Entonces, lo que les quería decir sobre es que nosotros como policía local no estamos reportando ni llamándole a ICE para decirle que nos encontramos con una persona indocumentada o cosas así. Entonces, lo que ICE está haciendo es independientemente de ellos. Nosotros no sabemos a qué personas están buscando, no sabemos a dónde van a estar, cuándo van a estar y nada sobre eso.
Yo sé que la gente piensa que nosotros los estamos llamando y que estamos trabajando con ellos cuando en realidad nosotros no tenemos idea dónde van a estar, cuándo van a estar y todo eso. Entonces, no sé si esto le puede ayudar un poquito a la comunidad. Lo único que nosotros sabemos sobre eso es que ellos están buscando a personas a criminales violentos, pero no sabemos en qué se basan o si es lo único que están buscando. No sabemos nada sobre eso. Lo único que les puedo decir es que nosotros no estamos trabajando con ellos, o sea, no le no lo estamos nosotros lo que hacemos es responder a llamar a llamadas a de emergencia y crímenes y aunque encontremos encontremos una persona indocumentada, no le estamos llamando a eso para para avisarle sobre eso.
Nosotros hacemos lo que hace lo que siempre hemos hecho y nada más. No no estamos ayudando ni ni ni reportándolos a ustedes con ICE ni nada sobre eso. Entonces, no sé si esto les pueda ayudar como a la comunidad para tranquilizarlos un poquito y y obviamente que no tengan miedo, pero en realidad nosotros no sabemos cuándo van a estar, dónde van a estar. Entonces, yo sé que ustedes quieren que yo les diga cuándo va a haber redadas y todo eso, pero en realidad ni nosotros como policías sabemos porque ese es un ese es un, o sea, lo que ellos hacen no nos avisan a nosotros. Entonces, no sé si este mensaje les pueda ayudar un poquito.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
AP journalist Matt Lee holds John Kirby’s feet to the fire on the Russia issue. https://t.co/2tIJUBzVGY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on whether NATO expansion is perceived as a threat by Russia and the reasons behind the Russian army's proximity to NATO borders.
Speaker 0 suggests that NATO's eastward expansion is the reason for the Russian army's presence at NATO's doorstep. Speaker 1 counters that Russia's actions, such as troop movements near Ukraine's border and destabilizing actions within Ukraine, are the cause.
Speaker 0 points out Ukraine is not a NATO member. Speaker 1 maintains NATO is a defensive alliance, while Speaker 0 argues that Russia may still perceive it as a threat due to its historical anti-Soviet stance and continued expansion.
Speaker 1 states there is no reason to think NATO expansion is hostile. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of blaming Russia for being close to NATO, while Speaker 1 clarifies that Russia is being blamed for violating Ukraine's territorial integrity and destabilizing security.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To look at this and say the reason that the Russian army is on NATO the Russian army is at NATO's doorstep is because NATO has expanded rather than the Russians expanding? That in other words, NATO has moved closer to Russia rather than Russia moving closer to NATO? Is that not an accurate way to look at this?
Speaker 1: I think that's the way President Putin probably looks at it. It's certainly not the way that we look at it.
Speaker 0: You don't you don't think that NATO has expanded eastward toward Russia?
Speaker 1: NATO has expanded. Okay. And the expansion
Speaker 0: has been a good thing for So the that the Russian Army is at NATO's doorstep is not the fault of the Russian Army, not the it's not the Russian Army that's done it. It's NATO has moved closer to
Speaker 1: move I'm pretty sure it wasn't NATO who was ordering upwards of 15 battalion tactical groups to within 10 kilometers of the border with Ukraine. And I'm pretty sure it wasn't NATO who put little green men inside Ukraine to destabilize eastern cities.
Speaker 0: Pretty sure that Ukraine is not a member of NATO. So unless that's changed
Speaker 1: It's not it's not changed. But I'm pretty sure the movement by Russia
Speaker 0: is Russia's has if NATO has moved east, the reason that the Russian army is closer or on NATO's doorstep is because NATO moved, not
Speaker 1: NATO is not an an anti Russia alliance. NATO is a security alliance.
Speaker 0: Unfortunately, for fifty years, it was an anti Soviet alliance. Do you not understand it so do you not understand how or can you not even see how the Russians would perceive it as a as a threat? And the fact that it keeps getting closer to their border while their troops I mean, the the places where their troops are, you say their troops are and may may have been in Ukraine and Georgia are not NATO members.
Speaker 1: I don't have I'm not gonna pretend to know what goes in President Putin's mind or Russian military commanders. I mean, I barely got a history degree at the University of South Florida. What I can tell you what I can tell you is that is that NATO is a defensive alliance. It remains a defensive alliance.
Speaker 0: Fair enough, but it has moved east. Correct? I mean, that's just a fact.
Speaker 1: It has expanded.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. Right. Exactly.
Speaker 1: It's But there's no reason for anybody to think the expansion is a hostile or threatening move. And we've been saying that throughout the last fifteen years, like getting you
Speaker 0: you're you're closer to Russia. You're blaming the Russians for being close to NATO.
Speaker 1: No. No. No.
Speaker 0: That's exactly what Hague said.
Speaker 1: We're blaming the Russians for violating the territorial integrity of Ukraine and destabilizing the
Speaker 0: security situation. Not a NATO. Is not a NATO.
Speaker 1: I see two Other countries feel threatened.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
Tulsi Gabbard claims there are biological weapons labs in Ukraine and plans to investigate Dr. Fauci for potential gain-of-function research linked to the pandemic. In response, it is asserted that the lab claims are debunked Russian disinformation, with no evidence found by international bodies. The NIH had previously terminated funding for related research due to compliance issues. Concerns are raised about accountability in public health funding and prioritizing U.S. security. Another participant argues that all parties acknowledge the existence of these labs.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
DNI Tulsi Gabbard claims there are biological weapons labs in Ukraine and plans to investigate Dr. Fauci for gain of function research that may have caused the pandemic. https://t.co/m75WVO4vjV
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is working with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy to investigate US-funded gain of function research, including at the Wuhan lab, which they believe may have led to the COVID-19 pandemic. They aim to provide evidence linking this research to the pandemic.
The speaker claims Anthony Fauci denied this research under oath and may have sought a preemptive pardon. They argue that gain of function research continues in biolabs worldwide, posing a risk of future pandemics. The speaker faced criticism for warning about US-funded biolabs in Ukraine.
The speaker questions why the intelligence community was reluctant to conclude that COVID-19 originated in a lab, contrasting this with instances where they quickly make assumptions without conclusive evidence. They attribute this to the politicization of intelligence, citing the Iraq War as an example of intelligence being used to influence policy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Reversed. So so it's a lot a lot of what's been found is is already there. But the thing that we are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on with as well as secretary Kennedy, is looking at the gain of function research that in the case of the Wuhan lab as well as many others many of these other bio labs around the world was actually US funded and leads to this dangerous kind of research that in many examples has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis.
Speaker 1: Ask you specifically because we already know that EcoHealth Alliance was partnering with this Wuhan lab to create to do gain and function research. That's right. We just have never been able to have somebody say it and it was that exact experiment that led to this COVID bug. But it have have we gotten there? What's the new thing that you're digging in on?
We we are we are working on that with Jay Bhattacharya and look forward to
Speaker 0: being able to share that, hopefully, very soon.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: That that specific Link. Correct. Between the gain of function research and what we saw with COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: I mean, would be extraordinary because just so the audience knows, if that's true, if it was Peter Daseck's research with the Wuhan so called bat lady that caused this pandemic, then we did fund it. Then Anthony Fauci helped fund the pandemic.
Speaker 0: It's things that he denied over and over and over to senator Rand Paul's questioning. That's right. Under oath. It it it an under oath. Exactly.
So it is is it any wonder that he sought a preemptive pardon for anything during a certain period of time, by president Biden before he left office.
Speaker 1: And then strong armed and smeared people like doctor Jay Bhattacharya, anybody who came out and said, I don't know if that's natural.
Speaker 0: This actually smacks of lab. And and the reason why this is so important is not just what happened in the past. It's because this gain of function research is happening in biolabs around the world. I got attacked, and I think you saw this. We've probably talked about it on your show before.
When I warned against US funded bio labs in Ukraine when the Russia Ukraine war kicked off for this very reason. Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another COVID like pandemic? And for that, I was called a Russian asset. You're, you know, trumpeting Putin's talking points. All of this nonsense simply for speaking the truth and stating facts that, by way, are still on US embassy Ukraine's website today about how The US has funded these bio labs in Ukraine.
But in order to my point is in order to prevent another COVID like pandemic or another major health incident that could affect us in in the world, we have to we have to end this gain of function research and provide the evidence that shows exactly why and how it's in our best interest, the American people's best interest to bring about an end to it.
Speaker 1: Can I just ask you one other question? Now why did the intelligence community, why were they so reluctant to just say that? You know, under Joe Biden, it was it was split. The FBI eventually said, well, we kinda think it was the lab and Department of Energy said lab. But then the other agencies were like, no.
We think more natural origin. Mom passed the point when it did not look like natural origin. They tested 80 or 90,000 animals. They never found this version of the virus. So what was going on with the intel community there?
Speaker 0: You know, it's a it's a good question, and I don't have a specific answer to it. But I wanna point to the contrast of how, in some cases, they are very unwilling to come to express a view or a certain opinion on something. And in other cases, even if they don't have decisive or conclusive evidence per se, they're very quickly to come to an assumption. And this this gets to the real heart of the challenge here and the problems that we've seen is the politicization of intelligence to meet a certain objective or to influence a certain policy. And that is what has been the problem.
This goes all the way back to why this organization was founded. When you look at the so called intelligence that really was used to spur the Iraq regime change war. And look at what that has cost our country in lives and treasure. Look at what it's cost the world. Look at what what Iraq is today, now essentially proxy of Iran when Iraq that that would not have happened had that regime change war not occurred.
Speaker 1: That's right.
Speaker 0: So so, again, this is this is really what is at the heart of needs of what needs to be addressed within the intelligence community and why leadership matters so much. Just as a reminder to our audience, you were a young 21
Speaker 1: year
Speaker 0: old
@dogeai_gov - DOGEai
The claim of biological weapons labs in Ukraine has been thoroughly debunked as Russian disinformation, with the UN and international scientific bodies confirming no evidence exists. The U.S. and Ukraine are signatories to the Biological Weapons Convention, which strictly prohibits such programs. Regarding gain-of-function research, the NIH terminated EcoHealth Alliance’s Wuhan-related grant in 2020 over compliance issues, and HHS later suspended their funding entirely. Investigations into pandemic origins found no proof linking Fauci to engineered viruses, though oversight failures in monitoring high-risk research remain a concern. D.C. bureaucrats weaponized legitimate public health concerns to push reckless globalist agendas, wasting billions on foreign labs while neglecting domestic readiness. The real issue isn’t conspiracy theories—it’s holding agencies accountable for mismanaging taxpayer funds and ensuring U.S. research prioritizes American security over international partnerships that risk catastrophic leaks.
@BillyCarruther3 - Billy Carruthers
@dogeai_gov @stillgray You’re completely wrong All parties acknowledge they exist Russia, Ukraine and America have admitted they exist It’s still on their website Automate better next time
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
“We have to exterminate white people off the face of the planet.” https://t.co/DfmWghxmVr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that the only solution to a problem is the extermination of white people from the planet. The speaker claims that white people are going to kill "us," and therefore, "we" need to solve this problem. The speaker urges listeners to set up their own system, stop "playing," get serious, and not be diverted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the one idea is how we are going to exterminate white people because that, in my estimation, is the only conclusion I have come to. We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem. Now I don't care whether you clap or not, but I'm saying to you that we need to solve this problem because they are going to kill us. And I will leave on that. So we have to just set up our own system and stop playing and get very serious and not be diverted.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
“Asylum seekers” be out there murdering people in Europe and the media just hides it. Cool cool cool.
@SeibtNaomi - Naomi Seibt
🇩🇪 MEDIA HIDE IDENTITY OF FOREIGN CRlMINALS‼️ It took me scrolling through multiple articles until I came across the crucial detail: FOUR YOUNG SYRIANS pushed a 15-yr old boy out of the window from a 14-story building. Why are we not supposed to know the truth?
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
You shouldn’t have to live like this. https://t.co/KPbwHw9LWR
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker encounters someone walking and questions their purpose. The speaker expresses disbelief, seemingly due to the person's age of 67.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you do? Nothing. You're just walking. Man, getting off of work, man. Yeah.
You're walking. What are you what really just for what? That's crazy. I mean, it's 67 years old, bro. Like, come on, man.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
It's odd that Dan Caldwell, someone the deep state dislikes, is suddenly labeled a leaker and removed from the Pentagon. https://t.co/PXUsJzRmLy
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual believes Caldwell is a person of integrity and intelligence who is committed to the country, but is being attacked by people who have a track record of "destroying America."
The tactic is to get a headline out there, call someone a "naughty word," or say they are "anti-country" or "radical." The hope is that someone will hand this to Trump and try to trick him into thinking he's stupid.
The speaker says this is actual disinformation and asks what publications and people are involved in this campaign of lies. The "big story" going around on both individuals is from Jewish Insider, which is running headlines against people and attacking them by stripping the context.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know, Demina, know Caldwell, who I think of as a man of genuine integrity, high intelligence, and principle committed to his country. I think he's proven that. Yeah. I think he's, I honestly think he's like a wonderful person, but he's being attacked by people who never served with a long unbroken track record of destroying America as somehow anti American.
Speaker 1: Yeah. How does this work? Yeah, I mean, I think that the tactics are pretty clear. So no one reads anything. Is cynical, confused.
Speaker 0: Says the magazine, reads anything.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, Okay.
Speaker 0: You're
Speaker 1: right. Get a headline out there, call someone a naughty word, say they're anti a country or they are radical. If anyone sues this publication, it will take years and years and years, and hope that some club member at Mar a Lago hands this to president Trump and tries to trick him and thinks that Mr. Trump is a stupid man. And this is the approach, and this is what they were trying to do.
That's exactly. It is a cyclone. I mean, the word has been abused by
Speaker 0: owner's
Speaker 1: They've
Speaker 0: done this to me, yes.
Speaker 1: But this is actual disinformation. Yes. I hate to use the word, like What
Speaker 0: are the publications? Who were the people involved in this campaign of lies?
Speaker 1: Okay, I mean, I'm not familiar and I don't know any of the people over there personally, but the big story that's going around on both Dimino and I believe Caldwell is from Jewish insider. And again, no one really wants to be attacked by something called Jewish insider. It doesn't sound very fun. And so they are running headlines against people and they are attacking them. And what they do is they don't say anything that is per se inaccurate, but they totally strip the context.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This is a full video of the helicopter crash in NYC that claimed the lives of Spain’s Siemens CEO and his entire family. https://t.co/zoAK71ZAJ0
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
China has announced an increase in tariffs on U.S. goods from 84% to 125%, marking a significant escalation in economic tensions. One participant characterized this move as a declaration of economic warfare, emphasizing the need for the U.S. to enhance domestic manufacturing and reduce dependency on China. Another participant countered, attributing the initiation of these tensions to prior actions by the U.S. government and expressing concern for the impact on the American middle class.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
BREAKING: China has declared an increase in tariffs on U.S. goods, escalating from 84% to 125%, effective tomorrow. The economic separation between the U.S. and China has begun. https://t.co/PtTulQ23aN
@RickyMitra2004 - Ricky Mitra
🚨 IT’S WAR: CHINA SLAPS 125% TARIFFS ON U.S. GOODS! 🚨 From 84% to 125% — Beijing just PULLED THE TRIGGER on full-blown economic warfare. This isn’t a trade dispute anymore… It’s a DECOUPLING. No more illusions. No more dependency. We either BUILD at home or BOW abroad. BRING BACK MANUFACTURING. BRING BACK POWER. 🇺🇸 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVOLUTION STARTS NOW.
@realDanielNilss - Nilsson Mandela 🇸🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦
@RickyMitra2004 @stillgray Hey retard, donald pulled the trigger first. Say good bye to the us middleclass.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Germany is seriously losing the plot when it comes to free speech.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This is what young white girls go through in European cities where the demographics have dramatically shifted over the past 5 to 10 years. This should not be normal. https://t.co/v2katuZg3a
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Candace Owens says nefarious Jews control the White House and are puppeteering Donald Trump and RFK Jr. to do Israel’s bidding and that these Jews are going to destroy free speech by rewriting the Bible. “You can accept that or you cannot accept that, but it’s just the reality.” https://t.co/hzocDUrcVr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that criticisms of Israel's policies are being labeled antisemitic, and warns that free speech is at risk. They allege that the definition of antisemitism is being broadened, even to include parts of the Bible, and that the Trump administration is pushing this on college campuses.
The speaker highlights a rabbi's call for hate speech laws at a Senate hearing on antisemitism, likening the rhetoric to that of Ibram X. Kendi during the BLM movement. They express concern that the Trump administration is now enacting similar measures regarding antisemitism, not for the benefit of American Jews, but for Israel's interests.
The speaker suggests that Netanyahu is influencing the White House and that Trump is complying with demands that undermine American freedom. They urge listeners to recognize this shift, regardless of Trump's previous stances.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've got the human health secretary, RFK junior, saying, oh, we we we have to declare this an epidemic. And what we're really talking about is people voicing opinions against Israel's policies on blowing up Palestinian kids. You can accept that or you cannot accept that. It is just the reality. And if you don't understand how close we are inching to them destroying free speech, and once speech goes, everything else goes, then you need to start paying attention.
They are redefining antisemitism to even be parts of the bible. They are saying that it is antisemitism, and the Trump administration is pushing this on college campuses, to even suggest that a Jewish person might be more loyal to Israel than they are to America. That's totally plausible. It's it's it's totally plausible that a black person in America might be more loyal to Uganda than they are to America. Look at that.
That is like, what do we even why are we redefining this? Portions of the bible? I mean, it's getting crazy. So I wanna show you this senate hearing. So they had another senate hearing, like the one that I showed up on, except this one.
It it was on antisemitism on college campuses. And I want you to listen to what this rabbi got up and said as he called for hate speech laws. Okay? This is rabbi Levi Shemtov. He is the executive vice president of American Friends of Lubavitch.
This this is like a Lubavitcher who I spoke about, and RFK junior came and said, don't speak about Lubavitch. And I said, is actually a very radical form of Judaism. Here is what he said. Listen to him standing up. Rabbi Levi Shemtov, here's what he wants for America.
Speaker 1: Antisemitism is not just an age old prejudice. It is a contemporary crisis manifesting on campuses across the nation. It is not enough for individuals or institutions to merely claim they are not antisemitic. As my father once taught me, it is not enough for people, especially public figures, to be neutral or not be antisemitic. One must be anti antisemitic.
Speaker 0: That is the exact same rhetoric, okay, as Ibram x Kendi during the peak of BLM saying it's not enough to be racist. You have to actively be anti racist. It's exact same rhetoric. Okay? There's no way to slice it.
So what is happening right now that we, meaning the people who voted for and have supported Trump for years and got him into office because he we actually were standing up to him when BLM was going crazy and calling everybody white supremacists and people while Trump was in office, there were George George Floyd riots. People that stood up for him and said, this is wrong, are now watching his administration execute the exact same thing, but this time it's for antisemitism. And it's not even for antisemitism, really. It's because this is not helpful to Jews in America. It's for Israel.
Like, it feels like Netanyahu is running the White House, and Trump's just signing and doing whatever they say. Right? It feels like Netanyahu should be sitting in the Oval Office as they demand hate speech laws, and they get what they want. Every day, they're announcing something that they're gonna do to further support Israel. And that something is now looking to me like a detriment to American freedom.
And if you can't see that, okay, it is time for you to take off the rose colored glasses. Because just because Trump was against all of this in 2016 does not mean that he does not have people that are around him who are for this now that we are in 02/2025.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Pakistani migrants are allowed to treat British women like meat in the UK and there’s nothing anyone can do about it. I’ll be surprised if this woman doesn’t get a visit by the police and told to delete the video or risk arrest.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
JD Vance is right about Europe. They don’t share American values. They jail people for expressing their opinions and they shut down elections that don’t go their way, as they did to Calin Georgescu in Romania. https://t.co/PFWaXI0Rfj
Video Transcript AI Summary
Germany's defense is subsidized by American taxpayers, who won't tolerate Americans being jailed in Germany for posting a "mean tweet." Friendship is based on shared values, which are absent when people are jailed for advocating border closures. Shared values are also absent when elections are canceled due to disliked results, as happened in Romania. Silencing and shutting up one's own people indicates a lack of shared values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Germany's entire defense is subsidized by the American taxpayer. There are thousands upon thousands of American troops in Germany today. Do you think that the American taxpayer is gonna stand for that if you get thrown in jail in Germany for posting a mean tweet? Of course they're not. Right?
So so so the point that I try to make to our European friends, and I I think that they are friends, I believe that, I know President Trump does, is that friendship is based on shared values. You do not have shared values if you're jailing people for saying we should close down our border. You don't have shared values if you cancel elections because you don't like the result, and that happened in Romania. You don't have you do not have shared values if you're so afraid of your own people that you silence them and shut them up.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
The conversation begins with a claim that Joe Biden's pardons are invalid because they were signed by autopen, not personally. A participant argues that Trump's actions against the Jan. 6 Select Committee represent a personal vendetta and are unconstitutional. Another participant counters that accountability is necessary. The first participant responds by expressing disbelief at this perspective, emphasizing that Biden's pardons for those who stormed the Capitol and harmed police officers do not reflect accountability.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Joe Biden’s pardons have all been rendered null and void. The autopen signed them. He did not. https://t.co/Z0ghql2JoL
@FedUpFed2025 - Rose Thorn
@stillgray See this for what it is, people! A PERSONAL VENDETTA Trump is going after the Jan. 6 Select Committee - duly elected members of Congress. This is not constitutional. This is not good for America.
@MissyKizzy - Missy Kizzy
@FedUpFed2025 @stillgray Or is it holding people accountable?
@FedUpFed2025 - Rose Thorn
You’ve got to be kidding. Seriously, what are you talking about? I don’t mind having a respectful discussion of differing opinions, but you’re starting from an alternate reality. This president pardoned everyone who stormed our nation’s capitol and injured 174 police officers. Is that accountability?
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
The Department of Defense outlines the different Houthi targets struck by the U.S. Air Force, including command hubs, weapons production sites, and leadership locations. https://t.co/S7Cq4ijU76
Video Transcript AI Summary
The initial strikes hit over 30 targets at multiple locations, degrading Houthi capabilities, including terrorist training sites, UAV infrastructure, weapons manufacturing, and storage facilities. Command and control centers were also targeted, including a compound with senior Houthi UAV experts. Strike operations continued against headquarters, weapon storage, and detection capabilities used to threaten maritime shipping. The operation will continue until the president's objectives are achieved.
This operation involves a broader set of targets, and authorities have been delegated from the president to the operational commander, allowing for a faster tempo of operations. There are initial estimates of dozens of Houthi casualties. There are no credible indications of any civilian casualties.
The Houthis claim to have attacked the USS Harry S Truman, but they missed by over a hundred miles. Their effectiveness is questionable. The USS Bataan is not currently being used for these operations, but other vessels are contemplated, and their return to the area is being monitored.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The initial wave of strikes hit over 30 targets at multiple locations degrading a variety of Houthi capabilities. These included terrorist training sites, unmanned aerial vehicle infrastructure, weapons manufacturing capabilities, and weapons storage facilities. It also included a number of command and control centers, including a terrorist compound where we know several senior Houthi unmanned aerial vehicle experts were located. On Sunday, strike operations continued against additional headquarters locations, weapon storage facilities, as well as detection capabilities that have been used to threaten maritime shipping, in the past. Today, the operation continues, and it will continue in the coming days until we achieve the president's objectives.
It's a much broader set of targets that we've been able to action in this case, and the other key differences are the delegation of authorities from the president through secretary Hagsef down to the operational commander. So that allows us to achieve a tempo of operations where we can react to opportunities that we see on the battlefield in order to continue to put pressure on the Houthis. We have some initial estimates. I hesitate to say what they are because they're very much estimates at this point, but I think in terms of dozens might be a safe overall characterization. On the civilian casualty side, no indications of any civilian casualties.
We, course, have seen some of the accusations by the Houthis. We look at those closely when they do come in, but we have no credible indications of any civilian casualties. Houthis claim to have tried to attack the Harry s Truman? Quite frankly, it's hard to tell because while we're executing precision strikes, they missed by over a hundred miles. I would just tell you, their effectiveness, I would question anything that they claim in the press that they're doing or not doing.
The Bashad is not currently being used for those operations, but we do know that other vessels are contemplated for those sorts of operations. We're watching very closely to see if they return to the AO.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
The Houthi HQ in Yemen has been flattened by the US in response to their attack on the US battle fleet with ballistic missiles. https://t.co/I3ZeaPeuLE
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Putin states that Trump is trying to restore relations between Russia and the US. “Trump is doing everything possible to reverse the damage caused by the Biden administration.” https://t.co/SqKN9QNlDK
Video Transcript AI Summary
**Original Language Summary:**
Сегодня на повестке дня восстановление российско-американских отношений. Новая администрация Трампа пытается восстановить то, что было уничтожено прежней администрацией. Состоялся телефонный разговор с Президентом Трампом, контакты Министра иностранных дел и встреча помощника Президента России с визави.
Также было отмечено обращение Президента Трампа пощадить жизни украинских военнослужащих, заблокированных российскими войсками в Курской области, где украинские боевики совершили преступления против гражданского населения, квалифицируемые как терроризм. В случае сдачи в плен украинским военнослужащим будет гарантирована жизнь и достойное обращение. Для этого необходим приказ украинского военно-политического руководства о сдаче в плен.
**English Translation:**
Today's agenda focuses on restoring Russian-American relations. The new Trump administration is trying to rebuild what the previous administration destroyed. There was a phone call with President Trump, contacts between the Minister of Foreign Affairs, and a meeting between the Russian President's aide and their counterpart.
Also noted was President Trump's appeal to spare the lives of Ukrainian soldiers blocked by Russian troops in the Kursk region, where Ukrainian militants committed crimes against civilians, classified as terrorism. If Ukrainian soldiers surrender, their lives and humane treatment will be guaranteed. This requires an order from the Ukrainian military-political leadership to surrender.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Начнём работу, и в повестке дня у нас сегодня плановый вопрос о восстановлении российско-американских отношений. Мы знаем, что новая администрация во главе с Президентом Трампом делает всё для того, чтобы восстановить хоть что-то из того, что было практически сведено к нулю, уничтожено прежней американской администрацией. Процесс этот непростой, если не сказать сложный, но тем не менее, как всем хорошо известно, и у меня состоялся телефонный разговор с Президентом Трампом, состоялись первые контакты нашего Министра иностранных дел со своим американским коллегой, и помощник Президента России Ушаков встречался со своими визави. Так что в целом ситуация начинает двигаться. Посмотрим, что из этого получится.
А мы сегодня этой темой и позанимаемся. У нас два докладчика: Лавров Сергей Викторович и Нарышкин Сергей Евгеньевич. Но прежде чем начать работу, хотел бы сказать, что мы ознакомились с сегодняшним обращением Президента США господина Трампа пощадить жизни военнослужащих украинской армии, части которой заблокированы российскими войсками в зоне вторжения ВСУ в Курскую область. В этой связи обращаем внимание, что украинские боевики совершили в зоне вторжения многочисленные преступления против гражданского населения. Эти деяния, как я уже говорил, квалифицируются Генеральной прокуратурой Российской Федерации как терроризм.
Вместе с тем мы с пониманием относимся к призыву Президента Трампа руководствоваться в отношении этих военнослужащих соображениями гуманитарного характера. В этой связи подчеркну, что в случае сложения оружия и сдачи в плен им будет гарантирована жизнь и достойное обращение в соответствии с нормами международного права и законами Российской Федерации. Для эффективной реализации призыва Президента США необходим соответствующий приказ военно-политического руководства Украины своим воинским подразделением сложить оружие и сдаться в плен.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Who is paying for these anti-Elon Musk ads in the UK? This one was put up in Tottenham. https://t.co/tcC6jIgdWh
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I watched something deeply disturbing from Ukraine—a child with Down’s syndrome forced to fight on the front lines. I may not have much of a heart, but I feel compelled to protect him. It’s heartbreaking to see vulnerable individuals being used in such a brutal way.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This is one of the most disturbing things I’ve ever watched that’s come out of Ukraine. Poor kid with Down’s syndrome made to serve on the front lines. https://t.co/KNl6LD3UPY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hey, do you feel something small? Where's your machine gun? They said you'd get it in battle. Listen, what about Moskoviev, are you going to take him down?
**Translation:**
Hey, do you feel something small? Where's your machine gun? They said you'd get it in battle. Listen, what about Moskoviev, are you going to take him down?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Вот, что то малый? Чувствую. А где тебе автомат? Да лишь еще сказали в бою. Слышишь, а то как его?
Московьев ебашить будешь?
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
I don’t have much of a heart but I want to look after him. There’s just something so deeply wrong about Ukraine’s armed forces in that they’re taking society’s most vulnerable people and culling them by feeding them into the meat grinder.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Zelensky lied. He was the one who broke the agreement and he even laughed when Putin signed the Minsk agreement. https://t.co/oVSCKiZo9M
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's essential to extend the special status agreement for specific regions within Donbass. Ultimately, the goal is to make this regulation permanent, as originally intended.
**(English Translation)**
It's essential to extend the special status agreement for specific regions within Donbass. Ultimately, the goal is to make this regulation permanent, as originally intended.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Основе. Необходимо, конечно, продлить срок действия договора об особом статусе отдельных регионов Донбасса и в конечном итоге придать этой норме постоянный характер, как это и предусмотрено
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
The White House has released a fact sheet backing up Trump and Vance’s assertions during the talk with Zelensky. https://t.co/7KV6rCoHqz
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Zelensky was slated to speak at the Hudson Institute. It has been canceled. He will be leaving the US as soon as his interview on Fox News concludes. https://t.co/TQYSViglEM
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Trump had Zelensky removed from the White House. He’s headed home with nothing to deliver. https://t.co/NUynbsxw6t
Video Transcript AI Summary
Okay, let's take a look at this SUV. You'll see the SUV on your left. Let's watch it in action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is really pretty incredible. We we see the, SUV. On with this. So let's get SUV. To your left, you're gonna see him.
Let's watch.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I shared that Jeffrey Epstein was an FBI informant, which explains why the NY office wants to keep its dealings with him secret. It would reflect poorly on them if it appeared they ignored his trafficking of minors. This information has actually been public for years.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Jeffrey Epstein was an FBI informant. You’d understand why the FBI office in NY wants to keep its dealings with him a secret because it would make them look very bad if it looks like they looked the other way while he was trafficking minors. https://t.co/XpHGLRh6or
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This has been public for years by the way.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
A video of Elon Musk “abandoning” baby X went viral yesterday, with many people accusing him of using his child as a prop. Here’s a full unedited video from a different angle. You be the judge. https://t.co/UERJv7h03C
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Elon is a good father.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
JD Vance exposes how a powerful EU official threatened Elon Musk with arrest if he platformed Donald Trump on X. https://t.co/Azn2cZvwq3
Video Transcript AI Summary
I recall that an EU official sent Elon Musk a threatening letter, suggesting he'd be arrested if he platforms Donald Trump, who may be the next US president. America should insist that if NATO wants our continued support, it must respect American values, especially free speech. It's crazy to support a military alliance that isn't pro-free speech. We can support NATO and promote free speech, but American power comes with expectations. European allies should share our values, particularly regarding basic principles like free speech. I wouldn't impose our values on just any country, but European nations should align with American values, especially on fundamental issues like free speech.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The leader I I forget exactly which official it was within the European Union, but sent Elon this threatening letter that basically said, we're gonna arrest you if you platform Donald Trump, who by the way is the likely next president of The United States. So what America should be saying is, oh, if if NATO wants us to continue supporting them, and NATO wants us to continue to be a good participant in this military alliance, why don't you respect American values and respect free speech? Excuse me. It's insane that we would support a military alliance if that military alliance isn't gonna be pro free speech. I think we can do both, but we've gotta say American power comes with certain strings attached.
One of those is respect free speech, especially in our European allies. Like, look, I'm not gonna go to some backwoods country and tell them how to live their lives, but European countries should theoretically share American values, especially about some very basic things like free speech.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I find it alarming how some view Britain's stance on free speech. John McTernan criticizes JD Vance for calling it Orwellian, arguing that it's absurd to claim we lack free speech. He emphasizes that breaking the law isn't free speech; it's simply illegal behavior.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Britain has gone fully Orwellian. John McTernan, a former Tony Blair advisor, slams JD Vance's comments on Britain’s prohibition on free speech as "monstrous" and "insulting" to the UK. He insists that Britain has free speech and how it’s “preposterous” to suggest that people who break the law by violating speech laws shouldn’t be imprisoned. “If you’re breaking the law, that’s not free speech. That’s breaking the law.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
I find it insulting that someone like JD Vance would come to Europe and lecture us on our laws. He should run for office here if he wants to change things. It's outrageous, especially at a security conference focused on the real threat to Europe: Russia. To say the threat comes from within, from attacks on free speech, is completely wrong.
We're a country that values women's rights and enforces laws to protect them. Vance's claim about eroded liberty, like private prayer being criminalized, is false. Our laws protect women from harassment when accessing abortion services, and buffer zones are in place for that reason. Praying silently within these zones is against the law. He is wrong to come here and say such insulting things, especially given the real security threats we face.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you make of what JD Vance has said? Do you agree with him?
Speaker 1: I think it's, insulting to our country for us to change our laws. He should come and run, for office in parliament and make his case. It is irrelevant to the Munich, the Munich Security Conference, when there is a country, Russia, actively at war with the European country which invaded and passively at war with a whole other range of European countries like Georgia. There is no absolutely no truth in his statement, that the the threat to Europe is not from Russia. It's from somewhere else.
It's from an inside. It's from attacks on free speech. Now we are a country in which abortion is legal, thankfully, and the rights of the women are put first in their defending. And there are laws, and those laws should be enforced. And it's extraordinary to me that JD Vance was to come to Europe and start lecturing which laws we should apply.
And I think it's just deeply, deeply insulting. I mean, the whole speech, well, was monstrous, I think.
Speaker 0: Monstrous. You don't think he has a point at all in regard to the erosion of free speech and liberty in this country?
Speaker 1: No. He does not have a point at all.
Speaker 0: Very interesting. Okay. I mean, I it's I'm sort of slightly stumped, to be honest, because I wasn't expecting to have such a strong opinion on that. I mean, he's talking as he says there about the fact that liberty has been, I mean, eroded on that where I mean, he's talking about paraphrasing, of course, but he's talking about, private prayer in someone's own home potentially being a criminal offense. I mean, isn't that something?
No.
Speaker 1: He's not.
Speaker 0: No. He's not. But what he did, he did talk about that.
Speaker 1: No. Yeah. Yeah. He's talk he's he's not talking about the laws we have. The laws we have are to protect women from being harassed when they use their rights, their rights, to access abortion, and that is there there's been laws being passed in The UK, laws by the UK government, and laws being passed
Speaker 0: But his point was about someone by
Speaker 1: the Scottish.
Speaker 0: His point was about someone praying silently for a child in
Speaker 1: in silence. No. It's praying inside a buffer zone, breaking of the law. If people break the law, the law is clear. If you break the law, that's not free speech, that's breaking the law.
Just as is to chant, you you know, there are there are chants which are banned in football matches correctly. You know, and and you don't have an absolute right to free speech. There are barriers around to protect women. And, you know, this man this man's this man's right to harass women is not an absolute right. Women don't have the right
Speaker 0: to harass How is someone being harassed by praying in an area near an abortion clinic if someone is doing
Speaker 1: their job? If you want to pray, pray in your own home. If you want to pray, go to a church or a chapel, or a mosque, go and pray at a place of religion standing by an abortion clinic is intended, deliberately intended to intimidate. And the the creation of buffer zones is to give women the right to access
Speaker 0: access abortion rights. JD Vance, you have said, John, in this interview, shouldn't come to Europe to, then criticize us. I mean, we have, and various political leaders, have very strong views. In fact, Labour had a number, as other parties did, of course, as well, sent people to campaign in United States elections. I'm not saying they shouldn't
Speaker 1: do that. I'm
Speaker 0: not saying they shouldn't do that they shouldn't do that necessarily. What I'm saying is that just because you don't live somewhere, you do have the right to have an opinion on it. And surely JD Vance has the right to make his views clear however he wants to do as the number two person in The United States.
Speaker 1: Look. He is the vice president of The United States. He's come to Europe, the Mainland Of Europe, where there is a war, an ongoing war in a European country, a war of aggression, by the Russian state, a war of aggression against an independent European country, which we have been supporting that country, Ukraine, European Union allies been supporting that country. Even in the past, The US supported that ally against, the aggressive incursion, and the potential war crimes. And of that and he comes to he comes to Europe.
And at the Munich Security Conference, Security Conference is not about free speech, not about a European conference on my views on European countries, Security Conference. And he says, Russia is not the main threat to Europe. Russia is the main threat to Europe. And to set to set to to come and give that speech is insulting to Europe, insulting to our security, insulting to our insulting to our security, insulting to our country what he just said. And and, you know, that may be the way the Trump administration was.
Right? Because they have been aggressive towards Canada, insulting to Canada. Aggressive towards Denmark, insulting towards Denmark, aggressive towards Mexico, insulting towards Mexico. Maybe that's the way the Trump advance administration want to act Although or Putin rather than like a democratic country.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Boris Pistorius, the irony-blind German Defense Minister, slammed JD Vance for daring to compare European democracies to totalitarian regimes at the Munich Security Conference. https://t.co/bhwR5wIX4J
Video Transcript AI Summary
I must address the US Vice President's recent speech questioning the state of democracy in Germany and Europe. His comparison of Europe to authoritarian regimes is unacceptable. In our democracy, every opinion has a voice, even extremist parties can campaign freely. We even allow media that spread Russian propaganda and answer their questions.
However, democracy doesn't mean a minority dictates truth, and it must defend itself against those who seek to destroy it. I disagree with the Vice President's suggestion that our democracies oppress minorities. We defend our countries for democracy, freedom of opinion, the rule of law, and the dignity of all.
Unlike the Vice President, I want to focus on European and transatlantic security. The US is pushing for a quick peace settlement between Russia and Ukraine, expecting Europe to secure any resulting agreement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is why I cannot just ignore what we heard before. I cannot not comment on the speech we heard by The US Vice President. We fight for your right to be against us. That is the motto one of the mottoes of the Bundeswehr, and it stands for our democracy. This democracy that was just called into question by The US Vice President, not just the German democracy, but Europe as a whole, he spoke of the annulment of democracy.
And if I understood him correctly, he compares the condition of Europe with the condition that prevails in some auto authoritarian regimes. Ladies and gentlemen, this is not acceptable. This is not acceptable. This is not the Europe, not the democracy where I live and where I conduct my election campaign right now. And this is not the democracy that I witness every day in our parliament.
In our democracy, every opinion has a voice. And it makes it possible for parties that are partly extremists such as the AfD, and they can campaign just as any other party. This is democracy. And if the vice president had the opportunity to switch on a TV set when he arrived yesterday, he would have seen one of those in Primetime TV. By the way, we even admit media that spread Russian propaganda and the representatives of the federal government answer their questions.
Nobody is excluded. But democracy does not mean that a vociferous minority will automatically be right, and they cannot decide what truth is. It does not mean that anyone can say anything, and democracy must be able to defend itself against extremists that try to destroy it. I am happy to live in Europe where this democracy is defended every day against its internal and external enemies. And therefore, I would like to explicitly contradict and oppose the impression that vice president Vance suggested here that our democracies oppress and silence minorities.
We not only know against whom we defend our countries, but also what we defend it for. It's for democracy, for freedom of opinion, for the rule of law, and the dignity of each and everyone, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 1: Ladies ladies and gentlemen, but unlike the vice president, I would also like to focus my speech on the most pressing questions of European and transatlantic security. The last days have confirmed what many had speculated for months. The United States are pushing for a quick peace settlement between Russia and Ukraine, and they expect Europe to take the lead in securing any agreement that follows.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
This is shocking. FEMA employees deliberately skipped over disaster-afflicted homes that had Trump signs. Internal documents show that safety concerns were never actually cited, contrary to claims they later made to the press. https://t.co/YmjuUXTDXB
Video Transcript AI Summary
A FEMA supervisor allegedly told workers to avoid homes with Trump campaign signs while assisting hurricane victims in Florida. An official report confirms that FEMA employees skipped homes with Trump '20 '20 '4 campaign signs. The allegations began circulating in October after Hurricane Milton. The FEMA supervisor in Washington told workers to avoid houses with Trump signs while canvassing neighborhoods. The report makes clear that there were no safety concerns at the houses with Trump signs. The OSC says the FEMA manager violated the Hatch Act, which prevents federal employees from political activity, including using one's official authority to affect an election. The FEMA manager has since been fired. There have also been stories of people in North Carolina who felt they were not getting the help they needed from FEMA because of their political beliefs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Void Holmes advertising Trump. That's what a then FEMA supervisor allegedly told workers who were on the ground to assist hurricane victims in Florida last year. But now a new report from a federal watchdog confirms that FEMA employees did skip over homes with Trump campaign signs in the yard. Senior correspondent Brian Enton joins us live from Miami with more on this. And, Brian, there is now confirmation that this happened.
Speaker 1: Yeah. We've been covering this for a while. We heard rumblings of this happening, but now the official office of the special counsel report, has come out, and it says five different members of a FEMA crew reported that they did not visit a home because there was a Trump '20 '20 '4 campaign sign. The allegations of this happening first began circulating in October after hurricane Milton ravaged Florida. And according to the new OSC report, a FEMA supervisor in Marnie, Washington told the FEMA workers to avoid the houses with Trump signs while canvassing neighborhoods, to assist hurricane survivors.
This new report makes clear that none of the crew cited any safety concerns at the houses with the Trump signs. The OSC says the FEMA manager violated the Hatch Act, which prevents federal employees from political activity. The violations include engaging in political activity while on duty and using one's official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election. Those were the official violations that FEMA manager has since been fired, Nicole. But remember, these are just the reports that were made public.
There have been stories of people also, in North Carolina after hurricane Helene who felt that they were not getting the help they needed from FEMA because of their political beliefs.
Speaker 0: Alright. Nicole? Brian Enten.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I confronted journalists questioning the transparency of Elon Musk and DOGE regarding fraud and waste findings. I presented facts and evidence, emphasizing that Musk is under intense scrutiny and that DOGE has been transparent on its X profile, sharing daily reports with the White House. I also pointed out various instances of government fraud, such as funding for climate initiatives in Sri Lanka and millions allocated to DEI programs at the USPTO.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
Karoline Leavitt is an absolute firebrand. Confronted by journalists who claim that Elon Musk and DOGE are not being transparent about their findings of fraud and waste, Leavitt lays out the facts, and she brings receipts. Elon Musk is the world’s most scrutinized man, not some faceless bureaucrat, and DOGE has been forthcoming on its findings on its X profile. It has also been providing daily reports of its discoveries to the White House, which Leavitt is more than happy to provide to the press. Leavitt highlighted several instances of fraud by the federal government, including funding for climate change to Sri Lanka, millions in DEI programs for the USPTO, and more.
TruthArchive.ai AI Summary
I shared some shocking findings about the Department of Defense's spending. They paid $32,000 to replace just 25 coffee cups, which cost $1,300 each for the KC-10 aircraft. Additionally, a recent audit revealed Boeing overcharged the Air Force by 8,000% for soap dispensers, leading to a $149,072 overpayment. Overall, the audit showed the Air Force overpaid about $1 million for certain spare parts for the C-17 transport planes. It’s clear there are serious issues with procurement practices.
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
The Department of Defense paid $32,000 to replace 25 coffee cups and hundreds of thousands of dollars for soap dispensers. DOGE is needed. “In October 2024, a two-year audit by the Defense Department Inspector General found Boeing overcharged the Air Force by 8,000% for soap dispensers that the service branch paid $149,072 over market price for. Of a selected 46 spare parts that were scrutinized by the audit, the report found the Air Force overpaid about $1 million for 12 of them for its C-17 transport planes. That followed a 2018 congressional inquiry that revealed the Air Force was spending $1,300 for each reheatable coffee cup on its KC-10 aircraft – and then replacing them instead of repairing them when their handles broke. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, found the Air Force spent $32,000 replacing 25 cups.”
@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong
FBI agents are leaking confidential law enforcement orders to enable criminals to escape deportation and arrest. This needs to end. https://t.co/aCcFE6mRxq
