TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

So I talked to the owner of this house right here in Pasadena. I talked to the owner. The owner does not have a smart meter on this house, on the front part of his house. There's no smart meter. No smart meter. So So the house did not burn. The back house is the part of the house that had the smart meter, and everything in the back of his house is burnt. No smart meter. Smart meter. No smart meter. Nothing. Nothing's burned. All the trees, but the house state is perfectly fine. But the back house is completely gone, and that's

Smart utility meters are being installed on millions of homes, but some homeowners claim they are causing health issues. Carol Garcia, a homeowner in Rochester Hills, says she experiences symptoms like bloody noses, headaches, and insomnia since the meters were installed. She blames the meters, which use electromagnetic frequency to transmit energy usage data. Other Metro Detroiters have also reported similar symptoms. However, DTE, the energy company, insists that the meters are safe and secure, using low power radio transmissions. Garcia believes that the public is unaware of the potential health effects. A state representative has expressed concerns about the issue.

The discussion focuses on fires in Washington, mentioning “the Palisades” and Lahaina, and asserts that governments and electric companies “are notorious for burning down cities.” The speaker says that while someone may claim the cause is “climate change,” they want to rely on a different source, quoting a US Department of Agriculture document titled “Forest fire as a military weapon.” The speaker then frames the cause as smart meters rather than climate or government action. They describe a specific burned house alongside surrounding vegetation that is “perfectly green,” and claim the trees and plants remain green while the house burns. The speaker attributes this to the idea that “when smart meters catch on fire, that’s exactly what they look like,” and claims there are “all over the country” examples. They state there are “Ninety million smart meters across the country.” They connect this to “the city that burned,” saying it was a “smart city,” with “grids” and “smart meters,” and with everything “interconnected from the electric company.” The speaker recalls “all those fires in California” and states that the Palisades lawsuit claims “that faulty PG&E smart meters started their house fires.” The speaker supports the claim with testimony and dates. They cite “Former meter reader testifies at California Public Utilities Commission, Santa Rosa, California, two thousand twelve,” with the statement “Smart meters cause fires.” They also claim they “show one of the smart meters catching on fire and then the whole house burning down,” describing it as “Yep.” The speaker then claims that information about smart meter fires has been “wiped off the internet.” They say that when typing “smart meter fires,” results say “Those don’t happen,” and they describe “Here’s the evidence” and “the evidence that gets wiped off the internet,” claiming this is done “so people aren’t aware” and so others can “blame climate change,” while “the government can keep setting up fifteen minute cities,” and “the electric companies can keep putting out smart meters.” The speaker advises viewers that if they have “a smart meter on your house,” they should “get an analog meter” and “opt out.” They claim that if “enough people opted out,” “they can’t.” They also describe “calling it climate change and writing books about climate change” as part of the same narrative, while closing with “Love you all.” Finally, the speaker adds that “the smart meters are also in Canada too,” and claims they “make your bill four times the price.”

Government remotely installed geofencing and geotiming on a Hyundai Kona EV without consent during a software upgrade. The new terms allow setting range and time limits on the car remotely, with exceptions for emergencies or legal requirements.

A smart meter caught fire at a house in Pasadena, but the main part of the house, which lacked a smart meter, remained undamaged. The back of the house, where the smart meter was located, suffered significant fire damage. Witnesses reported that PG&E employees arrived quickly, with one removing the smart meter while firefighters worked. This incident follows a similar occurrence in Kermit, where an electrical surge at a smart meter reportedly caused a fire.

The discussion argues that people will need to adapt quickly to “hard times,” because modern expectations make sudden loss of basic services especially destabilizing. If air conditioning or power stops during extreme heat (e.g., Phoenix or Texas at 105 degrees), the speaker says people may enter shock because many households expect running water and readily available food, including support via government programs such as EBT or food stamps. The speaker claims that if these systems stop, large portions of the population will feel the “social contract has been broken,” contributing to social fracture and collapse. A major point is that for most of human history, people had no air conditioning, refrigeration, or even electric fans; “the temperature was the temperature.” In winter, the speaker says people built fires, and in summer they did the best they could without electricity. The speaker contrasts modern disputes about thermostat settings (e.g., arguing over 74 vs. 78) with a baseline where temperature control was not an option for 99.9% of people. To illustrate toughness without modern comforts, the speaker references Herman Lehman, describing his kidnapping as a boy by Indigenous people and his experience of being pursued while being chased by Texas Rangers. The speaker emphasizes that settlers and captives adapted rather than collapsing emotionally, and it describes survival practices on the run: riding for days straight, sleeping in the saddle, eating cold food such as stomach contents from killed animals, and avoiding fires because light and smoke could reveal their position. The speaker also describes eating scarce resources such as mud for moisture and insects, lizards, and frogs when necessary. The speaker further claims that this toughness was reinforced through training and discipline. It describes boys being raised primarily with men after infancy, tested through constant fighting and wrestling matches, and abandoned if they did not perform. The conclusion is that, entering severe conditions, a mindset must become “hard very fast” to avoid shock from sudden loss of climate control and electricity. The second speaker then discusses protective items designed around shielding from electronic theft. The speaker claims that criminals can compromise transactions by placing real card readers over readers and extracting information for identity theft, and that criminals can also scan cards’ chips using a device. As a response, the speaker describes RFID-blocking wallets and “Faraday cage” style wallets/purses/bags intended to prevent unauthorized scanning and protect stored cards and cash.

California sent an emergency text to all cell phones, causing an immediate 2,500-megawatt drop in demand. This confirmed the speaker's belief that demand management can be automated with modern technology. The speaker suggests automating demand response using smart devices, Wi-Fi, and electric vehicles as bidirectional power resources. EV owners could gain additional value by putting power back into the grid. The speaker emphasizes that technology now allows for managing demand and optimizing energy use, not just reducing it. This technology enables smoothing out the demand curve and utilizing distributed variable resources. The speaker is optimistic this will happen.

The speaker received a high electricity bill of $696.27 from TXU. They recall a time when they could sleep with just a fan, but August's intense heat led them to turn on the air conditioning and set the thermostat to 71 degrees. The speaker acknowledges this was a "sin of comfort" and a "betrayal," but they couldn't bear sweating through multiple showers daily. Despite being "shackled" by the high bill, the speaker admits they would make the same choice again to experience the "chill" of air conditioning.

Officials from BGE say one of the power plants they rely on was somehow disconnected from its electric system, raising the threat of widespread power outages. Emergency repairs are underway as officials figure out if there's enough power available. In the meantime, BG is encouraging customers to conserve their electrical use through the evening. They say the easiest way to do that is by adjusting your thermostat, blocking sunlight from coming through windows, and try to avoid using any large. Customers are also asked to take steps now to prepare for a possible outage that includes everything from charging your phone and finding flashlights to making alternative arrangements. Also, your medical equipment relies on electricity.

The Republican lawmaker at the Ohio State House introduced a bill this week that would allow utility companies to automatically adjust your thermostat at your house. House bill four twenty seven would create a voluntary demand response program. Customers would be allowed to sign up to let their utility company temporarily adjust energy use, including raising thermostat settings or cycling water heaters during periods of high demand. The bill's sponsor, representative Roy Klopenstein, said it's meant to help homeowners homeowners and small businesses save money while reducing the load on the power grid. An analysis from the Ohio Environmental Council estimates the program would generate between 34 and $100,000,000 in savings for the utility system depending on how many customers sign up for it.

Today, we discuss the reasons to opt out of smart meters. In California, there are 13 million smart meters installed, raising concerns about their potential to cause wildfires. A PG&E meter reader mentioned that if smart meters catch fire, they can be remotely turned back on. Reports from Ontario highlight incidents where smart meters exploded near gas lines, leading to denied damage claims by utility companies. The Ontario Fire Marshal linked smart meters to multiple fires, suggesting a widespread issue. Notably, homes without smart meters in Los Angeles remained unharmed, while those with smart meters suffered extensive damage.

The speaker claims that PG&E could “get us in trouble” by putting copper wire around a smart meter, and argues PG&E already knows smart meters catch on fire. They cite “hundreds of lawsuits” against PG&E for smart meter fires, referencing fires in the Palisades, Hawaii, and “all the largest wildfires of the United States” as being smart meter related. They describe the alleged failure mode as a smart meter “pop” and “burns up like a Christmas tree,” then “burns down your whole house.” The speaker says insurance does not cover smart meter fires because insurance companies “don’t like to cover smart meter fires.” They then state that PG&E could be “mad” if someone tampers with a “fire causing meter,” and recommend switching to an analog meter. The speaker’s suggested process is to call PG&E and request an analog meter, explicitly saying they do not want a smart meter on their house. They claim the switch removes worries about the house burning down, while acknowledging there “might have to pay a fee,” which they present as preferable to losing the entire house. They also claim smart meters “ping like a cell phone tower,” and that the device is “pinging the entire time” and “pings every one millisecond.” They connect this to health effects they list, including insomnia, brain fog, and severe pain all over the body, and they further claim it can affect the heart.

Speaker describes receiving their first power bill under the new rules in which I pay for AI to plug in to our power grid. PSE and G did absolutely warn me that this would happen, but not that we’re funding AI. The bill more than doubled—from about $235 to $666.39—in Northern New Jersey, even though usage is on par with last year. They ask if the neighborhood tapped in or if the company allowed AI to tap in. As pissed as they are, they’re documenting the moment they become an extreme cheapskate. They reference a video of parents making kids pedal to power a TV and wonder if a bicycle setup could power their house. They’ve even checked whether wind turbines are legal in their neighborhood. "Just know every time you use AI, you're jacking up your own power bill."

Last Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday were the hottest days on record. Extreme temperatures are now a common occurrence, affecting us all globally. The world is getting hotter and more perilous for everyone.

Speaker 0 describes smart meters as more than just electricity meters, asserting they function as personal surveillance devices. They claim smart meters sense when devices are turned on or off, measure watt usage (even for small devices like an electric toothbrush), and transmit that data wirelessly through neighbors’ meters to the power company. The data allegedly records electric consumption every minute, stored forever on computers the public cannot access, revealing when someone is home, asleep, on vacation, hosting visitors, using lamps or tools, running a business from home, or bootlegging energy off the grid. The speaker asserts this creates a vivid profile of private living patterns and indicates at-home presence on the night of a murder. The speaker contends this is not electrical metering but personal surveillance—a warrantless search daily. They claim personal life information travels from the meter to the power company, to the government, police, and insurance companies, and to anyone who partners with the power company to access it. The speaker further asserts that even without a direct data-sharing agreement, information can be intercepted via the wireless signal from the meter, because smart meters are radio transmitters. They identify a one-watt radio station licensed by the FCC as the transmitter sending all electrical life details to a data center. Examples are given of authorities in Ohio, Texas, and British Columbia using smart meter data to pinpoint marijuana grow houses, enforce business licenses, and punish private home activities, implying surveillance beyond what residents accept. The claim is made that the power company can sell personal life data to anyone, and that unusual power usage patterns can be used as probable cause to raid a home for growing marijuana or running a computer server without a license. The speaker describes this level of surveillance as “about as big brother as it gets,” with utility workers going door-to-door to install meters. They express a personal opinion that smart meters should be removed from homes, arguing that power companies cannot claim the right to install surveillance devices on residences. They equate smart meters with wiretapping and note wiretapping is illegal in all U.S. states and federal territories. The speaker asserts that allowing a smart meter is tantamount to walking around with a constant webcam on one’s head and accuses the industry of relying on implied consent—the idea that permission is granted if the utility can change the meter, even if residents don’t understand the scope of what’s happening. As a practical step, the speaker advises telling utilities not to change the meter, noting that older meters were billed successfully. They claim to have sent a certified letter denying installation of a smart meter and mention a copy of their letter is available in the video’s description for viewers to adapt. They state post office certified mail is used to obtain a receipt. The speaker concludes that if the meters are installed on every house in America, it would cease to be America.

A Republican lawmaker at the Ohio State House introduced a bill this week that would allow utility companies to automatically adjust household thermostats. House bill 4.27 would create a voluntary demand response program in which customers could sign up to let their utility company temporarily modify energy use, including raising thermostat settings or cycling water heaters during periods of high demand. The bill’s sponsor, representative Roy Kloppenstein, said the program is intended to help homeowners and small businesses save money while reducing the load on the power grid. An analysis from the Ohio Environmental Council estimates the program would generate between 34 and $100,000,000 in savings for the utility system depending on how many customers sign up for it.

In Pasadena, the owner of a house reported that the front part of the house does not have a smart meter, and it remained unharmed. In contrast, the back part of the house, which had a smart meter, was completely destroyed by fire. The front house and surrounding trees are intact, while the back house is entirely burnt down.

California plants ban plants due to wildfires. 'the government shut off the water when the fire was happening,' and 'they wanna ban plants.' They claim 'smart meters were catching on fire every time there's a fire,' and that 'the insurance companies even know,' adding that 'if your house catches on fire from a smart meter, the insurance companies actually will not cover you.' The speaker cites lawsuits claiming 'faulty PG and E smart meters started their house fire,' and says the meter 'pulses 14,000 to 190,000 times per day,' a claim PG and E admitted in court. They reference a 2019 document 'how insurance companies know this' and contend 'smart meters actually jack up your electric bill by two to three times the price.' They advocate 'analog meter instead of a smart meter' and note California considers per mile road charge as gas tax revenue is expected to decline.

The video continues a “Fire as a Weapon by the Government” discussion. The speaker says a story about authorities catching a criminal running with matches is unbelievable, and they claim they tried making their own flame thrower to see what would catch fire in Arizona, but “nothing really happened.” They note a pattern they find strange: forests do not catch fire, while everything else burns. The speaker suggests that something that can melt cars is being researched, specifically “DEWs by the military,” and points to an executive order that they say continues this research. They address an anticipated objection that the fires were completely natural by asking why greenery is not burning while houses are. They claim smart meters are the reason houses burn instead of trees, stating that smart meters were rolled out on March 4 with the company Avista in the exact town, and that an opt-out was allowed after reports of fires caused by smart meters. They add that the speaker claims it cost only six dollars and that residents supposedly did not have to have a smart meter on their house. The speaker further claims that switching to an analog meter is necessary due to “so many lawsuits” involving smart meters catching on fire, and that if a house catches fire with a smart meter, insurance does not cover it. They then ask why governments and electric companies would “go out of their way” to burn and destroy things, and they say a proposed data center was stopped; they add that a couple days later their town was on fire. The speaker ends by pointing to a government document titled “Forest Fire as a Military Weapon” from the US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, saying it should make people aware.

PG&E is currently under criminal probation, and concerns have arisen regarding their involvement in the anti-smart meter movement. Smart meters may have contributed to fires globally, with pulse frequencies affecting local infrastructure, such as a water station. It's crucial to investigate what PG&E knew about weather conditions during the incidents, especially given their meteorology resources. Additionally, there are claims of explosions rather than typical fires, with evidence of melted aluminum and unusual heat levels. The situation is being compared to past fires, but the rapidity of recent events raises alarms. There's a call for accountability regarding the causes of these incidents and for Congress to address the financial issues facing the company.